Power, poise, and performance. From Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to Uber CEO Dara Khashrashari, Morning Brew Daily's had some strong leaders on the show who embody these ideals. For those leaders, there's the Range Rover Sport. Distinctly British in design, it has the capability to take on roads anywhere with the latest innovation in comfort and convenience like the cabin air purification system and active noise cancellation. Build your Range Rover Sport at rangerover.com slash ussport.
That's rangerover.com slash US sport. Good morning for your daily show. I'm Neil Freiman. And I'm Toby Howell. Today, the U.S. and China decide they don't want to break up. After all, Esther Perel, you did it again. And Trump signed an executive order asking for lower drug prices, but asking and getting might be two different things. It's Tuesday, May 13th. Let's ride.
I think
I think so, actually. I love the idea of a Wednesday movie because I also love the idea of a solo movie night. I've done one of those recently, and it just, I don't know, it's just a time for yourself. But I think AMC needs this. Their first quarter admissions revenue fell 11% from a year earlier. Outside the pandemic, it was their worst quarter.
first three months of the year since 1996. So they're pulling all the levers that they can to try to get people to come out. That being said, AMCCO Adam Aran said that their first quarter was an anomaly and they're already seeing people start to come back to the movies. So maybe you just need a lot of teenagers who love screaming chicken jockey rather than any big promotion to bring people back to the theaters.
And now a word from our sponsor, Iterable. Neil, you're in the dating pool. Ever try texting someone who only replies every third Tuesday? Nothing worse. Sometimes I feel like I got to send smoke signals in order to get a response. Even worse though, that's how most brands still operate. They're stuck in their own timeline. But your customers don't live on a marketing calendar. They live in the moment. They buy when they're ready, not when your Q3 campaign says it's
time. Iterable flips the script. Instead of pushing out pre-planned messages, it listens, learns, and responds, and does it all instantly. Whether a customer just opened your app, abandoned the cart, or heck, just ghosted you, Iterable's AI triggers the right message right then, no waiting around. Need to find me a date that understands that. Go to endthecampaign.com and meet customers where they are, not where your calendar thinks they should be.
It was Christmas in May on Wall Street yesterday after the U.S. and China announced a major de-escalation in a trade war that threatened to topple global commerce. Following a weekend meeting that could not have been an email, the U.S. said it would lower tariffs on China from 145% to 30%, while China will lower tariffs on the U.S. from 125% to 10%. Those new rates will be in effect for a 90-day period so that talks can continue.
And with that, the sell America trade that had been running since liberation day turned into buy America. Once again, the S and P 500 popped over 3%. The NASDAQ officially entered a bull market and the Dow gained 1,100 points while traders piled into the dollar and oil and out of
Thank you.
But we are glad to be waking up from April's nightmare. Over in China, they were almost as ecstatic as on Wall Street, touting the deal as a major victory for President Xi Jinping, who went 12 rounds with the world's top economy in the trade ring and held it to a split decision. What happens next is the big question mark hanging overall.
All of this. The U.S. still has 30 percent tariffs on Chinese goods, eight times higher than when Trump took office. And it's unclear what it would take to lower those even further. For now, though, a big sigh of relief for businesses across the Pacific. Yeah, still, the sigh of relief is coming as the U.S. tariff rate is now just 17.8 percent, the highest since 1934. So people are celebrating relief.
returning to literal Smoot-Hawley level tariffs right now. And the big question was, was this even really hurting China beforehand? A little bit. Chinese shipments of goods to the U.S. dropped 21% from a year earlier as a result of the increased tariffs. But then you look at where Beijing was sending other goods, and you see that their exports to the bloc of Southeast Asian nations plummeted.
surge 21%. So 21% lower to the United States, 21% higher. Maybe they were finding demand elsewhere. Obviously the U S is their biggest trade partner. So it's not a like for like sort of thing that all that being said, though, this does seem like a dream scenario because
Just a few days ago, Trump was suggesting that 80% tariffs was where things were going to normalize. 30% is obviously a lot lower than that. So all things being considered, you could see why it was a very green day on Wall Street yesterday. Yeah, let's talk about that. I mean, stocks that were exposed most to China and that had been hurt since April 2nd shot up yesterday. Apple.
Apple, which was the face of the trade war because they make a lot of their iPhones and other products in China, shot up more than 6%, which drags all of the indexes bigger because Apple is the most valuable company in the world. Williams, Sonoma, Estee Lauder, Best Buy, Lululemon, Nike were all up seven, at least 7% as traders sort of breathed that sigh of relief and said, wow, all these companies that we had knocked because they were so exposed to China are now getting
you know, we're sending them back up because things seem to be calming down. Yeah, the dollar and bond yields also rose as well. Now there's this expectation that the U.S. will grow faster once again now that these trade tensions have died. And if you look at the odds of a recession, too, on Polymarket, on Kalshi, those dipped below 40 percent from –
for the first time since back in april so it really is just i mean sigh of relief is the word that you keep hearing here because it it did come out a little bit softer than people expected like
this level of thawing was not necessarily something that people thought was going to happen when Scott Besant entered Geneva to do those talks over the weekend. So a lot of just people going, whew, it's not the worst case scenario. We're in a manageable position now. Let's talk about inflation and prices because they were about to skyrocket with 145% tariffs. What does it mean with 30% tariffs? Well, because of the
quirks of ocean shipping and how we get goods from China to the United States to our retail shelves. There is probability that there still will be inflation and price hikes because there's going to be a surge in shipping from China to the U.S. We saw a
huge amount of front-loading in March and April to get ahead of Liberation Day tariffs. Now, tariffs are still high. There's this 90-day pause, but they could go back up. We don't know. So you're going to see all of these containers. There are thousands and thousands of containers in Shanghai, in Shenzhen, waiting to come over to the United States that they had just not come over because of these massive tariffs. Now there's going to be a huge spree, and all that demand could drive up freight rates, which could lead to higher prices.
on shelves this summer and back to school for back to school shopping and holidays. So you see retailers being like, okay, this is great. 30% is still a big chunk of change that we need to pay. And also we're gonna have to pay so much more in freight rates, at least as this huge shipping surge comes across the Pacific over the next days and weeks.
Drug pricing has long been a controversial aspect of the American healthcare system, one that President Trump is targeting with an equally controversial policy. Yesterday, he signed an executive order that, amongst other things, brings back the most favored nation policy when it comes to drug pricing. Basically what we're doing, Trump said to the press on Monday, we will get whoever is paying the lowest price, and that's the price we're going to get.
The proposed policy gives pharmaceutical companies price targets to reach over the next 30 days, with the goal of ending what Trump describes as systemic overcharging of Americans. The data does back up what he's saying. The U.S. paid nearly three times as much for all drugs in 2022 compared to other wealthy developed nations, and over three times more for brand name medications, according to the Rand Corporation.
The pharma industry pushed back on the law, saying that any threats to their profits could impact the money they put into R&D to create new drugs down the line. Initially, shares of U.S. drug makers like Pfizer and Eli Lilly fell yesterday in pre-market trading, but then came roaring back throughout the day, mainly because the order cites no obvious legal authority to mandate lower prices whatsoever.
according to the New York Times. Plus, hours before Trump's announcement, Congress proposed $700 billion in health care cuts but didn't touch drug prices. So, Neil, not quite as toothy as some pharma execs were expecting, but it's clear Trump wants to try and bring the U.S. in line with other countries when it comes to drug pricing. The pharma industry was preparing for a bloodbath yesterday. I mean, stocks were down pre-market. They were waiting to see what Trump would do with this executive order.
order. They feel like bringing the like bringing prices down 59 percent, which Trump wants would threaten their businesses completely because they they use these profits to invest in R&D and they say this would lead to new medications that they could monetize. So they were preparing for the worst. This executive order
comes through the pipeline at 11:00 AM and executives and traders looked at it and said, wow, that's really not that bad at all. I mean, it's basically a kickstarting negotiation phase for 30 days. There's not a lot of legal precedent that they can stand on. So the pharma industry, you know, we said in the first story, they're breathing a sigh of relief
this executive order came down because it doesn't feel like it would impact them much at all. Let's talk about the motivation behind it, though. So Trump said that even though the United States is home to only 4% of the world's population, pharma companies make more than two-thirds of their profits in America. That is not a good thing. And drug makers do make a substantial amount of their profits worldwide from sales in the United States. They typically design their entire business strategy around the U.S. market. And so what are some of the outcomes if
suddenly most favorite nation policy does come into play. One outcome is drug makers just leave, facing a choice between making cuts to their pricing in the U.S. or the loss of super profitable or not super profitable overseas market. They might just leave some of those overseas market and just abandon them altogether, which obviously isn't a great outcome for the people living in those countries. And it probably will leave the United States leftist.
paying the same amount that they were going to pay, because if they abandon some of those most favored nations, then you're still going to end up paying higher prices to the United States as well. So people are starting to poke some holes in this, even though the general thrust of the order is something that a lot of people are actually aligned behind. Right. Economists are, again, sort of the price setting action of this, where the government comes in and says, this is the price that you pay for that free market
Free market experts are totally against that. But one idea that seems to be gaining momentum across the board from Donald Trump to Mark Cuban is this idea of going direct to consumer and cutting out those middlemen, those pharmacy benefit managers that have sort of drawn a lot of scrutiny from regulators for driving up prices. Those people that sit in the middle between the manufacturer and the customer and the insurer and manufacturers.
Trump went after them yesterday, this executive order, that no one really expected a portion of that was, you know, allowing and enabling more direct-to-consumer sales, which is what Mark Cuban has done with his new company with Generic. So we'll see.
if there's a further squeeze on those middlemen in the drug process in order to bring down prices. President Trump landed in Saudi Arabia today to kick off his first major international trip of his second term. And while any number of geopolitical crises are swirling around the region, this visit is focused on one factor.
thing, securing business deals. Over the next three days, Trump will roll through Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates to secure up to $1 trillion in investments from these oil-rich nations who've become increasingly influential in sectors spanning AI to sports and entertainment.
That the Saudis are getting Trump first is no coincidence. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman was the first world leader to call him after the election, pledging to invest $600 billion in the U.S. over the next four years. You know who wants a piece of that money? American CEOs. A gaggle of them, including Sam Altman, Jensen Huang, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Musk, will all be in the kingdom today, aiming to forge closer ties with these autocratic free-spending leaders who are going all in on AI.
So, Toby, we've got a very unusual first international trip by a president here. Less diplomacy, a lot more term sheets. Yeah, this makes sense given Trump's transactional approach to foreign policy in general, because in Trump's eyes, these states have a lot to offer him. One, they're pledging to invest literally trillions of dollars in the U.S. economy. That's been a theme throughout Trump's early presidency so far. They also pledged to spend a lot of money on U.S.
weapon systems as well. So this is a very carefully crafted strategy from those Gulf states to try to woo Trump to maybe get some extractions and benefit for themselves as well. So they are seeing this as almost like a once in a lifetime opportunity to have a U.S. president come in to try to land things like security packs that Saudi Arabia wants with the United States. So it's definitely a
a mutually beneficial relationship where they think they can solve a lot of win-win issues. Here's the question, though. I mean, this is a lot of money. Trillions of dollars. We know that these countries are rich, but can they actually afford it? And I think that is a question that people are asking.
are a little doubtful on because Saudi Arabia has launched these huge mega projects. We know they have this futuristic city of neon that was supposed to be, you know, online by 2030, but they're dramatically reducing the scope of that project.
you know, they use oil money to fund all these expansions into AI and other sectors. But oil has been in the dumps recently. I mean, the price of oil was $62 today compared with $77 when Trump took office. So at, at,
oil prices at that level, their bank account is shriveling up. So the question about whether these three countries can actually spend a trillion dollars and buy all these AI chips from Nvidia and whatnot is an open question that I think most people say they actually can't afford it. And it's in direct opposition to one of Trump's stated goals, which is to bring down the price of oil as well. So that is a point of tension between the two nations. But
As we saw him land this morning, it looks to be a very chummy relationship. I mean, they literally had horses escorting his limo as he entered, you know, the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. So definitely not a relationship that is too strained or too tense right now because clearly the two leaders get along. Up next, we have Toby Strands.
Neil, you know that one friend who holds the group together? Like when you're on a trip abroad, they've checked the weather, done the research, and know the currency conversion. Without them, we'd be lost, literally and figuratively. And here's the good news. Wise Business can be that friend for your global business.
Wise makes it easy for you to process payments, get paid, and manage your money internationally. Wise helps you manage your business's finances in 40-plus currencies, all with no hidden fees, no markups on the exchange rate, and no ongoing subscription costs. It's fast, too. Sounds like a business's best friend. To learn more about how you can use Wise Business to save time, money, and stress, visit wise.com slash business. That's wise.com slash business.
This episode is brought to you by Whoop. The all new Whoop is here. The only wearable that turns your health and fitness data into personalized guidance. Now 7% smaller and with more than 14 days of battery life. I just ran the London Marathon and Whoop was huge for helping me balance my daily strain while staying on top of my recovery. You can't get faster without proper rest.
and WHOOP's insights helped me dial in both sides of the equation. Now, WHOOP includes HeartScreener with on-demand ECG readings so you can check in on your heart anytime and share results with your healthcare provider. It also includes the HealthSpan, a new feature that demystifies the aging process,
and shows how your daily habits impact your pace of aging, as well as hormonal insights for personalized guidance through your cycle or pregnancy. It's the only wearable that gives you a truly comprehensive view of your body designed to help you improve your performance, longevity, and overall health. Join now at join.whoop.com slash brew daily. That's join.whoop.com slash brew daily.
So I know a lot of you guys listen to the podcast while on your commutes, which thank you. Hope you're not too stressed coming into work. But this edition of Toby's Trends goes out to all you remote employees out there who, even without a commute, are more stressed than you might expect. New data from Gallup shows that remote workers represent a bit of a paradox.
Fully remote employees are actually more engaged at work than their in-person or hybrid counterparts, with 31% reporting higher levels of enthusiasm for their work and connection to the organization compared to their hybrid and fully in-office counterparts.
Part of the reason for this higher engagement is that they have more autonomy over their workday, which allows them to use their time more efficiently. But a downside to that autonomy is that they are more stressed out too. Remote workers are more likely to feel negative emotions like anger, sadness, and loneliness compared to people who go into an office.
Nearly half said they felt a lot of stress recently, more than the 38% of onsite workers. And that's true controlling for how much money they make as well. So combine all that data and it shows how working fully remote can lead to higher highs and lower lows,
compared to going into an office or having a mix of both. So, Neil, thank goodness we're doing this podcast in person. Well, I'm still stressed, that's for sure. But, you know, CEOs are certainly paying attention to this report and they're saying, wow, a lot of my remote workers are probably super stressed and they're angry and they're lonely. I, you know, there's I probably need to address this to prevent them from leaving, because also in this survey, they showed that 57 percent of fully remote workers were actually
actively looking or passively watching for new job opportunities, which is a very high share. So you see that this stress and these lower levels of happiness with their job is actually taking a toll that might lead them to look for more work. I don't know if that is also in a remote role or not, but they're, you know, nearly two over half, almost two thirds of remote workers are actively or passively looking for a new job as a result of these stressors that they're under.
And Gallup kind of called out some of those stressors. A lot of them have to do with the fact that distance makes things more difficult for some employees. Remote work feels like just work because you don't get any of the friendship. You don't get any of the shared meals. You don't get any of the banter that you have with your co-workers as well. So that isolation can increase that familiarity.
feeling of loneliness as well. And then also I mentioned the autonomy piece, which is why there's this paradox, because if you do feel autonomy over your work and you can dictate how you spend your workday, you probably do get more done. You can enter a flow state more easily, but also that is stressful for a lot of people. There's a reason why, you know, not everyone is an entrepreneur. Some people just want to know what they have to do today. They don't want
too much ownership because then it feels like the whole world is on your shoulders, especially when you're alone. So that autonomy can be a two-sided sword as well. And then obviously too, technology is just frustrating as well because everyone's tried to been on a Zoom call before. It's not working and you just feel like, oh, why can't I just do these things in person? So those are a few of kind of the triggers that Gallup called out as reasons that remote workers are feeling these increased levels of stress.
Now let's sprint to the finish with some final headlines. Pack the Twizzlers and fill up the cooler with Mountain Dew. It is road trip time, baby. A record 39.4 million Americans are expected to hit the road this Memorial Day weekend to travel by car, up 3.1% from last year and the most in 20 years, according to AAA. Just 3.6 million people, on the other hand, plan to fly, which is up a mere 1.7% from last year.
The reasons people are channeling their inner rascal flats in treating life like a highway are plentiful rising economic uncertainty, higher living costs, gas prices near a four-year low, combined with flight prices and flight anxiety rising means a lot more Americans are hitting the roads. Neil, going to be a busy one out there. It is. I mean, I'm going to be flying this Memorial Day, but I wish I was driving because there's really nothing better.
than a road trip handout the window and one of my favorite games to play on any road trip is beat Google Maps ETA I feel like that's gotten harder to do I don't know if anyone resonates with this but maybe five years ago you could reliably beat Google Maps ETA by just going the speed limit and they change their algorithm to account for you beating them and now it's pretty spot on which is
which I get, but it's also quite frustrating. You're advocating for finding more efficient routes, not speeding though, Neil. Okay, good. I'm not advocating for speeding, more efficient routes, side skirting traffic. But yeah, they're on to me. Okay, if you own an Apple device with Siri, you could be in line for a small payment. Last January, Apple settled a class action lawsuit for $95 million that accused Siri, its voice assistant, of inadvertently listening in on private conversations.
Now the window is open for anyone with a Siri-enabled gadget to file a claim to secure their slice of the $95 million pie. Eligible devices include the iPhone, iPad, MacBook, Apple Watch, iMac, HomePod, Apple TV, and iPod Touch.
but you had to have bought and used them between September 17th, 2014 and the end of 2024. And you must live in the U S you also have to declare that you experienced at least one incident where Siri was activated unintentionally. And you were having a private conversation at that
moment. Toby, this might be the most helpful thing Siri has ever done. Yeah, news you can use right here. You can go and file a claim online. You're probably not going to get a hefty chunk of change because it's about $20 per connected device. So you can gather up to $100 from this claim. But that only happens if you own five Siri-connected Apple devices, which actually maybe a lot of us have. I mean, I got an Apple Watch and a computer in front of me, so I'm almost half the
half the way there already, but yeah, you can submit this claim. This kind of came through the pipeline with Apple denying everything, but wanting to settle it and just kind of get it out of the way. Cause this is not a massive number, but still something to, if you want a little nice dinner later in the year, maybe submit a claim and try to get your a hundred bucks. The Apple stimmies are coming and their website is Lopez voice assisted settlement.com.com.
So there you go. You can file a claim there. The Dallas Mavericks may no longer be the punching bag of the NBA. The franchise everyone has been making fun of for their inexplicable trade of superstar Luka Doncic improbably won the draft lottery last night, meaning they'll have the opportunity to pick Duke star Cooper flag with the number one pick.
The Mavericks had just a 1.8% chance to grab the top spot in the draft heading into last night, sparking all sorts of conspiracy theories. Toby, you buying any of them? I mean, let's just go through some of the recent draft outcomes over the years. LeBron leaves Cleveland. The Cavs get the first pick and get Kyrie. Anthony Davis leaves New Orleans. Pelicans get the first pick and get Zion. Mavs trade Luka, get the first pick and land flags. I'm not
saying anything. It just seems like any time a blockbuster trade sends one major superstar to another market, they seem to get the number one pick directly after. So again, I'm not saying anything, but you're just asking questions. I'm just asking questions here.
Speaking of basketball, time to reopen the GOAT debate because Michael Jordan is coming back to the NBA. No, he's not suiting it up for the Wizards, though. He could probably break into their starting five. He's been hired as a special contributor for NBC beginning next fall as a network who brought us basketball.
leans further into 90s nostalgia. Neil, NBC last aired the leak in 2002. Jordan last suited up in 2003. So they're trying to harken back to the glory days with this hire. I just wonder how he's going to do in the booth without Scottie Pippen. We'll see. I mean, I think this seems like a lower stake situation than, you know, Tom Brady calling games first.
for Fox in the football booth. You know, they really haven't given any details about how they're going to use MJ, but you're right. They're going back to the nineties with the theme song and bring an MJ back. And, uh, yeah, just everything about this NBC broadcast is supposed to evoke nostalgia and NBC also talked up their slate in, uh, next February, which they're calling the greatest collection of content that has ever been assembled by one media company. And that
It's certainly debatable, but you can choose for yourself. Have they seen the Morning Brew social media accounts? I mean, come on, MJ. Well, it's the Super Bowl, right? And then they have the Winter Olympics. And then, you know, this may drag down a bit, but the 2026 NBA All-Star Game, all in the span of 17 days. But Super Bowl and Winter Olympics, you're going to have a lot of eyeballs. And we'll see if MJ can drive anybody to the All-Star Game. That has just been awful the past few years.
Okay, let's wrap it up there. Thanks so much for starting your morning with us and have a wonderful Tuesday. If you have any thoughts on the show, send an email with questions, comments, or feedback to morningbrewdaily at morningbrew.com. Let's roll the credits. Emily Milliron is our executive producer. Raymond Liu is our producer. Our associate producers are Olivia Graham and Olivia Lake.
Garrett Peck is on audio. Hair and makeup can't wait to get on the road again. Devin Emery is our president, and our show is a production of Morning Brew. Great show today, Neil. Let's run it back tomorrow.