Colorado TERRORIST Charged With MURDER, Was ILLEGAL Let In By BIDEN Admin
01:13:58 Share

In the past two months, we've had the firebombing of the governor's mansion in Pennsylvania. We've had two staffers working for the Israeli embassy gunned down in D.C. And now we have a man in Boulder, Colorado, with some kind of makeshift flamethrower. He's holding what appears to be Molotov cocktails set. I believe the number right now is eight people on fire.

These individuals had been holding regular peaceful protests to bring awareness to the Israeli hostages that are currently still held by Hamas. This man yelling free Palestine set them on fire and he has now been charged with murder, which implies, though we haven't gotten official confirmation, that at least one person that he immolated has died. It's getting crazy.

We have a serious far left violence problem, and we've had this problem for a long time. But the NGOs and even the Trump administration in his first term would not address it. Now, to be fair, to be fair, Trump, of course, does. But as a government, Trump employed some bad people, namely Comey, maybe now.

We will actually see some action taken regarding the rise of far left extremist terror in this country, which has been ongoing for quite some time. We're learning now this man was here illegally. He had come in during the Biden administration, and I believe he overstayed his visa and was not removed.

screaming free Palestine and among other things, saying that they have to take action. You know, the anti-Israel, anti-Zionist faction, they have to do things like this. That's what he was screaming. It's rather nightmarish, if you ask me. And to me, it's just crazy that this this conflict in the Middle East is is is on the ground here in the United States, that these people are violent extremists. And I can't say that I'm surprised in the least bit.

Now, I already know what the anti-Israel people are going to be saying, because many of them, not all, are irrational. Not actually friends with and fans of many people who are critical of Israel, and you're allowed to be. And they do want some heavy-handed political action to stop Israel's war in Gaza, expansion in the West Bank. And they don't believe the U.S. should be funding this.

But there's a big difference between the people who believe all of the worst things about Israel, and that you're allowed to, and those on the ground who set people on fire, beat, and murder. And you know what? The terrifying thing is they exist. And what they're already saying, it's false flag, it's fake. They're claiming it's Mossad, that the Israelis set this man up to do this to garner sympathy. We've seen the overlap between Antifa

And the anti-Israel faction. And again, I stress to say, not everybody, like Dave Smith is not going out there firebombing anybody. The anti-Zionist, anti-Israel people are not all this crazy. But in the far left faction, we know that Antifa black bloc violence has been persistent for a long time. The far left has been violent forever. And now we're seeing just how far it goes, at least for now.

The Wall Street Journal reports suspect in Colorado flamethrower attack charged with murder. FBI investigating the downtown Boulder attack as an act of terror against a group advocating for the release of hostages in Gaza. They say a man who used a flamethrower to attack a group in Boulder that was advocating the release of hostages has been charged with first degree murder.

Eight people were taken to area hospital Sunday in an attack the FBI is investigating as an act of terror. Police didn't give any details on the status of the victims. The incident occurred around 1.30 p.m. local time near the courthouse in a pedestrian area crowded with people, Boulder Police Chief Stephen Redfern said. Witnesses heard a man yell, free Palestine, as he used a makeshift flamethrower and threw an incendiary device, the authority said.

Mohammed Sabri Solomon, who was arrested at the scene and treated at a hospital for minor injuries, was charged late Sunday with murder in the first degree and other charges, according to court records. The police believe the suspect, age 45 and from El Paso County, was working alone. I love that one. From El Paso County. You know, I would just say from Egypt and living in El Paso County. But you get it.

Run for their lives. A group that aims to bring attention to the hostages taken from Israel by Hamas was holding a regular event at the Pearl Street Mall when the attack occurred. Group member Jean Unger told the Wall Street Journal the Boulder chapter of the organization follows the same route for what it calls peace walks. Unger said it isn't unusual for the group of 25 to 30 participants to cross paths with protesters, but the walkers don't engage with them, Unger said. When she heard shouting of free Palestine, she didn't pay immediate attention.

Next thing I saw was big flames from behind me. There was a woman on fire and people rushing to try and help her. And other people had flames on their legs, Unger said. She said several members in her group were injured, including one who was a Holocaust survivor. Four women and four men ranging in age from 52 to 88 were being treated at hospitals, authorities said.

Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Kash Patel said on Sunday the agency was investigating the incident as a targeted terrorist attack. Anxiety about violence in the U.S. stemming from the Hamas-Israeli conflict has been high since last month when a man who also shouted free Palestine fatally shot two Israeli embassy staffers near a Jewish museum in Washington. The young woman who was killed...

She was trying to crawl away from this guy as he kept screaming and shooting her. These people are dangerous psychopaths. I am sick of having to live like this. Look, I'm not going to act like we have more violence than some of the worst countries in the world. I'm not going to act like everywhere you go all the time, you're looking over your shoulder. What I am sick of is the news stories, and I am sick of the increase in political violence everywhere.

But I don't know what you do about the hyperpolarization. I don't have answers. I'm not omniscient. I can only tell you that it is happening. It's getting worse. These people are deranged. I ask you this. What was accomplished by this man? They're going to say, quote,

This is the second violent attack on the U.S. Jewish community in two weeks, said Anti-Defamation League Chief Executive Jonathan Greenblatt. Two peaceful Jewish events that ended with rage-filled violent attacks. Well, maybe if you, Jonathan Greenblatt, didn't try, I don't know, the better part of a decade to censor people's political opinions, actually were supportive of Donald Trump and pushed back against this violence, maybe then,

We could have pushed back on this polarization. I despise the ADL and their scumbags because the people who oppose this violence, the people who are calling it out, were largely the people being censored because of him claiming they were white supremacists. Not him personally, but his organization. Bill Malugan on X.

Three senior DHS sources tell Fox News the Boulder terror suspect is an Egyptian national in the U.S. illegally as a visa overstay who entered the U.S. during the Biden administration. I'm told Mohammed Sabri Solomon arrived at LAX on 8-27-22 on a B-1-B-2 non-immigrant visa with an authorized stay through 2-26-23, but he overstayed and never left.

I'm told on September 29, 22, he filed some sort of some sort of claim with USCIS, potentially an asylum claim. And on March 29, 23, USCIS under Biden Edmund gave him work authorization, which expired in March of this year. They keep letting them in. They let them stay. And this is what we've been warned about. I was speaking with Secretary Noem and a question that I had that literally everybody's been asking.

With the open borders policy of the Biden administration, are there terrorists in this country right now that we should be worried about? She said, yes, indeed, there are. And this is the nightmare scenario. This is just one of them. Now, I've heard that one of the individuals who was burned was a Holocaust survivor. I'm not entirely sure if that's been verified that she was a small child during the Holocaust and had come to the United States. I don't know for sure.

The Boulder, Colorado government has more information about how it went down. On June 1st at 1.26 p.m., Boulder police were called to the outdoor street mall for a report of an attack on a group of individuals. They rushed to the scene and arrested the suspect at 1.32. Look at this. They call, I'm so sick of this. They say he's from El Paso. Mohammed Sabri Solomon, 45, of El Paso County. You mean of Egypt. We have some updates from CNN.

They say Boulder attack suspect used a flamethrower. They mentioned he was here illegally. They say, here we go, Holocaust survivor among those wounded in anti-Semitic attack in Colorado event. They say, quote, one of the victims of the Sunday's attack on a group of Jewish community members is a Holocaust survivor. Eight people attending the event to support hostages ranging from 52 to 88 were injured.

One victim was very seriously injured, according to a Boulder police chief, Stephen Redfern. It appears that that individual may be dead. A friend of the Holocaust survivor, Cheney Shiner, described her as an amazing person. She has spoken at her synagogues as well as other synagogues and schools just about her background in the Holocaust and from her own perspective. She's passionate about standing up for good things. She's an extremely exceptional person, always a smile on her face. Her life wasn't easy, but she is just a bright light

And anybody who is a friend is a friend for life. I don't have any good answers for you as I never do. I mean, that's that's not true. I mean, sometimes I do, I guess. I'm just saying I look at these stories and they're escalating. So what we want now and what I can say is I believe that Cash and Dan are doing a good job. I didn't say a great job. I said a good job. I know that we we want things we're not getting. We want the Epstein information, the list released. We want we want arrests pertaining to, you

the corruption in the public sector, it's starting to happen. Now, right after this attack, Kash Patel immediately tweeted this out. This is a suspected terror attack. Local news outlets said we don't know. Local police said we don't know. But the FBI was on top of it, thanks to the leadership of Kash Patel and Dan Bongino. And I know that were this the Biden administration, they would brush this under the rug. So it is curious, where is

All of this is going politically. The Trump administration is pro-Israel and the left is anti-Israel, largely. Even among the more moderate liberal types, they are critical of Israel. Not all of them. Many of them actually support Israel. And then a conservative side, it seems to be those more middle of the road are pro-Israel, but on the fringes of both sides, anti-Israel. On the right, you have a mix of anti-interventionist and anti-Zionist.

People were literally just like, I don't want to be involved in their conflict. And also people who think weirdest things about Israel and conspiracy theories. On the left, you largely have the creepo conspiracy theories and you have for some time. And you know what? I'll throw it back to our friends at the ADL. I mean that sarcastically.

These people helped prop up a far left that hated the Jews and hated Israel. And when there were conservatives promoting Trump and speaking out against the violence, the ADL worked as hard as they could to make sure these people got censored and banned and removed. So you reap what you sow. Now, I'm not talking to the pro-Israel people or just the Jewish people who were attacked. I'm saying this organization specifically.

You wanted to protect leftist psychotic ideology, which built and bred all of this. So I think you deserve some of the blame for the escalation, not for the attacks themselves, obviously, but for the rhetoric that we're seeing now. I'm going to wrap it up there, my friends. Smash the like button. Share the show with everyone you know. Stay tuned. We got more segments coming up for you today, and we'll see you all in the next segment.

I'm sure many of you have heard by now that prominent journalist Glenn Greenwald had, let's just refer to it as intimate tapes leaked of his behaviors. And we'll get into it a little bit. I don't care to get into too much of the gross details. But yeah, his private adult life, including, let's just say, men who were paid to engage in certain behaviors. If you get the drift. OK, here's here's the point.

Glenn Greenwald is a prominent journalist. He's very critical of Israel. Many people are saying that the videos of him that were leaked were meant to damage his credibility, particularly because he's critical of Israel. In fact, there's a meme where it shows Mossad and the CIA leaking Glenn Greenwald's private videos.

In order to discredit him. Well, it's done just that to a certain degree. Now, I have no problem separating the journalist, the journalism side.

From the man. I mean, I certainly have had my criticisms of Glenn Greenwald in the past. And this one is where it gets interesting. Now, Glenn Greenwald has responded to these videos saying that he's proud of what he does in his private life. It's consenting adults. They can do whatever they want. He's never pretended to be a moralist. In fact, he even said, look at Donald Trump. Donald Trump's a philanderer. Brags about grabbing women. Hey, who am I to judge?

And, you know, I look at this and I say, actually, I think Matt Walsh, who's recently come out in a bit more heavy handed of a way, criticizing Glenn Greenwald has a point. You see, it's not just about Glenn Greenwald wanting to be with guys and do whatever it is he was doing. Others have pointed out that there's a meth pipe, apparently a meth pipe in the video, suggesting that he may be engaging in serious illicit drug use and that he has children in his home.

Now, I'm not sure if that means those kids are around any of that stuff. But Matt Walsh personally calls into question whether or not this is good parenting or someone who engages in this kind of behavior can be a good parent and create a safe place for children. Now, I'll get started with the quick details on the issue, I suppose. For those that missed this story, I don't think you did. This was last week. And we didn't really cover it all that much because I got to be honest, I really didn't

don't care about what Glenn Greenwald is doing. Hey, man, look, I got opinions. I think it's kind of nasty. You know, I'm trying to be nice, but it's gross. It is. But at the same time, I'm just like, look, man, I'm worried about our southern border. I'm not worried about the debauchery of one guy. OK, certainly people are claiming the images, the videos were leaked to damage his credibility. But there's a question about Matt Walsh brings it up.

gay men adopting children, and whether or not you can be engaging in these behaviors behind the scenes that I actually think is interesting, especially considering Matt Walsh's criticism is, well, it's fresh. It's from today. Here's a story. And this is the debate. So I hope you guys chime in and let me know what you think. Comment below. The debate, of course, is whether or not you think somebody who is potentially doing drugs and I, man, I don't even want to get into the stuff that Glenn was doing in these videos. I did not watch the videos, man. I would not do that. I don't want to do it.

The Daily Beast reports Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Glenn Greenwald has come out swinging at his political enemies who he claims are responsible for leaking a sex tape of him with another man, the Fox News favorite, whose work reporting on the Edward Snowden NSA surveillance leak won him a Pulitzer Prize in 2014, released a statement calling the release of his sex tapes maliciously political. Greenwald, who is openly gay, said it was posted online without his knowledge or consent and was therefore criminal.

He described them as videos, though so far only one has surfaced. It was quickly deleted from free speech site Rumble, which is partly owned by FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino. So Glenn said, last night, videos were released online to put me in behavior in my private life. Some were distorted and others were not. They were published on my knowledge or consent, and its publication was therefore criminal. Though we do not yet know exactly who is responsible, we are close to knowing. And the motive was maliciously political one.

As for the content of the videos, I have no embarrassment or regret about them. The video is depicting consenting adults engaged in intimate actions in their private lives. They all display fully consensual behavior, harming nobody. Obviously, it can be uncomfortable and unpleasant when your private behavior is made public against your will. That's why the behavior is private in the first place. But the only wrongdoing here is the criminal malicious publication of the videos in an attempt to malign perceived political enemies and advance a political agenda.

Others are, of course, free to form their own judgments, as some are prone to do about others' private lives. It won't change my work. I will continue all the many prongs of my journalism and pursue the causes most important to me, exactly as before. Well, Matt Walsh has chimed in the man himself. He says...

I would like to just, I would just like to point out that it was only a month ago that Glenn Greenwald attacked me and labeled me morally deranged for arguing that gay couples should not adopt children. Safe to say I've been pretty well vindicated at this point. Here's the clip from Tucker Carlson's show with Matt Walsh. In foster care is far from an ideal scenario. It's very, very sad. A child going to two gay parents, I think is worse. I think it's easily worse, actually. Why? Why?

Um, it's just more disordered. It's more confusing for the child. Um, again, neither, neither scenario was good. We don't like either thing, but, um, I, I don't see going to, you know, gay parents as an improvement over the, the, the, what they had before. So we know that it screws kids up or we just sort of intuitively know it. I think we intuitively know, but also there's been plenty of studies done about, um, um,

the mental health effects of kids that grow up in these, you know, single sex, same sex parent homes. There's been a lot of studies done about it, but, but honestly, I don't, you can look at the studies, people will fact check and they're there. I just, I don't need studies for this. It's, it's the same thing with the trans topic, you know,

I don't need studies for this. I hear what you're saying, Matt. I actually agree to a great degree with Matt Walsh. I oppose personally. I do not believe that gay couples should be having surrogate children or in many circumstances adopting children, which is a departure from where I was before. Let me clarify, though. I'm probably—

A little bit to the left of men on this. I believe there are circumstances where adoption to gay parents is better, but I'm largely against it, largely against it. And, you know, and I'm really just saying I'm not an absolutist. I reckon I understand that you might be saying like, hey, look, this kid is in a house where a guy is drinking and beating the kid mercilessly. Can we have a gay couple adopt the kid? It's like.

It's not the preferable circumstance. We can be mad about all of this, but let's just be real. I'd rather like an actual vetted gay couple bring that child in than some evil guy beating the kid and getting drunk and all that stuff. There are circumstances that exist. However, let's talk about this from a surface level position.

I don't agree with surrogacy. And this is becoming a new father myself and learning basic things that most people should probably know really changed my view on this quite a bit. Now, don't get me wrong. I was kind of against the surrogacy thing. I mean, it's it's it. I'm sorry. It freaks me out. Let me let me explain. There's a woman. OK, two guys go to her and say, we're going to pay you to have a baby. Then we're going to take the baby. That's baby buying. I'm just sorry. That is I'm not OK with that. Adoption is a different story.

But I get what Matt Walsh is saying. Now, he says Glenn Greenwald called him morally deranged. And Glenn Greenwald did say this is one has to be morally deranged or totally ignorant of the grim realities of kids lingering without parents and orphanages, shelters and foster care, only to be expelled at 18 with no support to believe that that dark hell is better for kids than being adopted by gay couples. I believe that Matt Walsh's view is that gay couples have a higher tendency towards disorder and

And that's bad for those kids. So let me put it this way. I think we could, you know, I don't know that Matt Walsh articulated it very well in that singular clip. Maybe he did better in other videos. So let me let me let me reiterate. There is a child. Let's say the baby is three months and it is in an orphanage.

I actually don't know if it's better or worse, depending on the orphanage. I mean, there's good orphanages. There's people who get jobs in these places that love kids. I'm not going to act like every orphanage is just the apocalypse for a child. So I'm not convinced that it's going to be outright better than going to a gay couple. I don't know. I don't know. And I would say I would need studies for that.

What I would add is that if there is a circumstance where a child is being abused, then, yeah, I'd say a gay couple is going to be substantially better than a child being beaten. It's tough, isn't it? Because we don't want either of these scenarios. But I think it's not hard to say that.

At least the kid's not being beaten. And some might say, yeah, well, you know, being confused by two gay dads and all that stuff is going to lead to a longer life of problems. Yeah, I got to stop you there. A kid being beaten with broken bones and limbs could just die. And so that's why I say it's not absolute, but I'm largely let's just call it critical of the practice. Now, surrogacy is another picture, the whole other story. That's just buying kids. And that's, you know, like I have a kid.

The mom and the baby, they're attached. They absolutely are. I mean, the baby needs the mom for food. My baby is largely not even a bottle of feeding anymore. We had bottles supplementary and, you know, it's just no mom takes care of the baby and the baby is like baby cries and wants mom to hold her, you know.

It is what it is. I look at this and the things I learned from the doctor about the, you know, not to be gross or anything. This is a natural part of child rearing. But the saliva of the baby on the mother's breast will affect the composition of the milk. That is a bonding relationship you don't get with two dads who pay a woman to give the child she birthed to those two dads. But anyway, I digress. Matt Walsh.

Gets a little bit more in the weeds. He says... He adds...

Greenwald was asked specifically about the apparent meth pipe in the video, and he didn't deny it. Instead, he said he's proud of his personal life. How can anyone defend this? There are three children in that home. Does anyone really think that a home with hard drug use and male prostitution is an appropriate or safe place for children, really?

Well, I don't I don't disagree with Matt. I would. And I know the response on the left is largely going to be that men have hired prostitutes for ages. It's the world's oldest profession. They're going to say you can't prove that that meth pipe was in the house. You're attacking Glenn Greenwald when, for all you know, in his home, everything's fine. You know what I'm gonna say? Sure. But we don't want meth using prostitute buying dudes anymore.

To be adopting kids. I'm going to say it again. Look, I hate to be harsh. Okay. I'm not a strong conservative guy, but I defy you to prove me wrong in this. If a man went to a single man, went to an orphanage and says, I routinely engage in hiring, you know, said behaviors and I'm a hard user of drugs. You think they would let you adopt that kid? They would not do it.

That's that's that's not even about my opinion on the matter. That's about the public opinion on the willingness of the state to allow someone to or not adopt kids. So Glenn Greenwald is asked about the meth pipe specifically. Andrew Breitbart says, I'm trying so hard to see past this video, but the demonic eyes and meth pipe really bother me more than the sexual deviance. Would love to hear some acknowledgement of your use of this dangerous brain altering drug or why that meth pipe was present, if not used.

The way crack and meth impacts the brain can absolutely impact your journalism and professional life. And as a subscriber, I want to know if it is or not. And Glenn said.

The point I've made from the start is that the moral and ethical code I believe in for my own life is when I am satisfied and I am fulfilling. The fruits of my personal and professional life and values they represent speak for themselves. I'm quite proud of them, and I feel no obligation to confine myself to the various moral codes of others professed to believe in when it comes to private behavior. I know who I am, both in public and private. Those who know me best and who I care most about do as well.

And I don't feel I owe anyone, let alone some abstract online commentariat, an obligation to explain or justify those personal choices. Brother, you were accused of doing meth with a male prostitute and you've adopted several children. I think this is something your fans would like to know about.

I'm not running for office. The reason I have a public platform is the journalism I've done that both my husband and I built together. My husband's political career that we built together until it was cut short by his tragic death. The growing community based projects we created together, the books I've written and the places I'm asked to speak. That's what I feel an obligation to account for. My personal and private life is something I'm proud of, but don't consider anyone else's business and is certainly not something that should be publicized without my consent. I agree with that.

Above all else, it's not something I feel any need to justify to others. I am perfectly content if others disapprove of those choices, even strongly because they are fully aligned with my own moral code. He's talking about you doing meth. Okay, like apparently he was doing stuff with this guy. I'm not going to get into it. I don't want to repeat. I didn't watch the video. I've only heard. And this is the point. By all means, if you're into stuff, you're into stuff like, you know, I'm not a conservative guy.

You keep it in private. There are straight couples that do weird things. There are swingers. I'm not saying any of that is good. It's just like people are in a weird stuff. You know, the math, I think, is where we cross the line. Now, if you want to hook up with dudes. Yeah, I really I literally don't care. Like people are criticizing me because we're friends with trans people that come on the show and things like that. And tons of gay people. And I'm like, yeah, I literally don't care. Just like keep it and keep it private.

Now, there are two questions. It's the criminal activity. The hiring of a male prostitute. I don't know if that's legal in Brazil or whatever, but we frown upon it here is criminal, especially if you're adopting kids and the use of meth. Also a serious problem. If you want to come out and say that you like hooking up with dudes, I'm going to be like, yeah, you don't need to tell me that, but I don't I don't need or want to hear it, whatever. But if you are exposed as having committed crimes related to hiring male prostitutes or

Which, you know, there's some libertarians that are like, who cares? And to a certain degree, like, I do get it. But I still find a problem with hiring male prostitutes. Sorry. I got a moral issue with it. The crack in the meth pipe? We got a problem, bro. I mean, any average parent in the United States who has adopted kids or has kids and the video comes out of them with meth in the home? Yeah, child service is going to come and take your kids from you, man. And I don't think people who are doing meth should be adopting kids. There's other...

You know, I got to be harsh with it. And I just, you know, I know it's going to open up the door. People are going to get real pissed off. But we got to do it. Look at this. You know, I feel bad for Glenn Greenwald. He lost his husband. I mean, losing a loved one is hard. David Miranda died of a gastrointestinal infection and a series of successive infections, which led to sepsis in his gut on his 38th birthday. And what people are pointing out and the claims that are being alleged is that

The debaucherous acts that Glenn is engaged in, the reason why they're bad and children shouldn't be around it, is that it could lead to, say, a gastrointestinal infection, sepsis and death. No, I don't know. I'm just going to keep it simple. Right now, there's a lot of people that are anti-Israel that are defending Glenn Greenwald, saying who cares what he does in private. And I don't disagree with them. Matt Walsh is pointing out this dude has adopted kids. So absolutely, we should criticize this. There's two different issues at play.

They're attacking Glenn Greenwald's credibility by releasing these videos. And I don't care about that moral issue as it pertains to the question of Israel and the actions they take. They should be separate.

Matt Walsh's criticism I largely agree with. And I only say largely because he said in that video with Tucker that he doesn't think it's not good to have kids adopted by gay parents. I largely agree with the caveat like there are circumstances where it would be better as much as we don't want – people don't want to admit it or don't like it. That's fine.

But there are two different issues. The issue of Glenn Greenwald being a moral degenerate who called Matt Walsh a moral degenerate and is accused of doing serious heavy drugs. I think that's fair. I think honor matters. And I think people have a question about who they look up to. Now, to be fair, if none of this information got released, then the story that is Glenn Greenwald would largely be run of the mill for the average young person growing up and looking at the work that he's doing.

But this video did get released. And let's be honest, Glenn filmed it. So here we are. I've always said this. You know, I remember when Jennifer Lawrence had all that stuff leaked. I was just like, don't film stuff like I don't get it. These people filming themselves in private doing nasty stuff. And now when the videos come out, they're like, oh, no, how could this have happened? It's like, well, you filmed it.

That was going to happen sooner or later. You like delete your phone and then put in a garbage can. Someone finds it, pulls up the old hard drive and the videos are out there. You made them. They exist. I digress. I can't believe I did 20 minutes on this issue. It's so weird. People were asking me to comment on it. There you go. I'll leave it there. Smash the like button. Share the show with everyone you know. We got more segments coming up. Thanks for hanging out. We'll see y'all in the next bit. Get woke, go broke, my friends. Pride Month is here and it's not.

Companies are pulling back. They're saying no way. They're not changing their logos to these pride flags anymore. They have largely not all backed away from woke messaging that they fear could spark a backlash and trigger a Bud Light effect where they're going to lose a lot of money. CNN has the news. Big brands are pulling back on pride merchandise and events this year.

For the last several years, Pride Month was a splashy marketing event for big brands. Stores adorned windows with rainbow flags, displayed LGBTQ-themed T-shirts and coffee mugs at their entrances, changed their logos on social media accounts, and spotlighted donations to LGBTQ rights groups. But this Pride Month, many retail chains and brands are going quiet.

Companies are treading lightly, avoiding prominent campaigns and visible public support. 39% say they plan to scale back public Pride Month engagements this year, according to a survey of more than 200 corporate executives by Gravity Research. Well, my friends, rest assured, us here at Booneys HQ are not going to be shying away from our Pride Month collection. That's not currently up.

But let me just say, we're going to have our very own Pride Month collection at boonieshq.com. And I'm winking really big at the camera. No, I mean, like we are. You're going to love it. We're going to get in trouble, I imagine. But just pointing this out to keep your eyes peeled. Is that the right way? Your eyes ready? Open? Because we've got some skateboards and shirts and stuff coming out. That's going to be a hoot.

Anyway, consumer brands are wary of provoking right wing customers and activists, and they fear reprisals from President Donald Trump's administration. Federal agencies have threatened to investigate companies with diversity, equity and inclusion programs. I voted for this. Check this out. The Curious Quill on X says June 2nd, no rainbow logos, no pride campaigns. Netflix silent. Disney quiet. Ubisoft ghosted. Looks like corporate pride month is canceled. Take a look at this.

Ubisoft completely unwoke. Next up, we've got Bethesda Game Studios and Netflix. You know what I always loved? My favorite thing about Pride Month was when every logo would be a rainbow except Saudi Arabia. Yeah, all of the corporate locations in the Middle East like Ubisoft Abu Dhabi would not dare put a rainbow flag on.

Indeed. Yeah, they're going to lose money. They say many businesses are tightening their advertising spending due to economic uncertainty over Trump's tariffs. But businesses cited pressure from the Trump admin as the primary reason for changing their Pride Month approach. Quote, it's clear the administration and their supporters are driving the change, said Luke Harding, the president of Gravity Research. Companies are under increasing pressure not to engage in speaking on issues.

The subdued approach marks a shift for businesses, which used to turn the annual June celebration of LGBTQ Americans into a branded holiday. It's part of a broader pivot in corporate America, with many businesses scrapping some of their programs to advance diversity in the workplace under pressure from the Trump administration and Republican activists. Let's call that instead the popular vote majority. Talk about getting a splash cold water in the face when Donald Trump won the popular vote.

While campaigning against this stuff. Now, of course, don't forget, my friends, you all know that July is MAGA month and MAGA month is when we all change our profiles to American flags. So I hope, you know, for this MAGA month, you guys put those American flags up. Now, wondering why so many companies don't put up American flags on MAGA month. Even if you're in Saudi Arabia, you can put an American flag up.

You see, but they don't do it. But they put up the gay flag. You see, that's hypocrisy. We here at boonies.com will have none of it. None of it. Anyway, they're going to say that advocates for gay, lesbian and trans Americans say the Trump admin's opposition makes it harder for businesses to compete, innovate and attract talent. They also won that companies risk losing business by downplaying support for the growing number of gay, lesbian and trans customers and workers.

The proportion of Americans who identify as LGBTQ has risen to 9.3. Yeah, only because of the Q. Listen, we had a guy on the show. I'm not going to say his name. He's like a six foot tall white man who is straight as a straight arrow. And he's like, I am queer. And it's like, you're not. But they can just say that.

Adding the Q was like if in any way you identify not as anything else. It's a tribal signifier. So it means nothing to me. Quote, by weaponizing federal agencies like the EEOC and the DOJ to intimidate companies to support LGBTQ inclusion.

This administration is creating an anti-business, anti-worker atmosphere, said Eric Blum, the vice president of corporate citizenship at the Human Rights Campaign Foundation. Many businesses have stopped participating in the Human Rights Campaign's scorecard on corporate policies and benefits for LGBTQ employees due to backlash. Companies that show up only when it's convenient are

Or backtrack. The moment there's political pressure, risk losing trust and credibility. Oh, yeah? Let's talk about Bud Light and Target. I love this one. Companies are actively preparing for pride-related backlash this year from conservative activists and consumers. 65% of companies in Gravity's gravity research survey said they were preparing strategies to respond to blowback.

A growing number of chains, including Walmart, Target, Kroger, have also been warning investors about the risks of consumer boycotts over corporate positions on social issues. When I go to Target, you know what I want to see? I want to see that stupid, crappy pizza hut. I want to see that little Starbucks and I can get a cup of coffee and a personal pizza, which, to be honest, I would not. I'm not going to get. I don't eat that garbage.

I digress. I want to go in and I want to see food, drink, and clothes. Instead, what Target started doing was putting a bunch of gay stuff everywhere. And it's like, listen, I don't go to Target for any of this. Now,

For a lot of people, it didn't matter when they didn't have kids. Now people are starting millennials trying to have kids. And there was one viral video where like a mom came in with her daughter and they had this big LGBT thing talking about like tuck friendly bathing suits. And the mom flipped out like, why? I don't want my daughter seeing that. That's it is insane.

That right. The issue is supposed to be we want to go grocery shopping. I want to get a pack of T-shirts and maybe you go to the food section, you get all in one trip. And now you got to go in there and start talking about sex to it, to your child. You don't want to do. So people said goodbye and stopped going to Target and Target felt the burn. Now for Bud Light, their principal demo is middle aged men.

They just want to have a low-calorie beer. And Bud Light, I can't believe people drink this stuff. I got to be honest. I go to the local casino. I'm playing poker, and a guy orders a Bud Light. And I'm just like, of all the beers you could order, listen, we got Yingling. Why are you drinking Bud Light? But whatever, man. I don't care what people drink. That being said, Bud Light became a symbol of being gay because they hired some millennial woman who came in and said—

You know what's fascinating is she's not mathematically wrong, but she was just socially wrong. And what I mean by that is you come in and you say, here's how much we're doing in sales. It's fantastic. Bud Light's number one. Imagine if we doubled that by targeting women. Here's how you market to women.

They didn't realize, though, that, you know, when you used to have the beer commercials where it's like women with big boobs by the pool and the guys are walking up and they're drinking a beer, slamming on a table and being like, she got giant knockers. And that was what was selling beer. OK, when you dump that and bring on a mentally unwell individual to go and mock women, everyone dislikes that. Literally everybody. Right.

And then, of course, you lose all your business, except for the people who don't pay attention. But man, talk about losing a third of your market share because you wanted to have some... Look, you know what's funny?

Bud Light could have done a pride commercial or a promotion that wouldn't have bombed so miserably. But Bud Light used Dylan Mulvaney, who has intentionally insulted women. And I'm not being cute. I'm not exaggerating. Dylan Mulvaney has videos insulting women, being like, I cried today for no reason. Look at me. I'm going online and buying just what I want. I'm like, yeah, that's literally just insulting stereotypes about women. He wasn't like saying he felt like

hugging a stuffed animal or something. I don't know. He was just insulting the stereotypes about women. Everybody got pissed off. They want to say anger from the right over Bud Light and Target's marketing efforts in particular has had a chilling effect on corporate strategies for Pride Month. Good. Bud Light sales tanked in 23 to the company's partnership with trans influencer Dylan Mulvaney. We get it. Also, 23 activists and customers on the right attacked Target

On social media for its LGBTQ themed merchandise during Pride Month, tuck friendly bathing suits front and center for children to see. And they're going to be like, what's tucking? And it's going to be like, I don't want my kid learning about this weird degenerate amoral crack pottery. It led to a drop in sales and lawsuits from Republican aligned groups. Last year, Target sold Pride products in fewer stores. They even had one, I think it was Starbucks.

Starbucks wasn't even putting up pride stuff. And there was a viral video where employees were complaining, saying Starbucks told them to take down their pride stuff. Bro, I'm going to tell you. I'm going to tell you right now. I go somewhere. I'm not going to go to a shop that's got weird, psychotic leftist stuff in it. You know why? Because leftists are violent. That's just the reality. They are violent, whether it is, and they aggress. I'll put it that way. So I'm going to say this.

I'm not talking about you. I'm talking about me. I am, you know, it's not a humble brag, but I am high profile. I go out. People recognize me. If I'm going to, say, play Magic the Gathering and I go to a shop to buy some magic cards and I see big, far leftist stuff in the window, I turn right around. I leave because I know that I run the risk of going in and these people are going to start screaming at me. Isn't that crazy?

A leftist can go into a right-wing store and they're not going to say anything. They're going to say, just give us your money, whatever. Maybe sometimes, probably not. So I go to a shop and they got the weird leftist ideology stuff in there. I'm like, these are cult-minded individuals in a way the right is not. If I see an American flag, I don't think twice. They're not going to say anything. If you're a purple-haired, far-left trans person and you walk into a place with an American flag, they ain't going to say nothing to you. But I know that if I go to a place where they got the weird pride far-leftist stuff, you run that risk.

I'm not saying it's absolute or always happens, but it has. So you want to run that stuff? I ain't going there. OK, Starbucks, you want to put all that weird crackpot BS in your window? I ain't going there. I ain't going there. This is it feels like we've catered to the direction of the administration. The person said Target's pride merchandise is limited and displayed less prominently in stores in previous years. Good.

Last year, Cole launched the Pride Capsule collection of merchandise and donated $100,000 to the Trevor Project, a suicide prevention and crisis intervention organization for LGBTQ youth. And they got roasted for it. They got roasted for it. So right now, everybody's pointing it out. It's officially the beginning of Pride Month, and most companies have said, nah. I say good. They realize you get woke, you go broke. I'll leave it there. Smash the like button. Share the show with everyone you know. Stay tuned. We got more segments coming up for you throughout the day, and we'll see you all in the next bit.

Democratic Rep Nadler had his office raided by DHS staffers handcuffed, accused of aiding and hiding rioters.

who had been on the ground protesting some earlier that morning. Now, it seems pretty simple. Nothing ended up happening. They came in arrest. They cuffed the person. Well, actually, let me slow down. They came in and said, hey, we think you're aiding rioters. Let us in. They said no. And they said, then you're being detained. And then went in and said, OK, we're leaving. But for Democrats, it's the apocalypse. Nadler's calling for an investigation. But I say this, my friends, good. I'm glad this happened.

We need a DHS, an FBI, a federal law enforcement system that is unafraid to challenge politicians who we know do break the law or aid criminal violent elements. We just had a shocking terror attack in Boulder, Colorado. Before this, only within the past two weeks, another terror attack. Two young people killed in D.C.,

And of course, the governor of Pennsylvania has home firebombed. These are far left violent individuals. And if we don't have an administration willing to challenge politicians who might speak out in defense of these these violent acts, it's going to keep getting worse. Now, the reason why this matters as it pertains to Nadler is Nadler famously said five years ago that Antifa violence is a myth.

now accused his office of helping some of these rioters. Now, I'm not saying he actually did, but I will say this. In my humble opinion, having been covering this stuff for some near two decades now, I will tell you, these people are likely coordinating. Democratic politicians, many of them don't participate or actively work with any violent groups or anything like this, but they do cover for them.

Because these people are a component of their constituency. Democrats, they get votes from these people. And I love it because I always hear this. They say, Tim, you've got to differentiate between leftists and liberals because, you know, we had this woman on last week and she's saying this. And I'm like, nah, nah, because they vote for it because prominent progressives, they go on. They say, I'm not in favor of the Democratic Party. Go vote for Democrats.

And it's like, well, you just told everybody go vote for Joe Biden while claiming that you're a progressive who opposes the establishment uniparty machine. How does that make sense? Not me. I'll tell you this. Donald Trump is outside that broken uniparty machine. They hate the guy. Not that anything is perfect, but I have of no illusions that.

You know, Donald Trump is not a prominent politician in the United States government that's going to enact policies and engage in law enforcement. Dare I say I voted for it. So the difference here is I will look at Donald Trump's actions and say, I like Trump and I'm going to vote for him. The left says the Democrats are really, really bad. Then the last minute come out and say, yeah, but vote for him anyway, because they're liars. They're hypocrites.

Many of these people who have celebrated and promoted the violent claimed they were peaceful protests. Turn around and say, vote Democrat. The Democrats know it. So let's talk about this, my friend. Smash that like button. Share the show. Shout out to Steven Crowder and the Mug Club. Welcome to your Rumble Morning lineup. I'm your host, Tim Pool, bringing you into that afternoon. You can follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast. Don't forget to subscribe and share the show right now. Everybody watching is the most important thing.

We're already dominating the entire live show morning lineup daily nationally. So Tim Kess IRL is averaging around the second biggest live stream in the country. The Tim Pool morning news show, which you're watching right now, we're hitting maybe like number six, number seven.

Rumble has like 70% of the biggest live streams in the country. If you want to make sure that that stays and even improves, everybody watching right now, share the link to this wherever you can. I can only speak for myself. I'll tell you to share every show you watch. That's important. But for me here right now, if everybody watching shared this, we'd be number one. So I really do appreciate it. Before I get started, my friends, make sure you go to castbrew.com and buy some Cast Brew coffee because it's the best coffee

The best coffee you will ever have, I guarantee it, because that's a nebulous and vague statement, but I really like it. I really do like it. Full disclosure, I actually do have Starbucks right now. Hey, sometimes, you know. There's a big market for coffee, but we got Ian's Graphene Dream. We got Appalachian Nights. Of course, use promo code Rumble10. You'll get 10% off. Check it out. Here's a story from the New York Times. Yo, what's going on?

Interesting. I do want to give a mention as an aside. ICE agents...

Are going to immigration courts waiting in the hallways. And when the judge denies the asylum claim, as they almost always do, these guys walk right out into the hands of ICE who arrest them and send them on their way. I voted for this. The New York Times reports. New York Times.

Federal officers entered Representative Jerry Nadler's office in Lower Manhattan on Wednesday and handcuffed and briefly detained one of his aides. The confrontation happened shortly after the aide observed federal agents detaining migrants in a public hallway outside an immigration courtroom in the same building as the congressman's office. The episode was recorded by someone who was sitting in Mr. Nadler's office. In the video, the officer with the Federal Protective Service, part of DHS, is shown demanding access to a private area in the office. The video is obtained by Gothamist. That still exists? Wow.

which earlier reported the confrontation. Now, I do believe we have the video in question, ladies and gentlemen.

You're okay. You're okay. You're going to be okay. I hate this.

And that's all. This woman is crying. She's crying. You blocked federal officers. Now, OK, let's let's let's let's talk about some of the questions here. Do they have a warrant?

There is, I forget what it's called, but all of our friends who are law enforcement officers explain this on one of our Rumble Rants, that when a police officer pursues someone into a building, they don't need a warrant to continue pursuing them. There's something specifically about that. Now, in this instance, I don't believe there was anybody in the building. So I'm not entirely sure what the issue was here.

Nothing ended up happening. Nadler's pissed. He's calling it for an investigation. But I'm gonna tell you right away, I voted for it. Listen to that woman crying, okay? It's infuriating. I'll tell you why. The far left has advocated for violence.

These people go out in the streets, these leftists, not all of them, not every liberal. I'm not blaming everybody. But you often get these these these whinging leftists. They will go out and they will hit people. They will throw bricks at people. They will beat people. And in the moment they get caught, they go. It's our crying like whining babies. Dude, some cops briefly detained you. Calm down. These people are nuts. It can happen to anyone.

Nadler rebukes DHS after staff are detained in Manhattan office. The agency said the undefined staff member was not charged. Indeed, they say the incident was first reported by the Gothamist. We get it. Quote, I'm a federal officer. The DHS official said to a second staff member in the video posted by Gothamist, adding, we have a right to check the office. And in fact, it may be the case because the office is in a public building. And I mean like a courthouse building.

The second staff member who could be seen initially blocking the officer's entry to a private area asked whether the officers had a warrant to which the officer replied negatively. The staff member eventually acquiesced, allowing the officer to walk through the area. Nadler slammed both DHS and Trump in a statement Saturday afternoon for demonstrating aggressive and heavy handed tactics and sowing chaos, not only in his district, but across the country. Yet Donald Trump had no idea these guys were doing this.

These are these are federal protective services cops. These are federal cops. And I just want to stress that these Democrats had no problem with Capitol Police raiding people's homes going across the country over J6, even when they were wrong. And I didn't see anybody coming on a national television when Capitol Police raided the home of a woman in Alaska simply for resembling a woman they saw in surveillance video footage from the Capitol.

They hunted these people down mercilessly, showing up at their doorsteps at 3 a.m., kicking their doors in with rifles when these people were bumbling about the Capitol. I ain't talking about the rioters. I'm talking about people who showed up after the riot, walking around confused, having their homes raided. And Democrats did not care. Now, what do we have here? Some feds came up, briefly detained a woman who cried her eyes out, and literally nothing ended up happening.

Spare me. As we're dealing with all this far left violence and we said a terror attack. The last thing I'm concerned about is some federal agent knocking on the door saying, can I come in? And a lady saying yes. And he comes in stupid. He said, here we go. President Trump and the DHS are sowing chaos in our communities using intimidation tactics against both citizens and noncitizens in a reckless and dangerous manner.

In the most recent and deeply troubling incident, DHS agents forcefully entered my congressional office. They were let in and handcuffed a member of my staff, Nadler said. Now, to be fair, it's 50-50. They did briefly detain someone. I believe they accused her of harboring, get out of here, fly, harboring rioters who had been there earlier in the morning. Nadler said, adding that he was alarmed by the aggressive and heavy-handed tactics DHS is employing in New York City and across the country. No, I'm for it.

They're dumping their sanctuary city list. They're saying, all right, we don't care if you think you're a sanctuary. You ain't.

The New York rep also cautioned that the incident showed a deeply troubling disregard for proper legal boundaries and warned that if this can happen in a member of Congress's office, it can happen to anyone. And it is happening. But the DHS maintained in a statement issued earlier on Saturday that its federal protective service officer showed up at Nadler's office to conduct a security check because they were concerned about the safety of the federal employees in the office after hearing reports of incidents nearby.

The statement did not mention the issue of harboring rioters the officer referred to in the video. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment Saturday afternoon. They say DHS officers identified themselves and entered the office where they were met by four people who remained unnamed in the agency's statement. One of the individuals became verbally confrontational and physically blocked access to the office. The statement of political red. Now, I think the challenge here with Warren is that

They already have a right to be in the building. Now, I'm sure there's a question about a right to enter that particular room because people should still be protected in their rights. Like if just because I rent an office doesn't mean a cop can just come in because he got an office in the same building. That being said, there may be some kind of special circumstance considering the DHS has a department office and it's a courtroom in that building. So I don't know for sure. Now, Congressman Jerry Nadler.

on CNN calling for an investigation saying, oh, heavens me. Lying story about what happened. They were, DHS was upset that some of my staff members were watching them grab immigrants emerging from an immigration court in the same building a floor below. And they were upset that, um,

My staff invited some of the observers up to my office. They then came up to the office and demanded entrance. One of my staff members said, you can't come in here, you need a warrant. They said, no, we don't need a warrant, which is incorrect. And they barged in. And in barging in, one of the officers, a very...

Big, heavyset fellow pushed my aide, a very petite young woman. And they then said that she pushed back and they shackled her and took her down. Thank you for the context, Rep Nadler. I'm going to say this. Rep Nadler's claim of DHS violence is a myth. It's a myth. It never happened. He's just making it up. So goodbye.

At least that's what he claimed when it came to violence from Antifa. He said it's a myth. It's not happening. So when you have far leftists roving our streets, smashing things, throwing firebombs and all of that stuff, and then you want to claim it's a myth, why don't I just say that? But I do appreciate the context here where he says she pushed a cop. That's why she got detained. Okay. Nothing happened. These people are lunatics. All right. Let's take a look at this story. We saw this in the morning.

FBI charges terror suspect Mohammed Sabri Solomon in firebombing attack on Boulder, Colorado, March for Israeli hostages. I know you know the story. I did cover it this morning. This guy was an illegal immigrant. He came to this country, overstayed his visa, and then applied under the Biden administration to stay. And they let him. They gave him a work permit.

So here's a man who's here illegally. He, I would argue, entered under false pretenses. He came to this country, which appears to be a tourist visa. I could be wrong, but it was like a six month stay. He overstays the visa. And then he says, I want to be able to work here. And Biden said yes. And then he goes to a rally.

In Boulder. And I guess they said he was using a makeshift flamethrower of some sort. What does that really mean? He was like splashing people with kerosene or something. I mean, it's horrifying. I don't know. I don't know what makeshift flamethrower means. But yeah, he's firebombing people. This is what we deal with. Here's another one from the Post Millennial. Muslim man pleads guilty to firearm charges after planning to kill Jewish preschoolers at Michigan Synagogue. Jeez, man. He threatened to even the score.

Now, what's funny is for a while when we talked about Islamic terror, there were a lot of people that claimed that, you know, Islamic violence is not associated with the left. It's something different. And I can't remember who it was. It might have been Majid Nawaz saying that you've got leftist violence, you've got right-wing violence, and then you have from above, referencing religious ideological violence, which doesn't necessarily overlap with left or right-wing ideology.

Well, I'll tell you this right now. It does. It is the left that is marching for this. Greta Thunberg. Did you see this?

Greta Thunberg putting on her keffiyeh, going on a flotilla and being like, we have to go to Gaza because climate change. And I'm like, what is she even talking about anymore? Dude, I got no problem if she wants to protest for Gaza, by all means. But this just shows you that it's a grift for many of these people. This chick skipped school for climate change. She has no idea what she's talking about. She goes on a multimillion dollar boat ride and then claimed, which was made of like petrochemicals, by the way, fiberglass and plastics.

And then using all this luxury and wealth, she's like, everyone else has to stop using carbon. You know, right now, it's like 60 million people would die if that was the case. But they're hypocrites. Right now, the left has wholly adopted this cause completely.

And where we're currently at is we have to deal with violence from Democrats and from their liberal and far left constituents. Notably, this story about Rep. LaMonica McIver, which I'd like to bring up in this context as Jerry Nadler is saying, I can't believe that DHS would do this in my office. Yeah, well, we just had a couple of Democratic members of Congress physically attack federal law enforcement officers. So.

So I don't care to play games anymore. Now, I get these people, these these liberal types, disaffected, whiny liberals who are saying things like, but we must maintain the rule of law. The rule of law has been gone for a long time. There's nothing to be maintained. I'm sorry. I mean, like, it's a little bit hyperbolic. My point is this. We as a nation cannot have Antifa firebombing buildings for years.

shooting at people, killing people, firebombing Teslas, shooting into buildings, shooting into people's cars. That's what they were doing during the BLM riots only five years ago, running up to somebody in Provo, Utah for no reason and shooting the driver. This stuff happening all the time. And now where we're at is Democrat on camera punching federal law enforcement.

So when the news comes out that some DHS guys went to an office, knocked, got into an altercation with some lady who was briefly detained, I am not sweating in the least bit. But to these liberals, they're saying things like,

You know, Trump is crossing the line. You know, it's unconstitutional. I'm just like, where were you in the past four years when they were arresting Trump's lawyers, falsely accusing him of crimes, raiding his home under false pretenses, giving Joe Biden, despite the fact they knew he committed a crime, giving him a freebie and saying, yeah, but he's a well-to-do old man with a bad memory.

I am not going to sit here and advocate for Donald Trump to do anything unconstitutional. I'm not going to say it's good. These conflicts are happening. I'm only going to say I do not care for these whiny liberals who are like, but Donald Trump has crossed the line. No, he didn't. The line was crossed a long time ago, and now there's no line to be seen. This is where we are. Check this out. Where things are going to be ramping up. U.S. Homeland Security removes list of sanctuary cities after sheriff's criticism.

President of Sheriff's Association says noncompliant list violated the core principles of trust with law enforcement. Interesting. It's time to start the raids. It's time to start the deportations. I got to talk to Tom Holman last week, and he said, we're deporting them. You're getting out of here. We're not waiting around.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security removed a list of sanctuary states, cities and counties from its website following sharp criticism from a sheriff's association that said a list of noncompliant sheriffs could severely damage the relationship between the Trump administration and law enforcement. DHS on Thursday published a list of what it called sanctuary jurisdictions that it deemed were included in areas that have a policy of limiting cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.

The list prompted a response from the National Sheriff's Association, which represents more than 3,000 elected sheriffs across the country and generally supports federal immigration enforcement. Sheriff Kieran Donahue, president of the association, said in a statement on Saturday that DHS published a list of alleged noncompliant sheriffs in a manner that lacked transparency and accountability. Donahue said the list was created without input from sheriffs and violated the core principles of trust, cooperation, and partnership.

Donald Trump had called for his administration to tally apparent sanctuary jurisdictions in a late April executive order, saying the lack of cooperation amounted to a lawless insurrection. Indeed, the reason why they're doing this, albeit with a little bit of a hiccup right now, they're pulling the list, but I still think they're moving in the right direction. Trump saying this was an effort to lay the groundwork to invoke the Insurrection Act so he could go in and enforce the law.

The DHS website listing the jurisdictions was offline on Sunday, an issue that Fox News host Maria Bartiromo raised with the Homeland Security Secretary, Kristi Noem, in the talk show Sunday Morning Futures. I saw that there was a list produced. Now the list I don't see anymore in the media. Do you have a list of the sanctuary cities that are actually hiding illegals right now? Noem did not acknowledge the list being taken offline, but said some localities had bristled.

Some of the cities pushed back. They think because they don't have one law or another on the books, they don't qualify. But they do qualify. They are giving sanctuary to criminals. Indeed. Yeah. One of these criminals just apparently murdered some people.

The the feds are charging that guy in Colorado with murder. Now, they've not released information on the victims. But the assumption we can make is that somebody has lost their life. And I think it's disgusting that anybody would try to defend the practice of the Biden administration. It is insane to me. I talk about how I didn't used to believe in evil when I was younger and I do now. And I'll give you an example there. I can understand or make the argument any direction.

as to why someone would or would not support an illegal immigrant. However, in this capacity that we are dealing with right now, there isn't one real argument to be made. This is why the media lies about everything. The reason why the left is lying, the Democrats are lying, is because there's no functional argument to be made. I'll give you guys a recommendation for some content here.

Go to rumble.com slash Tim Pool or youtube.com slash Timcast and watch the last full episode of The Culture War, which was about young men leaving the left and leaving the Democratic Party, for which I debated this woman who was a liberal. And I told her over and over again, the sophistry does not work. She made the argument about transgender issues, you know, that being a woman is just a performance, that women look a certain way and therefore no one's buying it.

The sophistry is fake arguments to try and convince somebody. This is what they're doing. So let's talk about illegal immigrants and how the liberals have to operate. Give me one functionally logical reason for why criminal illegal immigrants are allowed to be here, even the ones that are violent. They don't get deported. OK, now that you don't have one. Now, what arguments could we try to make? Economics.

We need a mass influx of illegal immigrants because our economy is hurt. We don't have the incoming youth labor force because people aren't having kids. So we need to bring in workers from other countries. Interesting argument. Now, explain to me why you're not deporting the criminals. There's no answer. They can say these people are asylum seekers who are fleeing danger. OK, why aren't you deporting the criminals? Huh? About that.

Why are you fighting so hard for the criminals? What do they have? Just lie about it. Because there is a reason. There's one real reason they can't admit. Democrats want every single illegal immigrant in here, criminal or otherwise. So it will boost their congressional representation illegally after the 2030 census. It's the play they made last 2020. It's the play they're going to make again in 2030. Now, they can't come out and tell you that.

They can't come out and say, we only have political power because we've cheated over the past 30 years. But I'll say it like this. The reason why they're violent, the reason why they lie, aid and abet criminals is because they only get by through cheating. Now, I'm not talking about illegal immigrants voting in elections or anything like that, which maybe happens to some degree.

I am talking about the fact that based on the number of illegal immigrants in this country, Democrats may have upwards of 10 extra congressional votes and 10 extra electoral college votes. That means right now the congressional makeup should be 12 plus Republican, giving them a clean majority and a capability to pass tons of laws that are pro-America.

But they can't because Democrats give them extra seats. They bring in illegal immigrants. They won't deport them. And then they end up with more seats in California, largely in other sanctuary jurisdictions. Indeed, we are then left holding the an empty bag. This is entered into congressional record. And I'll show you guys here from Nadler. Give you an example of who he is and what he represents. Rep Jerry Nadler says antifa violence in Portland. A myth. Just a myth.

And this is at congress.gov, entered into their record, because it's not. Quote, I ran into Jerry Nadler in D.C. and asked him to disavow the Antifa violence and rioting in Portland. His response, that's a myth. It's true, Mr. Fletcher tells Mr. Nadler in the video, there's violence across the whole country. Do you disavow the violence from Antifa, what's happening in Portland? There's riots. That's a myth that's being spread only in D.C. I can't stand these people. They are liars, they are evil, and they gaslight. Nadler knows that when he goes on CNN,

When he goes to when he goes to these these media outlets and he says it's a myth, he knows he's lying, but he knows that the older folks watching that believe him. And that's the one demographic that is largely anti-Trump. So when DHS goes to his office suspecting they may be aiding and abetting criminal rioters, I say, OK. And then some woman is accused of shoving a cop so she gets detained.

The cop asked somebody to come in. She lets him in. What's the problem? What's the problem? Now it was like they needed a warrant. Yeah, OK. No, I'll agree with you there. But she let him in. The one chick was accused of shoving a cop and he didn't even get her for assaulting an officer. They just detained her briefly and left. The other lady let him come in. She let him in. They walked around. I do feel like with Kash Patel, we got big news here. Going after top officials, making the arrests, taking the action, publishing the documents. The cascade is just beginning.

So I got no guarantees for you. No guarantees. I don't know if Cash and Dan are to be trusted. I trust them, though. I'm saying, like, I don't know what I can tell you. I'm confident that we are going to get proper action. And, you know, it's not going to be perfect. It's not going to be everything you could hope and dream for, but it'll be something. And the fact that Cash has already made these moves, shutting down the Hoover building, ousting top officials, calling for lie detector tests—

He publicly stated Comey's responsible for the largest criminal conspiracy. I do think we are going to get action from the FBI going after the corruption, no longer tolerating violence from these Democrats. And I say, good. That's what we need to be doing. Now, my friends.

No guests today, but we do have another half an hour for you, so smash that like button. Share the show with everyone you know. If everybody who watched right now shared this video, it would be the biggest new show in the country. So if you like the work that I do, I really do appreciate it. Let's dominate the top of those charts and the live streaming and make something great. There's big changes coming in this country that I'm very excited to see. One is the actions of Kash Patel and Dan Bongino, obviously. But we've also got...

Pride month is over. Corporations are dropping all of this stuff. We've got big moves in the media landscape. That is not all bad. The Democrats are playing their Project Sam game. But I think we're going to see a move in the other direction. I think the writing is on the wall for the big companies. And they know, hey, look, if we're going to be on the right side of history, it's not going to be woke. You go that route, you go broke. So once again, smash that like button. Share the show. Stay tuned. More to come. Thanks for hanging out. We'll see you all in the next segment.