The Death of Jennifer Fairgate | A Locked-Door Mystery
49:58 Share

Did anyone take the time to really teach you about money when you were a kid? If you're like me, that answer is no. Fortunately, with Acorns Early, your kids can learn about the value of money now and avoid the pitfalls of financial illiteracy. Acorns Early is a smart money app and debit card for kids that helps them learn the value of money. Acorns Early's Chores Tracker teaches kids that hard work pays off.

pays off. Just set up chores in the app, set a payment amount and tick them off as they finish. Acorns Early lets parents pay allowances automatically. Kids can then spend what they earn with their very own customizable debit card. Plus, parents can keep track of where and when their kids are spending. This app will give your kids that true sense of independence they've been longing for while also teaching them valuable money skills.

Ready to help your kids learn the value of money? Just head to acornsearly.com slash crimehub or download the Acorns Early app to get started. Sign up now and your first month is on us. TNC Supply. Monthly subscription fee starting from $5 per month unless canceled. A spy. A victim of foul play. A staged suicide.

The locked-door mystery of Jennifer Fairgate has it all: high-profile intrigue, suspected covert ops, and an endless trail of unanswered questions. What began as an unassuming hotel stay soon became one of Scandinavia's most perplexing cold cases. Who was Jennifer Fairgate, and what secrets did she carry to her death in room 2805? It all began on May 31st, 1995.

The setting: one of Norway's most luxurious hotels. Located in Oslo, the sleek and modern Radisson Blue Plaza, a woman enters alone, checking in under the name Jennifer Fairgate. She appears completely ordinary. She moves through the lobby with a neutral expression, under no duress. She has a slender build, well-kept short brown hair, blue eyes, and nondescript facial features.

She is wearing business attire, has little luggage, and claims to be traveling with a companion, Lois Fairgate. Her check-in raises no immediate alarms. Fairgate is assigned room 2805. She enters the room at 10:44 pm. During her brief stay, she keeps to herself, engaging minimally with staff or anyone else in the hotel.

In fact, she becomes increasingly unreachable, and after a scheduled credit card payment goes unanswered on June 3rd, the hotel's worries grow when she doesn't pick up her phone. A staff member is dispatched to a room to check on Farragate, and this is where things go off the rails. As the staff member approaches room 2805 at 7:50 PM, a single gunshot rings out from within. The staff member panics and authorities are contacted.

Upon arrival an hour later, investigators find the door to Farragate's room is double locked from the inside. The detail suggests a suicide, and they initially latch on to that. The scene they find upon entering appears to confirm this hypothesis. Farragate is lying lifeless on the bed with a gunshot wound to her head and a 9mm Browning pistol in her hand. Clearly, she has taken her own life. At least, that's the assumption at first glance.

There is no sign of forced entry, no apparent struggle, just the body of the woman lying lifeless on the bed. But as inspectors dig deeper, the details don't add up. There is no suicide note, no sign of distress. Something about the scene seems staged, and as the investigation unfolds, Fairgate's identity quickly unravels.

And so begins the locked-door mystery with its first deadbolt secured: Who is Jennifer Fairgate? During their initial inquiry, investigators found an alarming absence of personal identification. It was soon discovered that Fairgate had checked in under a false name.

The Plaza Hotel's policy did not require guests to show identification upon check-in, as the Radisson primarily catered to business travelers and VIPs, and its procedures were relatively relaxed, emphasizing discretion over stringent ID verification. This allowed guests to register with minimal oversight, making it possible for someone to check in under a false name without arousing suspicion.

The lack of ID left investigators with no reliable leads about Fairgate's background or intentions. At the time, the hotel staff didn't realize the identity she provided was fraudulent, but authorities confirmed the information written on the hotel's intake form was incorrect. In fact, the woman had misspelled "Fairgate" as "Her-gate" twice. The misspelling raised immediate questions: who was she really?

And why was she providing false information? This was the first in a series of red flags that would continue to confound investigators. Not only was her identity falsified, but Fairgate's hotel registration form was filled with inconsistencies. She listed a town in Belgium called Verlaine as her home. But the postal code she gave didn't match.

While Verlaine is a real place in eastern Wallonia, about 20 kilometers from Liege, the details on her form didn't align with any real addresses. She entered "Rue de la Stede 148" as her street address, which doesn't exist, and listed a company called "Service" as her employer, suspiciously close to the Belgian firm Cerberus, though no link could be confirmed.

The phone number she provided was also incongruent. It included an area code for another region. And while the local number did exist in Belgium, it didn't match up with Verlaine or any plausible contact for her. The plot thickened when police found that the woman attempted to call two almost identical phone numbers in Belgium from her hotel room, only one digit apart. Yet, these numbers led nowhere.

In response, Interpol and the telecom company Belgacom provided a list of numbers similar to those she dialed. But nothing turned up. At the time, Belgian law enforcement had separate police forces, each with its own protocols. Missing person cases often suffered from delayed investigations and communication gaps between agencies.

It wasn't until the tragic 1990s case of Marc Dutroux that Europe revisited missing person protocols. But in the early 90s, when Fairgate's case unfolded, these procedural updates were still years away, leaving investigators with few leads and many unanswered questions about her identity and connections in Belgium.

Despite multiple investigations and inquiries into her background, authorities turned up nothing. There were no missing persons reports that matched her description, and her fingerprints didn't match any known records in the police database. The only connection to her identity was a name: Jennifer Fairgate. Yet, no one knew whether that was her real name or an alias.

The name "Fairgate" and her reported Belgian hometown led investigators to a dead end. Belgian officials confirmed they had no record of a person by her name under either spelling: "Fairgate" or "Fergate", or fitting her description. Forensic techniques at the time found her DNA and fingerprints untraceable, indicating she may have had resources or affiliations that helped her evade standard identification systems.

No one at the hotel seemed to know anything about her life or her reason for visiting Oslo. No records existed of her prior whereabouts, and there was no indication of any personal connections in the city. All that was known was that she spoke English and German, according to staff. Some staff members assumed she was a flight attendant, based on her minimal luggage and dark wardrobe, typical of this line of work.

Her physical appearance is also guesswork due to the limited description available to the public and the scant details surrounding her identity. The only photos available to the public are crime scene photos, forensic sketches, and artistic interpretations. However, based on witness accounts, a few key characteristics have been described.

Fairgate was estimated to be around 30 years old at the time of her death, though she reported upon check-in that she was 21, and recent DNA analysis found her age to be 24. She was 5'2" and 148 pounds with light brown or auburn hair. It was cut short and appeared well-kept. Her facial features were often described as generic. She was reportedly dressed in business attire upon arrival.

though not much detail about the specifics of her clothing was made public. Her wardrobe was apparently high-end, however, and she had expensive gold and porcelain dental work done, likely completed in the United States or in a Western European country like Germany, Switzerland, or the Netherlands. 24 hours before her death, she had also tipped room service 50 kroner, a handsome tip at the time.

about five times the average. Such details made her stand out as someone who had a certain level of affluence and sophistication. Fairgate's behavior during her brief stay also rang alarm bells for hotel staff, at least in retrospect. For starters, her lack of luggage and personal effects were unusual. Her room was booked for three nights.

The maid and a trainee, who came to clean the room at 12:50 pm on June 1st, noticed that Fairgate's belongings were sparse and the room was not lived in. The bed appeared to not have been slept in and the extra duvet, provided for Fairgate's guest, was not used. There were no personal effects, like toiletries or other typical items you might expect from a guest staying for several days.

There was no wallet, no passport, no evidence of your average jet-setter's life. Her clothing too was peculiar. Only tops were found, no skirts or trousers. The only visible label on Fairgate's clothing was inside a grey blazer found hanging in her hotel room closet. The tag bore the brand name of the German fashion label, Rene Lazare, and couldn't have been removed without damaging the jacket's lining.

Further investigation traced this item to a sale in Germany. Resting on an armchair, there was a turquoise-green travel bag by Travelite, another German company, linking two key items in her possession to Germany. The bag held a black silk top, black pantyhose, and three beige bras, items that seemed minimal yet purposefully chosen. These clues suggested a German connection.

though how they fit into the mystery of Fairgate's identity remains unclear. Aside from the shoes she was wearing at the time of her death, no other pairs were found in Fairgate's hotel room. When hotel steward Vigdis Valo cleaned the room on Thursday, she noticed a stylish pair of shoes under the luggage shelf. However, after seeing photographs of the shoes the victim was wearing when she was found dead, Valo was certain they weren't the same pair she had seen.

A cotton sweater and a sleek, long black leather jacket were placed on the luggage shelf, while the closet also contained a sleeveless blouse and a longer trench coat. Aside from the gray sweater, all tags had been removed from her garments, suggesting an effort to erase any trace of herself. This, along with the fact that her credit card had been prepaid and left no paper trail, compounded the sense of identity erasure.

there was no indication of where she came from or where she was going. Even more unsettling was the fact that no one ever saw Fairgate eat or even leave her room. However, several drinks and a bag of chips had been consumed from the hotel minibar. Hotel staff noted that she ordered food from room service, consisting of bratwurst and potato salad.

A room service attendant had delivered the food to her room the night before her death, and according to the undigested food in her stomach, the meal had been eaten more than 24 hours later than expected. This suggests that Farragate had been in the room longer than her records showed. However, no one had actively tried to contact her or verify her presence until her payment issue prompted action.

Some people argue this delay in action created a gap in the timeline, giving potential accomplices or other parties an opportunity to set the scene. Everything pointed to a seemingly deliberate attempt to conceal even the smallest details. Farragate remained an isolated figure, a woman who wanted to remain invisible. In that case, who or what was she isolating from?

As the details continued to unfold, the answer to that question became hazier than ever. Creating truly outstanding retail experiences is tough, especially with multiple stores, teams of staff, fulfillment centers, separate workflows. It's a lot. But with Shopify Point of Sale, you can do it all without complexity.

Shopify POS brings your in-store and online operations together in one powerful system. Whether you're running a single storefront or managing a thousand, it's designed to make shopping effortless for your customers, offering options like online purchases, in-store pickups, or convenient deliveries. For your team, Shopify POS is more than a tool. It's a confidence booster that helps them close sales with ease.

Plus, you can build lasting customer loyalty through personalized experiences and harness first-party data to supercharge your marketing. The numbers speak for themselves. A 22% better cost of ownership and an average sales boost of 8.9%. Ready to simplify operations, delight your customers, and grow your business? Head to shopify.com slash crimehub.

all lowercase, and learn how to create the best retail experiences without complexity. Shopify.com slash crimehub.

Huge thanks to Acorns for sponsoring today's episode. Every new year, we set all sorts of big goals, but only 8% of people will stick with their resolutions all year long. But with Acorns, you can lock in years and years of healthy money habits in just five minutes. Acorns makes it easy to start automatically saving and investing, so your money has a chance to grow for you, your kids, and your retirement. You don't need to be an expert.

Acorns will recommend a diversified portfolio that fits you and your money goals. You don't need to be rich. Acorns lets you invest with the spare money you've got right now. You can start with $5 or even just your spare change.

It's simple, stress-free, and honestly, one of the smartest financial moves you can make. Start small, dream big, and let Acorns guide you to a better financial future. Head to acorns.com slash crimehub or download the Acorns app

to start saving and investing for your future today. Paid non-client endorsement. Compensation provides incentive to positively promote Acorns. Investing involves risk. Acorns Advisors LLC and SEC Registered Investment Advisor. View important disclosures at acorns.com slash crimehub. No surveillance footage of Jennifer Farragate's arrival at the Oslo Plaza Hotel has been found or publicly confirmed by authorities.

Her movements inside the hotel remain largely unaccounted for, but it's believed that upon arrival, Fairgate made her way to room 2805 and disappeared behind its door at 10:44 PM on Wednesday, May 31st. As per her keycard records, this solitary arrival suggested that Fairgate was alone in the city. So, who and where was her supposed companion, Lois Fairgate?

According to her check-in records, Fairgate had indicated that she was traveling with Lois, but whether or not anyone saw this person remains unclear. Sasha Renee Anonson, the receptionist who checked Fairgate Inn, vaguely recalls the victim checking in alone and receiving keycards. However, Evie Tudemjertsen, another receptionist, recalls seeing Fairgate at the counter with a dark-haired man.

Gjertsen, who described him as a bit taller and older, around 35-40 years old. She still stands by this detail, though she is uncertain if she saw him during check-in or later in the evening. Gjertsen also remembers the man possibly exchanging foreign currency, though this memory is hazy. Initially, both sides of the bed in Fairgate's room had been fitted with duvets, as per the additional guest.

But by the time housekeeping arrived the next day, one had been folded and stored away, with the bed made for a single person. Oddly, when Fairgate's body was later discovered, the bed had once again been arranged with two duvets, one on each side. Men's cologne was also discovered in the bathroom.

But no luggage was found in the room belonging to Lois, and no other hotel guests or staff members could verify his existence. So, was this Lois just a tall tale? And if so, why tell it? Some suggest that Lois Fairgate may have been part of an elaborate ruse, or that the name was fabricated entirely. Hotel records are scarce, and much of the information regarding guest movements was lost or destroyed over the years.

The mysterious and possibly made-up companion fueled many theories about Fargate's background. Could Lois have been yet another false identity created to muddy Fargate's true purpose? Was Lois part of a cover story? Perhaps to throw a potential investigation off of the scent? Some have gone so far as to suggest that the companion may have been a figment of Fargate's imagination. The absence of any trace of Lois raises additional questions.

If he wasn't real, what was Farragate's true purpose in Oslo? The unexplained nature and seeming non-existence of Lois has remained one of the most baffling elements of the case. As if these details weren't suspicious enough, the forensic evidence was equally puzzling. Farragate's body was discovered with a gunshot wound to her head. The gun was found in her hand with seven additional rounds of bullets inside.

But several details about the scene didn't add up to a straightforward suicide. Multiple anomalies appeared to cast doubt on this theory. The gun used in the incident was untraceable. The serial numbers had been removed with acid. Investigators could not determine where it had come from or to whom it belonged to. Was it hers? Or had it been planted?

Not only was the victim holding the gun oddly, but no fingerprints could be lifted from the firearm, including from the trigger, which would have been unusual if Fairgate had indeed shot herself. The absence of fingerprints suggested that someone else may have handled the weapon, or that it had been wiped clean of any identifying prints. Furthermore, there was no blood splatter on the weapon or on Fairgate's hands.

It was everywhere else: on the pillow, the bed, the table, the wall, the phone, even on the ceiling, but not on her hands or the gun. Perhaps the most significant forensic anomaly was the absence of gunpowder residue. In typical suicide cases involving firearms, investigators would expect to find traces of gunpowder on the person's hands. However, this was not the case.

Gunpowder residue was absent, despite the fact that Farragate was found holding the gun. This could imply that the gun was placed in her hand after her death, or that the shot was fired from a distance, making it even harder to accept the suicide theory. These odd forensic details raised the possibility that Farragate had not taken her own life at all. Was her death a carefully staged scene? Was she murdered?

The time between the gunshot and the arrival of hotel staff has also been a point of controversy. According to hotel records, a security guard checked her room when a "Do Not Disturb" sign had been on the door for over two days and her bill had not been settled. The lack of payment resulted in a message being sent by the front desk at 2:19 pm on June 1st via the room's TV screen, asking Fairgate to contact reception.

It wasn't until 8:55 AM the following morning that the message was acknowledged. When Fargate again failed to show up, another reminder went out on June 2nd at 8:57 PM, which was responded to with a simple "OK" eight minutes later. On Saturday evening, June 3rd, receptionist Evi Tudum-Jertsen grew concerned after noticing the guest's lack of response, despite her acknowledging the messages.

At 7:36 pm, the receptionist sent one final message, which was once again acknowledged. But when she checked, no one had come to the desk. It was then that she called for a security guard to check the room. This guard knocked and reported hearing a single gunshot around 7:50 pm. He reported the situation to his manager, leading to a delayed entry into the room by security and police.

It took approximately 15 minutes for staff to respond to the sound. The actions taken by security staff in this case indicate that security and management responded in stages, leaving the door to her room double-locked until police arrived. Standard procedure in many hotels would involve a quicker response or immediate call to law enforcement, especially following the sound of gunfire.

The delay in response has left some question whether this gap might have allowed time for the scene to be staged or for evidence to be altered. Upon arrival, investigators found a window ajar in the room. This in itself wasn't altogether suspicious. The room was 28 floors up and there was no balcony, so the window was unlikely a means of escape. But the detail didn't go unnoticed.

No one spotted anyone leaving through the hotel either. Other oddities include ammunition found in the room, the clothing Fairgate was wearing, the lack of CCTV footage, and irregularities in her hotel keycard logs. A black leather case found with Fairgate's belongings had an unusual detail: a tiny metallic buffalo emblem.

This logo is the hallmark of Braun Bufell, a German brand known for high-end leather products. Yet another German link. This small clue may connect the case to specific locations or sellers, potentially narrowing down its origin. The case held ammo cartridges and may have also carried the gun.

Fairgate was found wearing a bra, a long blouse, stockings, long silk underwear, a thigh-length cotton jacket, and Italian-made high-heeled shoes. All items were black. She also wore a gold ring on her right middle finger and a Citizen Aqualand diving watch on her left wrist. Despite extensive CCTV coverage in most hotels, there is an absence of footage showing any of Fairgate's movements.

The hotel was equipped with a security system, but the investigation revealed there was no surveillance footage checked for the period of her stay. This is a point of contention in the case. While witnesses claimed Fairgate didn't appear to leave her room, keycard data suggests that she left the room for more than 20 hours at one point. Upon her arrival on Wednesday night, she was given two keycards, which could indicate she expected a second guest.

Initially booked to stay until Friday, she extended her reservation that morning to remain until Sunday, receiving another set of keycards. The hotel's electronic lock records show that her keycards were only used five times during her stay. Curiously, the system only tracked when the door was opened to enter the room, not when it was opened from the inside for someone to leave. The timeline of the keycard usage is perplexing.

on Thursday morning around 8:34 a.m. Her keycard registered an entry into the room, suggesting she might have returned from breakfast. Her room was last accessed that day around noon, after which hotel staff found the room unoccupied during a cleaning at around 1 p.m. The next recorded entry was the following morning, Friday, around 8:50 a.m., meaning the room had likely remained empty for nearly a full day.

The gaps in her movement and limited sightings contribute to the unresolved questions about her intentions and who, if anyone, might have accompanied her.

Unsolved Mysteries co-creator, Terry Muir, said that during research for the episode covering Jennifer Fairgate's case, some details were left out due to time constraints, including a few that add to the mystery. Muir suggests that the fact that the room was found double locked was less definitive than it sounds. She clarified, "They actually did do a test of how somebody could have killed her and locked the door behind them."

I guess it's just not that complicated. Although there was no balcony access, it turns out that locking the door after an exit was feasible for someone familiar with the mechanism. Another seemingly minor but curious detail overlooked in the episode is the state of the bathroom. Evidence suggested that someone had recently showered. There was also a bottle of men's cologne present: "Hungaro po la ombuan."

hinting at the possibility that someone else might have been in the room before or after her death. Adding to this theory, a newspaper was found in her room labeled with the room number 2816 instead of 2805, where she was registered. An unidentified thumbprint on the newspaper bag has yet to be matched to anyone.

Unfortunately, a 2010 hotel office move led to the disposal of older registration cards, meaning there was no way to determine who was staying in room 2816 during that time. This detail has fueled speculation that room 2816 may hold key evidence or that its guest could have had a connection to Fairgate's death. Yet the lack of hotel records leaves these questions unanswered.

No official suspects were identified, but several theories and individuals associated with the hotel at the time have been discussed in unofficial investigations. The account and actions of security on the scene became a focus of scrutiny because of a few inconsistencies that emerged, particularly regarding the exact timeline and protocols followed after the gunshot was reported.

Although security acted promptly in response to the sound, there was speculation about whether standard procedures for securing the scene were strictly followed. The handling of the investigation after the fact, such as the immediate ruling of suicide without further detailed questioning, or examination of potential security lapses, fueled suspicions.

Despite these factors, no public information indicates that any single person on the hotel's security staff was suspected of direct involvement in Fairgate's death. Their role was primarily questioned due to the circumstances of the initial response and the limited investigation that followed, rather than any overt suspicious behavior.

Their involvement appears to have been procedural, and no evidence has come to light implicating security staff in any wrongdoing. However, one mysterious character in the case sat right across the hallway and is known only through records as "Mr. F." Mr. F. was the guest staying opposite Fairgate's room. Little is known about him, apart from the fact that he was Belgian.

He became a person of interest due to unusual details regarding his recollection of his checkout process. According to a journalist from Norwegian newspaper VG, Mr. F was approached by hotel staff about Fairgate's death. Oddly, he reported that hotel employees asked him if he had heard anything suspicious in the neighboring room in relation to her death. However, Mr. F remembered this interaction occurring during his checkout.

which was the day before Fairgate died, before the gunshot was heard. If Mr. F is to be believed, that would mean he was asked about Fairgate's death while she was still alive. This peculiar timing raises questions either about hotel staff or about Mr. F himself. If Mr. F is to be believed, the scenario suggests that the hotel anticipated a disturbance in Fairgate's room.

indicating possible foreknowledge or hidden connections. What did they know about her situation before she died? And why was Mr. F questioned prematurely? In response to this inconsistency, Mr. F allegedly said, "I don't know anything about that. I just remember they asked me. That's all I know." If Mr. F's account is false, then suspicion falls on him.

Despite these strange details, Mr. F was never officially considered a suspect and he was not further investigated. The lack of a follow-up left many questions about his knowledge of the events and his experience of the days in question. Without further information, he remains yet another deadbolt in this locked door mystery. The investigation into Jennifer Fairgate's death was marked by confusion, uncertainty, and a lack of leads.

Investigators faced significant obstacles, including the absence of concrete clues, the lack of any identifiable witnesses, and deliberate efforts to erase Fairgate's past, either by Fairgate herself or by those who wanted her gone, or both. Attempts to gather further information about her identity, including international inquiries, have yielded little of note.

DNA analysis in 2016 suggested she was likely from East Germany, but no other breakthroughs have been made. Despite the earlier discrepancies detailed, the authorities at the time still leaned toward the conclusion of suicide, partially because of the lack of any immediate signs of foul play.

this initial ruling would remain largely unchallenged for many years, as the case seemed to be dismissed as an isolated, tragic event with no further need for investigation. In part, this is likely due to the personal and political ramifications that might arise from reopening a case involving an unidentified foreigner whose death appeared to be self-inflicted.

But as the investigation never reached a definitive conclusion, in recent years, it has attracted renewed public interest. The mystery never quite faded from public memory. In the years that followed, the case was discussed intermittently in the media. In particular, it gained traction among true crime enthusiasts and internet sleuths, who were drawn to the strange details and unanswered questions surrounding the victim's life and death.

As one might expect, theories were plentiful with the Fargate case, each more fantastical than the next. The possibilities range from espionage and assassination to psychological explanations involving mental health and suicide, but no one theory offers definitive answers.

Some believe the initial conclusion of suicide was correct. Though there were few clues to suggest mental health struggles, proponents of this theory suggest that Farragate may have been experiencing a personal crisis, which led her to take her own life. Those who support this theory point to the possibility that Farragate was in emotional distress at the time of her death.

By most accounts, she was alone at the hotel and showed no visible connections to anyone or anything in her life. Some theorists speculate that she could have been running away from a personal issue, such as a failed relationship, job loss, or some other life crisis. The act of checking into a hotel with minimal belongings and no personal interaction with others might suggest someone trying to escape their reality.

if only for a short time. However, the staged nature of the room contradicts the typical pattern seen in suicides. When people take their own lives, especially in cases of depression or emotional distress, there is often a more personal touch to the scene, notes or some indication of the emotional state leading to the act.

But in Farragate's case, there was nothing personal left behind, as if someone had gone to great lengths to leave it that way. This level of premeditation is at odds with the typical signs of a suicide, raising doubts about whether this theory holds any weight. One of the most widely discussed theories is that Farragate may have been an intelligence agent involved in espionage. This theory stems from several key factors surrounding the case.

including her lack of identification, the mysterious nature of her background, and the untraceable firearm that was found with her body. The setting played into this as well. Oslo's Radisson Blu Plaza Hotel was frequented by international figures, diplomats, and business people, adding weight to the theory that the location might have been a meeting point for covert operations.

Supporters of the espionage theory argue that these details point to a mission gone wrong. Beargate's falsified personal information, along with the absence of any personal belongings, suggests that she was deliberately trying to erase her identity, which is the norm in intelligence circles when engaging in undercover operations.

Her minimalistic behavior, from staying in a high-end but inconspicuous hotel to traveling with little luggage, further aligns with the kind of low-profile existence maintained by spies. Could Farragate have been part of a botched mission? Those who believe so speculate that the room was a rendezvous point, and her death was either the result of a mission or an assassination orchestrated by another party within the intelligence community.

Moreover, the way Fairgate handled the firearm, that is, if she did shoot herself, was likened by some to military or intelligence training. The clean shooting technique and lack of gunpowder residue led some to propose that Fairgate might have been trained in weapons handling, suggesting that her death was not simply a result of poor judgment, but rather part of a larger and more complex situation.

A former head of Norwegian intelligence, Ola Kaldager, suggested this possibility, stating that it was not uncommon for intelligence agencies to leave such deaths unreported. Her identity could have been intentionally obscured as part of a covert operation. Despite the compelling nature of these factors, there is no concrete evidence leaking Farragate to any intelligence agency or covert activity, leaving this theory speculative at best.

Another theory gaining traction is that Fairgate was murdered, and her death was carefully staged to resemble a suicide. Supporters of this theory point to the multiple inconsistencies and anomalies at the scene of the crime, which suggest foul play rather than self-inflicted harm. If Fairgate was indeed involved in some form of criminal activity, it's possible that her death was the result of an assassination.

carried out to silence her or prevent her from revealing sensitive information. Another element of the assassination theory involves the enigmatic figure of Lois Fairgate. Some suggest that Lois may have been involved in the assassination, either as an accomplice or as the person who orchestrated the events leading up to Fairgate's death. Lois's existence was only ever corroborated by one witness.

His presence wasn't verified by any evidence, but his name appeared on the check-in record, which indicates that Fairgate had some connection to him. If he did exist, it is possible that Lois was working with Fairgate in a clandestine capacity, either as a fellow agent or someone with an interest in her demise. The absence of Lois raises suspicions that he could have been the person responsible, or at the very least, someone with knowledge of what happened.

However, as with the espionage theory, there is no evidence to support the assassination theory, apart from the fact that it shares some uncanny similarities with two other mysterious cases in Norway involving unidentified individuals: the Cambo man and the Isdal woman. These cases each have striking elements in common: missing identification, cut-out clothing tags, possible international connections, and suspected espionage.

And to add to the intrigue, the cases span three decades. In 1987, an unidentified man known as the Cambo Man was found dead near railway tracks in South Norway. Like Fairgate, he had no identification on him, and brand labels on his clothing had been removed. DNA testing hinted at a possible link to Belgium, much like the Belgian origins suspected in Fairgate's case.

This connection across borders again raises questions about whether these individuals may have been undercover. An even more unsettling parallel can be found in the infamous 1970 case of the Isdal Woman. Her burned body was discovered in Norway's remote ice valley, known as Isdalinn, with evidence that she had ingested poison. Like Fairgate and the Cambo Man, her clothing tags were removed to hinder identification.

Investigators found various wigs, cryptic notes, and passports in her luggage, which supported a possible spy theory. Further investigation suggested she had connections in Belgium and other parts of Europe, and her suspected ties to intelligence networks gave rise to speculation that she might have been involved in espionage. These cases span 35 years, from 1970 to 1995.

In all three cases, the individuals' identities and backgrounds are unknown. The cutout clothing tags, lack of identification, and hints at connections to Belgium suggest a pattern that goes beyond coincidence. The parallels are uncanny, but further evidence has yet to conclusively link the cases.

Other theories propose that Fairgate was a high-end escort or involved in a major drug operation. But again, little concrete evidence supports such claims. The police even looked into whether or not she was the missing wife of Italian mobster, Leoluca Bagarella. But this was a shot in the dark and was disproved.

Retired policeman Tom Olson told journalist Lars Wegner in 2017: "We looked into many groups and social backgrounds but found nothing. Lots of police units were involved. If she was sent to kill someone, who was it? We searched but never found any answers. She went to such lengths to not be identified." In the absence of hard evidence or definitive conclusions, speculation continues to lead to double-locked doors.

What's clear is that this case of unanswered questions and conflicting details remains one of the most perplexing mysteries of the 1990s and is unlikely to be solved anytime soon. Until more concrete evidence is found, the increasingly fantastical theories will continue to generate interest in Farragate's tragic death.

In the early 2000s, media outlets began revisiting the case, prompting journalists to take another look at the evidence and the possibilities that had been overlooked. Equipped with access to the internet and social media platforms, the general public began to re-examine the case as well. Websites and forums dedicated to solving mysteries started to discuss Fairgate's death in great detail.

It was at this point that a new generation of amateur investigators began to dig deeper into the evidence, sharing information and attempting to piece together the few fragmented details available. The online community's fascination with the case was stoked by several unresolved questions. Who was Jennifer Fairgate? Why was she traveling under a fake name? What was the significance of her mysterious companion, Louis Fairgate? Was the crime scene staged?

By the late 2010s, this influx of renewed interest led to the case becoming the focus of various documentaries, feeding public curiosity. Many of the online sleuths and investigative journalists involved in this renewed wave of interest were convinced that the original investigation had missed something crucial, either due to the lack of resources or a failure to follow up on promising leads.

The reignited obsession with Faragate has also created a sense of frustration, as no new breakthroughs have been made. Despite public outcry, the official investigation into her death remains closed. Norwegian police have no plans to reopen the case, and no new evidence has been found that would justify further action. While the official stance remains that Faragate's death was a suicide, there are many who believe that the truth is still hidden.

Some argue that the authorities were too hasty in their conclusion, while others suggest that someone may be intentionally preventing the discovery of the truth. Whatever the case, the Jennifer Fairgate mystery remains one of the more widely discussed unsolved cases in Scandinavia. Who was Jennifer Fairgate? What did she carry with her to her death in room 2805? And why did she choose to disappear? Or did someone else make that choice for her?

Her death is not just a cold case. It is a complex thriller that's kept the true crime world on the edge of its seat. With no definitive answers, the Deadbolts are locked shut.