cover of episode I love the contradiction of religions

I love the contradiction of religions

2024/11/26
logo of podcast Derek Sivers

Derek Sivers

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
D
Derek Sivers
Topics
Derek Sivers: 作者分享了自己对宗教的看法转变。起初,由于没有宗教信仰背景,作者认为所有宗教都显得荒谬。但随着对不同世界观的深入了解,作者开始欣赏宗教信仰的多样性和复杂性,并对研究不同世界观产生了浓厚兴趣。作者的朋友中,有人坚信印度教神话中梵天、湿婆和毗湿奴的字面描述,也有人相信计算机模拟理论。作者并不试图判断哪种观点正确,而是欣赏这种矛盾的存在。 朋友A: (假设朋友A是相信印度教神话的朋友) 朋友A坚信印度教神话中关于梵天、湿婆和毗湿奴起源的描述是绝对真实的,并详细解释了相关的宇宙循环理论(Kalpa cycle)。她认为这些事件发生在时间之前,是客观事实。 朋友B: (假设朋友B是相信计算机模拟理论的朋友) 朋友B确信我们目前生活在一个计算机模拟的世界中,并能提供严谨的逻辑论证来支持这一观点。 其他朋友: 其他朋友则坚信《塔纳赫》和基督教圣经中的所有内容都是字面意义上的真实事件,包括亚当和夏娃由泥土和肋骨创造,挪亚活到950岁,以及天堂、地狱、天使和撒旦的存在。他们认为这些都是不容置疑的真理。

Deep Dive

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Hi, I'm Derek Sivers and this is I Love the Contradiction of Religions. Because I was raised with no religion, I used to think they were all ridiculous. But now that I'm trying to understand all the worldviews, I find the subject fascinating. My super smart scientist friend tells me about Brahma and Shiva emerging from the navel and forehead of Vishnu.

I ask, wait, wait, do you mean literally or figuratively? Is this a fable or metaphor? She insists it's absolute fact and it happened before time. She tells me very seriously about the Kalpa cycle and how this all works. Another friend, way smarter than me, has no doubt we are all in a computer simulation right now and has an airtight argument why.

Other friends are 100% sure that everything in the Tanakh and Christian Bible is true. Adam and Eve made of clay and rib, Noah lived to be 950 years old, heaven and hell, angels and Satan, all of it literal fact. So a billion people know one collection of facts to be absolutely indisputably true,

and another billion people know a different and completely contradictory collection of facts to be absolutely, indisputably true. Both insist they are right, and therefore others are wrong. So, which one is right? All? None? I have no idea or opinion. I love the contradiction and don't want it resolved.

To pick a side would clash with my goal of understanding each point of view.