We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode College Admissions and Race, Student Debt Ruling, Actors Union Negotiations

College Admissions and Race, Student Debt Ruling, Actors Union Negotiations

2023/6/30
logo of podcast Up First

Up First

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
J
Jane Fonda
新闻播报员
Topics
新闻播报员: 最高法院裁定大学招生不能考虑种族因素,这将使大学更难实现多元化。法院否决了哈佛大学和北卡罗来纳大学的招生政策,认为这些政策违反了宪法中关于种族平等的要求。首席大法官约翰·罗伯茨认为,大学招生政策即使出发点良好,但未能遵守宪法对种族问题的严格限制,但学校可以考虑申请者如何描述种族对其生活的影响。加州大学的例子表明,要恢复多元化招生,需要耗费数十年的时间和数亿美元的资金。最高法院的裁决给高中生带来了焦虑,他们担心自己的身份不再重要。大学可以通过改进招生论文、增加招生和扩大经济援助来提高多元化,但研究表明,没有什么比创造种族多元化的机构更有效了。 Sea partial Perry shes: 大学可以考虑申请者如何描述种族对其生活的影响,但不能再使用配额制或单纯基于种族身份的评分系统。 Angel of press: 最高法院的裁决将使大学实现多元化招生变得更加困难和昂贵。 Ron Mitchell: 最高法院的裁决给高中生带来了焦虑,他们担心自己的身份不再重要。 Virginia Foxx: 拜登总统的学生贷款减免计划是非法的,因为总统越俎代庖,擅自使用纳税人的钱来偿还学生贷款。 Persis Yu: 现有的案例法表明,原告们没有起诉的资格。 Fran Drescher: SAG-AFTRA正在进行富有成效的谈判,致力于解决对会员最重要的关键问题,并争取达成具有里程碑意义的协议。 Jane Fonda: 如果演员们加入编剧罢工,好莱坞将陷入停摆。 新闻播报员: 最高法院即将就拜登总统的联邦学生贷款减免计划的合法性做出裁决,该计划影响着数千万美国人。政府认为拜登的学生贷款减免计划是合法的,因为《英雄法案》赋予教育部长在紧急情况下修改或豁免学生贷款规定的权力。最高法院需要确定原告是否能够证明他们受到了学生贷款减免计划的损害,从而拥有起诉的资格。拜登的学生贷款减免计划可能影响多达4300万人,其中多达2000万人可能获得贷款减免,但批评者认为该计划代价高昂,并且对大学生不公平。好莱坞演员工会SAG-AFTRA可能在今晚与制片方谈判破裂后罢工。如果无法达成协议或延长最后期限,演员们将加入编剧的罢工行列。演员们关心的关键问题包括从流媒体平台获得更好的剩余报酬以及防止人工智能取代演员的工作。尽管谈判似乎接近达成协议,但许多演员担心谈判代表立场不够坚定,并已签署信函敦促不要接受不利的协议。上次好莱坞演员大罢工是在1960年,演员们与编剧一起争取在电视上播放电影的剩余报酬,现在他们要求从流媒体平台获得剩余报酬。

Deep Dive

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

How are universities answering a supreme court ruling on their admission?

The court said lead schools may not use races of factor. The schools say that will link diversity harder, but they still .

want to achieve IT la afforded that Steven skip, and this is a first from N. P. R. news. The supreme court also has opinions on paying for college is about a rule on whether president bite and student loan forgiveness gram can be ahead. Plants will want to cancel the plan to cancel debts for tens of millions of people.

Also, union negotiations for hollywood .

actors are.

Also, line be extended. Well, actors join hollywood writers on the picket line. Stay tuned. I'll give you the news. You need to start day.

This message comes from wise the APP for doing things in other currencies, send spender, receive money internationally, and always get the real time mid d market exchange rate with no hidden fees, download the wise APP today or visit. Why is that come decent sea apply. This message comes from C B C. Podcasts, personally short sited, is a podcast series that attempts to explain what vision loss feels like by expLoring how IT sounds and does an intimate look at accessibility and its personal impacts. Listen now, this message .

comes from a lady mafia. This is the story of the glorified loan shark swimming the monkey waters of vast money and shady deals did SHE blow ten million dollars of other people's money. Lady mafia is available for listening now on the bench, wherever you get your podcasts.

we have some preliminary answers to have. A supreme court ruling affects university admissions.

Yeah, the court majority rejected elaborate policies at harvard and the university of north CarOlina. Both elite ite schools considered race as one factor to decide on which students get in. The ruling says that vio oates, the constitution requirement for equal treatment regardless of race. The center said the constitution promises equality, and that was all right for schools to act on that promise.

And a little warning is here. Good morning.

Good morning. First.

how did the court explained its ruling?

So chief justice john Roberts wrote the majority opinion, and he said, however well intention, the policies at un, sy and harvard were they failed to use race within the narrow confines of what the constitution allows. He did leave the door open, writing that schools could consider an applications discussion of how race affected his or her life. I talked about this with sea partial Perry shes, a senior legal fellow at the heritage foundation, who was encouraged by the decision.

The court is clear that universities can consider an applicant discussion of that how race affected their individual lives, but we will no longer see individuals checking a box or being subjected to a college or university's quota system.

So universities don't really have quotas, but harvard was using a point system to rate students identities.

And this is the thing the court says is wrong. Now, if you had an individual experience with race that you want to talk about in your application, you can do that, but you no longer get credit, the court says, for being member of a group. So called what our colleagues is an admissions s profession saying about all that.

So even though was expected, it's a major blow to colleges who are committed to diverse campuses. I talk with Angel of press. He leads the national association of college admission counseling.

Today's decision is going to make IT a lot harder um and a lot more expensive for institutions of higher education and admission officers to bring a diverse class.

He points to the university of california there IT took decades a complete admissions redesign in hundreds of millions of dollars to try and get those diversity numbers back up after the state's affirmative action ban in the late one thousand nine hundred nineties. He says most states, most colleges don't have that kind of money or political will.

This is an interesting point because you're telling me the universities in response to this and not saying we're abandoning diversity, they're saying we're going to try to get diversity in some other way. Does this affect every university?

Well, IT is a nationwide ruling, but most schools are open access in community college. Lots of no public four year schools. Only a small portion about two hundred have highly selective admissions where this decision would apply.

But what happens at a lead institution matters. They're tekewani to power in america. Take the spring core justices. Currently, eight of the nine attended last school at harvard or year.

What does this mean for high school students who might be applying to college?

You I spoke with on a Mitchell. He's a long time high school council in washington, D. C, he's been working with the students already to kind of reframe their essays to touch on their lived experience. But he says, this whole thing has caused a lot of aniele.

So students are asking the questions like bow, does my identity not matter anymore? Does that not mean that we are only going to be relegated to h bc. use? And those are the thoughtful ful responses, at least that the other kind of responses that where here and is op, I guess they really don't want us to go to college. You know where they always say the colleges .

and for everyone, hc, historical black colleges, universities. What can colleagues do within the law? Now to be improve diversity? Well.

we're gona see a focus on essays, increased recruitment, expanded financial ID. But over and over again, research shows, you know, nothing is as effective as creating a racially diverse and body as .

considering race. Thanks so much. 一般。

Now i'll talk about college tuition because as soon as today, the supreme court will release one of its most anticipated opinions.

one that has tens of millions of americans on the other other seat, the court will decide whether to preserve or hey, bit. President bidens planned to a raise billions of dollars in federal student.

On that N P S, correct? N has been covering that moved by the by administration morning.

What are the art court is basically grappling with two big legal questions here. First is president bindings. That plan legal is IT constitutional, the administration argues, obviously, yes, because of a long known as the heroes ac that passed not that long after the attacks of nine eleven.

And IT gave the education secretary really broad power to modify or wave student loan rules. Those are the verbs in the law. In times of emergency, the administration argues emergency like the pandemic. Now the plans, conservative opponents argue, a racing some four hundred billion dollars and student loans isn't just modifying the rules. Here's the republican chairwoman of the house education committee, Virginia fox, several weeks ago.

What the president has done is take on the role of congress to appropriate money, from the taxpayers to people who willingly took on a debt. I think what he has done is totally illegal.

And fox says, if congress really wanted to erase all these student loans, IT would have done so itself. A IT is worth noting, Steve, that during oral arguments, the court conservative majority seem to agree.

okay, seem to agree on that point. But what was the other point that could design this case?

yes. So the other question they're trying to answer may actually be the by administrations only hope here. And that is, can any of these plaintives prove they'd be hurt by dead cancellation because, see, the court won't even rule on a case if the plant tips don't have what's called standing to sue in the first place.

So in one of these cases, he was brought by a pair of barbers, one of whom doesn't qualify for relief because of the kind of loans they have. The other qualifies for ten thousand dollars and cancellation. But once to qualify for more, the other case that was brought by six conservative states, including the braska, and they've tried to show harm by saying a major student loan serving company, the bar was no as mohel would lose business and that would hurt the status .

in missouri. okay. That doesn't sound like they absolutely have found someone who is directly harmed.

No, because the company mohel isn't even a plant of in the case. Here's purchase, you sheat the student barrow protection center.

There really is no way that any of these planets have standing under existing case law. This is the reason why we saw the republican appointed discord level judge throughout the case in nebraska by then.

What's not clear, Steve, is how the court's conserve majority is going to weigh the standing issues against their clear concerns about the plan's legality.

How many people and how much money would be affected here?

Yeah, I mean, as many as forty three million people could be affected here. As many as twenty million could have their that's erased. Then again, critics of the plan say, look, this could cost four hundred billion dollars, and IT would privilege americans who went to college over those who couldn't or chose not to.

N, P. R. education. Corresponding return.

Thanks is always your welcome, Steve.

We have a hollywood Cliff hanger. Next, actors have a strike deadline tonight.

The union, known by the acronym sag after, has been negotiating with the alliance of motion picture and television producers for several weeks. But if they don't reach an agreement or extend the deadline, the actors would walk out as the writers already did.

Eh, mentally, the barco was covering this hayter.

Hey, Steve.

so how close birthday to a deal? Well.

you know, early this week, things seem to be looking good. Sag, after president friend dress, you may remember her from the TV showed the nani well, SHE sent a video message. Have negotiations to members.

Well, Frankly, it's very confidential what's going on in there. But I just want to assure you that we are having an extremely productive negotiations that are laser focus on all of the crucial issues you told us are most important to you. And we're standing strong and we're going to achieve a seminal deal.

Love that familiar voice, but please go on yeah know .

some of those crucial issues SHE was talking about include getting Better residuals from hit shows on the streaming platforms. And also a big concern for the actors is getting protected from the use of artificial intelligence. Actors are afraid their images and their work is going to be replaced .

by A I A miro of one of the concerns in the writers strike. But if they seemed close on these things, why might they still strike?

Well, apparently many of the members were worried that the negotiators weren't standing firm. If, you know, nearly all of them, ninety eight percent, had already voted to authorize a strike if needed. And after friend dressers message went out, actors sent them a letter urging them not to settle for a deal and saying they were ready to strike.

That was signed by three hundred members, including allister's mayor strip, Jennifer Lawrence and quinton brinson. And by the following day, the list group to more than a thousand performance, including amy polar, walking phoenix, jamey kurtis and pedro pasa. And um this is the most curious part of Steve friend.

Russia often signed the letter that was addressed to herself and other sag after the leaders, you know. So we'll have to see if they call a strike. And you know, for full transparency, I do have to say that many of us here and P R, our members of sag after, but we're not covered under the TV theatrical contract. So we would not be expected to go on strike if one is called.

Nevertheless, if the actors go on strike, they would join the writers on strike. What's that been like in recent days?

Yeah, well, you have have gone to so many of the picket lines these past two months. And i've met a lot of actors who've been protesting in solidarity with writers, some of them famous, some of them background extras, and all of them told me that they're ready to strike. Yesterday I was outside netflix where striking writers got a special visit from lilly tomlin and jane funda. Here's what funda told the crowd about the studios .

and the streamers. 我 只好, if the actors go out with the writers, this industry will be shut down.

So I should mention sty that the last time there was a dull strike in hollywood IT was nineteen sixty. The screen actors skilled hadn't yet merged with after. And that was LED by then actor ronal ragon, long before he was president. And the actors join with the writers to demand they get paid residuals if movies were played on T, V. Now they're asking for residuals from the streamers.

Okay, some things change to stay the same mentally. Thanks so much. Thank you.

And there's metal bargo. Our culture corresponded in s Angels. And that's at first for this friday, june thirty, on Steve and .

skip and lily a 4。 A first is produced by David west, linz, y tody, monty corona and on a parrels, our editors are Steve drummed, bilal, katia and Alice wolff's, our technical director.

Is that common with engineering support? Sr, or where every gets your podcast?

This message comes from Better help this holiday season, do something for a special person in your life. You give yourself the gift of Better mental health, Better help online therapy connection with a qualified therapist via phone, video or live chat is convenient and affordable, and can be done from the comfort of your own home.

Having someone to talk to is truly a gift, especially during the holidays visit, Better helped dot come slash N P, R to get ten percent off your first month. This message comes from wise, the APP for doing things in other currencies, send spender, receive money internationally, and always get the real time mid market exchange rate with no hidden fees. Download the wise APP today or visit wise decent sea. Apply the indicator is a .

podcast where daily economic news is about what matters to you.

Workers have been feeling the steam of inflation.

so as a new administration promises action on the cost of living, taxes and home Prices, the S M, five hundred biggest post election day Spike ever. Follow all the big changes and what they mean for you.

make amErica affordable again.

Listen to the indicator, the daily economics podcast for npr.