We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Introducing: Assembly Required with Stacey Abrams

Introducing: Assembly Required with Stacey Abrams

2025/1/1
logo of podcast Pod Save America

Pod Save America

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
C
Celine Gounder
S
Stacey Abrams
Topics
Stacey Abrams: 新政府及其政策蓝图《2025计划》对美国社会各个方面构成威胁,其中医疗保健首当其冲。 政府意图削弱甚至摧毁卫生与公众服务部(HHS),该部门负责管理医疗保险、医疗补助、食品药品监督管理局(FDA)、疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)等重要机构。 政府还计划将CDC一分为二,这将削弱其提供公共卫生指导的能力,并延缓紧急响应。 此外,政府还计划干预FDA的药物审批流程,例如取消米非司酮的批准,以及将医疗补助金改为块状拨款,这将使各州更容易拒绝为弱势群体提供医疗保健。 这些政策变化,加上对HHS、CDC和FDA等机构领导职位的有争议的提名,例如任命罗伯特·F·肯尼迪小为卫生与公众服务部长,都对美国的公共卫生和医疗保健体系构成严重威胁。 为了应对这些挑战,Abrams强调了在地方一级采取行动的重要性,并鼓励公民参与到公共卫生问题的讨论和解决中。 Celine Gounder: 新冠疫情期间,科学和公共卫生受到了政治攻击,因为科学结论在政治上不受欢迎。 虽然卫生与公众服务部长不需要是科学家,但必须有合格的科学专家为其提供建议。新政府试图削弱公务员的保护,这将影响科学建议的质量。 对科学原则的轻视也体现在对其他关键职位,例如FDA和NIH领导职位的提名上。 在公共卫生决策中,需要在科学和价值观之间取得平衡,但科学应该作为基础。 美国对公共卫生的投资不足,数据系统薄弱,州一级的权力对公共卫生的影响很大。 公民应该关注州一级的立法和当地卫生部门的工作,并在地方一级采取行动,因为公共卫生权力主要在州一级。 公共卫生与医疗保健的区别在于,公共卫生关注人口健康,而医疗保健关注个体患者。公共卫生还包括空气质量、水质、社区安全和健康食品获取等方面。 为了应对新政府对公共卫生的攻击,公民应该参与到地方事务中,例如社区卫生委员会,并关注影响他们社区的具体问题,例如学校附近的污染、社区暴力和阿片类药物过量等。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

What is Project 2025 and why is it significant for public health?

Project 2025 is a 900-page policy blueprint published by the conservative think tank, the Heritage Foundation. It outlines a conservative agenda that could undermine civil rights, environmental protections, public education, and healthcare. For public health, it proposes dismantling the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), splitting the CDC into two agencies, and altering the FDA's drug approval process, among other measures. These changes could severely impact public health infrastructure and emergency response capabilities.

Why is the nomination of RFK Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services controversial?

RFK Jr.'s nomination is controversial because he has promoted sensationalist conspiracy theories on public health, which have been criticized by 77 Nobel laureates. They argue that his leadership would jeopardize public health and undermine America's global leadership in health sciences. His appointment reflects the incoming administration's focus on rejecting scientific expertise in favor of politically convenient narratives.

What are the potential impacts of splitting the CDC into two agencies?

Splitting the CDC into one agency for data collection and another for public policy recommendations would weaken its authority to provide public health guidance. This division could slow emergency responses, hinder state and local governments' reliance on CDC guidance, and create inefficiencies in addressing public health crises, such as pandemics.

How does the privatization of Medicare proposed in Project 2025 affect older and disabled Americans?

Privatizing Medicare could lead to inferior coverage for older and disabled Americans. While Medicare Advantage plans may offer additional benefits like dental and vision, they often provide less comprehensive coverage when patients need critical care. This shift could reduce access to essential healthcare services and increase out-of-pocket costs for vulnerable populations.

What is the difference between public health and individual healthcare?

Public health focuses on population-level health issues, such as air and water quality, access to healthy food, and disease prevention, and is largely funded by the government. Individual healthcare, on the other hand, is patient-focused and occurs in clinical settings like hospitals and clinics. Public health addresses broader societal factors that influence health outcomes, while healthcare deals with individual medical treatment.

Why is the FDA's role in drug approval critical, and how could it be impacted by Project 2025?

The FDA ensures the safety and efficacy of drugs, food, and medical devices. Project 2025 proposes altering the FDA's drug approval process, such as revoking approval for medications like mifepristone. These changes could undermine public trust in the FDA, reduce access to safe medications, and prioritize political agendas over scientific evidence.

What are the implications of turning Medicaid into block grants?

Block grants would provide fixed amounts of federal funding to states for Medicaid, regardless of actual healthcare costs or population needs. This could lead to reduced access to healthcare for low-income, elderly, and disabled individuals, as states might cut services or eligibility to manage limited funds. It would also reduce federal accountability and oversight.

How does the lack of investment in public health data systems impact pandemic response?

Underinvestment in public health data systems, such as outdated methods like faxing data to the CDC, hampers real-time data collection and analysis. This slows emergency responses, limits the ability to track outbreaks, and reduces the effectiveness of public health interventions during crises like pandemics.

What role do state and local governments play in public health?

State and local governments hold primary responsibility for public health powers, including implementing mandates, vaccination programs, and emergency responses. They rely on federal funding and guidance but have significant autonomy in how they address public health issues. This decentralized system can lead to varying levels of preparedness and response across states.

How can individuals advocate for public health at the local level?

Individuals can advocate for public health by engaging with local health departments, attending community health board meetings, and participating in state and local policy discussions. Building awareness, supporting data-driven policies, and collaborating with local organizations can help address public health issues like pollution, gun violence, and access to healthcare.

Chapters
This chapter explores the potential threats to public health under the incoming Trump administration, focusing on key appointments and policy proposals. It highlights concerns regarding the nominations of individuals who have expressed skepticism towards established scientific consensus and the potential dismantling of crucial public health agencies.
  • Potential dismantling of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
  • Proposed split of the CDC into two agencies
  • Concerns over drug approval process changes by the FDA
  • Medicaid transformation into block grants at the state level
  • Nominations of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Mehmet Oz, and Marty Makary to key positions raising concerns in the medical and scientific communities

Shownotes Transcript

In this episode of Assembly Required with Stacey Abrams, Stacey speaks to Dr. Céline Gounder, an infectious disease specialist, epidemiologist and editor at large for public health at KFF Health News, about the threats to public health with the incoming Trump Administration. They talk through Trump’s appointees for the nation’s top health and science agencies like RFK Jr., how to bring scientific thinking back to policy making, and how to differentiate between public health and individual healthcare. Then Stacey explains how to make change by “power-mapping” an issue, finding out who is responsible for the problem, who has jurisdiction over it, and who is already thinking and talking about solutions. Make sure you subscribe to Assembly Required with Stacey Abrams) wherever you get your podcasts and on Youtube, so you don’t miss an episode.

Learn & Do More:

Check out KFF Health News to get health news and read about health policy research, and sign up for their newsletters at KFF.Org/Email