We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Donald Trump’s Cabinet of Influencers. Plus, The Harvard Plan.

Donald Trump’s Cabinet of Influencers. Plus, The Harvard Plan.

2024/12/6
logo of podcast On the Media

On the Media

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
D
Drew Harwell
E
Elaina Plott Calabro
I
Ilya Marritz
Topics
Drew Harwell 指出特朗普内阁成员纷纷效仿网络红人,利用其影响力推销产品和提升个人形象,这模糊了政治家和网红之间的界限。他分析了 Robert F. Kennedy Jr.、Dr. Oz 和 Pete Hegseth 等人的案例,说明他们如何利用社交媒体平台进行商业活动,并对这种现象进行了批判性评价。他还探讨了 Matt Gaetz 和 George Santos 利用 Cameo 平台进行商业活动的情况,进一步说明了政治人物与网络红人界限的模糊。 Elaina Plott Calabro 则聚焦于 Kash Patel 的案例,分析了他如何利用与特朗普的关系推销商品,并与 QAnon 相关的公司合作,从而模糊了政治与商业的界限。她认为 Patel 的行为是特朗普本人商业模式的延续,特朗普本人也具备网络红人的特质,并将其影响力用于政治领域。 Ilya Marritz 则深入探讨了哈佛大学校长 Claudine Gay 的辞职事件。他指出,哈佛大学危机源于一封学生组织发表的声明,该声明引发了关于反犹太主义和言论自由的争议。哈佛大学的回应被批评为迟缓和不够有力,这导致了校友和捐赠者的不满,最终导致了 Claudine Gay 的辞职。他详细描述了事件的来龙去脉,包括学生组织声明的发布、社交媒体上的迅速传播、校内外的强烈反应以及 Claudine Gay 的回应等。他还分析了 Bill Ackman 和 Rabbi Wolpe 等人的观点,以及他们对 Claudine Gay 的批评。 Michael Loewinger 和 Brooke Gladstone 则对整个事件进行了总结和评论,他们指出哈佛大学领导危机反映了美国高等教育机构面临的挑战,以及政治人物与网络红人界限日益模糊的现象。 核心观点补充:本文分析了特朗普政府中一些成员利用其公众形象和社交媒体影响力进行商业活动,以及哈佛大学领导危机中,言论自由、反犹太主义和大学管理等问题交织在一起,导致了学校领导层的变动。这些事件都反映了当今社会中政治、媒体和商业之间的复杂关系,以及这些关系对社会和机构的影响。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why are Donald Trump's cabinet picks increasingly resembling online influencers?

Trump's picks are leveraging their large online followings to sell products, boost personal brands, and sidestep traditional media scrutiny. This 'influencer creep' allows them to reach audiences directly through platforms like TikTok and Cameo, bypassing legacy media.

What led to the resignation of Harvard's president, Claudine Gay?

Gay's tenure was marked by a social media-fueled controversy over a pro-Palestinian letter and escalating disputes over anti-Semitism and free speech. The crisis, amplified by public scrutiny and pressure from influential alumni, ultimately led to her resignation.

How did Kash Patel, Trump's pick for FBI director, monetize his influence after leaving the administration?

Patel sold branded merchandise, endorsed QAnon-friendly products, and claimed proceeds went to a vague foundation. He also marketed supplements like ashwagandha, capitalizing on his association with Trump to boost sales.

What role did social media play in the controversy surrounding Harvard's president?

Social media amplified the controversy by spreading the pro-Palestinian letter and subsequent backlash. Influential alumni and public figures used platforms to criticize Harvard's response, leading to widespread attention and pressure on the administration.

How did Harvard's response to the pro-Palestinian letter differ from its previous statements on global issues?

Harvard's response was more measured and less passionate compared to earlier statements on Ukraine and George Floyd's killing. Critics felt it lacked moral clarity and failed to strongly condemn anti-Semitic rhetoric, leading to further backlash.

Why did some Harvard alumni and donors turn against the university during the crisis?

Alumni and donors, including tech executives and hedge fund managers, felt the university failed to adequately address anti-Semitism and protect Jewish students. Their concerns were exacerbated by the perceived lack of strong leadership from Claudine Gay.

What advice did Rabbi David Wolpe offer Claudine Gay during the crisis?

Wolpe suggested Gay use biblical or Talmudic quotes in her public statements to show solidarity with the Jewish community. He also offered to provide a reading list to help her understand Jewish history and the conflict better.

How did Danielle Hawley, president of Mount Holyoke College, handle similar pressures during her tenure?

Hawley adopted a no-statements policy, focusing on internal education and transformation rather than performative public statements. She aimed to build trust over time and manage crises through consistent, long-term leadership.

What was the impact of the congressional hearing on the college presidents who testified?

The hearing subjected the presidents to intense public scrutiny and confrontational questioning, particularly from Elise Stefanik. The media coverage and social media reaction following their nuanced answers put their jobs at risk, leading to resignations and calls for their removal.

How did Harvard's board initially respond to the crisis, and why did their support for Claudine Gay come too late?

Initially, the Harvard Corporation was silent, leaving Gay to face the backlash alone. Their delayed statement of support came after a week, by which time new controversies had emerged, including allegations of plagiarism in Gay's dissertation.

Chapters
Many of Trump's cabinet picks are emulating online influencers, using their platforms to sell products and promote themselves. This blurring of lines between politician and influencer is a growing phenomenon, raising concerns about the impact on American politics.
  • Trump's cabinet picks often have large social media followings and use them to promote products and themselves.
  • This is part of a larger phenomenon called "influencer creep."
  • Concerns are raised about the impact of this on American politics and the potential abuse of power.

Shownotes Transcript

Many of Donald Trump’s cabinet picks are emulating online influencers in their efforts to sell products and promote themselves. On this week’s On the Media, hear about the phenomenon academics are calling “influencer creep.” Plus, a look at the short, troubled tenure of Harvard’s 30th president, Claudine Gay, and the media firestorm that ensued.

[01:00]  Host Micah Loewinger speaks with Drew Harwell), technology reporter at The Washington Post, and Elaina Plott Calabro), staff writer at The Atlantic, on how, and why, Donald Trump is filling his cabinet with influencers. 

[14:27] Reporter Ilya Marritz), in part one of our collaboration with the Boston Globe, dives into Claudine Gay's groundbreaking tenure as Harvard's first Black president. Gay’s appointment began with high hopes in September 2023, but soon devolved into a proxy battleground for American cultural wars — spurring escalating disputes over anti-Semitism and free speech, tarnishing her presidency as a symbol of diversity's failings. This series slows down the whipsaw chain of events to bring listeners direct eyewitness accounts of what happened, from professors, wealthy donors, and spiritual leaders.

Further reading/listening/watching:

On the Media is supported by listeners like you. Support OTM by donating today (https://pledge.wnyc.org/support/otm)). Follow our show on Instagram), Twitter) and Facebook) @onthemedia, and share your thoughts with us by emailing [email protected].