cover of episode Elon Steps Back from DOGE, Wall Street Whiplash, and Meta’s Antitrust Trial Continues

Elon Steps Back from DOGE, Wall Street Whiplash, and Meta’s Antitrust Trial Continues

2025/4/25
logo of podcast Pivot

Pivot

Transcript

Shownotes Transcript

Support for this podcast and the following message is brought to you by E-Trade from Morgan Stanley. With E-Trade, you can dive into the market with easy-use tools, zero-dollar commissions, and a wide range of investments. And now, there's even more to love. You can get access to industry-leading research and insights from Morgan Stanley to help guide your decisions. Open an account and get up to $1,000 or more with a qualifying deposit. Get started today at E-Trade.com. Terms and other fees apply. Investing involves risks. More

Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC, member SIPC. E-Trade is a business of Morgan Stanley.

Support for this show comes from HubSpot. Growing a business can feel impossible, but HubSpot's customer platform can help. It's powered by Breeze, their suite of AI tools, so you can generate more leads, close more deals, and scale your service fast. With Breeze agents handling the busy work, customers are cutting sales cycles in half and saving hours on work each week. Best of all, you see the results in days, not months. Visit HubSpot.com slash AI to learn more.

Support for this show comes from ServiceNow, who are enabling people to do more fulfilling work, the work they actually want to do. You know what people don't want to do? Boring, busy work. But now with AI Agents built into the ServiceNow platform, you can automate millions of repetitive tasks in every corner of the business, IT, HR, customer service, and more. And that means your people can focus on the work they want to do. That's putting AI Agents to work for people. It's your turn. Get started at servicenow.com slash AI-agents.

You're gonna have no gums and I'm gonna laugh at your dentures someday.

Hi, everyone. This is Pivot from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network. I'm Cara Swisher. And I'm Scott Galloway. How you doing, Scott? Guess what? Guess what? We are Webby winners once again. Oh, my God. I just want to thank the Academy. Okay. The Pivot won the Webby Award and the People's Choice Award, both of them. Both, yeah. We like that the people love us. For the Best Business Podcast. And the judges, right? And the judges, yeah. The judges and the people. We've got a lot to get to today, but let's take a moment.

Let's take a moment. And also you won for Prof G. What did you win over there? Not, we won for Prof G. Markets or for Raging Moderates, we were an honoree, which just means please send in your $1,300 a year next year to be considered for something. And then, by the way, this business, we should be in the awards business. This is such a racket. And then Prof G. Markets won the People's Choice Award, but not the Judges Award. So the cultural elite or the deep state of podcasting

They just do one thing. Has decided they're smarter than the people who picked property markets. But Pivot, there was just sort of no argument across anybody. Across the board. Will this make us more obnoxious or less obnoxious? Probably more, right? I think we're pretty much hitting the limit of...

of obnoxious. I don't, I can't imagine. Yeah, I don't, I don't see us getting more obnoxious. I got a lot of congratulations and I'm like, it's the Webby. It's the Webby. We're very happy. We're going to, we have to think of a five word acceptance speech for that, by the way. Oh yeah. Yeah. That's right. Scott Galloway is my husband. There you go. I don't like that at all. Do you have any idea? Think of one. Think of one. You're going to go get it. Maybe not.

Someone's going to go get it. My team's been to the dinner. They love it. They say it's a ton of fun. It is. Oh, I love it. Remember I got the Lifetime Achievement? Oh, Jesus, of course you did. You're going to get one at some point. It was so much fun. Lifetime Achievement Award. It was lovely. I had a lovely time there. I had met lots of lovely celebrities that I liked. I want a Midlife Crisis Award. I want an award for best midlife crisis, like really leaning in.

Let me ask you a pressing question. If you could win any award, right? You and I are not award people. We really aren't. But what would it be? What award would you want to have? Other than the Adult Video Tripod Award? Obviously.

Tripod Award. That's good. I just made that up. My nickname in the fraternity. Don't ask me why. Don't ask me why. Okay. What would be the award? A real life award? The real one? I don't know. The National Medal of Freedom, whatever it is, with the White House. They pin it on you. Oh, they put the thing on you. Maybe it'd be at the Kennedy Center. I don't know. Yeah. No, not anymore. No. That'll come back though. Yeah. I know. I don't really care about priests. Don't want a Nobel Prize.

Did you win any awards in your life? I was thinking about that. The last award I won from these other than these Webby's is in, did you have a high school poll? No, not really. Most handsome, most successful, most likely to succeed. You didn't have that in your high school? No, I went to a snotty private school, but go ahead.

I did. I won most comical and Steve Martin, which dates me. Oh, wait. Is there a Steve Martin award and most comical? Well, they did these things like, you know, Richard Pryor. So we could give the black kids. I mean, we thought we were being woke and yet we were being very racist. Yeah.

And we had all these celebs that you were supposed to be in the 80s, like the blondie. They said, this is who you are, and they picked characters. Steve Martin, that's perfect, actually. I'm on Steve Martin, and I'm on Most Comical. Oh, I see that. I see that. Most Comical, that's so funny.

You weren't like best, you know, handsomest. No, not most likely to succeed, not smartest, not most likable, none of that. Yeah. None of that. No. Yeah. No. I have won, I won the Bunn Award in my freshman year of college. Bunn Award, that's something to do with journalism? Yeah. Yeah, it was, I won as a freshman, seniors got it and it upset the entire ecosystem and the seniors hated me for winning it. I think they hated you for other reasons. I'm just going to go out on another limb. Yeah, that's probably true.

I won a Loeb Award once. Oh, that's big. That's journalism, right? Yeah. Yeah. It's all the journalism awards. This was all, you're doing what I'm doing. You asked me not really caring. You just wanted me to ask you. No, I'm just, I didn't know. I wanted to actually- Keep in mind, we only have 90 minutes here, so rifle through your award. I know. No.

No, I haven't won much. I would like to win the MacArthur Genius Award. Oh, that would be pretty cool. That's the one I want. You can't be thirsty for it to win it, though. You have to pretend you're very... You know what award I aspire to but will never happen just through randomness? There's something called, I think it's called the Carnegie Award.

And it's basically the burning car award. And that is they give about, I think, between 60 and 100 a year to people who have risked their own life on the spot to save someone else's life. So it's literally rushing into a burning house. I would run into the burning house to save you. I think you would. I would. I would. I'm a burning house runner into. That's a good award. It's a really interesting. I love those sorts of philosophical questions, though, that in faced with that type of

situation. And by the way, to be more thoughtful,

Men are more likely to run out of the field and try and save their comrades and get shot doing it. And women are more likely, and we hate to establish any sort of gender roles here, but women are more likely to like, let's think this through and not be idiots. Like, how do we accomplish the mission? Without dying. And slow down and be more thoughtful. And quite frankly, that peanut butter and chocolate is really useful in all situations, including combat situations, right? Are you good in a...

In a jam? I did Outward Bound. I was pretty good in a jam a lot. I was surprised. I'd like to think that- Are you panicky? We're all going to die. We're all going to die. We should do a survival thing. That would be interesting. Yeah. You'd want me along. I'm good at calming down emotionally fraught situations when people get upset. I break up fights a lot at bars. Not a lot. I've done it three or four times. I always establish dominance and that's how I work.

Oh, really? Yeah. And I was surprised. I was really kind of like, it was sort of Lord of the, I did Outward Bound and a bunch of other things like that. And I literally was like, I shall be running this now. We shall do what I say. I find as I get older, I'm really happy for someone else to take charge. Yeah. Yeah. Really happy. You'd be a good team member. Especially if she's wearing leather and I have to pay her a couple hundred euros. Leather. Yeah. Anyway. Anyway.

No, I don't. Anyway, we have a lot to speak about. I'm not a take charge person anymore. Congratulations on the Webby again. We're very excited. Thank you, Webby Awards. And congratulations to our team. And team, yes, all the team. Should we name them? Go ahead. Zoe, Taylor, Lara, everybody. And name, Drew is amazing for us. We've got,

Who's Drew? Oh, the tech host has been with me 15 years. Memo to self. Remember Drew. Anyway, we thank, do we thank Vox? Yeah, Vax. Sure, sure. The shot. Yay. Yay. Vox. Vox. Yay. The suits. The corporate. They don't really have suits. The headquarters. That's not fair. They don't.

They're not soup people. They're not soup people. They're actually lovely. Can you imagine if we've been with them seven years, what does that say about how easygoing and nice they are? They have to be. Between the two of us, we've been with them. The chances for a blow up between you, me, and any third party. Yeah. Yeah. Are big. Has he ever yelled at us? No, he never does.

No, Jim's the nicest guy. Jim's the nicest guy in media. Yeah, he is. He really is. He's the nicest guy in media. Anyway, enough about us. Enough about us. Thank you, Webby Awards. It's well-deserved by us, let's just say. Okay. All right. We've got a lot to get to today, including there's so much going on. Elon announcing he's stepping back from Doge following Tesla's terrible earnings report, just as we predicted. Trump sends the markets on yet another wild ride because he's so ridiculous.

But first, Instagram co-founder Kevin Systrom testified this week that the app was underfunded after Meta bought it, boosting the FTC's argument the company was illegally anti-competitive. Systrom said that Zuckerberg was not investing in the Instagram app because he saw it as a threat to Facebook, which he felt was better. He was incorrect, but that's what he felt. I've interviewed Systrom and let me, let's listen to this clip because they used it in the trial to try to impugn Kevin Systrom.

We were struggling to keep this set up, $500 million valuation. And then Mark came along and was like, hey, how about I double that? And you get to keep working on what you love and you get all the expertise of Facebook. You get to work with me, Cheryl, Shrap, et cetera. And that sounded like a really good deal. And-

If you look in retrospect, I think it was a great deal. Think about all the things we've accomplished being part of Facebook, all the things we have plugged into, whether it's hiring, spam fighting, the ad system. I mean, we have thousands of salespeople who are basically selling ads for Instagram, and we snapped our fingers to access them. So a lot of really great stuff. Did you actually snap your fingers? Yes, I snapped my fingers. The ad.

No, but I guess my point is like, yeah, no, you know, I get it. I get it. It's like, which would have happened without the other kind of thing? I mean, if not, we would have been successful as an independent company as well. So they were using this to say that he was happy there. And now let's listen then to a clip from 2023 at South by Southwest where I interviewed Kevin.

I think the worst part of the sale was just like trying to both accomplish something great with the company and also merge it into a company that didn't quite know how to look at you. Were you a competitor? Were we excited to own you? Like, it's like a roommate who moves in and you're like, oh, like this person's really cool, but also there's stuffs everywhere. Right. That's kind of what it felt like for eight years. And...

Bad roommate. Yeah, it's like, are there any good roommates? I don't know. Maybe that's the reason why people shouldn't have roommates. But it was challenging, but we did great things.

That's the attitude that Kevin had for a long time. He was very frustrated internally. Mark was petty with him, I think, and jealous. I think that's no question. It's an interesting trial. It was interesting that they had Kevin there and not interesting that Evan Spiegel, who turned down, who I interviewed yesterday, by the way, in Washington, at Snapchat, who had turned down and then Facebook proceeded to blast them by taking all their ideas away.

Any thoughts on this? I mean, I think people publicly try to put on a good face, right? You've been in these situations, Scott. Yeah, look, Kevin strikes me as a very talented entrepreneur. I don't doubt that anything he says is—there's some veracity to it.

But, you know, he cashed their check. What a shocker. The current CEO or the CEO was on top and wanted to wanted to maintain his platform, his kind of firstborn Facebook, maybe even at the expense of Instagram. But the thing that sort of countered all this is whatever he was feeling or whatever resources he was trying to starve one of the kids from.

He clearly changed his mind because Instagram is now responsible for over half of ad revenue and it's growing faster. And so at some point, better product at some point, the Zuck realized this and has absolutely turned it into a monster of business. So that may have been true then, but clearly if that was true, Mark has, Mark has seen the light and what, what,

I have found or what is interesting, I had dinner with Jonathan Haidt the other night.

And he actually said, you know, I get so emotional and biased about this stuff. He said some of the controls that Meta has put in place for parents, even though they're not easy to use and, you know, you can criticize them. He said the one that gets away with more than or doesn't get the scrutiny it deserves and he thinks is actually the most mendacious is Snap. Really? Interesting. Why? Well, things like their add-on feature where you can, the core components of it, he kind of said are sort of tailor-made.

likely unintentionally, for drug dealing and for people reaching out to minors. Because that feature where you can add on people near to you, immediately it adds people near to you, it's perfect for a drug dealer. I like it. I suppose.

I would push back because I think they've always been doing done a lot of moderation. They've always when they have a problem, they fix it. They don't like bellyache about it. There's like they had a whole problem with a streaks. Yeah. I'm just saying they fix things quickly and they do moderate. They moderate much heavier and they don't. What I'm saying is the attitude isn't.

ugh, what are you talking about? It's like, oh, we should fix that. I would agree. I think it's a locational thing and it's more for your friends and therefore it opens it up more. But I have kids on it. I would rather have them on Snapchat than Facebook because I think they got inundated on Facebook. Well, they're not going to be on Facebook. No. No young person's on Facebook. Or Instagram even. I think Snap is actually pretty scary. And also the whole Zeitgeist of it where it's disappearing messages. It was, right. Yeah.

I mean, isn't that kind of perfect for people looking to reach? It doesn't have to promote a certain level of lack of accountability. But in this information, I don't think that's why they did it. I think it was because they thought privacy was critical. That's not why they did it. I was there. But regardless of whether, I don't think any of those people are looking to harm children. No. But when they have features that make it easy for adults to reach out to minors.

Isn't that a problem? It is, but I don't agree with Jonathan. I think Facebook has done less and been more resistant to dealing with things and they're the big dog. I would agree with you. I agree. I think Snapchat is, I'd rather have my kids, and I get the locational feature, and if kids open it up, there are things you can do to it to stop that. It's much more open to fixing, and it certainly has had issues around drug dealers and things like that. Every one of these platforms has.

I'm just saying platforms like who have had problems like Reddit and Snapchat have always been willing to change in ways and admit in ways Facebook never has. And, you know, I ultimately I think Facebook doesn't really matter because they're the biggest and they have the most impact on everybody. I think that's a fair point. Especially through Instagram. And so they should be the most responsible. My kids are on Snap, though.

Aren't your kids on? Or I guess some kids have aged out of it. It's really about Snap. I think Louie doesn't use it as much, but he definitely, that was the only one he used. And there was one incident where I did catch him with a girl on Snap, but using the location features.

I told you that, didn't I? He went out. He left the house, and I found him on Snap because he's so dumb with his technology. I said, I know exactly where you are. I'm coming to get you. Oh, come on. Be a brother. Help him get some. Actually, his brother turned him in. His brother's the one that turned him in to me.

His brother narked on him? Yeah, well, he's like, Louie's not here. And then we're like, let's use the snap feature. It's a long story, but he wrote me the most legendary text of all time, which is why I love him so much. I wrote him and I said, he took an Uber. He used my Uber.

to get to do some sort of hookup. So a lot of breadcrumbs. It sounds like he wanted to be caught. He was. I was like, literally. So he wrote, I'm like, you are so grounded. I texted him, you are so grounded, I'm going to kill you. And he writes back, he goes, sometime it going to be like that, chief. And that's what he wrote. I'm going to read it at his wedding.

I love that line, sometime it's going to be like that, Chief. Anyway. When I was... You're about to enter into this period of your childhood. When I was a senior in high school, I asked four women to my prom and all of them said no. And my friend, Adam Markman, who I think felt empathy for me, set me up with a woman, a

actually one of the most beautiful women I've ever met, this woman named Lena. I posted the picture of her on my Instagram. Anyways, Lena and I went to the Windward prom and I was so excited. I was telling my mom I was going to a prom and she went with me and I rented a tuxedo and I didn't know how to put the fucking thing on because I'd never worn a tuxedo before. I didn't know how to do cufflinks or anything. Anyways, I said, and she said, well, what are you going to do? And I'm like, well, the after party's near here. And I'm like,

And I might, and I've got a key. I just might bring her back after all of this to here. And, and I did manage to get her back to my place. And you know what? There was firewood in the fireplace that my mom had put in there. Oh no, your mom's so good. Wasn't that nice? She was, she looked at me. I was six to 140 pounds with bad acne. And she's like, he needs all the help he can get. He needs all the help.

Well, you were about to enter this period with your young man that you have, so I hope you've done a good job. Anyway, my kids are great. You know what my mom used to say to me? She would say, when I was talking about my women troubles, which was mostly an inability to get a woman in my life, she would look at me and she'd be like, wine. Wine. Wine. Wine. Wine. I did too. I mean, it's...

you have to do the responsible things, the sex talk, the condom talk, everything else. But just treat women well was the one that I really pushed on him. Well, I told you about the sex talk I had with my son, right? Yes, you did. We're not going to do that again. When I went into his room with a banana and a condom. I know you told this to me. And he said, what's the banana for? And I said, well,

Well, I can't get hard on an empty stomach. Oh, my God. Boom! Never gets old. You can't tell that joke. Never gets old. It gets old. It gets old. Never gets old. Okay, once again. I'll be here all week. Try the veal. All right. The invading Poland one is not allowed anymore. Oh, by the way. No, that joke's not allowed anymore. I need to correct it. It's wrong. What? The Polish cavalry, that was an attack meant to divert troops.

German forces, and it was effective. And it's an insult to the brave men of the Polish cavalry. That attack was actually an effective diversion of German, they weren't tanks, but German armored vehicles. I've had literally

Eight Polish historians reach out to me and say, stop saying that. For your dick joke. Yeah, stop the dick. I think just because it's not funny. But anyway, let's keep going. It's not the only legal trouble Meta is dealing with. Meta and Apple are the first companies to be fined for violations of the EU's Digital Markets Act.

Of course, this is going to happen. Antitrust rules met about 230 million, Apple's 570 million. Both have been giving 60 days to comply. It's hardly any money. So any thoughts on that? Any thoughts on that? On the antitrust? Yeah. The Europeans are extracting funds. I think they're probably not going to pay and they'll just keep

you know, objecting to it for a while. The question I have, I'm hoping you know more about this than I do, but is it, okay, everything's fine and continue? Because that's a parking ticket in terms of their cash flow. No, they have to comply with the rules.

So they have to decide what to do. They can pull out of the things. They can close down services. They've done that in various countries. I think in Canada, Facebook pulled out of news. They don't put news on there. And only right-wing, there was a great piece about how sort of right-wing blather invades social media there because Facebook has pulled news organizations out of it because of something it didn't like.

So they'll have to either comply with the rules or they're going to have to leave. And this is, I mean, okay, so the good guys, you could argue, are winning here. So the EU find both, they find them both for violating the new Digital Markets Act. And it's the first time that the law has been enforced. It was $570 million for Apple and $230 million for Meta. Yeah, I just said that. Yeah. But-

We'll say it again. All right, okay. Okay, so anyways, I'm saying it again. I know you have research in front of you, but go ahead, keep going. Yeah, and then, so what is that? Half of what Apple and Meta make in one day? So the question is, the question for me is, is it going to happen every month unless they change their behavior? Or is this like that old fine where they effectively are like, okay, you were bad, now continue to be bad and you got caught this time and we're fining you, but it's not going to,

really change future behavior? I shall find out. I do not know that. Any Europeans can write us, but I don't know. I think they're going to do other things to not comply because compliance is problematic across the globe from what I understand. They'll figure out some workaround of some sort, but I will find out and I will let you know next week. Is there any predictions for that meta case from your perspective? Most people think it's pretty weak, but Systrom's testimony was definitely strong, I think. Well,

But I do believe one of these companies, I don't know which one, is going to prophylactically spin something. I think that they're so smart that when they feel the wolves circling, they're going to get out ahead of it and go to them and say, all right, what's our blood offering here? What if we spun something?

What if we sold Chrome to OpenAI? Or what if we spun Instagram? I don't know. Or WhatsApp? I think one of them. I think we're going to see our first spin in the next 12 months. All right. That's a good prediction. I don't think it's going to be Facebook. He's very stubborn. But I suspect Google, which has a much tougher case. This case, they feel very confident over it, Matt, about this particular case, just so you know. They're very confident. Yeah.

Although they sort of communicate on social media like they're desperate, which is interesting.

So, next one. Former Alaska governor Sarah Palin has lost the retrial of a 2017 defamation lawsuit against The New York Times. Palin filed a lawsuit after The Times ran an editorial claiming she had engaged in a political incitement ahead of the 2011 shooting of Gabby Giffords, incorrectly drawing ties to an advertisement. The Times issued a correction in under 24 hours, but Palin's legal team argued the mistake was actual malice.

The bar for actual malice is high, established in a 1964 case, very famous, New York Times v. Sullivan, which the Trump administration is trying to get overturned or changed.

It protects news outlets from liability when they publish false statements as long as they did not do so knowingly or willingly or with actual malice. Supreme Court Justice, again, Thomas and Gorsuch have called for the court to revisit the malice standard for well-known people. If you're not a well-known person, you can sue for defamation much easier. Obviously Palin is super well-known.

So she came back the second time. It was like in two hours. The Times had great lawyers, FYI. And also the person who made the mistakes, James Bennett, who has since left the Times, apologized to Palin on the stand this time and actually cried. I know him pretty well. I thought it was quite dignified for him to do so, like to apologize like that. I think it probably really helped the case.

I don't think he's ever going to win, but I think this is over. This is the last stop for her. I don't know if she can keep appealing, but any thoughts? I think she's just a trivia question at this point. She caught this moment of charisma and fire. And then over the course of the last 10 or 12 years, Governor Palin has just revealed herself to not be a serious person.

I thought you were serious. I usually do jokes, but go ahead. Well, and then I think this is actually really important because I think this would have inspired a ton of... The reality is when you're... One of the key tenets of America that's really wonderful is pretty much anyone can say pretty much anything about pretty much anybody. If it ends up you know you're spreading misinformation against someone...

less powerful than you, not famous, and it creates economic harm or undue stress, then you have a libel or slander case. And I think the law mostly gets it right. And they said, in this case, look, you are such a public figure. You continue to say insane things. People respond. People cover you. People are, quite frankly, biased against you. And they're allowed to be biased against you.

And she was unable to prove that. Look, to me, this seemed fairly obvious. It did. But people were worried about this case and a lot of others, including why...

George Stephanopoulos, they settled for that thing that he did to Nancy Mace. I think there were probably some sort of texts that he was warned several times in that case or something. So there was something there for the reason Disney caved. There must have been. But I talked to people at Disney. They were worried that it would go to the Supreme Court.

Like, everyone's worried about a Times v. Sullivan case getting to the Supreme Court, which it eventually will, because the right is very much intent on cutting back. You know, they're trying to get rid of slap laws, which protects journalists from being, you know, nuisance lawsuits in many states, not every state, which is why they try to sue in places like Texas and other places. But they're on the march trying to overturn these things, just like Trump tried to overturn the Civil Rights Act this week, or whatever.

Anyway, it was good for The New York Times. It was the right decision. You're right. And lastly, late Zappos co-founder Tony Hsieh did have concrete plans for his $1.2 billion fortune when he died. The year recently found will, according to The Wall Street Journal. This was interesting. I know Tony very well.

It was a sad end to a lovely person who was quite troubled. The document notes that if any family member challenges wishes, all will receive nothing, marks $3 million for Shea's alma mater, Harvard, and allocates a whole bunch of money to undisclosed recipients he wanted to surprise. He left a lot of Post-it notes of

things. And so he was sort of, he had a real problem, really essentially a drug problem at the end of his life. They thought he had died without instructions, and he really, the last part of his life during COVID was really disturbing, I think. So, you know, it's a coda. I'm glad he gave money to Harvard and other places, but it just reminded me of a very sad story of technology. It is really sad. And it's a

I remember being invited. He had created this kind of, for lack of a better term, kind of cool e-commerce hub commune kind of thing. In Vegas, yeah. In Vegas. And he invited me to speak. They used to do these little gatherings. And everyone said, oh, you should go. It's a total party. And I never went. But his is sort of a tragic lesson on if you don't keep some perspective around why people are around you,

And also he, he made, he's a big boy. He made his own decisions, but there's, you know, they, there's this, I forget the adage, uh, more famous to become the, the lonelier you get is essentially. And he struck me as someone who really struggled with loneliness. And when I was with, I met with the head of, uh, uh,

Warner Brothers film, and I like to re-spitball ideas. And one of my ideas, I think the most, you know, there was that whole raft of big tech. There was Bad Blood, We Crashed, the one about Uber. And I said, the most interesting one hasn't been told. I think the story of Tony Hsieh is actually the most interesting story. I would agree. That's a great idea. It is interesting. I mean, I spent a lot of time with Tony and interviewed him many times.

He was a gentle soul. We would have a running joke because he was a hugger. He'd always be like, come in. He did this happiness tour, which sort of was a tell. He was so sad. He needed to have a happiness tour. But he's always like, you know, I'm going to hug you. And I said, I'll break your arms if you do. I did a video, which I would send you, but you wouldn't watch, of my tour of their Zappos office. It was a very cult, like kind of, you know, Japanese companies, they do calisthenics together and that kind of stuff.

He was trying to have this sort of happiness thing and he had a guy who was head of happiness there and would take you on the tour. And, you know, they'd have all this, like, a lot of candy happening, a lot of sugar, a lot of, like, creative stuff.

stuff in the office with the people and everyone had their own little teams. I called it forced fun. I was like, I don't want to have any forced fun with people at work. But he tried to create these ethos and he did the same thing in Vegas, you know, creating, trying to revive downtown Vegas. A lot of it was very much about him and he had this holacracy thing. We wrote about it a bunch at Recode. He had a whole theory of management and

I remember the last time I saw him, he came to code every year and he's a very good poker player. He had a certain drink he drank, a lot of, it was not absinthe, but it was like that. It was something, Fernet. He loved Fernet. That was it. He was so sad, you could tell, and was sort of forced jocularity.

But a very gentle soul, anyway. So back to me, and I'll relate this to nitrous. I love nitrous, and I have terrible dental hygiene. I've come out of the closet as somebody, I brush my teeth twice a day, that's it. I think I've flossed maybe six times in my life. Oh, I love flossing. And it's literally like social shaming. And every time I go into the dentist to get my teeth cleaned, they're like, you know, your gums are a little bit inflamed. Do you really see this? I'm like, look.

You're going to give me a bunch of shit, a bunch of pics, a bunch of devices. I'm not going to use any of it. I get my teeth cleaned every three months. I want you to turn the nitrous up. I want you to turn on Tom Petty. I will be back here in three months, but save the fucking speech. I don't have good dental hygiene. They can't fix it if you don't do that. You need to have everything.

thing. You have to do the water, the pulsing water. The pulsing water? No. If you get your teeth cleaned every three months, that helps. You're going to have no gums and I'm going to laugh at your dentures someday. You need to do those things. I'm sending you a water pick. You need a water pick at least. Yeah, I tried that. Water picks are great. I do a water pick twice a day. I love it. It's great.

My gums are excellent. Anyway, let's go on a quick break. When we come back, enough of the water. No joke, my son, my youngest son won't come into our bathroom anymore because I traumatized him by chasing him around with a water pick. Oh, okay. Okay. True story. It's not a weapon. When we come back, Elon heads back to Tesla and Scott makes a great prediction.

Support for this show comes from Delete.me. There's a whole online industry of data brokers. Things that are really best kept private, like your name, contact info, photos, and addresses, could all be compiled by data brokers and sold online. Delete.me makes it easy, quick, and safe to remove your personal data online at a time when surveillance and data breaches are common enough to make everyone vulnerable. I have not had a data breach, thankfully, but I've known lots of people who have, and the consequences are very dire. It's so much your stuff is exposed.

And I really enjoy Delete Me because you can really see what you can do to help prevent it or just to know what's out there and get to be very aware of data breaches in the modern age. Take control of your data and keep your private life private by signing up for Delete Me now at a special discount for our listeners. Get 20% off your Delete Me plan when you go to joindeleteme.com slash pivot and use the promo code pivot at checkout. The only way to get 20% off is to go to joindeleteme.com slash pivot and enter code pivot at checkout.

That's join deleteme.com slash pivot code pivot.

Support for Pivot comes from Vanta. If you could automate 90% of one part of your life, you might choose cleaning your house or writing thank you notes or working out. But if you're a startup founder or a security professional, you'd probably choose compliance. Makes sense. Achieving and maintaining compliance takes a ton of time and money. Vanta is a trust management platform that helps businesses automate up to 90% of the work for in-demand security frameworks, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA.

Vanta also saves businesses time by centralizing security processes and helping them complete security questionnaires up to five times faster with AI. And Vanta saves you money. A recent IDC white paper found that Vanta customers achieve $535,000 per year in benefits. Making sure your company is meeting its security compliance standards isn't optional. But with Vanta, the amount of time you need to spend on it is. Go to

Go to vanta.com slash pivot to meet with a Vanta expert about your business needs. That's vanta.com slash pivot. Support for this show comes from Smartsheet.

Did you know there is one human experience more universal than death and taxes? What do you think it is? Take a guess. Okay, I'll tell you. It's creativity. I know you're probably thinking, yeah, right, I'm not that creative. Or maybe you're thinking, I am creative, but I have just so much trouble tapping into my creativity. And in that, my friend, you are not alone. Because perhaps there is actually one thing more universally human than death and taxes and creativity, distraction.

That's where Smartsheet comes in. Smartsheet is the work management platform here to help you clear clutter, break down barriers, and streamline your workflows to allow your creativity to, you know, flow. Its innovative platform lets your team find its rhythm no matter the obstacles. When robots emerge, Smartsheet empowers teams to chart a new course, one where innovation thrives.

We all have the power to tap into creative flow. We just need some help clearing away distractions and Smartsheet knows exactly how to do that. Smartsheet, work with flow. Learn more at smartsheet.com slash box.

Scott, we're back. Elon says he's, shocker of shocker, Elon says he's scaling back this time at Doge, starting in May, claiming his work is mostly done, which means he got nothing done. He will instead be allocating more of his time to Tesla. The announcement came in the wake of Tesla's brutal earnings report, with net income falling 71% during the first quarter of 2025. In a letter to shareholders, the company referenced changing political sentiment that could have meaningful impact on demand for our products in the near term, you think?

Tesla shares were up over 5% following his announcement that he's returning to the company, which is shocking because I think him not returning to the company is probably better for it. And as of this recording, it's still up. We've, of course, been calling this for weeks. Scott, let's listen to what you said back in February.

Doge and Elon Musk are going to fade away because you can be sure he's doing the math. And he's like, even if I can get rid of all those pesky regulators, I'm still losing money here because my sales are plummeting because the general public across the US, much less Europe, when they see these idiots surrendering to Putin and when they see the type of recklessness and they see that they're not saving any money, all they're doing is making our government less competent and

You're going to see Tesla sales continue to plummet. Tesla stock continue to go down. And I think he's going to fade back to the corporate sector. Boom, goes Scott Galloway. This is why we want a Webby. This is why. This is why.

This is why. So it all came true. Obviously, besides the shares being up, though, if you look, take apart the report, they would have been drastically non-profitable had it not been for selling emissions, things that Trump is trying to get rid of, and investments, I think, in Bitcoin or something like that. It earned this $595 million. And again, these regulatory credits to other automakers,

which are going to be rolled back, was critical to that. It wasn't because of cars. Do you think the companies, let's go for more, has the company been permanently damaged? And again, I would underscore, it's not just the political stuff. They haven't made a great product. They made the Cybertruck, which is a dud. And they haven't rolled out great products at other carmakers because all other carmakers are going up in EVs and hybrids.

So more than 47% of Americans have a negative view of the company, according to a new CNBC survey, and more than 52% have a negative view of Musk. So how did they get out of the brand hole? Also financially. He's touting robo-taxis, which he says will move the financial needle in a significant way, but this is not true. He's got competitors with Waymo. He's predicting one million units of the Optimus Robots in less than five years. I think Optimus Robots is the Cybertruck of the next thing.

that he's doing. So what do you see in the next couple of, let's have some predictions from Scott Galloway on this topic. Yeah, but whatever I predict about Tesla tends to be wrong. I'm not talking about the stock because I think you were right about, I'm talking about, can he pull out of this hole? One, can they pull it? I think they can't, but I want to love to know what you think. Well, it all comes down to one thing. It's very mundane. It's product. If they come up with a hit product, they're kind of back. The problem is, is that this has become a meme stock and,

And keep in mind, automotive revenue declined 20% year on year, Cara. They're now the fastest declining automobile company, I think, in the world. I'm having trouble thinking of an automobile company that declined 20% year on year. And what is just so fucking cynical about Elon Musk is he goes after, he parachutes into town with a chainsaw and starts talking about government waste. Without government subsidies, this company would have lost money.

It's just so incredibly cynical. It's government largesse and subsidies that are the only reason that Tesla kept in, was in the black. And then the thing about Tesla that said that we're not even an automotive company, and if we are an automotive company, we're an entirely different type of automotive company, is they could point to the fact that electric cars have much fewer parts, dramatically collapsing prices.

the supply chain. He milled a lot of his own products, which would increase margin. He's technically the most vertical automaker in the world. And also to Tesla's credit, it's the most American-made car in America, meaning more parts that go into their car are from

And as a result, in 2022, Tesla had operating margins of 20%, which is staggering. That's double, that's at least double what the other big automakers report in terms of operating margin. But what's happened this year, this quarter, their operating margins have dropped to 2.1%.

So this is an unprofitable government subsidized. I mean, this is DeLorean. This is a company that's riding on government subsidies right now. Explain for the kids what DeLorean is, just so you know. Oh, do you remember John DeLorean? Yes, I do. So John DeLorean was kind of a man's man in the 70s. I think he came from Chrysler GM and he was considered the best automobile designer. He designed the Pontiac GTO.

He raised a shit ton of money to start a new automobile company called DeLorean that was famously portrayed in Back to the Future. He got huge subsidies from the United Kingdom to say, the United Kingdom said, "All right, we're going to give this company enormous subsidies to try and re-inspire manufacturing domestically," similar to a tariff.

And then the car was kind of underpowered and just didn't have any consumer reception. And then this photo came out of, I think it was a warehouse in Ireland showing thousands of, excuse me, DeLoreans just sitting there. He was on the ropes. The UK said no more subsidies. It was not selling. And basically they set up a sting, the US government, to try and entrap him. And they did.

and gave him the opportunity and seduced a guy, in my opinion, unfairly, who was desperate to pull his company out of this tailspin. And he agreed to finance or take part in what was ultimately a cocaine trade. And he was arrested on the spot. I believe he served some time and then he converted to Christianity. And, you know, he was he was the you want to talk about a fall from grace. He was also married to one of the most beautiful women and a big model at the time at the Christina Ferrara, I think her name was.

But he was an American icon that really fell from grace. And there's a couple, I mean, a lot of life lessons here, but more specifically, cars are almost impossible to make today.

on a single platform. Rivian, which is an amazing car, if you buy one for 80 grand, it's costing them 120 grand. It's all about scale. And when the sales of Tesla go down, it's an especially big hit to earnings because this is a business all about scale. And when you start descaling, your profits are the tail of the whip.

But it's insane that this company... And the stock went up. That's what I don't get. Well, because they think, you know, it's a meme stock. Like, it's never... Here's the problem. He has been warned by his own employees about the Cybertruck. He was warned about, you know, different things where they warn. The other thing is, as we talked about last week, rolling odometers faster. All stuff like that. Saying we're going to...

Like I think this week he said he keeps going on and on about self-driving. That is not, he's nowhere near, he's been bragging, as you noted, you put the list of things he's told untruths about, or just, well, he's dreaming. I'll say his dreams of what's going to happen. And so if he's got to deliver and not promise, and the same thing with Doge, two trillion, not one trillion, two trillion I'm going to save.

And then they can say $160 billion. And even that, David Fahrenthold has taken apart. He probably has cost the government more through this Doge thing than he has created. What he's done is he's destroyed things the right wing wants destroyed, like USAID or the regulators that are against him. He's not done any significant changes to the way the government works, which, you know, and again, as we both pointed out,

Maybe the government works a lot better than you think. There's fewer government officials. Evan Spiegel was pointing this out. There's fewer government workers than there were 20 years ago. And there's just more regulations, that's for sure. But he's just hasn't, this is like, he has now become an over-promiser, an under-deliverer. And that's what he's doing here with these ridiculous talking about the robo-taxi. Let me just, Uber has $12 billion in revenue. That's it. That's far from a trillion dollar business.

The second one, Optimus Robots. Are you going to buy an Optimus robot, Scott? I don't know. Are you? Like a million units? This is...

This is OK. These guys are geniuses in saying that we have to put something out there in the future that's exciting and exotic. Love it. They will never have to deliver up to the people can at least fill their dreams and somewhat justify such that I can have Kathy would say there's going to be a billion robots and justify my irrational valuation. By the way, just I need to correct this. He was found DeLorean was found not guilty. And I just want to go back to this for a second.

In 82, he was charged with cocaine trafficking after FBI informant James Hoffman solicited him as a financier in a scheme to sell 220 pounds. It was total entrapment. At the time, you know, Tesla or sorry, DeLorean was on the verge of bankruptcy. And a guy approaches you who's a federal agent and says, I have a way for you to make a lot of money if you if you sell 200 pounds of cocaine. And he said, yes, yes.

and then they try and charge them. I mean, you want to talk about government overreach. Anyways, but I'm sorry, back to Tesla, the robots, give me a fucking break. I mean, come on. That is even more pie in the sky than a million self-driving Tesla taxis.

That is just insane. And by the way, the robots they featured at that big event were being controlled by people 50 feet away. Same thing with the self-driving. Same thing with the self-driving. So you want to talk about jazz hands. But people are excited that he's back and focused on Tesla. So good for them. I have learned to stay away from this stock, but...

This is a company now that is underperforming Ford Motor by a long shot and yet trades at 70 times earnings and Ford trades at whatever, 10. So crazy town. I got to tell you, he did the Cybertruck, guys. He did the Cybertruck. And talk about a disastrous company.

and the costs when he could have been doing smaller cars the way they were doing them in Japan, adorable ones. I bet they would have done a great job at those. Like, and all the different, there's ones in Japan, there's ones in China. Instead, he had to do his ridiculous

I have a small penis, Cybertruck, and this is where we are. We'll see what he does. We'll see. Interesting to see if one last thing, Steve Bannon, who was at this conference I was at yesterday, was noting, and I can't believe I agree with Steve Bannon on many things, but he said, we need an absolute detailed list of the fraud he found, a detailed and checked independently list of the fraud he found.

and a detailed list of any data that he has touched so that we know if he took it anywhere. Like these two things, like the data they've been collecting and coalescing around in a certain... What have these people done with the data? Steve Bannon is correct about this because it's going to show that very little was saved and we have to have an independent assessment, which we're not going to have until the end of the Trump administration. But...

You know, I would agree with that. And we're not going to get that, but that's that's we'll see. Well, we don't know what's going to happen this stock because people have a thing with this guy, but he's definitely on a downward plunge, I think. Well, let's talk a little bit about Doge. He's claimed on stage he was going to find two trillion dollars in savings. He's claimed one hundred and fifty billion, which is obviously a lot less than two trillion. And so far,

It looks as if it's approximately, they claim now they're saying $150 billion. It looks like it's more like $60 billion and they can't even validate or confirm those savings. If you were to look at this as an audit of a $7 trillion company, the fact that they have gone in with full license and what I'll call incredible adjectives and embellishments and exaggerations around quote unquote fraud and waste.

The U.S. government has come out with literally the cleanest bill of health of any organization that would undergo this type of reckless audit. The people, the auditors weren't there to give them a clean bill of health. The auditors were there to try and make them look stupid and exaggerate inefficiencies. And get rid of certain things, as I noted. Yeah. And every time they think they found something, or not every time, but most of the time they think they found fraud, waste, or inefficiency and they posted it, someone did a little bit of research on Google and said, actually, that's not accurate. You're exaggerating something.

And by the way, I don't think there's been a single case where they've said there's fraud here and we're charging these people. So what entity, what organization in the world could you have this type of bias, aggressive, unbridled audit that's doing sales?

$700 billion a year in sales, much less $7 trillion, and get this clean bill of health. Although I don't even think they did a very good job. Like, who knows what's there? I'm certain there's fraud all over the place, Medicaid and everything else, but they didn't do it. It was all... And a lot of this spending, we can't... It's already... It's stuff we can't touch. And that's the real problem, whether it's Medicare, whether it's defense spending. There's certain stuff that can't be touched, Social Security. And it's a bigger problem of...

Listen, at the heart, we shouldn't have these deficits, these enormous deficits. We overspend. We have too many regulations. And that's a really good thing to attack. But this has just been a ridiculous jazz hands. This was nothing but a weapon of mass distraction. If the U.S. was a household, it makes $50,000 a year. It spends $70,000.

And it has household debt of $370,000. And the bad news is that all of the kids in that house are going to have to inherit that debt even after mom and dad die. And we don't want to have an adult conversation. The adult conversation is the following. It's a chainsaw. If you believe that fiscal responsibility means not spending $7 trillion and $5 trillion in tax revenue...

All roads lead to the same place, folks. You either have to cut costs or cut spending, or you have to raise taxes. And if you want to cut spending, you have to go after one or all of three areas. And that's either entitlements, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, defense spending, or the interest rate, the interest on our debt. Those are the three. If you don't go after one or all of those things,

you're not serious about cutting our expenses or you have to acknowledge that

that the wealthiest in our society have figured out a way to weaponize the tax code and have an alternative minimum tax. The majority of very wealthy people pay very little in tax relative to their income or increase corporate taxes. And what's the answer, folks? All of the fucking above. Yeah, but they're not going to do... They talked about it this week, Trump people, and then they just have been indicating no taxes on rich people. When we interviewed Leader Jeffries, I think there's an opportunity for the Democrats to say, where are the adults in the room?

We're going to have to means test Social Security. Move the age up. People like Kara Swisher and Scott Galloway should not get Social Security. It's called a Social Security tax, meaning you pay into it. It might not get it back. It's for the better common good. It's not called the Social Security pension fund.

We are going to have to figure out a way to get our medical costs from $13,000 a person down to $6,500. We're going to do that by lowering the age eligibility of Medicaid and Medicare, which do a great job, until we have nationalized health care. So we're going to have to cut military spending at some point or make it more efficient. And we're going to have to announce

that we are going to put $40 billion a year, $7,000 a year in every baby's 401k that they don't have access to their 65 and announce that we are doing away with all social security in 65 years. And then in 30 years, interest rates will come down as people see a light at the end of the tunnel where we'll get to do away with this $1.3 trillion in growing tax on young people. But nobody wants to have a fucking serious conversation. That's a really nice, I like all that.

But the Democrats have an opportunity here because the reality is the swing voters in every election that determines the president, it's not based on transgender rights. It's not based on Ukraine. As important as those issues are, they don't swing elections. What swings elections is

is people in their 30s who are moderates who basically vote on who they think will give them the best prospects to establish economic security and have a reasonable life. And it swings back and forth. It's a swing issue. And over the last 40 years, Democratic administrations have created 40 million jobs. Republicans have created 1 million. Democrats need to seize. We're the adults in the room. We have to have an honest, hard conversation with

around our deficits and our fiscal and monetary policy, because this is not sustainable. And you know what? People will respect it. And then when I asked Leader Jeffries, what they say is, well, at some point, we're going to have that conversation. At some point tomorrow needs to be today. I think citizens are ready for this conversation. Yeah, I agree. I think you need to run for president, as Ed said. Apparently, Ed was telling you you should run for president. That's a very good, you should be more involved in politics, Scott. I think you should.

Anyway, by the way, Tesla we think is in the crapper. By the way, I just want to acknowledge, I've been doing research. You blew my mind with the notion of a combined Tesla, XAI, and SpaceX. And I'm just like, that has totally blown my mind. As long as you attribute it to me. Just attribute it.

I do. But the idea of him merging all of those companies, like I can't wrap my head around what that would mean. He's got to. It's the only move. And he would do it. That's the two things. Knowing him, I don't know him well anymore, but knowing him as I had known him, and it's the move. It's a jazz hands move of all time. It'll be loud, noisy. It'll be what a genius. Here's the last thing I'm going to say about this. All you people that were like slathering, like,

over Elon when he was visiting Congress and protect—we all love Doge. You don't all love Doge. You just, you are—the Republicans should be embarrassed for all the kissassery they did to this guy and what he was doing and abrogating their responsibilities as legislators.

Just handing it over to this guy and saying, you fix it, was the most irresponsible thing. And someday there is going to be a reckoning at some point. And you are not going to be looked... You have not bathed yourself in any kind of glory. You've bathed yourself in embarrassment and suck-upery. So that to me is really...

the lesson here. We'll see where it goes. But, you know, I see why Donald Trump did it. The rest of you are grotesque. So is Donald Trump. But anyway, I'll note alphabet earnings are coming after we record, so we don't know what's going to happen or anything they might say about the case that they both case they've lost. But we'll discuss next week because they're really at a crossroads. Google certainly is. All right, Scott, let's go on a quick break. When we come back, we'll talk about Trump trying to calm the markets down after his own comments created chaos.

Support for today's show comes from Chevrolet. Whether it's a quick jaunt or a long journey, no matter where you're going, the all-electric Equinox EV allows you to travel with confidence, comfort, and connectivity. Equinox EV comes equipped with a standard 17.7-inch diagonal color display touchscreen, making it the largest center screen among EVs in its class.

It's sleek lines and a commanding stance define the exterior of Equinox EV, while the no-compromises interior has a cargo room and storage that let you do you at a starting price of around $34,995. Equinox EV, a vehicle you know, valued you'd expect, and a dealer right down the street. You can go EV without changing a thing. Learn more at chevy.com forward slash Equinox EV.

Based on latest competitive data, the manufacturer's suggested retail price excludes tax, title, license, dealer fees, and optional equipment. Dealer sets final price. Support for Pivot comes from ZocDoc. When was the last time you needed to go to a doctor but you pushed it off?

Let's spin the wheel of excuses to see where you land. I'm too busy. It'll heal on its own. I don't need help. I don't know which doctor to go to. Look, booking a doctor's appointment can feel daunting. But thanks to ZocDoc, there's no reason to delay. They make it so easy to find and book a doctor who's right for you.

ZocDoc is a free app and website where you can search and compare high-quality in-network doctors and instantly book an appointment. Appointments made through the app can happen fast, typically within just 72 hours of booking. You can even book same-day appointments to take some of that stress out. Once you find the right doctor, you can see their actual appointment openings and choose a time slot that works for you. Plus, you can filter for doctors who take your insurance, are located nearby, might be a good fit for any medical need you may have, and are highly rated by verified patients.

You can stop putting off those doctor's appointments and go to ZocDoc.com slash pivot to find and instantly book a top-rated doctor today. That's Z-O-C-D-O-C dot com slash pivot. ZocDoc.com slash pivot.

Take your plans out of the group chat and get long weekend ready in new Abercrombie. From day to night, pack new outfits for every part of your itinerary. Grabbing brunch? Throw on the A&F Mila dress. Then head to your dinner reservation in their new Bubble Hem mini dress. And yes, permission to overpack for pics with the girls. Abercrombie's best-selling Scarlet Squirt deserves a post in your feed. Your plans are worth it.

shop Abercrombie's new long weekend collection online or in store. Scott, we're back. It's another whiplash week on Wall Street. President Trump's attacks on the Fed chair, Jerome Powell, calling him a major loser and criticizing his policies rattled the market earlier this week, triggering a major sell-off of stocks and bonds. Trump later said he had no intention of firing Powell. By the way, he can't.

It's very hard to do so, so it doesn't matter what he thinks. He also indicated some easing of tariff tension with China. But as of Thursday morning, China is calling any reports of tariff talks, quote, baseless rumor is directly aimed at Trump there, sending the Dow down briefly, although the S&P 500 has been staying steady.

Once again, the markets seem to have spooked Trump, as they should. He met with CEOs of Target, Walmart, and Home Depot on Monday. It was interesting Amazon wasn't there, but who reportedly warned about tariffs leading to price surges and empty shelves within weeks. A dozen states also sued to block Trump's tariff, arguing he doesn't have the authority to impose them. Even though he says he's not firing Powell, he's been undermining him. He's trying to blame, he's going to blame him for all this with the attacks on

He continues to act like he has some sort of control over this. Let's talk about that for a minute. Well, actually, let me go through everything. And with China, Trump said this week that tariffs on Chinese goods will come down substantially, but won't be zero and that the U.S., they weren't before. And the U.S. and China are actively talking, which I said China denies. One White House senior official told The Wall Street Journal that China tariffs would likely get reduced any roughly between 50 and 65 percent. Another Trump blink seems imminent.

Again, Scott Bessent and Elon Musk got in a fight. I think it's sort of in our rearview mirror. Scott Bessent won with the IRS pick.

This kind of chaos is just insane, it seems. Like he's just shooting himself in the foot over and over again and then pretending, declaring victory when he goes back on the stupid thing he did. Let's hear what you think about this, Scott Galloway. Well, the only two things you have to remember in a negotiation are not to make it emotional, not to have it be a win-lose, and to always show a credible willingness to walk away.

This guy gets an F on each of those. He's insulted them. His vice president has called them peasants. He makes it emotional. He pisses off. People are human. If I'm a Canadian, I don't want to work with you. I'm willing to sacrifice my own economic prosperity. Travels down. Everything's down.

You want to talk about, and I was thinking about it today, Bill Ackman, on an unrelated note, Bill Ackman came out with this tweet that sent Hertz stock up 100%. And he said, he'd been aggregating a stake for a long time. And he said that because of these tariffs, the value of Hertz's automobile fleet

is it's a $14 billion fleet or $12 billion fleet. The cost of cars is going to go up so much because of these tariffs that it's an underappreciated asset in the sense that Hertz fleet is now worth $1.2 billion more. And I'm like, this is the ultimate interpretive dance.

Because one, that's like saying my liver and my lungs are more valuable than they are to me. Well, I'm sort of fond of them. Like, how are you going to harvest? Unless Hertz announces it's selling its auto fleet, which they're not going to. Well, they sell some of it. They do have a division that sells cars. Yeah, but they have a division that buys cars. Yes, that's correct. So it should be a net neutral.

Right. Actually, a net negative, because new cars will be more those costs will be more than the increase in the value of the used cars you sell. And then the countervailing force of this, what I'll call gymnastics and interpretive dance to try and turn chicken shit into chicken salad is that the majority of the automobile rental market is based on tourism.

And tourism is absolutely crashing. And let's just talk about reality here as we're trying to boost the manufacturing sector that employs 11 million people. Has anyone noticed while we were sleeping that tourism is fucking crashing and also employs 12 million people?

So all of this interpretive dance around these sycophants trying to either pump a stock they have an activist position in or trying to claim that this guy's playing 4-D chess just can't look at data. And also, back to Trump. He's been very emotional. I like that you turned on Blackmun the way I had. But go ahead. He's been... I mean, it's like...

I would describe the day he announced that as, remember when you go to interpretive dance, you look at modern art and you're like, oh, you want to be cool and you want to say, oh, it's beautiful. And then you look at the next person, you're like, this makes no fucking sense. I mean, this is his announcement that they have this undervalued asset is really modern art slash interpretive. Also, may I note, they have a lot of Teslas that nobody wants to rent. They did this whole, remember, they have-

They have tons of Teslas they can't move. Well, when's the last time you ran? It's a shitty business in structural decline. Agreed, but I'm just saying they did that whack deal. Every time they try to give me one, I'm like, no, I shall not. And apparently nobody wants to rent a Tesla from me.

Anyways, it speaks to his brand, to Bill Ackman's brand, that he puts out a tweet of an insane thesis that makes no sense if you actually look at the data. So thirsty. Well, the stock doubled. You got to give it to him. The guy's brand clearly still means something in the market. But back to Trump. Highly emotional, creating enemies and agitator where he doesn't need to that will only reduce our negotiating leverage when people will put their own ego now, like him, ahead of actual prosperity and fidelity to

to their stakeholders and to citizens and to their economy. And two, a credible willingness to walk away, he imposes 145% tariff and then hours later says,

that the tariffs on Chinese goods will come down substantially, but won't be zero, then why the fuck did you go to 145%? This guy has, he is competing against people who are willing to starve millions of their own people. And he thinks he's going to intimidate them with 145. I meant, no, but they're going to come down. They're going to do, you're about, we're about to enter the stage where they try to figure out a way to

to basically somehow put lipstick on a pig here and call victory and stop all this nonsense. The tariffs are going to be remarkably similar to what they were before all of this nonsense, but you're going to have all these people trying to spin how it's some sort of great victory. And then the deals, they're coming to me for deals. They're trying to kiss my ass, that whole thing. And all we have done here- Stop, you're sad, pathetic. All we have done here is massively erode

brand America. It's gone from freedom, generosity, military might, prosperity, risk aggressiveness, opportunity, rule of law to toxic uncertainty. And that brand does not command margins. It commands negative margins. So what does he do? OK, look, first of all, Besson's trying to affect him, obviously, and he seems to have gained a bit of an upper hand against the two clowns, the clown show of

Howard, whatever his name is, and Elon. And there was an altercation, a very loud altercation between Bessette and Musk over IRS head, which the Treasury Secretary should pick, FYI, not Elon Musk.

He was trying to pick a sycophant to take over the IRS, where our money comes from. And what would you do if you were a besant right now? Like, besides leave, like, immediately, what would you do? Well, he's kind of already done it. He clearly leaked that interaction. And he's saying, I'm on top and I've had it with this guy.

Trump is scared. He's seen as, Besant is seen as like a sycophant, but is potentially the guy in the Oval Office that will take stuff off his desk so he doesn't even see it, that he is sort of an adult in the room. He has a reputation versus Lutnik that's just considered...

you know, a clown that is now engaged in full-scale corruption with his son starting a crypto company. Jesus Christ. I know, the crypto stuff. Just when you thought this couldn't get any more corrupt, Bessette is seen as a very credible guy and behind the scenes is basically saying, okay, I'm going to do my best here. I know this is fucking batshit crazy. This is, we know where this goes. Blink, blink, blink, trot.

try and run Vaseline over the lens of incompetence here and pretend this is a victory. I never made this mistake, and I'm not cleaning it up now. The tariffs are going to look remarkably similar to where they were before. And all that's happened is we have eroded our image around the world to the detriment of our- So what would you do? You're sitting in the Oval Office. He has you in. You, for some reason, go.

And he's listening to you. What would you say to Trump to do right now? If he would listen to me, I would immediately, I would pretend to have discussions, declare victory and leave. Just like literally find a country that's willing to do something for you, come up with a bunch of fake reasons for why this was anything but what it was, which was insanely damaging, and literally get back to the economy and try and repair as many of our alliances as possible.

and go on the mother of all behind-the-scenes apology tours.

Because this is going to start showing up in earnings calls. I think China might say, oh, you want to go back to where we were? Fuck you. You've been out banging hookers and doing blow and ignoring our children. Now you've decided you want to be married again? Sorry, boss. Sorry, I'll be at my sister's. It's a nice metaphor. Isn't it? Yeah. Anyways, speaking for a friend. Yeah, I think, I don't know. I think the Chinese and the

and the Europeans are now like, huh, what would a life without these obnoxious Americans be like? 100%. Like, hey, I think a divorce sounds great.

Like, I'm sure that's what they're thinking. Do you know what I mean? My tennis bro is texting me. Wait a minute. Just a minute here. My tennis bro's texting me. My friends are going to St. Bart's. That sounds pretty good. He needs to... Oh, what an idiot. What a fucking idiot. I mean, the thing is, if he did a couple of things, all his stupid followers would like clap, clap like the stars. Yeah, they'll pretend that it was genius and 40 chess. So move to that part of the program as soon as possible.

You, I mean, you literally have to put the fire out here. You have to put the fire out. But I don't know if he's... He wants to. He's been listening to Wall Street. Wall Street is the one that speaks with the truth. The adult in the room is the tenure. We've been saying that. Like, I don't, I'm glad Bessent is there.

But I do think the raft of them, I think we're about where I think we're on the cusp of a few of them being fired. Yeah, should go. What a thirsty. Well, not even he is. They most of them should go. But I think he's going to try and blame a lot of this on incompetence and saying, you know, I got some bad information. These folks did the wrong thing.

I've moved them out. He's going to throw a bunch of them into the volcano, if you will. Right. Yeah. Yeah. But they're certainly not going to tax the rich. That's for sure. Look, a step back from the wrong direction is a step in the right direction. So if you were really advising the guy, you'd say as elegantly, as gracefully, and as respectfully as possible, you need to stop this shit really, really quickly. And behind the scenes, say, call...

Prime Minister Carney and say, "Congratulations, and by the way, you're a fantastic friend. A lot of this was posturing. I want to apologize to you personally. What can we do that makes this better for both of us?" All he needs is affirmation. It's so sad. It's such a sad state at this age in his life that this is all he needs, but here we are. Anyway, Scott, one more quick break. We'll be back for predictions.

The spirit of innovation is deeply ingrained in America, and Google is helping Americans innovate in ways both big and small. The Department of Defense is working with Google to help secure America's digital defense systems, from establishing cloud-based zero-trust solutions to deploying the latest AI technology. This is a new era of American innovation. Find out more at g.co slash American innovation.

Welcome to Sephora. I'm looking for a perfume that's not too perfumey. I got you. Serum moisturizer or moisturizer syrup. Let's get into layering. My concealer is making me look worse. Sounds like the wrong shade. Let's get you meshed. There's only one store that really gets what you're going for. Get beauty from people who get beauty. Only at Sephora. Hi, I, uh, let's get you a basket.

Season 1 of Andor had critics calling it the best Star Wars series yet. Season 2 of the Emmy-nominated series is now streaming on Disney+. Follow Cassian Andor as he embarks on a path from a rebel to a hero. Starring Diego Luna and from creator Tony Gilroy, writer of Michael Clayton and The Bourne Identity. Season 2 of Andor is now streaming only on Disney+.

Okay, Scott, let's hear our predictions. You've kind of let loose a few during the show here. Well, this is always dangerous, but I'm going to do it anyways. Alphabet's reporting, we're talking Thursday, Alphabet's reporting at the end of the day. And I think rumors of Alphabet's struggles have been greatly exaggerated. I still think while ChatGPT is ascending dramatically and does present an existential threat to search, YouTube is just an absolute juggernaut.

And you talk about Waymo. I just think this company is so well run and Google continues to be the largest toll booth in the history of mankind. I think that they're going to beat and I think they're going to have I think they're going to beat expectations this afternoon because I think some of those expectations have been beaten down.

And then another one, I think in the next 12 to 24 months, we're going to see a spin prophylactically in big tech for the first time. And then I love- Pick one. Pick one. I'm going to pick. We'll each pick one. I say YouTube. Well, maybe the advertising. I think it's the ad business. Ad business, you're right. I'm sorry. Ad business for Alphabet. We would like YouTube, but it's probably the ad business. And then the most interesting one, and this is, I'm putting words in your mouth or taking your words, and I will credit you.

Tesla right now has, I think it's like a $750 billion market cap, right? And when you think about, essentially, when you're doing acquisitions or mergers, you want to do them when your stock, it's $806 billion. You want to do mergers when you have a really strong valuation because you end up, Steve Case sold AOL when he knew there was no way it was going to be worth a fraction of that in a

So that's when you sell your company. The problem is no one will buy Tesla for $805 billion, except XAI,

right? Or SpaceX. And so your idea is so interesting because what he could try to do is say, okay, jazz hands will only last so long. At some point, people start saying, okay, enough is enough here, folks. That $800 billion market cap is going to come way down. So the idea of taking a large revenue base, which you get from an automobile company, putting on top of it, the impression and the valuation of AI with the data set of X and

And also maybe some of the gross and Riz and unbelievable coolness of SpaceX, which would that would be a lot. Maybe it keeps that independent. But I think your idea is really insightful that the way to maintain that ridiculous $800 billion valuation is to cash it in now. And he'll have maintain a huge stake and potentially do kind of.

One that's going to 0.5 plus one plus one equals four or five. I think you're right. I think there's going to be, I think Tesla is going to be folded in to another or merged. Or an AI company that makes robots. Yeah, I just, I love that.

Because when you said it, the moment you said it, I thought, oh, that would be really fucking smart from a shareholder perspective. Yeah, it makes sense. It's also like him. It's very like him. He's hiding things. Very bold. And he has control of his board. Right, yeah. He doesn't care. He'll tell the board this is what we're doing. He's not scared of shareholder lawsuits. Well, I wonder if he'll take it private then.

then. There's not a lot of revenue in any of these things, right? Can't take it private. No one will fund it. Yeah, that's right. There's not a lot of revenue. Well, you know, I don't think the Starlink part, I mean, SpaceX is part of it. They have, they don't, my guess, they don't make that much money. They probably, and they've been hurt themselves, but I think they're very expensive to run that thing. And

I'd love to actually see the numbers from that. If someone wants to send them to me, I'd love to see them. I don't think they're wildly profitable by any stretch of the imagination. Finally, Cara, the geopolitical prediction. Donald Trump is having a huge impact globally, including what leaders are elected or not elected, but it wasn't the impact he thought he was going to have in the Canadian elections for

Prime Minister, my prediction is that Mark Carney of the Liberal Party is going to prevail. And that is after overcoming a 25-point deficit coming into the year. And why is the Liberal Party going to prevail here? Donald Trump, he has so pissed off

Canada and the Conservative Party nominee for Prime Minister is aligned with Trump and considered a more Trumpian candidate. Boy, has Canada turned off Trump. In sum, Trump has elected in my opinion or will elect Prime Minister Mark Carney of the Liberal Party and has swung the Canadian elections 25 points.

because of how repellent they find Donald Trump and the Conservative Party has been contaminated by Trump. So he is getting world leaders elected, just not the world leaders that everyone had anticipated or certainly not the ones he had hoped for. In sum, I think the underdog here, Mark Carney, is about to be the next prime minister of Canada solely because of the unpopularity of our American president.

Do you have a prediction? I don't. I don't. I predict I'm going to go to White House correspondent dinner parties this weekend. Oh, I was going to go, but I'm not in town. Why not? I got asked by a friend of yours to be their date, and I was really excited. She's totally cool. I won't say who it is. A friend of mine asked you? Well, a friend of ours. Oh, okay. Oh, yeah. Yeah.

You should have. Oh, I know who it is. You should have come. Emily Ratajkowski. Just saying. No, it's not Emily. Yeah, there's a bunch. Every single media company, like Axios is having something, Substack. It looks like so much fun. You've been, right? The part

Parties are fun. I hate to say it. Parties are fun. I'd love to go. I don't go to the event itself ever, but there's like NBC's having a party after the French Embassy. Ooh, the NBC party. No, it's fun. It's fun. I love that French Embassy. It's so ridiculous. It's so like end times kind of partying kind of stuff. The NBC party. Well, David Hasselhoff or...

Or Courtney Cox be there? I was wrong. I don't want to go. You have literally said nothing that sounds remotely fun. Let me think. Oh, UTA has a really cool party. It's really fun. Oh, I had that. You just take erythromycin. Oh, wait, I'm sorry. UTA? No, they're fun. They're fun. They're fun parties. They are indeed fun parties. And my friend Tammy Hadid has the famous White House Correspondents in her brunch. I'm convinced Tammy's running the CIA. She's running the CIA. She's so quiet, and then she'll pop up and be like,

And the president of Gabon wants to meet with you to talk about a shipping lane deal. And I'm like, what the fuck? Who is this woman? She has a famous brunch that's really fun. That's really fun, actually. Where did she get all her power? She's everywhere. She's everywhere. I couldn't get my visa done. I couldn't get my passport. And she's like, give me five minutes. And all of a sudden, like the...

The ambassador to Britain is calling me and sending me a car with my passport. It's like, who is this woman? Tammy Hadid is the queen of White House correspondent's weekend. She is. She's Michael Clayton. She's a total fixer. She is.

Seriously. She's also lovely. May I say she brings the best toys to my children. And went to Pitt. Went to the University of Pittsburgh. She did. She's from Pittsburgh. She was in Pittsburgh this weekend. She's the best. We love that Tammy Haddad. Anyway, so I wish you were here. We'd have a good time. I met Tammy Haddad before I met you. We were doing a conference together. I don't think I'd ever met you. Or I'd met you for a podcast. But we went to, I think it was South by Southwest. But I showed up and this woman came up to me and she was so nice and so on my face. I'm like, who is this very friendly woman?

And I said, and I saw, I saw, it was so adorable. In the back, it was in a makeup room. There was this little adorable boy asleep on the couch. And I'm like, I should probably pregame with Kara. And they go, where is she? And she goes, and then they pointed to the little boy. You were sleeping on the couch. You look like a nine-year-old boy. It was so loud.

I'm like, she can sleep here? I can sleep anywhere. That was one of my first images of you where you were just on a couch sleeping with hundreds of people around you. I love to sleep. I'm such a good sleeper. You're like Winston Churchill. I can sleep anywhere. It's so true. Anyway.

Tammy, that's great. She's very tall and she's got this great shock of white hair. She's fantastic. She's a fantastic lady. Anyway, Tammy, good luck this weekend. I will see you at the party. We want to hear from you. Send us your questions about business tech or whatever's on your mind. Go to nymag.com slash pivot to submit a question for the show or call 855-51-PIVOT. Elsewhere in the Scott and Kara universe, this week on Prof G Markets, Scott, who's on a tear, spoke with Ryan Peterson, the founder and CEO of Flexport, who was the founder

He replaced someone that he brought in from Amazon. It's a leader in global supply chain management about the impact of tariffs. What a great person to tap. Let's listen. If they don't change anything in this 145% duty sticks on China, it'll take out like mass bankruptcies. You're talking like 80% of small business that buys from China will just die. And millions of employees will go, you know, we'll be unemployed. I mean, it's sort of why I'm like,

They obviously have to back off the trade. Like, that can't be that they just do that. I don't believe that they're that crazy.

That's a great idea to do an interview there, Scott. That's great. I love supply chain stuff. I invested, one of my best investments of the last few years was I invested in a company called Zero 100, which was supply chain research. I think if you look at every- You like dull investments. That's where you make your big bucks, isn't it? Dull-ish. Quick lesson, quick lesson. When you're thinking about how to allocate and invest your most precious assets, your financial capital, and even more precious, your human capital, it's very easy.

ROI on the X side of the scale, sex appeal on the X axis. It essentially, the sexier the business, the lower the ROI. If someone wants you to invest in a members club downtown for artists and creatives, join the club, do not invest. If someone wants you to invest in software as a service for scheduling healthcare maintenance workers, if it sounds so fucking awful, you wouldn't want to work there, that's where you write a check.

Because anything that's sexy is overinvested, which drives down returns. The less sexy, the more return on your invested capital. Also think about that in terms of your career. If you're going for something sexy, you better get bright green lights that you're in the top 1%. Otherwise, find something boring. And this is what creates passion, mastery, artisanship, and be able to take care of your kids and your parents. I love that, Scott. So don't invest in Scott Galloway because he's dead sexy.

- Hello ladies. - Okay, that's the show. - Hello. - Thanks for listening to Pivot and be sure to like and subscribe to our YouTube channel. We'll be back next week. Scott, read us out. - Today's show was produced by Lara Naiman, Zoe Marcus, and Taylor Griffin. Ernie and her Todd engineered this episode. Jim Mackle edited the video. Thanks also to Drew Burrows, Mita Severo, and Dan Shalon. Nishat Kerouac is Vox Media's executive producer of podcasts. Make sure you subscribe to the show wherever you listen to podcasts. Thanks for listening to Pivot from New York Magazine and Vox Media.

You can subscribe to the magazine at nymag.com slash pod. We'll be back next week for another breakdown of all things tech and business.