Israel targets Iran's nuclear sites - extra edition
18:14 Share

This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK. Imagine a place where you're free to wander through winding curves, cut by sacred water through history's memoir in brick and mortar, painted vibrant like the future, where you're free to seek pulsing inspiration in a drum beat, intrinsic, the rhythm that connects street to street and soul to soul. What are you free to be? Find out at visityuricasprings.com.

Okay.

It's USDA certified organic. It has 25% less sugar than the leading kids high protein nutritional shakes. One of the best things that I love about Orgain is that I do not have to force my kids to drink or eat anything from Orgain because the second they tried their shakes, they loved them. Jace loves the fruity cereal flavor. Jolie loves the vanilla and chocolate. So shop Orgain Kids now available at orgain.com and selected retailers.

This is an extra edition of the Global News podcast on the Israeli strikes on Iran from the BBC World Service. I'm Jackie Leonard and at 9 o'clock GMT on Friday the 13th of June, these are the headlines. Israel has attacked Iran with waves of military strikes that it says are targeting Tehran's nuclear programme. Iranian state media say the head of the armed forces and the top commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard have been killed.

And the Israeli military says it's intercepted all of more than 100 drones fired towards its territory by Iran. Israel is calling it Operation Rising Lion, a major attack involving dozens of airstrikes across Iran. In a televised statement, the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the target was Iran's nuclear infrastructure. Last year, Iran fired 300 ballistic missiles at Israel.

Each of these missiles carries a ton of explosives and threatens the lives of hundreds of people. Soon, those missiles could carry a nuclear payload, threatening the lives not of hundreds, but of millions.

Several people linked to Iran's nuclear programme were among those killed. Air traffic has been suspended throughout the region and Israel has declared a state of emergency as it says it expects retaliation. These people in Jerusalem this morning expressed support for the military action. I woke very early and I heard that...

Israeli army attacked Iran and I am very happy for this. We are waiting for this. I bless Israeli army to succeed in this attack. Well, we had no choice. I really feel like this was a last minute decision because...

We had no choice. We can't wait till they do something, then it'll be too late. In Tehran, these people gave their reaction to the Israeli strikes. He's saying they want to take away our nuclear capability. That is unacceptable. So many scientists have worked hard for this. We achieved it ourselves and now they want to take it from us. I think we should

And this man says that as an Iranian, there must be a crushing response, a reciprocal one. How much longer should we live in fear? Well, from Jerusalem, our Middle East regional editor, Sebastian Asher, joins us now. So, Seb, what's actually going on right now? Are these attacks still underway?

We've just been given the all-clear, actually, in the past five minutes. Everyone in Israel had essentially been given an alert saying they should stay in shelter or in a protected space. There were over 100 Iranian drones that were making their way

towards Israel, but it seems that they've all been intercepted and I'm seeing that people are beginning to come out again. There's a big road just near where we are and there are plenty of cars moving up and down that. So for the moment, this looks like it's not going to be a one-day affair but could go on for days and days. But for the moment, the impending attack on

Israel has been averted. So that's something that clearly the Israeli government will take as a major positive.

Israel and Iran trading blows in the Middle East.

Iran was unable to land the kind of blows that Iran was doing last year in response to Israel, and certainly it hasn't done so far here. And what Israel seems to have done to an extent is a kind of dual attack, more wide-ranging than we've seen.

So part of it is on the facilities, the nuclear facilities. We've been hearing about that, about Natanz, etc. We don't know the extent of the damage that's been done, but clearly there were major targets. But also it's about...

senior figures at the heart of the military and nuclear establishment. So the chief of staff of the Iranian army, the head of the Revolutionary Guards, they have both been killed. And at least two top Iranian nuclear scientists have also been killed. That made me think about the strikes that Israel carried out against Hezbollah in the southern suburbs of Beirut in particular last November. Very, very precise, targeted, trying to decapitate

top level of leadership. And why did Israel carry out these attacks now? Well, the reason that has been given is one that Benjamin Netanyahu has been saying literally for decades, that Iran is the major existential threat to Israel. And if it's able to get a nuclear bomb, that is something that is utterly unacceptable for Israel. And it's his duty to defend Israel from that. And

I mean, from him, he was saying that they had new information suggesting that Iran would be able to make nine nuclear bombs within days. We also had a briefing from an Israeli military spokesman who actually raised the figure higher to 15.

which the contrast between those two figures does make you wonder exactly what that information was and why we're hearing two different versions. I think also it needs to be taken into account that the talks between US and Iran on trying to revive the nuclear deal in some form that President Trump had walked away from back in 2018, now he wanted to walk back into it, they were due to enter their sixth round on Sunday. Now, it didn't necessarily look like

There was real momentum, but certainly it was going forward. So again, Mr Netanyahu might have felt this is the moment for him to strike, to essentially stop that...

that process in its tracks.

and civilians were among those who died, including children. But at the moment, that hasn't been independently verified. Kazra Najji of the BBC Persian service joins us now. And Kazra, what is it that you're hearing about what's going on in Iran right now, the impact of the strikes, and in particular, the senior figures killed?

I am in Vienna and I've been covering the IAEA's discussions yesterday about Iran, where they passed a resolution condemning Iran for its non-compliance with its nuclear obligations under the NPT, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. And this attack has happened, this Israeli attack on Iran, has happened just...

hours basically, less than 24 hours after that resolution was passed, which shows you the concern that Israelis might have had after that resolution passed and the Iranian reaction to it, which was basically announcing that they are establishing a third resolution

nuclear enrichment facility in Iran deep on the mountain someplace that they didn't say. But nevertheless, the IAEA here is across the developments into Iran and the IAEA is saying that they are closely monitoring the situation in Iran and they are in contact with their inspectors

I think they have about 100 or 130 inspectors based in Iran. IAEA says they are deeply concerned. They are saying that they can confirm that the Natanz investigation

That's a nuclear enrichment site, which is slightly underground, but not on the mountains. That has been hit. It was one of those places amongst the targets. But the IAEA is saying that so far they have not detected any radiation spread there.

from that site, which is Natanz site. I repeat that that's in central Iran. Agency IAA is saying that they are in contact with the Iranian authorities regarding the radiation levels. And they are saying that the only nuclear power plant that Iran has

...Boucher nuclear power plant. That is in south of the country, along the Persian Gulf. They're saying that that nuclear power plant has not been targeted. They also, interestingly, say that... ...Fordor enrichment nuclear, uranium enrichment site... ...which is deep under mountains, south of Tehran... ...about 100 kilometres south of Tehran, the capital...

has not been targeted, not that the IAEA knows. And they say that that's interesting in a sense that that place is where they are enriching uranium to about 60 percent, close to weapons grade. And that has not been targeted, interestingly. And also, as far as

nuclear conversion site. That's in central Iran again. Isfahan has not been targeted. Nevertheless, Netanyahu is saying that they have targeted the nuclear site, the nuclear weaponization site, and also nuclear scientists.

That was Kazra Najee of BBC Persian. Well, Israeli officials have said that the attack was carried out with complete cooperation with the US, its closest ally. But questions remain as to the extent of their involvement. US President Donald Trump told Fox News reporter Brett Beier that he knew in advance that there would be a strike.

just spoke to uh... of president ron perot one thing you know the president was aware of uh... israel faction of before it it happened other world surprises here uh... but he gave me a quote he said iran cannot have a nuclear bomb well back in negotiating table will see there are several people in leadership in iran that will not be coming back of the u_s_ will defend

will help defend Israel if needed. We got more details from our US State Department correspondent, Tom Bateman. There have been a series of discussions between American and Israeli officials for some time, most notably on Monday, a phone call between President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu that was described as tense afterwards in which this issue was discussed. And the sense very much from that was that President Trump was urging the

the Israeli leader not to do this yet to give his negotiations with the Iranians some more time. But it's now apparent from the Israelis, actually, that they had set this course on Monday itself. That's when the decision over the timing of these strikes was made.

So what is not clear is the degree to which President Trump had given his consent to this happening now. And the issue now is the degree to which the Americans get dragged in. We saw very close coordination between the Americans and also some European countries and even some of those based in the region, some Arab countries, in terms of supporting the Israeli defense against an Iranian counterstrike.

The other issue for the Americans, of course, is that you had the Iranian defence minister yesterday saying if there was a conflict, he said, imposed upon Iran, that they would target US military bases in the region. And I think that's why we've had this very...

stark statement from Secretary of State Marco Rubio within minutes really of the strikes beginning on Tehran saying that Israel took what he calls a unilateral action against Iran we are not involved in these strikes he says going on to say that let me be clear Iran should not target US interests or personnel so a clear warning against Tehran trying to retaliate against the Americans.

That was Tom Bateman. Well, for the wider picture and the implications of this attack, we spoke to defence analyst Jonathan Marcus. One of the reasons the Israelis struck now is that they believe that they had a strategic window of opportunity for two reasons.

Iran's best means of countering Israel were the missile arsenal of Hezbollah, its ally in Lebanon. We know, of course, that throughout recent fighting, Israel has dramatically weakened Hezbollah, so removed to a significant extent Israel.

that element from Iran's armory. Also, of course, Iran wanted to depend on its own air defences, principally Russian and some Chinese-supplied air defences. Now, when the two countries last had an exchange of fire last October, Israel at that point destroyed a significant proportion of Iran's air defences. They also demonstrated that they had the technical capacity to overcome the Russian-supplied systems themselves.

that Iran was using. So that was significant. So I think with both these elements much weakened, Iran's air defences and Hezbollah's own ballistic missile arsenal, the Israeli military and government clearly believed that they had a sort of a strategic window of opportunity, that this was a moment of Iranian weakness that they could exploit. But even given that, how much can the Israeli operation really achieve?

Well, this is a huge question. It's really the key question, I think. And certainly from what we hear, this is an operation that could unfold over a number of days. We're clearly going to have Iranian retaliation, but I think the basic Israeli strikes are going to have to go on for a number of days. Obviously, they will be looking at what damage they believe they have already caused. The

The problem, I think, is does this really significantly destroy Iran's nuclear program? Or is it just a limited setback, which might, of course, paradoxically, encourage Iran to move towards a nuclear weapon even closer?

quicker, that being perhaps the only real deterrent that Tehran may see against future Israeli attack. And the key difficulty, I think, is that the two really crucial facilities, the two enrichment plants, significant elements of them are underground or buried inside a mountain and

so on. And certainly most experts I've spoken to in recent years and months have really believed that, you know, for a total destruction effort, you really required a US role as well, not least because of some of the biggest earth penetrating bombs that are currently in service are only really operated by the Americans and cannot be deployed on the sorts of aircraft that Israel has.

In your assessment, Jonathan, how serious a moment is this? Oh, it's a hugely serious moment. I mean, this is the end of a great arc of rising tensions relating to Iran's nuclear ambitions.

and of course leaves us in a sense on the threshold of a major conflict between Iran and Israel. And what the parameters of that conflict would be, we just don't know. It's likely to involve terror attacks. It's likely to involve all sorts of other different activities rather than just a full-scale confrontation, one against the other.

That was defence analyst Jonathan Marcus. The US knew that the action was being planned, but as our chief international correspondent Lise Doucette explains, the timing was a surprise coming just before a sixth round of nuclear talks due between Iran and the US this weekend. I think this has come as a real surprise for everyone. I'm in Oslo and saw the Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araqchi here.

and the Omani foreign minister, al-Busayli, who has been mediating in these indirect talks between Iran and the United States. All of the focus was on

that there would be talks on Sunday. There was always this idea that, of course, there were other threats, possibly this could go wrong, but there was no sense in which an attack was imminent. And even late last night here, I confirmed with someone in the State Department in Washington that Steve Witkoff would be heading to the region on Sunday. But obviously, with every hour, the tension seemed to escalate.

The dominant feeling was that, well, it'll be after Sunday, and then all of a sudden this has happened, and one cannot exaggerate how dangerous a moment this is in the region. An attack which has not just attacked military and nuclear sites, but has assassinated people.

the two top military commanders, including the commander-in-chief of the IRGC, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, and two of Iran's leading nuclear scientists. That was Lise Doucette. And that's all from us for now, but there will be the regular edition of the Global News podcast later. This edition was mixed by Ben Martin. The producers were Judy Frankel and Stephen Jensen. Our editors, Karen Martin. I'm Jackie Leonard. And until next time, goodbye.

you

Hi, I'm Richard Karn, and you may have seen me on TV talking about the world's number one expandable garden hose. Well, the brand new Pocket Hose Copperhead with Pocket Pivot is here, and it's a total game changer. Old-fashioned hoses get kinks and creases at the spigot, but the Copperhead's Pocket Pivot swivels 360 degrees for full water flow and freedom to water with ease all around your home. When you're all done, this rust-proof anti-burst hose shrinks back down to pocket size for effortless handling and tidy storage.

Plus, your super light and ultra durable pocket hose copperhead is backed with a 10-year warranty. What could be better than that? I'll tell you what, an exciting radio exclusive offer just for you. For a limited time, you can get a free pocket pivot and their 10-pattern sprayer with the purchase of any size copperhead hose. Just text WATER to 64000. That's WATER to 64000 for your two free gifts with purchase. W-A-T-E-R to 64000.

Bye.