No Spark, No Game: Why Gen Z Can’t Fall in Love (Ep.208)
48:48 Share

This episode is brought to you by LifeLock. Not everyone is careful with your personal information, which might explain why there's a victim of identity theft every five seconds in the U.S. Fortunately, there's LifeLock. LifeLock monitors hundreds of millions of data points a second for threats to your identity. If your identity is stolen, a U.S.-based restoration specialist will fix it, guaranteed, or your money back. Save up to 40% your first year by visiting LifeLock.com slash podcast. Terms apply.

Good morning, welcome to Bongino Report Early Edition. We've got a lot of headlines to get to today. Marco Rubio absolutely humiliates Senate Democrats. Mexico apparently wants a flesh-eating parasite to invade the U.S. A potential CCP-controlled NGO is revealed to have helped illegal immigrants evade ICE.

Megyn Kelly roasts Jake Tapper for being a lying hypocrite. Israel may strike Iran's nuclear sites against the wishes of the Trump admin. WHO introduces a terrifying new pandemic treaty. And a new music video that explains why Gen Z is not having sex, nor are they falling in love. All this on Bongina Report, early edition.

I have to tell you directly and personally that I regret voting for you for secretary of state. Well, first of all, your regret for voting for me confirms I'm doing a good job. So that was secretary of state Marco Rubio annihilating Senate Democrats and a hearing on the Trump administration's foreign policy agenda. Guys, things got strange.

Spicy yesterday, real spicy. Here he is calling out Democrat Senator Chris Van Hollen for having a margarita with the Maryland Man MS-13 gang member who beat his wife and trafficked illegals. Take a listen.

In the case of El Salvador, absolutely. Absolutely. We deported gang members. Gang members, including the one you had a margarita with. And that guy is a human trafficker, and that guy is a gangbanger, and the evidence is going to be clear in the days to come. Mr. Chairman. I'm sorry, Mr. Chairman. Secretary Rubio has the floor. Mr. Chairman, he can't make unsubstantiated comments like that. Secretary Rubio has the floor. Secretary Rubio should take that testimony to the federal court in the United States because he hasn't done it under oath. Ooh, he got under.

his skin like he was you can tell like Chris Van Hollen he's like so angry you try to say that in federal court and by the way Marco Rubio he is right Chris Van Hollen did meet with Kilmar Abrego Garcia MS-13 gang member human trafficker wife beater and here he is having margaritas with him

Now, Chris Van Hollen is calling this Margaritagate, and he is claiming that he didn't actually drink the margaritas. They were on the table. He did not drink them. And El Salvador officials put them on the table on purpose to make him look bad.

So he is furious, just furious that Marco Rubio would dare suggest that he was sipping margaritas with Kilmar Abrego Garcia. And I'm just sitting here saying, "Okay, who cares if you sipped a margarita or not? It was on the table and you still met with MS-13 gang member, wife beater, Kilmar Abrego Garcia to defend the due process of an illegal alien criminal in our country terrorizing US citizens." Like the point still stands.

And he's like, I did not sip that margarita. Okay, Chris. Okay. Like this whole meeting, the entire hearing, it actually gets better. Here is Marco Rubio.

expertly calling out Senator Tim Kaine for opposing South African refugees simply because they are white. We have been talking about this for the last couple of weeks. He is exactly right here. The only reason that they are opposing South Africans from immigrating into this country is because they are white Christians. Take a listen. This is expert.

But I'm going to ask you, what, so a well-justified fear of persecution. Yeah, they thought that their farms were being burned down and they were being killed. I think that's a pretty good justification for wanting to come. They're afraid for their lives. And should it be applied in an even-handed way? That's an easy question. Our foreign policy doesn't require even-handedness. It requires prioritizing the interests of the United States. But the statutory phrase says you are entitled to entrance as a refugee if you demonstrate a well-justified fear

fear of persecution. No, no, you're not entitled. You're allowed. So could you have a different standard based upon the color of somebody's skin? Would that be acceptable? Well, I'm not the one arguing that. Apparently you are, because you don't like the fact that they're white, and that's why they're coming. No, I'm just asking you to say that that would be unacceptable. Well, no, I would say that the United States... That would seem to be a very easy thing to say. The United States has a right to pick and choose who they allow into the United States. Even based on the color of somebody's skin, you're saying? You're the one that's talking about the color of their skin, not me. These are people whose arms were being burned down and they were killed because of the color of their skin. Well, I'm...

Okay, so this was just brilliant. Like he was so excellent, so articulate. And here's what's important to understand about this exchange.

The Democratic Party is choosing, purposely, to deny the reality of white genocide in South Africa. It's there, it exists, we have all the evidence.

And they're choosing to deny the existence of white genocide in South Africa because they want to do the exact same thing in this country. Just last week, Democrats introduced a reparations bill because they want to steal billions of dollars away from white Americans and give them to black Americans in the name of race Marxism. That's the first step, guys. Africaners' land is being taken. Many are being targeted with violence, murdered simply because of their skin color.

And I reiterate that this is what Democrats want to do here because they are informed by the same type of race Marxism. And the reality is that, and this is what Marco Rubio pointed out, Africaners speak English. They share in our Christian faith. They will assimilate more quickly and contribute positively to American society because we have more in common.

There is a European Christian background here. And yet all of that is overlooked. While people with radically different cultures, people who really have nothing in common with mainstream American society, are instead prioritized by the political left.

So it's really hard not to conclude that Democrats aren't interested in helping actual refugees. They're interested in demographic change that aligns with their political goals. The Trump administration understands that immigration should serve the national interest. And at the very least, if we're going to bring in refugees, we're going to open up our homes and our hearts to these people. It can't be a detriment on American society. The Trump administration is saying,

Our priority is putting the needs, safety, and cultural stability of Americans first and admitting those who are most likely to thrive here. White South African Christians check a lot of boxes while also genuinely being in need. But today's globalist, illiberal elites despise nationalism and any strong sense of Christian or European root identity because those things make people harder to manipulate.

This is why I say their immigration agenda isn't about compassion, it has always been about control and cultural replacement. And that's why they actively reject refugees who are most similar to us, even if their need is real. It's just very transparent what's going on here. And Marco Rubio turned the tables, he flipped it on them and said, "Why is it that you oppose refugees who are white?"

That's the central question here. Why are you denying white genocide in South Africa? And the reason is very uncomfortable, something the Democrats don't want to address because they want to do the same thing here. By the way, speaking of the immigration crisis, this next story, boy, is this a reminder that Mexico is not our friend. This is from Melissa Ford in The Federalist. The United States recently suspended Mexico

imports of cattle, horses, and bison from Mexico in response to the return of a silent flesh-eating parasite called the New World Screwworm. The Screwworm, like I said, flesh-eating parasite that poses a severe risk to livestock and wildlife, and it's crawling its way north from Mexico right now. And according to Ford, it

If left unchecked, the screw worm could decimate American cattle, horses, and wildlife, and once it's here, eradicating it could take decades and cost billions. The last time it happened, our livestock industry collapsed.

took 30 years to bounce back. So the good news is that the United States is acting very swiftly to protect its livestock and wildlife industries. The Trump admin's Department of Agriculture under Secretary Brooke Rawlins implemented a 15-day suspension of livestock imports, which I mentioned. This is as of May 11th. And the U.S. is also reviving its proven method of releasing sterile

Oh, Michael says, "This is why we have all family pharma." Yes, thank you, Michael. But the U.S. is also reviving its proven method of releasing sterile male screwworm flies to break the parasite's reproductive cycle. The problem now is that this requires frequent and consistent aerial dispersal, which has faced, believe it or not, obstruction from Mexican authorities.

Customs duties and delays on essential supplies like aircraft parts and fly shipments have hampered the Trump admin's ability to act quickly at the source of this outbreak. And now despite knowing that daily flights to disperse sterile male flies are essential,

to halting the parasite spread, the Mexican government has restricted these operations, like I said, limiting flight approvals, imposing customs duties on vital materials, including aircraft parts, fly shipments, and dispersal equipment. So rather than cooperating in this shared emergency, because Mexico's in this boat too, Mexico is effectively sabotaging eradication efforts

by creating all these costly delays and blocking access to essential resources. Oh, and Mexico President Claudia Scheinbaum is also mad that we have suspended livestock imports for just 15 days, and she's calling this unfair.

So I guess Mexico really hates us so much that they would hurt themselves to hurt us. Like, this is just a really shocking thing. Like, this is a country that has poured millions of illegals into this country. Like, over that open border, they've done nothing to stop it. And we've had an invasion in our country. We've had illegal migrant gangs create criminal networks across this country thanks to the Mexico open border. We have had fentanyl.

pouring over our border, destroying our communities all across the U.S. Mexico was perfectly fine with that. And in fact, Mexico benefits from the illegal immigration crisis because first of all, the trafficking, which is very costly, right? It fuels their economy. And the second thing is that when you have illegals in our country who are former Mexican citizens,

they sent or Mexican citizens they send money back home for their families this is what they do so it's a great it's a massive fuel for the Mexican economy they love the illegal immigration and the fentanyl and the trafficking this is great for them and now they hate us so much for closing our border finally for standing up for our own sovereignty that they're like yeah we're just gonna allow a flesh-eating parasite to destroy us and you because we hate you so much

And by us, I really mean the admin, because you know that the cartels run the Mexican government. The cartels decide who wins and who loses in that country. And if you're about to win and they don't like you, they'll kill you.

And let me tell you, they love Joe Biden. Like, they're not happy with this admin, but they did like Joe Biden. Like, you cannot trust anything that's coming from the Mexican government, because really, this is a narco state. This is a state run by cartel terrorists who have it out for this country. Frankly, demonic cartel terrorists, because they literally worship the devil. We've talked about it on this show. So terrifying story. And a reminder that

Mexico, not our friends. All right, ladies, I have a huge announcement from my friends at GenuCell Skincare. Right now, GenuCell is extending their amazing Mother's Day sale across all of GenuCell.com for only one more week. For a limited time, save up to 70% off all skincare packages, including my favorite, their Eye Essentials package to target under-eye bags, puffiness, and even droopy eyelids. And with its immediate effects, see results in as little as 12 hours or your money back. And as a special gift,

upgrade to GenuCell's membership program and get a free beauty box with your purchase. That includes two of my mom's favorite skincare products. GenuCell is an easy choice. GenuCell contains ingredients for incredible results safely and quickly. It's as simple as that. World-class skincare at a fraction of the price. And best of all,

All of GenuCell's products are manufactured here in the USA. Don't wait. Order now to try GenuCell Eye Essential Package with the brand new Eyelid Lift for droopy, sagging eyelids. Go to GenuCell.com slash news, GenuCell.com slash news. Order now and shipping is also free. Go to GenuCell.com slash news. That's GenuCell.com slash news.

Your gut affects everything, even your mood. So Oli created two brand new products to take care of your insides. Oli Big Ten Probiotic has 10 strains of probiotics, their most ever, to support a healthy gut microbiome, immune system, and stress response. And Oli Super Good Superfoods delivers 15 superfoods in tasty gummy form. Find them at Oli.com and exclusively at Walmart. Oli! These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.

Hi, this is Joe from Vanta. In today's digital world, compliance regulations are changing constantly, and earning customer trust has never mattered more. Vanta helps companies get compliant fast and stay secure with the most advanced AI, automation, and continuous monitoring out there. So whether you're a startup going for your first SOC 2 or ISO 27001, or a growing enterprise managing vendor RIST, Vanta makes it quick, easy, and scalable. And I'm not just saying that because I work here.

Get started at Vanta.com. All right, guys, this next story is wild. A Daily Caller News Foundation investigation has uncovered that the Chinese American Planning Council, the CPC, which is a prominent agency,

New York nonprofit received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Chinese government link from Chinese government linked sources while allegedly advising illegal immigrants on how to avoid federal immigration enforcement. So let me just restate that. So we're all clear. A top New York nonprofit took Chinese government cash while coaching illegal immigrants to dodge ICE.

House Republicans have launched a formal investigation following undercover footage that showed CPC staff coaching illegals on tactics to evade ICE. Now note that

Federal law does prohibit obstructing immigration enforcement. CPC, which has, by the way, received over $1.4 million in U.S. federal grants since 2022, mostly from the Department of Health and Human Services, is now under intense scrutiny for potentially misusing taxpayer money to undermine U.S. immigration laws. Financial records reviewed by The Daily Caller show that since 2018, CPC has received at least $445 million

sorry, my goodness, hundreds of thousands of dollars, over $400,000 in donations from Chinese state-owned banks and CCP-linked institutions

like the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China and the Bank of China and with roughly 55% of the CPC's funding stemming from government sources lawmakers are now of course investigating whether CPC leveraged taxpayer funds to facilitate illegal immigration in this country all while being financially sustained by foreign entities aligned with the CCP and That was what that was mouthful. That was a lot of information for you guys but

I thought, I saw the story and I just thought, wow, it makes you really wonder. Because China is already fueling the fentanyl crisis by manufacturing the drug, the drug that then pours over our southern border. And it only makes sense that they try to facilitate the illegal immigration crisis as well. Like this is a country that hates us, that wants to destroy us from within. They are our enemy. Why wouldn't they want to overwhelm America from within quietly and steadily?

But what's disturbing to me, and this is what made me stop and think is, okay, I expect that from China, but how many people here at home seem to be aligned with that very destruction? These aren't just foreign threats we're talking about. We're talking about American citizens who actively push policies that weaken our borders and law enforcement and our sovereignty, and who get mad when we deport people like Kilomara Braygo-Garcia, wife-beating MS-13 human trafficking gang member.

I am talking about people like Chris Van Hollen and Tim Kaine, guys sitting in Congress and advocating for the destruction of our country alongside the CCP. Like fellow Americans in positions of influence, mostly within the Democratic Party, although some Republicans, sitting in power and enabling or defending these threats. I mean, how do you fight an external enemy when the real danger is already inside the gates?

Like this is what made me stop and think like I expect it from China, but then I think oh my goodness, it's people, it's American citizens who are having the same goals as the CCP to literally destroy us. I mean that is really just something to think about. By the way, speaking of Democrats, Jake Tapper yesterday, oh my goodness guys, this was amazing, absolutely humiliated by Megyn Kelly on her show.

This was simply epic. And we have to talk about it because, guys, she put him in his place. This was so satisfying. Take a listen. But you covered the Biden presidency aggressively throughout the four years and you didn't cover mental acuity hardly at all. I mean, time and time again, when issues came up, you seem to be running cover for the president. I don't think that's true. Well, I mean, we'll start with the Laura Trump issue that you referred. Here it is. This happened in 2020.

Joe Biden, as we all know, has worked to overcome a stutter. How do you think it makes little kids with stutters feel when they see you make a comment like that?

First and foremost, I had no idea that Joe Biden ever suffered from a stutter. I think what we see on stage with Joe Biden, Jake, is very clearly a cognitive decline. That's what I'm referring to. It makes me uncomfortable. You are no. This is so amazing. You're trying to tell me that what I was suggesting was. I think that you were mocking his stutter. Yeah, I think you were mocking his stutter. And I think you have absolutely no standing to diagnose somebody's cognitive decline.

I've already apologized to her. I called her months ago. And what did she say? I mean, I don't want to disclose the contents of a private conversation, but I thought the conversation went well. And she said, she has said this publicly, so I feel fine sharing it. She said that she would never mock anybody's stutter. But I mean, you know, after we did the research for this book and I realized how bad his acuity issues were,

I called Laura Trump and I said, "You were right." - She was totally right. - Okay, so first of all, I feel like I didn't explain this. So for those of you listening, I think we're on the same page, but if you didn't know,

Jake Tapper is trying to cash in on the scandal that he partook in. The key is writing a book and trying to make money off of this whole Biden mental acuity scandal that, of course, he actively partook in because we just saw that video where he was shutting down Laura Trump for talking about it. And we have it on video. And frankly, I felt like I love that Megyn Kelly called him out. I thought she was strong. I thought she asked all the right questions. She really had him on his toes.

I frankly felt like his tone was very defensive and not apologetic at all. He was like, well, I already apologized to Laura Trump. Like, did you apologize to America? Because right now you're trying to sell a book where you're telling me that you care so deeply about America and just that we have a president who doesn't have dementia. But at the same time, you were publicly shutting down anyone repeatedly who dared to say, hey, Biden's not all there. Like,

Like you are the one who did this. And now you're just like, oh, I apologize to Laura Trump. I'm like, how about you apologize to America? How about you apologize to everybody? I thought he came off as very arrogant.

Here's Megyn Kelly questioning why Jake Tapper waited so long to talk about the mental decline of Joe Biden. And the timing here is really key. This is why Megyn Kelly is so brilliant. Take a listen. Annie Linsky and Siobhan Hughes did an amazing job in their reporting and they should be heralded. And I heralded them. I had them on my show right after the debate to talk about their great reporting.

But you did not put them on when they published that story, which was before the debate. Correct. I don't know what the booking situation was, but it wasn't because I didn't want them. I'm sure I said that day. Let's book. I'm sure I said that day. Let's book. Did they? Yeah, you put on a Democrat and you allowed the Democrat to rip on the report as a Rupert Murdoch sponsored hit piece. It's just again, that's what we're going to do this. Let's just stick to the facts here. OK.

when there is a damaging report. Jake, that's what I've been doing all along. I'm talking about what you just said. One of us didn't miss the biggest story of the century when it comes to presidential politics. And one of us did. It's so brilliant because she's right. Jake Tapper missed the biggest story of the last four years. And we didn't really just miss it. He purposely ignored it because he's partisan and he wanted access to the Biden admin.

Only when his buddies and Democrat media and Democrat circles started saying, oh, Biden's not all there. After the debate, when it became socially acceptable to do so, then Jake Tapper finally was like, oh yeah, I'll start to admit to this country what this country knew years ago, that Joe Biden is unfit to serve in office. And this is why Megyn Kelly is so brilliant on the timing here, because you know that

that he is a liar and a scumbag because he waited until it was socially acceptable to call out Biden's mental acuity that we could all see a very long time ago. He's just a human with a couple of brain cells. It's very obvious what was happening to Joe Biden. And by the way, something Jake Tapper never said after the debate, and this is really key here,

Joe Biden, if he's not fit to serve for another four years, if he's not fit to run again, then he's not fit to serve now. And I'm saying this as if we're talking about last year when Joe was still in the race post-debate.

So he was willing to say, I think Joe Biden shouldn't run again. I think we should have Kamala replace him. There's something going on here. Again, when it was so susceptible for him to say so. But he wouldn't say Joe Biden should resign. And if you were honest about the mental decline of Joe Biden at that time, you were sincere and you really wanted what was best for the country, not just what's best for the Democratic Party, you would say he has to resign. He's not fit to be president right now. If he's not fit for another four years, he's not fit right now.

And he didn't do that because, again, this is about protecting the Democratic Party. This is about what's best for the Democratic Party. This is about staying in those elite Democrat circles and not being iced out by his friends. So there's no journalism. There's no objectivity. He not only missed the biggest story the last four years, he ignored it on purpose.

By the way, guys, can I just say that Jill Biden, she's the real villain here. Like I'm hitting on Jake Tapper. I'm saying he sucks. He's the worst. But I mean, Jill Biden, really, can we just talk about that? Leo Terrell, senior counsel for the DOJ Civil Rights Division, really great guy. He tweeted yesterday that it is elder abuse.

It's elder abuse. And actually, my mom said this a couple of years ago, and the press secretary for Jill Biden slammed her, like publicly went on Twitter and said, you should publicly apologize for calling this elder abuse. And my mom was right. My mom was right. Moms are always right, guys, because this prostate cancer diagnosis that it has colonized his bones already, that doesn't just happen overnight.

Joe Biden knew about this diagnosis at least a year ago, if not years ago, potentially before his 2020 campaign. Nicole Sapphire, very smart doctor, she had a video last night where she was talking about how this is something that could have been happening years ago. I mean, certainly everyone knew about his cognitive decline. That was observable and undeniable. And potentially we knew he had cancer. And Jill Biden pushed him to run again,

Until he was strong armed out of this race, like a loving spouse doesn't prop up their partner for the sake of power or legacy. A good wife protects her husband's dignity, not for political viability, but because she loves him. She wants to protect him.

But she watched Biden struggle through political appearances, forget names, misread teleprompters, fall up the stairs, fall up the stairs. She watched the whole thing. It was humiliating for Joe Biden. And as a spouse, her job was to step in and say, OK, that's enough. Let's just go retire.

Let's be rich on all the money that Joe Biden sold out the American people for by selling the Biden name abroad. And let's just be done. Let's retire with some dignity because I love you, Joe Biden. But Joe Biden didn't say that. Joe Biden helped stage manage the entire scandal. And it's really quite disgusting. And I hope that she continues to get called out for it. All right, let's turn to some geopolitics.

We may be, according to some Twitter users, on the brink of World War III because people, U.S. intelligence suggests that Israel is preparing to attack Iranian nuclear facilities. This is from CNN. Multiple U.S. officials familiar with the latest intelligence told CNN this is being done, quote, even as the Trump administration has been pursuing a diplomatic deal with Tehran. So what is going on here? What is this entire article about? So U.S. intelligence

is saying, "We know what you're up to, Israel. "We don't like it, and so we're going to leak "to the American press that we know what's happening "to deter you publicly from acting on this intelligence." This CNN report continues, saying, "Such a strike would be a brazen break "with President Donald Trump, per US officials, "and it could also risk tipping off "a broader regional conflict in the Middle East, "something the US has sought to avoid. "Officials caution it's not clear "that Israeli leaders have made a final decision

This is some more from the report. But...

The chance of an Israeli strike on an Iranian nuclear facility has gone up significantly in recent months, said another person familiar with U.S. intelligence on the issue. And the prospect of a Trump-negotiated U.S.-Iran deal that doesn't remove all Iranian uranium makes the chance of a strike more likely. Meanwhile, this is a lot of information, guys, but this report is really important because there's a lot that it's saying implicitly.

through this article. So meanwhile, an Israeli source tells CNN that Israel will be prepared to carry out military action on its own if the U.S. were to negotiate what this source describes as a bad deal with Iran that Israel cannot accept.

All right, so it's clear, and it's been clear for some time now, that President Trump, along with Tulsi Gabbard and Pete Hegseth and a few others, they're not looking to drag the United States into another endless war in the Middle East, especially not one triggered by a unilateral Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear facilities.

that would completely undermine everything that Trump accomplished in Riyadh last week. This kind of escalation would not only undermine months of delicate diplomacy, but it would easily spiral into a broader regional conflict that really does not serve American interests. And this is a calculation that Trump admin seems to be making right now.

And I think what's particularly striking about this, if these reports are to be believed, again, we have U.S. intelligence leaking to CNN saying Israel's doing this thing because they're trying to deter them. But again, we're dealing with hearsay here.

But I think it's absurd that Israel would even consider acting in direct opposition to U.S. foreign policy while Israel receives nearly $4 billion a year in American aid. And that's an annual thing. We just give them $4 billion a year just because. We're not even talking about the billions more that have flowed to Israel since October 7th for their war against Hamas.

At a time when tensions are already sky high and the U.S. is pursuing every available diplomatic path, a move like this by Israel would not just be reckless. It really would be viewed, and this is I think what the Trump admin is signaling here,

a slap in the face to a government that has been one of Israel's most steadfast backers. So if Israel proceeds down this path, I think it risks not only destabilizing the region, but also straining what has been a cornerstone alliance. And particularly with this Trump admin, I mean, Trump has been a supporter of Israel. Look at the Abraham Accords, moving the embassy to Jerusalem. I mean, this is an admin that I think wants to have a good relationship with Israel.

But there needs to be mutual respect and I think this is what what Trump has been signaling over the last couple weeks as we are discussing tensions between Netanyahu and the president even the fact that we had you know a member of Trump's team a high up member of Trump's team working with Netanyahu to potentially

instigate a conflict with Iran behind Trump's back. These are things that have been viewed by the president as very disrespectful, considering that he has had a longstanding allyship with Israel, as America has for decades anyways. By the way, speaking of foreign entanglements, let's just all take a moment. I think it was just KJP say hold space, like to hold space. Take a moment to hold space,

in appreciation of the fact that we are no longer a part of the WHO, the WHO, the World Health Organization. I am so grateful to not be a part of that crappy organization because yesterday, the World Health Organization Assembly adopted a pandemic agreement to regulate countries' responses to future pandemics. The agreement, which took three years to finalize,

binds all countries that are part of the WHO. So thankfully, not us, because Trump removed us. But wow, I mean, I just have to share this with you guys because it's so disturbing. So while the treaty repeatedly assures that it will reaffirm the principles of sovereignty of states in addressing public health matters, sure, it calls for a one-state response directed by the WHO to all future health crises.

The agreement states that the party shall promote a one health approach for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response. Each country is expected to take measures that it considers appropriate aimed at promoting human animal environmental health with support as necessary and upon request from the World Health Organization and other relevant intergovernmental organizations. The treaty also forces government forces countries to

to adopt medical practices that are deemed appropriate by the WHO, including experimental vaccines and other safe and effective products.

Oh, and countries, this is key here, guys, countries are also instructed to prevent alleged misinformation surrounding a health crisis from spreading in their said countries. So terrifying one world government crap coming from the WHO, a chilling step toward global medical authoritarianism. Really what it is, it's a despotic framework, right?

cloaked in this language of cooperation and solidarity, but we all know what this is. This is like super dystopian stuff. And see, despite its repeated nods to national sovereignty, the agreement's real substance lies in centralizing authority under an unelected, unaccountable global body. And the idea that a single organization could dictate pandemic responses for all nations is

mandating experimental and enforcing censorship and then even misinformation and pushing uniform health policies, that's not alarming. Like I said, that's not just alarming. Like I said, it is dystopian. And we've already seen what this looks like because what did we get?

during the 2020 pandemic, we just got lies. Lies and lies over on everything from lockdowns to vaccine efficacy, just continually lied to and then told that we were spreaders of disinformation. And can you imagine if we were part of the WHO and this crackdown on misinformation was global? Like you couldn't even get information if you went to a different country. Like

I mean, to now hand them even more power after the botched last pandemic with the force of

of binding international agreement is an outrage. I can't even believe other countries are signing on to this. And it should really make you all feel, I think, very proud to be Americans right now, to know that this is darkening, a darkening global landscape. And the United States really is standing as a rare beacon of resistance. It's really powerful. Like I said, I read the story and I'm grateful that we are not part of the WHO.

But we're more than just saving ourselves by doing this. We are setting an example. As other countries bow to centralized control, America's decision to stand apart signifies to the world that populism and authentic self-governance are not dead. They're alive. And I think urgent. Literally for millions across the globe, disillusioned by collusion of global institutions, the U.S. is becoming a standard bearer of liberty,

This is what Trump was saying in Riyadh. I loved this speech because he was just saying, you know, we want to promote the well-being of the American people and we want people in other countries to control their own destinies. This is the doctrine. This is populism. This is America first. America is better off not being able to control their own destinies.

when Italy is doing what's best for Italy and France is doing what's best for France and Japan doing what's best for Japan and nobody is being controlled by a one-world government. They're acting in the best interest of the people because the best interest of the people is always going to be better the more localized you get.

And I really believe that our refusal to surrender is a call for every nation abroad to rethink whether so-called solidarity is worth the price of basic freedom. And you guys should all be proud to be Americans because we are that beacon of hope.

All right, I want to get to something that, again, it really made me think yesterday. So there's this singer, her name is Lola Young. She is a rising British Gen Z music artist. And she's very famous. She's had a few hits recently. And she recently released a song called One Thing. And allegedly, this is going to be the song of summer. So people are saying, that's going to be the song of the summer. Now, I had heard this song. Not very good. It's kind of...

Yeah, Michael says it's garbage. He listened to it too. Not great. But I had not seen the music video until yesterday. So someone shared this music video on Twitter. This is an Ann on Twitter account. Username, I'm going to give them credit, dystopiangf, dystopian girlfriend, at dystopiangf. And this user wrote in reaction to this musical, this is what she wrote.

And this was, I was like, oh my God, this is like so incredible as an analysis because it's exactly what

Gen Z music videos, Gen Z sex culture is like. It's actually very sexless and androgynous and bizarre. And so I wanna play this music video

Unfortunately, I cannot play for you guys the song. I'm not going to get sued. It's obviously not a positive review, so she may actually sue me if I played it. But I'm going to play this music video, no sound, and we're going to walk through it because the visuals here are enough. But you can look up the song called One Thing by Lola. Really bad song. Frankly, I wouldn't suggest it, but you can if you want to. So like I said, I'm going to walk you through this music video. Here we have singer Lola.

Okay, so she is dressed in basketball shorts, a bra, in a locker room. She's not wearing much. It's not very sexy. It's kind of dingy. She looks like she hasn't showered in a week. Her hair is very greasy. It's dyed strangely. She's got these face piercings, really overstated, almost like drag-like makeup on. We can press play again, Michael.

So then the scene changes, she reaches over, she gropes some guy on a park bench. Again, not a very flattering outfit. And the guy looks like he lives entirely on soy. Like not an ounce of muscle on this man's body. I don't even know if he's a man. He may be trans. I couldn't say. And then she, well, let's keep going if we could, Mikey. She's in like a school setting, again, an unflattering outfit.

And she's dancing with other women. We can hit pause again, Mikey. So she's dancing with other women in that previous shot. And she gets kissed on the cheek by other women. So again, gay. And then we get this guy. He's tall, Asian. Probably a real man, I would say, because he's so tall. But again, he looks like he lives on soy. Yep, there he is. We can keep going, Mikey. And then, oh, she's making out with a blow-up doll.

Okay, we get a gay man pole dancing, another androgynous outfit. Then we have this new girl. Let's go back to that, Michael. We have this new girl, no eyebrows, red hair, face piercings. She's nastily eating noodles. Like, I don't know what's sexy about this. We can keep going. Again, androgynous, not very cute, really bizarre outfit.

Just I don't even know what to how to describe this I hope that if you're listening at Apple or Spotify you just go and watch this on rumble because you have to watch I'm looking at now she's in a boxing ring again super unflattering outfit like I don't know what we're trying to achieve here androgynous Michael says definitely a heavyweight. Yeah, I mean, I don't even know what's going on She's she seems like she weighs more than this guy that she's fighting. We can keep going Mikey. I

Okay, now she's with this like metrosexual guy who she seems to be pursuing very aggressively. Metrosexual boy looks terrified. Like he looks terrified of her. Like he's like, it's like completely roles reverse situation. We can keep going, Mikey. Oh, also she's wearing these jeans that look so unflattering. Like man jeans, unflattering 90s look. You can keep going. Okay, another gay man. Like I don't know why she's pursuing only gay men. And...

She puts his hand on her boob like I don't I don't know if she's like having him grope her again like this is just So the entire video so unsexy and the song by the way guys It's about sex like the whole thing is about sex and it's the most unsexy thing I've ever seen she looked bad the entire video all the men looked gay and it's it's like

It's like if Endaname and birth control funded this video. Endaname because it makes men low-T, birth control because it makes women attracted to gay men, birth control because literally it makes women not find masculine men attractive.

And here's the thing, and this is why I say it's so unsexy and it's important to point out because data shows that Gen Z literally is not having sex. A 2019 Australia Talks survey found that 40% of Gen Z respondents have never had sex. Like this is unprecedented. Our grandparents were having way more sex than Gen Z.

Teen pregnancies are going down dramatically, and I'm not saying that teen pregnancy is a good thing, but what I'm saying is the reason it's going down, not good either. What we're seeing is a generation that has grown up in a cultural vacuum where sex appeal has been completely sterilized and the polarity between the sexes flattened. The classic masculine-feminine dynamic,

That essential tension that creates chemistry has been stripped away in favor of androgyny and ambiguity. And it's very unsexy. Men are discouraged from being assertively masculine, women from being unapologetically feminine.

And what's left is like a gray zone aesthetic, like limp, ironic, performatively queer, unthreatening to a fault. There is no spark because there is, there's no tension. There's no friction. No one's drawn to anyone because no one is distinctly anything. And it's, and it's that void.

that makes desire quietly die. Attraction thrives on contrast, on the mystery and the magnetism of the other. But we've replaced that with a neutered sameness.

Cloaked in progressive ideals, men are encouraged to suppress their masculinity and women are encouraged to take on masculine roles, to girl boss their way to the top. So the rough edges of masculinity have been dulled into soy-fed passivity, while femininity has been rebranded into something aggressive, abrasive, and boyish. It's literally gotten to the point where biological men are winning Woman of the Year awards.

It's no longer hot to be a man or a woman. Now it's problematic on both sides. And yet everybody is quietly starving for that very distinction. The allure has always come from the difference, the chase, the roles, the energy exchange. And without it, we get what we see in that Yola Young video, a limp body.

pantomime of desire where everyone is technically undressed but no one is actually sexy. You guys want to see sexy? I have, Michael was like, I can't, what are you gonna use this video for? I have no idea. I want to show you this scene from Alfred Hitchcock's Rear Window and this is with Jimmy Stewart, Grace Kelly. No clothes were even taken off because they were dealing with the Hollywood code at the time where they had very strict rules about what was appropriate or not for movies and this is a thousand times more sexy than that video. Take a listen. As you lay

It's just like the way she says it too is so funny. She's asking you about his broken leg and it's like dripping with sex appeal. Like, and there's nothing androgynous about Megyn Kelly. Like, Megyn Kelly, Grace Kelly, guys. I'm talking about Megyn Kelly in the previous segments. Grace Kelly. And you, you can look at her and you can just see like she is exuding femininity. Clearly,

I think this is where the true sex appeal lies. And again, no clothes were even taken off because Alfred Hitchcock was dealing with these very strict codes at the time for movies. I think clearly Gen Z...

is endlessly connected but physically disconnected, afraid of desire, ashamed of asserting or responding to polarity. And that's a problem, not just because people aren't having sex, but because they're losing the instinct for real human connection, for attraction rooted in contrast, in mystery, an embodied presence. A generation that can't flirt, can't chase, can't yield is a generation that's forgetting how to even fall in love, which I think is very depressing.

And so on that note, I want to end the show. That's kind of a sad note to end the show, but I'm going to do it anyways. I appreciate all of you.

for tuning in, for listening, for being here. As always, you can listen to this show in its video version at 9 a.m. Eastern time on Rumble. You can also follow me, avitadeffy1 on Instagram and X. Also, shout out to my wonderful producer, Michael, for putting all this together. He does it all by himself. He's an amazing guy. So give him some love in the comments and I will see you all tomorrow.

You ready? Let's do it.

All right, let's go. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.