4/22/25: Worst April Since Great Depression, China Warns World On US, Hegseth Meltdown, Fired Antiwar Official Speaks Out
01:04:01 Share

Every morning brings a fresh new energy. And no matter what the day holds, we come to the Today Show for all of it. We get the best start to the day because we started together. Watch the Today Show weekdays at 7 a.m. on NBC.

We'll be right back.

Does this podcast make you happy? Of course it does. That's why you're here. But it only comes out once a week. For happiness every night, you need Adam and Eve. Yes, I'm talking about sex toys.

Hey,

Hey guys, Sagar and Crystal here. Independent media just played a truly massive role in this election, and we are so excited about what that means for the future of this show. This is the only place where you can find honest perspectives from the left and the right that simply does not exist anywhere else. So if that is something that's important to you, please go to BreakingPoints.com, become a member today, and you'll get access to our

full shows, unedited, ad-free, and all put together for you every morning in your inbox. We need your help to build the future of independent news media, and we hope to see you at BreakingPoints.com. Good morning, everybody. Happy Tuesday. We have an amazing show for everybody today. Do we live for the pound or no? People live for the pound. There we go. I still get to say it. We're fomenting a coup today. Yeah, we're fomenting a coup here over at Breaking Points. Emily is in for Crystal, who will be back tomorrow and on Thursday, so don't worry about that. But

But Emily, the people have cried out for an Emily in Saga show for a while. According to our records, it has been two years since the last Emily in Saga show. What a gift to everyone in the audience. Yeah. So it is a great gift that we do. So people can't accuse us here of not giving in to our audience demands, right? So the people demanded it and the people are getting it by plebiscite. So there you go.

I think the last time we did, by the way, there was a brick wall behind us. Yes, there was. Yeah, that's right. That was before the new set and everything. So yeah, look, you can see how far we've come. That's right. All right, what the hell are we covering today? This is the toughest part of the job, setting all this up. Tariffs. All right, tariffs. We're going to talk about tariffs. The worst April for the Dow Jones since the Great Depression. Yeah.

Not exactly a great headline there for the administration. We're going to talk about some of the movements in the stock market. Big dump yesterday of major stock indices, as well as some major movements by China, warning other countries not to team up with the United States. We're going to continue the coverage of the Pete Hegseth saga. There is just insanity going on. Pete Hegseth knifing his own staff in the back who recently were fired from the Pentagon.

We also have one of those former staffers, Dan Caldwell, speaking out on the Tucker Carlson Show, really giving us some insight into the knife fights that are happening in the administration over war with Iran. We're going to talk about Kirstie Noem. She apparently got her purse stolen despite having been surrounded by Secret Service agents. She had $3,000 in cash on her, just some very weird stuff.

that's going on and obviously also an insight into one of the top law enforcement officers in the United States. This is a topic I selected specifically because Emily is here with me. We're gonna talk about the Trump administration's efforts to boost birth rates here in the United States, focused specifically on motherhood, tax breaks for new moms,

medals for mothers that have more than several children. So we're gonna break some of that down. We're gonna talk about that fight with Harvard between the Trump administration and Harvard, a major escalating legal battle between the two. It stems from that quote, antisemitism fight, but it's actually become much bigger than that. And then we're very excited to be joined by FIRE,

the president of FIRE, who is going to break down some of the free speech attacks by the Trump administration. FIRE, Emily, probably the single best organization that's been consistent and principled on these matters over the years. Really, we always look to them for guidance. They've spoken up on very unpopular issues, popular issues. They don't care literally at all. So we're excited to speak.

And then also, I guess people are also getting their wish here, an AMA with Emily and I for our premium subscribers. So don't forget, you can support us at BreakingPoints.com. You can participate in these live AMAs and more. And also see Emily every Friday on The Emily Show. Or on The Friday Show, sorry. I guess we can call it The Emily Show too. We should call it The Emily Show. Should we call it The Emily Show? Yeah, yeah. I like it. I like it. All right. Don't forget.

If you can't support us right now and all of the new expansions that we're doing here, it's totally fine. Just make sure that you like and subscribe to this video. And if you're listening to us on a podcast, just go ahead, give us a five-star review, and send the episode to a friend. That is the single best thing that you can do for us. You can even pick your favorite episode. Emily, you know, what's fascinating in our podcast downloads is that there are –

hundreds of thousands of people who listen to these at the end of the week. They don't listen to them daily. That's really interesting. We have a huge spike on Fridays and Saturdays. I'll be honest, I don't get it. But I guess it kind of makes sense. You're catching up on the news. Is there a spike in any particular episode?

Like, is it Monday? No, yeah, like a Monday episode will boom on, like, a Friday. I'm like, I just, I don't get it. I mean, YouTube is much more, like, regular, you know? Like, after 48 hours or so, like, most of the people who've watched something are going to watch it. There are a few evergreen topics. But, yeah, these podcast listeners, man. I've been trying to understand these people for four years. I'll never get it, but it's okay.

That's super interesting. Yeah, we love you anyway. So if you're listening to this on Friday. Yeah, four days from now. If you're listening to this four or five days from now, go ahead and follow your instructions. All right, let's get to the tariffs. So massive sell-off in the stock market yesterday. Not one particular thing that seems to have set things off, but just still real signs of danger. Here's CNBC right around the close. Let's take a listen. Look at the markets, which are very unwelcome on this Monday afternoon. The Dow is down 5%.

1,270 points right now. So we're at session lows. And if we close here, it will be the 11th thousand point drop in the Dow's history. And it's the fourth this month. Now, the S&P broad market, here's what you need to know. Down 3 percent and down 16 percent from the 52 week high. We're about 200 points above the intraday low of 49.10 on April 8th. Keep

these in mind as people look for a retest and is that an entry point? The Nasdaq is the worst of the major averages, led lower by Nvidia and Tesla. Tesla down 7% ahead of its earnings tomorrow. And of course, check the yield on the 10-year because unlike many, most previous stock sell-offs, where you at least get some cushion here, nope, not getting it today, 440. This time, treasuries are being sold as investors sell stocks as well. Dollars down, yields are higher. Yeah,

Yeah, and actually the yield has spiked even more since then. We're going to get to that in a little bit. But let's go ahead and put this up there on the screen. The Dow is currently headed for the worst April since 1932 as investors are sending no confident signals. Quote,

will yield results soon enough to ease the strain. And Emily, that really seems to be a big thing that was dawned on the market yesterday and a lot of these investors is the fact that the Japanese talks went so badly and that the Japanese prime minister and their team left Washington with no deal. And then honestly, the worst signal was not just them leaving. It was the Japanese prime minister going to parliament

declaring we will not concede to all of the demands of the United States. They are actively countersignaling the Trump administration at home and, by the way, to great popularity, actually. The Japanese people, not very happy about the way that they have been treated throughout this process. There's been ongoing talks there with China and with South Korea, something Trump historically has made three countries, which absentia,

hate each other's guts to at least move in some solid direction as a result of the tariffs. And so I think as this begins to dawn on the investors and on the market,

They're seeing that Japan, which was supposed to be the checkmark, like that was supposed to be the easiest one to be done. And they're like, holy – we have 70 more of these trade deals that are supposed to happen in 90 days. They're like, this is just not going to happen. Like this is not reality. And then no signal yet from the Trump administration around any sort of cave. The more that starts to set in, I mean everybody celebrated that stock market.

bump after the 90-day pause. We are just a few, maybe 2%, 3% or something like that away from being right back to where we started, even before the 90-day pause where they initially wanted. The bonds, obviously, we'll get to in a little bit. But this is not a good sign. Yeah, I mean, this is maybe the worst sign because- I would say it's the worst sign. There's a counterfactual here where Trump actually is signing and inking all of these really good deals. And that sounds a little bit ridiculous, but-

It's possible, right, that he could be coming away from this with actually some significant progress in these negotiations with Japan, with places like Vietnam. It's entirely within the realm of possibility, but it's also the predicate for his entire strategy. His strategy hinges on being able to seal these deals, to seal them quickly, and to get good ones. And again, I think it's more likely than not,

It's always been more likely than not. That wouldn't happen. But it was always a possibility. Look, it was theoretically possible. It was always a possibility. What's interesting, too, is Charles Gasparino over at Fox Business just said today, quote, about 10 days ago, Scott Besson was telling Wall Street executives that he was making progress cutting trade deals with India, Japan, South Korea, and Australia, some of the largest trading partners. Quote, then nothing happened and the markets tanked.

So there's been a combination of a couple of factors. It's not only the lack of trade deals. There's also been Trump's escalating attacks on the Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. And look, I mean, I don't think Trump is empirically incorrect that we do need a rate cut, but it's really more about the signal that he himself would take like some of unitary executive power.

power over the central bank, which would mean that there would be an escalating fight and, most importantly, uncertainty. So it's not the fact that investors don't want a rate cut. They would be absolutely happy to do so. As we've already seen, the European Central Bank has cut rates. There's been numerous other countries that have done so as well. The dollar right now, by the way, is a disaster. The dollar is down to, I believe, almost every currency except for the Turkish lira. All-time highs, or not all-time highs, but near all-time highs with the European

euro, the Japanese yen, and a few other currencies, which traditionally actually were quite down. This is very difficult because even without tariffs, that means that these foreign goods are going to be more expensive for United States investors and importers that are able to afford this. That is not to even mention the other stuff that's happening right now in the markets. Let's put A2, please, up on the screen, because this really actually underscores a lot of what I'm talking about here, about the dollar weakness. Quote,

Trump trade offensive threatens America's financial primacy. And the rising volatility and the dollar weakness is raising fears for a financial realignment away from U.S. shores. And so this is the big fear right now, but the move away from the United States dollar as a reserve currency. Traditionally, as they were talking about on CNBC, you see bond yields start to go down, which obviously has major pressure in terms of interest rates, the Federal Reserve. But

But we don't see that. And so really what we're seeing is both a fleeing from U.S. markets and from the U.S. dollar. And so when you have massive uncertainty on those two things, as well as this massive pressure in the bond markets, you basically have financial uncertainty and pressure at all levels, at the consumer level, at the

equities level, at the bond level, and now at a currency level. In fact, I was just reading today that one of the largest foreign exchange of traders, like of currencies, has been margin called and has to basically halt all trading. And so...

There's, you know, I mean, look, I'm not shedding tears here for Forex traders. Oh, boo-hoo. But it's a signal, obviously, that the uncertainty and the, like, basically shock to the overall dollar is causing fundamental questions to be asked across the world. And I think it always just returns to why. It's like, if that's a result...

If that's a result of outside pressure, if that's a result of a hyper-intentional policy for de-dollarization across the world to make U.S. goods more competitive for genuinely good trade deals, a lot of people would be fine with that. But the problem is,

point is that within this vacuum of chaos where there seems to be no policy agenda, everything is basically at the whims of whether Peter Navarro is on the right building in the White House complex or not. That's when everybody is just like, yeah, I'm done. I'm hoarding cash. If you're lucky enough to have some, taking out debt. Or if you're a company, I'm buying nothing for the next

90 days. And, you know, the freight drop that's coming from China, it just still has not set in for people because you're not ready for like the price increase at Costco. You're not ready to go there and to see stuff that you normally would that's just not on the shelf. It takes a couple of months to see that happen. I mean,

And don't forget, the peak of inflation in the COVID era was 2022. Even though 2021 was marked by all of those increases, it was really after the invasion of Russia where we saw massive shock to the financial system, massive shock to the energy market, and basically a year of unchecked inflation that the government allowed to basically just happen, where all of those things culminated, where people were like, I am done with Joe Biden. And

And I'm really done with the overall U.S. economy. And they really never forgave him for that. And I think that they're really on track. You know this as well as I do, but a lot of people in the White House right now specifically are looking back to 1981. And they say Ronald Reagan weathered a temporary recession. The short-term pain paid off for him. He was able to, you know, muster the—he was able to mobilize voters and have a very successful return to the presidency. Mm-hmm.

This is very different from that in a couple of different ways, but just one important way that you alluded to. It's not about price. This is not just about price increases. This is about the availability of goods. This is about scarcity. This is about things changing. This is about the shelves changing, not just the prices going up. And I think to your point,

Not only is that not sunk in for consumers, I don't think that that has sunk in for the administration. And the uncertainty as leverage was always, again, if this deal were to, if this entire strategy were to play out successfully, that had to be very temporary. Yeah. Because it was good leverage. Yeah. But let's talk about the 1981 recession, because that's a very important point.

But why did Reagan get forgiven for the 1981 recession? Because it was a hangover of Volcker monetary policy. And thus people forgave Reagan because they didn't think it was his fault. And also Reagan was a really good politician at the height of his – literally probably at the height of his rhetorical powers in 1981 where he's like – you know, the happy optimism, the jelly beans. Yes.

and all that. And he's like, look, you know, he's like, we're going to get through this together. He was an excellent communicator and he was actually able to use that recession to eventually push a lot of major legislation. Now we can debate the effects and all of that, but that was a hyper-competent, in my opinion, team, regardless of whether you think that what they did was good or not. But most importantly, they were able to blame Carter for

and Volcker for much of what transpired from 81 and in 82. The Trump administration does not have that luxury. Already, America is like, Biden, who? They're like, who is that? I don't know what you're talking about. They're also asking the public to significantly renegotiate its relationship with consumer goods. It's not just about prices. I would say beyond consumer goods, I would say they're asking them to renegotiate the very terms of which they understood their economic

life. And like that is, again, you don't, there's, America, if we look back, like they're really only going to tolerate that in a time of war. Like, and even then people are going to get pissed. Which is also where Reagan was successful. Yeah, that's true. Because of the Cold War. Because we had the Cold War. Yeah. Very good point. You know, I was reading, I think it was a, during World War II, there was like a national speed limit of like 35 miles per hour to conserve gas. People hated it.

They were able to tolerate it because they're like, okay, we're in the middle of a war. But basically, like the moment that I think the Japanese surrendered, they're like, yeah, we're driving 50 miles an hour now. Okay, like the shit's over. Like, where's my goods? I need some serious return for four years of lack of food and of driving super slow, even though we didn't even have any highways or anything back in that time. So, you know, America's always kind of been that way. You're full of fun facts, Jogger. Yeah, it's always fun times, you know, over here.

Spring cleaning? Sure, if we have to. But we're way more into spring streaming. Finding something to watch shouldn't feel like a chore, so we let Xfinity's entertainment experts do all the heavy lifting. They drop hand-picked TV, movie, and music recommendations right into your social feed. New premieres, returning series, exclusive interviews, the top music playlist for My Heart Radio, and all the rest.

the must-watch moments. It's giving flowers and finales, fresh air and fresh entertainment. So take a break from those clean talk videos. Follow Xfinity on Instagram and TikTok for the best spring streaming picks. Does this podcast make you happy? Of course it does. That's why you're here. But it only comes out once a week. For happiness every night, you need Adam and Eve. Yes, I'm talking about sex toys.

It's cool. It's cool. You have earbuds in, right? Adam & Eve, America's most trusted source for adult products, has been making people very happy for over 50 years with thousands of toys for both men and women. Just go to adamandeve.com now and enter code IHEART for 50% off almost any one item, plus free discreet shipping. That's adamandeve.com, code IHEART for 50% off.

Every morning brings a fresh new energy. This is Today. And no matter what the day holds, we come to the Today Show for all of it. When things are tough, we talk about it. When there's something to figure out, we dig into it. And when there's joy, we celebrate it. Because today is where it's all happening. We get the best start to every morning because we start it together. Watch the Today Show with Savannah Guthrie and Craig Melvin weekdays at 7 a.m. on NBC.

All right, let's go to the next one, shall we? This is about the bond market. So to resurrect the Joe Weisenthal term, the bond market is the real deep state, A3, please. And what you're watching there is that the long-term bond yields are absolutely blowing out right now. And so, look, obviously, these things are variable. But as of this morning, we saw a 4.9 yield on bonds, which is like

on the 30-year bond at 4.9. Again, let's remember why this is important, which is that this means that debt servicing, interest rates, and all of that are going to be more expensive than

for the government. It also means that there is a either sell-off or lack of demand for the United States dollar and for our bond, the very credibility of the United States financial system and of the United States like

I don't even really know how to describe it because it is so consequential. Remember, it's the bond market that took down Liz Truss as the prime minister. But it's important just to remember that when you see that happening, it is a direct consequence

of the stated goal of the Trump administration. Because one of the ways that Secretary Besant was giving people a lot of cope is he was like, yeah, the equities markets, they go up, they go down, et cetera. But the bond market, if we're able to do that, because traditionally that's usually what happens during a downturn, well, that

That will be overall more beneficial to US consumers, to our financial system, for the US Treasury. But instead, they've had the exact opposite, which definitely indicates foreign basically fleeing of the dollar and of lack of confidence in overall US markets. So that's what a lot of us are looking at.

Again, uncertainty. And I think fluctuations we see yesterday were because of the... I mean, I would argue that a lot of it was a reaction to the tripling down of the attacks on Powell. Just because it creates uncertainty. Of course. I mean, and that's... I was talking with some people yesterday. I go, why...

Yes, because we saw like a three-something percent drop in the S&P 500. And there was, I mean, by the way, that's the funny thing somebody said. They were like, we're so desensitized that a single 3% drop is like, eh, whatever. I'm like, no, that's actually a lot. If you look over the, you know, if you look over the,

traditional time horizon, like this amount of complete up and down in a single day without any market reaction, without an announcement of bad earnings or a major policy announcement. And everybody's kind of just collectively like, this doesn't seem to be going that well. That's actually a really bad sign because it means that the slide can just continue. Keep in mind, we're recording this earlier in the morning, so let me take a look at the futures. Yeah, S&P is up by like 0.7%. I'm

It was like, you know, still down, obviously, from where we were whenever we began, even on Monday. And actually, you know, Joe Weisenthal, again, flagged something which I thought was absolutely harrowing for the private markets. Let's go ahead and put A4 up there on the screen. He says, quote,

Blackstone is now down 40% from its November highs and is now right back at its post-liberation day lows. Remember, this is probably the best run manager of private assets in the world. So just consider how your run of the mill private equity or VC shop is looking right now. You know why I found that so important is I'll never forget. So the very first person I ever spoke to who told me that there was going to be

major economic problems was actually David Sachs. And it was an interview, I think I did it with him back in early 2022, before even the invasion of Ukraine. And I remember him telling me, he goes, you know, VC valuations are down massively. And because this is the bleeding edge of the financial system, when we're watching like lack of liquidity and, uh,

overall just like lack of investment and VC valuations and all that stuff start to go down, that's usually an indication where the private markets are for where the public markets will head soon. And I would say maybe within three or four months, everything that he said ended up correct. And I was like,

Wow. So that gave me a lot of respect for some of the insight of where these private market entities can tell us about not only valuations, but also what future behavior will look like. So, you know, if you're Blackstone, you're down 40%, you have to start selling stuff like soon. You know, you're getting pretty close where if you're going to half your value from November, like you're going to have some serious pressure from your investors. And these people, unfortunately, again, I don't want it to be this way. They control a lot of stuff.

And so if they offload single-family houses that could have a major impact, if they offload – I mean they control so many major companies or stakes in companies. Or, and this is the worst possible outcome, what do these private equity goons always do whenever there is a downturn? They fire people. Cocaine. Yeah. Well, yeah, that too. Actually, no, they're not doing cocaine because they can't afford it anymore. That's right. No. So they're – what's legal cocaine now these days? I don't know. I don't know.

know Celsius they're drinking tons of Celsius but the problem that we see for them is when they have to offload and then they come in and they just gut these companies and you're again you see tiny little signs of this Southwest getting rid of seating right jacking up its rates trying to add first class you see already you know the

airlines are always a classic example of recession indicators. We're going to see many other businesses, which Blackstone, again, unfortunately, does control, along with KKR, all of these major shops. They run massive businesses that employ millions of people across America, or they own stakes in them. And as investors, they're going to put pressure on them to probably reduce headcount so that they can increase their overall share price. So I actually thought that that was one of the

the more important ones, and also the indication there on venture capital and on private equity. When that stuff starts to dry up, again, we saw major problems in our markets in 2022 and in 2023. Well, I just want to say before we move on, that underscores, I mean, that's why I think, again, this question of certainty and strategy, and you've been making this point all along, but there was, to your point about David Sachs having these insights literally years ago, there's a pretty optimistic

I think I was more optimistic than you when Liberation Day was being teased and rolled out because this is actually based on some very accurate and unpopular, I think, understandings of the United States economy. And so there was a way that with a strategy, with coherence, and with a sense of purpose and certainty, everyone looks like they're walking in step. This would have...

actually done something pretty interesting. They definitely would have always been short-term pain. Well, let me clarify. I was never not optimistic. I had a baseline level of optimism until that chart came out. Yeah, yeah, yeah. And when I saw that chart, I was like,

That's it. I will never forget it. And I was like, holy shit. Looking at that, seeing what the 50% whatever tariff on Vietnam, I was like, yeah, this is over. And then learning about- But they still could have recovered from that, right? I think they could have. They could have easily come out the next day and said, we talked to-

Vietnam overnight and came, but they, I think for me, it was that, you know, within hours we learned the way that the trade, that the actual calculation happened. And then when you learn that that level of care went into the stewardship of the global economy, that's when I was like, sell, you know, it's like the biggest sell signal I've ever seen. I was like, nothing that these people do really, they may stumble into something good, but intentionality or planning behind it. No, no, no,

And I think that's really – I mean, that's why the market's tanked as well. You know, a 10% universal tariff, again, I mean, I don't think it's a terrible policy. We could talk about it all day long. It's one of those where if it had happened, there definitely would have been obviously a market correction of some kind. But I genuinely don't believe it would have been similar to today where we have wild swings of up and down and up and down.

I can tell you this, 10% is still, even if you think that that's crazy, that 10% is still much more certain than the bullshit that we're dealing with right now. Exactly. Yeah, and that's the problem where they face. We're watching this all play out. And I mean, really the signal to me, it's not just about China, which we're about to talk about a lot.

and the level of care that they're able to put into the stewardship of their economy. It's watching the other countries have to deal with this, the US allies, the people that we genuinely do need, like the Japanese, the South Koreans, the Vietnamese, and to watch Xi Jinping get heralded

on the streets of Vietnam, you know, again, a country which is basically, you know, in a conflict with China over the South China Sea, which doesn't necessarily like, you know, they have complicated relations with them and complicated relations with us, but broadly a population of people which love the United States, even though we destroyed their entire country. It's kind of amazing, actually.

And then to see them immediately host Xi and Xi going to Vietnam and then giving a speech about aligning with China and then watching same in Singapore and many of these other countries, which these are very important to the future of the globe because 50% of global GDP will be there just in five years. And they feel deeply abandoned. I mean, all the stories coming from the Japanese are insane. They show up here in Washington in good faith.

And they're like, so what do you want? And they're like, well, what are you offering? They're like, but we literally don't know what you want. And, you know, you know, not just even culturally for them, they're like, this is a clown show, you know, in, in, in Japan, you know, in their business culture and all of that, when we just think about respect and

and certainty and consensus and who to trust. They have very well and clear defined avenues through which decisions are made. They, along with us, have no idea if they can even trust Secretary Besson or if they can trust this person or the US Trade Representative. And then they watch the US Trade Representative learn about the 90-day pause when he's giving a testimony before Congress. So if that guy's

sitting across from me, I go, you don't know anything. I'm not talking to you. I just want to talk to Trump. And then Trump makes him wear a MAGA hat that he signs in the Oval Office and put it on for photo opportunities. Yeah. Yeah, I don't know. I feel for them. I really do.

And it's not a joke, right? Because it's the future of their economy. It's the future of our economy. I was going to say that changes their own political calculations. Which is already happening. Yeah, there's a decent argument being made by Eric Kaufman, Matt Cotton, and others that what's happening is actually the undermining of global populism, which Donald Trump has tried to fuel, has actually like...

sought to build up. And because people are now responsive to their own economic needs at home, Canada is a really good example of this. With Polyev, you have to come out swinging against Trump. And so it completely changes the incentive structure. That's a great point. I hadn't thought about that, but it's exactly right where you're actually empowering more establishment forces in the European Union, in Japan, in... I mean, even Javier Millay is countersignaling Trump.

on the tariffs. Like, you know, you've lost basically everybody. Right. I mean, this guy is like, what, probably the most MAGA that there is in Latin America. All right. Last part here. This is just, this is too much. At the very same time, this is all happening for us. Secretary Besant, for some reason that is will remain completely unknown to me, decided to put out a lecture on his Twitter account of financial literacy and savings for Americans. Let's take a listen.

Everyone should care about financial literacy, whether you are a student with a summer job or a part-time job during school, whether you're in college, whether you're starting your career, or whether you are at the end of your career. Making good financial choices creates economic security. And look, it's fun. You learn about the markets. You learn about

how to properly allocate resources. And there's a big payoff over the long term for something you can do early in your career.

I couldn't believe that. You know, the tone deafness of this near billionaire secretary of the treasury at a time of financial stress trying to tell people about savings and financial literacy. It's like, why don't we leave that to Dave Ramsey? Okay. It's like, maybe. That's your real beef with it. Yeah, that's right. Is that they should have just had Dave Ramsey do the PSA. Yeah, they should have just had Dave come in. Listen, at least the guy is consistent. He's saying that at

all the time. Dave Ramsey's the best. Yeah. I mean, look, Dave is the GOAT, as longtime watchers know, at least from my perspective. But I just thought it was unbelievable to put that out. And it's just this lecturing and this hectoring about savings. It's like, listen, he's not wrong about the benefit of saving or learning financial literacy or any of that. And I totally support it. But now is not

the time to be putting out these types of public messages, basically trying to signal like everything is for you, right? You need to learn public markets. Meanwhile, I'm one of the most powerful individuals in all of American finance and I'm like screwing with the bond markets and all the nuking your 401k or your 529 plan. That's a good point. So best is like I can nuke your 401k with a

Yes.

Go full Ted Kaczynski and build a cabin in the woods because they can tank whatever you save for decades with a word. Bingo. But rather than fixing that structure, you should just pull the gold. In the words of Dave, debt is dumb and cash is king.

Spring cleaning? Sure, if we have to. But we're way more into spring streaming. Finding something to watch shouldn't feel like a chore, so we let Xfinity's entertainment experts do all the heavy lifting. They drop hand-picked TV, movie, and music recommendations right into your social feed. New premieres, returning series, exclusive interviews, the top music playlist for My Heart Radio, and all the rest.

Does this podcast make you happy? Of course it does. That's why you're here. But it only comes out once a week. For happiness every night, you need Adam and Eve. Yes, I'm talking about sex toys.

It's cool. It's cool. You have earbuds in, right? Adam and Eve, America's most trusted source for adult products, has been making people very happy for over 50 years with thousands of toys for both men and women. Just go to adamandeve.com now and enter code IHEART for 50% off almost any one item, plus free discreet shipping. That's adamandeve.com, code IHEART for 50% off.

Every morning brings a fresh new energy. This is today. And no matter what the day holds, we come to the Today Show for all of it. When things are tough, we talk about it. When there's something to figure out, we dig into it. And when there's joy, we celebrate it. Because today is where it's all happening. We get the best start to every morning because we start it together. Watch the Today Show with Savannah Guthrie and Craig Melvin weekdays at 7 a.m. on NBC.

All right, let's get over to the Chinese segment here. This is actually really interesting and does give us some indications about some thinking inside the Chinese Politburo. Let's put this up there on the screen. So there were two kind of theories of the way that China would react to the Trump trade war. One was after the 90-day pause, the Trump administration said that China has shown itself to be a bad act.

They said that their goal is to use the 90-day pause to negotiate reciprocal trade agreements with other countries to isolate the Chinese. And they specifically instructed the Chinese not to retaliate. Instead, what immediately happened? The Chinese were like, we'll match you dollar for dollar for every tariff. We'll cap it around 80% or whatever. We're going to stay there.

Even though that 80% is basically a secession of trade between our two countries. And in the interim, instead of maintaining any trade negotiation, there's been no high-level talks currently beyond anything routine. The Chinese are instead actually going around the world and instructing their foreign ministry to tell countries, do not team up with the United States against us or you will suffer.

the consequences. So this actually was a statement from the Chinese Ministry of Commerce just yesterday, quote, responding to foreign media reports that Trump administration was trying to pressure other countries on their trade with China. They said, "'Appeasement will not bring peace. "'Compromise will not earn respect.'

Seeking so-called exemptions by harming the interests of others for one's own selfish and short-sighted gains is like negotiating with a tiger for its skin. In the end, it will only lead to a lose-lose situation. China firmly opposes any party reaching a deal at the expense of China's interests. It said, adding that China would resolutely take countermeasures against any country which decided otherwise.

to do so. So what we are basically watching then is this like tête-à-tête where the Chinese are very willing to exert their own economic might, let's say over Japan, South Korea, and other countries, do it in a much more targeted and intelligent way. I mean, already watching the way that they have worked on the United States. It's honestly amazing. Like you just have to respect competence. They're like, okay,

Where do we have the most, like the single most leverage? Consumer electronics, so rare earth minerals, semiconductors, and on consumer goods broadly. So what are we gonna do? We're gonna prop up our consumer manufacturers to make sure that they remain whole. We're gonna pump money into all of our companies that we control. We're gonna rally the entire population around our flag because it's an externally declared trade war.

At the very same time, we will use maximum pained leverage on any country which decides to go behind the back of the Chinese state ministry. And we're watching countries that have to choose. So Vietnam, for example. Vietnam immediately caved to the Trump administration. They're like, fine, no tariffs, nothing. Don't worry about it. We still hit them with the tariff. What are they supposed to think? What are they supposed to do? Nobody knows. Well, our strategy was based on this idea that we had so much leverage that people would just come to us. And we saw that.

explicitly expressed by members of the Trump administration. They articulated that that was basically their belief. People will come to us because we have so much leverage. Then, like Japan, they can tell us what they're thinking and we'll let them know if it's up or down, good or bad, like the gladiator thumb move. But...

China, on the other hand, I think has handled this, and it pains me to say, with cohesion and strategy. And that's sort of the mirror image of the same noise. So rather than them saying, because we have so much leverage, we're going to let the chips fall where they may, which is basically our strategy. And again, it's true. We do have a lot of leverage. And the uncertainty, to some extent, at first at least, was, I think, a sort of clever use of the leverage. But China approached it with the exact opposite strategy, which is we're going to be

extremely strategic and extremely cohesive in our approach to these different countries and what they've seen, whether it's with Greenland or the EU or your point about Asia, it's just obviously working. And even watching some of the things that they're doing right now. So for example, I previously talked

about the Joe Weisenthal piece on private equity. Well, let's go ahead and put A7, please, up on the screen. Don't forget that the Chinese are major investors in U.S. markets. Now, do I think that that should have been the case? No, but it is the case. They have like 20% of our debt. Yeah, and so, quote, China is now pulling back from U.S. private equity investments. Industry executives report a change of approach as Beijing is bearing the brunt

Trump's tariff. So Chinese state-backed funds are, quote, cutting off all new investment in U.S. private equity in the latest salvo against Trump. State-backed funds have been pulling back from investing in U.S. private capital firms in recent weeks. The moves come from

pressure from the Chinese government. Some of the Chinese funds are also seeking to be excluded from private equity investments in any US-based company. Trump has imposed tariffs, obviously, of 145% on Chinese exports. Multiple buyout executives said that Chinese investors have changed their approach since the very beginning of the trade war, and they will make no new commitments to US firms. China's investment corporation, which is among the state-backed firms that is pulling back,

said that they were ceasing all investment. Quote, other Chinese funds have retreated. And this is the Chinese Sovereign Wealth Fund, don't forget, which has massive shares of Blackstone, of TPG, and of Carlyle Group, which means that, look, this is where the difficulty of stating this is that on the one hand, yeah, it's good. We don't really want these people to be investing in all of our private companies. Why should they have so much leverage?

private equity firms and all these, clearly they've been a tool of the Chinese ministry and all of them for years. But, you know, if there's no commiserate, like if there's no, you know,

like, change from the U.S. in terms of policy to make sure that all that capital that's no longer coming to our markets doesn't cause immense pain, then what do you think the net effect of all of this is going to be? Right. And this is, again, like, what we were talking about earlier with the David Sachs observation back in 2022 when you interviewed him. I mean, there's

This entire strategy is based on, I think, really accurate and, again, unpopular understandings of the United States economy, the structural flaws in the U.S. economy. And part of that is because so much of Wall Street was beholden to China and intentionally set themselves up that way. And the government sort of went along with it. Like American elites...

set the country up on this path. So it was always going to be painful to disentangle it. And so it's sort of for the average American, a damned if you do, damned if you don't, right? They're in this, they're caught in this catch-22 where elites set up a system where at one point where it was going to come to a head with China. And because of that,

You either have to stay completely entangled with China and completely beholden to China or disentangle a bit from China. It's pain for the consumer either way and elites will probably still be fine. They'll probably lose a little bit but they'll still be fine. Or maybe some of them will make lots of money, who knows? But it's such a shitty situation for the average consumer. And it's not even being, now that the disentangling is happening from people who are right that there needed to be a disentangling.

The normal person is just getting completely screwed. Yeah, and even right now, this just came across my radar. Maybe actually we can put it in post. I'll just go ahead and read from some of it. But Cambodia is, you know, I wouldn't say it's like a vital U.S. ally, but we actually do produce...

a decent amount of textiles in Cambodia. Literally just now, I mean, across the wire, Trump's tariffs, quote, risk pushing Cambodia further into China's embrace. Quote, a massive canal highlights Beijing's now deep investment in Cambodia, just as the U.S. is pulling back. So at the same time that Cambodia is getting hit with tariffs, and by the way, again, Vietnam and Cambodia were the destination for many textile manufacturers.

were told in 2018 to get out of China. Did the Chinese take advantage of this and use it as transshipping for control? Yes. Let's be very clear. Yes. Malfeasance absolutely across the board. But those governments are still a lot more friendly to the United States of America than the Chinese. And while they are, quote, "controlled" or they have some investment from China, it's not the same thing as literally being controlled by the Chinese directly like they were previously.

Well, at the very same time that we're hitting them with tariffs, what are they doing? The Chinese are like, here, here's $1.2 billion. Right? Here's a brand new canal that we'll go ahead and we'll build you. Basically trying to fill in the space from the United States. So anyway, just the last thing I want to say. The OG canal builders, too. Yeah, that's true. The OG canal builders. That's a good point. Before we run, Sagar, quick take on JD in India. Oh, interesting.

I don't really have a take. I mean, to be honest, like, look, first of all, he's the only, he's just the vice president, which is like, I don't want to be too denigrating. No, no, you're right. It's true. Like, you know, he doesn't speak for the administration in the same way. And there was just mostly like platitudes about working with India and the prime minister. Apparently, they're going to talk about tariffs. But the Indians drive, and this will not surprise you, in one of very hard bargains.

This is one of the most protectionist global economy or large economies in the world. It's actually difficult for people to understand. They like take protection. They invented protectionism. Like they take it to a whole other level. And for them, like they're not going to be reducing a lot of non-tariff barriers. The Indians are much smarter than us in some respects.

Because what they do is they'll do things which they know will cost them foreign direct investment. They just don't care. They're like, fine, as long as we control and have a total say over our government and our technology, we'll just do it. Yeah, no, but guess what? They have a population which is okay with that, and they at least have a financial system right now which –

because this is kind of baked in from the very beginning, is not going to cause as much turmoil. I mean, the TikTok thing in India is a perfect example. They were like, it's not a discussion. It's getting banned. Just ban it. And nobody really cared. Then they use alternatives now. I think YouTube Shorts is big in the country.

The idea that any Chinese major global manufacturer or something is going to have as much of a say over their affairs, they're like, it will never happen. Our own industrialists will run it. Don't get me wrong. There's a lot of corruption and stuff like that behind it. But they have a much more autarkic model than basically any other major economy in the world. And they have the population to be able to sustain it. So look, yeah, is it nice? Sure, it's great that J.D. –

and all that is over there, do I think that Modi is going to immediately come out and say, sure, we're going to lower all these non-terrorists? No, it will never happen. That's foundational to their entire country and to their ethos economically. They will welcome some foreign investment, but like the Chinese, they demand control. Remember, this is a country that banned Bitcoin and crypto because they want control over their own financial system. Try doing business in India. It's not so easy if you're a US investor. And that's why a lot of them don't do it. But

Like I said, the Indians just don't care. They have enough of a population. They're not as wealthy as we are. They're not as wealthy. But broadly, they see it as their fate to control and to really have a say over the industries in their country. I mean, who can't help but respect that?

So the speech, I was looking at it today. Yeah, it's good. But I mean, do I think it will usher in like a big change in U.S. relations? Like not really. Are U.S. and India relations? I don't think so. At least right now.

Spring cleaning? Sure, if we have to. But we're way more into spring streaming. Finding something to watch shouldn't feel like a chore, so we let Xfinity's entertainment experts do all the heavy lifting. They drop hand-picked TV, movie, and music recommendations right into your social feed. New premieres, returning series, exclusive interviews, the top music playlist for My Heart Radio, and all the rest.

the must-watch moments. It's giving flowers and finales, fresh air and fresh entertainment. So take a break from those clean talk videos. Follow Xfinity on Instagram and TikTok for the best spring streaming picks. Does this podcast make you happy? Of course it does. That's why you're here. But it only comes out once a week. For happiness every night, you need Adam and Eve. Yes, I'm talking about sex toys.

It's cool. It's cool. You have earbuds in, right? Adam & Eve, America's most trusted source for adult products, has been making people very happy for over 50 years with thousands of toys for both men and women. Just go to adamandeve.com now and enter code IHEART for 50% off almost any one item, plus free discreet shipping. That's adamandeve.com, code IHEART for 50% off.

Every morning brings a fresh new energy. This is Today. And no matter what the day holds, we come to the Today Show for all of it. When things are tough, we talk about it. When there's something to figure out, we dig into it. And when there's joy, we celebrate it. Because today is where it's all happening. We get the best start to every morning because we start it together. Watch the Today Show with Savannah Guthrie and Craig Melvin weekdays at 7 a.m. on NBC.

At the same time, Emily, you're now going to take a look at Pete Hegseth, where again, you know, there is a meltdown happening inside of the building. We've had a full-scale purge of many of Hegseth's top advisors. There's now some floating out reports that maybe the White House is looking to replace some of the, so Pete Hegseth and some of the people around him, which would be an extraordinary move. Hegseth is trying to save his job. He's basically putting all

all the blame for the purge on the people who were fired themselves, even though many of them are literally some of the most loyal people who have been around him for years. So he was asked about it yesterday at the White House at the Easter egg roll. Let's take a listen. - I wanna say, sir, about the signal chat controversy. - You know, what a big surprise that a bunch of, a few leakers get fired and suddenly a bunch of hit pieces come out from the same media that peddled the Russia hoax. Won't give back their Pulitzers. They got Pulitzers for a bunch of lies.

for a bunch of lies and on hoaxes time and time and time again. And as they peddle those lies, no one ever calls them on it. See, this is what the media does. They take anonymous sources from disgruntled former employees and then they try to slash and burn people and ruin their reputations. Not going to work with me because we're changing the Defense Department.

Putting the Pentagon back in the hands of war fighters and anonymous smears from disgruntled former employees on old news doesn't matter. So I'm happy to be here at the Easter Egg Roll with my dad and my kids because, you know, this is what we're doing it for.

These kids right here. This is why we're fighting the fake news media. This is why we're fighting slash-and-burn Democrats. This is why we're fighting hoaxsters. Hoaxsters. This group, no, no, this group right here, full of hoaxsters that peddle anonymous sources from leakers with axes to grind, and then you put it all together as if it's some news story.

And when we know it, we know exactly what it is. So I'm really proud of what we're doing for the president, fighting hard across the board. And I'm going to go roll some Easter eggs with my kids. Thank you very much.

Oof, that's rough. That man needs to be on Broadway. The level of performance was, he was like, I'm going to go roll some Easter eggs. I don't know, that sounds like an off-Broadway performance to me. Yeah, wow, there's a lot going on there. So, yeah, first of all, he's talking there as if it's a hoax.

Whether he shared this information in a group chat with his wife or not. I mean, it's not a hoax. It's just a reality. It's a fact. It's something also that you previously had said, oh, I never shared any classified information. Once upon a time, Signalgate was actually a story. But beyond that, what I find extraordinary about this is how he is just guns blazing against, again, top executives.

aides to him in the Defense Department who were the most loyal to Pete Hegseth, who worked for him probably for over a decade now at this point. - His friends, like actually his friends. - Like his actual close friends. And he fires these people on a dime. Now, people are saying that, oh, then he must have caught them leaking or any of that.

Look, there's no evidence to support that from the department itself. And also, even if you're going to fire somebody based on a suspicion, you better have some damn good suspicion or they could sue you for wrongful termination. All of the indication right now from the statement of those three

Never polygraphed, never presented with any reason or story for why they were fired. Unceremoniously marched out of the building. I think Hegseth is in some like bunker mentality. Like clearly he believes that he's just like massively under attack, taking it out on some of the people most loyal to him. His own chief of staff, who I guess is leaving but is technically still going to keep working for him, is a person he had never even met before.

before all of this, who was like installed, nobody even really knows by whom. Apparently he's been causing a lot of drama in the office around all of it. But my point is just like, this is not how the defense department can be run. Like again, we're talking about the tariffs. How can the entire world, you know, look to the stewardship of the largest military force in the history of mankind and be like, yeah, this is exactly the way that this is all supposed to be happening right

So, I mean it's just chaos. Well, it's against the backdrop of tensions with Iran mounting and so the question then becomes whether that had anything to do with Hegseth, his professional divorce from people who have been loyal, who have been around him for years, going back to when he was at Concerned Vets. And that's, I think,

where the fault line could be significant for Hegseth. I still don't really, I mean, I could be proven wrong by Donald Trump at any moment of the day, but I still don't really think Hegseth is actually going to leave. I think, you know, Mike Waltz was able to keep his job after we heard report after report that his departure was imminent and that never happened. And he's less important to the administration than Pete Hegseth is, frankly. He's the head of the Pentagon, even though he, you know, is acting very heavily in the spokesperson role, he's the head of the Pentagon.

So, yeah, I mean, at the same time, if his relationships with people who, for example, Donald Trump Jr. is close with Tucker Carlson. Tucker Carlson just had Dan Caldwell—we're going to talk about this later in the show—on his program for basically an emergency podcast to go over what the hell is happening at the Pentagon and asked Dan, did you leak, point blank, and Dan said no. Yeah.

So does that cause tensions that become a legitimate problem for Pete Hagseth as opposed to like a fake media story? That's why you saw him, I think, leaning very heavily into the idea that this was a fake media story when he was talking to reporters at the Easter Egg Roll yesterday. So that's messaging to Donald Trump, right? That's going straight to the president and signaling to him. Pete Hagseth knows this. He was on Fox and Friends forever. He knows how to communicate through the TV with Donald Trump.

And that's what he was trying to say. Mr. President, this is fake news. Right. And we actually got even more from Hegseth, where, again, he's just going guns blazing against his own staff, people who worked for him, who are loyal to him, basically calling them liars. Let's take a listen.

Over the last few days, your senior advisor, Dan Caldwell, Darren Selnick, Colin Carroll, who is your chief of staff, deputy secretary of defense. The other one, Darren, is now former deputy chief of staff for LetGo. Did you let them go? Right. It was a result of...

of an investigation ongoing at the Pentagon where we identified there was sufficient evidence, potentially, again, there's an investigation ongoing that will have to complete itself, sufficient evidence to believe that they or others near them were party to leaking. And then I have a statutory responsibility, Brian, if I believe that's the case...

to ultimately ensure they no longer have access to that and that the investigation commences. There are a lot of ways to communicate in this building. I do it every day. I was just doing it this morning. Official channels by which we communicate classified information. If you want to do it and do it the right way, you should. If we think you are leaking to the press,

That's a very real problem. We take that very seriously at the Pentagon. I'm here to do one job. One job for the president and the American people. Secure the country. America first. Peace through strength. I don't have time for leakers. I don't have time for the hoax press that peddles old stories from disgruntled employees. We should be talking about the decimation of the Houthis, how we're pushing back the Chinese, how we have a new defense area at the southern border. Instead, disgruntled former employees are peddling things to try to save their ass.

And ultimately, that's not going to work. I mean, again, I mean, it's unhinged, to be honest, the way that he's reacting to this. But clearly, there is some stuff going on inside of the White House. Right now, President Trump is standing behind Pete Hexeth, even though apparently he's not very happy about the latest signal story. Here was Caroline Levitt, the press secretary, talking about the secretary.

The president stands strongly behind Secretary Hegseth, who is doing a phenomenal job leading the Pentagon. And this is what happens when the entire Pentagon is working against you and working against the monumental change that you are trying to implement. Secretary Hegseth was nominated for this position because he is standing up for the war fighter, the men and women in uniform who are putting their lives on the line to protect our country and our homeland. And unfortunately,

There have been people at that building who don't like the change the secretary is trying to bring. So they are leaking and they are lying to the mainstream media. We've seen this game played before. The secretary is doing a tremendous job and the president stands strongly behind him.

The president stands strongly behind him, and yet at the very same time, let's go ahead and put B3, please, up on the screen. Emily, what do you make of this? From NPR, they're really the only story to report it so far, so you could take it only so far. The White House is looking to replace Pete Hegseth as the defense secretary. They don't have a ton of detail. It just says that there's something, the process of looking for a new leader at the Pentagon to replace him if they need to. The quote source said that Hegseth used Hegseth

signal messaging app on his personal smartphone. That's apparently what kind of set Trump off. But of course, Hegseth and the White House saying that that's completely fake news and that they're not trying to replace him. I'm just not so sure because when you see a complete collapse of your entire front office

You also find yourself mired in this controversy about not only sharing information, but just look at the way that he is speaking here publicly. This is not somebody who feels secure, right? He feels as if you have to go on the offense, survivability. The people around him, obviously, he doesn't even have any real advisors or any of that point who he could probably trust. He seems to be a man on an island.

That's a good point.

A lot of these people who were just fired are people who I think are being framed and who were trying at least to push the administration and develop options and policy, which would not lead to a direct confrontation. And things genuinely seem to be sizzling to a boiling point where the pro-Iran war lobby, again, is more frothing at the mouth than I probably have ever seen them.

I talked yesterday about Mark Levin demanding that Tulsi Gabbard fix US intelligence. That's crazy shit. Again, that's Iraq-level stuff, going and doctoring intelligence reports to back up what you want so that you can bomb them.

The purge here is happening. Ryan and I did our story yesterday about an Israeli ministry defense official running the damn Israel and Iran portfolio on the NSC. I mean, it's just crazy. And Mike Waltz gets to stay, the guy who wants to push for Iran. So Hegseth, if he stays or goes, I don't even know what this guy believes, honestly, at this point, when you turn on the people around you. He was one of only three voices to speak up against a strike on Iran. Maybe that's one of three gone, right? Yeah.

Turns out pretty well for the Israelis. Well, and Dan, and Tucker fleshed this out in his conversation with him, but Dan is a deep skeptic of the Iran hawks. And so there actually is probably something legitimate to the, I guess, there's probably something legitimate to the argument that Pete Hagsath is under enormous pressure from people who want to go to a war with Iran who are upset that he brought people like Dan into the group. Remember, go back to Signalgate. Who did Dan...

Pete Hegsa say should be the principal communicator brought in or the principal brought into the Signalgate chat, he sent to Mike Waltz. The Signalgate chat was created because Mike Waltz was asking all of these guys who should be the point person for your department.

Pete Hegseth said Dan Caldwell, and now Dan is out. So maybe there was some funny business going on. I mean, I think there's a non-implausible theory that Pete Hegseth was getting rid of these guys in order to protect them from an investigation. That seems to have been blown up by Pete Hegseth's own account of what's happened and Dan coming up

point blank and saying, no, I never leaked and going on Tucker Carlson's show. That doesn't sound like a guy who's being protected by a friend. It looks like someone who genuinely feels burned by all of this. And the other thing, Donald Trump Jr., to go back to him, he posted, you remember when John Uliot got some headlines for resigning? Well, Don Jr., remember, he said, this guy is not America first. I've been hearing for years that he works his ass off to subvert my father's agenda that ends today. He's officially exiled from our movement. Well, what does that say?

He's not the only one in the Pentagon who is working to subvert, as Donald Trump puts it, my father's agenda, quote, my father's agenda. There are other guys. He's one example. He's a high profile scalp.

There are other guys still in the Pentagon who don't like the Dan Caldwell approach and don't want him to influence Pete Hegs' decision making. And so, yes, they were probably doing from the moment the administration started and Hegs has surrounded himself by guys from places like Concerned Feds.

they have probably been trying to catch those guys doing something wrong or set those guys up. Nobody knows. For weeks, they've probably been trying to do that. And so, yes, I think it is likely that some of this stems from exactly that. But bad motivations don't mean that people are blameless, that people are pure and haven't done anything wrong. Mm-hmm.

So those are not mutually exclusive. Yeah, that's true. Look, I mean, is it theoretically possible you're leaking? Yeah, I guess. But I mean, you know, at the same time, like half of you people are leakers anyway. Or that Hexeth did. Sure, Pete Hexeth never leaked anything, right? Or that Hexeth was, to your point, disloyal to his good friends. Right. I mean, the pressure is going to make him do things or could make him do things that are bad. Yeah.

Whether or not he's inclined to do something actually anti-Neocon and smart when it comes to these mounting tensions with Iran, Donald Trump is resisting pressures from the Neocons so far. We'll see how that goes in his sending Steve Witkoff to continue these negotiations and the way that he's approaching it, which is freaking everybody out. I mean, it's freaking the Nikki Haley's of the world out beyond, like your point, beyond where they thought they could go.

Let's put B4 up there on the screen. So, you know, this is interesting. I rarely see this actually happen, but you have Representative Don Bacon here actually calling for Hegsath to go. He said that he has concerns about him from the get-go. Now, tell me,

Tell me about Bacon. I don't know much about the guy, but I didn't realize, I mean, this is a Hask person. He's a first sitting GOP lawmaker to suggest that he should even fire Hegsath. Clearly he's got a little bit of an independent streak. Is this in his general MO? What's up with this? Yeah, I mean, so he's had a close, he's had close elections. He's been, so he won his last election 51% to 49% in Nebraska. Yeah, so he's like,

Omaha area. And it's basically like one of the, it's a tough race for him. And I'm sure there's also a lot of

I shouldn't say weapons manufacturing, but I'm sure there's a lot of Pentagon business that matters to Don Bacon in Nebraska. Lots of nuclear business in Nebraska. - Oh, that's right, oh yeah, STRATCOM. That's right, STRATCOM is in Nebraska. I always forgot about that. - They're sort of economically tethered to the military industrial complex and in a district that is a bit more urban

and affluent. I never thought about this. That Nebraska would be so reliant on the nuclear weapons industry. It is true. It's actually true. She comes out and talks about how she's obsessed with nuclear weapons. Yeah. That's because, what is it? That's where the mountain is with the bunker and everything. I think Bush went there on 9-11. All right, anyway, this is a whole separate podcast.

Spring cleaning? Sure, if we have to. But we're way more into spring streaming. Finding something to watch shouldn't feel like a chore. So we let Xfinity's entertainment experts do all the heavy lifting. They drop hand-picked TV, movie, and music recommendations right into your social feed. New premieres, returning series, exclusive interviews, the top music playlist for My Heart Radio.

and all the must-watch moments. It's giving flowers and finales, fresh air and fresh entertainment. So take a break from those clean talk videos. Follow Xfinity on Instagram and TikTok for the best spring streaming picks. Does this podcast make you happy? Of course it does. That's why you're here. But it only comes out once a week. For happiness every night, you need Adam and Eve. Yes, I'm talking about sex toys.

It's cool. It's cool. You have earbuds in, right? Adam and Eve, America's most trusted source for adult products, has been making people very happy for over 50 years with thousands of toys for both men and women. Just go to adamandeve.com now and enter code IHEART for 50% off almost any one item, plus free discreet shipping. That's adamandeve.com, code IHEART for 50% off.

Every morning brings a fresh new energy. This is Today. And no matter what the day holds, we come to the Today Show for all of it. When things are tough, we talk about it. When there's something to figure out, we dig into it. And when there's joy, we celebrate it. Because today is where it's all happening. We get the best start to every morning because we start it together. Watch the Today Show with Savannah Guthrie and Craig Melvin weekdays at 7 a.m. on NBC.

Let's get over to Dan Caldwell's appearance on Tucker Carlson. Dan Caldwell, as we said, was one of the individuals who was fired from the Trump administration. Pete Hegseth, his former boss, basically calling him a leaker, even though Dan literally worked for Pete Hegseth and was one of the biggest supporters of his secretary, becoming the secretary of defense.

Well, here's what Caldwell had to say. Ask point blank. Did you ever leak any classified information like what is being alleged from the secretary? And what is behind your firing? So let's take a listen. It seems like the fastest way to derail the whole project, the Trump administration and the United States of America, is a war with Iran.

And that's why I've just been watching it as carefully as I can, because I feel like, again, if you hated Donald Trump and you hated what the administration is doing on immigration, trade, anti-woke, just whatever, and you wanted to stop it, the first thing you would do is apply pressure on

To have the U.S. military engage in a war with Iran. I mean, that's my perspective on it anyway. I think that and also continuing to do what we've been doing previously in Russia. For sure. For sure. Though it – I don't know why. I'm going to ask you all about this, but it feels like Wyckoff is –

is helping a lot there. God bless. I mean, I've already said he's a godsend. God bless Steve Witkoff. I couldn't agree more. People knew that you weren't fully on board with the regime change program. Is that fair to say? Yeah, I was very open about it. I was very on the record about it. And most of the time when I was saying that we shouldn't do this,

It was actually in support of the president's stated preferences. The president clearly doesn't want this. In the first term, there were people in his administration that wanted it. He clearly didn't want it. And so it was supporting people who didn't want the war. And so...

I was essentially Donald Trump had said, has said, and now his actions make perfectly clear he would strongly prefer a diplomatic solution. Correct. I don't want to speak for the president, but it's fairly obvious that that's what he wants. Well, he said it. I mean, he said it again and he ran on it.

So look, you can see that Caldwell is talking about Steve Witkoff. He's talking about war with Iran, about the preference for Trump for a diplomatic solution. But look, we can all do the math. Who's the person who got fired here? Who's the person who's on the – is it policy? I have no idea, to be honest. Basically, there's so much chaos that anybody can read so much of what we – anybody can read any intention into what's happening. But it just seems as if the collapse of the Pentagon front office –

Whether it is policy motivated or not is one where Mike Walz gets to keep his job. The neocons in the NSC get to keep their job. Steve Witkoff is basically safe for now. You have no idea if he'll make it or not anytime in the future because with the Gaza thing, he could be sidelined or he could be sent to Moscow with Putin tomorrow. We have no idea what the progress of those talks is.

is going to look like. And the forces within the White House and the administration who want more war with Iran are now countersignaling to protect Pete Hegseth. For example, Tom Cotton and others are some of his biggest defenders right now. So that's not a good sign. Not a good sign to me. But again, both of these things can be true, that this was driven, fueled by ideological differences, sharp ideological differences, and you have neocons, foreign policy blob coming hard after people like Dan

And then that pressure could have forced Hegseth to do something that probably was in response to it and not good. So I feel like both of that, I don't know, I think you're right. We genuinely don't know what's happening behind closed doors at the Pentagon right now. It sounds like Dan actually did not do anything wrong because I think you wouldn't go out aggressively in media and answer these questions point blank, talk to Tucker if that were the case.

And I think maybe Pete Hegseth fired these guys to protect himself. Yes. These things don't have to be mutually exclusive. Yeah. Look, it's certainly possible. I just don't know. I do know, of course, though, that with the absence of people like this, that power fills a vacuum. And so we know where that's going to happen. He was also pressed specifically on leaking. Let's take a listen to that. So I just want to be

Totally direct with you. Did you leak classified information against the wishes of your superiors to media outlets? Absolutely not. Did you photograph classified material and then text pictures of that material to an NBC news reporter? Absolutely not. And I have not spoken to an NBC reporter while at the Pentagon. Are you... Do you know what you've been accused of? No, I don't. Sitting here right now, myself...

And Darren Selnick and Colin Carroll, the other two individuals that were escorted out of the Pentagon, initially placed on leave and then fired on Friday. We have not been told as of this recording. One, is there what we were being investigated for? Two,

Is there still an investigation? And three, was there even a real investigation? Because there's a lot of evidence that there is not a real investigation. So you could see specifically, didn't leak classified information. And that was – people were like, oh, well, he didn't say he didn't leak at all. It's like, well, Pete Hexeth just said you leaked classified information. He said he didn't. I don't know. Maybe. But –

No polygraph test. Marks unceremoniously out of the building. Doesn't know if there is an investigation. Doesn't even know if there's an investigation. It had been cleared of investigation. No result of investigation. You still just get walked out. I mean, he was talking about how up until the minute before he was told to leave the building that he had access to classified information. Yeah.

which is not the way that this all usually goes down. And let's take it outside of Caldwell, those other two. I've gotten to know some people who know them, and they're saying it's preposterous that Darren Miller in particular would be leaky. He didn't even want to work at the Pentagon. Darren Selnick. Selnick, sorry. Apparently he didn't even want to work at the Pentagon, did so out of loyalty to Pete Hegseth, and now getting frog-marched out of the building. So again, you can take that for what you will, but...

Clearly the chaos inside of all of this, it's going to have a longstanding effect. That's all I know. Yeah, and we're going to, I mean, whatever anybody thinks they know right now, we will probably find out that either it's much more nuanced or that it totally wasn't true because there's so much going on behind closed doors. But it does sound very clearly, at the very least, it sounds like these guys got burned by a friend, not just a colleague, but a friend. That's exactly right. ♪

Spring cleaning? Sure, if we have to. But we're way more into spring streaming. Finding something to watch shouldn't feel like a chore, so we let Xfinity's entertainment experts do all the heavy lifting. They drop hand-picked TV, movie, and music recommendations right into your social feed. New premieres, returning series, exclusive interviews, the top music playlist for My Heart Radio, and all the rest.

Does this podcast make you happy? Of course it does. That's why you're here. But it only comes out once a week. For happiness every night, you need Adam and Eve. Yes, I'm talking about sex toys.

It's cool. It's cool. You have earbuds in, right? Adam and Eve, America's most trusted source for adult products, has been making people very happy for over 50 years with thousands of toys for both men and women. Just go to adamandeve.com now and enter code IHEART for 50% off almost any one item, plus free discreet shipping. That's adamandeve.com, code IHEART for 50% off.

It's Wednesday night after a long day, and the last thing you want to do is cook dinner from scratch. But you still want a satisfying, tasty meal without the guilt? Enter your freezer's sidekick, Cauliflower. From thin and crispy cauliflower crust pizzas to all-natural white meat chicken tenders and more, Cauliflower is gluten-free always, satisfies every craving, and is ready in minutes. Cauliflower is available in freezer aisles nationwide. Visit eatcauliflower.com slash where to buy to find a store near you.