The Rise and Fall of Ruby Franke | Truth and Distortion | 7
The Rise and Fall of Ruby Franke
What were the charges against Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt?
Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt were charged with four counts of aggravated child abuse. They were accused of holding Ruby's two children, ages 9 and 11, in a concentration camp-like setting from May to August 2023.
What was the sentencing recommendation for Ruby Franke?
The state of Utah recommended that Ruby Franke serve consecutive prison terms for each of the four counts of aggravated child abuse, as agreed in her plea agreement. The sentences ranged from one to 15 years per count.
How did Ruby Franke describe her actions during her statement in court?
Ruby Franke admitted to being led into a 'dark delusion' and following distorted guidance that isolated her from anyone who challenged her. She acknowledged her criminal activity and expressed remorse, stating she was ready to take accountability for her actions.
What did Ruby Franke say about Jodi Hildebrandt during her court statement?
Ruby Franke clarified that Jodi Hildebrandt was not her business partner or employer. She stated that Jodi was initially hired as her son's counselor in 2019 and later as her mentor in 2020. Ruby emphasized that she took full accountability for her choices and did not blame Jodi.
What was the judge's response to Jodi Hildebrandt's statement in court?
Judge Walton criticized Jodi Hildebrandt's behavior, stating that her actions were disastrous for the children and detached from reality or any standard of decency. He found it appropriate for her to serve a prison sentence, imposing four consecutive one to 15-year sentences for each count of aggravated child abuse.
What is the maximum prison time Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt could serve?
The maximum prison time Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt could serve is 30 years, as per Utah law. This is due to the consecutive sentencing of four one to 15-year terms, with a statutory cap of 30 years.
What role did Kevin Franke play in the case, according to investigators?
Investigators determined that Kevin Franke had no involvement in the abuse. He was separated from Ruby for about a year and did not live in the same house during the period of abuse. The District Attorney confirmed there was no evidence of his involvement.
What ethical concerns were raised about family vlogging in the case?
The case highlighted ethical concerns about family vlogging, particularly the exploitation of children's privacy and the potential for abuse. Experts criticized the practice of sharing children's lives online without their consent, calling it a form of child abuse due to the emotional harm and lack of boundaries it creates.
What steps are being taken to regulate life coaching in Utah?
Following the case, the Utah Senate proposed a bill to regulate life coaching requirements statewide. Kevin Franke testified about the dangers of unregulated life coaching, emphasizing the need for stricter guidelines to prevent unethical practices.
What are the potential long-term effects on the Franke children?
The Franke children may experience a range of long-term effects, including depression, anxiety, panic attacks, and eating disorders. Mental health experts emphasize the importance of immediate intervention, therapy, and support to help them heal from the trauma. Each child's response will vary based on their age and individual experiences.
- Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt sentenced for aggravated child abuse
- Sentences: 1-15 years per count, consecutive, max 30 years
- Significant difference in remorse shown by Franke and Hildebrandt
Shownotes Transcript