We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode SCOTUS Strengthens Conservative War on Education

SCOTUS Strengthens Conservative War on Education

2025/6/30
logo of podcast Strict Scrutiny

Strict Scrutiny

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
Topics
Melissa Murray: 我认为最高法院对LGBTQ+包容性教材的限制是对公共教育的威胁。Alito大法官对儿童读物的解读过于敏感,他似乎认为这些读物会对他的世界观构成威胁。我认为这种观点是荒谬的,而且是对LGBTQ+群体的歧视。 Leah Littman: 我认为Alito大法官的意见是对史密斯案的颠覆。他似乎认为,如果一项法律对宗教信仰构成负担,那么即使该法律是中立的且普遍适用,也应该受到严格审查。我认为这种观点是危险的,因为它可能会导致对宗教自由的滥用。 Kate Shaw: 我认为Sotomayor大法官的异议是对最高法院多数意见的有力反驳。她指出,最高法院实际上是在将家长对课程选择的否决权宪法化,而这些课程选择长期以来一直由地方学校董事会负责。我认为Sotomayor大法官的观点是正确的,而且最高法院的多数意见是对公共教育的严重威胁。

Deep Dive

Shownotes Transcript

Leah, Melissa and Kate roll up their sleeves and unpack last Friday’s huge day at the Court, starting with Mahmoud v. Taylor, the case that tested Sam Alito’s ability to comprehend picture books. They also break down the outcomes of cases involving age verification for adult entertainment and the nondelegation doctrine. If you missed last Friday’s emergency episode on the birthright citizenship case, you can find it here). 

Hosts’ favorite things:

Get tickets for STRICT SCRUTINY LIVE – The Bad Decisions Tour 2025! 

  • 10/4 – Chicago

Learn more: http://crooked.com/events)

Order your copy of Leah's book, Lawless: How the Supreme Court Runs on Conservative Grievance, Fringe Theories, and Bad Vibes)

Follow us on Instagram), Threads), and Bluesky)