We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Facebook ABANDONS Phony Fact Checking!

Facebook ABANDONS Phony Fact Checking!

2025/1/10
logo of podcast The Jimmy Dore Show

The Jimmy Dore Show

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
1
1月6日抗议者
K
Kara Swisher
卡拉·斯威舍是一位知名的媒体评论家和播客主持人,专注于科技和政治话题的深入分析。
M
Matt Taibbi
马克·扎克伯格
Topics
马克·扎克伯格:我认为应该优先考虑言论自由,减少审查制度。我们将取消事实查核员,并用类似X平台的社区评论系统取而代之。事实查核员存在政治偏见,破坏了信任。我们将简化内容政策,取消对移民和性别等话题的限制。我们将大幅减少审查制度,优先处理非法和严重违规行为。我们将恢复推荐政治内容。我们将把信任与安全以及内容审核团队迁出加州,并与特朗普总统合作对抗全球审查制度。我们需要美国政府的支持来对抗全球审查制度的趋势。内容审核工作应该从删除内容转向减少错误、简化系统和赋予人们发言权。 Russell Dobular 和 Keaton Weiss:Facebook因为审查制度导致大量用户流失,正在试图止血。Facebook的事实查核一直具有政治倾向。Facebook的事实查核远超出了事实查核的范畴,例如在COVID期间禁止讨论实验室泄漏。我不理解为什么自由派需要事实查核员。扎克伯格的举动是受了媒体压力和国会调查的影响。扎克伯格的举动是朝着更合理的言论自由方向发展,但其长期效果仍有待观察。在X平台上,言论审查比在Dorsey领导下的推特要好。YouTube的AI审查机制过于严格。Facebook的审查制度是由于民主党施压造成的。扎克伯格取消审查制度实际上是减轻了压力,做他想做的事。Facebook的审查制度可能会稍微放松,但不太可能回到十年前的状态。CNN对扎克伯格声明的解读是错误的。Meta与第三方事实查核员的合作存在政治偏见。Meta的高层正在发生向右翼的意识形态转变。“真实Facebook监督委员会”认为Meta的政策变化是政治逢迎。保守派长期以来一直声称事实查核系统限制了他们的声音。扎克伯格效仿了马斯克的做法,取消了事实查核团队。我不理解为什么人们会依赖社交媒体来寻找真相。即使事实查核员没有偏见,也不需要他们。如果对公众不信任,就不应该拥有这个平台。那些喜欢审查制度的人可以去其他平台。那些支持审查制度的人实际上不喜欢言论自由。直接质问那些支持审查制度的人,他们是否喜欢审查制度。那些支持审查制度的人实际上是缺乏独立思考能力的。那些支持审查制度的人希望被呵护和被告知该做什么和该怎么想。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why is Meta getting rid of fact-checkers on its platforms?

Mark Zuckerberg announced that Meta will remove fact-checkers and replace them with a community notes system, similar to X (formerly Twitter). He stated that fact-checkers have been too politically biased, destroying more trust than they created, especially in the U.S. This move is part of a broader shift to prioritize free speech and reduce censorship.

What is Meta's new approach to content moderation?

Meta plans to simplify its content moderation policies by focusing filters on illegal and high-severity violations. For lower-severity issues, action will only be taken if someone reports the content. This change aims to reduce mistakes and dramatically decrease the amount of censorship on its platforms.

How does Meta plan to handle political content moving forward?

Meta will reintroduce civic content by phasing political posts back into Facebook, Instagram, and Threads. This decision comes after feedback that users want to see political content again, marking a shift from earlier efforts to reduce such content due to user stress.

What role does Mark Zuckerberg see for the U.S. government in promoting free speech globally?

Zuckerberg emphasized the need for U.S. government support to push back against global censorship trends. He highlighted that Europe, Latin America, and China have increasingly restrictive laws, and the U.S. must use its strong constitutional protections for free expression to counter these efforts.

What criticism has Meta faced regarding its fact-checking program?

Critics argue that Meta's fact-checking program was politically biased, particularly favoring the left. Conservatives have long claimed that the system restricted their voices. The Real Facebook Oversight Board called the changes a retreat from a sane and safe approach to content moderation.

What is the significance of Meta's move to Texas for content moderation?

Meta is relocating its trust and safety and content moderation teams from California to Texas. Zuckerberg believes this move will help reduce concerns about team bias and build trust as the company promotes free expression on its platforms.

How does Meta's new community notes system work?

Meta's community notes system, inspired by X, allows users to add context to posts. If enough users flag a post as misleading or false, a note will appear underneath the content. This system aims to provide more speech rather than relying on a select few to determine truth.

What is the broader ideological shift within Meta's leadership?

Meta's leadership is shifting ideologically to the right, as evidenced by the appointment of Trump ally Dana White to its board and a $1 million donation to Trump's inaugural fund. This shift aligns with Zuckerberg's efforts to improve relations with Trump and the Republican Party.

What are the implications of Meta's partnership with third-party fact-checkers ending?

The end of Meta's partnership with third-party fact-checkers has significant implications for content moderation. Critics argue that it will lead to more dangerous misinformation on the platforms, while supporters see it as a step towards reducing political bias and promoting free speech.

How does Meta plan to address harmful content while reducing censorship?

Meta acknowledges that reducing censorship will result in more harmful content appearing on its platforms. However, Zuckerberg emphasized that the trade-off is necessary to reduce the number of innocent posts and accounts mistakenly taken down. The company will focus on tackling illegal and high-severity violations more effectively.

Chapters
Mark Zuckerberg announced significant changes to Facebook's content moderation policies, including the elimination of fact-checkers and a shift towards community-based moderation. This decision is framed as a return to prioritizing free speech and reducing censorship errors, but critics fear a surge in misinformation.
  • Elimination of Facebook and Instagram fact-checkers
  • Shift to community-based moderation (similar to X)
  • Reduced content restrictions on topics like immigration and gender
  • Increased focus on illegal and high-severity violations
  • Return of civic content recommendations

Shownotes Transcript

Meta will get rid of fact-checkers, “dramatically reduce the amount of censorship” and recommend more political content on its platforms, including Facebook, Instagram and Threads, founder Mark Zuckerberg has announced.

In a video message, Zuckerberg vowed to prioritize free speech after the return of Donald Trump to the White House and said that, starting in the US, he would “get rid of fact-checkers and replace them with community notes similar to X”.

Zuckerberg said Meta’s “fact-checkers have just been too politically biased and have destroyed more trust than they’ve created”.

Guest hosts Russell Dobular and Keaton Weiss of the Due Dissidence podcast discuss the move from Zuckerberg, and the sordid history of fact checking at Facebook.

Plus segments on callous Israelis’ total lack of concern for the deaths of children in Gaza and Democrat dead-enders rallying in DC on January 6th to register their objection to the Trump presidency.