KPMG makes the difference by creating value, like developing strategic insights that help drive M&A success, or embedding AI solutions into your business to sustain competitive advantage. KPMG. Make the difference. Learn more at www.kpmg.us slash insights. Welcome to HBR on Leadership, case studies and conversations with the world's top business and management experts.
hand-selected to help you unlock the best in those around you. A CEO's involvement in B2B sales, while often well-intentioned, can sometimes backfire. Christoph Sen is a marketing professor at INSEAD, and he spent years studying the role top leaders play in B2B relationships.
In this episode, he shares the five archetypes of CEO behavior when it comes to sales, which ones are the most effective in closing a deal or nurturing a client relationship, and where they fall short. You'll also learn what to do if your CEO is either overly involved or not involved enough in deals, and why knowing your CEO's archetype can be helpful. This episode originally aired on HBR IdeaCast in February 2021. Here it is.
Welcome to the HBR IdeaCast from Harvard Business Review. I'm Curt Nikish. Closing a big sale with an important client is stressful enough. Imagine bringing a top executive into that make-or-break meeting.
That's what happened in one case that today's guest studied. An account manager had the division president join the final negotiation. But when the client suddenly asked for more price reductions, that executive was so hell-bent on sealing the deal, they were about to agree to something that would have cost the firm $2 million. Horrified and dumbstruck, the account manager faked a heart attack to end the meeting early.
It's not uncommon for CEOs to engage strategic customers around key negotiations, but there's a fine line between successful outcomes and counterproductive disasters. Our guest today has spent years researching the role of top leaders in B2B relationships, and he's going to share how the best CEOs succeed at it. Spoiler alert, being a hands-off CEO or a loose cannon is not it.
Christoph Zen is a marketing professor at INSEAD, where he co-directs the Marketing and Sales Excellence Initiative with Columbia Business School's Noel Capon. He also wrote the new Harvard Business Review article, When CEOs Make Sales Calls. Christoph, thanks for joining me. Thank you for having me. Let's start with what people have historically understood, the prevailing wisdom for how involved or not involved CEOs should be on big sales deals.
Well, that's an interesting question and of course there is an easy answer to it. CEOs should by all means engage in customer relationships, maybe not each and every one. But by default, if they take care of their most important customer relationships and treat them like assets, they will be better off and as a consequence the whole company. But that's too simple.
especially when you look at the reality. And in fact, that is something which was also surprising when we started our research. We really thought that CEOs would just, again, by default, interact with customers naturally, but that was far from the truth. And in that research, you found five archetypes for CEOs, the different ways that CEOs or top executives interact
approach a sales problem. What did you find? Well, first of all, we found one role which was not on our radar.
At the very beginning, although we knew from the anecdotal evidence that it would come up in the research. And this role is called hands-off or not my problem, which meant the CEOs or the senior leaders were just simply staying away from customer relationships. You know, I can see where somebody would take that approach. Why did it surprise you? Well, the surprise was not the existence of the role, but the
the numbers behind because we would have expected that maybe 10% or so of the whole sample would follow this so-called hands-off or not my problem strategy but
It was really to our surprise that fully 28% of those in our study did follow that approach. So one third roughly choose deliberately not to engage in customer relationships. And I must say this motto, let the Salesforce do their job because they are hired exactly for that. That sounds eminently sensible.
But on the other hand, we believe, and that was a surprise, that you are losing out as a CEO or senior leader if you are not knowing what's going on at the frontline. That's like a general who will never engage with the troops on the frontline and also doesn't pay attention to what's going on on the battlefield.
So there's another archetype, which is almost the opposite of that, which you called the loose cannon. Right. And I would say the loose cannon is still a nice word for that role. In our workshops, the account managers we spoke to, they have given us a clear name for these executives who would meet customers without any briefing or debriefing. They call them seagulls.
which means the executive seagull flies in, makes a lot of noise and leaves the mess and then flies off again. I know this sounds
a little bit provoking, but it really characterizes the heart of the problem. These senior executives, they make unsound agreements. They create poor impression with customers just by making promises the company can later not fulfill. And that in turn creates a highly damaged relationship. They also do not seek briefing from account managers.
If at all, they may call you up as an account manager just the day before and say, okay, hi, I'm in town. I want to visit this customer. Can you arrange a meeting for me? And then the poor account manager is really super busy in either making this appointment or, as this is a strategy to deal with these loose cannons, maybe finding a way to postpone the meeting until the executive has left town again.
The next two archetypes are social visitor and dealmaker. Explain those and maybe a little bit how they're different. Yeah. First of all, we need to understand that both roles are showing one extreme in one of the dimensions of behavior we have researched. On the one hand, we took from literature here the concept of relationship building.
which executives can apply to a greater or lesser extent when they are involved in customer relationships. On the other hand, we also took as a second dimension the concept of or the dimension of revenue seeking.
And again, if you do this in a greater or lesser extent, that defines the extreme position. So in the one extreme, you could have an executive who would say, OK, I am seeing customers all the time. I care about the relationships here. I really engage in fostering the relationship long term to establish trust. But ultimately,
On the other hand, this executive doesn't care at all about business issues. So no, in hard terms, the executive would just do the whining, dining, the nice meet and greet activities, which is frustrating customers who would look for deeper engagement, of course. On the other hand, if you look for the other extreme,
You would have an executive who would be really, really interested in making sure that the deal is closed. They engage when a significant revenue opportunity arises or when the customer is just about to choose a supplier. And that signals, of course, a strong commitment to a particular deal. On the other hand, this is not a sustainable strategy because even rockstar CEOs or
or senior leaders cannot turn around every single deal. And I would say it's quite a simple truth that no senior executives want to create the image of a loser. So you cannot just delegate the dealmaker role to your CEO every single time. So you can apply this role probably only
every now and then, otherwise it's not sustainable. Can you tell me just briefly an example of something that goes wrong in a social visitor, right, this relationship-building CEO situation? There is an example, I think, which shows it very clearly when the senior leader, CEO, or anybody with significant decision power agrees to see the customer, right?
but doesn't really consider the business issues behind. And on the other side, you have a customer who would be experienced to understand
high caliber senior leader talks and would sit there with the whole entourage. But the CEO of the supplier company comes all alone. And then the question comes up very quickly. How are we now going to take this forward? Because you don't have your functional experts.
here with you, dear Mr. Supplier, CEO, and that would in turn mean it's a missed opportunity. So all they could do is the small talk. But if on the other side you have expectations on business talk, then this strategy of the social visitor falls short.
It can also lead, and I think that's a particular pitfall here, it can also lead to the frustration, as I already said, that the sales force understands that the social visitor is just here for the nice activities and the groundwork, the dirty work, is left to the sales force. So it really pays off if you focus on both dimensions, not just
the relationship building but also on the revenue seeking at the same time. Gotcha. And so the other extreme, the dealmaker with a very revenue seeking CEO, they also just haven't done the relationship building and spending the time understanding the customers to really make that work either. Correct. And dealmakers can do a lot of good. And I would say both the social visitor and the dealmaker role have their positives because
But for dealmakers specifically, this is not a sustainable sales strategy.
Of course, dealmakers engage when there are significant opportunities and the customers really love them for that. But if a dealmaker would only be there just to sign a particular agreement, that again falls short of expectations on both sides because clever customers would use this as an opportunity to throw in last minute concession requests.
And there are a couple of examples described in the article. But I would say to master the dealmaker role, it's really important that you master internal coordination. So I had two CEOs from the same industry. And one CEO was clearly saying, okay, I need to be involved in critical relationships, both from a relationship, but also from a revenue perspective.
And the other CEO said, I will not report anything I'm talking to with the customer to anybody and especially not to the sales force because this is confidential. So he was only acting as a dealmaker with at the start some initially good results, but finally it really backfired.
And the customer fired this supplier very quickly when he was approached by a more proactive CEO from another supplier who was following a combined strategy, not only talking about single deals, but also about the relationship, the long-term strategy.
And to give you the end of the story, that first CEO who said, I will not report what I'm doing, he also got fired. The company got sold. And I think that's the last thing you want to do when you are a senior leader that operates.
all your business is really going down the drain. So I really think dealmakers have some short-notice impact and in some occasions they may turn around the deal, but it's not a sustainable strategy. Which brings us to the fifth archetype, which clearly, just from the way you've named it, is the best one. It's called growth champion.
Can you talk about just what you saw in these growth champions? Well, first of all, it was again a little bit of a surprise that only 14% in our sample were acting as true growth champions. They all have significant interactions with important customers. They show robust investment.
and engagement and they build also strategic relationships through regular meetings and they even stay in their role no matter whether they got promoted. Of course, not everybody can become a CEO, but a CEO cannot manage 25 relationships as a growth champion. So you have to be selective also as a senior leader to which customers you apply that role of the growth champion. But I think
The bottom line is if you really follow that growth champion role, you're creating a positive environment.
the favorable conditions for success for both the customer to grow profitably and also for your sales team. And if you don't do that, you're missing out a huge opportunity. You may get away a little bit with the social visitor or the dealmaker behavior for some customers who would really
engage in more transactional relationships. But every company in the B2B world has strategic customers who are seeking long-term engagement and commitment from their suppliers. So even if it's only a handful of relationships, it really pays off here as our results then show when we looked at the performance impact of these roles. You found that the
Hands-off CEOs performed the worst. Loose cannons marginally better. We found that the social visitor and dealmaker both had positive attributes and positive effects on growth, but it was really this growth champion, somebody who brings it all together.
that was the one that really had the most outsized impact and longer term impact. Absolutely. And when we look at the numbers, we can really say the hands-off role doesn't have an impact at all. Even when you look at profitability, it's slightly negative. So hands-off is not an option.
When you then look at the four roles who interact with the customer, either via the revenue seeking or the relationship building dimension, the results start looking a little bit different when you take the low relationship building and low revenue seeking role called loose cannon into account.
there is a little bit of growth and a little bit of profitability, so marginally better. On the other hand, when you look at social visitors, the extreme relationship building role, or dealmakers, the extreme revenue seeking role, both generate about two times the growth and three times the profitability of the loose cannon row. If you take these two together, with two
28% for hands-off and 21% for loose cannon. It's half of our sample, neither interacting with the customer or interacting in a very negative way. So if you do the math, every second CEO here really doesn't live up to the full potential.
So this is really, really interesting research. It lets people, especially in those CEO functions, see things in a different way. But also if you're
you're on the receiving end of this whether you're you know a customer or somebody or an account manager working for one of these executives do you think it can be helpful to look at the ceo or the the folks who are running the the sales deal and just understanding what what their style is yes i think that's a a good way to to take it forward if you were a customer
then you could certainly check whenever you're going to meet your counterpart for the first time or again, which role they are applying in a dominant way. So if you realize that your counterpart, kind of the senior sponsor,
from your supplier would more follow a social visitor role, you could help your supplier also to develop stronger revenue seeking capabilities or simply ask for changing the social visitor or adding somebody who connect as a growth champion because that would be beneficial for both parties as our results show growth
and profitability would by default mean that the relationship is progressing, is making
showing good signs of growth and profitability. And that only happens if a customer would then be willing not just to spend more money on the supplier, but let the supplier help them grow and find new business opportunities for them as a customer. And in turn, the supplier would then grow. What do you do if you work for a CEO?
who gets overly involved in sales deals or is hands-off? What are some of the successful ways of managing up in that respect? How do you handle that situation? Yeah, that's a good question. We had a case where the senior leaders all came through the ranks of sales managers
and were kind of remembering the good old times when they were account managers. So in fact, they started to take over the Salesforce role and it was our noble job to remind them that their role is no longer to behave as an account manager,
when they are now assigned as senior sponsors, but really follow the growth champion strategy, which means that you leave, of course, some of the groundwork to your sales teams all over the functions or the geographies, but you are involved in both dimensions, revenue seeking and relationship building. How you deal with these people, I think,
It's relatively easy. You just give them proper briefings. You also make sure that your counterparts on the customer side would point towards a growth champion behavior. And I think then you can really play that very well. It's harder to deal with loose cannons because loose cannons usually...
pop out of the blue like the Seagull example. And there you may have to always weigh your options. It's not very helpful if you always tell your executive, oh, the meeting was postponed last minute. So you really have to sometimes also install processes like, for example,
a logistics company did just to make sure that the sales force is protected. And in this company, the sales force has the right for good reasons with good evidence to ask the board or the senior management to change an executive sponsor if it's appropriate.
But of course, that requires, I would say, a very open, trustful working culture. On the other hand, it's also a sign of a highly developed customer focus culture. And we all talk about customer centricity. But let's be honest, if such processes are still far away from reality, then I think it's a long way to go for many companies.
Yeah. And what do you do if your CEO is one of these, you know, has these positive attributes of being either a social visitor or a dealmaker, but doesn't do the, you know, the other side of that combination that you think makes a growth champion? Yeah, that's a very good question. I think there are two ways of dealing with it. One is that you...
accept that your CEO is a dealmaker, but you make sure that somebody else could kind of act as his sidekick and play more the relationship role. In an extreme, I had this myself when I was an account manager.
in earlier years. My then CEO was also not here too much interested in the relationship building. So we teamed up to kind of fulfill both roles.
He more on the deal-making and I more on the social side. But that requires a lot of coordination. And I think it can also be played the other way around. When you have a social visitor, you need a strong deal-maker. But the best way is certainly that you want to make sure that you simply educate your senior leaders. And I usually do a very simple thing.
with senior teams, I ask them very innocently, why don't you just give me observation of how you interact with your customers, if at all, on these two dimensions, relationship building and revenue seeking. And then we plot without giving them any further information
information, we plot the results and then step by step develop the categories of the five archetypes. And by seeing then the results, they start to realize, whoa,
We have done a lot of good things in the past, but you can then go further and say, OK, now let's do the math and just add the growth figures for sales and profitability to it and say, OK, what if we could turn maybe one third of your roles, maybe from the lower left, which is more
a little bit loose cannon type or social visitor dealmaker behavior more to the upper right. How much more business could you do then? And then the sky is the limit. Usually they get it. Christoph, this has been really helpful. Thanks so much for coming on the show to talk about what you learned. Thank you so much for having me.
That was Christoph Senn in conversation with Kurt Nickish on HBR IdeaCast. Senn is a marketing professor at INSEAD and co-author of the HBR article, When CEOs Make Sales Calls. We'll be back next Wednesday with another handpicked conversation about leadership from the Harvard Business Review.
If you found this episode helpful, share it with your friends and colleagues and follow our show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. While you're there, be sure to leave us a review. And when you're ready for more podcasts, articles, case studies, books, and videos with the world's top business and management experts, you'll find it all at hbr.org.
This episode was produced by Mary Du and me, Hannah Bates. Ian Fox is our editor and music by Coma Media. Special thanks to Maureen Hoke, Erica Truxler, Rob Eckhart, Ramsey Khabbaz, Nicole Smith, Anne Bartholomew, and you, our listener. See you next week.