We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Anne-Laure Le Cunff - How to Design Tiny Experiments Like a Scientist

Anne-Laure Le Cunff - How to Design Tiny Experiments Like a Scientist

2025/3/4
logo of podcast How I Think

How I Think

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
A
Anne-Laure Le Cunff
Topics
Anne-Laure Le Cunff: 我在谷歌工作后,创业失败,感到迷失,于是我决定回归本源,探索我真正好奇的事物。我开始学习神经科学,并通过写作来加深对知识的理解。写作不仅仅是复制粘贴,而是用自己的话语表达,这能帮助我更好地理解和记忆。我给自己设定了一个挑战,在100个工作日内写100篇文章,这让我受益匪浅,不仅学到了很多新知识,还发现了自己真正喜欢的主题和形式。通过这种方式,我将学习和创造结合起来,不断探索和成长。 Anne-Laure Le Cunff: 科学家对成功的定义是学习新事物,只要你学到新东西,你就没有失败。这与传统的成功定义截然不同,后者通常侧重于达到预定的目标。对我而言,重新与好奇心连接的关键在于摆脱对目标的执着,允许自己迷失方向,并从中发现新的可能性。阅读小说也对我的成长起到了重要的作用,它平衡了非虚构作品带来的功利性,激发了我的灵感和创造力。通过这种方式,我不断探索和成长,将学习和创造结合起来。

Deep Dive

Chapters
Anne-Laure Le Cunff shares her personal journey of rediscovering her curiosity after leaving Google and facing startup failures. She emphasizes the importance of identifying passions, even without a clear plan, and how this led her to pursue neuroscience and start writing online.
  • Left job at Google, startup failure led to questioning next steps.
  • Reconnected with curiosity by focusing on passions, regardless of outcome.
  • Returned to studying neuroscience and started writing online to deepen understanding and share knowledge.

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

I was completely lost at the time. I had left my job at Google. I had worked on a couple of startups. My startup had failed. And all of a sudden, I found myself in this situation where I didn't know what the next step should be. I didn't have a plan. I didn't have a clear vision. So I decided to go back to the drawing board and ask myself, what is something I'm curious about? And for me, that was... Welcome to How I Think with my guest today, Anne-Laure Lecomte. She is the author of the book, Tiny Experiments,

a transformative guide to rethinking our approach to goals, creativity, and life itself from a neuroscientist and entrepreneur and the creator of the popular Nest Labs newsletter. In this episode, we talk about redefining success, the importance of curiosity, and the power of tiny experiments, and much more.

How are you doing? Very good. Thanks for having me, Nick. Yeah, this is amazing. So we're over here in Los Angeles after the Second Brain Summit. And be honest, how are you feeling right now? I'm exhausted, but in a very good way. Inspired. I feel like I have so much to process and digest. So feeling good, but I need a bit of sleep.

i am in the same boat because it was just such amazing energy the summit that tiago put on bringing us all together and it was quite amazing because we have non-recorded keynotes including something that you shared and i took a few notes about your upcoming book tiny experiments and now we're going to talk about a lot of different things yes covering the book i know you didn't just want to talk about that

But it was pretty amazing and everyone loved what you had to say. So I hope we can cover a few of those things. Thank you. Yeah, it was my first time talking about it in public on stage. And it was an amazing experience after spending two years writing on my own, just me, my thoughts and my computer writing.

starting to put those ideas into the world is an amazing feeling. - Yes, my goodness. And so like, just to kind of zoom out a little bit, two years to write this, but it started way before that because you were writing online and what kicked that off? So what makes someone go from whatever you're doing before

to saying all of a sudden I'm going to write an article online. Like take us back to that moment, that critical point. Absolutely. I was completely lost at the time. That was a few years ago. I had left my job at Google. I had worked on a couple of startups. My startup had failed. And all of a sudden I found myself in this situation where I didn't know what the next step should be. I didn't have a plan. I didn't have a clear vision.

So I decided to go back to the drawing board and ask myself, what is something I'm curious about? Even if success or the outcome was completely out of the equation, what would be something I would be happy to wake up and study every day?

Even if nobody was watching. And for me, that was the brain. I had always been curious about how the brain works and why we think the way we think. So I went back to school to study neuroscience. And in order to really start deeply thinking about these ideas, not just...

trying to memorize the content that we were taught in school, really make those ideas my own, I decided to start writing online, to start translating those ideas into something that other people could use in their daily lives and work. I think, if I'm not mistaken, your first article was

which kind of maybe set the tone for everything that came, I don't know, was called something about the generation effect. - Yes, you have a very good memory. That was the title of the article, the generation effect. The reason why this was the very first article was because this is actually what inspired this project in the first place of writing online about what I was studying in university about neuroscience.

The generation effect is a phenomenon that shows that when you write about an idea in your own words, you're both going to understand it better and remember it better. So it's an amazing learning tool, just taking an idea and

And instead of, and this is something you've written a lot about, but instead of just copy pasting, taking a note, actually making something out of this idea that is your own is going to help you learn better. And that was part of what inspired me to start a newsletter and say, okay, every week I'm

I'm going to pick something I studied in university and I'm going to turn it into something that is truly my own. Yeah, I can't agree more. That's where we vibe so well on the value of that making process. And it's really an unfair advantage. I mean, you're a really great example of that where you just wrote... How many articles are on your website, Nest Labs, at this point? I think...

almost 500 articles at this stage. - Oh my goodness. And you did, you, didn't you give yourself a tiny experiment?

to write, was it like a hundred articles or something? - Yes. - Okay. - Yes. - What was that about? - I started with, so this is actually something I talk about in the book, how to design an experiment. And I explained that what's really important is that you define the action, what you're going to do and the duration, which is the number of trials. How many times you're going to repeat that action.

In my case, I decided to do 100 articles in 100 weekdays. Not 100 days because I wanted to take the weekends off. But that's what I did. And it was absolutely amazing to see the progress during the experiment, everything I was learning, but also discovering what I liked and what I didn't like in terms of

topics in terms of formats, even in terms of where I was sharing those articles. So by the end of the experiment, I had a lot of data that just didn't exist before I got started. I...

- Freaking love that. And it's so, so simple, but it just, it works. It's this modern day unfair advantage where if you, in this case for you, you were writing, you were sharing out there in the world and you might get some feedback, even no feedback becomes a form of feedback because maybe that idea just didn't resonate. It didn't click. And it is really just an unfair way of operating in the world, but we all have access to this opportunity.

And I think that's wild that at the heart of a lot of what's in the book with the tiny experiment is kind of in this meta way, it was your experiment to do this writing challenge for yourself. And it just seems so fun. It's just like no pressure, no stress. You're just going to do this thing. And what really struck me about this, and I'm curious how you approach this idea. It wasn't just, I'm going to write weekly newsletter and that's just what I'm going to do.

You said, I'm going to do 100 articles on 100 consecutive work days. So you gave yourself this duration. And I think that's like a component I don't think enough about in my own goals or efforts or whatever. So like, how come you just came about, like, was that just by accident? Or you just said, I'm going to do this? Or how come the duration was that? And how do you think about the duration with setting intention? I actually discovered this format in my studies, in my scientific studies.

It's the way all scientists design experiments. What you do is that you state in advance how many trials you're going to have, because if you don't do that, you're going to be tempted to stop in the middle or to take a break when the outcome doesn't necessarily look like what you expected, right?

And in that way, you would just fall prey to confirmation bias all the time if you stopped whenever you're like, actually, that doesn't look great. I'm just going to stop now. So by defining the number of trials before you get started, it forces you to wait until you have all of the data before you make a decision. Mm-hmm.

That is, yeah, that's it. Like that is beautiful. And it ties into something that I think you articulated so well. So when I was watching your recent speech, heads in the audience, they like cock to the side, including mine. Mine really, I was like, ooh.

but it was about the definitions of success. So there's a standard one. I was like, okay, okay, I get that. And I'm kind of curious if you could cover that. But what really popped out to me was the scientist's take on what success is. And I just thought this is like a goose bump moment.

So can you kind of help us out with success, what it was and how you're interpreting it? Absolutely. Success, the most common definition of it and the one I followed for most of my life when I was, you know, I got a job at Google and then I worked on a startup. I did all of these things and it was based on the most common definition of success, which is reaching a desired outcome. And you're really trying to get to a predefined destination, right?

When you don't get there, you blame yourself. That's basically the pattern most of us are following and how we're taught to chase success. Scientists have a completely different definition of success. The way they define it is learning something new. As long as you learn something new, you haven't failed. As long as you collect new data, you haven't failed. And that really changes everything if you start applying this experimental mindset in your life and in your work.

- Oh, I love that so much. It's learning something new and then you don't fail. So it's just becomes, okay, let's set a tiny experiment for this. Here's the action and here's the duration. And I'll just love the formula. It's so great. I'm curious though. So even going back a little bit, something that you were saying earlier is when you left Google, blank slate, blank whiteboard, and you're just going to kind of allow your curiosity to guide you a little bit

But where did that come from? Was it a parent that you modeled after? Was it just your environment growing up? Where do you feel that curiosity bug, that inner innate part of you was really, I guess, nurtured or fostered? Or is it more of a screaming to come out? Like, where was the curiosity from as you were growing up?

I think I definitely was lucky to grow up in an environment where there were lots of books around me. So I had lots of opportunities to explore my curiosity as a kid. But I then started focusing on this very linear definition of success. So I stopped at some point, which is very sad when I think about it. And sometimes I do fall back into this pattern. So this is something I really pay attention to. But

There was a period in my life where I would only read books if they were very clearly connected to an objective that I was trying to achieve. So it had to be connected to a project at work or something where I wanted to grow. And for me, what helped me reconnect with my curiosity in a strange way was to not have any objective anymore. I was completely lost there.

And it was terrifying for someone who, for most of her adult life, had had very clear goals, a very clear definition of success, and a very clear path to get there. Because when you're in a corporate environment, you know what you're supposed to do to get a promotion. You know what success looks like. It's getting this role. It's getting this project, et cetera. So finding myself completely lost, not knowing what I should do next,

in a strange and at the time terrifying way is what allowed me to reconnect with that childlike curiosity which I had known before. To kind of reconnect with the stranger of your past, your curious impulse, that's just, it's really amazing. And I'm kind of curious, as you're

transitioning and exploring things from, you know, one mindset of productivity, which becomes oftentimes a toxic form as we all can relate to, and sort of this new mode of operating or an evolved form of operating, I kind of wonder, you're not just reading nonfiction, you must have

some fiction books that, do you have anything that's just kind of like your hidden little secret, like fiction book or a few of these that you just love so much? - I read a lot of fiction and it's actually one of my principles now that I really try to balance fiction and nonfiction. And it's almost a symptom actually, if I'm reading a lot of nonfiction,

It is a symptom for me, a signal I pay attention to that I might be too focused on productivity at that time because I'm just trying to make the most of my time to always learn new skills, something I could apply.

So I would say that this is maybe like more of a, this is not something I have actually written about. So thank you for the question, but it would be one of my little secrets, the fact that I always try to balance fiction and nonfiction. And if I notice that I've maybe been reading three nonfiction books in a row, I will insert a fiction book. And I particularly like science fiction. Oh, lovely.

i i think i think this is such an interesting topic that we maybe haven't talked about that much but it's i think just on the fringe of things with it is is that exactly that one i love the signal it's a signal okay if you're reading too much non-fiction you know put the next self-help book down and consider going to a totally different aisle of like barnes and noble or waters waterstones is that yes what is done in the uk yes okay lovely and

Find that fiction book. You know, the one that I read and I was probably about just about to turn 30 and just hit me at the perfect time. It's one that I know you're familiar with is Le Petit Prince, The Little Prince. Yes. Do you want me to say it in French? Please. Le Petit Prince. I mean, is that required reading in France? Yes, it is. I think so.

- I think it is. I don't think I know anyone who hasn't read it. - Okay. And it's just, it's, I'll even go as far as to say is if I know someone's just reading nonfiction, I kind of don't want to talk to them. And if I know someone is, if someone is interesting, it turns out they're reading fiction. And it's like, so if you want to be toxically productive,

and game the system, the key is actually through fiction, which is going to cure you of your impulses to be toxically productive. - Absolutely. And it's such a source of inspiration as well. I've had so many of my best ideas coming from being inspired

by the way a fictional character thought about a problem or a situation, how they navigated something that looked like it was impossible to solve. And then maybe they reached out to a friend or maybe they took a completely different path to get to where they wanted to go.

And if you're in similar situations in your daily life and work, that can be way more inspiring than a three-step process in a nonfiction book.

And that's the sort of stuff that creates value. And I've seen you do this. And I have a very specific example of you doing this, taking something from the fictional world, the creative, the novel writing world, and taking it into a completely different field, which this entire week, this special summit that we were able to attend, everyone was talking about. And you really introduced it to PKM, to the best of my knowledge. And that's the concept of architects and gardeners.

that as far as I know, was originally to the best. I don't think it came from George R.R. Martin, but he's definitely the only source I can track it back to. I don't know like how you stumbled upon it, but what you did was you reinterpreted it

an idea from outside of, you know, he writes his world building novels. And so like, that's the magical moment that you took it from one medium to another. So can you speak to that specifically architects and gardeners? Yes. I did stumble upon his essay a few years ago and it just hit me that it

Perfectly. He was talking about writing novels and explaining that some people have this top down approach and they're more like architects and other people have this bottom up approach and they're more like gardeners. And it really hit me that that could apply to note taking as well.

And I took that, so explained that the architects, they like to structure the ideas. Gardeners, they like to just let them emerge more organically. And I added the librarian, who just needs to store their ideas somewhere and access them very easily. But they don't have this need to necessarily connect them or structure them in the way that the architect and the gardener do.

might want to do it. And what I love about this idea the most is not even how useful it's been to me and how practical it's been to me, is how it took a life of its own and how other people, including you, Tiago Forte, have been building on top of it, expanding it and bringing it in directions that I could have never imagined. So Tiago, for example, added the student as a fourth archetype.

And I love how you've expanded a lot on the idea that you're not necessarily one or the other. You can actually embody the architect in some phases of a project and then switch to the gardener when it makes sense and have this intentional approach, almost like this little cognitive dance where you decide to wear one hat or the other. And this is very meta, but for me, noticing how

GRR Martin had this idea. I read it. I decided to take it into a completely different direction. - Which personal knowledge management, which is a pretty nerdy field, but it is growing and it's something, it's a need we all need because we have informational anxiety or pain or whatever it is. So, okay, so you did this, okay, keep going. - No, and then the fact that you read that, you expanded on it.

And maybe someone right at this moment is working on the next iteration of this based on something they watched on your channel or that they read that you wrote about. This is what's exciting about being alive today and being connected to so many fellow curious minds and thinkers is

is this belief that whatever idea you put into the world is going to start having a life of its own and is going to keep on growing even if you're not yourself still actively working on it. - Yeah, I think so. I think so. It is wild how these ideas emerge in unexpected ways and lead somebody else to a breakthrough. And it's just like, so thank you for bringing that to the PCAM field.

I think it's at the core of everything, the entire creative process, the movement back and forth between the architect mindset and the gardener mindset. I know in an earlier entrepreneur effort with my friend Garrett, we had a fitness boxing business. It's still running. And we were brainstorming ideas of where to take the business. But I tend to be more of an architect.

So I was like grilling him like a prosecution. I was like, but what do you mean? Like, tell me like, how does this work? And I completely misread the vibe and I killed it. So that this concept even expands into interpersonal relationships and meetings. It's like, what type of meeting am I having right now with my coworkers, colleagues, friends, family? And am I showing up in the right way? I think it's got a lot of legs. If I can, I'd like, I'm curious how you approached this.

gardening and you know how you think about gardening in this context with your book because at the end of the day the book right here I'm gonna hold it up for just a moment tiny experiments I love it I love the the cool dots and everything I it's just it's freaking amazing how to live freely in a goal-obsessed world isn't this isn't a plug like this doesn't have to be it's just I love I love it so dearly

it's a book it's got a physical form you could say it's like an artifact in the world that will last forever so at the end of the day a lot of the gardening energy has to i don't know be architected into a structure can i'm just how did you what's your creative process here with the book like let's let's talk about let's dig in deep this is such a great question because this is actually something that gave me a bit of anxiety at the beginning of this project

I was so used to writing online where I had this very emergent process where I could write something and then get feedback from people and then sometimes just go back to whatever I had published and updated and edited it.

There are still articles that I have published in 2019 that I'm editing to this day. So this is digital gardening and you have your cool term for it as well, I'm sure you're getting to, but it's just a form of gardening. When we talk about that term, in this case, an article once it's published, it's not locked in stone. No, absolutely not. It is just a seed that I have planted. It will grow.

And just to keep on using the metaphor of like, I like using the term a mind garden, but you water that seed to see what it will grow into. The watering happens in public with other people contributing water.

to fertilizing the seed. So not only I publish this article, but I share it in the newsletter, I post it on social media, and I have people comment on it. Sometimes it's just to say, that was great, that was so helpful, thank you. But very often I also have people replying to my emails and saying, by the way, I also read this article, which I think is very relevant to what you're talking about.

And I say, oh, thank you. I actually hadn't seen that because there's no way I would have read everything. Right. And so I can sometimes go back to the article and just add another link to another idea, sometimes even add a paragraph, expand on something.

There also have been times where I wrote something that was completely wrong because I was not aware that some of the science I was covering had been debunked by this obscure team working on this project somewhere in another country. And someone would tell me by saying, by the way, have you seen this study which shows that what you wrote is wrong?

I'm like, oh, and I would edit the article again and say, by the way, sorry, this is wrong. Here's the latest. And just as a side point, that's a really important part for anyone who suffers from imposter syndrome or perfectionism, because you think you have to be right, like 100% of the time out of the gate before you can open your mouth. And instead you're showing that you can share, I mean, do your best, but if something comes up and you recognize that there's a way that you can improve what you said and express, then-

- Great, you can edit. - Absolutely. It's all about, there's actually an entire chapter about learning in public in the book. And so it's all about learning in public. But you can see why writing a book felt at odds with this process, because as you say, this is this permanent object. If I want to change something, I'm not going to run after everyone who bought a copy and say, "By the way, can you just give it back to me two seconds? I need to fix something on this page." So it has a very final feeling to it.

I tried to solve this with a few things. First, there are a few links in the book where I say, by the way, for the latest, click here and you'll get the latest research. So that's one way. But at a more fundamental level, I decided to really see this book as part of an experiment that is a little bit larger. It's another cycle of experimentation for me. This, I hope, is only going to be my first book.

And I learned so much in the process of writing it. And I took so many notes.

Something I also talk about a lot and I'm a bit advocate for is the idea of metacognition, of really thinking about your own thinking, about reflecting on your own process, not just acting, but reflecting. And I made sure while writing this book that I was also capturing how it felt, what worked, what didn't work, what I might do differently for the next one. And this is why I hope that

This book I'm so proud of is only the first iteration of many other artifacts of my thinking and my research that I might produce in the future. Wow. Okay. So you reframed it. I love it. So it's like this, this is, yeah, any iterations will be in the second and third and there will be.

there will be many books because I read this thing and it's phenomenal. It truly is. I'm not just saying it. Yeah, you really knocked it out of the park. - Thanks so much. I'm still at the stage where only a few select people have read it and I'm getting really good feedback, but I'm so excited for it to be out in the world.

And to have more people tell me what they think, because again, it is part of closing that loop, that experimental cycle, collecting the data, collecting the feedback. So you can know then what seeds you're going to plant next. Oh, I just love it. What I found amazing as you're a gardener, however, the structure for your book is,

as a an aspiring author yeah like in two years or so fingers crossed i'll have my first book so excited for you well thank you and i'm looking at your structure and i know i just have a few i just took a few screen grabs to put into here you have a four-part structure and i went to the appendix yeah and you have this really cool um image yeah which also is not the latest uh it will still be the same as just the the labels i made them

better. I must know I must know your iteration. So I'll find out afterwards. But yeah, so it's like, like a pie chart. There are four quadrants, but in a circular form. And you're at it's like multi layered because you have an acronym in the book. Yes. And what's packed? Yes. Okay, so it's like p a c t. And then each part is three chapters. So it's a 12 chapter book. It's like everything is

perfectly balanced and everything. And I'm just like... - And that was so emergent. It was 13 chapters. We only cut one chapter completely out of the book, one month before submission.

So it was a gardener process with a last minute switch to architects, basically. Which is also why I'm so inspired by your approach of saying you need both. You actually need both. And especially for a book, I think. So I would say I was, you know, the parallel principle with 80-20, right?

So for this, it was actually 80% gardener, 20% architects. And I think it was the perfect balance. Oh, that's lovely. Oh, that's lovely. It's something I'm going to keep in mind as well. Yeah, with the proposal and everything, just looking at the successful structure is really inspiring. And I think actually kind of helped unlock that.

some stiffness I was having around it. But you know, stay tuned two years from now and we'll see how it turns out. - And I'm here to help, you know, like if you want me to read your proposal, give you feedback, 100% happy to do this. I feel like I have a, like I kind of understand how it works a little bit. - Okay. - Yeah. - That might be helpful.

- Yeah, so I just wanna circle back to the tiny experiment itself. So in chapter three, like you set the ground in chapters one and two, talking about all this structure. And then in chapter three to end part one, it's like the thesis.

And it's like, I know this is the thesis chapter and it just comes out and it's like, this is the thing. It's like, this is the tiny experiment. Here's what you do. And it's just like this single line that pops out. You know, I will do action for duration. Some action duration. It just popped. So how...

What are some good ones or some examples of tiny experiments? You could really use tiny experiments for anything. They're very flexible, as you said. It's just choosing an action, choosing a duration. So you could have creative tiny experiments that could be about writing, for example. That's what I did with mine, where I said, I'm going to do 100 newsletters in 100 weekdays. That was my experiment. This could be around...

podcasting, what we're doing right here, you could say, I will do one solo podcast every week for a couple of months, where every week you just pick an idea and you see what happens when you just talk about that idea to other people. It could also be about different formats. You could say, I've seen people do experiments where they say, I'm going to snap one photo every day.

for a month and just capture those moments and practice what it looks like to frame a photo. One of my favorite ones from a member of the Nestlabs community was I am going to reach out to an acquaintance or an old friend every day.

for one month. - I need that one. I put so much pressure on like the old friends and then I ended up finding myself back on the internet somewhere. - Yes, and we have this fear that we haven't been in touch for a while, what are we going to talk about? If you make it part of an experiment, then it's just every day you're like, okay, which friend is it going to be? And it can be a little text message. It doesn't have to be complicated, asking how they're doing. And at the end of their experiment,

His name is Jamie, the person who was running this experiment. I asked him, I was like, so what does the data look like? How did that go? And he was so happy because he decided to not necessarily keep going because it actually was a lot of emotional work to try and figure out what to say and how. But because of that one month of experimenting, he reconnected with so many people. And I think that's a very important part of tiny experiments is knowing that

You don't have to keep going indefinitely. The experiment has an end. And at the end of the experiment, you can decide, do I want to go for another cycle, which could be longer? Do I want to stop? Do I want to pause? Do I want to reconsider? Do I want to tweak the format? Do I want to tweak the action? You have experiments where the outcome is, I really didn't like that actually. And that's not failure. You learn something new. So that is success. Yes.

that that is so profound and i was just kind of thinking about another angle of this is that in in our society and all the information bombardment i feel oftentimes that i've lost my sense of control i know we can say controls and illusion all that but we have a sense of control and that gets disoriented a lot and with with the tiny experiment mindset

there's a sense of control there. Like, you know, you can control, like you said, tweak for the next time, this and that. You're just kind of actively experimenting and you, I'm not sure if, have you noticed that as well? That there's just kind of a sense of calm, sort of, you know, confidence, control of the situation and in a loose way, but you just, you know, you're not like white knuckling it, but you're just,

You know what it is. - I like that you used the word control because I wanna suggest an alternative word. - Oh, please. - Which is agency. - Oh, I love it. Yeah, yeah. - It's a sense of agency. It's knowing that even though things are not in your control, you will figure out a way. You will find a path that works for you, even though you don't know what that path looks like yet. - Yes, absolutely. That is so wonderful.

And just for anyone listening, who's thinking, if you're listening to this podcast, how I think you're totally vibing with what we're talking about and you're, you're kind of wondering, okay, what's my tiny, what are a couple options for tiny experiments? What would Ann Lohr recommend? I'm just sort of curious. Do you have any,

you know knowing what you know about me my audience and that sort of thing what are some potential tiny experiments i know that's kind of a broad question but i'm going to try and come up with something specific to your community

So thinkers, very curious, they love exploring, learning new things. They probably have a little creative itch. Absolutely. Connecting dots. That could actually be a really good tiny experiment. Every day choosing two ideas and connecting them together and then publishing somewhere. Really?

result of that connection that you made. So that could be a tweet, that could be a quick Instagram story, that could be a quick newsletter, that could be even just telling a friend about it as part of a conversation. That's a form of publishing to the world as well. But every day for the duration of your choice could be one week, one month, three months,

go into your notes, pick two ideas, connect them together, and then share it with the world. I love that. I know you came up with that on the spot and it's really just perfect.

It is just truly perfect. And I think that's a nice way to, to end this. So everyone here has an action that they might consider if it vibes with them, if it comes with to them at the right time. And so with that, I think we're going to wrap this thing up and it's been such a gift to have you in Los Angeles briefly and to meet in person. I know our voices are giving out. We're putting it all out there, meeting so many wonderful people and to carve out this

moment in time just it means the world to me so thank you so much thank you so much nick this was wonderful thanks for tuning in to this episode of how i think we'll be sure to add all the links and resources we mentioned in the video description or show notes depending on the platform you're watching or listening from and if you're curious for more then feel free to check out another episode i'll see you there