SummaryIn this episode of the AI Engineering podcast, Philip Rathle, CTO of Neo4J, talks about the intersection of knowledge graphs and AI retrieval systems, specifically Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). He delves into GraphRAG, a novel approach that combines knowledge graphs with vector-based similarity search to enhance generative AI models. Philip explains how GraphRAG works by integrating a graph database for structured data storage, providing more accurate and explainable AI responses, and addressing limitations of traditional retrieval systems. The conversation covers technical aspects such as data modeling, entity extraction, and ontology use cases, as well as the infrastructure and workflow required to support GraphRAG, setting the stage for innovative applications across various industries.Announcements
Interview
Introduction
How did you get involved in machine learning?
Can you describe what GraphRAG is?
What are the capabilities that graph structures offer beyond vector/similarity-based retrieval methods of prompting?
What are some examples of the ways that semantic limitations of nearest-neighbor vector retrieval fail to provide relevant results?
What are the technical requirements to implement graph-augmented retrieval?
What are the concrete ways in which the embedding and retrieval steps of a typical RAG pipeline need to be modified to account for the addition of the graph?
Many tutorials for building vector-based knowledge repositories skip over considerations around data modeling. For building a graph-based knowledge repository there obviously needs to be a bit more work put in. What are the key design choices that need to be made for implementing the graph for an AI application?
How does the selection of the ontology/taxonomy impact the performance and capabilities of the resulting application?
Building a fully functional knowledge graph can be a significant undertaking on its own. How can LLMs and AI models help with the construction and maintenance of that knowledge repository?
What are some of the validation methods that should be brought to bear to ensure that the resulting graph properly represents the knowledge domain that you are trying to model?
Vector embedding and retrieval are a core building block for a majority of AI application frameworks. How much support do you see for GraphRAG in the ecosystem?
For the case where someone is using a framework that does not explicitly implement GraphRAG techniques, what are some of the implementation strategies that you have seen be most effective for adding that functionality?
What are some of the ways that the combination of vector search and knowledge graphs are useful independent of their combination with language models?
What are the most interesting, innovative, or unexpected ways that you have seen GraphRAG used?
What are the most interesting, unexpected, or challenging lessons that you have learned while working on GraphRAG applications?
When is GraphRAG the wrong choice?
What are the opportunities for improvement in the design and implementation of graph-based retrieval systems?
Contact Info
Parting Question
Closing Announcements
Links
Things Not Strings)) Google Knowledge Graph Paper
Cypher query language
GQL) query standard
The intro and outro music is from Hitman's Lovesong feat. Paola Graziano) by The Freak Fandango Orchestra)/CC BY-SA 3.0)