The two most serious federal criminal cases against Trump, related to the January 6th Capitol riot and the unlawful retention of national defense information, were dismissed due to a Department of Justice policy that prohibits prosecuting a sitting president. These dismissals were without prejudice, meaning they could theoretically be revived after Trump leaves office.
The Georgia case, involving Trump and 18 other defendants, is on hold due to a pending appeal regarding the disqualification of a special prosecutor. Trump has also filed a motion to dismiss the case based on his re-election.
Trump was convicted in New York for falsifying business records related to hush money payments to Stormy Daniels. The case is now pending two motions: one arguing for dismissal due to Trump's status as president-elect, and another based on the Supreme Court's ruling on presidential immunity for official acts. The judge has yet to rule on these motions, and sentencing could be delayed until after Trump's term.
The dismissals were based on a longstanding Department of Justice policy that a sitting president cannot be prosecuted. This policy, outlined in two Office of Legal Counsel memoranda from 1973 and 2000, cites practical and constitutional reasons, including the potential distraction and stigma of criminal charges on a president's ability to govern.
Theoretically, yes, but it would be challenging. The cases were dismissed without prejudice, but prosecutors would need to overcome legal hurdles such as the statute of limitations and potential issues with the special counsel's appointment. The likelihood of reviving these cases is considered low.
Trump faces significant civil liability, including a $355 million judgment in New York for inflating his company's assets. This case is on appeal, and Trump has not yet filed a motion to dismiss it based on his presidential status. Additionally, civil lawsuits related to the January 6th riot are ongoing, and Trump could still face accountability in these cases.
The Supreme Court's ruling establishes broad immunity for official acts taken by a president, making it unlikely that Trump could face criminal prosecution for actions taken while in office. However, this immunity does not extend to others who may assist him, leaving them potentially vulnerable to prosecution.
The likelihood of Trump serving jail time is low, especially given his status as president-elect. The New York district attorney has not pushed for imprisonment, and any potential sentence would likely be a fine or other non-carceral punishment.
Trump could potentially use the Department of Justice to target political opponents, but the lack of a prosecutable crime would be a significant constraint. However, investigations could still be disruptive and costly, even if they do not result in charges.
Earlier this year, as President-elect Donald Trump mounted his campaign to return to the presidency, it seemed like one of the biggest barriers to his election would be the battery of criminal and civil cases that had been filed against him. Now, as we near Trump’s inauguration day, what will happen to them?
Law professor and former federal prosecutor Jessica Roth joins the podcast to unpack the fate of the legal cases against Trump. She provides clarity on the status of the major cases, discusses the potential impact of the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling on Trump’s presidency, and examines President Joe Biden’s use of the pardon.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices)