Today we're bringing you Pat II of Potter v New Brunswick. Karly reads the concurring decision of Cromwell J. (McLachlin C.J. concurring) which agreed in outcome but not in legal analysis. If you want to hear Zach and Karly's thoughts about the case and constructive dismissal more broadly, head on back to the previous episode.
Legal Listening - Where Audio Obiter is Our Thing!
Link to Decision: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2015/2015scc10/2015scc10.html
Check us out at legallistening.com, look for us on CanLii Connects, find us on twitter @legallistening or email us at [email protected]
While you're here, check out our team!
Julie Lundy: https://www.julielundyart.com/)
Rad & Kel: https://www.radandkell.com/)
Remember we're always looking for guest readers to come on the podcast. Have a decision you love? Want to see it recorded? Reach out!
