Today we bring you Part II of our release of Callow v Zollinger, a 2020 SCC contract law decision. The concurring opinion, penned by Justice Brown (with Justices Moldaver & Rowe concurring) arrives at the same outcome of the Majority, but takes a different path. The concurring decision disagrees that a bijural analysis is necessary and that an extensive examination of similar law in the Quebec civil code was unnecessary. If you want to hear us chat about the care or listen to the Majority's decision, head on back to episode 76!
Legal Listening - Where Audio Obiter is Our Thing!
Link to Decision: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2020/2020scc45/2020scc45.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQASQ2FsbG93IHYgWm9sbGluZ2VyAAAAAAE&resultIndex=1)
We're now on Patreon! Become a patron, unlock fun bonus content, and support the project here: patreon.com/LegalListening )
Check us out at legallistening.com, look for us on CanLii Connects, find us on twitter @legallistening or email us at [email protected]
While you're here, check out our team!
Julie Lundy: https://www.julielundyart.com/)
Rad & Kel: https://www.radandkell.com/)
Remember we're always looking for guest readers to come on the podcast. Have a decision you love? Want to see it recorded? Reach out!
