The Big Beautiful Deportation Bill and Trump Vs Elon Round 2
43:40 Share

I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the post. So daily brief, it is completely free. It'll be one email that's sent to you every day. You can stop the endless scrolling, trying to find out what's going on in your world. We will have this delivered directly to you totally for free. Go to human events.com slash post. So sign up today. It's called the post. So daily brief read what I read for show prep. You will not regret it. Human events.com slash post. So totally free. The post. So daily brief.

This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare. A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran. This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobiec. Christ is here. Senator Doug Alligator Alcatraz opens to detainees today despite protests and a federal lawsuit. That's right. The ICE facility is on the side of a remote airfield in the heart of the ever

It's known as alligator Alcatraz. Very soon this facility will house some of the most menacing migrants, some of the most vicious people on the planet.

We're surrounded by miles of treacherous swampland and the only way out is really deportation. The Justice Department is launching a lawsuit claiming LA's sanctuary city ordinance is in part to blame for the violence. This lawsuit is about the supremacy clause and who gets to set immigration laws in the United States. Zorhan Mandami, who in his nomination speech said he will defy ICE,

AND WILL NOT ALLOW ICE TO ARREST CRIMINAL ALIENS IN NEW YORK CITY. YOUR MESSAGE TO COMMUNIST ZORHAN MUNDAMI. WELL, THEN WE'LL HAVE TO ARREST HIM.

We don't need a communist in this country, but if we have one, I'm going to be watching over him very carefully on behalf of the nation. The yeas are 50. The nays are 50. The Senate being evenly divided, the vice president votes in the affirmative. The bill as amended is passed. We might have to put Doge on Elon. You know what Doge is?

Doge is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon. Wouldn't that be terrible? But Elon's very upset that the EV mandate is going to be terminated. And you know what? When you look at it, who wants – not everybody wants an electric car. I don't want an electric car. I want to have maybe gasoline, maybe electric, maybe a hybrid.

Well, ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily here live in Washington, D.C. Today is July 1st, 2025. Anno Domini. Folks, we're sitting here. We're looking at all of it that's going on. We're looking at everything that's happening. The big, beautiful bill passing in the United States Senate. They have the votes. The

And there's some people who aren't too happy about the vote. And that, of course, Elon Musk, Elon Musk coming out and saying that he is totally against this. In fact, saying that he will work to primary members of the House who go and vote for it. And in fact, he's now backing Thomas Massey, who has been one of President Trump's proverbial supporters.

nemeses when it comes to these spending bills. And Trump, of course, is now backing different different challengers to Thomas Massey. I don't believe they've chosen a specific one as of yet. So this is the state of play on all of it. And here's where I come down. Here's where I come down on all this. America's finances are absolutely in tatters. The

the disruption that you see on the financial side is 100% true. However, there is a larger threat to the United States of America than an economic downturn or some over levered companies going under. And you know what that threat is? That is the threat of the mass immigration crisis. And the mass immigration crisis is the foundational issue upon which MAGA was established.

That's what President Trump talked about when he came down the golden escalator. That's what all of 2016 was about. And every single moment from that time till now has been about deporting every single last person who shouldn't be in this country back to where they came from, or at least deporting.

somewhere else. You don't have to go home, but you can't stay here. So whether it's Alligator Alcatraz or Guantanamo Bay or whatever it is, I don't particularly care. I just want them out. I want them out of my country. I don't want to give my kids a country where every single public place is completely overrun, just completely overrun by third worlders. I'm sick of it. I'm done with it.

And there's been too much time spent, I think, on side quests. Let's get back to the main quest, boys and girls. And the main quest is getting our country back to the country we were all born in. Can it be done? Yes, it can. Because we have Donald J. Trump on our side. We'll be right back. Human Events Daily. What America first truly means. Welcome to the second American revolution.

All right, Jack Pasopac, here we are back live, Human Events Daily, Washington, D.C. We're here. It's a muggy day in D.C., getting close to that 4th of July holiday, today, of course, being 1 July. Folks, speaking of which, let's lay down some breaking news. Did you ever notice how gold doesn't get much airtime until the system starts to shake?

Well, and here is the big news, and I can explain why. Starting today, July 1st, the Basel III global banking rules are now going to classify gold as a tier one asset. And that's the same status as cash or U.S. treasuries. It's a big deal. It means central banks can now hold gold at full value and treat it as core capital. They're not doing that for fun. They are preparing for something.

If gold is good enough for banks and governments as a backstop, it should be good enough for your savings or retirement. And this may be the moment we've all been waiting for. Gold could reach levels we've never before seen. Whether you've got $5,000 or $5 million to protect, now is the time to act. And I've seen a lot of companies come and go.

but there's a reason I partnered with Allegiance Gold. I am not just reading an ad here, by the way, folks. It's true. The Poso family are clients. So there's no pressure. This is great pricing and they have top ratings in the industry. They make it simple to move part of your 401k IRA or savings into real physical gold and silver. You may even qualify for up to

So folks,

There's a lot of people have a lot of ideas about this big, beautiful bill. And one of the issues that I have with it, frankly, is the remittance tax. Wait till 1%. No, no, no, no, no. Remittance tax got to go way up, way up. You got to raise that remittance tax. All the money that they're sending back to these foreign countries. Now, all of it should be taxed. It functions as a tariff because it keeps the money here at home operating within our own nationality, our own polity. But that being said,

It focuses on the main quest. It provides that money and funding and financing to the mass deportations that America and all Americans have been waiting for and petitioning their government for for years. Someone who I think it's interesting that we're going to talk about this because I'm going to bring on a foreigner right now.

to get in on this, and I'll explain why in a second. His name, of course, Dr. Charles Cornish Dale, but you may know him online as the raw egg nationalist. What's up, Dr. Charles? It's good to see you again, Jack. Great to be with you. So why am I bringing on a foreigner here when I'm launching this completely xenophobic anti-foreigner tirade today?

Well, I think you understand that I have a certain amount of insight maybe into America's future and maybe into the future of cities like New York. I mean, you know, we've been talking over the past couple of days about Zoran Mamdami and about what he might do to New York and whether New York is only just a few years behind London in terms of its basically degeneration into third world conditions.

And so you're this is very interesting. So Sadiq Khan gets elected mayor of London a decade ago, call it a decade. So he gets elected a decade ago. And now you've got this huge deterioration of London in that time frame where he's been mayor.

All of a sudden, we're seeing at the same time, New York City suddenly has Zoran Mondami, someone, a name that none of us have heard before. And I think that's kind of a similar trajectory from Sadiq Khan. I mean, had he been someone who was really part of the national discourse prior to that?

No, I don't know. I don't think he had. I mean, I certainly don't really remember him. I mean, I think he was a pretty low level Labour politician. And then he was put forward in the London mayoral race. The Conservatives fielded, I think, Zach Goldsmith, who was, who is the son of a former Conservative politician. But Sadiq Khan won. And

it's been all change ever since. I mean, London's been going downhill for a long time, probably for the better part of at least 25 years. And I think that's probably true of New York too. I think that the, you know, I mean, you had some of the decline

was arrested by Rudy Giuliani, you know, with his kind of very tough on crime measures. But actually, I think what, you know, what this fits into is a broader pattern of decline, but it's accelerating. And there's absolutely no doubt that crime in London is far, far worse under Sadiq Khan. You know, since 2016, Londoners are taxed.

Taxed more than ever. Sadiq Khan has brought in, for instance, fairly recently this ultra low emission zone tax. So now not only do you have to pay a congestion charge to go into the centre of London, you also have to pay this ultra low emission zone, this ULEZ tax, which is enforced with these special cameras that they've mounted on the streets.

So you're effectively getting like a double whack of tax every time you go into London from the ring road, the M25 that runs around London. Londoners are paying more and more for declining living standards. It's obvious. Londoners all talk about it. If you get in a taxi in London and you actually happen to have a British taxi driver now because a lot of them are Somali and foreign and they don't even speak English,

But if you speak to a traditional London cabbie, he'll say, "London isn't the same city. London is just going to the dogs." That's normally what they'll say. And it looks like, you know, 25 years after 9/11,

New York is going to have a Muslim mayor. And I think that that is not only indicative of trends in America more broadly with mass immigration, but also in particular trends in New York. You know, you've had New York flooded with migrants, these sanctuary policies. You've had a kind of soft on crime approach.

And New York has changed so much that now, yes, 25 years since 9-11, it's conceivable that actually you'll have a Muslim mayor.

Well, and this is what's interesting, too, is because you see this massive, it's actually a tripling of South Asian, so Indian, Pakistani, and Middle Eastern immigration to the New York City metro area has tripled since that time of 9-11. It's gone up and absolutely skyrocketed since then. And so people point out and say, well, wait a minute, you know, the

the exact coalition that Mamdani was able to put together, I said, well, it's not just all immigrants. I said, no, it isn't. But the effect of mass immigration has created a sense where, because I saw some other social scientists were kind of disagreeing with my analysis. They said, well, wait a minute, you know,

What about the blacks and Hispanics? Because they largely voted for Andrew Cuomo. And the point is, is you sort of got old New York versus new New York because he's able to peel off the the Gen Zers who can now vote. So you're 18 to 29. He's able to peel off your white theater kid liberals and he's able to pull off something like 80 percent of.

of the South Asian vote. And that's simply a coalition that's able to defeat the previous working class and, you know, with somewhat of a Wall Street backing type candidate like a Cuomo. So new New York is actually beating old New York. And this is very similar to what we saw in London a decade ago.

Yeah, absolutely. I mean, the demographic changes that have taken place in London have, like you say, they've pushed out old London, if you will. You know, they've pushed white English people, white British people out to the margins of the city and even beyond the city into neighbouring counties like Essex and Kent.

You know, you've seen a wholesale demographic replacement in the city. And of course, it's changed the politics. And so, of course, it's changed the politics in New York as well. Working class neighborhoods, working class voters don't matter. Class is a

class as a mobilizing force isn't key here. It's identity politics. And that includes, like you said, the white Gen Z and millennials. And it's important actually, I think, to understand that although white Gen Z and millennial voters haven't been put into New York through mass immigration,

their opinions, their values, nevertheless, have been massively, massively, I think, affected and determined by mass immigration so that it is, you know, so that you do have these sort of hipster kind of Bushwick,

and Zoomers who are all absolutely, absolutely crazy about Zohran Mandami. No, of course. Simply because he's a South Asian Muslim. It's almost like this is what they do. Interesting book that came out about a year ago about that. We'll be right back with more of the Raw Egg Nationalist on Community Events Daily. Talk about influencers. These are influencers, and they're friends of mine. Jack Posobiec. Where's Jack? Jack Posobiec.

He's got a great job. All right, Jack Posobiec, here we are back live, Human Events Daily, Washington, D.C. Folks, let me tell you something. RFK Jr.,

He's known, of course, for his sharp mind and his relentless energy. Remember the viral video, though, of him using methylene blue to stay focused, energized, and mentally resilient? Well, now you can experience those very same benefits with Recharge from the wellness company. This doctor-formulated nutraceutical delivers a never-before-seen combo of methylene blue, NAD, and PQQ.

Creating a unique formula designed to optimize mitochondrial function, improve energy, enhance mental clarity. Methylene blue crosses the blood brain barrier to enhance memory, focus, and executive function by increasing ATP production, the true fuel of our cells. It also works as a potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory, helping protect against aging and cellular damage.

And if you're looking for a real mental and physical edge, Recharge delivers. Get 10% off plus free shipping by heading over to TWC.health slash POSO and use promo code POSO. Feel the difference. Think clearer. Recharge. I want to get back in here with, we're talking with Royal Ag Nationalist, Dr. Charles Cornish-Dale about how these similar trends

conditions and similar forces that we've seen in London a decade ago that he saw and experienced in London are very, very similar to the pressures we're seeing in New York City play out today. And in many ways, New York is just a decade behind where London is and how this it's just this mass flood of immigrants will continue.

It'll change your demographics. It will change your politics. And it will change the character of your country because, of course, these will all be led behind it. And now this is one of the things that I've said when we talk about the big, beautiful bill. There's so many people who want to focus on the issues with it. And I say focus on the fact that at least the one thing that it does do,

And this is why I'm behind it so much, the big, beautiful bill. And I want it to become the big, beautiful law.

because it centers us back on the main quest, and the main quest is mass deportation. So, Roy, if you could for us, walk us through why it is that immigration is sort of the main quest, and if we allow ourselves to be distracted and spend political capital on various other issues, or I'm not saying they don't exist and aren't out there, but ultimately this one thing will alter or destroy your entire country if you don't focus on it.

Yeah, well, you know, there's been a lot of talk on Twitter about the big, beautiful bill, about the benefits and the deficits. And look, I mean, no, no bill is perfect. Every single bill that is passed, every single law is a product of compromise where you have to

weigh competing interests. You have to achieve some kind of consensus by making concessions, and that involves chipping away at certain aspects of an ideally presented initial bill. So we've had the remittance tax chipped down, for example. But yeah, this idea of

immigration being the main quest in MAGA is absolutely true. And people have been saying on Twitter, look, what do you want? What kind of America do you want in 30 years time? Do you want an America that has

a much lower deficit let's say, but is demographically a totally different country. So you don't pass the big beautiful bill and whatever effects the big beautiful bill might have had on the national debt, they don't happen. But you don't fund the border wall, you don't provide more funding for ICE and for DHS and deportations.

etc. So you get a totally changed America or in 30 years time, maybe you have an America that has a bit more debt, or even significantly more debt. But the demographic change has been arrested and reversed. And America is still then fundamentally America.

So I mean, I think that that is the best way to put it, you know, it's like, okay, you can reduce the deficit, but then you don't do anything about demographics, or you do something about demographics, which is, I think, the fundamental problem, because if America's demographics change any more, then America is going to be a different country, and the economic side won't matter. So yes, I mean, this is

Immigration is the main quest. It was like you said, it was the main quest when Donald Trump came down that escalator 10 years ago. It's always been the central MAGA quest. All of the other things are side quests. This is the MAGA agenda. And ultimately, look, you're not going to get a better bill than this, I don't think. Now is the time to fund MAGA.

deportation to fund the building of the border wall and to get all of these millions and millions of people out of America before actually America is changed for good and you can't do anything about it.

And there's never going to be a position or a politician like Donald Trump. He's never going to be at a position where he's at the zenith of his power more than he is right now. He's there. This is it. We are at the pinnacle. This is the pivotal moment that everyone has been waiting for. And yes, of course.

Politics is the art of the possible, as they say. And I'm here in Washington, D.C., and I can tell you that's definitely how it works on a day-to-day basis. But think of the Overton window shift from 10 years ago. You know, President Trump, he could only really, when he was Mr. Trump, real estate developer Trump, candidate Trump, could only talk about

a wall, but he would say why we need the wall. And he would describe the character of the people who were coming over. And the media instantly, and Don Lemon and CNN instantly attacked him for this, saying, how dare you even question this? Now you notice that

They talk about the treatment. They'll say, oh, you're sending them to alligator Alcatraz. Oh, you're sending them to El Salvador. But they don't defend the types of people who are here illegally because they've seen the numbers. They've seen President Trump win by winning the popular vote and winning this massive victory in every single swing state because Americans have.

Absolutely want this. And you've seen a galvanization of the American people as well. Fifty five percent support all mass immigration. It's done. Just final minute to you. Could you talk us through how significant it is of where we've come from in the last 10 years to get to this point? Yeah, well, like you say, the Overton window has shifted enormously.

when Trump took power in 2016, he was pretty radical, but nowhere near as radical as he is now. A huge amount has happened in 2016. He laid the seeds, he laid the groundwork really for what he's finally getting around to doing now, which is actually addressing the fundamental issue, which is mass immigration.

You know, he's been subject to incredible reversals. 2020, the stealing of the election. He nearly had his head blown off on national television. All of these things have, I think, radicalized him and pushed him, I think, to a position where actually he is really prepared now to do what is necessary. This is his second term. He doesn't have to run for re-election. He doesn't have to worry about, let's say, momentary...

sort of political advantage. He really can pursue a radical agenda. Roy, where can people follow you, brother? On Twitter, Roy Egg Nationalist, BabyGravy9. I have a sub stack, royeggstack.com, and my magazine is mansworldmag.online. And I've got a new book coming out soon called The Last Men, Liberalism and the Death of Masculinity. So watch my Twitter. Check him out. BabyGravy9, the raw egg nationalist. PhD from Oxford, folks. Right back up.

And Jack, where's Jack? Where's Jack? Where is he? Jack, I want to see you. Great job, Jack. Thank you. What a job you do. You know, we have an incredible thing. We're always talking about the fake news and the bad, but we have guys and these are the guys who should be getting policies.

All right, Jack, so here we are back live human events daily. We're here in Washington, D.C. By the way, I've got some other some other shout outs in the chat here. People talking about, of course, alligator Alcatraz down in Florida, really driving the news today. So a lot of people saying, though, as well, you know, what about the other states? What about the other regions of the United States? So we've been going back and forth. Let's see. We got the

Arizona Hotbox or the Arizona Rattlesnake Roundup, the Jersey Gridlock, the D.C. Swamp, the Philly Pen, the Texas Dust Veil, Tennessee Hollows, the Yukon Labor Camps, the Georgia Pit, Louisiana, of course, the Bayou Bastille, Hawaii, the Volcano Vault,

Oklahoma, the Tornado Towers. And personally, I love this. The Northern California Grizzly Gulags. I really, really, really am looking forward to the Grizzly Gulags.

I'm sure the Supreme Court will have a lot to say about all of this, but I wanted to get into some of this with the Supreme Court. And so we saw these decisions come out last week. And one in particular that's really got a lot of people talking, of course, was the back and forth between Katonji Brown Jackson and her dissent, as well as Amy Coney Barrett writing for the majority on this question of nationwide injunctions and

And a lot of heated words back and forth. Of course, Amy Coney Barrett running, I believe, the initial welcoming party for Katonji Brown Jackson and playing the theme song from Hamilton for her when she was welcome. So we knew we had to bring someone in to break all this down for us. So I had to get Will Chamberlain to your council for the Article 3 project. What's up, Will?

Not much, man. Before we get started, I do want to, since you were talking about alligator Alcatraz, I want to give a shout out to Florida Attorney General James Uthmeyer, a former colleague of mine, both in Florida and a former member of the Law Journal I was on, actually. He's a fellow Georgetown Law alum, so he's an absolute badass. You should try and have him on.

Really, really good dude. Good shot. He's done great work. I got to say, though, I've been watching some of his stuff lately. I don't think he needs the beard. I think he actually pulls off the clean shave and look better. Just my two cents. Just my two cents.

Just my two cents. We'll see if you can give him some feedback. I don't think the beard is bad. I'm just saying clean shave for him, I think it works. For some folks, JD, myself, the beard is better. President Trump, nah, he doesn't need the beard. James, go back to the clean shave. I think you work better. That's just my two cents. I think I see something going on down there on the Will Chamberlain chin strap there. Yeah, yeah, I got a little bit. A little bit of a chin strap, okay. So when we're looking at these...

This thing went just incredibly viral. First, it was Amy Coney Barrett's majority decision, or majority opinion, rather, that a lot of people saw. But then people even started, myself included, looking at Katonji Brown's dissent

And it was ridiculous. And some people think it was written by AI. I'm actually not sure. I think she wrote this herself in some extent. I mean, she's got slang in there. She's got millennial colloquialisms in there. I mean, Will, just give us the context. Is this the type of stuff that we usually see coming out of a Supreme Court? No, I don't think I've seen a more strident dissent.

ever. And I've seen, I've read some very aggressive dissents from people like Scalia, who was known for writing very pointed dissents, but this was extremely strident and flippant. And as a result, she got smoked in the majority opinion in very aggressive terms. And I talked a lot about this last week with a few people, but

It's not just that Justice Barrett put out this opinion. It's that six conservative justices signed on to an opinion that was overtly mocking of Justice Jackson's legal reasoning. And that really shows that, I mean, the bulk of the court basically just doesn't even take her seriously anymore. They don't think she's smart.

And that's not good for her because she's in the minority. So, you know, she's just going to get to write furious, weak, pointless dissents for the next, what, 20 years until the Democrats get a majority again? She won't be able to have any meaningful influence over the bulk of the court. She won't be able to pull them onto her way on a moderate case. If they end up agreeing with her, it's despite her, not because of her.

Well, and so and this is this is crazy, right? This is this idea that you would even have judge. And by the way, Will, so even though Amy Coney Barrett, she authored the opinion, the other justices, including Chief Justice Roberts, signed off on the on the on this. So they saw what she wrote and said, yeah, I endorse that.

Yeah, exactly. That's what I'm saying. They were willing to have her basic, have six justices criticized her dissent as not being based in law at all. Wow. And you have to go back to, I mean, what is her theory? Her theory is that the judicial power is basically unconstrained and judges should go around unconstitutional

unprompted by a case or controversy, unconstrained by laws passed by Congress or the Constitution saying you the executive are doing something illegal, stop it. And it's like that's not our system of government because that would place the Supreme Court above the executive and legislative branches. And we have a co-equal system of government with co-equal branches. And in the same way that the executive and legislative branches are constrained in various ways, so is the court. And

The court is constrained both by the Constitution and by laws passed by Congress and therefore can't actually do anything it wants, can't stop every instance of illegality in the executive branch because its own jurisdiction is constrained. And this is something where, you know, and I read through a ton of her dissent. I mean, it's it's actually kind of interesting because you could almost label this the no king's dissent, because that's what she kept trying to say over and over and over. Oh, America doesn't have a king. America doesn't have a king.

And then she cited Adam.

She cited Hamilton. So she cites Hamilton as this, who is, and I realized something. I said, wait a minute. This just goes back to my contention. These are all theater kids. They get all of their actual knowledge of history from media and the consumption of fiction rather than reality. Because one thing, of course, that they don't mention in the Hamilton musical, or at least not in any great extent, is that Hamilton, of course, Alexander Hamilton, was famous.

famously, a monarchist. He wanted a king. He was one of the people who was championing for this. And in fact, the reason that we have the Constitution at all is because the previous system, which lacked an executive, fell apart and collapsed. The entire point of the

exercise of creating the Constitution was to create a stronger executive, but also place it within the bounds of these checks and balances of the judiciary and the legislature. But, Will, in her nowhere in her dissent did she seem to have any even understanding of this.

No, if anything, she criticized it as legalese. I mean, I actually have her opinion pulled up. You know, I just, this, actually, you should just read from this because people need to understand what this dissent said. Quote, to hear the majority tell it, this suit raises a mind-numbingly technical query. Are universal injunctions sufficiently analogous to the relief issued by the High Court of Chancery in England at the time of the adoption of the Constitution? But that legalese is a smokescreen. I'm sorry, whoa, step back, step back.

You're mocking, and the whole point of her dissent is this argument, oh, we must force the executive to follow the law.

And then when the majority says, well, we also need to follow the law. Here is the law that governs our authority and exactly how far it reaches. She's like, oh, that's a dumb, mind-numbingly technical legalese inquiry. Well, then couldn't you say the same about whatever your criticism of the executive branch is? Like the executive could get up and say, well, yeah, the Supreme Court's making this argument about what I can and can't do, but that's a mind-numbingly technical legalese theory. I'm going to do what I want. It's internally inconsistent, dramatically so.

Right. And this and of course, you know, this this part of the thesis of the book that Joshua Lysak and myself put out last year, The Unhumans, Secret History of Communist Revolutions and How to Crush Them, was this is exactly what they do. They do this every time where they say this power is it's essentially it's akin to just sort of the meme of saying it's good when I do it and it's bad when you do it.

And it really just comes down to that. And, you know, I'm sorry to the folks who get upset when I say this, but this is why the friend enemy distinction exists in politics, that sometimes it's just these people are my friends and I like them and these people are my foes and I dislike them. And that's really all it comes down to. So I wish, by the way, that we could go back to the previous system and actually have this system of law and politics.

checks and balances and all this, right? But when you have people like Katonji Brondaxson and you have a significant and a non-insignificant part of this country, the MSNBC crowd, basically, who totally agree with her, they will completely agree with every single word of her dissent and they will be left scratching their heads trying to figure out why it is that they were slapped down in the first place. It's because they've just willfully and...

over a long period of time, had a completely fried mental model of the world. And I really do attribute this just to mass media and fiction and the mass consumption of pop history rather than actually understanding our true history. Of course, Will, this begs the question of, I mean, correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Katarzyna Brown Jackson Harvard Law?

Yeah, Harvard Law. Just because you got into Harvard Law doesn't mean you're all that sharp. I can speak as someone who went to an elite law school that I wasn't that impressed with a decent number of my colleagues. Like, just because you got into a good law school, even graduated from it, doesn't mean you have a good handle on the law. And this is really basic Constitutional Law 101. The law of standing is something you discuss in your first year of law school. The idea of constrained judicial powers is something you discuss in your first year of law school, and it's definitely something you cover in detail in

in a class called federal courts, which is something that anybody interested in clerking is going to take. So yeah, this stuff is actually fairly straightforward. And part of the reason

that I think the six conservative justices were so angry is that this is stuff a 1L would have gotten. They would have looked at her arguments and her dissent and been like, Ketanji, what are you thinking? This isn't even close. This repudiates the law of standing that our court has developed over hundreds of years. There are close questions in the law. This isn't even one of them. Is the Supreme Court's jurisdiction constrained? Yes.

Do we have to obey the Judiciary Act of 1789 when considering our equitable jurisdiction? Yes, because that's where it was granted. No kidding. No, and it's amazing because, again, you have a situation where people are pushed through and, you know, discontent.

Just going to have to say it, this is exactly why people were so worried and so concerned about the rise and use of DEI in hiring practices, in politics, certainly, because people were chosen not because of their ability to analyze law. Elena Kagan, right? She wouldn't be making arguments like this.

But but instead, we know that Joe Biden, when he was president and, you know, I've I've made I've made the argument that, in fact, she was not a DEI hire. She was an auto pen hire that and probably illegitimate because of that. We don't actually know who who dominated her in the first place and certainly who signed that commission. But but but the issue is, of course, that we knew that he said, I'm going to choose an African-American woman and then did so.

which is the opposite of President Trump, who came out and said, I'm going to choose the best person for the job, and I'm always going to do that. And he certainly did when he chose his Supreme Court justices, and he absolutely did with J.D. Vance as vice president. Jack Posobiec will be right back here at Human Events Daily. ♪

They said Gen Z would stay silent, that we'd back down, that we'd forget what's worth fighting for. But this generation remembers. We remember truth. We remember freedom. And now, we rise.

This is more than a conference. It's a call to action to reclaim the future.

to ignite a movement that cannot be ignored. Student Action Summit 2025, featuring the boldest voices in the fight. Charlie Kirk, Secretary Pete Hegseth, Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, Brett Cooper, Secretary Kristi Noem, Riley Gaines, Brandon Tatum, Jack Posobiec, Laura Ingraham, Megan Kelly, Greg Gutfeld, Tom Homan, Congressman Byron Donalds, Russell Brand, Savannah Chrisley. Join thousands of students, future leaders, and freedom fighters

This is the battleground of ideas. This is the student action summit. Register now at SAS 2025.com. All right, Jack, we're topic here. We are back live human events daily on real America's voice. The only place, by the way, incredible real America's voice coverage. Shout out to the team earlier today. That was there at alligator Alcatraz, Brian Glenn, uh,

Our camera crew, everyone who was there getting all the questions in a fantastic, fantastic job by the team who was there. President Trump, by the way, tweeting during the show, I just caught up on on some of his posts saying that, number one, of course, congratulating the passage of the big, beautiful bill in Congress.

the Senate goes through, says he's urging the House to complete it so that it can be done and you and your family can have it before we go on the July 4th vacation. The American people need and deserve it. They sent us here to get it done. It's no longer the House bill or the Senate bill. It is everyone's bill.

I like what he said down here. He said, to my GOP friends in the House, stay united, have fun, and vote yay. God bless you all. He said, have fun. Amazing. Will Chamberlain, we're back on. We're talking about the Supreme Court here. Katonji Brown-Jackson, this...

just ridiculous dissent from her. So for folks that are watching back at home, is there any real relief to this? I mean, I don't know if my little idea of getting her decommissioned as a Supreme Court justice is really viable. Obviously, impeachment is possible, but perhaps politically untenable. What's the real best case for the future of Katonji Brown-Jackson? Because she's quite young and she'll be there for a while.

Yeah, I think she'll, I think I'd rather have her stay on the court in a liberal seat. You know, we don't need, we need five. We don't need, we don't need nine. Six is in fact good because it gives us some cushion. But I'm fine with her being one of a minority of three discrediting and humiliating liberal jurisprudence for the next 30 years. I think that's great. You know, if there's going to be a liberal wing of the court, it would be better if they made arguments that were facile and frivolous.

and led people to understand, like, oh, these people aren't even serious and they would destroy the country if we let them have power, so maybe we shouldn't. So I don't really think there's a reasonable way to remove her. I mean, I don't think any Supreme Court justice has ever been impeached, so I do think we're stuck with her until she goes. But so long as she's in the minority, she doesn't threaten the conservative legal project because no one takes her seriously, so she can't even persuade moderates like Roberts and Barrett

to agree with her. Well, you know, it's amazing because, uh, and that's a brilliant point to, uh, uh, producer Angelo here, producer Fahs is saying that, you know, there's, there's value in having someone around who is always wrong. There's value because, because number one, and in some cases it's, it's more valuable than having someone that's either, either,

always right or sometimes right because here's what's interesting is that when you have someone who's sometimes right, as you say, they can persuade people, they can be smarter, they can be more skillful, they can persuade people to their position. But when you have the person who's always wrong,

You can always just do the opposite of what they say. You'll be correct. You'll have the right decision. So, so now going forward, unless she figures this out, which I doubt she, you know, she will become the person that for the rest of the justices, they say, it's almost like a poison pill. If she gets behind something, they say, Oh, wait a minute. Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. KBJ is on board with this. All right, hold on. Let me, let me reexamine my position. Let me recheck the logic on this one. I must've made a mistake somewhere. Yeah. Uh,

I think, you know, the deep irony, she might be the Washington general of the Supreme Court, right? She's just for whereas the six conservative justices of the Harlem Globetrotters, a little ironic under the circumstances. But that's I think that's her role going forward. Like she's just she's there to get beaten up on and be wrong consistently.

And it's really something, too, as well, where, you know, I think that the left understands this because I don't see anyone defending her. I haven't seen MSNBC trying to rally the troops. I haven't seen Rachel Maddow go out. Joy Reid's not even on air anymore, really. So she's not there to rally anything. Morning Joe hasn't mentioned this at all.

So I think they all sort of realize that this is a losing bet. And hey, we're not going to throw good money behind a bad investment. And we're just going to leave it as that. But unfortunately, we bought ourselves a clunker. And she's going to be there as a testament to technology.

the only surviving piece of Joe Biden's legacy other than the millions of illegals that, of course, hopefully Stephen Miller and Tom Homan will be working through and making short work of once they get the funding that they need. Will Chamberlain, where can people follow you and the good work of the Article 3 project?

Yeah, you can follow me at Will Chamberlain and on Twitter and follow the Article 3 Action Project at a3paction.com. We also just put out a judicial sabotage tracker. So you can check that out, I believe, at judicialsabotage.org. And by the way, from myself and Tanya, congratulations to you and Jordan. Just announced number two is on the way. So best of luck. God bless you guys.

Yeah. Thank you, Jack. All right. And folks, incredible day, huge wins for president Trump. We're getting rid of them. We're rounding them up, started alligator Alcatraz and then move them all the way out. Ladies and gentlemen, as always, you have my permission.