Claudine Gay's tenure was marked by significant backlash, including criticism that she was a 'diversity hire,' which led to her resignation after less than a year. The timing coincided with the Supreme Court's decision to end race-based affirmative action, further intensifying the scrutiny on her leadership.
Harvard played a pivotal role in shaping the idea of diversity in higher education, particularly through its admissions policies. The university's approach, which considered race as one factor among many, was cited by the Supreme Court in its 1978 Bakke decision, effectively making Harvard's diversity strategy the legal blueprint for college admissions.
The Supreme Court's 2023 decision to end race-based affirmative action directly affected Harvard's admissions policies, leading to a significant drop in Black admissions. This decision also coincided with the appointment of Claudine Gay as president, leading to accusations that she was a 'diversity hire,' further complicating her leadership.
J.D. Vance views American universities as hostile institutions dominated by left-wing ideologies. He has expressed admiration for Viktor Orban's approach in Hungary, where the government has taken control of state universities, banned certain academic programs, and suppressed academic freedom. Vance advocates for similar measures in the U.S., including taxpayer oversight and curricula focused on Western civilization.
Social media has fueled instant judgment and backlash against university leaders like Claudine Gay, making it difficult for institutions to navigate controversies slowly. The rapid dissemination of criticism and accusations on platforms like Twitter has created a hostile environment for leaders, often leading to swift resignations or public scrutiny.
The Trump-Vance administration's plans for higher education include cutting federal funding, increasing endowment taxes, and pressuring universities to change curricula. These measures could lead to a significant shift in academic freedom, with universities potentially losing access to research grants and student loan programs, forcing them to self-fund or align with government priorities.
Diversity in higher education evolved from a term associated with integration in the 1970s to a central principle in admissions policies by the 2000s. Initially developed at Harvard, the concept gained legal backing through the Supreme Court's 1978 Bakke decision, which cited Harvard's admissions program as a model. Over time, diversity became a widely accepted rationale for affirmative action, though it faced increasing criticism and legal challenges.
Universities face challenges in maintaining diverse student bodies without race-based affirmative action. This has led to significant drops in Black admissions at institutions like Harvard. Additionally, universities must navigate political pressures from the Trump-Vance administration, which seeks to control curricula and reduce federal funding, potentially compromising academic freedom and financial stability.
Donald Trump has a big plan to remake American universities. On this week’s On the Media, hear how the distinctly American idea of “diversity” has fallen out of favor—from higher education to the Supreme Court.
Reporter Ilya Marritz explains how the deep history of Harvard and the concept of “diversity” is the hidden subtext for much of the recent strife. In the past half-century, the academy (and the business world) embraced the idea of diversity as a social good–an idea developed at Harvard and endorsed by the Supreme Court, until the latter ended race-based affirmative action in 2023. This episode also looks at what’s in store for universities as the incoming Trump-Vance administration promises to pressure them to change curricula.
On the Media is supported by listeners like you. Support OTM by donating today (https://pledge.wnyc.org/support/otm)). Follow our show on Instagram), Twitter) and Facebook) @onthemedia, and share your thoughts with us by emailing [email protected].