J
Joyce Vance
P
Preet Bharara
Preet Bharara: 我反复强调，无论Abrego Garcia是否与MS-13有关，他都有权获得正当法律程序。政府试图将此案变成一场关于Abrego Garcia是否与MS-13有关的辩论，但这并非问题的核心。Harvey Wilkinson法官的判决，即使是一位保守派法官，也强调了Abrego Garcia有权获得正当法律程序，这与政府的论点形成鲜明对比。政府漠视法治，追求权力而非宪法或法院的裁决，导致了对Abrego Garcia正当法律程序的剥夺。政府承认Abrego Garcia被错误驱逐出境，却拒绝纠正错误，这体现了政府对法治的漠视。
Joyce Vance: 无论Abrego Garcia的罪行如何，政府违反了法院的驱逐令，剥夺了他的正当法律程序。Stephen Miller的言论歪曲事实，掩盖了政府对Abrego Garcia正当法律程序的剥夺。政府选择将Abrego Garcia驱逐到他害怕的地区，而不是其他地方，这进一步证明了政府对法治的漠视。Stephen Miller将1月6日事件与Abrego Garcia案进行比较，歪曲了事实，并试图淡化政府对正当法律程序的漠视。J.D. Vance等人的言论是诡辩，试图转移公众视线，掩盖政府的错误行为。
Deep Dive
Preet and Joyce discuss the Kilmar Abrego Garcia case, emphasizing that due process should be applied regardless of alleged MS-13 affiliation. They highlight Judge Harvey Wilkinson's opinion, which underscores the importance of due process even if the government believes Abrego Garcia is a terrorist. Preet questions why the administration seems to disregard this principle, suggesting a disregard for the rule of law.
- The administration is attempting to make the case about Abrego Garcia's MS-13 affiliation, but this is irrelevant to the question of due process.
- Judge Wilkinson's opinion emphasizes that even if Abrego Garcia is a terrorist, he is still entitled to due process.
- Preet believes the administration's actions suggest a disregard for the rule of law and a desire for unchecked power.
Shownotes Transcript