Rep. Clay Higgins
38:36 Share

IT has been exactly three years since january sixty events of january sixty racist insurrection that shocked this nation to its core or profoundly than anything ince Pearl harbor post the civil war um and IT has taken a while honestly, even for people who aren't on the side of the professions wires to realize there something a miss about what happened that day, not just the response, the largest law enforcement mobilization in the history, united states, that was obviously proportionate because IT wasn't the worst ride that year, not even closed.

But the day itself, there was something about january sick, I didn't feel right. And hovering over that day has remained the question to what extent was IT a set up and we still don't really know. But what's interesting is how few people have asked that legitimate question in one of the very few, really only.

The only in the united congress is a member called clay higgins. From lisa in the k, you can see the slip is worth retouching. This is from twenty twenty two in a holland security community hearing where he asked IT just directly of the FBI director.

IT, did the F, P, I have confidential human sources embedded? The january six protesters on jane were six to twenty twenty one.

Well, congress, as i'm sure you can appreciate, I had to be very careful about what .

I can say about math finish about when we do and do not where we have and have not used confidential human sources.

But to the extent that there is a suggestion, for example, that the FBI is confidential human sources or FBI employees, in some way instigated or orchestrated genre six.

that's categories false to a human sources. Dress prom supporters inside the capital and january, the six, prior to the doors being open again.

I had to be very careful.

should be no. Can you not tell the american people know we did not have confidential human sources? Stress, as trump supporters position inside the capital, you read anything into my decision .

not to share in from .

the right for this time has expert.

What a sleezy, repulsive little authoritarian liar Christa is, is obvious when you watch that tape. Sad part is so few types like that exists, because so few, you have confronted him directly and ask questions to which the entire country has a right to the answer like that clerics did that consume from luz of yet going this in two year, consuming. Thanks much coming up.

I have a made up.

So that was over year ago that you asked that question, which is essential question, and you asked IT, as I think is appropriate without any embarrassment, all in behalf of your constituent arrest of the country. Are you waiting closer to the answer now?

Well, we're closer to being in a position where we can reveal the answers that we already have much of the evidence that we have compiled and from investigated by for over the the course at the last couple of years. Some offices like my own would of Operating in silos of investigative endeavor.

Um we've now been able to just come together now that we have republic a majority, we have access to the to the to the steps of the appropriate investigative committees and so I sit on the overside committee we republicans run at committee now therefore we control the step so when you can magnify the efforts that individual um members of congress have have have pushed out within our own offices, when you can magnify those efforts part of the scale and the numbers of staff from the committees, you you get a lot of evenness reviewed professionally and aligned and assembled into a essentially a case file and in in this case this is a big file but we got the the involvement of of certain actors and you can say deep state actors within the federal government to set the stage for ah what happened when j four five and six and and two um in trap thousands of americans from across the country in a lower them into this this set stage on j four five and six the people that were involved than that is is is is quite a large web so yes, sir. We do have a great deal of evidence compiled and we are we are gradually, professionally, a role in that evidence out. So you short .

answer the question right there in larger terms. You just said that elements within the federal government, I assume, law enforcement, intel and military. Look, any amusing awards lured americans to washington into what you call the trap?

Yes, sir, so that would I mean.

that's a shocking and I assume that that's a solar conclusion based on the evidence.

As for your side, that that would be sober assessment as an investigator. And I am quite A I love my country and and I i've always been a stage defender of the ten blue line. And I I would proud, look out the FBI mokes.

That number is like brothers to me. So to find that level of of conspiratorial corruption at the highest levels of the F. B.

I. And has been very troubling to me as a man, as a cup. And and yet, did you know you follow the events, whether IT leads? And yes, this is what investigators do.

So when I asked the Christmas that question for us and said already knew the answer, I IT compelled evidence that the F. B, I had assets, human assets, dresses drop, supporters inside the capital prior to the doors being open and masses allowed in. So I, I knew that the F, P, I was deeply involved.

I had seen evidence, even at that time, with the, that the F, B, I had embedded themselves into various groups online across the country of americans who were essentially voicing their their concerns and airing their grievances with each other about covered oppression. And those americans were targeted by the F, P. I, almost univerSally republicans and and largely trump supporters.

But the P. I worked on to cover and infiltrates conversations and become a significant part of those individual americans communications. And when you dig into the evidence that we've we've had revealed through some criminal cases that have follow and work within families of jay ics, political detainees and americans that have been persecuted for their involvement in the capital that day, in some of that evidence was shockingly revealed that the, the, the F, B.

I agents that were Operate in on cover within the online groups across the country were the first ones to plant the seeds of of suggestions of of a of a more radical occupation of the capital and and they were sort of testing the waters of who amongst that group would would begin acknowledged that, you know, yeah may maybe we should do that. Maybe we should plan for an occupation like that. But if you look at the the origins of those conversations, IT was started by that the P I.

On the cover guard that was Operated inside the group. And then months later, uh, on january four hundred and six, many of those americans met for the first time in person when they gathered for the massive rally where american patrons assembled to object to everything that had happened or two and twenty, the cover oppression and the the stunning results of what we have was a compromise election cycle in november twenty twenty. And americans gathered at their own capital to to appropriately air and grievances and protest at their capital.

But embedded among their number was an F B I asset that had been working from within a group online for many months. So this was the level of of manipulative effort that the F P. I invested into american citizen.

Rain are are assembly online are into exercise our rights on to the first amendment to talk to each other about whatever we want to talk about, including the the the in cia's suppression cover IT that we were suffering across the country. So and our concerns about where the election was going in the all male in ballot, then we can see the stage was being set for compromise election cycle possible. To our horror. That's what happened. So I P, I had very prince honest thing from for many months prior to jay four, five insects.

I wanted go back to something you said in the first sentence, which is you have seen evidence in that sport, your questions to Chris, that there were F, B, I assets dressed as from sports within the capital. So that is proof entrapment because of course, the federal government could have prevented entry into the capital building. Are that many doors you work there, you know, but they allowed people in on purpose to interpret them. That's what that proves, I think doesn't not well.

it's certainly condemning its another piece of the of the strategy that the that the government employed to sort of complete. The entrapment of americans said they had had a infiltrated and in proud and provoked with online with with those original siege planted of of actions like you know what type of gear aware and and just in language that incited behavior that could go the wrong way, pushing actions of of legal and legitimate peaceful protest to in edge where where those americans would likely not have gone had they not been been been encouraged by the FBI plant amongst number that didn't know is there. So by the time I was actually j six, and you had, you had a masses of america's assemble outside the capital, like ninety nine point nine percent, one hundred percent peaceful on the inside. You had F, B, I assets, dresses, trump supporters that you wear around the capital .

before the doors.

even before the doors of are trying going to get around a capital. You been there many times. You need a gud to get from whatever door you go in.

elaborate. It's it's amazed inside there. So it's right. So there's no way just americans, most of which had never went to the capital, is no way they can come in some random door that gets opened and they get their way directly to the to the statuary of the house chAmber or the senate chAmber is just not possible.

So the, the, the F, P, I assets that were dresses trump supporters that were inside the capital were there are believe and evidence indicated they were there to to specifically wave in the the trump supporters that had gathered outside the cap at all, in the doors open an hour allowed in and on the inside were were, oh, some more trump supporters. But really, those were F B I assets, law enforcement assets, that knew that wear around a capable and they wave those guys in the move, follow us and they're the ones that LED them in the past directly. I think a guys never meant to the capital. Got a, got a comment to the capital or empt up on on emotion and make his way straight and as I pollock office come on it's like I couldn't yet IT. It's no way i've been over seven years you'd come in summer random door to capital and make .

my way and everything is unmarked in those leadership officers are unmarked.

So how, which is confusing to get around in the capital, every american that has been their notes, when you go on a tour, you buy your family and dc, you go through the capital, you have to have a guide. And and on january six, the guides were FBI assets and enforcement assets, and they would dress this trump supporters. They were position inside the capital prior to the doors being open so that the americans that had assembled outside the capital, once allowed in, could be brought directly to the areas were the epic A D O J in the deep state actors knew would be the most, the most short of condemned criminal action of of americans being a being inside the capital protesting without permit. In things said, they knew they were set in a stage for arrest and prosecution.

It's such a crime. Who who planned this.

do you think? I take factions plan that I would say who doctor cazi, but I think there was one person shot that the plan is but believe the faction of establishment liberals within the F P I A democrats party and our telega services to to another extent um use their massive powers of surveilling and um in and investigative. Asset that they have across the country, confidential informers, register informers, non register informers, voluntary.

And um it's it's A A complex web of A F B I S sets across the country that can be activated. So if you have authority at some of the highest levels in the FBI, don't take much. The faction with the F B I in within our logic services that would coordinate with with the most extreme liberal factions would then a democrat party that would desperate to keep trump out of office in the end.

In a work within the the title of Operation showers say that had been that had been set by by the covet alleged medical emergencies nationwide in millions and millions of mail in ballots. There's no daylight between the the compromised election cycle of november twenty twenty and ultimately what happened on on, on jay six. So yes, cool planned this. This would be the combination of several several of the most extreme liberal and I trump ani amErica first factions that that went positions of authority within our our federal law, forceful organizations and the the democrat party across the country.

Can when you say that there were F, B, I assets in the crowd, IT in the building beforehand and and certainly outside, what's the scale of this you talk you like can twenty now?

um. Based upon some very conservative but like hard investigative effort evaluation of of the numbers from putting together eye witnesses and and videos and and afa David statement and whistle blower statements and the court records that have been revealed through individual criminal cases were jicks defences have been prosecuted and smart attorneys have forced admissions by the D O G. epi. But those emissions have been sealed within a premature of that criminal case by protective order by the judge so that I I can share them, but i've seen them so real hard, objective and conservative estimates would would put the number of F, P, I, S S in the crowd outside and working inside at at well over two hundred.

two hundred yeah so you're in an enforcement yeah yeah before you came to congress in the military as well um that seem that an extraordinary .

number is is IT well, no. When you think about the scope .

of the Operation of, I don't know when the apple was burned out or when saying john, the pyy bal church of cards in the White house and the square was set a believe and all the local services tions were injured where there are two hundred FBI assets in the crowd among N. T.

For them I don't know how many on the cover ages. Happy I would happen in situation like that. But, but, but, but jail sex was the, was the, was the final act prior to arrest and prosecution of of americans said that too would identity at us as trump supporters.

Many objective was to destroy the entire mega movement to to forever stain the the patriotic server that was associated with with the amErica first mega movement that had one in two thousand six eight and we believe one again in twenty twenty and the the establishment are on both sides of both major parties were determined to to smash out out of existence not just by defeating trump but by destroying the um the reputations of the movement itself by creating this narrative that IT was totally false but but was heavily pushed that the that make a republicans amErica parse republicans or somehow a danger to our republic and A A domestic terror threat all another story about what F P I is done the tag in americans as uh suspected domestic terrorist and following us as we travel across the country. But the the bottom line is that uh two hundred as I believe a conservative number first I think many more but I know of that i'm comfortable gone on record with is that we believe that they were there were easily two hundred. But beyond the current assets Operating in the crowd.

Outside the capital, embedded into groups that enter the capital or provoked entry of the capital and working with FBI asset that would have included metro police and capital police that address as trump supporters inside the capital because those with the guys at new their way around the captain. So given the scope of the Operation in the number of of doors where entry was allowed, he even encouraged um then the in the number of people that would actually outside the capital and IT entered when we believe two hundred is a conservative number. yes.

Or it's is shocking what you're saying that confirms everyone's were suspicions about this. It's curly true um did you come across any evidence that the the D O, D, the military, either defense intelligence agency or natural garden, any part of U. S. Military played any role in this at all.

I have not seen that I heard the echoes of that suspicion and I have I have observed circumstantial evidence that that has been presented to me that that I have reviewed but to but to me um IT does not rise to the level that I would call um actionable from an investigative perspectival so there is some there was some some suspicion but in in in law force ment, the threshold you looking across is reasonable suspicion that would prompted a criminal investigation and then the next threshold is probable cause which you need for arrest.

And of course, at our system, finally, the last through the holders is a is convention guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, so that I did review evidence stocker regarding the suspicions of military involvement in some way. But and I and I have reviewed some of that evidence that that has been that i've been able to get my eyes on, and I do not think that the the military was was involved not at the level, most certainly not at the level of the the F, B, I and a over the course of all of twenty, twenty and then j, four, five and six. The F, P, I, working in coordination with other long enforcement assets that that they do, is roped in to the Operation from metro P, D, from D, C, N. And the capital police was sort of, was sort of tricked into participating with with what the FBI advantage in for, you know, ten months is just .

admit if you take resource back, this is not democracy. So the federal agencies serve under the oversight of the elected president. And then under the other side of the elective congress, they are elected.

People get to make the decisions. A republican president, you know have a republican congress and neither one can get a straw answers from the FBI. No one has any control the FBI you're describing a government within a government.

well. In america. A question becomes reasonable. Men would would ask, when we face a crisis like this, who investigates the investigate, right? And the assert in amErica is congress.

So we we have the responsibility to investigate through the appropriate committees, which would certainly certain doing that now that we have a republic majority and control of the committees. But we don't end the power to arrest. We can we can give criminal referrals based upon our investigative efforts, but we have to have A D, O, J.

It's receptive to the criminal referrals. So we've hit quite A A brick wall, have we not? In constitutionally, we we have the responsibility to investigate objectively. And and and anyone that knows me IT know that's exactly what i'm i'm pursuing. I do not have i'm not trying to create a crime to fit a narrative to blame on the ubi.

I'm following the evidence and and to my horror IT implicates A, F, B, I to highest level and the and a conspiracy with in our government at the highest level to create the the um to set the stage for a compromise election cycle in twenty and then the the the actions that took place on j four, five and and six and then the the criminal investigation, arrest and prosecution all americans said they were able to entrap and document with the thousands of cameras are Operating that day and use that evidence that they knew they were setting up to investigate, arrest and prosecute americans a day and drapped so congress can investigate these things and and we are and we will reveal these horrific truth and we will have criminal force. But until you have A A A president run in the executive bridge that will clean house at D, O J N F B I eyes levels and put american patridge in place, that will be, that will act upon the criminal referrals that that congress provides. Then not those guys gone to get arrested because that I can not arrest themselves. And we all have arrest authority.

I'm a little and don't expect to be critical of your colleagues in the republican conference, but I mean, they do control the house in peaching as a thing CHR race till the FBI director I watched republican, some of my note cheer the murder of bache. Babbett was unarmed. Woman, less than five five h.

By Michael bird. They were Michael bird side and IT, I have to say, for a lot of republics ters, I count myself among them very clarifying. If you're cheering ashly babbies murder, shooting women.

Now that's okay because he likes strong and there are republicans like you are. I was happy. I got a lot of them thought that what how yeah.

I was and I had made me sick me too. And i'm IT is a great responsibility when you we were by edge and america, we think about IT to be to be the to be the designated servant of your community that has that has see the authority to a to deny the freedom of a fellow american in the land of the free. I does a happy responsibility.

So the the escalation of a force is IT must be appropriate in order to affect a lawful arrest and and A A bad, a bad shot is the worst thing that an officer can possibly be involved in in his, in his career. As 现在 为 it's， it's, it's the thing of nightmares ers for for good police office. So to take what was what from the law force, from a prospect, IT was clearly a bad suit, because there are some basic groups you just can advise.

C, you have to attempt to affect an arrest before you can go to deadly force. There was there was no attempt to arrest ashly babbit. The officers on the other side of the window he was climbing through. There were officers on the interior side of the window he was climbing through.

There was no indication that had been that this been gone on for an hour and there was there was no reports on the radio or anywhere else of of gun fights that there was no reason at that point to expect that actually baber anybody else in in the crowd gona produce a firearm and stock fire on police offices. why? Because he had not happen. So IT, that's part of the totality of circumstances.

A police officer is responsible for knowing which they are because in communication, what already, as we know is going on, uh, that officer that pulled that trigger which shot A A american woman who is clearly in a and like a physically compromised position, climbing through the broken glass of a of a window is not, you know, not like he just stepped in to cage and M. M. A.

And he was ready to fight to climate through a window draped in a flag. This police officer is on the other side of the window as police officers on the interior side of the window. So yeah, plenty enough officer presence. If you want to arrest that woman and buy all mains, pull a through the window, put fledged cops on or throw in the corner, we'll get to you later.

Man, work on a busy right now, but that's what you do you to grab that woman and pulled through a flash of ter and throw corner, they handed back to somebody that could pull her back you from that front line right there. So understand is that very well understand officers have to make split second decisions but you never you never make a decision to use little force unless it's absolutely called for in required if you lose in a fight attempt in to effect and arrest and then yeah here of the if if there's if if the officer's life is in danger is all by himself. But this never should be a circumstance where you just pull the trigger.

A woman climate through a window is clearly on armed as no evidence of gun play from the crowd as she's coming from, got officers on both sides of where he is. If you got a rester than biome is a rester no to put flex cups on and move on a 处 的。 You done the next person trying to come through the window, but you don't shoot her. So the .

matters in the a investitures, yes. Why do you think that was?

And is this insanity that is taken hold in the, in the the minds and arts of many otherwise reasonable american citizens? Were they? Did they? They hate trump so much like they. They're so deeply embedded.

They they've sold their souls to the establishment that when we had an amErica of first president in and he and he d like stopped the ah the military dush o complex for momentum and N E N E began restoring power to individual members of congress and restoring individual rise and freedoms and sovereign of the state, and he took away the actions of the car tails and and brought this a this common sense approach to the executive brain was laid our country in that beautiful direction this was interfering with the business model of the establishment. So many career politicians on both sides of the are and you know, I would like those guys. I'm not wonderful, I said my country in congress, but I I don't consider myself a politician by an image.

I'm observant to with the people, somebody y's guys and they popped out of the warm to be to be politicians, if you grow their own life, you know, to be A A career politician. And those are the ones that had this instinctive cheer for something really bad, happened into a trump support, you know, the true cause showed in that moment and was an ugly color. Yeah, we .

shouldn't be shooting women. Number one, I couldn't be more. So where where does this go from? Here you have this corporation of information that sounds like it's definitive. When does the public seen the detail? And was the process after .

that to good question. so. Evidence from criminal investigations, by nature, of rather secretive. But there is A, A, A tremendous compilation of data that I think you should be made completely available to the public. And ask the digital files from from j four, five and six.

This is where a speaker, my john can be a chapon for for that will be remembered for throughout history as the speaker. The house that fully released unread acted a digital files from j four, five and six completely to the american people. And they within that data that is full truth.

And and the american people, this is only staff large enough to frame by frame, go through eighty thousand hours of digital evidence. Nobody has just have become up to do that. But we can crowd source IT to the american people. So you ask, when will this evidence be released? And i've been encouraging speaker Johnson, as I did speaker mccarthy to my guy, and released this data to the american people.

I won't think .

I believe speaker john will, but but mike is is is quite a skilled constitutional st. Attorney himself. And he's a very measured, patient, painful man so I I have extend trust to to speaker Johnson when he says that his intention to finally release the the god j six tapes would really digital evidence more than it's more than just video evidence.

It's a lightness, your radio dash groups. The whole thing I believe much is speaker Johnson. Knows that this is a significant um duty that he must he he he must perform for the american people.

It's a moment in history where where you know I believe our lord's abia has placed him in that in that position of service to the country. And he has a responsibility to to fully release that data. And then the american people will see but themselves what some of us have already learned, to our horror, to be true.

Constant and thank you very much.