cover of episode Post Mortem | The Footprint

Post Mortem | The Footprint

2025/5/20
logo of podcast 48 Hours

48 Hours

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
E
Erin Moriarty
Topics
Erin Moriarty: 作为一名48小时的记者,我很高兴能参与讨论珍妮·蔡尔兹谋杀案,这个案件对法医学爱好者来说很棒。虽然找到了匹配的DNA,也不一定能轻易破案,因为现场可能存在很多DNA。即使DNA证据确凿,也只能证明某人曾经在场,无法确定具体时间。在1993年,DNA技术还处于早期阶段,虽然收集了DNA和血腥脚印,但当时的DNA与任何人都不匹配,嫌疑人有不在场证明,脚印也不属于他,导致案件陷入僵局。在2015年,DNA技术有了显著进步,虽然公寓里有很多DNA,但警方发现了一个特殊的未知DNA样本,不仅在卧室里,还在浴室的毛巾上。调查人员认为凶手可能在浴室清理过,因此浴室的DNA样本非常重要,这个DNA属于Jerry Westrom,但当时只能确定Jerry曾在公寓里出现过。仅凭DNA无法确定其何时被留下。在这个案件中,血腥脚印变得至关重要。本案实际上是一个关于血腥脚印的案件,检方认为在受害者血液中留下脚印的人,要么是案发时在场,要么是案发后立即在场。如果脚印与公寓里发现的DNA属于同一个人,那么这个人很可能就是凶手。金州杀手案启发了全国各地的调查人员,他们甚至聘请了同一位家谱学家。Barbara Rae Venter擅长构建家族树,并通过家谱网站找到了两名嫌疑人。Barbara Rae Venter将DNA上传到家谱网站,构建家族树,找到了两名嫌疑人,他们是兄弟。选择Jerry Westrom是因为他的DNA显示他有棕色的眼睛,而且他有招嫖的历史,这使他成为嫌疑人。Jerry Westrom此时只是一个嫌疑人,不能仅凭Barbara Rae Venter的发现提出指控。必须获得Jerry的真实DNA样本,并与犯罪现场的DNA进行比对,才能将案件提交法院。口腔拭子是最好的DNA样本来源。FBI特工跟踪Jerry到威斯康星州的冰球比赛,试图获取他的DNA样本。特工们跟踪Jerry到冰球比赛,看到他用纸巾擦嘴,并将纸巾带回实验室进行检测。法医科学家Andrea Fea的检测结果表明,纸巾上的DNA与犯罪现场的DNA样本匹配。获得DNA样本后,他们逮捕了Jerry。Jeannie的家人对嫌疑人被捕感到非常惊讶,因为案件已经过去很久了。Jeannie的姐姐Cindy住在Isanti,那里也是Jerry Westrom的住所,Jerry经营着一家商店和加油站,大家都认识他。Jerry Westrom没有暴力史,这与Jeannie被残忍杀害的事实形成对比,让Cindy和她的母亲感到震惊。我们无法判断一个人的情绪,因为我们不了解他们内心的想法。1993年记录的血腥脚印成为了关键证据,专家对这些脚印进行了分析和比较。州立专家认为,有四个脚印适合进行比较,并证明这些脚印是Jerry Westrom留下的。州立专家的证词非常不利,因为Jerry的DNA在公寓里被发现,现在血腥脚印也属于他。辩方聘请的专家Alicia McCarthy认为,只有一个脚印E2适合进行比较。Alicia McCarthy认为,州立专家对其他三个脚印的分析是不正确的,只有E2可以进行分析和比较。Alicia McCarthy也认为,左脚大脚趾下方的一个小区域的脚印是Jerry Westrom留下的。当辩方得知Alicia McCarthy也认为其中一个脚印属于Jerry Westrom时,他们解雇了她,但州立要求她出庭作证。Alicia McCarthy的出庭作证对陪审团来说非常重要。DNA证据和脚印证据都指向Jerry Westrom,他在接受审讯时没有表现出太多情绪。辩方被允许提出Arthur Gray作为嫌疑人,但他有不在场证明。在楼梯间发现了John Eswine的血迹,但他的DNA没有在公寓里被发现,他的脚与脚印的比较也没有得出结论。James Luther Carlton因杀害Jodie Dover而被定罪,Jodie Dover的谋杀案中也发现了血腥脚印,但陪审团没有听到任何关于Carlton或John S. Wine的信息。明尼苏达州最高法院撤销了Westrom的二级谋杀罪,但维持了一级谋杀罪。根据明尼苏达州的裁决,被告可以被判犯有被指控的罪行或包括在内的罪行,但不能同时被判犯有两者。谋杀的每一个较低程度都是包括在内的罪行,因此二级谋杀罪是一个包括在内的罪行。这个故事最令人沮丧的部分是我们不知道为什么会发生,因为他没有说话,也没有作证,而且没有动机。Jeannie的母亲和姐姐相信他杀害了Jeannie,但她们仍然沉浸在悲痛中。

Deep Dive

Chapters
The episode delves into the murder of Jeannie Childs in 1993, a case that remained cold for over two decades. Advances in investigative genetic genealogy, combined with the analysis of bloody footprints found at the scene, finally led to a breakthrough.
  • Jeannie Childs was stabbed over 60 times in her apartment.
  • The case went unsolved for over two decades.
  • Advances in investigative genetic genealogy led to the identification of a suspect.
  • Bloody footprints at the crime scene were crucial in the investigation.

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

It's a new season, but it's always truck season at your local Chevy dealer. And right now is the perfect time to find your own. If you're a truck person, then you get it. Hauling, towing, reliability, Chevy trucks deliver. Check out ChevyDriveChicago.com. They've got all the info you need to research your future Chevy truck.

We'll be right back.

If an EV is on your mind, then your local Chevy dealer is ready to blow you away. They're ready to put you behind the wheel for a test drive and show you all the latest technology in these top-tier electric SUVs. Seriously, go check them out. Whatever you're looking for, head to ChevyDriveChicago.com today. Learn more, find your local dealer, and get ready to drive away happy. Because you deserve a Chevy.

Summer's here and Nordstrom has everything you need for your best dress season ever. From beach days and weddings to weekend getaways and your everyday wardrobe. Discover stylish options under $100 from tons of your favorite brands like Mango, Skims, Princess Polly and Madewell. It's easy too with free shipping and free returns. In-store order pickup and more. Shop today in stores online at nordstrom.com or download the Nordstrom app.

Welcome back to Postmortem. I'm your host, Anne-Marie Green, and I'm joined by 48 Hours correspondent Erin Moriarty. We're going to be discussing the murder of 35-year-old Jeannie Childs. She was stabbed over 60 times in her Minnesota high-rise apartment in 1993. Her case went unsolved for over two decades until advances in investigative genetic genealogy led authorities...

to arrest a local businessman and father. His name is Jerry Westrom. Erin, thanks again for joining us. Oh, I'm really grateful to be here because this is one of those stories. People who love forensics love this story. We want to remind everyone, of course, if you haven't listened to this hour, head on over to your feed. You'll find this episode of 48 Hours right above this one. Go listen and then come on back and we can talk about it.

When I started watching this, the case reminded me of actually the first 48 hours I ever did. Several years ago, it was the case of Angie Dodge, a teenager, an 18-year-old who was killed in her brand new apartment. And the case went unsolved for many, many years until they used genetic genealogy to track down her killer. It was kind of newish then. This is a very similar case. But the thing about this case is...

You know, you think you find the DNA, you find the match, it's a home run. But in this case, in the apartment, there was a lot of DNA. So not necessarily a home run.

Now, what's so interesting is I think jurors sometimes think that it's a slam dunk when there is DNA that has been obtained through genetic genealogy. But the truth is DNA, if it is collected and tested properly, it can show that somebody was there, but it can't tell you

when they were there. And in this case, this case, as you said, Anne-Marie, happened in 1993. That was when DNA was in its infancy, at least being used as a investigative tool. And so they did collect DNA and they collected those bloody footprints that are just so important in this case. But the DNA didn't match anyone back then. They did have a person of interest. She was living with a boyfriend, Arthur Gray.

But he had an alibi. He was out of town that weekend. And they took those unknown bloody footprints and compared them to Arthur Gray and said that they did not belong to him. So the case kind of went cold.

And then in 2015, just about two decades later, you know, there were so many advances in DNA technology that they did more tests. And I thought this was really interesting. As you pointed out, Emery, there was a lot of DNA there in that apartment. Yeah. According to police reports, Jeannie was a sex worker and there had been

men in that apartment. But what was interesting is they found one unknown profile, the specific that was not just in the bedroom, but also in the bathroom on a towel. And, uh,

And because investigators believe that the killer might have cleaned up in the bathroom, that was significant to them. And so that is the DNA that belonged to Jerry Westrom. But all they had at that point, really, is the idea that Jerry had been in that apartment at some point. Right. Because just because DNA is found, you can't tell when that DNA was deposited, right?

You cannot. And that's why in this case, those bloody footprints became so important. Normally it would be a genetic genealogy case. This was a bloody footprint case. And the prosecution said...

whoever left their footprints in her blood had to be either there at the time of the murder or right afterwards. And so if those footprints match the person whose DNA was found in that apartment, that was a pretty good indication that that person could be the killer.

Now, I think at this point, one of the most, I guess, famous investigations that was solved because of genetic genealogy was the case of the Golden State Killer, Joseph James D'Angelo. Were the investigators inspired by that case? And is that why they kind of went down that route?

You know, that case inspired investigators all over the country. Yes. And they were inspired even to use the same genealogist, Barbara Rae Venter. I had met her on a story I was doing for Sunday Morning. And she's such an interesting woman.

She was a patent lawyer, but she also had a Ph.D. in biology. And she loved to do because this woman has this amazing brain. Her hobby was to do these family trees. And that's how she got involved in the Golden State Killer case. So now she does these cases and she took that.

that I mentioned that had been found both in the bedroom and the bathroom, and she uploaded it to the genealogy sites, including MyHeritage.com. And she was able to build out a family tree and came up with two suspects who happened to be brothers.

And then she picked Jerry because the DNA profile indicated that it belonged to someone with brown eyes. And Jerry Westrom had brown eyes. But more important probably, I think, for investigators was Jerry Westrom had a history of soliciting sex workers. And so that made him a suspect in this case.

And remember, it's just a piece of evidence at this point. You know, at this point, Jerry Westrom now is just a suspect. Right. Because they can't bring any charges based on what Barbara Rae Venter finds out. She gives them these names and then she has no idea what happens after that until they call her and say whether they've arrested a person or not. So, you know, what they have to do at that point is they've got to get...

a real DNA sample from that person and then see if that matches the unknown DNA in the crime scene. They have to do that or they can't take this case to court. So therein lies the challenge. They have to somehow get a DNA sample from Jerry. And I thought it was really interesting in the hour

how they talked about, you know, a mouth sample, a saliva sample is better than anything else. And this is the first time I actually considered why they want mouth swabs, why they always look for, you know, something a suspect may have put in their mouth, a drink. But they go, the FBI agents in 2019, they go all the way to Wisconsin to track them down at a hockey game.

Why do they have to go that far? Well, so, yes, you're right. He's living just right outside Minneapolis in Icentee. But he is a devoted hockey dad. And I think they believed that if they followed him to Wisconsin, where he was going with his family to see his daughter play hockey, you know, you eat.

You're out at a hockey game. So you've got these two investigators who are following him, like right behind. But they don't want him to know because what if they're wrong? They don't want to be seen. They're staying in the same hotel as Jerry and his wife are staying. I mean, they even went... It just is so interesting. After he checked out of his room, they went into his room. Now, how are they going to know that it was...

his DNA that he left on something, but they did just in case they could find something that they thought connected just to him. So it takes time and they're frustrated. So they finally follow him to this game. According to Agent Bokers, they follow him to this game and they finally see him wipe his mouth with a napkin and they bring it back to the lab. And according to Andrea Fea, who was the forensic scientist who tested it,

it matched the unknown DNA sample from the crime scene. So they've got more than a suspect. They've got someone they're about to charge. Wow. And so they get the DNA sample and they make an arrest. How did Jeannie's family react to hearing about who the suspect was? Well,

With a lot of surprise. Number one, you know, it had been so long. This was February 2019. Jeannie had been killed in 1993. They did not tell them that they were looking at someone. So this came out of the blue. But I think more important, especially for Jeannie's sister, Cindy,

They live in Isanti, and that's where Jerry Westrom lives. Jerry ran Westrom's Corner, which had a shop and a gas station, and everybody went there. Her kids knew his kids. I mean, it was shocking to Jeannie's sister. And I should point out, I...

think this is very important. Yes, he might have had brown eyes. Yes, he may have had a history of soliciting sex workers, but he did not have a history of violence. And if you remember, Anne-Marie, Jeannie was killed brutally. And so I think it came as a big shock to Cindy and her mom.

Did you know that parents rank financial literacy as the number one most difficult life skill to teach? Meet Greenlight, the debit card and money app for families. With Greenlight, you can send money to kids quickly, set up chores, automate allowance, and keep an eye on your kids' spending with real-time notifications. Kids learn to earn, save, and spend wisely, and parents can rest easy knowing their kids are learning about money with guardrails in place. Try Greenlight risk-free today at greenlight.com slash Spotify.

Now streaming. Hi again. TV's quirkiest crime solver. I'm Elspeth Tassioni. I work with the police. Is on the case. I like my outlandish theories with a heavy dose of evidence. And ready to go toe-to-toe with a cavalcade of guest stars. Are you saying that this is now a murder investigation? It's starting to look that way. Don't miss a moment of the critically acclaimed hit Elspeth. All episodes now streaming on Paramount Plus and return CBS Fall. That sounds like fun. Obviously murder's not fun.

Welcome back. In February of 2019, Jerry Westrom was arrested when he was 52 years old and he was charged with the murder of Jeannie Childs. Now, police questioned him for 11 minutes before he asked for an attorney. I want to play a clip of that interview that didn't make it into the show. Do you know we have your DNA? I assume so. Okay. So...

What was he like during that interrogation?

I mean, he doesn't seem to be upset. You know, why isn't he asking why he's there? Or not saying what we all think he would say. I didn't do anything like that. I would say so, considering the circumstances. But when we spoke with our legal consultant, Julie Rendelman, she does point out that you really can't judge somebody's affect. You know, we don't really know what's going on through his head. Mm-hmm.

So this case also had a really sort of interesting piece of evidence that you talked about a little bit earlier, these bloody footprints. And it was the focus for investigators. And at first I thought, oh, what a unique and perfect piece of evidence. But then afterwards I thought, but how do you what do you compare that to? There's no footprint database like there is for fingerprints. So how do you even use this evidence?

That was so interesting, Annemarie. This was the first one for me, as it seemed to be for the investigators. But, you know, remember these were actually recorded back in 1993. They were photographed. There were seven that they had labeled. So what was interesting is we had two experts. So we had the expert for the state, and then we had an expert that had been hired by the defense. And the expert for the state was,

said that four of those were suitable for comparison. And he decided, and he testified as such, that four of those prints

to Jerry Westrom, that Jerry Westrom was the one who left them there. That is so damaging, as you can imagine, because we know his DNA is in that apartment. But now it looks like that these bloody prints also belong to him. But then you have the expert that had been hired by the defense. And she is an expert who teaches in Waterville, Maine, Alicia McCarthy. And

And she did the same work as the state expert. But she said that she only found one of those prints, E2, it was labeled E2, as suitable for comparison. She says that the state expert was not right about those other three, that you could not

analyzed and compared those other three, just E2. But what matters in this case is she also found that the print, which is right below the big toe of the left foot, just this small area, she says was left by Jerry Westrom. So as you can imagine, Anne-Marie, when the defense found out that she was a green, at least on that one part that it belonged to Jerry Westrom,

The defense dropped her, did not want her to testify for them, but the state said, please testify for us. She did. And I think that was very significant for the jury. So what you have is you do have the DNA, the genetic genealogy DNA that seems to place them in that apartment. And you have the area right below the big toe of the left foot that seems to also place Jerry Westrom.

in her blood on the day she was murdered. And then you have that interview where he doesn't seem to show a lot of emotion. But that's, that really kind of describes the case against Jerry Westrom. In August of 2022, Jerry Westrom went on trial for Jeannie Child's murder. Now, the jury heard from a defense witness who told police that she saw Jeannie Child with a blonde man wearing a trench coat on the day she was murdered. But

I'm wondering if there were any other suspects that the jury did not get a chance to hear about. So I had mentioned Arthur Gray. The judge did allow the defense to raise Arthur Gray. He was living in the apartment with...

Jeannie. They did have a history of abuse. She had filed a police report and his hair was found on her hand, but he had an alibi. But there were some really interesting other possible people of interest. So they found blood right in the stairwell that belonged to a guy named John Eswine and

And so they interviewed John Eswa. And I should point out, none of his DNA was found in the apartment, but his blood was found in the stairwell. And they interview him and he's a very friendly guy. But when they compared his feet to those unknown bloody footprints that came out inconclusive, the jury never heard any of that. And a more interesting person is James Luther Carlton.

So James Luther Carlton was convicted of killing a woman a year later, Jodie Dover, in her apartment. And here's why it's eerily similar. In Jodie Dover's murder story,

There were also bloody footprints found, and that's so unusual. And one of those footprints was found to belong to Carlton. We do not know whether Carlton was at all investigated or...

talked to at the time in this case. But he's now serving a life sentence for Jody Dover's murder. So the jury, again, did not hear anything about Carlton or John S. Wine.

And so ultimately, the jury does find Jerry Westrom guilty of murder in the first and second degrees. And then on September 9th, 2022, he's sentenced to life in prison. In 2024, the Minnesota Supreme Court reversed Westrom's second degree conviction, but it upheld the first degree murder conviction. I'm just curious about why they reversed the second degree conviction.

Well, every state is different. You know, even whether you have a first degree or second degree murder is different by state by state. And I'm just going to read to you what the ruling is, because I thought this was interesting, that according to the ruling in the state of Minnesota, a defendant may be convicted of either the crime charge, which was murder or an included offense, but not both.

And so every lesser degree of murder is an included offense. So they decided that that second degree murder was an included offense. So he could be convicted of first degree, but not both, not the included offense. So that's why they reversed it. But but he's you know, he's remaining in prison on first degree. Right. Right. The punishment is is the punishment. And he's going to be behind bars for a really long time.

I think, I know for me, the most frustrating part of this story, though, is that we don't get to hear a why because he's not talking and he didn't testify. And there was no motive. They did not present a motive. You know, there was a, in one of her stories,

Date books. Yeah, there was a Jerry, but, you know, nobody knows who that Jerry was, but otherwise nobody remembers him with her. Jerry just didn't come up. But no, no motive in this case. And he didn't take the stand.

So even though, I mean, we really don't know what happened in that apartment or why it happened, the fact that he was convicted after 25 odd years, does the family feel like they've received closure, that there's justice? Or are there so many still unanswered questions that there can never be closure?

I mean, they both have said this to me, Jeannie's mom and her sister. They they do trust the system. They believe that he did kill Jeannie. I don't think her mom will ever stop grieving. She read to us this beautiful letter that she had written her daughter once about.

afterwards, so sorry that she couldn't have said all of these things to her daughter before she died. So they are left with their grief, but at least they no longer in their minds have to worry about who it was. They feel they now know who killed Jeannie Childs. Erin, another fascinating story. I learned more about DNA and I thought I knew a lot. I learned about footprints and whether or not they make for good evidence. And thanks for joining us.

You know I love doing this with you, Anne-Marie, and I'm so happy you're now on 48 Hours. This could not be better. Well, thank you. I really, really appreciate it. And I appreciate the listeners having listened to all of our episodes of Postmortem. Postmortem is hosted by me, Anne-Marie Green. Our producer is Annie Cronenberg.

Kiara Norbitz is the coordinating producer. Jamie Benson oversees technical production. Alan Pang and Reginald Bazile are our engineers. Mixing by Pedro Rafael Rosado. Special thanks to 48 Hours executive producer Judy Tigard, Megan Marcus and Ainsley Orsito, who lead the podcasting editorial and operations for CBS, as well as the video editing team for CBS Digital.

And if you like the series Postmortem, please rate and review 48 Hours on Apple Podcasts and follow 48 Hours wherever you get your podcasts. You can also listen ad-free with a 48 Hours plus subscription on Apple Podcasts. Thank you so much for listening. Get ready to laugh until it hurts. You're going to love this. Hey!

Now streaming on Paramount+.

This summer, Pluto TV is exploding with thousands of free movies. Stream hits like Good Burger, Four Brothers, The Wood, Paid in Full, and Beverly Hills Cop all for free. It's Summer of Cinema on Pluto TV. Stream now, pay never.