We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Presumption of Irregularity

Presumption of Irregularity

2025/5/6
logo of podcast Prosecuting Donald Trump

Prosecuting Donald Trump

AI Deep Dive Transcript
People
A
Andrew Weissman
M
Mary McCord
Topics
Mary McCord: 我认为将这些人称为“驱逐出境”是不准确的,因为他们实际上是被监禁在外国,这更像是“引渡”。特朗普政府声称委内瑞拉政府指导Tren de Aragua的说法缺乏情报支持。法院对Alien Enemies Act是否适用于驱逐Trinidad和Aragua成员做出了实质性裁决,结论是不适用。在移民案件和律师事务所案件中,政府行为存在不合规的推定,法官对司法部的行为越来越感到沮丧。 Andrew Weissman: 我认为Judge Rodriguez的案件是第一个实质性地探讨Alien Enemies Act是否可以被合理援引的案件。之前的案件,包括最高法院的判决,都没有触及Alien Enemies Act是否可以被合理援引的实质性问题。Stephen Miller的社交媒体言论与最高法院关于正当程序的裁决截然相反。法院需要确定Alien Enemies Act是否适用于TDA,基于总统声明中提出的事实。根据Alien Enemies Act,个人有权对法律的解释和合宪性,以及其是否为外敌提出质疑。

Deep Dive

Shownotes Transcript

Long established legal norms continue to be challenged by Trump’s Justice Department, leading Andrew and Mary to emphasize how the courts have grown increasingly frustrated with the administration's tactics. They begin with last Thursday’s ruling from Judge Rodriguez in Texas, that Trump was unjustified in using the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan migrants. After a review of what that means for his ‘extraction’ efforts, Andrew and Mary go deep on an assessment made public from the National Intelligence Council, that indicates despite Trump’s presidential proclamation evoking the Alien Enemies Act, intelligence officials do not see a strong link between the Venezuelan government and Tren de Aragua. And lastly this week, they look at the latest judicial pushback on Trump’s attempts to threaten law firms, after Judge Beryl Howell ruled against his targeting of Perkins Coie by executive order.

Further reading: Here is the assessment from the National Intelligence Council) on the relationship between the Maduro government and Tren de Aragua, courtesy of the New York Times.

Want to listen to this show without ads? Sign up for MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts.