Deep Dive
Shownotes Transcript
Elon Musk welcomed a 12th child into the world earlier this year. And last week, we learned Mom is also the mom of his twins and an executive at one of his companies, Neuralink. They met at work.
Neuralink currently has zero job openings in HR, so that relationship must be deemed kosher even if it seems questionable. Meanwhile, a lawsuit from eight of Elon's former employees at another of his companies, SpaceX, accuses him of creating a perversely sexist culture. Elon Musk is running a, quote, animal house. SpaceX has 15 openings in HR.
Recently, Tesla's shareholders, Tesla's head of HR quit in May, had an opportunity to send Elon Musk a message. And they said, great job, guy. Coming up on Today Explained, Teflon Elon.
This week on Property Markets, we speak with Dan Ives, Managing Director and Senior Equity Research Analyst covering tech at Wedbush Securities. We discuss his reactions to Google's earnings, a bull case for Tesla, and why he's so optimistic about the long-term trajectory of the tech industry. I mean, this is a fourth industrial revolution that's playing out. Now, it's going to have white-knuckle moments and speed bumps along the way, but in terms of the underlying growth,
This is just a start. In our opinion, it's 9 p.m. at the AI party and it goes to 4 a.m. You can find that conversation and many others exclusively on the Prof G Markets podcast. It seems like each news cycle is filled with stories of people testing the boundaries of our laws. To help illuminate the complex legal issues shaping our country, Cafe has assembled a team of legal experts for a new podcast called The
You'll hear from former U.S. attorneys Joyce Vance and Barbara McQuaid, legal scholar Rachel Barco, former FBI Special Agent Asher Mangapa, and of course me, Eli Honig, a former prosecutor and CNN senior legal analyst. Listen to commentary from The Council twice a week by subscribing on your favorite podcast app. That's Council, C-O-U-N-S-E-L.
It's Today Explained. I'm Noelle King. Joe Palazzolo is an investigative reporter at The Wall Street Journal. Joe recently wrote a piece about several women who worked at SpaceX and received unusual amounts of attention from CEO Elon Musk. Joe's piece starts with the story of a woman who worked as a SpaceX intern more than a decade ago. Yeah, so in the early 2000s, she's a SpaceX engineering intern.
And she had been introduced to Musk during her internship. And then she kind of boldly sends Musk some pointers for improving the company. And so that outreach leads to a date, which leads to a kiss, and then a sexual relationship, according to what she told friends. So, you know, they bonded over Star Wars. And a year after the internship, so she's now a fresh college graduate, Musk invites her to this exclusive Google event in Sicily.
So then you fast forward a few years and Musk contacts her about a job on his executive staff. It's a high-level role. It's like a really big job for someone a few years removed from college. But the description is kind of amorphous, right? She's to find problems and fix them at SpaceX. And so she's really excited about the job. She moves from New York to L.A. and Musk tries to rekindle their relationship. So she's telling friends that he invites her for drinks and comes on to her and touches her breasts.
One of them recalled her saying that Musk said, "Oh, I'm so bad. I shouldn't be doing this." And so, she's at the company now and Musk continues to lavish her with attention. He's sending her late night texts to come over. Sometimes she goes over there, sometimes she either sleeps through or ignores his invitations. And she tells friends that his behavior is making what's already a pretty tough job even harder. So she's unhappy at SpaceX.
She doesn't have any authority. She's telling friends. She's having trouble getting executives to take our ideas seriously. Sometimes she's hiding out in the bathroom there, right? This is what she's telling friends. And meanwhile, Musk is texting her like a lot. And one of the late night texts that we reviewed and that we recount in the story, you know, he's like, "Come by," you know, this late night text. And when she doesn't respond,
He like quadruple texts her, right? He's like, "Look, it's either me or 6:00 a.m. exercise." And then a little bit later, he's like, "Just finish the Model 3 production call. It's going to be hell." And then, you know, then he's like sending another text like, "Are you coming over?" You know, "If not, I'll probably trank out." He says he's too stressed to sleep naturally. And then when she still hadn't responded, he writes, "Probably best if we don't see each other." In the morning, she responds and is like, you know, "Sorry, I fell asleep."
Then we also have a text exchange in there between her and a friend that takes place right after this invitation and she's contextualizing the invitation.
She's complaining about how she feels like an imposter at the job and how Musk's behavior makes it so much worse. And her friend is like, "Well, if it's a problem, why don't you just chill on hanging out with him?" And then she sends her friend Musk's late night invitation and says, "I think you broke up with me." And then she concludes with, "Why are all the men in my life so weird?"
So she is telling friends that the job isn't going well because he got awkward with Musk. Eventually, she's moved off the executive staff to a role reporting to another engineer. And then in 2019, after less than two years at the company, she leaves. All right. So you reported this in the journal. It is worth knowing that through her lawyers, this woman told a different story of what happened. What is she saying happened? Right. Right.
So our reporting and what she said through her lawyers lines up in a lot of parts, but it also departs in some ways. So as we were reporting the story, we got contacted by lawyers at Clare Locke, which also represents Musk and Tesla. And so they told us they're representing this woman. And in response to our reporting, like our request for comment, they sent us affidavits signed by the women.
What the affidavit said, what the woman said through these affidavits is that, yes, she and Musk had a romantic relationship before she returned to SpaceX in 2017. But then they sort of later qualified that and said that they never had sexual relations. And then she said, you know, in no uncertain terms that there was no romantic relationship between 2017 and 2019 when she worked there as a salaried employee there.
you know she said that nothing elon did towards me during either of my periods of employment spacex was predatory or wrongful in any way she said the that yeah she did go over to his house late at night you know while she worked at spacex but you know it was just to talk and watch anime she said musk did try to rekindle their relationship before her return to spacex and that she rejected his advance
And she said, yeah, there was some initial awkwardness, but we got over it. And then she said that her feelings about her job at SpaceX were, quote, completely unrelated to any romantic or personal interactions with Elon Musk.
So she said the discomfort she described, like in the text to her friend relating to Musk, was about him not having much interest in the role she was filling at SpaceX, not about his attention. This type of relationship that you reported on was not isolated to this woman. Tell me about the other women in your story.
Yeah, so I'll start with the one who leaves the company in the summer of 2013 and she comes back with a lawyer. And in mediation with the company, she alleges that Musk had asked her on multiple occasions to have his babies. Musk has said, you know, over and over that we face an underpopulation crisis.
and he encourages his employees to have kids. Like, that's just something that he does. I can't emphasize this enough. There are not enough people. And I think one of the biggest risks to civilization is the low birth rate and the rapidly declining birth rate. If people don't have more children, civilization is going to crumble. Mark my words. Is this why you have so many children? I'm trying to set a good example.
Her last year at SpaceX had been pretty tense. She and Musk were arguing a lot. She'd been denied a raise. He'd made complaints about her performance. So, you know, like I said, when she leaves the company, she comes back with a lawyer and she makes these allegations about him asking her to have children. The third woman's story also involves Gwen Shotwell, who is SpaceX president and COO.
This one, the woman alleges she's telling her friends and family about this contemporaneously. She's saying that she's retaliated against at SpaceX by Shotwell. And the retaliation, you know, happens after Shotwell accuses this woman of having an affair with Shotwell's husband. So, like, that's kind of a story on its own.
And we describe emails in the story where, you know, Shotwell's husband is telling this woman, "Gwen thinks we're having an affair." And the reason that Gwen thought they were having an affair is because this woman was helping Robert Shotwell, her husband, plan a surprise birthday party for Gwen Shotwell.
And she had a bunch of boxes at her house. The woman did, you know, kind of on her own time. She's working for Shotwell and Musk. And so she's helping plan this party. She has like boxes with bullhorns that Robert had sent over there and, you know, other party stuff. And, you know, she is about to leave town and is arranging for Robert to come pick him up and she gives him a call. And that's what sort of triggers, according to Robert Shotwell, Gwen's suspicion that they were having an affair. So, yeah.
You know, pretty soon after these affair allegations, Shotwell is telling the HR department that she wants this woman gone. After that happens, this woman is now working exclusively for Musk. And according to what she told people at the time, Musk comes up to her at the office, invites her for drinks. And, you know, she goes over there and that initiates a month-long sexual relationship. ♪
It ended pretty badly because she initially thinks that this is something real and pretty soon is telling friends that she's feeling used. As the tensions ratchet up, Musk has his chief of staff, Sam Teller, negotiate an exit agreement for the woman that includes $85,000 for some unpaid work that she had done at Tesla.
And, you know, so she signs this agreement for that money that requires her to, you know, not discuss anything about Moscow or services to him. The question that leaps to the top of my mind is, is this behavior that you documented in your reporting legal?
just unusual and grody? Does it break SpaceX's rules? Is it illegal? Can you sort of put a fine point on where this falls on the spectrum of workplace abuses? Yeah, sure. I mean, for starters, there have been a lot of stories about executives, you know, getting fired, their boards, throwing them out. And sometimes, you
paying financial penalties for having affairs with subordinates. There's a cultural reaction to it. Then there's the SpaceX policy, which really discourages employees from having romantic relationships with people they supervise.
Then there's this broad shift since Me Too where companies are implementing hard bans on supervisor-employee relationships. They do that because there's this inherent power imbalance between the supervisor and the employee, and then it can also cause conflicts of interest in the workplace.
And, you know, obviously sexual harassment is legal under state and federal laws. But there's also kind of this theory of harassment called sexual favoritism that some courts have recognized where, like, if you are an employee and your colleague is having an affair with your boss and is getting preferential treatment as a result of that, you can make a claim of hostile work environment. So there are kind of a lot of...
different lines that this behavior, as alleged, could cross. How have Elon Musk and SpaceX responded to your story? Musk hasn't responded to it at all.
He didn't respond to our request for comment. And Shotwell did respond through SpaceX's public affairs department. And what she said, I'll just quote her right here, "The untruths, mischaracterizations, and revisionist history in your email paint a completely misleading narrative." Then she says, "I continue to be amazed by what this extraordinary group of people are achieving every day, even amidst all the forces acting against us. And Elon is one of the best humans I know."
She also says that all allegations of harassment are investigated and handled appropriately. Why then was it important for you to do this reporting? Why do you feel like this is significant? Well, look, we wanted to see what it was like for a woman working closely with Musk. And as we were doing our reporting, we kept hearing about these examples.
That's not to say that every woman who's worked for Musk has had a bad experience. We talked to people who had good experience. SpaceX is a very mission-focused place. It's full of young, brilliant people. And some of the women that we spoke with said that they felt like they had an experience there, an opportunity that they wouldn't have been able to find elsewhere otherwise.
But as we were reporting and we were talking to people and hearing about these experiences, we thought it was important for people to know, especially prospective employees or investors. You know, I mean, this is information that we thought was important in decision making.
Joe Palazzolo, Wall Street Journal. Joe's story ran on June 11th, and 48 hours later, shareholders in one of Musk's other companies did have the option of using this information in their decision-making. You will not believe what happened next.
Hey, Today Explained listeners. Sue Bird here. And I'm Megan Rapinoe. Women's sports are reaching new heights these days, and there's so much to talk about and so much to explain. You mean, like, why do female athletes make less money on average than male athletes?
Great question. So, Sue and I are launching a podcast where we're going to deep dive into all things sports, and then some. We're calling it A Touch More. Because women's sports is everything. Pop culture, economics, politics, you name it. And there's no better folks than us to talk about what happens on the court or on the field.
and everywhere else too. And we're going to share a little bit about our lives together as well. Not just the cool stuff like Met Galas and All-Star Games, but our day-to-day lives as well. You say that like our day-to-day lives aren't glamorous. True. Whether it's breaking down the biggest games or discussing the latest headlines, we'll be bringing a touch more insight into the world of sports and beyond. Follow A Touch More wherever you get your podcasts. New episodes drop every Wednesday.
It's Today Explained. So two days after the Wall Street Journal dropped that investigation into Elon Musk and SpaceX, the shareholders of another of his companies, Tesla, voted to give him a pay package of around $56 billion in stock, though of course that number fluctuates as the stock does. Still...
Billions and billions of dollars. The Verge's transportation editor, Andrew Hawkins, is with us now. Andrew, this enormous pay package did not come out of nowhere. There was a fight leading up to it. Tell us where this all started. Yeah, it was a very atypical situation, I would say. This pay package was actually first approved in 2018.
At that time, Tesla was a much smaller company. It was just in the midst of producing its first major car, which was the Tesla Model 3. There was a lot of problems with that production. There is more trouble for Tesla today. The company announced it is temporarily shutting down production of the Model 3. And this pay package was approved by shareholders, was devised by the company's board and approved by shareholders as a way to incentivize
Elon Musk to take the company essentially to new heights. So it was tied to certain milestones. And if Tesla's share price reached certain thresholds, if it increased in value and reached certain thresholds, then he would see these shares vested. Tesla commands attention.
It's been on an incredible run. And lo and behold, over the next few years, Tesla's share price skyrocketed. Tesla shares, they surged another 11% yesterday, closing at a record high and tacking on another, get this, $7.8 billion to the wealth of Elon Musk. The Model 3 was a huge success. The Model Y came out soon afterward. Everybody's favorite stock, Tesla, continues to gain steam after breaking above a trillion dollars in valuation.
Shares up nearly 50% in just a month. And Tesla, as a result, became the most valuable car company in the entire world. It's worth more than GM, Ford, Fiat, Chrysler, and Honda combined. That is amazing when you consider that Tesla may sell 500,000 vehicles this year. Toyota alone sells 10 million. And so he met those thresholds. The pay package was vested, and he became...
$56 billion richer, essentially. But then things sort of fell apart at that point. This mega payday prompted some noise from this man, Richard Tornetta.
A former heavy metal drummer who owned just nine Tesla shares challenged the deal in a court in the state of Delaware where Tesla... Almost immediately after this pay package was approved, a single shareholder, a man named Richard Tornetta, filed a lawsuit claiming that this pay package was too much. He was being overcompensated. It was going to dilute the shares of all the rest of the shareholders.
$55 billion is such a large pay package that it basically skewed dramatically upward the entire data set for the compensation consulting industry. And not only that, but the way that it was formulated and created by the board, it was sort of an opaque process. And shareholders sort of lacked insight into how that process unfolded. Look, the bottom line is capital markets don't work
if you don't tell stockholders material facts when asking them to take action. And that's exactly what happened here. Mr. Tornetta's case worked its way through the court system. And then finally, in January of this year, a Delaware court judge ruled in favor of the shareholder and voided Elon Musk's pay package for
agreeing with the argument that the process was opaque and obscure and that shareholders lacked insight, that the board was too buddy-buddy with Musk. You know, his brother is on the board. One of his best friends is on the board. And so that there was just too many flaws in this process. And therefore, this pay package was invalid. OK, so the judge's critique is aimed at the board. How does the board address those concerns? Well,
So it was pretty fascinating to watch over the last few months. Tesla's board and Elon Musk sort of came together and said that this ruling from the judge was ridiculous and that not only were they going to fight it, but they were essentially just going to go right back to shareholders and ask them again whether or not Elon Musk should receive this money. This is a public company. Let's use direct democracy, essentially, and prove to the court system and to this judge
that the shareholders truly want Elon Musk to receive this massive pay package. And it was an interesting strategy because if you think about it, the company sort of was gambling on the fact that if they went through the process again, but also took the entire lawsuit and the ruling from the judge and basically submitted it to the SEC and disclosed it all to shareholders, then shareholders would have then all of the information that the judge had claimed that they lacked in the first go around. And then all of this came to a head
at Tesla's annual shareholder meeting. Tell us what happened there. Welcome to Texas, the home of Tesla. Yeah, so the meeting opened up and it was sort of going through kind of like the very dry way in which public company shareholder meetings go forward. This meeting is going to be in two parts. First, we're going to cover the 12 items that stockholders have been asked to vote on.
Many of the votes had already been cast at this point because Tesla shareholders had been given the opportunity to vote prior to the meeting. They went through, they read all of the proposals. There were proposals that were supported by the board. And then, as is usually the case, there's a list of proposals proposed by various shareholders that are opposed by the board around things like transparency and sustainability. Let's move on to the seventh stockholder proposal, which is an advisory vote regarding committing to a moratorium on sourcing minerals from deep sea mining.
Our board is recommended against for the reasons set forth in the proxy. After a few minutes of reading all these proposals and people sort of making the case for them, the voting was closed. Preliminary vote total came in and lo and behold, Elon Musk had yet again won his gigantic pay package from Tesla shareholders. I just want to start off by saying, hot damn, I love you guys.
Yeah. Which on some level makes sense because Elon Musk did what he promised to do for the business. On the other hand, you have the Wall Street Journal reporting on these inappropriate relationships with women. And that's not Elon Musk's only problematic workplace behavior. When people talked about, does this man deserve this money? Did anyone say, well, yeah, he did his job. We're profitable. He did great. But also, he's kind of a dick. Maybe we shouldn't reward that. Yeah.
So I don't think those words were exactly used. But yes, it did come up several times. There were shareholders that were allowed to sort of make statements in support of their own proposals. And during those statements, there were shareholders that sort of pierced the reality bubble that you may not normally hear these kind of things discussed amongst the Elon Musk faithful. Year after year.
more harassment and discrimination allegations have emerged with few visible improvements in Tesla's people management policies or practices to assuage our concerns. The Musk premium is already eroding.
Tesla is Musk's liquid piggy bank. Bite the bullet. Prepare for a future that doesn't depend on a superhero dictatorship. So it was a very interesting moment in which these things sort of pierced the bubble and cropped up very briefly, but then were sort of immediately brushed aside then by sort of the overwhelming support that he got for his pay package and his proposals that he was in support of.
So this vote was a referendum on his leadership at Tesla, but also at his other companies. What are we to take away from the fact that he got exactly what he wanted? Well, I think what that means is that Elon Musk is going to be the CEO of Tesla for as far as we can tell for the years to come. Musk is very much trying to sell this vision of Tesla as more than just your average car company, as being something that is on the vanguard of the development of our
artificial intelligence, much like all of these other companies like OpenAI and Google and Microsoft. And so if there are things that are going on behind the scenes, if he is sort of treating employees poorly, which has always been the case at Tesla for years, and people know this about them because they have been sued countless times for gender discrimination, for harassment, for racial discrimination. There have been labor violations. There's just a litany of problems, even aside from Elon Musk and his own personal behavior.
that have implicated the company in really horrendous things for many, many years. And yet, because he is very good salesman, he is very good at marketing himself and marketing sort of the mission of Tesla and sort of as being seen as this person who is capturing the zeitgeist of right now around technology and AI. That is why there is less accountability for him than I think might typically be the case at a public company like Tesla.
Andrew Hawkins of The Verge. Amanda Llewellyn worked on Sunday. Amina El-Sadi edited. Patrick Boyd and Andrea Christen's daughter engineered. Laura Bullard fact-checked. I'm Noelle King. It's Today Explained.