More class actions for you! Today we bring you Cote J's concurring decision in JW v Canada where Cote J explores the "gap" in the settlement agreement and how she proposes it is fixed. To hear Zach and Karly's thoughts on the case, head on back to Episode 67!
CW: This case involves an individual who was sexually assaulted while attending Residential School. Please take care when listening.
Legal Listening - Where Audio Obiter is Our Thing!
Link to Decision: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2019/2019scc20/2019scc20.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAQSlcgdiBDYW5hZGEgMjAxOQAAAAAB&resultIndex=1
Link to Class Action Clinic blog on the decision: https://classactionclinic.com/2020/04/01/beyond-four-corners-settlement-agreements-as-contracts-in-class-actions/
Check us out at legallistening.com, look for us on CanLii Connects, find us on twitter @legallistening or email us at [email protected]
While you're here, check out our team!
Julie Lundy: https://www.julielundyart.com/)
Rad & Kel: https://www.radandkell.com/)
Remember we're always looking for guest readers to come on the podcast. Have a decision you love? Want to see it recorded? Reach out!
