We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode MC Weekly Update 6/27: Cage-free Eggheads (Are Men Okay?)

MC Weekly Update 6/27: Cage-free Eggheads (Are Men Okay?)

2023/6/27
logo of podcast Moderated Content

Moderated Content

Shownotes Transcript

Stanford’s Evelyn Douek and Alex Stamos weigh in on the latest online trust and safety news and developments:

Twitter Corner

Legal Corner

  • The Supreme Court issued its decision in Counterman) without acknowledging the very real harm that can be done by online stalkers, even when they don't explicitly threaten their victims. - Jan Wolfe, Jess Bravin/ The Wall Street Journal), @ma_franks)
  • The majority opinion held that prosecutors must show that a person was reckless when they sent threatening messages, and not merely that the messages were objectively threatening
  • Justice Sotomayor's concurrence got it right in saying that this was a case about stalking, not threats, but we'll have to wait and see whether lower courts pay attention, or whether they assume that the majority opinion means online stalking is protected by the First Amendment, as long as the stalker doesn't say anything threatening.

Join the conversation and connect with Evelyn and Alex on Twitter at @evelyndouek) and @alexstamos).

Moderated Content is produced in partnership by Stanford Law School and the Cyber Policy Center. Special thanks to John Perrino for research and editorial assistance.

Like what you heard? Don’t forget to subscribe and share) the podcast with friends!