Trump BETRAYS MAGA & “America First” Over Gaza!
58:14 Share

Come see us on tour in Dallas, Austin, Baltimore, Hartford, Connecticut, Syracuse, New York, Atlantic City, Levittown, Cohoes, and Providence, Rhode Island. Go to JimmyDore.com for the link for the cheapest tickets. Yeah.

Medium speeds and jumps to medium and hits them head on. It's the Jimmy Tore Show. So Trump, Trump's Gaza proposal for Riviera of the Middle East sparks global condemnation. Hey, everybody, if you love six flags, you're really going to love two flags amusement park. Just Israel and America. Yeah, the Riviera proposal.

The Riviera of the Middle East. Wow. The U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip. We'll own it. That's what Trump has said. Who the hell do you think is actually going to pay for it? They don't have any independent money. It's all our money. Israel is just a limb of the United States. Come on.

From the river to the casino. Okay, here we go. Ready? The only reason the Palestinians want to go back to Gaza is they have no alternative. It's right now a demolition site. This is just a demolition site. Virtually every building is down. So I just want to make one point here before I get to my main point. The one point is that...

What the rest of the world was saying, that this is just carpet bombing and flattening the whole Gaza Strip, they were saying, no, it's targeted. It's targeted. No, we're targeting. We're the most moral army in the world. We take every precaution possible. And now they're saying, yeah, you know what? Turns out we flattened the whole place.

The whole place. We bombed every hospital, every school, every university. We bombed the water. We bombed the infrastructure. It's all gone. It's unlivable. So I just want to let you know that as Joe Biden and Israel was saying for, I don't know, 14 months, that no, we're just we're targeting. It's targeted. That was always a lie. That was always a lie. I just want to make that point.

They're living under fallen concrete that's very dangerous and very precarious. They instead can occupy all of a beautiful area with homes and safety, and they can live out their lives in peace and harmony instead of having to go back and do it again.

The U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip and we will do a job with it too. We'll own it and be responsible for dismantling all of the dangerous unexploded bombs and other weapons. Yeah, America's going to own it.

Because, you know, Israel would never attack Americans. Liberty. Okay. On the site, level the site and get rid of the destroyed buildings, level it out, create an economic development that will supply unlimited numbers of jobs and housing for the people of the area. Do a real job. Do something different. Just can't. So.

I just want people to, I want MAGA to realize what Trump has just said. Trump is just, because the Palestinians ain't leaving. If they've stuck around for 14 months of complete carpet bombing and shelling and 70 years of occupation and a knock-off, they ain't leaving. So what he's saying is the U.S. is going to own it. He's going to send troops there. He's just committed the United States to a war.

Unless he's bluffing. And so what this is going to require is the United States sending their military there to forcefully move the Palestinians out of Gaza. That's the definition of ethnic cleansing. It's not only ethically and morally wrong, it's also pragmatically ridiculous. And they're never going to put up with it. And so do you think the Houthis are going to put up with it? Do you think Hezbollah? Do you think Hamas?

There's just as many Hamas today as when the war started. So I just want MAGA. So MAGA has done a good job before with the H-1B visas. They stood up and they made their voices heard. This is a complete, this is the opposite of America. He's not, guess what? Two weeks into his thing, he's announcing he's going to build a whole new country on the Gaza Strip. He's not building manufacturing plants.

factories in Ohio or Wisconsin or Michigan. He's not building high-speed rail in the United States. He's not building infrastructure. He's going to go build in another freaking country. We're going to call it East Palestine. They still don't have clean water in Flint. East Palestine is still a mess. But he's got big plans. Altadena, Pacific Palisades. But he's got big plans for greater Israel. That's his first priority.

So this is the opposite of America first. This is the opposite of his non-intervention policy. This is the opposite of all that. This is intervention. This is a committing to another war because this is going to be a war to get those people out of there. And it will never, it's not, this is, and by the way, and also, this was the plan all along. So the reason why Bibi Netanyahu and Israel funded Hamas was

And they knew that the October 7th attack was happening and they didn't respond for hours and hours. And they also slaughtered a lot of their own people was so they could use that as a pretense to go and flatten Gaza so they could eventually take it over because that's what they've always wanted. It's called the Greater Israel Project.

So that was the plan all along. And you want to go look at my other video where we did with Ben Swan using Israeli news sources. It's crystal clear that Israel knew about October 7th and they let October 7th happen if they didn't fund it themselves. Okay, but Jimmy, is it evil to kill women and children on purpose? Is it? Is it? Is it? So...

So this is a complete betrayal of what Donald Trump promised when he was running for president. This is not America first. This is Israel first. This is all about Israel. This is about Miriam Adelson. This is about his Israeli, his Jewish donors. This is not about America first. If it was America first, he would be talking about factories in America. He'd be talking about East Palestine in America.

He'd be talking about cleaning up the water in Flint and rebuilding Altadena, working class neighborhood that just got wiped out. He'd be talking about rebuilding the Pacific Palisades. There's a million other things he could be talking about. But two weeks in, his big project right now is to nation build. The thing he promised he shouldn't be doing. So there you go. And everybody with the... So then they went on.

Who do you envision living there? Isn't it funny? He's going to rebuild Gaza, but not for the Palestinians. What? Not for the Palestinians. Who do you envision living there? I envision world people. Well, let's listen to him say it.

I envision the world people living there. The world people? Really? Will there be international pancakes there, too? Because that's about as realistic a question as the proposal working out. Because this proposal, I'm telling you, this is not going to work out. I'm not a good predictor of things, although I did predict this.

I said Trump will come in, force a deal, stop the slaughter, and then he's going to do two things you don't like. He's going to give the West Bank away, and he's going to try to get the Palestinians out of Palestine. And that's exactly what he's doing. So I am kind of on a two-for-two streak, or three-for-three. World people, why not Palestinians? That's their homeland. There's another problem here too, right? So all the evangelicals who are more Zionist than Zionists, they think that Israel is

Has to take over Gaza and the West Bank. So then for their biblical stuff to work out. That's what that's all about. That's why evangelical Americans are more Zionist than Zionists. Because they think it's the Bible. It's got to happen. So then the rapture or something. I'm not up on it. I don't read the Bible. I'm Catholic. Rapture's not in the Bible. It's not? Okay. No. So...

So world people are going to live there. So he's just he's just announcing that we're going to do a thing called a war crime. We're going to go in and ethnically cleanse a place and we're going to use military to do it, which means a war. That's all done. They already got the cleansing done. Now they're going to do. I think in his head, it's like a casino deal. You know, like natives get casinos. I think it's something like that.

I think that's how he looks at it. That is how he looks at it. All right, let's... You're going to have a casino. So let's hear the rest of this. I think you'll make that into an international, unbelievable place. I think the potential in the Gaza Strip is unbelievable.

And I think the entire world, representatives from all over the world will be there and they'll live there. Palestinians also. Palestinians will live there. Many people will live there. But they've tried the other and they've tried it for decades and decades and decades. It's not going to work. It didn't work. It will never work.

The reason why it didn't work was because Israel had America in its back pocket. And that's why Israel didn't have to be a good neighbor to Iraq or Iran or Libya or Lebanon or Syria and especially the Palestinians. Because they had all the might and the military power of the United States behind them. If they didn't, they probably would have to either A, be a good neighbor or B, wouldn't even exist anymore.

So that's why it didn't work out just for some unknown, just because it doesn't just work. It just doesn't work. It's a square peg in a round hole. It just doesn't work. Like they tried it. No, what they tried was occupation with the might of the U.S. military behind it. That's what they tried. So this is a pipe dream that he has. It's making it up. It's turning him into immediately war criminal.

And he's immediately turning his back on what he promised people. Here's another one. Trump was asked if he supports Israel's annexation of the West Bank. His response, although cryptic, was to say Israel's too small, effectively saying yes. I say this without hyperbole. If Israel annexes the West Bank, that will be the end of Israel. Oh, well, let's hear him say it. It's a small country in terms of land. I take see this pen, this wonderful pen.

My desk is the Middle East. And this pen, the top of the pen, that's Israel. That's not good, right? You know, it's a pretty big difference. I use that as an analogy. It's pretty accurate, actually. So what is he saying? He's saying Israel's too little. We got to make it bigger. That's what he's saying. That's what I that's how I interpret what he's saying. How much extra pen length are we getting out of this? Right. And, you know, so if he's going to turn Gaza into where are those people going to go?

Where are those people? And the world people, he's going to replace Gaza with the world people who I guess don't have a problem with waking up screaming every night from ghosts of children pointing at them. He said they should get a craftmatic so you can sit up in bed and stare back at them. So if you're going to turn Gaza into an amusement park, you're going to send the Palestinians to Disneyland? Where are you going to send them? We're going to live at the casino and maintain it on the reservation.

So, and by the way, Trump, when he says this. It's a small country in terms of land. I take, see this pen, this wonderful pen? My desk is the Middle East. And this pen, the top of the pen, that's Israel. Hey, size isn't everything. Not everybody can be Ron Jeremy, all right? Israel can be. Israel can be.

Let's go one more. President Donald Trump proposal for the U.S. to take over war-ruined Gaza and create a Riviera of the Middle East after resettling Palestinians. How about you create a Riviera in the United States somewhere? How about you do that first? That was what the fight was. It was, oh, they're going to resettle the Palestinians here and Europe. This is the only possibility because the whole genocide got done.

Are they going to send the rest of the people to Europe and here, or is Trump going to cut a deal where they have to take them there in some way? I only saw two possibilities with this. The crime's done. Before the war, there was like 2.2 million Palestinians in Palestine. Trump keeps saying it's 1.8 million. So what that tells you, and why does he keep saying 1.8 million? Glenn Greenwald pointed out, because that's the number he's being told.

And why would they be telling him 1.8 million? That's because they killed way more people than the official count. So if there were 2.2 million Palestinians to start with, and now there's 1.8, I'm not a math major, but that's around 400,000 people that are dead. I bet it's closer to a million left, honestly. I do the double it Carlitos way method. Whatever they're saying, go ahead and double those numbers. Well, they were saying the official count was like 44,000 or something.

but then i said 50 dead in lahaina but that yeah and then i saw estimates of 200 000 so it's you're right double that it's probably 400 000 which would bring us to 1.8 million palestinians left so the world uh after resettling palestinians elsewhere has shattered u.s policy on the israeli palestinian conflict drawing global condemnation no kidding uh

The shock move from Trump, a longtime New York property developer, drew rebukes from international powers, including Russia, China, Germany, who said it would bring new suffering and new hatred. Regional heavyweight Saudi Arabia rejected the proposal outright. Really? Let me guess. So do some of the other Arab countries, but they're going to let it happen anyway, right? Yeah. Oh, did they condemn it? You don't say. What's that matter?

Trump, in his first major Middle East policy announcement, said he envisioned building a resort where international communities could live in harmony after over 15 months of Israeli bombardment devastated the tiny coastal enclave and killed more than 47,000 people by Palestinian tallies. I'm telling you that's way more than that. That's not even close.

Oh, are they going to be a real 15 minute city now? Is that what it is? It's going to be like it's going to be like Vegas, but with more bodies buried underneath your feet. Oh, that's good luck. Oh, blowing my dice ghost. It's not clear whether Trump will go ahead with his controversial proposal or simply taking an extreme position as a bargaining strategy.

Trump said that he plans to visit Gaza, Israel, and Saudi Arabia, but did not say when he will go. Everybody loves it, Trump told reporters at the office on Wednesday. Everybody loves it. That's classic Trump. Everybody loves it. Do the 1.8 million Palestinians love it? No. How about everybody in Iran? How about the Houthis in Yemen? Do they love it? No. How about Hezbollah? No.

Apparently, the people, well, where is it? People in Germany, Russia, China, Germany, they said no. They don't think it's great. Everybody loves it. Everybody loves it. Michael Milstein, a former intelligence officer on one of Israel's leading specialists on Hamas, and one of Israel's leading specialists on Hamas, said Trump's comments put Israel on a collision course with its Arab neighbors.

Maybe Trump is trying to promote pressure on the Arab states so they will not create any obstacles if he tries to promote a normalization between Saudi Arabia and Israel. So maybe. Maybe.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who met on Wednesday with U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance, would not be drawn into discussing the proposal other than to praise Trump for trying a new approach. Jordan's King Abdullah said on Wednesday he rejected any moves to annex land and displace Palestinians. They already have, I think, 1.5 million Palestinians. Can you see how many Palestinians are in Jordan? I always forget.

Jimmy, let's get down to brass tacks, though, about what really matters. That Gaza natural gas, that's our natural gas? I don't hear the part about the natural gas. So there's a half a trillion dollars at least in natural gas. Approximately three million. Approximately three million Palestinians already in Jordan. So now they can build that canal. Israel wants to build a canal that competes with the Suez Canal. Am I right about that? Yes.

They can do that. They can then get all the gas and be exporters of gas to Europe. That's what they've always wanted, too. They'll be an energy exporter. Remember BB's video where he's talking to the family about what his plans are with America? Yeah. Which are pretty bad. Then he tells them to turn the camera off. Well, now we know the part he said, but the camera off.

Egypt said it would back Gaza recovery plans following a ceasefire that took effect on January 18th without PEL. So Egypt will... No, Egypt wants them to stay. Jordan wants them to stay. So where are you going to send them? You're going to send them to Canada? Because most of Canada is empty.

In Gaza, Palestinians living among the wreckage of their former home said they would never accept the idea. Trump can go to hell, which, to be fair, he goes there five times a week. He could go to hell with his ideas, with his money, and with his beliefs. We are going nowhere. We are not some of his assets, said Samir Abu Basel in Gaza City.

Well, don't go off one guy. I mean, yeah. U.S. National Security Advisor Mike Waltz on Wednesday downplayed the idea of U.S. was walking away from the longstanding Middle East policy. I certainly didn't hear the president say it was the end of the two state solution. OK. OK. Hey, also, will we be preventing Netanyahu from funding Hamas now at least?

Right. Now that we own it, are we going to prevent Israelis from sending money to Hamas? I hope that's part of the deal. An official from Palestinian militant group Hamas, which ruled the Gaza Strip before the war. Israel actually ruled the Gaza Strip. Yeah. They said Trump's proposal was ridiculous and absurd. So Hamas says that any ideas of this kind are capable of igniting the region.

Said Sami Abu Zurid, he told Reuters, saying Hamas, what do you want to say? It's as absurd as a hang glider attack on a rave. Saying Hamas remains committed to the ceasefire accord with Israel and negotiating its next phase.

I like how they say the Palestinian militant group, which ruled Gaza. You know, how about they never say, oh, he's from Hamas. You know, that militant group that is completely funded by Israel. The main prison gang of the concentration camp, I guess. Yeah.

Itmar Ben-Gavur, a far-right Israeli lawmaker and former minister for national security, said encouraging Gazans to emigrate was the only correct strategy to end the Gaza war and urged Netanyahu to adopt the policy immediately. Really? Gaza residents said after the war and bombs had failed to eject them from Gaza that Trump would not succeed in doing so.

As fighting raged in the Gaza war, Palestinians feared they would suffer another Nakba or catastrophe. The time when hundreds of thousands were dispossessed of their homes in the war at the birth of the state of Israel in 1948. OK, why is he why is Trump saying that they'll just still live there?

And there is that because there's no way that's like, I don't understand. He's just saying that or because they all like he's not going to eject us. And I don't hear him saying that. But is that like the secret plan? Now they fare another round of displacement. We will not leave our areas, said Um Tamir Jamal, a 65 year old mother of six.

We have brought our kids up teaching them that they can't leave their home and they can't allow a second Nakba. I think that would be like the third or the fourth Nakba, actually. Nakba means catastrophe, right? So all that carpet bombing Israel did would be the second Nakba, technically. I mean, as long as we're counting Nakbas. Yeah, we're into probably our fourth Nakba at this point. Yeah. So...

Watch this. It says, President Trump declared on Tuesday that he would seek to permanently displace the entire Palestinian population of Gaza and take over the devastated seaside enclave as a U.S. territory, one of the most audacious ideas that any American leader has advanced in years. Audacious, they call it. Audacious. Does that mean good or bad? Is that like infamous with El Guapo? It means famous.

Who wouldn't love to sit out and catch some rays on the West Palm Beach? I mean, West Bomb Beach. So obviously these people are saying that's a look at how bold he's being there. They're saying audacious in the good way. They're not saying it in a bad way.

So let's see that he didn't. OK, when I was watching him talk, maybe I missed him saying, I declare I'm going to expel them. They're saying he's he declared he's going to have them sent out. But in that meeting is now they can live. I was saying was even stranger, like all the world people will live there with them. But when did he say that he's going to expel them? I'm just trying to figure out, like, well, he said that they had he said, no, I he said that they would.

He said that they would, they're going to build houses. He said it. Here, I'll play it. He said it. He said they're going to build places for them somewhere else. Not in Gaza. Okay. Yeah. The only reason the Palestinians want to go back to Gaza is they have no alternative. It's right now a demolition site. This is just a demolition site. Virtually every building is down. They're living under fallen concrete that's very dangerous and very precarious.

They instead can occupy all of a beautiful area with homes and safety. He said they instead can occupy a beautiful area with homes. And so he says that I guess he's going to build it somewhere. Can live out their lives in peace and harmony instead of having to go back and do it again.

The U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip. So right there he said, so they could live somewhere else with nice homes and in peace instead of going back to Gaza and having this conflict again. So his idea is like it doesn't work to have Palestinians living in Gaza. That's his state. But then he did say when they asked who's going to, he said world people, all kinds of people. So when he said Palestinians, I think he means like, you know, a couple hundred. The ones from the West Bank? So...

This is a pretty interesting Matt Kennard, friend of the show. He says, this is why the Gulf dictatorships don't lift a finger for Palestine. Most of them were installed by the British Empire. So trap mafia families put in place to keep their people subjugated and resources flowing to London and Washington. Similar regime just installed in Syria. That's exactly what we just did.

We just installed terrorists, brutal dictator terrorists. The head of Al Qaeda now runs Syria. And who installed them? We did. The United States and Israel and Turkey. So, and then he goes into, he shows you Kuwait, Syria.

Since 1752 they were installed. Bahrain in 1783, United Arab Emirates, Qatar since 1847, ruled by the House of Saudi Arabia since 1930, ruled by the House of Saud since 1932.

political parties banned there's no free press no opposition activists the active opposition activists are beheaded women not allowed to drive until 2018 they supported bahrain crackdown leads yemen war you see kuwait it says uh i can't remember most of the key ministries held by the al-saba family i'm pretty sure most of the people in kuwait that is their surname

Oh, really? Yeah, like if you're really from Kuwait, you all have the same last name. It's like a country of one family. Look, we get how it works. We all saw John Wick 3. This is the hot table. Whitney Webb says, a U.S. long-term ownership plan of Gaza is just a nicer way of saying another U.S. long-term military occupation of the Middle East on behalf of Israel.

If you think this will bring stability to the Middle East, you learn nothing from the war on terror era at all. Look how we brought stability to Iraq. Look how we brought stability to Libya. Look how we brought stability to Afghanistan. Look how we brought stability to Syria. Look, we're going to do that. That's not how it works. When you send U.S. military there, you create chaos, havoc, death and destruction. What?

Oh, but Jimmy, here's the important difference. The old ones, they weren't entirely carpet bomb first. And I think that's going to be the key for a win here. They've completely leveled every square inch of it. What I don't understand is now that we're admitting that's the thing, isn't that the war crime that they said they weren't doing? Yes. Nothing's going to happen with that. So she goes on and says, um,

This policy toward Gaza is so extremely neoconservative, it goes even beyond the Bush era. Back then, they at least had to feign occupations were justified by allegedly going after the U.S. invisible enemies. So now we're not even saying we're going after U.S. invisible enemies in Gaza. We're just saying we're going to take over that place and we're going to turn it into a to Las Vegas. And that's that because we can.

They're not even at least Bush pretended when he went into Iraq, they were fighting the people who somehow did 9-11 and would do it again. And all these people that were putting this, I think it's obnoxious that all this time and you're this two state solution shit. And then you find out the plan was to make sure that could never happen all along, all along.

And so now, I mean, all the plans, they might as well be like something on TV because whatever the deals are, they're not telling you them. Like people are going to say, I denounce this, but they're going to go with it and all vice versa. And, uh,

Really, at this point, I think he's going to skate on this because most people don't even like talking about this no more. They're sick of it. Why don't you just get it out of my sight? But they're going to be forced to talk about it because this ain't going to go the way... The Palestinians aren't going to go, okay. Hezbollah's not going to go, okay. The Houthis aren't going to go, okay.

The way they see our non-binary troops on the border there. There's just as many Hamas today as there was when the war started. I would say probably more. Probably more. So this is the UN Special Rapporteur. Francis Albany says...

The president's plan for Gaza is nonsense, which nonetheless must be taken very seriously. President Trump has basically declared his intention to commit the international crime of forced displacement and resort to unlawful use of force against the Palestinian people and their right to self-determination in violation of the UN Charter amounting to aggression.

Then 191 members of the UN who still have an interest in protecting themselves from this madness better recover from their paralysis and stand united against this imperialistic, this imperialist lawlessness. P.S. And in any case, this plan won't work. How do I know? 76 years of failed attempts by Israel, including 16 months of genocidal assault. Indigenous people do not leave their land.

But they do get put on reservations, and that's what's going to happen. But 100%, they don't go of their own accord. Yeah, so we're going to have to send soldiers over there to herd them into trucks. Well, probably to protect them from Israel as well. Michael Tracy says, some MAGA ideology expert will have to explain how creating some sort of new U.S. protectorate in the Middle East will reduce foreign U.S. military entanglements. Exactly. This is exactly a betrayal of...

Of the MAGA ideology. Will Chamberlain says, not Wilt, you guys aren't thinking big enough about what Trump is saying about Gaza. The Gaza Strip will be ours.

American property, American sovereignty and our overseas territory, not someone else's territory where we are. So now we're going to steal it from Palestine. Wait, where's the gas, though? Well, hey, I'm thinking even bigger. Well, yeah, where's all that natural gas going? Is it our property? Because if it's not our property, then this is like an even worse deal than then, you know, just the genocide thing. But bygones be bygones.

He says, it's our property where we can enforce our immigration rules. It will reshape the Middle East. We won't be dependent on Carter to host our military base in the region. We literally will have our own sovereign territory the size of Las Vegas, perfectly located. Do you see this as the exact opposite of what Trump said? We want to pull out of the Middle East. We don't want to do a nation building. We don't want to get into these foreign entanglements. It's more of a casino building, I guess, is what he's saying. Yeah. Yeah.

Trump's pledge to take over Gaza offered a rare opportunity to hear an American president articulate the logic of Zionism in its rawest, most essential form. The history of Israel is defined by a continuous process of controlling and removing the Palestinian population by force.

with the consent of the participation of the majority of its Jewish citizens in order to demographically engineer a hervonok. I don't know what that is. A pseudo- Heronvolk? A heronvolk? Pseudo-democracy. Now, Trump has vowed to carry out the final solution on Israel's behalf and possibly with U.S. troops.

Israelis love his genocidal energy, with 80% telling the Jerusalem Post they favor Trump's plan and only 13% declaring it immoral. Average Americans might be less enthusiastic about embarking on a foreign ethnic cleansing adventure. But as this episode makes undeniably clear, they are not the ones who determine their government's policy when it comes to the Jewish and democratic state.

Jimmy, a Herrenvolk democracy is a nominally democratic form of government where only a specific ethnic group has voting rights. That's what that is. OK, so there you go. This is a betrayal of the MAGA ideology. This is the opposite ideology.

This is nation building. This is imperialism. This is he's going to have to send American troops over there to forcibly remove people from their own land in an ethnic cleansing operation.

and this is the opposite of america first this is israel first hey you know here's another great way you can help support the show is you become a premium member we give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week and it's a great way to help support the show you can do it by going to jimmydorkcomedy.com clicking on join premium

It's the most affordable premium program in the business, and it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards. Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member, and if you haven't, you're missing out. We give you lots of bonus content. Thanks for your support. Holy S, the FBI just revealed that 5,000 out of their 13,000 agents

were focused on January 6th protesters. That's 39% of the entire bureau were focused on hunting down and building cases against the January 6th protesters. That doesn't even, that's not counting the amount of FBI people who were in the crowd that day. That's just, so remember when, so this is congressman,

and former law enforcement, this is how many, he says, conservatively, FBI and FBI assets were in the crowd creating that riot you saw. 99% of the people at January 6th were nonviolent. And that's why they showed this picture of the people inside the Capitol were still walking respectfully in between the ropes. Do you think some of the agents are disguised as statues in there?

Right. So listen to what he says. How many? So five thousand. So almost four out of 10 FBI people were working on trying to get January 6 protesters. Half almost half the agency was dedicated to that. A handful of people. And so watch what Clay Higgins says. How many were actually in the January 6th? Gradually, professionally rolling that evidence out.

You sort of answered the question right there in larger terms. You just said that elements within the federal government, I assume law enforcement, intel, and military, and I'm using your words, lured Americans to Washington into what you call the trap. Yes, sir. That guy said 200, at least, because conservative number, 200 FBI and FBI assets were already...

were in the crowd inciting people to do stuff all and they were inside the capitol before the riot started dressed as maga supporters there were police took off their uniforms put on maga stuff inside the capitol so now my big question is here's my big question to you kurt

Yeah. So if they would, if the FBI is going to go through all this trouble, because all this is, is to try to discredit Trump's political movement. So they wanted to they wanted to get Trump committing a crime of insurrection, which they couldn't. He was never charged with that because he didn't do that.

But they tried. And that's why they did those other four cases that are completely bogus, made up. And in fact, Andrew Cuomo said it was garbage, the charges they brought against him in New York. Of course. Dude, Jimmy, not just that. You got all these people. These are the people that were willing to show up to protest. So now you got them all in one place and know where they are. You can put charges on them. They can never own guns again. It's like you're eliminating an entire chunk of movement.

You know what I mean? Yes, that's right. We're going to eliminate the whole movement in one swoop. And so that so they tried to get rid of Trump didn't work. But then they put almost half the FBI on trying to dismantle his political organ or a movement. So my question is, why would they go through that much trouble to dismantle his political movement only to allow him to get power again?

Why would they do that? Now, some people say, oh, it's just the Yankees versus the Cowboys. Two sides of the deep state. Or, you know, the Rockefellers versus the tech bros. That's what some people say. I think that's a little too simplistic of an explanation. So which ones were running the FBI? Because obviously the ones who were against Trump, let's say Trump is a cowboy, so obviously the Yankees were running

That's an old designation. I don't think Yankee and Cowboys is still how it is. Those lines have shifted quite a bit.

uh because a lot of yankees and cowboys are together that's the whole new world order that's right that's the who that's exactly right so but if you follow cia or fbi people talk about being in it they've been weeding just like in hollywood just like your friends don't talk to you anybody that ain't going along with the thing got weeded out they're not getting promoted they're going to get driven out every industry

Anyone who was qualified was there's no good people in the FBI. I don't believe that. But if you were someone that believed in the thing, you got weeded out enough so that we could do what we want for a long time. That's why they don't want the books opening. And we even reported on the questionnaire that they gave to FBI employees asking them, do you know anybody here who's sympathetic to MAGA? Do you know anybody here who's sympathetic to January 6th? And then they would try to get they'd weed those people out.

You're already trained to trust the system because you're trying to be in the FBI. That's right. You never did drugs. That's what they told us in school. Don't ever do any drugs because you can't work at the FBI or Secret Service. And so you're already a person that follows orders by nature. And you believe in it, though. You're not bad. And then you've got to confront that. And like now, you're not going to get an A in your career or you've got to turn away. So the people who were against Trump in the deep state,

were running the FBI, obviously, because they assigned half the FBI to go after him and his movement. Let's say about 40% of them worked for the Deep State. But the people who were running the FBI, so definitely all the people in charge...

So then why would they then allow Trump to become president? Why wouldn't they, if they're willing to do that, if they're willing to lie, if they're willing to lie to the FISA court 17 times so they could get, if they're willing to do the dossier, which they knew was a lie, they lied about Papadopoulos, they lied about the FBI constantly, Russiagate was one big conspiracy theory invented by the FBI in the Clinton campaign.

If they're willing to do all that, why would the FBI then all of a sudden go, oh, well, I guess he won the election. Why would they do that? Driving them out.

But why would they allow that to happen is my question, Kurt. The guy missed. The guy that shot missed. The other guy missed. So that's what a lot of people said. They said, well, they tried to get him. They gave him a clear. They got this Patsy. Boy, was that guy ever a Patsy. They got this guy who has no social media presence, all scrubbed. Nobody knows anything about him. They let him get on the three different platforms.

Secret Service people saw the guy. They let him climb on top of the roof of the building that the Secret Service was in. They let him get on top. They let him get a clear shot. He got at least three shots off. And so you're saying...

So a lot of people are saying-

And so I keep thinking about that thing because Scott Ritter said, because I asked him about it, he goes, yeah, they think there's some kind of bunker that they're going to go to, but it's not there anymore. Those haven't been paid for in you. But I think something happened behind the scenes because just like that DNC,

Just like that DNC thing where I'm like, they all look like robots not getting instructions anymore. So I don't know what is different that I above my pay grade to know. But so that's such a. Yeah. So I mean, it's like a power structure where you like Kamala can't have a conversation for three hours. She can't. They have to they have to curate it. So she won't say anything that she actually thinks ever. And to get promoted in that system for how long now you had to be like that.

So now whoever's given the orders to the people to do that, it's the orders aren't coming. I don't know why. And I don't know. It is two factors, a deep state. Don't ever think it's not. And so and so and this should outrage you as an American citizen to find this out. If you're not outraged that the FBI is not there to uphold democracy or law and order, they're there to actually go against the people, the democracy, the people elected Donald Trump.

The first time they tried to undercut him at every turn, lied to the FISA court, tapped his phone, did Russiagate. The generals in Syria lied to him about troop numbers. He was being lied to constantly and he was being effed with by the FBI. And Chuck Schumer admitted that the CIA and the FBI doesn't work for the president.

That's right. And so now we don't know who they work for. So this should outrage you. This should outrage you because if they can do this, because like I tried to explain to Cornel West, if they can do this to Donald Trump, someone who's super popular as a populist leader, they could do it to anybody and they will do it to anybody. And they did. I'm sure they did.

He didn't want to be president. They'll do it to Bernie Sanders. They'll do it to Jill Stein. They'll do it to Cornel West. They'll do it to anybody who the establishment doesn't like. That's why this matters. That's why it all, that's why Russiagate always mattered. That's why it always mattered because that's what they'll do. So these are the real criminals. That's who the FBI should have been looking for. Those people.

So here's the article. FBI provides the Trump Justice Department. And so this and this would not have come out if Donald Trump didn't become president. You wouldn't know how corrupt your FBI is. You would not know if if Kamala Harris won the presidency. This would never have come out.

And by the way, it's not, of course, it's not going to be reported the way it should be that, hey, your intelligence agencies are actually the criminals. They're actually the rogues. They're actually the people undermining democracy, not Donald Trump. They're not going to report it that way. But they made COVID with your money? That they made COVID with your money. FBI provides the Trump Justice Department with details about 5,000 employees who worked January 6th cases.

The FBI complied with the order from the President Trump's Justice Department. So who had that on your bingo card? The Justice Department and the FBI would be adversaries and fighting against each other. Isn't that nice? They used to be.

And they provided Department of Justice officials with the information about more than 5,000 employees who worked on investigations related to the January 6, 2021 riot. So they're calling it the riot, not the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, according to the multiple reports. The demand made by acting Deputy Attorney General Emily Bove or Bove last week, Emil, I'm sorry, Emil.

Slomazel, Hots and Peppers, Corporated. Emil Bove, or Emil Bove, last week sparked concern in triggered lawsuits. Triggered lawsuits. Arguing that because they want to cover up their corruption. It sparked lawsuits arguing that the list could put the safety of FBI agents and their families at risk. Boo!

However, the information furnished by the Bureau does not include employee names. And that's according to CNN. On Tuesday. Oh, wow. You can say the Doge nerds that work on Doge, but we're not going to find out who's behind this, right? That's right. We're not allowed to find out the corrupt FBI people who are undermining democracy. Well, we can find out a couple of tech nerds who are trying to do an audit of the Treasury Department, ordered by the President of the United States who just got elected.

On Tuesday, nine FBI agents filed a class action lawsuit against the Justice Department in response to the request, alleging that acting Attorney General James McHenry and other Department of Justice officials were retaliating against them by distributing surveys asking about their involvement in cases against Trump and his supporters in order to be terminated or to suffer the adverse employment action.

The agents asserted that, quote, even if they are not targeted for termination, they may face other retaliatory acts such as demotion, denial of job opportunities or denial of promotions in the future. And yeah, if you are doing nefarious crap and now the current Department of Justice doesn't want you to do it, doesn't doesn't want to reward that behavior. I don't see how that's illegal or worthy of a lawsuit.

You can watch me take a shit every day. Why can't I watch you? That's right. In a separation, in a separate Tuesday filing in D.C. federal court, the FBI's union, they have a union and other anonymous bureau employees asked for a temporary restraining order.

They don't want the Department of Justice to know which FBI people of the 5,000 were working on the January 6th protesters to dismantle the MAGA movement. They don't want anybody to know that. I wonder why they don't want people to know that. Oh, because you could probably pick them out in the video once you have certain information?

publication of the details of any of the agents involvement in the probes would violate their first amendment rights and the privacy act of 1974, as well as due process. That's what the lawsuits allege. Really? Stone picked this up. Like they did the Doge story. Really? That seems kind of crazy. If that's true, if what, if those lawsuits are what they're alleging, if that's true, that seems crazy.

See, this is why I think they're going to dump real information about JFK, because it's to Trump's advantage to put that out and make people distrust them even more, because they're going to try to wiggle out of getting audited. But think of the anger when Epstein stuff comes out. I'm with you about, like, what do you mean it's close? Just dump it on him. But I'll bet it's strategically being dumped for this. So here is the guy who's the head of the House committee who's supposed to take care of this. Listen to this. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau within the federal government.

Well, you know, I'm chairman of the oversight subcommittee in judiciary and we're going to dig into this stuff. The FBI, the Department of Justice, the Attorney General, DEA, most of the folks working in these agencies are good people that are working on the street. But the people at the top, what they did, you know, wanting to implant people in traditional Roman Catholic churches. This is what the FBI did.

creating and working to create the Steele dossier, which was a complete lie, working with a guy by the name of Igor Danchenko, giving him hundreds of thousands of dollars, using his lies to go after President Trump. Again, a horrible thing. Going after parents and school boards, terrible. Misusing FISA. They misused FISA going after people they didn't agree with. They misused FISA going after boyfriends, girlfriends, husbands, and wives millions of times.

So that's the that's Jeff Van Drew. He's the chairman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee. I suspect it's not cowboys and Yankees anymore. It's the battle of fascist versus pervert. And there's a lot of overlap between the two. There's a real revolving door between the fascist and pervert factions. Yeah, I I don't know the answer to that. Why the FBI would put so much energy into dismantling MAGA and then just go ahead and let it happen.

Because it's the same people who were trying to dismantle MAGA were the same people who let Trump become president. So they didn't switch from dismantling January MAGA's movement and Trump's election. Those are the same people in charge, the same people running things, the same people putting five. So that didn't switch. So that doesn't make sense. Well, that shows you the extent of their power.

Look, a pyramid structure is everybody has a certain level of power. So there's a lot of lawfare crap. Do you understand? Yeah. There's no actual, they couldn't find real crimes. So they, you know, they literally couldn't find them and make them up. So it's very complicated operation and they have to maintain a semblance of this is legal what we're doing. So people tried to kill them. So that's the extra legal means. The FBI is not the top of the heap with that. COG, what can COG get away with?

And then they all probably answer something worse at the top is my guess. And COG stands for continuance of government, which you're not allowed to talk about even in Congress congressional hearings. Nancy Pelosi brought it up herself when Trump was sick with COVID. She goes, don't worry, we got COG. It's the only time I've ever seen them voluntarily bring it up was Nancy Pelosi doing it. Trump got COVID.

So that's so there you go. Either way, I don't I don't know if we'll ever know the answer as to why the FBI allowed Trump to become president when they were so committed to stopping dismantling his movement and stopping George because they're not in charge. No, that's what occurred. How many times I got to explain this. The same people who did Russiagate, the same people who.

who put 5,000 people on the January 6th to dismantle MAGA, were still running the FBI when Trump got elected. Right. So now they're not in charge. Now.

But they were in charge when he got elected. So that's the question. The question is, if they would put so much energy into dismantling MAGA, why would they then just let him become president? Because it's the same people. So now they're being dismantled, the FBI. Now that Trump is in control. I'm saying a different thing. I'm saying the people above them giving like 5,000 people on it, that's orders from above. You don't think that comes from the top of the FBI? No.

I think they're taking orders from somebody above them, such as COG. The Secret Service, why they security strip him. Why is that lady from COG, the one that brought Cheney to the bunker, Kimberly Cheadle? COG. So I don't know what fell apart with COG, but I bet you that's what the dismantling is, because the FBI is muscle. They're not the brains of it. Okay. You know what I mean? Like USAID, I had no idea, was bigger than all of them. Yeah, USAID. I think they got more money. More money than the CIA and the FBI combined. Yeah.

Yeah, like that really genuinely surprised me. So I don't know, like the people in charge, I think it has to do with NGOs and all that kind of wef stuff. They're working for the New World Order. So whoever's the top of that, it's probably people you never heard of. You didn't elect them. That's for God, I'm sure. Hey, become a premium member. Go to JimmyDoreComedy.com. Sign up. It's the most affordable premium program in the business.

Don't freak out. Don't freak out. All the voices performed today are by the one and only, the inimitable Mike McRae. He can be found at MikeMcRae.com. I'm not, I'm not, I'm not, I'm not, I'm not. That's it for this week. You be the best you can be, and I'll keep being me. Don't freak out. Don't, don't, don't, don't, don't, don't, don't, don't freak out. Don't, don't, don't, don't, don't, don't, don't.

Do not freak out.