We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode 'Original Sin' argues Biden aides enabled his reelection bid, despite mental decline

'Original Sin' argues Biden aides enabled his reelection bid, despite mental decline

2025/5/20
logo of podcast NPR's Book of the Day

NPR's Book of the Day

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
A
Alex Thompson
一名长期跟踪报道美国总统竞选活动的资深新闻记者。
A
Andrew Limbaugh
J
Jake Tapper
Topics
Andrew Limbaugh: 《原罪》这本书的核心是关于人性的,即使你不关心2024年总统大选的重述。拜登在2019年的一次竞选活动中,甚至想不起他最亲密的助手之一迈克·多尼隆的名字。这表明拜登的认知能力可能存在问题,而这本书旨在揭露这一问题。 Jake Tapper: 糟糕的六月辩论让我想要深入挖掘拜登决定参选的原因。在那次糟糕的、离题的回答中,拜登说我们最终击败了医疗保险,我简直不敢相信。拜登团队、家人和高级顾问一直告诉所有人,包括媒体、公众、民主党捐助者、国会议员,甚至他们自己的内阁,他很好。如果这不是掩盖,那么为什么这么多人对辩论感到惊讶?书中描述了美国参议员非常关心他们与拜登总统的互动的情况。2024年6月发生了一件事,拜登总统在白宫举行了一次关于移民问题的会议。拜登在讲话时出现了一些问题,神经科医生告诉我们,这是一种神经系统事件。布林肯国务卿在2023年与拜登共进午餐时,实际上是在质问他,你必须考虑你在第二个任期内会有多老,你认为你能应付得了吗?我希望我能更积极一些。舒默与拜登进行了对话,舒默认为拜登应该退出,他说,我已经和你的民调专家谈过了,他们认为你只有5%的获胜机会。拜登不知道这一点,因为所有的民调都是通过他周围的宣传人员多尼隆和雷斯切蒂来解读的。其中一位民调专家说,5%的获胜机会可能更像是1%。 Alex Thompson: 从2023年秋季开始,我们的报道显示,根据对200多人的采访,拜登有两种状态:一种是能正常运作的拜登,一种是不能正常运作的拜登。从2023年开始,这种能正常运作和不能正常运作的比例开始发生显著变化,而且不能正常运作的拜登越来越糟。一位高级白宫官员因为对正在发生的事情感到不安,并且认为他不应该竞选连任而离开了。我会将“不能正常运作”定义为无法说出顶级顾问或亲密朋友的名字。我们不是在讨论那种正常的遗忘,而是在讨论那种因衰老导致的无法进行对话的程度,无法提出数据、信息、知识,无法说出应该立刻想到的名字,比如他认不出乔治·克鲁尼。乔治·克鲁尼是他认识超过15年的人,是和他认真讨论过达尔富尔问题的人,是为他筹集了数百万美元并共同主持了那次筹款活动的人,也是世界上最知名的人之一。我说的是我们在辩论中看到的那种“不能正常运作的拜登”,那种无法清晰表达句子的拜登。一位离职的顶级助手说,他们故意将拜登与政府的其他成员、内阁的其他成员、白宫的其他高级官员隔离开来。核心圈子变得越来越小,这位白宫官员说,这是故意的,这样他们就不会意识到问题的严重性。拜登的日程安排变得更加紧凑和受限,他会在下午4点、4点半、5点就回到住所吃晚餐。其他政府官员也说,拜登很早就回到住所,在一天中的某个时间之后就见不到他了。安排日程更多是为了确保公众和其他助手看不到“不能正常运作的拜登”。这就是为什么日程安排变得更加朝九晚五,以及为什么他确实参加了那些活动,但这些活动通常安排在一天中的中间时段。一位长期担任拜登助手的匿名人士表示,拜登只需要赢得选举,然后他就可以在接下来的四年里消失,只需要偶尔证明自己还活着。他们的理由是,唐纳德·特朗普的威胁非常大,他们认为这是真诚的,因此他们有理由采取一些不民主的行动。很多人都在进行灵魂拷问,思考自己本可以做些什么不同的事情。有人这样对我说,有多少种选择呢?他们可以公开,但这会改变乔·拜登的想法吗?可能不会。而且这只会帮助唐纳德·特朗普。

Deep Dive

Chapters
This chapter explores the allegations made in the book 'Original Sin' regarding President Biden's mental decline and the efforts by his aides to conceal it from the public. The authors detail instances where Biden struggled to recognize close aides and prominent figures, highlighting the contrast between a 'functioning' and 'non-functioning' Biden.
  • Biden's struggles to remember names of close aides like Mike Donilon.
  • The existence of a 'functioning' and 'non-functioning' Biden, with the latter's appearances increasing over time.
  • Instances where Biden failed to recognize George Clooney despite their long-standing relationship.

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Hey, it's Empire's Book of the Day. I'm Andrew Limbaugh. Books about current day politics can seem very insidery. They can come off as by Beltway types for Beltway types. But

But even if you don't care about rehashing the 2024 presidential election, there's something very human at the core of the new book, Original Sin. That's the new nonfiction book by reporters Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson looking at the alleged mental decline of then-President Joe Biden and the, quote, cover-up by those around him.

And here's where it gets to the human part. There are people in this book whose loyalty gets tested, who have to ask themselves, am I loyal to Joe Biden or am I loyal to the American people? Today on the pod, a special episode brought to you by our friends at the NPR podcast, Consider This, a conversation between NPR Scott Detrow and the authors of the book about their reporting and the reaction from President Biden's camp. That's after the break.

Support for NPR's Climate Solutions Week Rethinking Home comes from the Nature Conservancy. People from all walks of life depend on nature for the food they eat, the water they drink, and the air they breathe, for strengthening their communities, powering their livelihoods, and safeguarding their health. Nature is common ground for everyone, and uniting to protect nature can help solve today's challenges and create a thriving tomorrow for future generations. Discover why at nature.org slash NPR.

This message comes from Square. You probably know Square from your favorite local spots, but you might not know that there's a lot more to Square than meets the eye. What started as a little white card reader is now being used to rapidly scale, build loyal followings, cover cash flow gaps, and expand to new locations. Wherever your business is growing, Square meets you there. Go to square.com slash go slash NPR to learn more.

Former President Joe Biden has known Mike Donilon since 1981. He's been one of Biden's closest aides for decades. He had a White House desk just steps away from the Oval Office. Yet in 2019, on a campaign swing in Iowa, Biden struggled to remember Donilon's name.

That's according to the new book Original Sin by CNN's Jake Tapper and Axios' Alex Thompson. It's one of several jarring moments reported out in the book, which chronicles Biden's decline over his time in the White House, as well as efforts by his top staff and family to keep that decline hidden from voters. Staff that included Donilon and Deputy White House Chief of Staff Steve Ruschetti.

When Thompson and Tapper dropped by our studios recently to talk about the book, Tapper said that disastrous June debate made him want to dig deeper into why Biden decided to run. Dana Bash, my co-moderator, and I had these iPads so that we could write to the people in the control room because obviously we can't talk to them and there was only one or two commercial breaks. And I wrote, holy smokes, like during that first rambling, awful non-answer where he said we finally beat Medicare. I just couldn't believe it.

Look, I mean, we had all seen him aging. We had all seen him tripping and misspeaking. We had all seen evidence of decline. But the Biden team, family and senior advisors were telling everybody, not just media, not just the public, but also Democratic donors and members of Congress, their own cabinet. He's fine. He's fine. He's fine. He's fine. I want to talk about the hiding as you frame it. Yeah.

Use the word cover up in the title. That's gotten a lot of attention. It's a strong phrase to use. Tell me why you justified using that framing when it came to President Biden's inner circle and the way that they protected him. If it wasn't a cover up, then why were so many people surprised by the debate? Mm hmm.

Beginning in fall of 2023, our reporting shows, based on the interviews with over 200 people, that there were two Bidens. There was a functioning Biden and a non-functioning Biden. And that goes back to 2019, but it was almost always functioning Biden. But beginning in 2023, the ratio of that functioning and non-functioning starts to change dramatically. And also non-functioning Biden is getting worse. Yeah.

And the White House, the people around them, we had one senior White House official who left and

because they were upset over what was happening and didn't think he should be running for re-election. And when you say non-functioning, what's the best way to define that? I would describe it as unable to come up with the names of top advisors or close friends. I would say, we look, we're all human. We forget, we all forget names. We all lose our train of thought. We're not talking about that. And also, we all witness that in people who are aging. I mean, again, I'm not talking about that. We're talking about to the point of ageing

You are not able to have a conversation. You are not able to come up with data, information, knowledge, names that you should have at the ready when he didn't recognize George Clooney.

That is somebody who is not only somebody he'd known for more than 15 years, not only somebody that he had had serious conversations about Darfur with, not only somebody that had raised millions of dollars for him and was co-hosting that very fundraiser. He's also one of the most recognizable people in the world. So I'm talking about that. I'm talking about what we saw at the debate, like that non-functioning Biden. I cannot articulate a sentence Biden.

You were talking about the framing of the cover-up, though, because it's odd, though. On one hand, he's the president of the United States. He's making a couple appearances of a – you know, some days he didn't make that many appearances, but he's giving speeches. He's appearing in public. He's carrying out the duties of the presidency. And yet, as you report it, there is a concerted effort to wall him off. What specifically was that circle of aides doing? Yeah, I mean, the one top aide who left the White House –

said that they intentionally shielded him from other members of the administration, other members of the cabinet, other senior White House officials. The inner circle became smaller and smaller, and this White House official said that was intentional so that they did not realize the extent of

You also saw the schedule become much tighter and more restricted. We have months of internal schedules that show that he would go up to the residence and have dinner at 4, 4.30, 5.00.

Other members of the administration also said that, you know, he just would go up to the residence very, very early and they just wouldn't see him, you know, after a certain point in the day. And the schedule just became much more oriented about making sure that the public did not and other aides did not see non-functioning Biden. And that's why, you know, the schedule became much more 10 to 4 and why, yes, he was doing those events, but they were often, you know, put in the middle of the day when, you

You know, those were his good hours. Enough of the book is out that you're getting a response. I want to read you one quote that we have from Biden's camp and I want to get your response. We're still waiting for someone, anyone to point out where Joe Biden had to make a presidential decision or make a presidential address where he was unable to do his job because of mental decline. What's your response to that? I mean, first of all,

That is setting the bar really low. That's their defense of our book? That, well, okay, well, where's the decision-making that was the wrong decision? I mean, I guess it's the key question for the president of the United States, though, right? Like, can this person make that key decision in that moment? Look, one of his most loyal top aides said to me, if the presidency is about two things, making decisions and being able to communicate those decisions to the American people, this person said, yes.

He was always good at making the decisions. He could never effectively communicate it, and it got worse and worse throughout his term. So I don't buy the idea that the president is just some like magic eight ball who just has to make decisions after the other and doesn't have to do anything else. So that to me is just a false premise. But beyond that, the book does describe situations where U.S. senators are very concerned about their interactions with President Biden. I'll just give you one.

There is an incident in June 2024. President Biden has a meeting at the White House, an event having to do with immigration.

And everybody listening, I ask you to go to Google and watch this moment. Biden has some sort of glitch while talking that neurologists told us was some sort of neurological event. They don't know what it was, but it was some sort of neurological event. It wasn't a stutter. It was something else. And Senator Bennett from Colorado, loyal Biden-supporting Democrat,

leaves that immigration event at the White House thinking, well, this is why the immigration policy in this country is so messed up. This president can't manage the portfolio. So I just, A, I reject the premise, but even if we're using that premise...

I don't buy it. It's not true. They haven't read the book yet, and that's fine. I wouldn't read it if I were them either. Alex, what to you was the moment that most alarmed you as a person who lives in the United States as you were reporting and learning these details about the things that were happening behind the scene? Another moment that sort of was jaw-dropping was I was interviewing a longtime Biden aide, and they're quoted in the book as saying, I'm paraphrasing here, all he had to do was win,

Then he could have disappeared for the next four years and only had to occasionally show proof of life. When you're electing a president, I think voters know that they're also electing the people around them. And that was their justification. This was their justification for they basically were acknowledging. Yeah, he's he's like having trouble. But like the threat of Donald Trump was.

which I think they felt very sincere about, was so great that they were justifying the

in some ways, undemocratic actions. Yeah, and these are the same people who say, hey, nobody elected Elon Musk. Well, no one elected Donilon and Reschetti. And yet we have a cabinet secretary telling us that Biden, Reschetti, and Donilon would make decisions about the economy without even talking to Secretary Yellen during the period that they cut off the cabinet. You talked to a lot of anonymous sources for this book. Did anybody regret not speaking out or

Or was it, this is the reality I saw, but it was career suicide to say that he couldn't run for another term. So in retrospect, I wouldn't say anything. If not regret, a lot of soul searching about what could I have done differently? You know, one person sort of put to me this way, it was like, how many options were there? Like, they could have gone public, but would that have changed Joe Biden's mind? Probably not. And then it would have just helped Donald Trump. Now, the one thing that I think people...

And who confronted him? Secretary of State Blinken kind of confronted him? Yeah, he had a meeting with him, he had a lunch with him in 2023 in which he basically was like,

You know, you have to think about how old you're going to be in the second term. You know, do you think you can handle it? Of course, Biden does. And that's kind of just dropped. You know, I think everybody in that circle, in that world should be should be thinking. I'm certainly thinking as a journalist, what should I have done differently? You know, Alex and I cover this, Alex, very aggressively from the White House beat me less so. And I wish I had been more aggressive. I there are there's a lot of regret. There's a lot of humility.

I want to end this interview the way you start the book, that the morning after the election, Joe Biden woke up convinced he could have won. He still thinks that. He still thinks he could have won. He went on The View to pre-butt this book, we think. And he was asked about that. And he said, well, look, I still got 7 million more votes than Donald Trump. Now, he's talking about the 2020 election. And the truth of the matter is,

I have talked to his pollsters more than he ever has. And they did not think that. And Chuck Schumer, when Chuck Schumer finally has the conversation with Biden in which he says that he thinks Biden should drop out, he says, I've talked to your pollsters. They give you a 5% chance of winning. And Biden did not know that because all the polling was interpreted through the spinmeisters around him, Donilon and Reschetti.

And Biden's shocked to hear that. When I talked with one of the pollsters about that story, 5%, he said it was probably more like 1%. That's Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson. Their new book is Original Sin, President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again. Thanks for talking to us. Thank you.

And just a reminder that signing up for Book of the Day Plus is a great way to support NPR's book coverage and public media. And you'll get to listen to every episode sponsor-free. So please go find out more at plus.npr.org slash book of the day. This message comes from Thrive Market. The food industry is a multi-billion dollar industry, but not everything on the shelf is made with your health in mind.

At Thrive Market, they go beyond the standards, curating the highest quality products for you and your family while focusing on organic first and restricting more than 1,000 harmful ingredients. All shipped to your door. Shop at a grocery store that actually cares for your health at thrivemarket.com slash podcast for 30% off your first order plus a $60 free gift.

This message comes from Warby Parker. What makes a great pair of glasses? At Warby Parker, it's all the invisible extras without the extra cost, like free adjustments for life. Find your pair at warbyparker.com or visit one of their hundreds of stores around the country.

This message comes from Bombas. Socks, underwear, and t-shirts are the top three requested clothing items by people experiencing homelessness. Bombas makes all three and donates one item for every item purchased. Go to bombas.com slash NPR and use code NPR for 20% off.