We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Will the End of Affirmative Action Lead to the End of Legacy Admissions?

Will the End of Affirmative Action Lead to the End of Legacy Admissions?

2023/8/11
logo of podcast The New Yorker Radio Hour

The New Yorker Radio Hour

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
A
Amin Abdul-Malik Gonzalez
M
Miguel Cardona
Topics
Miguel Cardona: 美国教育部长Miguel Cardona认为,取消遗产入学制度是重新评估大学入学计划的一部分,旨在促进高等教育的公平性,特别是针对历史上代表性不足的学生群体。他认为,最高法院终结平权行动的决定为重新评估大学入学制度,包括遗产入学制度,提供了机会。即使在平权行动存在的情况下,大学也需要努力确保校园的多元化反映国家的整体多元化。他认为大学应该重新考虑遗产入学制度,因为如果种族不能被考虑,那么姓氏也不应该成为决定性因素。解决高等教育公平问题需要更广泛地考虑如何让更多人更容易获得高等教育。许多学生在小学高年级就因为入学过程和大学费用过高而放弃上大学。学校的隔离反映了社区的隔离,解决学校隔离问题需要解决社区隔离问题。通过校车将黑人和棕色人种的孩子送到其他社区上学,并不能真正解决学校多元化问题,因为这只是人为地创造了多元化的学习环境。不应该过分依赖SAT考试来评估学生,因为考试成绩也反映了学生所接受的教育资源的差异。需要在K-12教育层面提供支持,提高学生的读写能力和计算能力,为他们提供更好的高等教育途径。德克萨斯州录取高中前10%学生的制度虽然能保证高绩效学生进入大学,但也需要注意并非所有高中的教育资源和水平都相同。美国长期以来存在着针对黑人和棕色人种学生的教育成就差距问题,这个问题需要得到解决。许多国家将教育视为对国家发展的投资,这包括投资于高素质的教师队伍和领导团队。教师的低薪是导致美国考试成绩下降的原因之一。高素质教师是影响学生成绩最重要的因素之一。 Amin Abdul-Malik Gonzalez: 卫斯理大学招生主任Amin Abdul-Malik Gonzalez认为取消遗产入学制度是正确的,因为学生应该凭借自身能力获得入学资格,而不是因为父母的关系。他认为取消遗产入学制度的回应大多是积极的,但其长期影响还有待观察。遗产入学制度对种族造成了不成比例的影响。取消遗产入学制度是解决大学多元化问题的一个步骤,但还需要采取其他措施。取消平权行动后,大学的多元化程度可能会下降,除非采取积极的措施来维护多元化。大学需要采取积极措施来维护多元化,但结果仍然存在不确定性。

Deep Dive

Chapters
The podcast discusses the impact of the Supreme Court's ban on affirmative action and the growing call to end legacy admissions, focusing on the perspectives of U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona and the admissions process at Wesleyan University.

Shownotes Transcript

The practice of legacy admissions—preferential consideration of the children of alumni—has emerged as a national flash point since the Supreme Court banned affirmative action in June. Even some prominent Republicans are joining the Biden Administration in calling for its end. David Remnick speaks with the U.S. Education Secretary, Miguel Cardona, about the politics behind college admissions. Cardona sees legacy preference as part of a pattern that discourages many students from applying to selective schools, but notes that it is not the whole problem. How can access to higher education, he asks, be more equitable when the quality of K-12 education is so inequitable?   

Plus, Jeannie Suk Gersen), a professor at Harvard Law School, looks at the problems facing admissions officers now that race cannot be a consideration in maintaining diversity. Gersen has been reporting for The New Yorker on the legal fight over affirmative action) and the movement to end legacy admissions). She speaks with the dean of admissions at Wesleyan University, one of the schools that voluntarily announced an end to legacy preference after the Supreme Court’s decision on affirmative action. “So far, the responses have been overwhelmingly positive,” Amin Abdul-Malik Gonzalez tells her. “But we’re obviously some time removed from the results of the decision. . . . I think it’s both symbolic and potentially substantive in terms of signalling our value to not have individually unearned benefits.”