We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
SCOTUS Rulings, Trump Megabill, Israeli PM Denies IDF Deliberately Fired on Gazans
2025/6/28
Up First
A
Ayesha Roscoe
37年后被宣告无罪的本杰明·斯宾塞，揭示了美国司法系统中的严重错误定罪问题。
C
Camila Dominovsky
E
Elena Moore
N
Nadia
N
Nina Totenberg
P
Pierre Zadil Al-Shulji
S
Scott Simon
Nina Totenberg: 最高法院最近就两项重要议题做出了裁决。首先，法院限制了联邦法院发布全国性禁令的权力，这意味着特朗普总统的行政命令将更难被全面阻止。虽然所有下级法院法官都认为特朗普限制出生公民权的行政命令违宪，但最高法院并未直接处理这一问题。相反，法院裁定，下级法院的裁决现在只能保护提起诉讼的个人或团体，使得挑战总统行政命令的难度大大增加。不过，各州仍可寻求全国性禁令，集体诉讼也可作为替代方案。其次，最高法院裁定公立学校系统必须为家长提供退出条款，允许学生因课程内容与宗教信仰冲突而退出相关课程。学校董事会对如何实施这一裁决表示担忧，因为满足各种退出要求可能会非常困难且扰乱课堂秩序。学校最初允许家长选择退出某些课程，但后来取消了该计划，因为它变得不切实际。法院的裁决并未提供明确的实施指导，导致学校董事会感到困惑。
Deep Dive
The Supreme Court ruled to limit universal injunctions, impacting challenges to executive orders. While not addressing the constitutionality of birthright citizenship, the court's decision makes challenging executive orders more difficult. The court also mandated opt-out provisions for religious objections in schools, causing concern for implementation.
- Supreme Court limits nationwide injunctions.
- Birthright citizenship question remains unaddressed.
- Public schools must provide religious opt-outs for course material.
Shownotes Transcript