We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Jon Stewart on Trump’s Inauguration and Elon Musk's Nazi Salute | Brooke Harrington

Jon Stewart on Trump’s Inauguration and Elon Musk's Nazi Salute | Brooke Harrington

2025/1/21
logo of podcast The Daily Show: Ears Edition

The Daily Show: Ears Edition

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
B
Brooke Harrington
D
Desi Lydic
J
Jon Stewart
J
Josh Johnson
M
Michael Kosta
Topics
Jon Stewart: 我是脱口秀主持人,见证了特朗普的就职典礼。这次就职典礼与四年前他煽动国会暴乱的场景形成鲜明对比,他似乎没有表现出任何悔意。拜登总统与特朗普夫妇的会面也体现了权力交接的复杂性。许多曾警告美国人警惕特朗普的人也出席了他的就职典礼,这具有讽刺意味。科技巨头们掌控着主要的通讯方式,他们的出席反映了他们对特朗普的支持以及由此可能带来的潜在影响。拜登总统在其任期结束前夕赦免了他的家人,这引发了人们对其行为的质疑。特朗普再次当选总统以及拜登总统赦免家人的行为,共同构成了缺乏问责制的循环。马丁·路德·金纪念日与特朗普就职典礼同一天举行,这形成了强烈的对比,引发了人们对美国政治现状的反思。 Brooke Harrington: 我是达特茅斯学院的经济社会学家,研究超级富豪的行为。特朗普的就职典礼上科技巨头们的集体出现与以往不同,这反映了美国寡头政治的独特之处。与俄罗斯寡头政治不同,特朗普与美国科技巨头之间缺乏明确的界限,这使得他们的政治影响力更加难以预测。美国的“兄弟寡头政治”(broligarchy)与以往的寡头政治不同,他们拥有明确的政治议程,并试图以反民主的方式行使权力。当前的寡头政治与镀金时代有所不同,主要体现在社会规范的缺失和对政治的直接干预上。俄罗斯寡头政治类似于金字塔式结构,普京作为权力中心,从寡头们那里获取利益。特朗普利用其政府权力来增强其与产业之间的联系,这种裙带资本主义模式的透明度提高了。当前的寡头政治模式消除了所有民主约束和社会规范,这是一种极其危险的情况。我们不应该仅仅关注个体行为,而应该从社会层面思考如何应对寡头政治的挑战。要阻止寡头政治的蔓延,可能需要采取激进的措施,例如革命或大规模罢工。强大的工会能够对抗寡头,成为一股向善的力量。互联网和社交媒体加剧了社会分裂,阻碍了人们团结起来对抗寡头政治。 Michael Kosta: 我是每日秀的记者,报道了特朗普就职典礼。特朗普就职后,经济指标出现积极变化,这被认为是其政策的积极影响。 Desi Lydic: 我是每日秀的记者,报道了特朗普就职典礼。反对特朗普的人对他的政策和行为感到震惊和担忧。 Josh Johnson: 我是每日秀的记者,报道了特朗普就职典礼。马丁·路德·金纪念日与特朗普就职典礼同一天举行,这具有重要的象征意义。

Deep Dive

Chapters
Jon Stewart's comedic yet critical take on Trump's second inauguration, highlighting the absurdity of the event and questioning the state of American democracy. The presence of tech billionaires, Biden's last-minute pardons, and the overall atmosphere of passive aggression are examined.
  • Trump's return to power four years after the Capitol riot.
  • The presence of tech billionaires like Zuck, Bezos, and Musk.
  • Biden's pardoning of his family members shortly before leaving office.
  • The passive-aggressive nature of the power transfer

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

You're listening to Comedy Central. From the most trusted journalists at Comedy Central, a very special, special report. The Daily Show presents Inauguration 2025. The second and likely final Trump inauguration. With your host, Jon Stewart. Boom! Five and four!

Daily Show. My name is, hold on, my name is John Stewart. I'm your host on this most historic vibe shift of a day.

Donald J. Trump, the 45th president of the United States, a man whose licentious and felonious behavior has been well cataloged and documented, returned to the capital rotunda just four short years after inspiring, in that very place, a day of riotous shitfuckery. Shitfuckery.

Return to the exact same room. Now, generally, if this were a Dateline documentary, he would return to that room to express a form of repentance and maturity and acknowledgement of the pain that had been wrought on that terrible day. But in this show that we're filming now, it's to be sworn in as the 47th president of the United States. And as with most returning to the scene of the crime, it began with T-

with the people you tried to steal it from. A short time ago, President Joe Biden greeted Mr. and Mrs. Trump at the White House for tea, an inaugural tradition. It's always important to keep up the tea tradition when you hand over the keys to, I'm sorry, what did you call them? Hitler? But gotta be a good host, and the Wi-Fi password is White House, but I changed the I to a one. I hope that's not weird.

I'm not saying Biden should have done his own insurrection, but there's got to be a happy medium between storming the Capitol and would you like a crumpet? But everyone showed up. Yes, it's the Supreme Court taxiing in. Oh, please. They're taxiing in like the private jets. Some of them take to caged pheasant hunts. All very legal.

and America's illustrious senators like Amy Klobuchar and Deb Fischer, and of course, Hakeem Jeffries was there, and Fetterman was. Are you, come on! Fetterman? Really? Shorts? It's not even an inaugural decorum thing. It's f***ing freezing out there. It's a health concern. Fetterman is literally America's teenage son. It's your grandma's funeral. I told you I don't

Long pants! Fine, be cold. Even the president's family attended, most of whom didn't have to be warned not to do that weird f***ing thing with their hands. Don't, hey, hey, hey, don't, don't do it with your hands. Can you just be normal for a day? What was he doing? Literally like, look at my dick. Huh, what? No? Okay, okay.

But not to worry. Also attending were all those people who warned Americans to shun this wannabe fascist dictator called Trump. Look at me, Ma! Oh, let's go see Hitler and get a quick selfie first. Hello! Quick one for the gram. Yes, former President Obama was there. George Bush seemed kind of there. Definitely high. Even Mike Pence showed up, I guess, to let the crowd finish the job. Ooh. Ooh. Ooh.

Only Michelle Obama seemed to have the consistent ethical stance of saying, when they go low, I stay the f***. I don't care. I'm staying. Of course, Jill Biden was there, making the strategic choice of keeping her purse on, which, as you know, is the international symbol of f***. But the award for most useful fashion accessory went to the ever-stylish Melania Trump.

whose Audrey Hepburn-esque chapeau, or head cloche, as it's called, doubled as an effective... If you don't control your borders, you don't have it. Meanwhile, many dignitaries went not only hatless, but hairless, with a plethora of stocky, bald billionaires who all seem to go to the same biohack life extension clinic and say, give me the Lex Luthor.

Yes, taking the place of seats normally reserved for Democratic or Republican governors sat Zuck, Bezos, Tim Cook, Elon, Tic Tac Guy, Google Guy, the six guys who control maybe 20% of the world's wealth and 100% of your nudes. You don't need to pretend with me. I don't know what he's talking about. Do it.

Populism, ladies and gentlemen. Shouldn't this gathering be happening in a volcano's lair near Zurich? Or are we just open source Illuminati now? Where's the conspiracy fun in that? Honestly, there is not a useful app of communication not controlled by at least one of these individuals.

And you may not be concerned that they've all ponied up a million dollars to be sitting there and are kissing the ass of a president who openly threatens non-ass kissers. But trust me, shit's going to get weird. Even by that afternoon. This appearance of Elon Musk at an earlier Trump rally is getting loads of attention because of a one-armed gesture he made. This one really matters. And I just want to say thank you for making it happen. Thank you. Thank you.

Okay. Charitably, I'm going to say that was just an awkward, my heart goes out to you gesture. Any of you might have done it like this. You know, even Taylor Swift has done that, you know, my heart, but she almost never does the goes out to you. Like, just always stays with, but you know, listen, it's nerve wracking day. You're not normally a public speaker. It's a one-off gesture. Okay.

Please try not to use it again. You really want to make sure the people in the back see it, I guess. I'm just going to be generous and say maybe that was Elon's attempt at dabbing on the haters. I don't. By the way, do people still dab on haters? Is that was that a very old man? OK. Wasn't that a thing at one time? No, I think I think it's important in these troubled times to continue to dab.

But don't be concerned that these tech titans control Google and TikTok and WhatsApp and Instagram and X and any other way that we communicate in the year of our Lord 2025 because, you know, they're not going to censor us. And it doesn't matter anyway, because I know in my heart we don't need any of them because we'll always have you, messenger pigeon. Oh, how dare you, sir? Messenger pigeon. Why would you turn on me?

I let you live in a cage on my roof surrounded by your own shit. You know, I asked them to make that animation at like five o'clock tonight. It's literally with everything else going on in the show. And I was literally like, could you make me a pigeon doing this? And they were just like, sure. Anyway, then it was time for the swearing in on the kind of on the bottom.

Yes, it turns out Trump didn't actually put his hand on the Bible. Obviously, because one or the other would burst into flames. Perhaps both. And so, ladies and gentlemen, the torch has been passed from Biden to Trump. Yes, the torch has been passed to the same generation of Americans. Let's hear from the 47th president, fresh off the warm embrace of a tea ceremony with his predecessor.

My recent election is a mandate to completely and totally reverse a horrible betrayal and all of these many betrayals that have taken place. He's right behind you. Luckily. Yes, the inaugural speech followed the American tradition of a passive-aggressive transfer of power.

The incoming president gets to completely shit on the outgoing president in front of that president and hopefully his spouse. In recent years, our nation has suffered greatly. Record inflation trying to socially engineer race and gender. Disastrous invasion of our country. It's a radical and corrupt establishment. Vicious, violent, and unfair weaponization. From this moment on, America's decline is over.

This is a tumultuous time in American history filled with much uncertainty and trepidation. But it is very difficult for me to not in any way take the bait of the way he said dick line. It really did sound like he said our dick line. Like the line of our dick. So you can see America's dick line? I mean...

How are you going to end our dick line? With a tuck or a full reassignment? Or is this more about Fetterman's shorts? What about our dick line? I am a child, but as bad as things were, guess what, folks? Daddy's home. It's about to get a hold

I think I just saw JD Vance's dick line. Drill, baby, drill.

But for all the day's eerie energy, one thing stood out to America's watchdogs of democracy. - We have watched as the 47th president of the United States has been sworn in, the cornerstone of democracy. - This is the true transfer of power here of the current president and the former president making this walk. - This process is what distinguishes the United States from a lot of other parts of the world.

It's all just normal shit. It's just another day. It's all just normal transfer power shit. We're just going to play along like all this theater is normal. Oh, except there was one thing that might have given the game away.

With just 20 minutes or so left in his presidency, we've just gotten word from President Biden that he is pardoning his brothers, their wives, his sister, other family members. He says that he is doing this because baseless and politically motivated investigations wreak havoc on the lives of individuals. It's all just normal. First of all, Biden, you're at the inauguration.

Did you auto schedule your pardons? And second of all, what the f***, man? You're just pardoning your whole family. It's not a great look. Yeah, like any good captain, as the ship is going down, Biden gave the order. That lifeboat is for my family. The rest of you can do just like a kind of Jack and Rose thing. One on, one off, 50-50 shot. Who gives a shit? Biden outie.

So the takeaway this entire day was a man who tried to overthrow the government has been peacefully handed the reins of power. And the outgoing president has started a new tradition of blanket pardoning everyone in his orbit. The two men creating a magnificent snake sucking its own dick cycle of no accountability. And then, of course, we end with the grand finale. The attack on Greenland has begun.

Yeah, what are you going to do? For more on the day's events, we go out to the best news team in the country, starting at the Capitol with Michael Kosta and Desi Lydon. You guys are bringing it. Michael Kosta, I'm going to start with you. My friend. What...

What's the mood over there at the inaugural parties tonight? John, it's incredible. Donald Trump hasn't even been president for one whole day, but already unemployment is down, gas is low, my vertical jump increased half an inch, and the stock market is soaring. Yeah, I think, I mean, obviously a lot of that economic stuff was...

happening before noon today, so I don't... I don't think so. Also, Trump made eggs cheap again. I mean, we can eat 10, 20, 30 of these a day. John, they're literally selling them by the dozen. My albumin levels are soaring.

Desi Lydic, you're down there as well. You've been covering blue Washington, as it were. John, I'm with the hashtag resistance, and they are appalled by what they're seeing. The executive orders, the renaming of military bases. They've already renamed the bases after Confederate generals? No, Hitler. It's just Fort Hitler now. It's overwhelming, John. All right, well, try and stay safe out there, Desi. John, if I could say something.

I'm sorry. Yeah. Josh Johnson. Are you? I'm at the Martin Luther King Memorial. Today was also MLK Day. There was a march honoring a man that represented the best about America. Just wanted to put that out there.

Okay, fantastic. Good to keep in mind. John, John, John, can I interrupt? Yes, Michael. I just thought of some more egg stuff. Egg salad, egg creams, eggnog, yawning eggs, eggplants. Thanks to Trump, these things are now super cheap. And the best part about eggs, John, they never expire.

That's definitely not true, Michael. Okay. Well, we'll see what the new Secretary of Health and Human Services has to say about that. Right after he legalizes raw milk. You know, speaking of the letters M, L, and K, let me tell you about someone else we should be celebrating today. Black guy, preacher, and he talked a lot like this. The black guy from the movie Selma?

No. Well, yeah, but no, no. John, I have an update from Resistance headquarters that the Cheetos man is not going to like. Yes, does he do initiatives? Is there another march? Not going to be necessary. I'm hearing Rachel Maddow is coming back five days a week. And when she compares what's happening now to the Shays' Rebellion of 1787, whoo!

I would not want to be Trump. Excuse us. Excuse me. Sorry. I'm sorry. Grace, cool and trend. We're being recognized again. Why are you dressed like a caveman and a robot? We were understudies for the village people. Yeah. Yeah. If the copper Native American gets sick, then cavemen and robots step in. Well, aren't you guys a little like

Ashamed at all about performing at the Trump inauguration, or? Do we look like we're capable of shame, John? Besides, this is fun. Much like it's fun to stay at the... Yeah, that's... You know where it's not fun to stay? How do you... How do you do that?

It's not fun to stay at a Birmingham jail. Josh, can't we just talk about this some other day? It is literally the day to talk about it. Damn it. Am I the only one who thinks it's f***ing crazy that Martin Luther King Day is happening at the same time that Trump is taking power? A man who staged violent resistance is being rewarded with power to the diminishment of our greatest nonviolent resistance leader. This cannot happen.

not halt. And it won't. It's just been renamed Martin Luther Trump Day. So... F***ing news team, everybody. When we come back, Brooke Harrington will be joining me. We'll be right back. Hello, everybody. Welcome back to The Daily Show. My guest tonight, my guest tonight is an economic sociologist at Dartmouth College who studies the behavior of the ultra-rich. Her latest book is called Offshore, Stealth Wealth, and the New Colonialism. Please welcome to the program, Brooke Harrington.

You have studied oligarchy, you have studied the ultra-rich. As you were watching today, I'm going to assume, you were struck by the scenes of the collegial atmosphere. Yeah. Was that odd? Do we normally see all the titans of industries and things in the front row, the box seats? Yes.

No, this is really different. And in fact, I was reflecting on how different this is even from Russian oligarchy, because... Don't now. Okay, that hurts. Sorry. That actually hurts. Sorry. Well, you know, at least Putin had a very clear red line with his oligarchs. The grand bargain of the early 2000s was he was going to let them get rich...

on condition that they kept their noses out of his political business. At most, they would be his errand boys from some diplomatic missions in Europe, for example, on their super yachts. But that was it, and it ended there. And he made a huge example of Mikhail Khodorovsky, who was the Yukos oil chairman who dared to

stand up for transparency and human rights in Russia. And that earned him almost a decade in Russian prison and seizure of all of his assets by Putin. He was lucky to escape with his life. Oh, and so you're not expecting any of our oligarchs to be like, hey...

"Watch what you're doing." Like, none of that. No, but what Trump has done is so extraordinary because he doesn't have that bright line with the new oligarchs of America at all. He's basically said, "Okay, you bought it. Do what you want." But he's blended them. I mean, this, uh, uh, Doge, I mean, he's brought them in to the table. But is there maybe something better about that? Because the explicit bargain is, "Now you have to give us money, or you have to bring business to America."

Well, for me as an American, this is not good news because I like democracy. Tell me more about this. I want to hear about this. I like the sound of it. Yeah. But I'm afraid I'm going to have to be sold. Yeah. Well, the thing about the broligarchs, and this is even different from oligarchs. Stop. Stop. Okay. If that's not trademarked, broligarch. Nice. So,

We've had oligarchs in the past in America. We've had Carnegies and we've had Rockefellers. But aside from making sure they didn't get regulated or taxed too much, they kind of stuck to their own business. They just wanted to get rich. But the broligarchs really have an explicit political agenda, and it is essentially anti-democratic and almost monarchical. So you see them more as like they're in the king's court, right?

And the world has been returned to the more natural order of noblesse oblige or something along those lines.

They're going for noblesse without the oblige. They want all the privileges and none of the obligations. In terms of charitable funding? Philanthropy, any sense of social norms constraining them. I mean, what they're all about is nothing can constrain me. I mean, look what happened when the EU tried to impose its own laws on Elon Musk. J.D. Vance, not even the vice president yet, rolls up on the EU and says...

You you leave our boy alone or we're gonna pull out of NATO. Wait, that's what he said You made this sound very Crips versus Bloods Well, there is a defense rolled up on the EU He just got out of his Benz and went inside Me with the eyeliner and everything right craziness they are explicitly but then what is the political philosophy of

Is it just the great man theory that, you know, the irony of a populist movement relying on the great men to control all that happened? It sounds a lot, actually, like the divine right of kings, but with a pseudoscientific spin. So that's where you get all the Elon bros talking about being high-T alpha males. That's just a 21st century way of saying, God says I'm the king, and you all need to bow down. LAUGHTER

But don't, I mean, at some level, don't you think they're just trolling people with that? Like, do you actually believe they think, I have a high sperm count, so I, I mean, I feel, yes, I, listen, I, I don't know how we went off the rails on that, but that feels a little bit like how much of this is trolling and memes and how much of it, for me, they feel a little bit like, look, we had a Gilded Age.

It doesn't seem that different from the Gilded Age that ushered in industrialization, although now it's more on the digital side. Would that be a charitable way of putting it? Well, I think it's different from the Gilded Age in two important ways. One is the sort of the release of the oblige part of noblesse oblige. These guys are totally released from the constraints of social norms that said,

It was stigmatizing to sit on your wealth like a dragon on a hoard of gold. You had to show that you were doing something for society. Is that why? So when you look at all those national parks of Rockefeller or you look at all that, that's why those guys did that? Yeah. I mean, they didn't necessarily have to be fans of humanity, but they cared about their reputations. And in order to keep a decent reputation, you had to be seen to do something, you know, throwing the public a bone, as it were. But isn't that what these...

oligarchs now, isn't that what their first wives are for? Isn't that... Like, what it seems like now is they divorce their first wife and then their first wife is like, give this all to Planned Parenthood. Like, is that the...

Is that the oblige that's coming out? I only know about the case of Mackenzie Bezos doing that. I think Melinda Gates also gives a truce. Oh, she too, yes. She is doing her part. But it almost seems like a middle finger to the ex-husbands. Like, I'll show you the proper use of wealth, USOB. Really? So let's talk about, though...

When we look at the Russian oligarchs, you talk about Putin is utilizing the wealth of these men, I guess, to fund some of his endeavors or just the amassing of that money covers his own corruption.

My understanding, I'm not a Russia expert, but my understanding from reading the work of people who are, is it's sort of like a pyramid scheme or a mafia operation where the capo de tutti capi sits at the top and takes a percentage of what the lower level henchmen are getting. So, you know, he takes a chunk of Yukos oil and he takes a chunk of Gazprom and that way he stays the wealthiest man in the world. Yeah.

They're earners. So Vladimir Putin like runs Herbalife. Like that's what this is. Yeah. And for Trump, he looks at it as like, I will take my power that I have in government and I will amplify it through industry. But through industry, look, it's almost better to me that it's this explicit. Like I feel like now we have a number.

on what this type of crony capitalism looks like. Elon gave $270 million to get Donald Trump elected. He made, after the election, I think something like $210 billion. So now we have a number on it. We know what their access to government is worth. Is that transparency better for us to even know? Can we do anything about it if we don't even know?

Well, I think you make a good point. It's better that we know and that it not be happening sub rosa and, you know, in whispers that we can't really define in any way. It's all cards on the table now, and it's almost like it's being rubbed in our faces. Right.

How do you battle? So when you have something that's the state power of the United States, which is utterly enormous, combined with the corporate power. I mean, I always viewed government in some ways as hopefully a check on corporate power. But if it's a lubricant, what does that turn into? And again, I apologize. I just realized.

You went right from strong cow to lubricant. Well, it's obviously something very dangerous because what we're seeing here is the total release of all democratic constraint and all pretense to social norms that used to constrain these people. They're totally unfettered in their access to power and in their sense of what is okay to do with that power.

But were we kidding ourselves in some ways? You know, I saw a gentleman who was trying to become the new DNC chairman, General Martin, I think his name was. And he had said about money in politics, oh, yeah, we're going to get all that money out. You know, we're going to have our good billionaires, but we're not going to take any money from the bad billionaire. And it reminded me, I once had Nancy Pelosi on, and she said money corrupts in politics. What about the money Democrats raise? Oh, no, that doesn't corrupt us. There's this sense that...

Oh, no, it's only those actors that are bad. I mean, the oligarchs gained trillions during the Biden presidency. Yeah. So are we kidding ourselves that this wasn't in place, just not maybe as stated as clearly? I would want to move away from individualistic explanations of, like, good billionaires and bad billionaires and talk about, like...

What do we as a society say? We're not we're not gonna let you get away with that because Historically that's been the only thing that's constrained the really rich if you go all the way back to the Medici in the 1400s They weren't necessarily good people but they were the richest people in Europe and the reason we have the Renaissance and all of its great works of art is because their society wouldn't let them get away with just sitting on their hordes of wealth and

and enjoying it for their own benefit. They had to do something for their society. Does that mean we're allowing ourselves to be bought off? Is the idea being like, look, you guys amass what you need to amass at the top. You pull the strings you want to, you know, pull. We need two parks. Like, what... How...

And this gets to a larger conversation about labor and capital. How does American labor tap into that money stream? Because that money stream is built on the backs of American labor, yet they don't have access to it. What if we allow them their excess, but rather than philanthropy, is there a way to attach, to make American labor also a shareholder in that?

Yes, but you could say it's the hard way, so to speak. One of the wealth managers I spoke to in the course of studying offshore finance over 17 years, he was a historian. And I mean, he trained as a historian at one of the Oxbridge schools in the UK. And he said... It's one of the finest historian institutes. And he was very candid about his role in making...

rich people richer at the expense of the rest of us. And he said, well, once that ball gets rolling, it becomes quite difficult to stop it short of like revolutions or mass general strikes. And I think historically, that's what we've seen. We're at levels of wealth inequality unseen since the Gilded Age.

And, you know, what happened then? Well, we had a world war. We had a pandemic. And then we had the rise of fascism. And in between then, we had a lot of labor action in the U.S. So if labor unions are able to muster enough power to stand up to some of these oligarchs, they could be a force for good.

It's so dispiriting to hear that same message for labor of like, you guys just need to get together and get better lobbyists. Like, and there is something here that seems almost more difficult, which is this rise of populism mirroring this gilded age. You know, fascism was not blended with the gilded age. The industrial age was. And so I don't know that we've

We've seen this before. And I hesitate to say that, but it does seem unusual. And you know what's really kind of surprising to me about this is that what's really needed here is a way for people to coalesce and organize themselves to stand up to these individual accumulations of power in the hands of the broligarchs. But the law is not on our side. The law is basically now saying corporations are people, money is speech, and so how do you...

Well, I hate to see someone who studied this for so long to you go like you know what's terrible to me and I'm like what.

Sorry. You study this. Well, as you correctly point out, where does the wealth actually come from? It comes from labor. So if labor gets together and says, we're not going to stand for this anymore, or if consumers get together and say, we're not going to stand for this anymore, there are way more of us than there are of them. The problem is that the weird twist in the wonderful world of the internet and social media is that rather than giving us a means to coalesce and come together,

It's divided us into these little bubbles or camps that are at war with one another. Which I'm guessing now is maybe the overt strategy. Yeah. Because that's in many ways how they generate the income because that the overt strategy of the algorithm is to conflict and outrage.

Just last week, there was a scholarly journal article published by some political scientists in the Netherlands that looked at who generates the most misinformation on social media. And they found it was really asymmetric. It's almost all coming from right-wing populists. And it's not an accident. That's their strategy. Holy shit. You know, for a second there, I thought you were going to say me. No.

Made me really nervous. Thank you so much for this. Offshore is the book. It's available now. Brooke Harrington, we're going to take a quick break. Before we go, I'm going to check in with your host for the rest of the week, Mr. Ronnie Chang. Ronnie! Ronnie!

What do you got for the rest of the week, my friend? John, before we lean into the Trump years, I'm going to spend this week fondly remembering the incredible four years America had under Joe Biden, a president of faith, compassion, and courage. You know he's out of office and can't give out any more pardons, right? You know that. Oh, I see.

I see. Well, then I'll be spending this week talking about the Biden crime family and how only President Trump has the courage to take them down. Thank you so much. Ronnie Chang, everybody. Great break. Here it is. You're welcome to join. I just want to say you're a younger, far more beautiful audience that I just spoke to.

And I want to keep it off the record. Miss Cheney is a disaster. She's a crying lunatic and crying, crying Adam Kinzinger. He's a super crying. I never saw the guy not crying. I talked about inflation too, but you know, how many times can you say that an apple has doubled in cost? Used to get into a stagecoach, now you get into a helicopter. Times change. I mean, they got like 60, 70 pounds of drug and they go as fast as you can walk. They go, "Bip, bip, bip." And I would attack a karate champion

Get slightly rebutted. And I think this was a better speech than the one I made upstairs, okay? I think this was better, J.D.