We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode 📊 ChatGPT, Qwen, & DeepSeek: A Comparative Analysis
People
S
Speaker 1
Engaging in everyday conversations, expressing honest feelings and opinions.
Topics
Speaker 1: 我认为DeepSeek和Qwen的出现打破了美国科技巨头在人工智能领域的垄断,它们在特定领域的卓越表现令人瞩目。ChatGPT擅长创意写作和技术文档,能够将法律术语转化为通俗易懂的语言,但在高级数学和专业性较强的工作中存在局限性。DeepSeek专注于精度和效率,尤其擅长科学和数学任务,是运行复杂模拟和分析庞大数据集的理想选择。Qwen则以多语言处理能力见长,在商业和法律领域表现出色,尤其在亚洲市场,擅长普通话和阿拉伯语。在实际测试中,ChatGPT生成代码速度快但模拟效果不佳,DeepSeek在物理模拟中表现出色,Qwen在解决追逐难题时速度非常快,但在物理模拟方面表现不佳。所有人工智能在写情书时都遇到了困难,这表明人工智能可能无法完全复制人类的情感体验。

Deep Dive

Chapters
This chapter introduces three prominent AI models: ChatGPT, Qwen, and DeepSeek, highlighting their unique strengths and applications. ChatGPT excels in creative writing and documentation; DeepSeek specializes in precision and complex calculations for scientific and engineering tasks; while Qwen demonstrates strong problem-solving speed and multilingual capabilities, ideal for business and legal contexts.
  • ChatGPT's strengths lie in creative writing and documentation.
  • DeepSeek excels in precision and complex calculations for scientific and engineering applications.
  • Qwen shines in problem-solving speed and multilingual capabilities, suitable for business and legal tasks.

Shownotes Transcript

ChatGPT vs Qwen vs DeepSeek.

A comprehensive study compares the performance of ChatGPT, Qwen, and DeepSeek across various real-world AI applications, including language understanding, data analysis, and complex problem-solving.

This article benchmarks three AI models—ChatGPT, Qwen, and DeepSeek—across various tasks, including physics simulations, problem-solving, and creative writing. DeepSeek excels in precision and complex calculations, making it ideal for scientific and engineering applications. Qwendemonstrates strong problem-solving speed and multilingual capabilities, suitable for business and legal tasks. ChatGPT, while proficient in creative writing, struggles with complex problems, requiring multiple attempts for solutions. The comparison highlights the unique strengths and weaknesses of each model, guiding users towards the most appropriate AI tool based on their specific needs. Ultimately, the article advocates for choosing AI models based on task-specific requirements rather than solely focusing on general performance.

Which AI Model Outperforms in Coding, Mechanics, and Algorithmic Precision— Which Model Delivers Real-World Precision?

**Reference: **https://decodebuzzing.medium.com/qbenchmarking-chatgpt-qwen-and-deepseek-on-real-world-ai-tasks-75b4d7040742)

🙏 *Support My Podcast and Channel)*:

Consider buying me a coffee to say thank you for the free tech content on my YouTube channel (@enoumen) and the AI Unraveled podcast.

https://buy.stripe.com/3csaEQ1ST9nYgfe4gk)

**⚡ **AI Engineer On-Demand: Your Monthly Subscription to Quick, Powerful Solutions)

[caption id="attachment_4921" align="alignnone" width="525"] AI Engineer on Demand[/caption]

Listen)

AI Engineer On-Demand), offers businesses rapid access to skilled AI engineers for problem-solving, development, and consulting. This model allows companies to scale AI projects efficiently without the need for long-term hiring commitments.

Learn more) and connect. Schedule a zoom call here.)

Ready to commit, subscribe here)