We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Diddy Trial Bombshells | Sex Trafficking, Witness Testimony & Elite Cover-Ups

Diddy Trial Bombshells | Sex Trafficking, Witness Testimony & Elite Cover-Ups

2025/5/15
logo of podcast Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast

Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
C
Chad
I
Ian Carroll
Topics
Chad: 我认为肖恩·Diddy·科姆斯案已经演变成一场法律和文化风暴,涉及性交易、毒品分销、枪支持有和刑事阴谋等指控。关键证人卡西·文图拉的证词揭露了多年来遭受虐待的细节,其他证人也开始描绘音乐帝国背后隐藏的世界,一个充满权力、控制和黑暗的世界。我认为Diddy的性交易和敲诈勒索等指控与杰弗里·爱泼斯坦案有很多相似之处,他们都是精英权力和控制结构中,人口贩卖,更具体地说是儿童性交易的棋子。这件事牵涉甚广,甚至包括中情局和摩萨德,他们可能利用性交易来敲诈美国要人。媒体巨头肖恩·Diddy·科姆斯也卷入了类似的事件,这并不令人惊讶。在90年代,观看MTV和TRL是青少年常做的事情,他们想知道最热门的歌曲和最大的艺术家是谁。P Diddy或Puff Daddy,最初出道时,经常出现在这些节目中,他的歌曲总是名列前茅,而且他的视频中总是有其他艺术家,他让很多人因此成名。这有点像关于光照会的阴谋论,为了成名,你必须将灵魂出卖给魔鬼,承诺服从他们的命令,放弃自己的道德和信仰。主流媒体、音乐和好莱坞都有这种邪恶的控制结构,如果你不遵守,你就不会成名。哈维·韦恩斯坦曾对好莱坞拥有巨大的权力,但他们不知何故还是对他下手了。显然,这家伙是个垃圾,但还有很多制片人和导演也对女性做了同样的事情,她们基本上必须献出肉体才能得到角色。音乐行业也在发生同样的事情,P. Diddy在90年代受到克莱夫·戴维斯的巨大影响,克莱夫·戴维斯是当时音乐界的大人物。哈维·韦恩斯坦是否在房子里安装了摄像头来敲诈这些名人?我几乎可以保证,好莱坞的一些名人和制片人也在以类似Diddy的方式运作。Diddy可能是一个受控制的操作员,类似于杰弗里·爱泼斯坦。如果你被中央情报局招募,他们会进行各种测试,检查你的道德和操纵技巧。我认为他们在P Diddy和Epstein这样的案件中也做了同样的事情。爱泼斯坦是一个获得了如此多关注、访问、奢侈、权力和利益的人,但却没有任何可信度来支持这些。他甚至没有学位,但他却在投资非常重要的人的钱,并且身处精英阶层。重要的是,要给予爱泼斯坦访问权限,控制他,并承诺他所有这些事情,确保他将灵魂出卖给魔鬼。魔鬼可以被说成是《圣经》中提到的魔鬼,不一定是一个人,而是一个系统或一系列事件,创造或进行邪恶的肮脏工作。当你谈论邪恶,想到杰弗里·爱泼斯坦,想到P. Diddy时,现在关于P. Diddy的一切都只是指控。哈维·韦恩斯坦拥有权力控制,但他不一定拥有像Diddy和Epstein那样的所有权力。他们想除掉他,这让我相信他是一个他们必须切断联系的人。每次发生一些事情,或者即将牵连到更高权力或控制这个团伙的人时,他们就必须除掉这个人。当所有这些人开始起诉他,说出所发生的事情时,他们感到安心并远离了他一段时间,然后提起了民事诉讼。他们决定必须起诉他,因为他们无法掩盖。他们开始想,我们到处都有民事诉讼,我们现在必须介入,因为我们必须控制叙事。他们将能够控制这次审判的叙事,特别是如果Diddy以任何方式、形式或形态参与某种更高层次的权力结构、操纵等。我们将讨论拉斯维加斯警察局长与此案的联系。约翰·佩莱蒂尔在拉斯维加斯91号公路枪击事件发生时担任队长,许多人认为这是一次彻底失败的调查,存在掩盖阴谋。他没有被降职或解雇,而是被派往毛伊岛担任警察局长。约翰·佩莱蒂尔也被点名参与了Diddy的诉讼。这起Diddy诉讼中,他被指控为Diddy的得力助手。这个可能控制或参与控制某些重大事件叙事的人,怎么会恰好与Diddy有关联呢?伊恩·卡罗尔解释了Diddy的指控、Diddy的帝国以及所有与之相关的人的意义。我想播放这个视频,然后再讨论审判,讨论正在进行的证词,以及Diddy是否会被判有罪,因为我认为检方目前做得还不够好。他们必须证明一件事,但我认为他们做得还不够好。 Ian Carroll: 涉及犯罪现场、古巴·古丁·Jr.等名人的照片证据、唱片公司高管。房屋的每个房间都装有隐藏摄像头,记录名人、高管、政客在派对上与名人以及未成年女孩一起喝酒和吸毒的场景。这可以追溯到图帕克和比吉的谋杀案。这关系到整个说唱和嘻哈行业以及整个音乐行业。罗德尼·琼斯对Diddy及其相关公司的高管提起了诉讼。他的律师声称,他已经获得了数百小时的Diddy及其员工和客人的录像和录音,内容涉及严重的非法活动。Diddy明确表示,他的保安主管法希姆·穆罕默德有权让人们和问题消失。Diddy的所有员工都被指示,如果他们在迈阿密或加利福尼亚被警察拦下,就联系穆罕默德先生。Diddy经常吹嘘自己控制了执法部门,但越深入了解,越发现他上面的人和执法部门上面的人控制着他。Diddy自90年代创立坏男孩唱片公司以来,一直是说唱界最有权势的人之一。24岁的他如何独自创立一家大型唱片公司?他是在他的导师克莱夫·戴维斯的帮助下创立的。有传言说他和Diddy在那段时间里有关系。克莱夫·戴维斯一直在管理音乐行业的重要部分。有人声称他们试图培养他做同性恋的事情。Diddy向琼斯展示了一盘秘密录音带,内容是琼斯的偶像与一个白人男子发生同性性行为。Diddy承诺,如果琼斯在镜头前做同性恋的事情,他会确保琼斯赢得格莱美年度制作人奖。琼斯先生发现Diddy在他家的每个房间都安装了隐藏摄像头。坎耶多次指责Diddy是联邦特工。Diddy也被多次指控下令袭击图帕克。当你开始挖掘有关中央情报局、联邦调查局、摩萨德在音乐界有触角的指控时,你会发现...像利奥尔·科恩这样的人,他可能是近百年来音乐界最有影响力的人。环球音乐集团的首席执行官卢西恩·格兰奇直接受到牵连,并在这起诉讼中被点名。据称,他参加了有未成年女孩和性工作者的派对,并且知道他们在饮料中掺入毒品等。当你谈论Diddy时,你也要谈论贾斯汀·比伯,他由Scooter Braun管理。在90年代,图帕克和比吉都在崛起,他们都在谈论离开他们的唱片公司,并开始自己的事业。图帕克开始稍微谈论这个行业的本质。有传言说Diddy下令袭击了图帕克。Diddy在图帕克和比吉离开后迅速崛起。这起诉讼直接指控他一直在进行性敲诈勒索计划。他提拔那些会参与性敲诈勒索计划的艺术家,并按照他们的意愿行事,因为不仅仅是他独自行动,他还排斥、攻击那些不愿参与的艺术家。

Deep Dive

Chapters
This chapter delves into the explosive trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs, exploring allegations of sex trafficking, drug distribution, and connections to larger conspiracies. Witness testimonies, particularly Cassie Ventura's emotional account of alleged abuse, are examined. The chapter also discusses the potential involvement of intelligence agencies and the implications for the entertainment industry.
  • Allegations of sex trafficking, drug distribution, and criminal conspiracy against Sean "Diddy" Combs
  • Shocking testimony from key witnesses, including Cassie Ventura
  • Similarities between Diddy's alleged operations and those of Jeffrey Epstein
  • Potential involvement of intelligence agencies (CIA, Mossad)

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Come over, how's that to me? I'll give you something to eat.

Hello and welcome to Investigator's Podcast. I'm your host Chad alongside my beautiful wife Sherry. On tonight's episode, we're diving into one of the most explosive trials in recent memory. That is the Sean Diddy Combs case. And what started as a string of civil lawsuits has now erupted into a full-blown federal investigation with allegations ranging from sex trafficking and drug distribution to gun possession and criminal conspiracy.

This isn't just a celebrity scandal. It's a legal and cultural firestorm with potentially massive implications. So far, we've seen shocking testimony from key witnesses, including Cassie Ventura, who opened the courtroom with raw and emotional details about years of alleged abuse.

Other witnesses have begun painting a picture of a hidden world behind the music empire, a world filled with power, control, and darkness. And tonight we break down everything that's happened in the courtroom so far, the charges, the testimonies, and what it could all mean for Diddy and the industry that has protected him for decades. We may even get into some of the conspiracy that we've talked about in the past. Guys, welcome to the show. It is May the 14th of 2025.

And for those that are new listening to this episode, you should absolutely go back and listen to our Diddy case, our Diddy episodes where we talk about in detail the conspiracy. We're going to break some of that down tonight. We're also obviously going to cover what has happened in trial so far. But I think that there are so many similarities in this.

the Diddy sex trafficking slash racketeering slash all the other things he's charged with. There are a lot of similarities to this and Jeffrey Epstein. We've covered Jeffrey Epstein extensively. Our last episode literally was about whether or not the Trump administration would actually release the Epstein files, the Epstein flight logs, any evidence to actually show who Epstein was trafficking young children to.

because we had Ghislaine Maxwell. We had her in court. There was four Jane Does that came forward. They testified against

I guess Ghislaine Maxwell, because Jeffrey Epstein is now dead. Although Jeffrey Epstein allegedly killed himself. But most people do not believe that whatsoever either. It was all the perfect storm scenario. Jeffrey Epstein was put into the same, I guess you can say, jail in the southern district of New York that Jeffrey Epstein was. Jeffrey Epstein was put into the same jail

Jeffrey Epstein was under suicide watch. And yet somehow the the logs logging people in and out of this area happened to disappear. The cameras turned off. It was a perfect storm of murder. And they murdered Jeffrey Epstein because they knew if they had to bring Jeffrey Epstein on trial that he was going to defend himself. He knew that he was against the cabal, the elites. And I think that Jeffrey Epstein 100 percent is a complete piece of shit.

but he is yet another pawn in the elite power and control structure of human sex trafficking, more specifically,

Child sex trafficking. And I think it goes way deeper than that. I'm talking CIA is involved, even in Mossad. You know, we talked about that on the podcast two or three nights ago with Epstein that we definitely feel like CIA was involved. Yeah. But even other countries could be involved in this sex trafficking schemes that blackmail very prominent people in America. Yeah.

Absolutely. And I think it should not surprise anybody that you now have one of the biggest media moguls in the world that is also implicated in something very similar. Sean Diddy Combs, for those that do not know or didn't grow up in the, I guess you can say early 90s, late 90s, early 2000s, Sean Diddy Combs was huge. I remember...

It was like every teenager's thing that they did in the 90s that you would go on MTV, you would watch TRL, Total Request Live. You'd watch all these shows, right? And when you got home from school, you want to see what the hottest songs were, who were the biggest artists. And for those that do not know a lot about Sean Diddy Combs,

P Diddy or Puff Daddy, when he first originally came out, was all over these shows. I mean, he had all of his songs in the top 10, the top 15 continuously. And not only that, he always had other artists that was in his videos. He brought in people from everywhere. He made a lot of these people very famous during this process.

And is almost kind of like the whole conspiracy about the Illuminati. For those that know anything about the Illuminati, there is this belief that the Illuminati, you kind of almost have to sell your soul to the devil, right? You have to say, look, for me to be famous, I have to.

commit to your commands. I have to do whatever it is that you tell me I am to do. And if I do those things, if I denounce everything I've ever believed in my morals, my, my everything, then I can be famous. And that's why they always say selling yourself to the devil, because the devil is in the details. The devil is in the system and the devil is in the power structure. And that is what mainstream media does a lot of.

But that's also what mainstream music, mainstream Hollywood does. They have this evil control structure around it. And if you do not comply with that control structure, then,

then you aren't going to be famous. And, you know, you go back to Harvey Weinstein, you know, the director that had so much power and control over Hollywood. For whatever reason, they did go after Harvey Weinstein. And I say for whatever reason. Obviously, this guy was a piece of shit. Yeah, but he was not the only guy that did the things he did. There was all kinds of producers and directors that did the same thing to women. You know, they basically had to give up sex to get a part. Yeah. Yeah.

Absolutely. And this is what's happening in the music industry. And we look at P. Diddy and for example, in the 90s, you know, he when he was really big, he was heavily influenced by Clive Davis. Clive Davis. Yeah. Well, Clive Davis was the biggest in the music industry back in the day. And I think the difference, though, with even Harvey Weinstein, at least from what we understand or know, Harvey Weinstein was one of the biggest, I guess, directors or movie producers in the world. And so so many of the act

especially actresses that you know today had to go through Harvey Weinstein to become famous. What does that mean? Well, what that means is that he used his power to the benefit and control of sex. Did Harvey Weinstein have houses that had video cameras set up throughout to blackmail these celebrities? I don't know. That would be a very good question to know.

We have not heard anything about that as of now, but I almost guarantee you that there is some celebrity or some producer, some director, some very high elite in Hollywood. I'm talking about movies and TV that is operating very similarly to

As Diddy has. There's tons of them. And I'm talking about the blackmail thing. So for those that don't maybe understand, you might be looking at the Diddy case as, well, he just was a freak. You know, he loved he loved orgies. He loved the sex parties. It was all for his benefit. It was just something that, you know, he had to have. He was a sex addict. Maybe you're thinking, you know, he had all this baby oil.

But I don't think that's what it was. I think Diddy was a controlled operative. I think he was a controlled operative very similarly to Jeffrey Epstein. And although you do have to, I guess, find someone that has the mindset that would be willing to do the things that Diddy did and Epstein did.

And this is what we talked about on our last episode. If you guys want to go back and listen to our Jeffrey Epstein episode, we talked about whether or not Trump and the administration would ever release the files of Jeffrey Epstein. But when you are recruited by the CIA, right?

or Mossad or whoever. But I know especially the CIA, if you're recruited by CIA, one of the things they do, they do various tests and they do tests to check your morality and your manipulation tactics and all of this stuff. They only hire the people that don't have backgrounds in law enforcement or anything that's going to be suspect, especially if you're in a foreign country like Russia or China or

they don't want Russia and China to be able to look you up and say, well, this guy was like FBI four years ago. So we're definitely arresting this guy. We're going to take Joe and blow off the street. We're going to make him to a CIA operative, a spook. And we're going to do all these tests to determine whether or not he would be the right fit. I think that they do the exact same thing in cases like P Diddy. I think they do the exact same thing in people like Epstein. Epstein,

was someone that was afforded so much attention

access and luxury and power and benefit with zero credibility to back it. Yeah, I know he was into investing people's money and he didn't even have a degree to do that. No, he actually quit college, if I'm not mistaken. I don't even think he was that smart. But he was investing very, very important people's money. And he was like in the elite. Yeah, structure. Yeah, for sure. And that's what you do. He had the access. Yeah.

The number one thing is like, let's grant access for Epstein and let's control Epstein and let's promise him all these things. Let's make sure he sells his soul to the devil. And that's what Epstein, I believe, did. And the devil, you can say is, you know, like in the Bible, it talks about the devil, not necessarily 100% as a one person. It is sometimes a system or a or a collaboration of events that that creates or is or does the dirty work of evil. Right.

And I think when you talk about evil and you think about Jeffrey Epstein, you think about P. Diddy. Now, everything right now with P. Diddy is alleged. And as I go back to Harvey Weinstein, Harvey Weinstein was someone that had this power control, but I don't think necessarily he had all of the power.

All of the blackmail structure as Diddy and Epstein did. But for some reason they wanted to take him out, which in my opinion, it makes me believe that he was someone that they had to cut ties with. If he was connected to this scheme, I don't know that he was, but,

But every time something starts happening or coming out to where it's going to implicate someone that is in higher power or control of this ring, they got to take that ring out. Well, and I think in this case, it was the civil court case that came out first when all these people started suing him and saying this is what happened when they felt comfortable and got away from him from some time and brought out this civil suit.

That's when they decided they had to indict him because they couldn't hide it. And that very well could be the case. And so they started to think, well, shit, we got civil lawsuits everywhere. We're going to have to now step in because we're going to have to control the narrative. Obviously, right now, we're not talking about the civil lawsuits necessarily. We're talking about this federal trial.

And so they're going to be able to control the narrative of this trial, especially if Diddy is in any way, shape or form involved in some type of higher structure of power, manipulation, whatever. But I want to start here and we're going to also get to in just a little bit connections with even the captain of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, who

to where this guy was a captain. And we're talking about John Pelletier. He was a captain during the Las Vegas harvest 91 shootings. And which was for most people, they believe it was a completely botched investigation. There was a coverup conspiracy. There was a lot more that went on with that shooting that, that killed a lot of people.

than we can even imagine. So instead of being demoted or just, you know, fired or kicked out of law enforcement forever, he was instead sent to Maui where he became the Maui police chief. He even took a pay cut to go to Maui to be the police chief. Yeah. But three months later, they did give him a pay raise. Yeah. They gave him a pay raise, but he was there.

just before the Maui fires happen. And for most people that believe anything about the Maui fires is the Maui fires was intentionally set and it was set for land or land control or land grabs. It goes so deep, but just understand this. We're talking about corruption in Las Vegas. We're talking about potential corruption in Maui. And then John Pelletier, this guy we're talking about, the once captain and police chief of Maui is also named in the Diddy suit.

And this Diddy suit, it was named that he literally was like one of Diddy's right hand men. So how is it that this guy that may have controlled or had some type of hand in the controlled narrative of certain massive events is also just so happened to be connected to Diddy? It's nuts. But what I do want to do is that we had had Ian Carroll on back in the day and

And I say back in a day, but when I say back in a day, I mean like a year ago. Last March. When this thing happened, we had Ian Carroll on. And for those that do not know who Ian Carroll is, Ian Carroll has kind of transcended media. And he does a really good job at

explaining things in very short time frames about what is going on. And he did a video about the Diddy charges, but also the Diddy empire, everybody that's connected to Diddy, how all of this means anything. And we had brought Ian Carroll on our show on X, by the way, if you guys want to go follow us over on X, just type in investigate earth podcast. You'll find us also on Facebook, Instagram, or wherever you do social media. Um,

But we had Ian Carroll on our live stream about a year ago when this thing first broke. And Ian Carroll kind of went down and explained a lot of what he's going to say in this video. But I do want to play this before we get into the trial, before we get into some of the testimony of what's going on and whether or not Diddy is actually going to be found guilty of this, because I don't think necessarily the prosecution is doing a great job right now.

especially some of these bigger charges that could actually land Diddy in jail for either 25 years to life. They really have to prove this one thing that I don't think they're doing a great job at yet. But let me play the Ian Carroll clip about how all of this kind of started. Listen.

We're talking crime scenes. We're talking photo evidence of celebrities like Cuba Gooding Jr. We're talking record label executives.

We're talking hidden cameras in every room of the house, getting recordings of celebrities, executives, politicians at parties with celebrities and underage girls with drinks being spiked with drugs. This goes all the way back to the murder of Tupac and Biggie.

We're talking about the entire rap and hip-hop industry and the whole music industry at large. But to be clear, this is just opinions and speculation. These are not statements of fact. When I show sources in the background, like the court case, you should take those for just what they are. I'm not saying that all of this is necessarily real.

So what's happened just now is that this man, Rodney Jones, who is a music producer that worked with Sean Combs, who is Diddy, he just filed this lawsuit. And he didn't just file it against Diddy. He filed against the executives at all the companies associated and against the companies like Universal Music Group.

His lawyers claim that he has secured hundreds of hours of footage and audio recordings of Diddy and his staff and his guests engaging in serious illegal activity. It's illegal for lawyers to make these claims if they don't have reasonable belief that this evidence is legitimate and exists. They could get disbarred for making these claims if they're not true. And some of that evidence is present in this lawsuit, like when Diddy allegedly shot a man.

And then the LAPD saw that room in the photo, the bathroom with all that blood, and were on the scene for hours and no arrests were made. They went with the explanation that Diddy told his staff to give, which was it was a drive-by shooting. Diddy made it clear that his head of security, Fahim Muhammad...

had the power to make people and problems disappear. This guy. And all of Diddy's staff were instructed to contact Mr. Muhammad if they were ever pulled over by the police in Miami or California. Diddy often bragged about having law enforcement under control, although the deeper you look, the more it looks like people above him and above law enforcement had him under control.

And I got to stop here for a second because we're talking about Muhammad. He was the bodyguard of Diddy. Obviously, he has massive connections. Now, there's one thing, right? If you have connections in, say, a local law enforcement agency, whether it's a sheriff's department or police department, we've had a couple of episodes on that over the past month where we talk about Spartanburg County. We talk about the Scott Spivey shooting in Horry County, South Carolina. And this is kind of local to us.

But there is corruption in law enforcement, for sure. I mean, we acknowledge that, absolutely. But in this case, in particular, you had Mohammed, which was a bodyguard. I don't know exactly where Diddy got this guy from, but what we do know is that

Obviously, he had connections to law enforcement and it wasn't just in a local town. It was in both California and Miami. These are two massive places. And I'm thinking Los Angeles, California, and then also Miami, Florida. How did he have these connections? Who is this Mohammed guy and how is he connected to Diddy? But more specific, Diddy.

likely how is he connected to the system that is above Diddy? Cause I guarantee you they sent someone as like their archangel. If you want to go biblical, uh, they sent someone to protect their boy, which is Diddy. They're like, Hey, you got to go and be this guy's bodyguard. If he ever gets in any shit with local law enforcement, whatever, you're our guy. You're maybe a spook, a CIA guy who, who knows, uh,

But you are on him. That is your job is to protect him wherever it happens. Yeah, this guy was basically in with law enforcement. And in order to get away with things such as murder, you need somebody in place like that. Yeah. Because it is...

or supposedly that Diddy was in charge of maybe even two murders that we know about of very famous people. Yeah, and one of those being Tupac, obviously. You know, Tupac Shakur, which was murdered in Las Vegas, and this was way back in the day.

So I don't know if Muhammad was around during that time. Not necessarily. They probably had someone else on the case at that point. But there is someone locked up in jail right now for Tupac's murder. It seems like all of the evidence really points back to Diddy potentially. Yeah. And there was a drive by shooting in his studio also that involved his son's friend. That was another suspicious murder. And if you even look into his first wife.

She died suspiciously as well. But then you also have J-Lo. I think there was there was a shooting, I think, in a club at that point as well that they also got away with. And J-Lo was kind of involved in all that stuff. I mean, it's really deep. But you don't just get away with all of this shit if you're just some random person. Even if you are a music mogul, even if you are some type of highfalutin,

music industry executive because he technically is. I mean, Sean Diddy Combs is a music executive of Bad Boy Records. Exactly. And, you know, when he started, which Ian's about to talk about here with Clive Davis and Bad Boy Records, there's something to this. What I would love to know is who Muhammad is, because I guarantee you he's tied to the government, just like I'm sure Epstein had someone very similar as Muhammad. Yes.

We'll go more into these cases in the detailed videos, but now the bigger picture. See, Diddy has been one of the most powerful people in the rap industry ever since the 90s when he founded Bad Boy Records. And he was only 24 when he founded it. He started his career as a non-paid intern at A&R until he was then fired in 1993 when he was 24 and founded his own label, Bad Boy Records, later that year. So how does a 24-year-old...

found a massive record label on his own. Well, when you dig further, you realize it wasn't on his own. It was with the help of Clive Davis, his mentor. And the further into it all you dig, you realize that Clive Davis came out as gay later on. And there's a lot of rumors that him and Diddy were in a relationship throughout this time. This is going to come up over and over and over again.

Just by chance. Clive Davis has been running significant portions of the music industry since our parents were kids listening to music. Responsible for artists like Aretha Franklin, Alicia Keys, The Grateful Dead, then later Usher, Outkast, Pink. But back in the 60s and 70s, like Janis Joplin, Santana, Aerosmith, Pink Floyd, like, come on, read it. And it wasn't just Clive Davis over these people. He was over people, you know, as...

Some of you know, Sherry and I were in music. I was in music. Sherry kind of was a, I guess, a manager to me back 14, 13 years ago. But even before that, in the 90s, you know, that was one of them. But I didn't sleep with anybody, just so you guys know. No, she didn't. Just Chad. That's why I am not a musician now. So you didn't do your job directly. I'm just saying, what the hell? That's why I should have got someone else.

But either way, you know, when you're growing up in the 90s and, you know, these artists like Backstreet Boys, NSYNC, you name it, everybody that was mainstream famous in the 90s, if you looked up who or where they came from, it was typically Clive Davis. Yes. So as an aspiring musician back in the day, I was like, you know, Clive Davis is the guy. He is the man over music. Yeah.

And I always wondered why I didn't make any music, but maybe I just didn't like dudes enough. I don't know. Or you didn't do your damn job. Yeah. That's what I think it is. One of the two. But it's very interesting with Clyde Davis because that is how Diddy really got his start was with Clyde. And then Ian says they were in a relationship. I don't think they were in a relationship. I think that...

Diddy was a victim. It very well could be. Let's listen to some more of this. Specifically claims that they were trying to groom him to do gay stuff, which has long been the talk of the town in the rap industry by people that aren't with it. Diddy allegedly showed him a tape from a secret recording that he just happened to have of of Jones's idol.

having gay sex with some white guy. And then Diddy apparently told Jones that he had engaged in gay sex with this redacted rapper and that redacted rapper and his idol, Stevie J. And apparently he also promised to make sure that Jones would win producer of the year at the Grammys if he did gay stuff on camera. Although to be clear, he wasn't explicitly saying on camera, but Mr.

Mr. Jones discovered that Diddy had hidden cameras in every room of his home. I'm going to guess that Diddy didn't learn how to wire a whole house with cameras on his own. Kanye has accused Diddy of being a fed many times. Diddy's also been accused of ordering the hit on Tupac many times. And when Diddy was asked about this on a podcast, this was his response. We don't talk about...

When you start digging into allegations of the CIA, the FBI, the Mossad having tentacles in the music industry, you wind up at...

Total rumors like this former CIA agent admits agency created gangster rap to fill private prisons by glamorizing criminality. Claims like famous hip hop lyrics of the legendary hip hop outfit NWA were even scripted by a team of psychologists and war propagandists inside the CIA, according to this former agent. Obviously, these are just totally rumors and conspiracy theories. No truth to this whatsoever. But it leads you to people like Lior Cohen, who might be the most influential person in the last hundred years of music.

Because he ran Def Jam and made Jay-Z who he is, including Redman, Method Man, DMX, Ja Rule, Ludacris. But it doesn't stop with rap music. We got Bon Jovi, Mariah Carey, Shania Twain, Elvis Costello, Ashanti, Nickelback, Slipknot, Sum 41, The Killers, Slayer. But then we've also got his protege, Julie Greenwald.

That got elevated through this merger that he brokered and managed the Black Keys, Bruno Mars, Death Capture Cutie, Jason Marantz, Kid Rock, Lupe Fiasco, Wiz Khalifa. That would be this Julie Greenwald. And then we've got Lucian Grange, the CEO of Universal Music Group. He's the one that is directly implicated and named in this lawsuit.

It is alleged that he attended these parties with underage girls and with sex workers, and he knew that they were spiking drinks, etc., etc. But when you're talking about Diddy, you got to also talk about Justin Bieber, who was managed by Scooter Braun, along with Kanye West, Ariana Grande, Demi Lovato, etc. Scooter Braun is a really big player in the modern music industry. We've

We also got Cy, Carly Rae Morris, Martin Garrix, Kanye West, Black Eyed Peas, David Guetta, Lil Dicky.

So you might not remember, but back in the 90s, Tupac and Biggie were both coming up and they were both talking about leaving their records that we've shown the people involved in those records already and starting their own. And Tupac was starting to speak out a little bit, maybe about the state, the nature of the industry. Diddy was close in the middle of that. And there's a lot of rumors that he ordered the hit on Tupac.

Diddy sort of rose to power on the power vacuum of Tupac and Biggie both leaving the scene. And he has been manipulating and running a huge portion of the industry from the inside ever since. And this court case directly alleges with lots of evidence that he has been running a sexual blackmail scheme that entire time.

promoting artists that would engage in the sexual blackmail scheme and then do their bidding there because there's not just him acting alone and pushing out, ostracizing, blacklisting, attacking artists that wouldn't. So maybe you should go back and listen to some of Kanye's interviews and

See if he sounds quite so crazy after all. So as you heard from this Ian Carroll video is this power and control structure of the music industry. You know, when Biggie and Tupac were starting to think about leaving their labels, uh,

Number one, Tupac and Biggie, it was West Coast, East Coast. For those that don't remember, it was a rap battle. It was a gang war is what they were trying to set up from the East Coast side and the West Coast side. You had Tupac, which was heavily rap.

always involved in the West coast side of things. Snoop Dogg was another one over there. You know, Snoop Dogg is, I don't even know how old he is, but he's been around for a while. And so he was kind of involved in all that as well. Then you had Biggie Smalls, you had all the East coast rappers. They were trying to create this kind of gang war between the two sides. And it seemed like as both artists started to figure out how screwed up the music industry actually was, uh,

that's when they started to think about leaving their labels because they knew that their labels had a lot of control that they didn't necessarily agree with. Maybe they didn't agree with the stuff that was going on, but this is how the power of the music industry kind of evolves. And this is exactly what happened. I want to get into some of the testimony so far from this case, Cassie Ventura, uh,

recalled in 2016 a hotel altercation seen on video footage after being shown a clip from the incident during the second day of her testimony. She recounted that Combs

Number two.

Now, for those that don't know who Cassie Ventura is, she was professionally known as Cassie, which I remember her actually. And she was an American singer, model, actress and dancer. She rose to fame in the mid 2000s with her debut single Me and You. That was 2006, which was a hit under Bad Boy Records and obviously under Sean Diddy Combs.

She got into a romantic relationship with Diddy. Cassie and Diddy were in a long term on and off again relationship. And that lasted for about a decade from around 2007 to 2018. And then during their time together, Diddy was not only Cassie's romantic partner, but also her mentor and boss, which created a huge power dynamic that has since come under scrutiny, obviously, in this case.

So when she goes on to talk more about this, Ventura felt disgusted and humiliated by Freak Offs.

Ventura began to cry during her testimony when asked whether she wanted to participate in every freak off. She said that she didn't and she felt disgusted and humiliated by them, but she also didn't want to disappoint Combs. And then there was a shift in their relationship. Ventura recalled Combs looking out for her when she first met Sean Diddy Combs. They fell in love, she said, while spending time together in studio or traveling elsewhere. She quotes, I think I was just enamored by him.

We were just having a good time. It was really fun at this point, she told the court. But as her appearance, transportation, rent and overall lifestyle came under Combs control. Ventura said her music career and record deal eventually took a backseat to allege free costs, which left her feeling humiliated.

She testified that despite recording hundreds of songs and nine albums while she was with Combs, the work was never released because the freak-offs became her job. They took up too much time and energy to leave the room for other pursuits. Ventura said, adding that she would stay up for several days at a time to party, drink, and have sex with strangers. And the freak-offs could last from 36 to 72 hours at a time. And she said with the longest continuum for four days, she recalled them happening almost weekly for years.

And so you're talking about like this artist and this is just one instance of she was up for three to four days. And there were even allegations in this case and or at least in the court documents, especially some of the civil lawsuits where there were men who

that allegedly were giving drugs like the date rape drug where they would pass out and they would be raped. They would have stuff forcefully put inside of them. And it wasn't just women. It was men as well. And these were, in some cases, very famous people that had this done to them. Now, we don't know if this was done to Justin Bieber or Usher or whatever, but we do know that a lot of these big time artists that you know or know or heard of were around this situation when it would happen.

And she said control was everything. Ventura characterized Combs as physically and psychologically abusive throughout the first hours of her testimony. She said control was everything from the way that I looked to the to what I was working on that day, who I was speaking to. She said control was an all around thing to a certain point. Combs allegedly introduced Ventura to freak offs, drug fueled events where he is accused of forcing women to.

to perform sex acts with hired sex workers, which were a focus of the indictment outlined in his alleged crimes. Ventura said Combs broached the idea of sexual encounters involving voyeurism during the first year of their relationship, and he would hire an escort or dancer with whom he would watch her engage while he directed them.

The singer testified she felt confused and nervous, but I also loved him very much and wanted to make him happy. She testified she worried about making Combs angry because of how much control he had over her life and career and the possibility that he could blackmail her by releasing images of the freak offs. Prosecutors allege in court documents that the Combs often recorded these performances with or without participants consent. So we go to the blackmail thing. That's exactly what this was.

And then she said violence occurred frequently in her initial statements before the court. Ventura now pregnant with her third child and married to personal trainer, Alex Fine recalled her and Colm's early interactions and how she started to see a different side of him over time.

She said she met Combs when she was a newly signed singer at 19 and their friendship became romantic. Two years later, she also described her alleged violence throughout their 10 year off and on relationship or counting instance where he knocked her over, kicked and dragged her and stomped on her head, causing black eyes and bruises on her body.

And when asked Ventura said that the abuse she endured happened frequently. Combs is seen attacking Ventura in video footage CNN obtained and published last year, which shows him throwing her to the floor, kicking and dragging her in the hallway of a Los Angeles hotel room. And this is what obviously has kind of been everywhere. This was.

Kind of breaking down the first day of testimony from Cassie Ventura, which then leads us to what has happened since then. Well, and Daniel Phillip, who was a dancer, I guess. I don't know if you want to call him a prostitute, but they hired him to have sex with Ventura.

And he testified to the same thing, that there were points where Diddy took Ventura into another room and he could hear him slapping him around or slapping her around and hitting her because she didn't want to participate in some form or another with these freak offs with him. And then she comes back in the room and Daniel Phillips appears.

Sex worker. Yeah. He was just like wanting to hold her and say, it's okay. Get away from this guy. What are you doing? You know, he felt so bad because he was paid to have sex with her and he couldn't do anything to help her. Yeah. You know, this obviously is setting up this whole thing with Diddy. Like, were people forced into sex? Were people forced into certain circumstances? And we're going to get into Diddy's charges and what it actually carries, the potential sentences, all of that. But,

Combs family, including his mother and children, they've all been present with him in the courtroom so far in the trial. On the first day, his daughters briefly left the courtroom during the graphic testimony involving sex acts. Ventura's husband also left the courtroom many times during a lot of this testimony. It was pretty brutal testimony.

And so some of the testimony, I'll just go ahead and tell you guys, like literally Diddy asked the sex performer guy to urinate in her mouth and it choked her. Yeah, it was really bad. Yeah, it's nuts. Now, there are dozens of women and men that have filed lawsuits against Combs since 2023, alleging physical and sexual abuse. And many of those accusers claim to have been drugged and then abused while incapacitated.

Most of these allegations, however, are not part of the criminal case. So in addition to Ventura, there are three other women expected to testify and they'll be testifying using pseudonyms. So Jane Doe, victim one, whatever, victim two, victim three. Very similar to what we saw in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.

So Cassie returned to the stand Wednesday, which is today. And like Tuesday, she was wearing another turtleneck dress and a blazer. She took the blazer off as she began her testimony. Prior to returning to Ventura, returning to the stand, the judge was addressing a note from a juror.

And talking about privacy screens for the viewing of some of these videos. And during this time, that is when Cassie Ventura's husband got up and walked away. And he just could not hear a lot of this stuff about the videos that the jury was going to see.

But then questions return about Suge Knight and weapons. And so prosecutors asked Ventura about her testimony Tuesday regarding Combs' concern about Suge Knight. And Ventura explained that guns were taken from a safe and they were put on their bodies. Ventura also said Combs asked her to make sure that the escorts involved in encounters. Ventura testified that she did so by telling them that she wasn't a cop, which is something she said Combs told her to say.

For those that don't know who Suge Knight is, Suge Knight was like the bad boy of the rap industry. He was kind of like the equalizer. If you guys have ever saw that movie with Denzel Washington, this guy was, I guess, implicated or known as someone that would murder the shit out of you if you kind of stepped out of line. I think he was in some ways kind of the...

the, the intimidator, uh, with a lot of these people to make sure that whatever they were told to do, and I'm talking about combs and all the rest that he made sure they did. And he's in prison now, by the way, for murdering someone. Yeah. And at one point, Diddy thought that Cassie was involved with Suge Knight and he blew up his car. Yeah. Yeah.

Diddy blew up Suge Knight's car. So that tells me alone that especially considering how most people looked at Suge Knight, such as powerful figure that Sean Combs felt like he was much more powerful than Suge Knight. But Ventura on the aftermath of the hotel incident caught on video. Testimony returned to the infamous video of Combs beating Ventura in a hotel hallway and Ventura was shown a clip from the incident.

Mm-hmm.

And Ventura testified that she replied, it should be okay. From time to time, Ventura rubs her pregnant belly on the stand today. And so she's kind of trying to portray this like, Hey, I'm pregnant, whatever. And, and I'm not saying it's bad, but what I am saying is, is that at one point in time, prosecution and defense have been talking about showing some of these videos where Cassie was involved in some of this stuff. And some people say, maybe it's not good to show the jury, uh,

her involvement in some of these videos, because as she is on the stand as a pregnant woman now, which is a good thing for the prosecution to kind of give that, that, that viewpoint. And I know this sounds bad what I'm saying, but if you show the jury, these videos where maybe in some of these videos, she looks like a willing participant. We, it seems like at least she was drugged. And a lot of these cases, she may look willing when she, you know, when you're completely drugged, but she,

That's kind of been the big debate. Should we show these videos with Cassie in it, especially since she is going to be likely the star witness? But what's crazy is the defense. They had an argument on the first day that she took the stand. They didn't want her to take the stand while the jury was in the room. They wanted her behind the seat so they couldn't see that she was pregnant because it could...

Show some type of sympathy. Yeah, she was pregnant. But that's why there's been the big debate about whether or not you show the videos with Cassie involved in some of this stuff, because it may shed a different light on her to the jury. So there's been a big thing on that. And so here's a quote from today. It says you are sick for thinking it's OK to do what you've done. Ventura testified she did not know whether or not police responded to the Intercontinental Hotel where the incident took place, as Combs claimed.

She testified she took a selfie after the incident, which showed her with a fat lip and wearing sunglasses. She said she wore the sunglasses to cover a black eye. And Combs continued to text her, claiming police were at the hotel asking for her to call him immediately. Ventura testified she testified she responded to him by saying that was supposed to attend a premiere. And now she had a black eye. She says you are sick for thinking it's OK to do what you've done. Ventura texted, please stay far away from me.

Combs then said, I'm getting arrested. Combs continued to text Ventura, writing that if she doesn't pick up, she'll never hear his voice again and won't pick up her calls. And she says, I'm getting arrested, he text. Ventura testified she was unaware of whether or not he was being arrested, but she texts back, plugging my phone in and going to bed. You should do the same, Ventura replied.

She also said, And it quotes,

And then after the hotel accident, Combs went to her apartment. Ventura testified that Combs showed up at her apartment after the incident at the hotel, yelling again and banging Ventura testified just commotion. She added it was pretty normal. She then went to the house of a member of the security team named D-Rock because she didn't know many people in Los Angeles. And D-Rock and his wife were always there for her. Ventura testified.

Combs then came to D-Rock's house and she went with him back to Combs' home to prepare for her premiere. Prosecutors showed a photo from the premiere which faintly shows a bruise on her shoulder. Ventura said she used makeup to cover up the bruises on her face and wore a long dress to cover bruises on her legs.

Now, there's a photo that shows bruises. Pictures were displayed from the after party of the premiere. And in the photo, Ventura is wearing a shorter dress and a bruise could be seen on her right shin. Ventura testified that she had a larger bruise on her thigh that couldn't be seen. And testimony then to other escorts used during freak offs as the prosecutor showed additional photos and listed some names. Now, if you guys have saw this video we're talking about in this hotel with Diddy kicking the shit out of Cassie.

You'll know that you don't have to try to look for bruises on her body. He is literally dragging her down the hallway all the way into where the elevators are. And then he kicks her head. He's kicking her in other areas of her body. This was obviously kind of showing a moment of who did he really is.

The weird thing about this is a lot of people have said, well, you know, we want to play this video down the juror's throat. And although, yeah, you probably should do that to try to set up his character, which is what I believe that the prosecution is trying to do here. Very similar to Alec Murdoch and his case down in South Carolina to where, you know, he killed his wife and son. But what the prosecution didn't have, which was a.

iron clad case necessarily for sure that Alec Murdoch committed the murders against his wife and son. But what they did have was all of his corruption and all and all the ways that he screwed all the people out of money throughout his career. And so they use that heavily in his murder trial. And although you might think like, well, how are you going to use that

In a murder trial in so many people were questioned, well, is that why he was actually convicted of murder? It wasn't necessarily that the prosecution or the law enforcement had all the evidence that he actually did kill his son and wife. But it was just we wanted to paint a picture of his character to then paint the picture to the jury that as they're thinking through this stuff, they're like, well, we did see that video over and over and over again.

So he's a piece of shit. We should convict him for sure. And that's what prosecution can do at times. And I'm not saying that he shouldn't be convicted, but I'm just saying that what he is charged with, you have to stick by what he's charged with. Yeah. But during these texts that he text her when she was in the Uber with the black eye and the fat lip,

This is a typical abuser. This is what they do after the fact. They say, oh, my gosh, poor me. I'm getting arrested. You got to get over here. You got to do this. They change the table and they put it on the victim. And this is what abusers do. And I know for sure he was abusive physically, mentally, every way possible. But that's not what the charges are about.

The charges are about racketeering, sex trafficking, drugs, sex.

weapons, all that. Can they use an abusive relationship for these charges? Well, so here's the actual charges. Racketeering conspiracy or RICO. Now, the allegation is Combs is accused of orchestrating a criminal enterprise referred to by prosecutors as the Combs Enterprise, which allegedly engaged in patterns of illegal activities such as sex trafficking, forced labor, kidnapping, bribery and obstruction of justice.

Now, the potential penalty for this is up to 20 years in federal prison per count. However, if the racketeering acts include crimes like kidnapping or sexual exploitation, the sentence can be significantly higher, potentially up to life in prison. And then you have sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion.

And Combs is charged with coercing women, including underage victims, into participating in sex acts through manipulation, threats and drug use. And these acts were allegedly organized during events known as freak offs, which involved a drug fueled sexual encounter that was often recorded without consent and used for blackmail. And so this penalty carries a 15 year prison sentence with the possibility of a life sentence if convicted.

Transportation for the purpose of prostitution. Now, this allegation is the charge involves the alleged transportation of individuals across state lines to engage in prostitution under coercive circumstances. And this carries up to 10 years in federal prison. Then you have forced labor. Coms is accused of compelling individuals to perform labor or services through threats, coercion or abusive legal processes.

This carries up to 20 years in prison with increased penalties if the offense involves aggravated circumstances. And then you have obstruction of justice and bribery. Prosecutors allege that Combs attempted to obstruct justice by bribing law enforcement officers and intimidating potential witnesses to prevent them from testifying or cooperating with authorities. Each count can carry up to five years in prison with additional fines and penalties depending on the severity and impact of the obstruction. So,

We have massive charges on Diddy and, but they do have to make some of these charges stick and they got to prove it beyond reasonable doubt. And especially when we're talking about the racketeering and also even the sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion, these are going to be the biggest numbers as far as how long he may stay in prison. Cause if they cannot get him on the racketeering conspiracy, which is Rico, uh, it's going to be a much different outcome for how long he may actually stay in prison. Yeah.

Yeah. The defense is going to have to prove that these people weren't coerced into having sexual acts with other people and with him. Yeah. They're going to have to prove that. And they do have three other witnesses that I know are going to testify. But one of the witnesses is refusing at this time to even testify.

Is that because he's blackmailed them or they're scared or what's going on with that? It could be either. Right. I mean, there's something probably happened with that. And will we know what actually happened that we don't know. But I do want to play this quick video. T.

TMZ has kind of been all over this, this whole trial, and he does a very, very good job of what happened and some of the very graphic descriptions of what was talked about in trial just yesterday. And as Cassie Ventura testified, he also makes some good points on, you know, the prosecution did a pretty good job, but there's definitely things they lack in.

when we're trying to convict Diddy on these massive charges to where, you know, if you want to cut off the head of the snake, even though he's not the head of the snake, he's just one little certain section of that snake. But what did the prosecution do? Good. What they do bad. I think that TMZ does a pretty good job summing this up and we're going to break it down. Listen here.

Day two of the Diddy trial, prosecutors won. They didn't necessarily win for the reasons you might think. I will say that I think there was a problem prosecutors had, but we have an update at the end of this video where something happened in real time that could change everything. There was damning testimony, and I think this is why the prosecutors won today.

that Cassie said on the stand that Diddy would threaten to release videos of the freak-off with her in it. Various freak-offs, she said. That's extortion.

And what the prosecution needs to prove is force or coercion. And there is no doubt, I think, in any jury's mind that if you say to somebody, I'm going to release video of you in a freak off, that's extortion, except what it requires is this.

unless you do something or unless you don't do something. She has not closed that loop yet. She hasn't said he threatened to release video of the freak-offs unless I participated in more of them. If she said that squarely, case over as far as I'm concerned. That's coercion and that's enough, I think, for the jury to convict.

She hasn't completed that loop and said the threat to release the freak-off videos was so she would do X. She hasn't said that squarely. But there's certainly an intimation there that he was forcing her to do things. Is that enough? I don't know. But it's certainly something. And it's important if he's holding something like that over her head.

Now, the reason I said that it's not what you think in terms of why the prosecutors won is, I think that statement about threatening to release the videos is really damning. But the other stuff that came out in the case, I don't know.

I don't know that the jury is going to find necessarily force or coercion because it's not just what's in Cassie's head, what she fears. It's what Diddy either communicates or insinuates. I didn't hear that today. So I want to give you a couple of examples of this. Okay. So

They talked about, I'm going to read this actually from a transcript of the hearing. We have a transcript. So here's what it says. Prosecutor, do you recall all of the freak-offs? Cassie, that would be impossible. Prosecutor, did you want to stop? She says, yes. I was humiliated. I didn't have those words then. I couldn't talk to anybody about it.

Prosecutor, did you tell him you didn't want to? She says, yes. And then she says, I brought it up gently. I didn't want him to just do it with someone else. Remember, they were boyfriend and girlfriend at the time. Were you able to express your concerns to him?

And the defense objects. The prosecutor rephrases the question. Why would you talk to him gently? She says, I didn't want him to be angry. So, yes, she says, I talked to him gently. What does gently mean? What does that mean?

And you know that on cross-examination, the defense is going to raise that issue. What did you mean by saying you brought it up gently? Because again, it's not what's in her head. It is what he either says or insinuates to cause coercion or create force.

I want to stop for a second because obviously the defense is going to tear this up. They're going to say, OK, well, are you a victim or are you not? They're going to try to paint her as a maybe even a co-conspirator or a willing participant. That is what the defense wants to do here. Obviously, Diddy and Cassie were boyfriend and girlfriend this time. And even when she said, I didn't want him to do this with someone else.

So she was like, I'm volunteering to do this because I don't want to do this to someone else. I'm going to be a part of this. I'm going to volunteer for this. It's kind of how this sounds. And if you're the defense, you're going to go on that and you're going to harp on that and you're going to tear that down. You're going to say, well, you know, you were a willing participant. You had an opportunity at this time to stop what was going on, uh,

And what you said was, well, I didn't want him to do it with someone else. That's like saying that, well, I had sex with my wife. And the reason I had sex with my wife, even though she was forcing me to have sex with my wife or vice versa, husband, the same thing. I didn't want him to have sex with someone else. Right. I mean, there are people that literally have sex with their spouses because they don't want them to go out and cheat, but they don't want them to go out and have sex with other people. So at what point during this line of questioning,

is Cassie really portraying herself as a, as a victim, as a sex trafficked woman and,

Because or by force or coercion, when one of the main things here is you're saying I didn't want him to do it with someone else. Well, I think the two words are three words are four words or whatever it is. I didn't want him to get it mad. What does that mean? I didn't want him to get mad. I didn't want him to beat my ass. I didn't want him to give me a black eye. I didn't want him to kick me in the chest. I didn't want him to physically hurt me. I didn't want him to drug me like that.

They have to get into that testimony more. Yeah. Why have they not? Yeah. Why have they not? Why as a prosecutor, would you not then go through the line of questioning? And I'm not an attorney, but you know, on the basis of that, if I'm a prosecutor and I'm asking these questions and she's answering them in this way,

I would have then went on and said, well, why would you be worried about whether he was mad or not? Why were you fearful of that? What was going to happen if you didn't comply? Yeah. What were you fearful of? What do you think would have happened? Has there ever been anything else happened that led you to the fear that if you did not cooperate during this particular event, that it would have led to maybe something that's happened in the past, even though it's kind of leading statements? Yeah.

But what I'm saying is you got to ask those questions as far as let's break this down, because you can't just leave it open by her saying, well, I didn't want him to do it with someone else. That just looks a little suspicious. And for a jury, they may say, well, look,

I know she's pregnant right now. She's rubbed her belly on the stand, but that's also been the fear of the prosecution. Why they don't necessarily know if they want to share the video of Cassie in these videos, because it will potentially shed light on her in a different way from the

the differential of her appearance in court as a pregnant lady with a, uh, boyfriend and someone that, you know, is completely out of that world now, at least from what we understand and know. And listen, I'm, I'm saying this too. I'm not on either side. I definitely think Cassie is a victim. And I think sometimes you can become a victim without realization of you being a victim to where you feel like maybe this is just the way it is. It's a normal thing. And well,

Well, you don't realize until long later that she came into this dating P. Diddy, who is this famous rap artist that had this record label. And he was, you know, very high and tight with everyone. Like he was a big name. And a lot of people are like, oh, my gosh, I'm starstruck and I'm in love with this guy and I'm going to do anything I can to make him happy. And she's an aspiring musician. Keep in mind. And Cassie was someone I actually remember Cassie being an artist back in the day.

So she was an aspiring musician. She wanted to become famous and,

And what was her pathway to fame? It was Diddy. She was right in his house. She is, it's like, it's like people, I mean, this sounds, this is a really bad example. I should not even say this, but it's like people aspiring to be a Christian, aspiring to know what the truth is about Jesus. And then, you know, uh, five months later, you somehow wind up in Jesus's house. Right. And you're like, and I know that's a horrible example, but,

But what I'm saying is it's like this is someone that you felt like was so far out of reach that you just, you know, you would never, ever get to this level of notoriety, maybe, or just in the company of someone like Diddy. And this was Cassie. She was she was aspiring. She was 19 years old. She wanted all these things. And then all of a sudden she somehow connected to Diddy, got into this world. And so these people are willing sometimes to do any and everything to get famous.

And that sounds nuts. It may even apply to Justin Bieber. It may even apply to Usher. It may even apply to all these other artists. But at some point in time, you know, you have to understand that fame is not worth your morality. Fame is not worth the lifelong just scar in your soul, in your mind of what you had to go through to get fame. And I think that there's that's why so many people in the in Hollywood, in fame, they kill themselves because

Or they get addicted to drugs is because of sometimes what they had to do to get to the point of fame. Yeah, what they have to endure. And it's not necessarily something they want to do. They feel like they have to do it. But I think she felt like she had to do it, not only because she felt like she was in love with him, but maybe to enhance her career as well. But what it sounds like, her career went nowhere. Instead of being a musician, she was on these freak offs every week. Yeah. Yeah.

Yeah, they utilized her for the freak offs, even though I think she did. Like I said, I think she had probably two or three songs released. I think she was featured with Diddy in a couple songs. I remember that name back in the day. But like I said, and like the court documents say, I think they utilize her more for the freak offs than they did.

Her actually becoming famous or a musician. And when you talk about they did, there is a lot of other people behind the they did besides just Diddy. I'm talking about his whole staff. They arranged all these freak offs. Even when they went to hotels, they made sure they had extra bed linens. They made sure they had the body oil.

They made sure they had everything in place ready to go. And then after these freak off that lasted two to four days, they left these rooms a mess. There was body oil all over the place. There was blood. It was disgusting. They would have to pay thousands of dollars to have these hotel rooms redone. Yeah, it's nuts. Let's listen to some more of TMZ's report on this. Okay, that's one example. Here's another one. And this gets a little bit graphic. Okay.

Prosecutor, did you want to be urinated on? You know it came out with the sex worker who testified earlier that he would urinate at Diddy's direction on Cassie during the freak-offs. So prosecutor, did you want to be urinated on? Defense, objection. And they get into the objection, the judge overrules it, and she says, no, I did not want it. Prosecutor, how did it feel?

Cassie, it was disgusting. It was too much. I choked. No one could think I wanted it. Prosecutor, why were you choking? Cassie, too much urine in my mouth. Prosecutor, who else urinated on you? Cassie, Sean. So it wasn't just the sex worker. It was Sean, according to Cassie. Did you want Sean to urinate on you? Cassie, I didn't want anyone to urinate on me.

Prosecutor, how often did it happen? Answer, often enough. And then, prosecutor, why didn't you say no? And this is what the defense is going to seize on. Cassie, it was obvious I didn't want to be on the ground being urinated on by two men. And then she says she never explicitly consented. Well, here's the thing about that.

She says she didn't explicitly consent. The real issue is, did she explicitly object? And that, again, is what the defense is going to seize on in this case, that to convict Diddy, you have to show he did this against her will. He forced her to do it. He coerced her into doing it. And

I don't feel like that loop has been closed yet. Now, it may be because she's still on the stand and maybe they will close it. But I don't know. You would think that when they go down that line of questioning, they would have closed that loop then and they didn't.

So a lot of this is insinuation. And what is in Cassie's head? Now, look, I am not saying that, oh, well, she should have said, I don't want to be urinated on because most people don't want to be urinated on. And that's pretty obvious. And you take her at her word that she didn't want to. And I get it. To convict him, he has to somehow overtake her free will. Did she express that clearly?

free will enough for him to have objected either directly or by insinuation. I don't know. This jury may just say, this is on its face disgusting. Nobody wants it. He knew it. He made her do it again. He degraded her. That's enough. Guilty. They may say that. But what if a juror in that deliberation room raises an issue

and says, wait a minute, if you look at the jury instruction, it says you got to see force or coercion or duress.

Where is the forced coercion addressed? Then they start getting into, well, Cassie said she didn't like it. And then some other juror says, well, did she say it? And did he say you're doing it anyway? That would be the most direct thing. And so far, not seeing that. Maybe they think because of the power dynamic, it's obvious enough. I'm not advocating one side or another here. I'm just trying to give you, based on a lot of experience I've had, a

in court and covering cases that this is what juries do. And they could go either way on it. I just thought that this testimony specifically, based on the U.S. attorney coming out in this news conference, really strong.

Making, at least made me think, wow, they've got evidence that he forced her, that he said it. And that's what I took away from that news conference with the U.S. attorney. And it's kind of what I got from the indictment. I thought she was going to close that loop and I didn't hear it.

Now, again, that doesn't mean a jury wouldn't convict him because there are all sorts of reasons that a jury would say it's obvious. I mean, this is a powerful, powerful guy. She is under his thumb. So they could go that way. I'm just surprised that it didn't go as far as I thought it was going to go.

All right. I want to pause here because, you know, when you're hearing this, the urinating on Cassie, that is a humiliation thing. It is a thing that shows that I have the power. I have the control. We also think about this with R. Kelly.

That's why R Kelly's in jail. He was urinating on people too. I don't know what it is about rappers and urinating on, on women or people, whoever, but they have a thing about it. And also, I mean, if you want to get into like some of the deep, dark depths of just freaky, weird shit, um,

There are people that are into that as well. And so we don't know for 100 percent sure whether or not that some of these people that participated, whether willingly or unwillingly, may have been, you know, OK with this at a time. And then in hindsight, thinking back with everything and then a prosecutor or a district attorney or whoever comes to them and says, hey.

we understand that you're a part of this diddy thing. What can you tell us? And then they encourage these women to say, well, yeah, then come to trial for us. Tell us about your experiences. And I think in some ways, maybe I'm just speculating, but maybe that's why Cassie is a little bit standoffish as far as she's not dominating in a way that she's accusing him that he was forcing her to do this rather than that's why she won't go all the way there.

I kind of disagree with what he was saying, just because that's why they showed what happened in the hotel when he dragged her by her hair. He kicked her. They showed about her black eye and her fat lip in the Uber. They're showing a consistency of him battering her, beating her up if she does not do what he asked her to do. Yeah, I 100 percent agree with that. And, you know, to the latter part of this clip we're listening to.

you know, we're not on trial for domestic violence. But to what your point is, Sherry, it does show a pattern. It shows the control structure. It shows how

he was over her. It shows that even in that particular video to where she had her ass beat and drug down a hallway when she had a premiere to go to the next morning. Yeah. Yeah. And she still didn't call the police. And even the night where this Phillips guy, he was testifying. He said when Cassie was not performing the way that did he wanted to, he took her in another room and he could hear him slapping her. Hmm.

And then they came back in the room to have sex some more. Yeah, that is coercion. Yeah, absolutely. I 100 percent agree with that. And like I said, it does absolutely show how much control he had over her. There's no question. I want to get to the last part of this clip, and then we're going to get into a little bit of the conspiracy with John Pelletier and how he may be involved with Diddy and the fact that the guy that was.

At the Las Vegas shootings and the Maui fires also shows up in the Diddy case. Insane.

Domestic violence. There is a lot of domestic violence in this case. And it is clear that Sean Combs used domestic violence as a tool in his toolbox. That's pretty obvious. And, you know, Cassie testified that there were times when she would have to hide in a hotel room for a week so the bruises on her face would heal.

So there is absolutely no doubt. Well, I mean, there's no doubt just based on the Cassie video that Diddy was brutal. Thing is, the defense is admitting that. They admitted it to the jury in opening statements.

And, you know, the thing is that domestic violence is a state crime. And this is not a domestic violence charge that he faces. You know, this involves sex workers and interstate commerce and all of that. So, you know, his position is, look, this was mutual domestic violence. And, you know, he will point to what he says were abuses by Cassie

Again, I don't know that that airplane flies because when you look at his size versus hers, you know, I don't know that's going to work. But, you know, they brought up that they want to introduce into evidence a plane

evidence of a bar fight Cassie was in where she wanted to kill somebody when she was high on drugs. So they're going to try to bring that in to show this kind of mutual domestic violence. Again, I don't know if that's going to work, but ultimately this is not a domestic violence case. And I think that's one of the things. Now, I want to raise one other point and then I'll stop, I promise. The other point I want to raise is

is the freak-off videos. A prosecution said they want to admit it into evidence, at least one of them.

And the defense started objecting, saying they didn't want the media to see it. They haven't done that yet. And it's unclear whether the judge will clear the courtroom, whether the judge will let the jury see it away from the media, whether they sit there with, you know, some kind of a screen where the people in the courtroom can't see it other than the jurors. I don't know whether they do that or not.

I don't know what the freak-off video shows. Does it show Combs in any way coercing or forcing her? It's going to be really relevant. The thing that I thought about was that Cassie is coming to court very, very pregnant. And that is hard for the jury to reconcile with these stories about freak-offs with Cassie involved and all. And that's the image of Cassie they see.

If they see that video, I'm just thinking as a prosecutor, what do you do? Because now all of a sudden the jury says, oh, yeah, that was her back in the day, you know, when she was involved in this. And she is a very different person from we see now. Do you want to create that dichotomy?

In a way, in a weird way, that might be a risk for the prosecution. I saw this on Law and Crime, I think it was. It's like if you want to introduce videos of freak-offs where it shows and betrays Cassie in this environment. Now, the interesting thing is the defense objected to this. They did not want the jury to see these freak-offs. What does that mean to me? It means that it may paint Diddy in a more sinister light than it paints Cassie. Because if...

obviously Diddy with the amount of money that he has to hire the defense team that he has, they would be thinking through all of the things that we've been talking about. And the one thing I'm sure they have come to the conclusion of is that likely it's going to hurt Diddy showing these freak off videos more than it's going to hurt Cassie. And in, in, in the event of that,

it doesn't make a shit whether she's pregnant right now in a courtroom. And then they also see her being abused as a woman in a freak off party. And if you guys have saw the video of, of, of Diddy just abusing the shit of her in this hotel room, look,

There are women that are feisty. Sherry's feisty. There's a lot of women that are feisty that can hold their own. But you're still a man. And especially Diddy. Diddy's a big dude. He's like 6'1", 6'2". Decently muscular. I'm not going to say he's like crazy muscular, but he's decently muscular. Stronger than Cassie is. And it just goes back to it's probably not going to go well for Diddy showing these videos about...

This masculine media mogul that has power and control over some young aspiring artist in a situation that has been depicted not only in in trial, but also in court documents. It's not going to go well for Diddy. And people are going to look at this and look at him like a piece of shit.

And they're going to look past whether or not she was an active or willing participant or not. Doesn't matter. It's going to look very bad. I want to get into this as well, because this is some of the conspiracy stuff around this. Obviously, the trial is going to continue on throughout this week. And I think the biggest testimony you have heard we with the clip we just played, the urination, the.

Alleged allegations from Cassie as far as how did he controlled her and maybe why she didn't want to participate, but she couldn't say that she didn't want to participate. Maybe it was the power control and she was scared of him. You've heard the biggest part of what's happened so far in trial. And there are other witnesses that are going to get on the stand and they're going to talk about their involvement. But I also want to bring up John Pelletier. This is the law enforcement officer, the captain.

in Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department during the time of the Las Vegas shootings. As we said, he went over to Maui during the time of the Maui fires, and then he was also involved in the Diddy case. And I'm going to explain exactly how he was involved in the Diddy case, but just to kind of

recap and refresh your memory of who John Pelletier is and his lineage. I want you to listen to this clip and then I'll break down how he's involved in Diddy case. County mayor Richard Bisson is calling for the police chief, John Pelletier to be on leave after he was named in a lawsuit, tying him to Hollywood celebrity, Sean Diddy Combs. But wait a second. Isn't that guy also the same guy that was in

My name is John Pelletier. I'm a captain with the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. But wait, there's more. And this article says John Pelletier led response to 2017 Vegas. No, no, there's there's still more as possible. That's that's what we're sharing here internally. That is possible that there will be many children. So this article says, as Maui students return to school, many children among 850 missing children.

after deadly fires. Missing kids again. Weird. You can't make this up, man. I oversee the major violator and narcotics bureau. Former Metro Police Captain is refuting claims that he was involved in a cover-up related to Sean Diddy Combs. In a criminal complaint, it alleges that current Maui Police Chief John Pelletier

was hired to provide security for Combs back in 2018. It claims Pelletier posed as a sheriff's deputy in California to respond to an alleged gang rape involving Combs. The complaint also claims all defendants directly committed violations of aiding, abetting, and inducing the sex trafficking venture and sex trafficking of plaintiffs in this suit.

We got Jim. Look back at his history here with the department shows that he was actually praised for his dedication to sexual assault prevention, which may be surprising for some, given the allegations of this lawsuit. So let me see if I got this straight. The same guy that was the commanding officer at the time of the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, which

to this day is extremely hard to explain and doesn't make any sense at all for a mountain of reasons that I can't go into because it would make the video way too long. Clearly seems to be a very manufactured event. That same commander is also the guy who was in charge when Maui gets hit with the biggest wildfire in history and tons of kids go missing randomly.

And then coincidentally, he now gets named in the Diddy case as somebody who, while he was in Vegas, was over the major violator and narcotics bureau in Las Vegas. And that he was there for more than 22 years and is being named in the case with Diddy.

So as you just heard, this is John Pelletier and I'm calling him Pelletier, not Pelletier, whatever the hell he wants his name to be is Pelletier. And this is the Maui police chief that has been named as a co-defendant in a civil lawsuit filed in March of 2025, alleging his involvement in covering up a 2018 gang rape incident in Arenda, California.

Now, the lawsuit filed by Ashley Parham and two other plaintiffs claimed that Pelletier, then a Las Vegas police captain, posed as a Contra Costa County Sheriff's deputy in response to Parham's 911 call reporting the alleged assault. Now, Parham alleges that Pelletier instructed her to go home without offering assistance or medical care and handled everything.

and handed an envelope believed to contain cash to a neighbor. Additionally, the suit accuses Pelletier of forcefully taken to other individuals from Las Vegas to California, restraining them and then preventing them from conducting legal counsel. Now the lawsuit also named Sean Diddy Combs, NFL player, Odell Buckham Jr. and comedian Drew ski as defendants, a legend, their direct involvement in the assault. Now,

Now, Chief Palantir has categorically denied the allegations, labeling them as completely false and baseless. He provided evidence, including debit card transactions and affidavits from Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department colleagues to demonstrate that he was in Las Vegas on the date of the alleged incident where he kidnapped these people that were tied to the Diddy case.

making it improbable for him to have been in California. Now, Belotere also challenged the identification of a photograph presented in the lawsuit, which purportedly shows him at a 2018 Super Bowl event with Sean Diddy Combs. He asserts that he has never attended a Super Bowl or has been in Minnesota where the event took place.

And so in response to the lawsuit, Maui County Mayor Richard Bisson recommended that Maui Police Commissioner place Palantir on administrative leave pending further investigation, but

And so if you guys have not dove into the Las Vegas shooting conspiracy and the coverup, please go and listen to our series on the Las Vegas route 91 shootings. Please go listen to that. Also go listen to our John Pelletier episode about the Maui fires and the connections with Diddy. We also have an episode on that. Go listen to all of those because this all kind of ties into the Diddy trial and the Diddy case.

How are all of these things connected? We do not for sure know, but we know they are connected. We always say there is no such thing as coincidences.

But guys, that's going to do it for this episode. Make sure you continue to follow our podcast for the latest on the Sean Diddy Combs trial. And as we said in the last episode, we are going to do the Book of Enoch series with the Giants and the Nephilim and the Watchers. I'm just not quite ready. I think that'll be our next episode. So just make sure that you keep your eye out for that.

And until next time, we love each of you all very much. The name of the song is L.A. Made You Crazy because I think L.A. makes a lot of people crazy, including Diddy and all the other. Yeah, I feel I feel a little crazy right now, too. There you go. Until next time, guys, we love you. Peace out. And there's no way I can beat it because I got no chance, no chance when it comes to love.

She got the glitter and the fame And I, I just wasn't enough for you I wish you could be happy But I can't lie, lie, lie LA made you crazy, crazy, yeah, yeah You don't care what's real no more, no This is goodbye, goodbye Made you crazy, crazy, yeah, yeah See you're so recent I can't leave all the boy you need

I wish you could be happy, but I can't lie, lie, lie. L.A. made you crazy, crazy, yeah, yeah. You don't care what's real no more, no, you don't want me anymore. You want what you can't

♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪