Project 2025 is a 900-page policy blueprint published by the conservative think tank, the Heritage Foundation. It outlines a conservative agenda that could undermine civil rights, environmental protections, public education, and healthcare. For public health, it proposes dismantling the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), splitting the CDC into two agencies, and altering the FDA's drug approval process, among other measures. These changes could severely impact public health infrastructure and emergency response capabilities.
RFK Jr.'s nomination is controversial because he has promoted sensationalist conspiracy theories on public health, which have been criticized by 77 Nobel laureates. They argue that his leadership would jeopardize public health and undermine America's global leadership in health sciences. His appointment reflects the incoming administration's focus on rejecting scientific expertise in favor of politically convenient narratives.
Splitting the CDC into one agency for data collection and another for public policy recommendations would weaken its authority to provide public health guidance. This division could slow emergency responses, hinder state and local governments' reliance on CDC guidance, and create inefficiencies in addressing public health crises, such as pandemics.
Privatizing Medicare could lead to inferior coverage for older and disabled Americans. While Medicare Advantage plans may offer additional benefits like dental and vision, they often provide less comprehensive coverage when patients need critical care. This shift could reduce access to essential healthcare services and increase out-of-pocket costs for vulnerable populations.
Public health focuses on population-level health issues, such as air and water quality, access to healthy food, and disease prevention, and is largely funded by the government. Individual healthcare, on the other hand, is patient-focused and occurs in clinical settings like hospitals and clinics. Public health addresses broader societal factors that influence health outcomes, while healthcare deals with individual medical treatment.
The FDA ensures the safety and efficacy of drugs, food, and medical devices. Project 2025 proposes altering the FDA's drug approval process, such as revoking approval for medications like mifepristone. These changes could undermine public trust in the FDA, reduce access to safe medications, and prioritize political agendas over scientific evidence.
Block grants would provide fixed amounts of federal funding to states for Medicaid, regardless of actual healthcare costs or population needs. This could lead to reduced access to healthcare for low-income, elderly, and disabled individuals, as states might cut services or eligibility to manage limited funds. It would also reduce federal accountability and oversight.
Underinvestment in public health data systems, such as outdated methods like faxing data to the CDC, hampers real-time data collection and analysis. This slows emergency responses, limits the ability to track outbreaks, and reduces the effectiveness of public health interventions during crises like pandemics.
State and local governments hold primary responsibility for public health powers, including implementing mandates, vaccination programs, and emergency responses. They rely on federal funding and guidance but have significant autonomy in how they address public health issues. This decentralized system can lead to varying levels of preparedness and response across states.
Individuals can advocate for public health by engaging with local health departments, attending community health board meetings, and participating in state and local policy discussions. Building awareness, supporting data-driven policies, and collaborating with local organizations can help address public health issues like pollution, gun violence, and access to healthcare.
In this episode of Assembly Required with Stacey Abrams, Stacey speaks to Dr. Céline Gounder, an infectious disease specialist, epidemiologist and editor at large for public health at KFF Health News, about the threats to public health with the incoming Trump Administration. They talk through Trump’s appointees for the nation’s top health and science agencies like RFK Jr., how to bring scientific thinking back to policy making, and how to differentiate between public health and individual healthcare. Then Stacey explains how to make change by “power-mapping” an issue, finding out who is responsible for the problem, who has jurisdiction over it, and who is already thinking and talking about solutions. Make sure you subscribe to Assembly Required with Stacey Abrams) wherever you get your podcasts and on Youtube, so you don’t miss an episode.
Learn & Do More:
Check out KFF Health News to get health news and read about health policy research, and sign up for their newsletters at KFF.Org/Email