The declaration of martial law by President Yoon Suk Yeol on December 3rd is being compared to the January 6, 2021, events in the U.S. Both events involved attempts to undermine democratic institutions, though the U.S. event aimed to overturn election results, while Yoon's action targeted an opposition-controlled parliament.
President Yoon Suk Yeol declared martial law to break the resistance of an opposition-controlled parliament, which he viewed as paralyzing the government. He attempted to use martial law as a tool to maintain or extend his power by undermining checks and balances.
The military's reluctance to use force to impose martial law was a key factor in the failure of Yoon's self-coup. This hesitation stemmed from the traumatic memory of the 1980 Gwangju massacre, where troops killed around 200 civilians during pro-democracy protests.
Political polarization weakens South Korea's democracy by making it difficult to reach compromises necessary for governance. It also leads to the acceptance of undemocratic behavior by one's own political party, further eroding democratic norms.
The 1980 Gwangju massacre, where military forces killed civilians during pro-democracy protests, serves as a critical lesson. The trauma from this event has made the military hesitant to use force against civilians, influencing their response during the recent political crisis.
South Korea's democratic institutions are strong in reacting to crises but weak in preventing them. The failure of institutional safeguards, such as checks and balances, allowed President Yoon to declare martial law, highlighting systemic vulnerabilities.
Civil society acts as the last line of defense for democracy in South Korea. Citizens have a history of mobilizing to protect their rights, drawing lessons from colonial occupation and military dictatorships. This mobilization is crucial when elected representatives fail to uphold democratic principles.
There is an ongoing debate about redistributing some of the president's powers to address the limitations of South Korea's political system. The current system, focused on fair presidential elections, has reached its limits and requires structural changes to prevent future crises.
Authorities in South Korea are continuing to try to arrest impeached South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol, following his failed declaration of martial law over a month ago. As the country continues to be mired in political crisis, analyst are studying the health of the country's democracy. And as our correspondent in Seoul tells us, they're drawing comparisons to recent events in the U.S.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices)NPR Privacy Policy)