Democrats GO INSANE At Al Green Censure Vote, Start SINGING And OBSTRUCT Official House Proceedings
02:09:54 Share

I'm sorry, my friends. I can only describe the Democrats as insane. OK, as insane. I was thinking about this morning. I'm like, maybe I should just try and be a little nicer, but I can't. I cannot do it. The Democrats are insane.

Al Green screamed out during Trump's address to a joint session of Congress. He was told numerous times to sit down and to be quiet. He was disrupting the proceeding and he refused. They asked him again, if you don't, we're going to throw you out. They threw the guy out.

They now are going to censure him. They did censure him. Get this. Democrats disrupted the House again as they were censuring Al Green for disrupting the address from Donald Trump. Frank Luntz said that Trump's speech was manna from heaven for Republicans. And I'll say not just that. The way the Democrats acted gave the Republicans a beautiful gift for the midterms.

They can't learn, can they? Fox News says Dems throw House into chaos after 10 moderates joined GOP to punish Al Green. Yo, he's being censured. Do you guys know what that means? It means they wiggle their finger at him. That's it. So a bunch of Democrats start protesting. Speaker Johnson is banging the gavel being like order and they refuse. They refuse. I can't believe it. They should be expelled.

Maybe at least Al Green. It's performative. Nothing is getting done. I'm I'm just so over it. I got to be honest. We send people to Congress to do a job. There is no legislature. There is none. There is only a dog and pony show.

We send people to Congress believing in our naivete that they're going to actually vote on bills. Only a small handful do. Thomas Massey, shout out. Marjorie Taylor Greene, shout out. There's a handful of others that are pretty good. But for the most part, all they do is spectacle. Al Green stood up wiggling his cane at Trump, not because he actually cared, but because he wants to get reelected.

He knows that video will play well among his diehard Trump derangement syndrome base. And he is going to secure reelection and keep his fake job where all of them, all of them, save only a small handful, are just under the employ of lobbyists. Oh, boy. Let's let's let me play the video for you. And so you can see. So they did censure this guy. Here's what went down. We got a C-SPAN video loading up one second. Any minute now they're going to start talking.

At least I hope so. By its adoption of House Resolution 189, the House has resolved that Representative Al Green be censured.

That Representative Al Green forthwith present himself in the well of the House of Representatives for the pronouncement of censure. So real quick, I'm going to go back a second. The reason I minimize the player is so you can see the cluster of Democrats on the left side. When I when I zoom in, it gets actually blocked out by the the frame I have for the show. So I'll play just I'll go back. But you get the point. Maybe I went too far. Nine. The House has resolved that Representative Al Green be censured.

That Representative Al Green forthwith present himself in the well of the House of Representatives for the pronouncement of censure. They're singing. And that Representative Al Green be censured with public reading of this resolution by the Speaker. The Democrats are all singing right now. I don't know what they're singing. The House had come to order. The House had come to order. Oh my God.

The House has come to order. Clear the well, please. Clear the well. The House has to... Nope. Democrats are all just standing there singing. Yo, is that AOC? No, that's not AOC. Where's AOC at? They mute audio again. Oh, what's this? Pursuant to Clause 12A of Rule 1, the House will stand in recess, subject to the call of the chair. Wow. Yo, that's crazy. I'm sick of these people. I am sick of these people. I am sick of this. This was at 10 in the morning.

The Democrats go into the well of the House and start singing, singing. What did Mike Johnson do? He recessed. Call the sergeant at arms and lock them all up. Throw them out. They're disrupting an official proceeding. Why are we tolerating this? Fox News reports 10 Democrats, two Republicans in voting, voting for the measure to censure Green. Green himself voted present. Interesting.

along with first term rep Shamari figures. Al Green's childish outburst exposed the chaos and dysfunction with the Democratic Party since President Trump's overwhelming win in November and his success in office thus far. It is not surprising 198 Democrats refused to support Green's censure, given the historical of the history of radical inflammatory rhetoric fueled by the Trump derangement syndrome. Tom Emmer told Fox News.

Before the formal censure could be read out to green, however, Democrats upended the House floor proceedings by gathering with the Texas Democrat and singing We Shall Overcome. Oh, these people are insane. Please, please keep doing it. We are going to swim through the midterms. They're nuts.

Decorum eroded further afterwards, with several Democrats, including squad member Anna Presley, engaging in a heated exchange with Republicans. The 10 Democrats who voted for the censure, we get it. Republicans raced to introduce competing resolutions to censure Green on Wednesday, with three separate texts being drafted. Fox News is told that Rep. Dan Newhouse of Washington, whose resolution got a vote on the floor, reached out to Johnson about a censure resolution immediately after Trump's speech. Yada, yada, we get it.

Al Green was screaming, yo, this is crazy. Despite my repeated warnings, he refused to cease his antics, and I was forced to remove him from the chamber, Johnson posted on X. He deliberately violated House rules, and an expeditious vote of censure is an appropriate remedy. Any Democrat who is concerned about regaining the trust and respect of the American people should join House Republicans in this effort. Green, who shook Newhouse's hand before speaking during debate on his own censure, stood by his actions on Wednesday.

I heard the speaker when he said that I should cease. I did not. And I did not with intentionality. It was not done out of a burst of emotion. It's because he's a scumbag. It's because Al Green's trying to make a video where he gets elected. That's why they're singing. We shall overcome. These are not protesters. There's supposed to be professionals. This country is in disarray. I can only hope that something is done. But the system is crumbling before our eyes. We expect members of Congress to go to D.C., vote on legislation.

They don't. Now it's just cognitively impaired individuals singing songs. And Mike Johnson should have called the sergeant at arms to say, clear the well. That's it. Clear the well. Capitol Police come in, clear the well. I don't know what you do. To be honest, they they want it. They want it to happen. But at a certain point, you say, OK, you get what you want. And the police, they will come in and they will remove all of you and then they all get censured.

And then the Republicans should be voting to expel these people. I ain't playing games. Mike Johnson. I'm going to make some phone calls. I'm going to call some members of Congress with my phone. I'm going to say introduce a resolution to expel these members. Kick them out. If they're not going to do their jobs, if they're going to pander and sing and not come to order, they should all be expelled. Why don't they do it? Because I don't believe.

Any of them are willing to do their jobs. I don't know. Pathetic. Here we have this poll in the Fox News article that is funny as an aside. Will Ukraine sign a mineral deal with the U.S. by April 30th? I'm going to vote yes. How do you do this? We go, oh, I'll give it 85% chance. Submit. I ain't signing up, Fox. Quote, I think that on some occasions, questions of conscience, you have to be willing to suffer the consequences. And I've said I will. I will suffer whatever the consequences are. Yeah, expel him. Censure is meaningless.

Other recent lawmakers censured the House floor rep who have been censured is Rashida Tlaib, Rep. Jamal Bowman, and now Adam Schiff. You know what the funny thing is? I think only 28 members of Congress have ever been censured, and it looks like five of them. What do you have? Rashida Tlaib, Jamal Bowman, Schiff. And is that it? Is it four in the past couple of years? Insane. You know what, man? If they're not expelling these people, I don't know what they're doing.

Ten Democrats joined Republicans for that censure. Good. Good. I think I have a tweet pulled up. Oh, man. I'm going to say this. I'm going to let the Democrats do their thing. Have you guys seen this video? I'll give you a little bonus here. This is Democrats Choose Your Fighter. First of all, it said Choose Your Character because it was a Smash Brothers Melee character selection song. But then it says Choose Your Fighter. And then it's a bunch of Democrat women bobbing up and down like they're fighting in what may be one of the worst things I've ever seen.

What are they doing? I had to watch it, so now you do too. This is the Democratic Party.

Maybe we shouldn't expel them. Maybe we need a Harlem Globetrotters and the Republicans will just end up sweeping. They keep saying that Trump's unpopular, but he won the popular vote for the first time for the Republicans in 20 years. Every county shifted rightward. He won every swing state. Cry more. You people are nuts. Smash the like button. Share the show. Thanks, Frank. And now we got more segments coming up and we will see you all in the next bit.

Thank you.

From defining your vision to successfully transitioning your clients, Schwab helps you build your roadmap to independence. To find your path, start with Schwab Advisor Services at advisorservices.schwab.com backslash paths today.

Criminal charges. Donald Trump is considering criminal charges for USAID staff after Doge uncovers wild abuse. Boy, do I got some stories for you. $18 million per month to an empty migrant facility. And how about the story of John Podesta's slush fund? We got Lee Zeldin at the EPA and apparently they uncovered

That I think was a three hundred seventy five billion dollars at the number. I just jumped to this real quick. Make sure the number three hundred seventy five billion dollars were being handed out to charities over climate change. And some of them had been formed only one month prior. Doesn't sound real, does it? Now, as most of you know, Donald Trump has been calling out waste, fraud and abuse. And the response we got from Democrats was, well, how do we how do we know it's fraud?

OK, well, right now we've got this Supreme Court ruling where they basically said they're abstaining from this. OK, so it's so stupid, complicated. Trump says don't pay these things out. A lower court says you have to pay him out. Not literally, but technically. It's so weird. All right, let's try this again. Trump says don't pay this out. A lower court says we're freezing that order.

So that means they have to get paid out. Trump appeals to the appellate court who says we have no jurisdiction. The Supreme Court then issues a temporary stay so that the money isn't being spent. And then just the other day, the Supreme Court said we're vacating the stay. The lower court is going to do your thing, which means Trump now has to post haste pay two billion dollars. The federal government does under the presumption, as Trump has issued this order, that it's fraudulent. There's been no ruling on the merits.

People are arguing that the work was already completed, so it has to be paid. But can we stop and ask about what the work was when we're talking about someone getting a contract to teach gender studies? Or how about this? Throw that out. You want to make the argument that someone proposed, I'll do gender studies for $10 million. You want to pay them fine. They did the work. How about that? What about an empty migrant facility?

$18 million per month going to an empty facility. Now, I don't know that that was actually USAID funding, but when you have things like that, perhaps Trump can say, I ain't paying that. Somebody was funneling money to a buddy for bunk reasons. And you can't simply argue, but work was done.

Oh, OK. Let me let me offer this up to you, to all the liberals and Democrats defending these programs. How about you tell that to the IRS? Come on, let's play this game. When you send your buddy a million dollars every month and his job is listed as migrant services and they found out, find out his office is empty. There's nobody there.

Home isn't even living anywhere near the area. Let's see. Let's see you play the game and tell the IRS that the questions I got for these nonprofits is where's the IRS in this regard? All that money being funneled around and there's no investigation by the IRS. I'll let you guys understand. I'll let you know if you did, as I described, the IRS will come after you so fast your head will spin. So when Donald Trump sees these programs and says stop payment, we should stop payment. Now, here's the best part.

Here's the best part. Despite the fact that Donald Trump is being blocked, sort of, by the Supreme Court, they're basically doing nothing. So it's not like they're literally saying pay the money. They're saying we out. At the State of the Union address, the not so State of the Union State of the Union, Trump said thank you very much to John Roberts, won't forget it.

And now there's a great conspiracy theory. No joke. Trump's responded saying, I was thanking him for swearing me in. Like, thank you for making me president and doing this. You won't regret it. And they're acting like there's some secret quid pro quo between the Supreme Court and Donald Trump, despite the fact Amy Coney Barrett, John Roberts keep siding against him.

You got to love it, my friends. All right, well, let's jump into the story. Before we do, you got to go to casprew.com. You got to buy Casper Coffee. Ian's Graphene Dream is back in stock. Homies sold 250 packs yesterday. You can't stop him. You can't stop Ian, man.

250 bags of Ian's Graphene Dream sold yesterday. This dude, you're going to see him. Ian's going to pull up in like, I don't know, a Lambo or something with shades and it's going to be all iced up and he's like, and it's because you guys keep buying his coffee. Okay, well, we'll keep buying it. I'm glad you guys like it. It's our best seller now. Appalachian Nights is still number one. Check this out.

You can see how it lines up. Appalachian Nights is still number one, but that's all time. Ian's Graphing Dream is going to take over in a little bit. Go to castbrew.com. And don't forget to also go to rumble.com slash timcast IRL. Join Rumble Premium using promo code TIM10. And you'll get the Green Room podcast. Do I have the Green Room show? Let me pull this up for you guys. Here we go.

Last night we had 6-7 Kevin talking about the things he'd seen. Yo, this dude's great. Yesterday he was explaining how Oakland has become like the Wild West and how he's gone on the ground. He's telling these crazy stories of going to the border and smugglers and then it's like the craziest place he's ever been to is Oakland, California.

Under Democrat leadership, it's now the Wild West. So that was a really interesting conversation. Plus, we got all of the other Green Room behind-the-scenes podcasts. You don't want to miss it. It's starting to get livening up. We got a couple people joining the team. More people are hanging out. And so it's going to be a little bit more unfamily-friendly and spicy and funny. But become a member of Rumble Premium to watch that show.

Smash the like button. Share the show right now with everyone you know. Hey, if you really do like the work that I do in this morning show, we are not like Fox News or CNN or MSNBC. We don't have billions of dollars from who knows where carriage fees, I guess, to just pump into crazy marketing, though we have been doing some.

If you believe that we are better than CNN, then copy the URL to this live stream and share it wherever you can. Tell people to subscribe. You guys should subscribe. Join the show. Join our discord server at Timcast dot com to get active. Let's read the news. Trump considers criminal charges for USAID staff after Doge uncovered wild abuse. Oh, and I got it pulled up for you guys.

Federal workers at USAID could find themselves behind bars for fraud after Doge uncovered a massive spending scandal at the program. Daily Mail has learned Peter Morocco, deputy administrator designated USAID, provided the House Foreign Affairs Committee with a briefing on Capitol Hill Wednesday while discussing the review of foreign aid implemented by President Donald Trump.

Morocco told the committee he is considering sending criminal recommendations to the Justice Department regarding actions within USAID being exposed by Elon Musk's Doge. Apparently, there's still judicial action that has even come out as late as this morning. Rep Keith Self, Texas, who was in the meeting, told the Daily Mail they intend to refer USAID officials to the DOJ. Oh, boy. Nothing. He shared, noting how fraud is a criminal act. Indeed, it is. The

The Republicans shared that Morocco left open the possibility that both USAID workers and grant recipients could be recommended for crimes. Let's go. The recipients I want to see get locked up. And that's why my friends over in. Oh, you know, we should do. You know, we haven't done in a little bit. Let's go to Google Trends. I don't even think about this. We'll go to Google Trends. Let's let's explore Google Trends. We'll try a criminal lawyer. Oh, I love this one.

Trending now. Criminal lawyer. Did you guys see this? And then we'll jump down here and we'll type in District of Columbia. Let's see what we got. We got a couple spikes in the past couple of days. Past day is always super low. We got to go past week. Let's see what we got. All right. It's kind of chilled out, it looks like. But we do have a massive spike here. Let's take it back 30 days. Criminal lawyer. Oh, my heavens me.

So right around the time Doge began digging in, criminal lawyer has spiked from nothing in the D.C. area to who? I wonder what that correlates to. Uh-huh. Very interesting. There are some other search terms I won't bring up. But actually, why don't we do this? Let's let's try a fraud fraud. Let's see it ends with fraud fraud.

So this this does skew things a little bit. But, you know, I don't know. Fraud seems to be popping up a little bit. We'll see. We'll see. I think these people are going to jail. I think Loudoun County, Virginia, is largely propped up by illicit programs. How much you want to bet some dude's buddy got a grant from the government for some BS because his buddy like this is how it works.

Someone's rich and they say, hey, I'm going to back you for Congress. I'm going to put money in your campaign. The guy says, OK, I'm going to make sure that we can get a grant to your nonprofit where you're on the board. And that's the game that's being played with D.C. And where does that money come from? Well, to be honest, it's it's it's technically your tax dollars.

But I don't like saying tax dollars because that's not the way that modern monetary theory works. It's basically the U.S. prints money and extracts it whenever they see fit and just rips your buying power away from you. So it's technically your tax dollars, but really it's just causing inflation to give money to people who shouldn't get it so they don't have to do any work. And that's Loudoun County for you. Here we go.

If they are detecting outright fraud, not just bad programs, not just ignoble programs, not just programs that don't support the national interest of the United States. If they're finding fraud, then absolutely the wrongdoers should be prosecuted. Rep self said, I'm here for it. I love this. Take a look at these protesters. People hold placards as the USAID building sits closed to employees is on February 3rd. There are a bunch of protests I've seen.

You'll notice that most of the Democrats who are protesting in favor of USAID call it USAID. And they're under the impression USAID provides foreign aid. It's not. It's the U.S. Agency for International Development. And what is international development? I don't know. It means like instead of, say, fixing the roads or the bridges in your town, we're going to send billions of dollars overseas for gender studies. Not a joke.

I got to pull it up. We'll get to it. Doge actually just suspended payments where they were giving half a million dollars to make mice transgender. Indeed, CNN claimed Trump was lying when he claimed that the money was being spent to make mice transgender. And oh, boy, they had to issue a correction. I kid you not. Let me say that again. CNN had to issue a correction to

When they claimed they said Trump falsely said that the government was funding transgender mice and then shortly after said, oops, and removed it. Yeah, they tried to add in context. Sure. Now, let me ask you, who are these people? I mean, maybe these people work there. And so fine, I get it. But, yo, most Americans, especially as liberals, they don't know what USAID is.

You got a group of protesters out in Charleston, Charlestown, West Virginia. Don't make the mistake. Charleston and Charlestown are two different cities. We had one incident where a prominent individual was told to come to Charlestown. And then he texted us saying he was here. And in fact, he was in Charleston some six hours away. I digress. There are some people protesting. You know, I maybe want to send a camera guy down there and ask him, what does USAID stand for and what do they do?

Because they're going to tell you it's U.S. foreign aid. They're giving food and water to starving children. That's probably what they'll say. I mean, honestly, they'll probably say, I don't know. And I'll say, OK, then why do you want it to have money? That's that's that's insane, isn't it? Indeed, it is. So I don't know who these people are defending it other than cultists. Self noted that Morocco and USAID would not share their plans for criminal recommendations unless they had a rock solid paper trail.

You're going to have to have a paper trail to prove that self-added. And I doubt that they would refer anyone without a very strong paper trail. Another source in the meeting who spoke with Daily Mail confirmed the potential legal action. Morocco briefed the full House Foreign Affairs Committee, Democrats and Republicans, that the waste, fraud and abuse at USAID was more severe than initially presumed. He told lawmakers that multiple referrals to the DOJ for criminal prosecution were being considered. Let's go.

The conduct in question arose because of USAID's decentralized accountability system that often left grantees on the ground using American tax dollars in ways that were both inappropriate and potentially illegal. Though Secretary of State Marco Rubio has been tasked to lead USAID, Morocco is the one running point on many of the agency's operations. Well, you know, the former agency, I would say. Thousands of employees have been put on administrative leave after Musk noted that the agency was rotten to the core with fraud.

The House Foreign Affairs Committee held a hearing last month about the wasteful spending found at USAID in the State Department. During the session, Republicans decried frivolous projects like, quote, $2 million to conduct sex change surgeries in Guatemala through a trans-led organization. Why? Why?

Why are we two million dollars? I got an idea. How about I always got these proposals instead of giving two million dollars for sex changes in Guatemala. We do a lottery for combat veterans who were injured, wounded, disabled, and somebody wins two million dollars. How about that? I mean, Democrats would probably oppose it, which is insane. But sure. Here we go. We got more. Oh, twenty two million dollars.

to increase tourism in Tunisia and Egypt. Why? Why don't we increase tourism to like Palm Beach or Gatlinburg? Come on. $22 million? Democrats argue that USAID's spending is critical to forward U.S. objectives abroad and have recently noted that Musk and Trump's handling of the agency has provoked fears of Ebola spreading due to USAID funding for prevention programs being halted.

Let me tell you the truth, okay, guys? Can I tell you the truth? I'm going to tell you the truth. There's two big reasons that they spend this money the way they do. Two big reasons. The first, the money doesn't actually go to sex changes, and you know it. It's going to the politicians and their kickbacks. The U.S. can't say we're bribing Guatemalan officials, right? Right. So what they do is they say we're issuing a grant for some reason.

Maybe they could have chosen a better one than this. And the money likely gets siphoned off to prominent politicians and individuals or taken as taxes and they get a kickback. You know what I'm saying? The other reason is this. This one has been a big talking point for some time. It is to prop up the petrodollar. If everybody in the world has dollars, they want the dollars to value to have value. Right. So let's say only the U.S. and India use dollars.

If you went to some guy and said, we'll give you a million dollars, they'll be like, OK, it's only good in two countries. The BRICS currency is useful everywhere. Maybe I'll take it, but it's not as valuable, right?

But if you go to India and India is sitting on a billion dollars, they want to use that. The idea is if we give 10 different countries, yikes, that's crazy breaking news. If we give 10 different countries U.S. dollars, they all want things for it. They'll trade it amongst each other. So the U.S. is trying to strengthen the petrodollar by giving money to corrupt individuals all around the world so that they're incentivized to use it with each other,

We control the production of it. It's a racket, ain't it? Democrats argue that USAID spending is critical to forward U.S. objectives abroad and have recently noted that Musk and Trump's handling of the agency has provoked fears of Ebola spreading to the USAID funding. We read that one. This week, the Supreme Court ruled that $2 billion in USAID funding that Trump froze would have to be thawed and delivered. They didn't explicitly say that. They said, we out. So they removed a stay on a freeze on...

It's on a Trump order to stop payment, which means the order to stop payment is unfrozen and the payment must go through. Despite the fact the lower court's ruling is a temporary restraining order, which means that theoretically, if Trump proves in the merits, the money was fraudulent, they have to return the money, but the money will already be given out. It's nuts. Nuts.

Last week, U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols rejected pleas that came in a lawsuit from employees to keep a temporary block on the government's plan. The agency also was cutting U.S.-based workforce by about 2,000 employees. Now, that's all fine and dandy. But my friends, y'all heard about how the IRS might fire 45,000 of its 90,000 workforce. I'm going to say this to all of you. Anybody who was mad about that, we can't be friends.

The IRS gutting half its workforce. Ron Paul, I can just imagine him sitting in his living room in a rocking chair with a cup of coffee and he turns the TV on and it's Donald Trump saying the IRS is putting a plan together to lay off half its workforce, 45,000 people in a single tier and a smile on Ron Paul's face. Maybe not. Maybe he just started busting out laughing and slapping his leg while playing the spoons. But let's take a look at where we currently are.

With Doge and USAID. Let's talk about USAID waste and abuse. Now, they don't go as far as a fraud because frog is a legal crime. And I put it this way. I would call it semantic or colloquial fraud. That's how I explained it yesterday. You know what we mean when we say fraud. OK.

If some dude sets a nonprofit and then a month later says, give me $10 million so I can research sloths crossing the street to protect the animals. And then the government's like, sure thing, buddy. Here's $10 million. And then homie pays himself a million dollar a year salary. And we're sitting there going like, how much work is good? Come on.

It's fraud. OK, it may not be deception because the guy said, I'll do my best. No guarantees. I save a sloth. And the government agreed to it so they can say it was all above board. No one was deceived. The American people were because behind our backs, you were extracting our buying power. And for what? Here we go.

They say for decades, USAID has been unaccountable to taxpayers. It funnels massive sums of money to the ludicrous and in many cases, malicious pet projects entrenched of entrenched bureaucrats with next to no oversight. For example, oh man, here we go. 1.5 million to advance diversity, equity and inclusion in Serbia's workplaces. $70,000 for production of a DEI musical in Ireland. 2.5 million for electric vehicles for Vietnam.

Why? Well, I'm going to pause real quick. Is there information on this one? Because I'd like to see. Are they? I'm curious. Two point five million for electric vehicles. Who are they buying them from? Then you start to get some of this right. They get two point five million dollars. Vietnam then orders from what? Honda, Tesla, Chrysler, whatever. Perhaps, perhaps. Oh, forty seven thousand for a transgender opera in Colombia.

32,000 for a transgender comic book in Peru. That sounds like they gave one dude a grant. Two million dollars for sex changes and LGBT activism in Guatemala. Well, heavens, what would we do without it? Hundreds of thousands, millions, millions. Oh, boy. Oh, boy. Wow. How about this one? You ready for this? San Antonio nonprofit targeted by Doge defends spending while migrant shelter was empty. Migrant shelter was empty. Now, OK, let's pause for a little, little, little bit.

Just because empty doesn't mean it's not being utilized. Right. I mean, let's say you build a shelter and it's being funded and it needs to remain open in the event you need to shelter migrants. And then guess what? Trump deports them all. You can then say, guess we'll shut down this facility. But what happens if more of my illegal immigrants cross the border? Well, now you don't have a facility. Right. So maybe it makes sense or maybe it's all one big scam. Here's the story from from News 4 San Antonio.

They write our news for I-team. Waste Watch report about a San Antonio nonprofit sparked outrage on social media. The group was paid $18 million a month to operate a shelter for migrant teenagers, despite it being empty for a year. Come on. Does anybody really believe this is legitimate? I don't. High Avila's report on endeavors was viewed millions of times after being posted by Elon Musk.

His Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, initially uncovered the group's contract and had it canceled. Endeavors established in the 1960s provided housing and wellness services for military veterans and the homeless. In 2021, its mission and its revenues expanded when it landed a government contract to house unaccompanied migrant teenagers. The teenagers...

The teens, age 13 to 17, were housed in a shelter in Pecos in West Texas, where they received medical care and counseling, including visits from therapy dogs and gardening activities. Well, OK. I mean, that sounds like we got something going on. These are minors, right? What seems to be the problem? 2021 federal disclosure forms show $533,000 went to pay for music therapy. You know, teenagers need rock and roll, baby. Maybe some metalcore. Some all that remains.

A source with endeavors who did not want to be identified due to restrictions in the government contract said the therapy was necessary because the teens from Honduras and other countries had been through traumatizing experiences. Indeed, perhaps Adam's Song by Blink-182 could help them come to realize that life is an adventure.

At the time, the unaccompanied minors were sleeping on the floor of customs and border protection facilities due to an overwhelming immigration surge. The Endeavor's shelter was occupied from March of 21 to March of 23, and again from September 23 to February 24.

During those periods, Endeavor said it served 40,000 unaccompanied minors. In March of 24, when the government stopped using the shelter, Endeavor says its expenses continued because the contract required it to stay at 24-7 operational readiness, paying to lease the property, medical facilities, vaccine refrigeration, and hundreds of cameras required for security.

In a post on Exodo, he said turning the contract saves taxpayers $215 million annually. Indeed. And with Donald Trump gutting and ending illegal immigration. Good. Now, hold on there a minute. Why was it empty? According to some reports, it was made empty because the conditions were extremely squalid. Is that the right word?

Let's pull up. Let's see if we can find this. Endeavor's shutdown conditions. So I believe it was Fox News who. Oh, you can't do because Endeavor's going to Endeavor flight attendants protest equal pay. Oh, that was the plane that crashed. Remember, migrant facility, San Antonio Doge. I believe it was Fox News said that the conditions were so horrible that they had to shut it down.

Doge says Texas nonprofit with former Biden transition team members reaped millions operating empty facility. Indeed. Oh, and by the way, breaking news, they're going to censure Al Green for screaming at Donald Trump based. Let's see. Cash portfolio investments were massive. This has got even more juicy details. Doge said a former U.S. ICE employee.

joined Family Endeavors in early 21, where they helped the organization secure a sole-source HHS contract for overflow housing from licensed care facilities. Since March of 24, they paid $18 million a month to keep it operational, despite it being empty, used for housing for unaccompanied migrant children that was previously at the center of reports of poor conditions. The payments continued. So that was my understanding in the reporting. Basically, the conditions were poor, and you've got to wonder...

How many other contracts like this are completely illegitimate? Oh, boy. Strap in, boys. $375 billion EPA slush fund handled by John Podesta gave billions to charities founded only months earlier. You want to come to me and tell me that's legitimate? I'm going to call shenanigans. Let's grab this story, my friends. But don't forget to smash that like button. Share the show. Let's read.

The Biden admin funneled at least $20 billion into environmental groups, most of which had only recently been founded. The post is discovered. Some are arguing that this was a last minute panicked,

operational slush fund that before with Biden being like they knew Biden was going to lose and they were like, we need a backup plan. And that backup plan was send billions of dollars through circuitous means to various NGOs so that they could use it to fund Democrats down the line to compete with Trump in the midterms. I'm not saying that's true. Just some speculation from the Internet. They don't want to say.

In one case, former Vice President Kamala Harris handed over a check for nearly $7 billion to Bethesda, Maryland-based group Climate United Fund, which does not appear in the IRS's charities database and has no federal filings. Let's go, baby. Come on. You know what's going on. I know what's going on. They know what's going on.

Kamala Harris handed over $7 billion to a charity that does not appear in the IRS database with no filings. Shenanigans. The nonprofit fund had only been incorporated in Delaware on November 30th, 2023, according to public records. Five months before, Harris handed over the cash in 24. Are you kidding me?

They file. Five months later, Kamala Harris gives them $7 billion. That's a B right there, ladies and gentlemen. Billion. DOJ, Pam Bondi Cash need to rip that to shreds. I'm saying full-on investigation, every book, binder, dresser, whatever you name it, every office, every person, we got to figure out what that's all about.

The Climate United Fund then announced the historic investment in a press release, noting the group's work delivers benefits like cleaner air and increased energy security. However, because the company is so new, there's no publicly published accounting of how it plans to spend the $7 billion. Projects have been announced, including $10.8 million pre-development loan solar project on tribal lands in eastern Oregon and Idaho,

and a $32 million solar energy project at the University of Arkansas. But they represent only a drop in the bucket of the grant's amount. Ethically speaking, it's concerning, said Lori Styron, CEO of Charity Watch, an independent charity watchdog group.

What was the purpose of creating middlemen entities when there are so many established groups in the climate space with good track records? What was the value added in by doing it this way, especially with such large sums of taxpayer funds?

The cash for the charity came from a huge $370 billion climate slush fund of taxpayer money overseen by John Podesta, a political consultant who was chair of Hillary Clinton's failed 2016 bid for president and White House chief of staff to Bill Clinton. Interesting. I warn all of you not to look up Andrew Bart's comments on John Podesta. Anyway, moving on.

In 2022, President Joe Biden named Podesta the helm of the Climate Fund, which resulted from the Inflation Reduction Act, a 2022 law that was aimed at combating climate change and creating clean energy. Last year, EPA advisor Brent Efron was caught on video describing how the agency hastily parceled out a related $20 billion climate fund that was held by Citibank before the end of the Biden administration.

Get the money out as fast as possible before they come in. It's like we're on the Titanic and we're throwing gold bars off the edge, he said in a video posted by online activist group Project Veritas. Remember when I said that, my friends? How did I describe it? I said, baby, we're on the Titanic and they are stealing the China and running for the lifeboats. That was the game. They knew years in advance. Here's what I think. I think they knew with Trump's victory in 2016, he wasn't supposed to win.

They had lost control. Who's the deep state, the bureaucratic state, the intelligence agencies, whatever you want to call it. They had lost control of the narrative machine and they knew they were done. 2020 was a last ditch effort. They knew they could not do it twice, but they needed four years to rip the system to shreds and steal as much as possible. And here we are now. I don't know if they're going to go to jail or get caught or how this plays out. My my bet will be Patsy's will take the fall.

But we'll see, man. Efron was acting in his private capacity when he made the comments, which expressed his personal views. An attorney representing him said Mark S. Zaid told the Post. He also claimed the comments had nothing to do with the funds which had been administered. Now, Lee Zeldin, the new EPA chief, said he wants to claw back the cash doled out by the climate fund. On Monday, he called on the agency's inspector general to investigate.

The Biden EPA gold bar scheme was designed to limit government oversight while doling out funds to far left organizations pushing DEI and environmental justice. Zeldin told the Post in a statement of the eight pass through entities that received funding from the pot of 20 billion in tax dollars. Various recipients have shown very little qualification to handle a single dollar, let alone several billions of dollars. I have zero tolerance for waste and abuse at the EPA.

A spokeswoman for the Climate United Fund told the Post that the Biden told the Post the Biden controlled EPA encouraged groups to work with coalitions to receive the cash. She said that the EPA cash of the Climate United Fund is parked with Calvert Impact, a related nonprofit. Oh, boy. The Post found three entities called Calvert Impact, all of them based in Bethesda, making it more difficult to track the flow of money. How about that? Another example, the similarly named Justice Climate Fund, which

I love it. They're just recycling the same names now. It's a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit, which was set up in 2023, has yet to submit a tax filing to the IRS, and has no information about its principles on its website. The group received $940 million from the EPA. It lists its aims as working with community partners to drive transformative investments focused on reducing pollution, among other goals. I got a pitch. Okay.

To the Trump administration. How about this? There's a group that it's a nonprofit. And actually, I want to make sure I get the name right. So let me let me let me make sure I can pull this one up because there's there's two names. There's two names. They do great work. Let's let's grab this hard. Here we go. And I want to make sure I get the name right.

There are two organizations. There's O'Keefe Media Group, which we know, and they have another one because there's a nonprofit arm, and I want to make sure I get the name right. O'Keefe Media Group, I believe, is James O'Keefe's for-profit. So one could say the federal government could contract the O'Keefe Media Group for certain jobs. But what about

Giving them money, I'm pretty sure is I'm pretty sure O'Keefe Media Group is a is a is a for profit business. It doesn't mean that he's operating just for profit. But I think James has. Is this it? Yes, it's the Citizen Journalism Foundation. There we go, baby. Donate to CJF today. Let's pull up James O'Keefe. I got a pitch. If they're going to be sending seven billion dollars or more to their cronies about this.

Is there perhaps a mis- and disinformation fund? Maybe. Maybe the federal government could give James O'Keefe $7 billion. Oh, my God. Could you imagine what James could do with $7 billion? O'Keefe Media Group would operate forever. Let's do this. Let's say that—what are the current interest rates? What are current interest rates for savings?

Let's just do this. Let's give James O'Keefe an endowment of $7 billion. They want to play these games. I'll play these games. We're looking at 0.41. It's pretty low. Let's say James puts $7 billion in cash. Let's say if I put...

$7 billion in cash in a bank at 0.41%. How much do I earn per month? We'll ask the old robot the question and see how much can we give James O'Keefe? Because you know he deserves it. You guys should check out the Citizen Journalism Fund. He's doing great work, man. Big fan. Big fan. Uh-oh. ChatGP knows where we're going. It doesn't like that we're playing this game. We'll let it... ChatGPT sucks. They just freeze.

Okay, here we go. You would earn $2.3 million per month in interest. Let's just do this. We'll take the $7 billion. We'll grant it to an account. And the money can't be spent by James. Nobody can have the interest. Yeah, let's the government interest alone would give James 2. Yes, it's 2.39 million per month.

It's $25 million a year. That's the game they were playing. Now, I'm joking. Well, I'm half joking. I'd love it if Citizen Journalism Fund actually got a massive multi-billion dollar grant like that because I think James does good work. That being said, if we're talking about a group getting $940 million from the EPA and you've got the Climate Justice Fund and the Justice Climate Fund, oh boy.

This is what they're doing. When you get $7 billion, you don't need to use that money right away. You put into various accounts. And let's be honest, like nobody's putting in a standard savings account. You can put in a high yield account. What's let's let's see, like what's current high yield savings interest? I'm pretty sure it's higher than that. It's probably like one point something. You begin five million bucks per month. High yield could be. Whoa.

National average is 0.41, but some institutions provide competitive rates up to 4.75% or higher. Holy crap. Oh, yeah. Look at that. Open Bank has a 4.7, 0.41. That's wrong. All right, baby, let's increase it by an order of magnitude. You put $7 billion on the books for James O'Keefe. He's cranking out $20 million per month in interest alone. Insane.

And then he can just take the $2 million, leave the rest, and let it compound.

This is nuts. Understand they are creating permanent funding sources for their criminal enterprise. That is my opinion over where money like this ends up. I'm not saying I don't know nothing about this justice, climate fund, climate justice, whatever they're doing. I'm saying the grand scheme of things with the funneling of this money, in my opinion, is that they know they can put it to high yield savings and not even that. That's stupid. They can put it into stocks.

Nancy Pelosi could tell him exactly where they got to put the money and they're going to make bank. It is infinite power to wage a resistance. Trump is going after this. Understand the reason why right now Trump's mission is largely Doge and why it's so important. He knows the deep state and the bureaucratic state are using this to provide themselves resources indefinitely that you will never compete with. You can't.

Come on. You get paid. You put your paycheck in the bank. What interest do you get? 20 bucks a month if you're lucky and a high yield savings. They're getting 20 million. Insane. Uh-oh, there's more.

Another third group, Power Forward Communities, Inc., was registered in 2023 and shows a total of just $100 in tax revenue in its tax filing for the year, according to public filings. Yet the Columbia, Maryland-based nonprofit somehow received $2 billion from the EPA fund. Holy crap. $2 billion. That's a B, ladies and gentlemen.

The group said. So what could they pull off with that? Seven seven million dollars a month. The group said it is part of a coalition of five other charities, including United Way Worldwide and Rewiring America, Washington, D.C. based nonprofit, which announced former Democratic Rep Stacey Abrams would work as its corporate counsel in 23. Interesting.

However, rewiring America only registered as a corporate entity a year later in Delaware in December of 24, according to public records. As a February, a February 24th press release from the power forward communities says the group has already committed 539 million to expand and preserve affordable housing, improve air quality and create good paying jobs by ramping up energy efficiency across the country.

Tim Mayopoulos, the former CEO of the housing financial company Fannie Mae and a Democratic donor, is listed as the group's interim president and CEO. He contributed $5,600 to Joe Biden's presidential campaign in 2020. Federal filings show. Power Forward Communities has no list of board members on its website, but does list job openings for government affairs, VP of communications, blah, blah, blah.

Just as Climate Fund and Power Forward Communities did not return the post's calls requesting comment. Maybe because there's nobody there who actually does communications and the emails just go unanswered.

The FBI and the DOJ have both launched investigations into the grants and bank accounts holding billions of dollars have been frozen as the EPA attempts to get it back. The New York Times reported Tuesday. Let's go. Donald Trump, Lee Zeldin, Elon Musk. You are doing the Lord's work. Bless your hearts. Look at this man. Look at this story. A nonprofit forms and then with no tax filings with with only just reason they get seven billion dollars. They got caught.

They have frozen the money. Based. This is a message from sponsor Intuit TurboTax. Taxes was dealing with piles of paperwork and frustrating forms and then waiting and wondering and worrying if you were ever going to get any money back.

Now, Taxes is easily uploading your forms to a TurboTax expert who's matched to your unique tax situation. An expert who's backed by the latest technology, which cross-checks millions of data points for 100% accuracy. While they work on your taxes, you get real-time updates on their progress.

And you get the most money back guaranteed. All while you go about your day. No stressing, no worrying, no waiting. Now this is taxes. Intuit TurboTax. Get an expert now on TurboTax.com. Only available with TurboTax Live Full Service. Real-time updates only in iOS mobile app. See guarantee details at TurboTax.com forward slash guarantees.

I got an idea. Guys, how about this? Instead of giving $7 billion, we break it up and give 1,000, or actually, I suppose we could do 7,000 disabled veterans each get a million dollars. How does that sound? I like it. Was my math right on that one? I think my math is right on that one.

That would be based. Or we could just give one guy $7 billion. I don't know how crazy things would go if he did that, though, right? Just like one random disabled vet and be like, here's $7 billion. He'd be like, actually, I think it's a good idea. You know what? I say that. I say, Trump,

Give a tunnels to towers. Give them seriously. Give them seven billion dollars. Problem solved. You put that money in a bank, like I already said, at four percent if you're doing a high yield savings or you're doing bonds or whatever and you're pumping out 20, 30 million. How many you could buy 50 houses per year for disabled vets and for the families of fallen soldiers and first responders?

I will tell you this. The one thing that I really despise the most about our current structure of society and, you know, I try to be careful because I understand the structure of the market society is just the way it is largely. But it always really pissed me off that disabled firefighters, police officers, soldiers, first responders get nothing.

I mean, it's not like they get literal nothing, right? There's funds to help them. But I always just like, bro, there's a dude playing baseball right now who's worth millions of dollars. He's got seven homes. And I'm not trying to drag the guy, right? Any of these professional sports players who are wealthy. So let's do this. I'll leave the sports guys out of it. Can you believe, can you believe it? That there are

Permanent children who complain on camera to millions of people every day. They aren't running into burning buildings. They aren't fighting our wars. They aren't pulling children out of the rubble. No, they sit there in their stupid beanies complaining and they make tons of money. Meanwhile, the first responders, you get my point. My point has always been the structure of our society. I'm OK with taxes and I'll tell you why.

I think taxes are misappropriated. I think they're spent poorly. This proves it. The government is corrupt. My beautiful dream of a country is like, yo, if you're an EMT and you're like rushing in to save someone's life from a car wreck and then like the gas tank blows at it and it like your arm gets struck and then you're like permanently paralyzed in your left arm, yo,

You know, I think that person should just get a ton of money like we're we are going to make sure you want for nothing. If you're in a family of a 9-11 first responder or 9-11 first responder, you should want for nothing. You should be the ultimate sacrifices made by the bravest and most honorable and noble of people in this country are under that they are underserved. You could when you come back from combat, if you're a military veteran, you should you should want for very little.

I'm not saying combat veterans deserve to be multimillionaire billionaires, but you should have more than some guy who complains on the internet. But look, I'm not going to fault the market for being what it is. I am going to say this. Look where our money goes. It goes to slush funds for corrupt politician warmongers who actually put brave men and women in a line of fire for BS reasons, push war for the sake of profit so that they can live and be kings and manipulate the public. That's really what it's all about. Money is power.

They don't really care about the hard currency. They care about the access and control. That's why some people who they want to be in politics because it's comparable power. Some people want to be famous. It's comparable power. I say this.

$375 billion to corrupt crackpots. I'd rather see a billion dollars in the hand of 375 disabled veterans just to be billionaires. Your family will take care of. Thank you for your sacrifice. I wish our society focused more on that. Again, not going to fault the market for being what it is, but it always did irk me that firefighters get paid less than professional athletes, despite the fact that we have volunteer firefighters. Can you believe this? I'm sorry, man. I got to say this. Volunteer fire departments. You guys are amazing.

We got we got a bunch out here in West Virginia. I, you know, I show up sometimes when they do these cookoffs. I'll give big donations. It's crazy to me that there are people out there who will have golden toilets figuratively. And it's because they play sports or they wrote a song. Well,

With all due respect to musicians, man, you wrote a song and now you get millions of dollars. You are loved and cherished by all. And that dude volunteered on the weekends to run into burning buildings to save children, to save families, to protect our communities. It's just wild to me. Just wild to me.

I'm not going to fault the market. I'll say it again, because I don't like communist solutions. If the market wants select musicians to be rich and famous, so be it. I just think we can have kind of a little bit of mixed economy and stop giving money to crony corrupt individuals. And then like we shouldn't have to have Jon Stewart before Congress banging his fist on the table, demanding that we allocate funding to 9-11 first responders. I will always give the man respect for that because I would do the same. It is it is laughably insane to me and disrespectful that

A fight had to happen for 9-11 first responders. Can you believe that? The EPA said the air was safe to breathe. It was not. And these brave men, firefighters who ran to that building and then it collapsed on them and their families should not have to deal with these problems and fight politically while from a wheelchair on a respirator while these scumbag mother are taking seven billion dollars for their garbage BS nonprofits. Man, that stuff really pisses me off.

Anyway, you get my point on all of that. I'm sure a lot of you agree. Whatever. This is why I get pissed about all this stuff, because we hear these stories every day. I watch those Tunnels to Towers commercials, man. That nonprofit is fantastic. I watch it when they're like, Dave Portnoy does the one bite pizza reviews. And then Dave's like, you guys are great, man. I love what you're doing. And I'm like, I love what they're doing, too.

And there's one story, a woman, she's like, my husband got cancer and died. I get a call. They say, we're gonna take care of your mortgage for you. And I'm like, that's amazing. Why do we rely on begging the public and private, the private sector doing these things while at the same time, at the

These Democrat politicians were giving out billions of dollars to their cronies. Talk about backwards and corrupt. Let's fix this. So shout out to Zeldin, to Trump, to Elon, to the entire Doge team, to Marco Rubio, to all of those working on shutting this crap down, freezing these accounts and saying you ain't getting a penny. Well, here's the latest controversy.

My friends, the Supreme Court has denied Trump's request to block two billion in foreign aid. It's a little more complicated to just say that the Supreme Court's forcing him to pay it. Basically, by refusing to intervene, a lower court's ruling stopping Trump's stop orders is so convoluted. OK, so they're going to pay two billion dollars and they call it foreign aid. These people are evil. They're they're stupid and they're evil. It's not foreign aid. That's a lie. Lie, lie, lie, lie, lie. It's it's USAID. USAID.

So the Supreme Court doesn't want to intervene. In a brief unsigned opinion, the court noted that February 26th deadline for the government to make the payments had already passed, instructed the U.S. District Attorney Judge Amir Ali to clarify what obligations the government must fulfill to ensure compliance with the temporary restraining order that Ali has entered into the case, paying attention to how feasible it is for the government to comply with those timelines.

Ali's expected to hold a hearing on the aid group's motion for a preliminary injunction, which, if granted, would suspend the freeze on foreign assistance. Yeah. Gender studies, foreign assistance. Uh huh. Let's go. Let's go back. Come on. Thirty two thousand dollars for a transgender comic book. Foreign assistance. Oh, you see how they lie. You see how they're lying to you. They're lying to you. They're lying to you. I can't stand these people.

$32,000 for a transgender play or whatever that said. Give $32,000 to any random firefighter. And I'll say, okay, any random one. I don't care. You pull lottery back. Congratulations. Here's 32 grand. Buy yourself a car. You deserve it. Any cop, any EMT, any soldier. Here's a bonus. You deserve it.

I don't care if the soldier is enlisted and he moves boxes all day from one building to another. He deserves it more than than gender studies in what was it, Peru? Was that what it was? I'm sorry. Transgender comic book in Peru. I can't stand this stuff, dude. He's going to hold this hearing for the courts. Conservative justice would have granted the government's request to put the order on hold. So basically what happens is.

if the order is Trump's order is frozen by a lower court, which they don't have the authority to do, which is so insane. And the Supreme Court needed to assert that that's what Alito was basically saying. That means Trump's going to have to pay this or the federal government will have to pay it. The question then becomes if the payments are illegal and a court is ordering Trump to engage in an illegal action, Trump's going to have to say no. And then the question becomes, how do they enforce it? Trump, as the president said, we are not paying this out.

If a court ruled in the merits, I would agree Trump should pay it 100 percent. But the idea that Trump said, hold on there a minute. This looks bunk. This is not legitimate. And then a court said, no, no, pay it anyway. I say shenanigans. If the executive branch, which is which is tasked with enforcing the law, says pause, the court order should be a stay until the merits are ruled upon, meaning don't do anything. Don't spend the money. Don't pay it out. We need to run the merits.

What they're saying now is Trump's freeze is suspended. So the payments must resume. That makes literally no sense. The court should say we should not move anything. We should hear the merits of the case to determine whether or not the money is legitimate and then decide whether or not Trump is right or wrong. That would be a real check on the executive power. That's not what they're doing. They're saying outright Trump can't freeze what he views as illegal payments. Let's let's let's try this another way.

A corporation is caught having smuggled in, let's say, 50 kilos of fentanyl. And Trump says, freeze their bank accounts. And then a lower court says, no, unfreeze their accounts. Trump says, wait, wait, wait, wait. We're in the middle of investigating a crime and a court's going to let them take their money and run. That's insane. What would happen normally is the court would say,

The accounts have been frozen pending an investigation. They would have to argue before the court on the merits of whether or not they are. There's a preponderance of evidence that requires their accounts to be frozen, meaning a due process on the merits of the criminal case against them. The corporation would then say these charges are false. Here's here's our rebuttal. And the judge can then say, I do not believe there is strong enough evidence at this time to freeze this funding. That's not what happened.

They didn't rule on the merits at all. And the question of whether or not they would likely succeed in the merits was did not was not answered either by the Supreme Court, with Alito outright bringing it up in his in his dissent, saying we should actually be issuing a statement on whether or not we believe the executive branch would succeed on the merits. Then we can issue. So they should they need to do it. They need to issue. They need to take the case. They didn't. So I don't know exactly what's going to happen, but I would surmise Trump might say, nice try.

Not happening. Enforce it. We know where these monies like this were going. Nonprofits that just formed getting $7 billion and we're going to pay out $2 billion. The argument they're making is, but it's for work already completed. Yeah. If a dude from McLean, Virginia said, I ran a campaign for climate change and it was a billion dollars, I'd also be like, yeah, dude, that's not real. Okay. Work completed. It's not real work.

Sorry, sue me about it. And that's what should happen. The people who want the money should have to go to court and justify the work they did and prove before the American public. This is the work we do and why it's warranted. And I do think it's fair to a certain degree to say some people maybe maybe maybe some of the work done is like they cleaned windows. OK, we'll pay the people who cleaned the windows. That's fine. But I'd be willing to bet it turns out much of this money is fraudulent nonsense.

So why should it be released? Here's the key point. If Trump's freeze is frozen itself temporarily and the money gets paid out, if they then rule on the merits that Trump was correct, they will never get that money back. And it's yours.

Now, there is still an issue. One might say that's not fair. If someone did real legitimate work and then they're not paid and they have to sue to get it, how is that fair? I go, welcome to business.

That's literally how it goes. That's literally how it goes. There are new. I mean, every single day someone contracts another person. They say, I'll give you five grand to like seal the blacktop on my property. The company does it. The guy comes out and says, whoa, what is this that you did it wrong? It's improper. I'm not paying for this. You got to do it again. I says, no, they go to court over it. That's called a civil dispute. Trump has entered into a civil dispute with these people and they should have to answer for it. Of course,

likely not going to happen because the game is rigged, my friends. But it does seem like Trump and his administration are winning in this regard. Now, I suppose we'll have to save much of this next conspiracy for the next one, the Trump hot mic moment. And the reason why I wasn't initially going to lead with a story like this, but I guess we'll give it its own segment, is because it's so dumb. Trump says, thank you, John Roberts. I won't forget it. And now the left is losing their mind. Look at this one.

Donald Trump rips the mask off of John Roberts court in one sentence.

He said, thank you. You know what I love about this? Trump said thank you to John Roberts. And they're like, that proves it. And it's like, for all you know, like Donald Trump was getting ready for his speech and he was eating a hot dog and a mustard dripped onto his tie. And he was like, oh, I got mustard on my tie right before my big moment. And John Roberts goes, Trump. And he holds up a tie. And then he goes, John, you saved me. Thank you. And then he walks out, shakes hand. I won't forget it.

My point is, he might be thanking John Roberts for something incredibly innocuous. It could have been like Trump didn't have a cell phone charger. And he was like, I want to tweet something. And John was like, he's like, let me go grab a cell phone charger for you. And he's like, are you sure? I'll go grab one for my bag. And he's like, thanks, man. I really appreciate it. And then he plugs in his phone. He's like, hey, man, I won't forget it. It could be something so innocuous. And the Democrats and liberals are like, this proves a grand conspiracy.

At the Supreme Court, get out of here. Roberts just ruled against Trump. These people have lost their minds. You know what can be said, my friends? Smash the like button. Share the show. Get your super chats in. We're going to grab some of your chats and your rumble rants now. Don't forget to subscribe to this channel. And we're live Monday through Thursday at 10 a.m. Within a month or two, it's going to be Monday through Friday because the culture war is going to be moving. We are planning live.

in-studio events where you as members of the TimCast Discord community will sit down in the hot seat and debate us and others. It's a multi-pronged effort.

Go to TimCast.com, click join us, get in the Discord server, and then when we announce these events, we're aiming to do them every week. Maybe it's going to be hard to go every week, but we're aiming for every week. It's going to be expensive because we need a venue for it. The idea is we'll have our debate subjects prepared, we'll have our guests, as we often do, and then we're going to allow members of the Discord community to submit talking points for the debate and

And we will bring you up to sit down in the hot seat and give you a couple of minutes to state your positions. And then we all debate.

The idea is we want to make you guys who are watching active. Many of you watching, you're passive. And that's okay, but we want you to be active. And so a lot of people have asked, how do I get involved? I don't even know where to begin. It's simple. You can go to TimCast.com, join the Discord community, and start talking every day with like-minded individuals. The Discord, it's a chat room with a bunch of different subjects. There's fitness, there's gaming. Podcasts have launched from it. Roman Nation, Quiet Part Podcast are two of them, for instance.

And then you will join the culture war show where we will have a live audience and y'all can come up and join the debate. That way, we also at the same time decentralize the public discourse. There are a lot of prominent individuals that hold big microphones.

And we want to find the people to give them their big break. Right now, I know for a fact there's probably 60, 70, 80, 90, a million. Who knows how many people who are smarter, faster and stronger than I am? And the question is, why aren't they sitting here having this conversation? Why aren't they on the debate stage challenging Ben Shapiro or or David Pakman or whoever else? And for a lot of people, it's just figuring out how to get into the fray.

So we are going to create that moment and create that bridge between the population and the community and the space. Some people might come up and boy, they might their debate points might be real dumb. Some people might come up and hit it out of the park with both humor and insight. And then bang, next thing you know, they got a big YouTube channel, a big rumble channel, a big Spotify podcast, whatever it might be.

Don't forget to also join Rumble Premium for all of our exclusive premium shows like The Green Room. Use promo code Tim10. Let's grab some super chats. We've got a couple minutes. Tim Brackett says, if Trump has to pay the $2 billion, why not do so in installments of like a dollar a month? Indeed, or in pennies. $2 billion in pennies dished out. Got to do something with the pennies. Freeman Dye Freeze says, ignore the Supreme Court decision. They can't legalize fraud just because the fraudsters already performed the work. Interesting.

Let's grab a Rumble rant over here. Let's see. Vincent says, according to your criteria lesson in IRL, LDS is the supplier. You mean superior Christian denomination. I was mostly joking, mostly. The joke I made was we were talking about fertility rates and divorce and all those things. And then I, because Catholics have the lowest, one of the low, well,

Let's just say one of the lowest divorce rates and highest fertility. I said Catholics are the superior Christians, sparking this whole like controversy between Protestants, Catholics and otherwise. And so I was like, should I tweet this? And then Mary laughed and said yes. And then I typed it up and I said, should I do it? And then Phil and Mary were like, do it. I was like, OK. And I tweeted it. It's half tongue in cheek. I do respect Catholics for having low divorce rates. Divorce is cringe. Very, very cringe. Let's go.

Steve overstreets as a shelter was being paid each month, paying each month more. We're saying more paid more each month than my small city in the San Gabriel Valley's annual budget. I am the only IT tech in that city that manages 40 K residents. Wow. Pat Smith just chat said, use grok. I know Chetchy PT is just broken. Jeez. It takes so long. Terrible. Zorro arc graft says, why has ACB been one turn goat to Donald Trump? Uh,

Why she has been turned against Trump of Roe v. Wade ruling does it have to do with when Antifa protested her home and made her kids afraid? Indeed, I had that pulled up as well. So I'll get into that one to break down the Supreme Court conspiracy. Amy Coney Barrett. Yes, since the time that someone threatened the life of Brett Kavanaugh seems to have flipped. And Jack Posobiec makes the argument that she is terrified and there's no protection for her. Yeah.

I don't disagree. So we'll get into all that stuff, my friends. Once again, I ask you all to share the show with everyone you know. You can listen to us on Rumble, of course, and all podcast platforms. So really do appreciate you guys listening. Sharing is caring. Smash the like button. Follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast. Thank you all so much for hanging out. We're back again at noon with another segment and then more for the rest of the day. Thanks for hanging out. We'll see you on the next show.

President Donald Trump was caught on a hot mic, ladies and gentlemen. He never saw it coming. And this proves everything. Oh, yeah, we got him. We got him, ladies and gentlemen. Wait till I play this audio for you. It's going to blow your minds. Look at this Daily Mail with the exclusive Trump's hot mic moment with Supreme Court Justice sparks wild conspiracy theories and he issues a response. I can't believe it.

I can't believe Trump let this one slip. He didn't realize he was mic'd up or there was a mic on these people. And he actually had the nerve to say these things. Wait till you hear this. Roll tape. Thank you again. Thank you again. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? He said, thank you.

I'm not kidding. Trump shook a Supreme Court justice's hand and said, thank you very much. Won't forget it. We got him.

This is exactly what we needed. That proves everything. Take a look at this from the Huffington Post. Donald Trump rips the mask off of John Roberts Court in one sentence. Bang. That's right, ladies and gentlemen. By saying thank you, he proved that there is a deep conspiracy from the court to back Donald Trump or something. OK, I'll drop the act, obviously. Is it are you for real? That's not a hot mic moment. Oh, man.

How many I imagine that new viewers to this channel are going, wait, what's going on? Maybe some liberals got roped into that one for a second. Dude, are you kidding? Donald Trump said, thank you very much. That's it. Yo, I thought the hot Mike moment.

When I see this headline from the Huffington Post, rips the mask off John Roberts court in one sentence, I'm like, wow, what did he say? I thought Trump was going to be on a hot mic leaning in and whispering something like you did a good job in that ruling. Thank you. I'll take care of you or something like that. Something like that. He said, won't forget it. And I'm sitting here being like, what did like John Roberts give him a tie or something like what? Well, Trump responded.

He responded to the conspiracy theory saying that he was thanking John Roberts for swearing him in as president. That's it. And I'm like, uh-huh. I got I'm sorry, liberals, liberals. I'm sorry. All Trump said was thank you very much. Won't forget it. OK, having to post. Take me home. What's going on?

They say as President Donald Trump made his way to Congress following his first speech to the body since for taking office, he stopped to shake hands with four Supreme Court justices in attendance. While shaking the hand of Chief Justice Roberts, he said, thank you again. I won't forget it. Then slap the chief on the back. We got him. He's going to jail now, right?

Roberts is the author of the decision in Trump v. United States, which in July 2024 made it possible for Trump to win the White House in November. The decision granted presidents absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts and in doing so postponed Trump's prosecution for trying to overturn the 2020 election long enough for him to win the election, putting him in the Oval Office and thus beyond the reach of the prosecutors. Roberts gave Trump a get out of jail free card and Trump is grateful. That proves it.

Not really. The Trump, the United States decision in July 24 made it possible for him to win the White House in November. The Supreme Court has ruled on many things for and against Donald Trump. I do not believe Trump is thanking him for this. And even if he is, it's highly speculative nonsense. Are you serious, guys? Man, these people are absolutely nuts.

Trump's appreciation is now Roberts' legacy. Most of you are aware that just the other day, John Roberts ruled against Trump, basically allowing a lower court's order forcing him to pay $2 billion to stay in effect. In other words, John Roberts, on more than one instance, has not sided with Donald Trump. Amazing. Not to mention the Amy Coney Barrett stuff. But here's Trump's response. On Truth Social, Trump says, it's hard to read, huh? Can we get bigger?

The fake play the ref news in order to create a divide between me and our great Supreme Court heard me say last night loudly and openly as I was walking past the justices on the way to the podium. Thank you to Chief Justice John Roberts. Like most people, I don't watch fake news, CNN or MSN, MSDNC. Sorry, I prefer to call it MSNBS.

But I understand they're going crazy asking what it is that I was thanking Justice Roberts for. They never called my office to ask, of course. But if they had, I would have told these sleazebag journalists that I thanked him for swearing me in on Inauguration Day and doing a really good job in doing so. The fake news never quits. How about this?

What if there was a ruling in which John Roberts ruled in Trump's favor and Trump thanked him? Does that mean quid pro quo? No. Does it mean that Trump is going to offer up a gratuity illegally? No. If it just said, thank you.

I don't care what Trump thanked him for. He didn't admit to any wrongdoing. And there's nothing wrong with thanking somebody, even if it is a judge who ruled in your favor. I'll put it this way. Roberts did ruling Trump's favor on some important things. And he ruled against him on some other things. And Trump said, thank you. Is Trump thanking him for ruling against him on the USAID ruling, which is one of Trump's major agenda items right now? These people are plum nuts. Plum nuts, I say. Law and crime.

Trump made these remarks, president's relevant admissions about the head of Doge immediately come back to haunt administration in court filings. Listen, when you want to talk about the things Trump says that can get him into trouble, this ain't it. He's being sued and, you know, he speaks openly and brazenly. So apparently now, based on the things he said, these words are being used against him.

The media is grasping at straws, and I'm going to tell you exactly what it is. They called it a hot mic moment. It's going to get clicks. That's right.

Hot Mike moment conspiracy theory. I saw the story. I immediately clicked on it. I thought Trump was going to be saying something like, thank you. You know, we're going to do this that or otherwise, and we're going to make sure you're taken care of or who knows. But Trump's not stupid enough to do anything like that. Honestly, I thought it'd be something weird, too, where it was like, yeah, and that lady had backstage men knockers to knock you out. Something like that. Nothing, nothing. Thank you. OK, well, let's talk about where we're currently at.

With the Supreme Court and what Trump actually thinks. Take a look at this image. Amy Coney Barrett gave Trump a look as he walked past. And what's that flat smirk? Then she turns away and then she looks back. I wonder what she was thinking. I think a lot of people are reading too deeply into it to be, you know, to be honest. But here's what Jack Posobiec writes. For Human Events, he says...

When Amy Coney Barrett was confirmed in the Supreme Court in 2020, conservatives cheered. Here was a devout Catholic, a mother of seven, a supposed originalist in the mold of Antonin Scalia, Trump's gift to the right, cemented just days before the election.

Her vote to end Roe v. Wade in 2022's Dobbs decision was a monumental win, no question. Conservatives popped the champagne, toasted the fall of half a century of judicial overreach, and thought we'd secured a reliable warrior for conservative values. But the honeymoon is over, folks. Barrett's track record since then has been a roller coaster of disappointment, with too many stops on the liberal side of the track. This isn't just a critique, it's a red alert for Republicans. Stop playing DEI games with judicial picks or we'll keep getting burned.

He says the lone voice who warned about Amy Coney Barrett in 2019, it was human events. To be fair, Jack, Mike Sertovich also did as well. Take her freshest misstep. March 5th, 25, they ruled that Trump admin can't block two million in USAID funds.

Look at the smoking gun from January 2025. The Supreme Court rejected Trump's bid to delay sentencing in the New York felony case. The 5-4 ruling forced the president-elect to face the music before Inauguration Day. Who sided with the court's three liberal justices? Barrett alongside Chief Justice Roberts. The conservative bloc Thomas Alito Gorsuch dissented, seeing the move for what it was.

Then there's a Jan six cases. We get it. Even on social media, Barrett faltered in Murphy v. Missouri. Don't get me wrong. Ending row was huge. Barrett's vote there delivered a generational shift. OK, I've got this tweet from Tom Saruga. He basically lays it out. It's an interesting commentary. I don't disagree that after Kavanaugh's life was threatened, Amy Coney Barrett just dropped off and said, you can't go up against a deep state. That's the idea. Well, I think she's a woman.

And she probably has a different perspective on many of these issues. And thus, she tends to be a little bit more liberal. Women tend to be way more liberal than men. And so perhaps she is more moved and more agreeable in this regard. I certainly think, however, the big picture is that she is what's the right word? Callow, is that the word? Inexperienced and immature.

She certainly understands the legal system, but she does not understand ramifications of the game being played. And that is the rulings she's making in favor of a corrupt ideology put her in greater danger.

I believe she genuinely does fear the threats against her. But as we know, when you cave to pressure from evil, the evil increases the pressure. That's why U.S. policy overseas is not to negotiate with terrorists. Apparently, they're making an exception for Hamas. Perhaps they view Hamas differently. Trying to avoid a war in Gaza. So fine, I get it. But if an American is kidnapped, U.S. policy is take out the kidnappers. Don't cut them a deal.

And it works. This results in less Americans getting kidnapped abroad because kidnappers are terrified of what special forces will do. And this we know. So I guess my view is this. Donald Trump has nothing to thank the Supreme Court for. They've been wishy washy for the most part. He nominated Amy Coney Barrett. She's not ruled in his favor. Trump made choices that did well for him to a certain degree. Why is he thanking John Roberts?

You know, I made the point on the live show this morning, for all we know, like before he came out to give his speech, he was eating a hot dog and mustard squirt on his tie. And he was like, oh, no, I got mustard on my tie right before my big moment. And John Roberts goes, hold on there. Trump takes his tie off and says, you take this. I'll go find another one. And Trump goes, really? And then as he's leaving, he looks down at that tie and says, thank you. Won't forget it. My point is, I doubt that's what happened, although it'd be hilarious.

Maybe he's got a little bit of wine or something. But for all we know, he's drinking, thanking John Roberts for something so completely innocuous. It's completely immaterial. Maybe it was just for swearing him in. And I think that honestly makes the most sense. When Trump got sworn in, he probably said, thank you for standing next to me. Thank you for doing this. Thank you for not protesting. And here we are. And Trump says, we won't forget it. You won't forget it. I'm not gonna let you down. He's going to do a good job as president.

But if this is the best that Democrats have, OK, fine, whatever. I just say keep it up. Midterms are looking good for us. Stick around, my friends. We got more segments coming up on this channel. Smash the like button. Share the show. Follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast. And we'll see you all in the next show. You know, I haven't said the word civil war in a hot minute, but I was looking at the news. I was looking at the story. I just we put up the segment at three about Democrats obstructing the floor.

We have more obstructions in Congress than we've ever seen. We have more threats of violence than we've ever seen. Elon Musk, as a government employee, is getting death threats and people are shooting up and trying to plant bombs at Tesla facilities. We got a couple of new reports that Tesla charging stations are getting vandalized and several have been intentionally set ablaze. Not to mention that Donald Trump and his run for the presidency was nearly assassinated

And there were a couple other plots that nearly were enacted with one Ukrainian zealot, one American who was a zealot for Ukraine, almost killing Trump, but being spotted by Secret Service. We have this story from The New York Post. Troll arrested for threatening to gut Elon Musk and parade his corpse through the streets. It's from over a week ago. And then we have this story from CBS News. Massachusetts Tesla charging stations intentionally set on fire. Investigators believe from a couple of days ago, it's getting worse.

And, you know, I was thinking about this because we've seen numerous stories of they shot up a Tesla location, shot it up. There was an individual, a trans person who was arrested for trying to plant bombs at a location. You had that individual a year or a couple of years ago posting the location of Elon's private jet. We are we are beyond civil strife. Now, we can say we're in some kind of civil war, but I think it's always the, you know, the forest and the trees, as they say.

I'd like to go back to the American Civil War the first time with Bleeding Kansas. Periods of civil strife are the precursor to civil war. And that is when there is widespread violence, vandalism for political reasons. We had a Rudyard Lynch from What If Alt History on Tim Kast IRL. He predicted 1,000 would be dead by April. It's only three weeks away. I don't think it's going to happen. That being said...

We are seeing a dramatic escalation in threats of violence, death threats and extreme vandalism. And this means it's crazy stuff.

There have been numerous reports that Tesla vehicle owners have had their cars vandalized. They've parked their cars in certain areas and they come out and people have keyed it up, spray painted it, saying F Elon and things like this. Others have been putting stickers or magnets on their car saying I bought it before Elon went crazy. It's because these people live in a terroristic hell zone.

When you are surrounded in an urban environment by terrorists threatening you, you have to put up signs saying, please don't hurt me. They do it in Oakland, California. They don't do it in West Virginia because we all have guns. And anybody who tries to commit acts of terror, well, people here defend themselves. But the news is pretty crazy. Take a look at this. Massachusetts Tesla charging stations intentionally set on fire from CBS News.

They say at this point, it does appear that it was a set fire. It happened around Monday at 1 a.m. The Point Shopping Center on Constitution Avenue, Littleton. The charging stations are locally located close to several businesses, including the tavern in the square restaurant and a market basket grocery store store. What we are seeing now is acts of terrorism. I think any sane person can recognize this mass vandalism against electric vehicles,

I thought these people were concerned about climate change. No, they're cult members. And Elon Musk doesn't matter if he's saving the environment. They're cult members. He's not. The Littleton Police Department said the charging stations were engulfed in flames with heavy and heavy dark smoke when they arrived. Power was eventually shut. Power was eventually shut down in the area. But while crews were waiting for electric department to arrive, another charging station caught fire.

The electricity is one of our bigger issues that we're dealing with and making sure that not only the public, but the firefighters are safe. Littleton Police and Fire Departments in Massachusetts State Fire and Explosive Investigation Unit attached to the state fire marshal's office are investigating and have determined that the fire appears to be intentionally set. This is crazy. Look at this. Destroying charging locations. Tesla products have been the targets of vandalism in recent weeks in several states. Tesla CEO Elon Musk endorsed Trump. We get it.

It's not going to make any difference to Elon Musk. You're only harming society. You're only harming the people who actually use these charging stations, said Tesla driver Zaheer Calvert. Someone could have got hurt, right? Someone could have got burned. Someone could have died. That's what is the real problem.

A Massachusetts man told WBZ-TV he had been threatened because he drives a gold Cybertruck made by Tesla. Someone put a profane sticker on his vehicle. And when he posted a photo of it on social media, the man told the police started getting death threats online.

Over the weekend in Maryland, graffiti was found at a Tesla dealership. The day after nearly 300 protesters gathered outside the business to protest Musk and his push to slash government spending. Police said the graffiti, graffiti said no Musk with a sign that resembles a swastika.

In northern Colorado last month, police arrested a suspect who had been wanted for allegedly placing incendiary devices at a Tesla dealership. That investigation began in January when the dealership was vandalized and devices were found on the scene. It's only getting worse. This story from Vernon Morningstar. Someone deliberately ruined Tesla charging station in Osoyoos. Osoyoos? Is that how you pronounce it?

They put spray foam in the Tesla chargers so that nobody could use them. We know what this is about. Democrats are increasingly embracing violence. And don't take it from me. Adam Conover was on a podcast. I'm assuming it's his where he spoke with this woman who said this. A lot of women who had basically knitted these. They did the same pussy design.

in red white and blue and they're like we're t this is american resistance is american i was like you know what ladies i love it right so that was great to see but what i also asked these people and these are again these are like you know your middle age you know engaged people most of them and i'm highly educated and i asked them you know this question that we adapted from a national survey and the question was um

you know to what degree do you agree or disagree with this statement um that political violence may be necessary to protect democracy and a third of the people at the people's march

said they agreed or strongly agreed with that statement, which is a huge shift from what we have seen. Back during the American Values Survey, the last time they fielded, it was only 8% of Democrats. And let me just say, at the People's March, it was 93% of the people in the crowds voted for Kamala Harris. So these are Democrats. And they are starting to shift their opinion. So that's the thing I'm worried about. But I'm not saying we have enough people in the streets right now. I'm saying there are enough people who are starting to feel threatened that they're going to push back.

A lot of women who have basically knitted the they feel threatened. A third of the people at the People's March said they agreed that they should use violence to, quote unquote, protect democracy. And they're supporting all of this. Do you think any one of these people are going to shed a tear if something bad happens to Elon Musk? Of course they won't. Or Donald Trump?

These people were going online and celebrating Luigi Mangione, the suspect in the UnitedHealthcare CEO assassination. They're going online and advocating for assassination. One woman said that she wanted bad things. I'm keeping a very light, but she threatened the life of Elon Musk and she may get a visit from the federal investigators. They're not going to stop.

And I get it. I do. They're a cult. Their ideas are bad and they are losing. We are rational moderates. Some lean left, some lean right. Some are much more staunch conservative. Some are actually a little bit liberal, like R.F.K. Jr. or Tulsi Gabbard. So we have a coalition of reason and differing views, and they have a cult that is losing.

But I get it. Their worldview is being destroyed because it's busted and there's nothing left for them. Their arguments have failed. So what happens when your words don't work? They now begin to advocate for violence, physical attacks, physical disruptions, and they're doing it. Burning down Tesla stations, trying to plant bombs at dealerships, shooting up Tesla dealerships. These are just car dealerships. And as we read,

One man saying he received threats for simply driving a cyber truck. This is going to get worse. And this is the concern that we had. So maybe Rudyard was a little bit too far on one end in his prediction for a thousand deaths. I think there's like 40 or 50 politically motivated deaths in the past four months, which is kind of crazy. But that is kind of a stretch. Directly motivated political killings in the streets are like maybe 20, which is still kind of crazy, right? Nowhere near a thousand. But I wonder,

How will Donald Trump and the federal government get a handle on this? You've got that breaking news at the top of this article. It says Trump is expected to sign an executive order abolishing the Department of Education. These people are nuts. They're going to keep escalating and the violence will get worse. So where does it leave us, man? I hope you all are prepared.

You know, I've been warning about some kind of civil war for a while. You have Ray Dalio. You have many other prominent individuals warning that right now we're in some kind of civil war. I think the issue is that we are in civil strife. But many people see these as the same thing in that it's the early stages of a civil war. Not all civil strife becomes war. The civil rights movement was civil strife. No civil war. Bleeding Kansas was civil strife. And then we got civil war.

So I'm curious to see what happens because Trump ain't stopping here. He's going to gut the DOE. He's going to gut the Federal Reserve. He's going to fire people from the VA, from the IRS. He is gutting the bureaucrat, the bureaucratic state. These people aren't sitting by. They're angry for no legitimate reason. Makes no sense. But I do think a lot of these people that are engaging in violence don't care about Doge, don't care about Elon, don't care about Trump.

No matter what the U.S. government does is bad, and they're exploiting the insanity among Democrats for their justification. Democrats recently obstructed a congressional proceeding, singing songs, refusing to come to order. And did Mike Johnson do anything? He recessed. Did he call the sergeant at arms of the police to remove the protesters? Nope. Why not? Well, there's no balls. And because of this, Democrats will keep escalating. We'll see.

I'm going to wrap it up there. Tune into Timcast IRL tonight. Thanks for hanging out. We'll see you all then.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is facing potential criminal charges over aiding and abetting of illegal immigration. Now, I'm a little bit torn on this one. The argument is that AOC was simply informing Americans in general of their rights as it pertains to law enforcement. I don't disagree with that. However, there is a law on the books. I believe it's 18 U.S.C. 1324. I will pull it up. I did it pulled up.

It says you cannot encourage or induce illegal immigration, in which case.

Even if you are speaking about rights, depending on how you go about this, encouraging illegal immigrants to come or reside here, it's actually a crime. Now, that's interesting because we do have a First Amendment that says there shall be no law respecting, you know, speech, etc. A little bit more complicated than that. But still, nonetheless, Congress codified this law and there are questions about how we deal with it, in which case, so long as it's on the books, AOC can be charged for encouragement of

Probably not inducement, which we'll get into. And then she would have to challenge it to the Supreme Court, which she may in fact win.

The issue at hand is, is she simply informing people of their rights or is she offering up strategies to bypass law enforcement, essentially aiding and abetting a criminal? We can make the argument a couple different ways. It's one thing to generally say to the public, look, no matter what you've done, be it you're innocent walking down the street or you rob the bank. If a cop stops you without cause, probable cause or due process or anything like that, well, not due process, but probable cause, you don't have to stop.

You don't got to show them ID unless you're suspected of a crime, in which case the police can detain you, check your ID and potentially hold you. However, if somebody robs a bank and you then say,

To the people who robbed the banks, here's what you need to understand about bypassing law enforcement so you can get away with having robbed the bank. Now we're talking about something else. That's not simply informing someone of their rights, but we don't need analogies. We can literally just go to the issue of illegal immigration. AOC had a webinar hosted. She did not actually attend where they were providing information specifically to illegal immigrants on how to bypass law enforcement.

The question then comes to intent. One could simply argue to a court. No, no. It was a general. Here's what you hear. Your rights as it pertains to ice. The problem. This is what judges are for. You know, I'll give you a quick example. But first, let me say this.

AOC has written a letter to the DOJ, and we now have, after this congressional hearing, what appears to be potentially illegal statements made by the mayor of Boston who told illegal immigrants, this is your home, effectively saying, that's actually a crime. I'm not saying I completely agree with it because I don't know how I feel about this. It's speech, but...

An official, be it in Congress or the government, telling illegal immigrants they can stay is beyond encouragement. It will be perceived as a statement of authority. That could be inducement, in which case I actually consider it to be a very serious crime.

I don't know that anyone's actually going to go after AOC. We shall see. But of course, the left is freaking out. And, you know, I did say I had an example, but I want to just read the news because otherwise I'm going to rant as I do sometimes. Smash the like button. Share the show with everyone, you know, and comment below. Guys, I got a general understanding what everyone's going to say. But considering there is a question of speech, right? Should individuals be allowed to speak?

that you can stay here, that you should be able to live here. Should that be criminal in regards to encouragement and inducement of illegal immigration? Now, to clarify, inducement is actually if you said something like, I'll give you this money to come and stay here. And then, of course, you have sanctuary city policies, in which case you have inducement. So AOC, I think, look, I'll tell you what I think.

I think Mayor Wolf Boston and AOC should get criminally charged and they should get a fine of like 200 bucks or something and a slap on the wrist. Right. It's like, hey, don't do this. It is illegal. You can't do it. Considering it's a question of speech, however, I throw it on to you to comment and let me know what you think. And also, don't forget to share the show, share the video. Rick Scott was speaking on Betty Johnson's show and he actually said AOC should be charged.

Let's take a look. Let's take a look at what's currently going on. We got this from Slate.com. AOC writes to DOJ to find out if she's actually under investigation.

Now hold on there a minute. To migrants. Let me go back to that point I was going to make before. There was a story, the example that I wanted to give. We'll throw it out there because it's basically come up right away.

I've told this story before. I asked a human rights lawyer about New York's human rights law, which states that gender is protected. And I said gender is defined in New York City law, New York City law under the Human Rights Code of New York as self-expression.

And it says the clothing you wear, the name you use. And I said, what if someone dressed up in a giant rabbit costume and whatever? And or the example you all know is what if a guy got hired by Starbucks, normal clothes and everything? And then day one, he shows up in a wolf fursuit and he says his name is a vociferon, Herald of the Winter Mists. And that is his name. His

His name must be used. And everything I described, it is within the confines of New York human rights law. The name you request must be used. Your clothing must be respected. You cannot be made to dress in ways that are perceived as normal. And I spoke with three different human rights lawyers. They all said the same thing. You would be laughed out of court, to which my response was, but why? The law says you can't do this. How could a judge? And they said, that's what judges are for. Judges interpret the law.

My response, of course, was so if a six foot five super ripped guy, hairy in a beard, wore a dress and screamed he was Susan, a judge could laugh at his face and throw him out.

And they all said no, because they understand the intent of the law. And I said, seems hypocritical, seems illogical. But that's the reality. We know what the intent of the law was and that judges are going to say the purpose of this law is to protect transgender individuals, not furries. I said, OK, so the judge can choose when they laugh. It's not about codified law. It's about what the intent is.

Largely, yes. Largely, yes. And then over time, it becomes textualized, meaning another example would be in New York. They banned public drinking. And one of the famous quotes from a city councilman said, let it be said, this will never be misconstrued to prevent a man from having a beer with his lunch while at work. And certainly that's what it is. So, yeah, it becomes textualized. My point here is that when AOC they have a we had a webinar on their legal rights and

The question is, will a federal judge be like, oh, well, you know, can't do anything about it because it was about. No. Is he going to then say, I know what your intent was. You intended to encourage and induce illegal immigration. I don't care what you call it. I don't care how you structured it. That's a crime. In which case, right to jail. Right to jail.

Now, this is interesting that AOC has written this letter. I do have the letter pulled up for you, which I want to read. But the development on the story, because it was a couple days ago, is that the mayor of Boston is effectively doing something similar when speaking before Congress and saying to the illegal immigrants, this is your home. It's not. And that is illegal. Again, I'll pull up a lot of second. But here we go. AOC wrote this on the 27th.

To the Honorable Pam Bondi, I write to request clarity on whether the DOJ has yielded to political pressure in attempts to weaponize the agency against elected officials whose speech they disagree with. Over the past two weeks, Border Sar Tom Homan has gone on multiple forms threatening political prosecution against me, citing resources I distributed informing my constituents and the American people of their constitutional and legal rights. I'm going to pause and just say, my friends, the reason AOC wrote this letter is not because she needed clarity. This is a PR preempt.

In the event she gets criminally charged for what is overt criminal actions, she wants to make sure she gets a statement out before. We call this information vaccination, right? Ian on IRL brought it up that when fake news emerges, whatever story people see first, they'll put more weight towards. So if someone says Trump calls Nazis very fine people and the corporate press reports that a default liberal, whatever random person is going to see them go, whoa.

But if you give them the information where Trump says, and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis, the white nationalists, if you show them that video first, when the story comes out, they go, huh? But I saw the video. Trump didn't say that. He condemned them. In this regard, it's very similar. AOC wrote this letter not for clarity. She wrote it so that in the event she gets criminally charged, she will then say, see, I told you I said they were going to politicize this when in reality, they're not.

It's not politicized. She overtly broke the law and is trying to dance around this. We cannot tolerate this. Most people in this country are sick of illegal immigration, and you've got Democrats championing it and breaking the law. Don't take my word for it. Let's pull up the law. Where do we have this silly thing? Did I have it pulled up over here? It's oh, I'm sorry. I didn't have it. Eighteen USC one, three, two, four, one, three, two, four.

I actually remembered the code on this one because it comes up so often. I'm sorry, it's not 18, it's eight. I was wrong. It's eight US code 1324, bringing in and harboring certain... I thought I had this pulled up. I guess I didn't. Okay, take a look. I bet I do have it pulled up somewhere. Anyway.

That means everyone in her webinar.

would be culpable in this regard or face criminal liability. Now, I don't know that Trump wants to play a heavy hand like that, so I'm not convinced it'll actually happen. But I think it is fair to say that AOC outright broke the law. And what should be done is she gets a fine. They say,

Pam Bondi should be like, yes, AOC, you did break the law and we're issuing a $200 fine. Don't do it again. And then you know what? Then she's on notice and they'll say it's weaponization. And then Pam Bondi can respond. We wrote her a citation saying,

What is she crying about? The law says don't encourage or induce illegal immigration. She did. She can go to court and challenge her hundred dollar, two hundred dollar ticket, which she probably will make a big spectacle about it. And then we get answers and let's go to prison for this or anything like that. But we have to have enforcement and there has to be precedent saying you can't do this. Otherwise, they'll keep doing it. And they are.

She says, Mr. Homan announced he had asked the deputy attorney general to open an investigation and that I will be in trouble now. It has been 14 days since Mr. Homan first threatened to weaponize your agency, but I have not yet heard any referral from the federal government. Homan's actions undercut core constitutional rights and further transparency is necessary. I am sure you're aware of the First Amendment of the Constitution. Get it? Indeed, last week, Vice President Vance said that many may disagree with your views, but we will fight to defend your right to offer it in a public square.

Indeed, AOC, we are not talking about your views. We are talking about inducement and encouragement of criminal action, which is a crime. To put it simply, if AOC's intent was simply you don't have to talk to cops, we'd say, well, you know, that's that's fine. But we know what her intent was, and that's what judges are for. We don't just go, oh, rats, she tricked us. I love I love that people think this is a reality in law. Let's try another one.

So in Chicago, when I was growing up, we had keggers. You guys know what a kegger is, right? Yeah, it's a party with a keg. And they'd be like, who got the keg? And they did this really funny thing that I absolutely love because they're stupid as a box of rocks. But hey, you know, the beer was free. That's right. However, the red cup was $5. We're not selling booze. We're selling red cups.

Do you think that works? It's the funniest thing I've ever heard because there were several instances. People would rent a warehouse for a weekend and the warehouses knew it was going on with these parties and they'd buy two or three kegs. They'd get a stacks of cups and then they'd say, you're free to take the booze, whatever. But the cups cost five dollars. And so everybody knew what the game was. It's five bucks if you want access to the keg. It's unlimited booze for everybody. Like you fill up as much as you want.

Yo, it's solicitation. All right. That's what they call it. And there were people who got charged and were shocked to find. But I was selling red cups, not beer. And they're going to be like, you think we're stupid? So AOC is playing stupid games. OK, and now Rick Scott, he appeared a few days ago on Benny Johnson's show and it said she seems like she's violating the law. Indeed, she is. Now, let's throw it to our good friends over on Reddit. I love how stupid people are.

Ladies and gentlemen, I ain't going to pretend to be the smartest guy in the room nor the world. There are a lot of things I don't know, and sometimes there are things I don't quite understand. But I am a guy who at least reads a little bit. And I can tell you this. 20 days ago.

Will Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez get charged by the DOJ? I don't think she will get charged by telling them the constitutional right, but will she still get charged with obstruction of justice? For example, if a police officer is trying to arrest a suspect and someone purposely interfering with it might be charged with obstruction of justice. I think this could apply to ice raid. No, let me just pause very quickly for this individual on this subreddit who got downvoted. Um,

It's encouragement inducement. It's eight USC one, three, two, four subsection section a subsection four. That is it's not about obstruction of justice. It's about her encouraging illegal immigration. You could also argue that's aiding and abetting the encouragement or inducement, which means her staff as well. Now, get this. When her staff hosted the webinar, she was supposed to be there. She didn't show up. You know why? She knows it's illegal. I love I love, love, love these people who think they know the law.

Lap steel guitar with a top comment. Dumb as a box of rocks. AOC has congressional immunity. It's in the Constitution. She cannot be prosecuted for anything while doing her official job. Congress would first have to waive her immunity. Not likely. While AOC is not a lawyer, advising people of their rights is not against the law. Also, she is not suggesting that people do anything illegal. I don't see any basis for anything other than blather from the DOJ on this topic. Someone responded, she is not suggesting. Just a heads up for your typo. I'm sure most understand your meaning.

Ha ha. And they added it to be clear. She would have to personally waive her immunity. It cannot be waived by anybody without her consent. Heavens me.

AOC is immune from all crimes. What? That's crazy. When you're in Congress, you can't go to jail. News to me, because we've had tons of members of Congress get criminally charged. And in fact, they're referring to likely the speech and debate clause, which is in the Constitution. Is it? I believe my understanding is. And how about we read it?

The senators and representatives shall receive a compensation for their services to be entertained by law and paid out of the Treasury of the United States. They shall in cases in all cases except treason, felony and breach of the peace be privileged from arrest. Really? Wait, there's more. During their attendance at the session of their respective houses and in going to and returning from the same and for any speech or debate in either house, they shall not be questioned at any other place.

The speech and debate debate clause pertains only to when they are in session. AOC can't go out randomly and commit crimes and get away with it. If she committed inducement or encouragement, so be it.

So Constitutional.Congress.gov says the Supreme Court has described the speech and debate clause as a provision that cannot be interpreted literally, but instead must be construed broadly in order to effectuate the clause's vital role in the constitutional separation of powers. Deceptively simple phrases such as shall not be questioned, speech and debate, or even senators and representatives have therefore been accorded meanings that extend well beyond their literal constructions. Arguably, this purpose driven interpretive approach has given rise to ambiguity and blah, blah, blah.

Despite uncertainty at the margins, it is well established that the clause serves to secure the independence of the federal legislature by providing members of Congress and their aides with immunity from criminal prosecutions or civil suits that stem from acts taken within the legislative sphere. How did they not read this legal advice? What is that? What subreddit is this?

legal advice off topic. The Internet is full of experts, and I am certainly not one of them. All I can tell you is here's Congress.gov saying in the confines of their work. So AOC may go to jail. But there is more. And I know it's I can't believe it's 17 minutes already. Boston Mayor Michelle Wu defends sanctuary city policies before Congress. Here you go, ladies and gentlemen. You can hear it right here. You belong here. This is your home. Boston is your home.

Boston, this is our city. We are the safest major city in the nation because we are safe for everyone. You belong here. You belong here. This is your home. This is your home. This is a hearing where they were asked specifically about sanctuary city policies. OK, so actually I did have the law pulled up. It's right there.

8 U.S.C. 1324 for an official from Boston. Let's play your game. Legal advice off topic. She has no speech and debate clause immunities. She in her official capacity as mayor is telling illegal immigrants this is your home. She is encouraging them to reside here explicitly. Can I just let's just hammer this one out. Let me read it.

Any person who encourages or induces an alien to come to enter or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact, blah, blah, encouraging or inducing them to reside here, telling an illegal immigrant, this is your home.

There is quite literally nothing more on the nose than that reside here. It's one thing if you said I have a residence in Boston. It's another thing if you said my home is in Boston. You understand the difference? Now we can argue semantics all day and night, but generally we get it. There are people who have a residency or a residence in Boston, but their home is in New York. Lots of people. In fact, they have summer homes, a residence, but not their home.

When you say, you know, you know, I'll say this. There's a there is this. When I was a little kid, we had something on the wall. It said a house is made of brick and stone. A home is made of love alone. That's right. So when she says this is your home, she is quite literally on the nose. Nothing could be more in line with the law.

encouraging people to reside in the United States illegally. That's a crime. For this, I believe these people should be criminally charged, AOC included. Now, once again, this letter from AOC is meant to preempt any charges that may come her way. For one, it's

She's trying to drum up a news story so that liberals can be like, go AOC. But she's doing this to make sure she frames the narrative around what's happening before it actually happens. And I don't think she'll be criminally charged. I really don't. But this is basically her information vaccination. She said.

Are you going to weaponize the DOJ against my speech and my First Amendment rights? That's why she wrote the letter. So the narrative now exists that AOC is under threat of her rights being curtailed and political weaponization. If the DOJ now tries to actually go after her for her criminal actions, which are I believe they are literally criminal, then she's going to say, told you so. And everyone's going to go, whoa, she was right. You see, that's how people think.

She goes on to say educating the public about their rights, especially in a time of rising uncertainty, is a key part of our responsibilities like that. Officials, a government that uses threats of DOJ investigations to suppress free speech is a threat to all. OK, sure. Whatever. Don't care. She should be charged. Mayor Wu should be charged. And any any any one of them. I mean, we got this video. I think I have the video right here. No, not that one. Which one is it? Here we go.

Virginia Fox forced every last mayor at the hearing to admit how much they spent on illegal aliens over the last four years. If you are a city and you are providing illegal immigrant services, I believe you violated the law already. That's inducement. If you come here, we'll give you this thing. California offers up free health care to illegal immigrants. No joke. Free health care. It's called Medi-Cal.

I believe the DOJ should start locking these people up who are, look, I'll put it this way. If you're a healthcare provider in California, here's what I propose the DOJ do.

An illegal immigrant can come in or they can do a sting operation and have a guy go to a health care provider and say, I'm not I'm I'm undocumented. I just I just got here and I need I need a medical check. I'm in a lot of pain. And as soon as the receptionist says yes, the cops walk in, pick her up, cuff her and say you're under arrest for inducement for illegal immigration. And she'll be shocked and say, but but but what do you mean it's the law? And they'll be like, you broke the law. You broke the law. You go to jail.

and then give her a slap on the wrist. I don't think some random receptionist should go to prison, but they can cover and they can do that to say to all of the medical providers, I don't care what your government says. If you aid, abet, induce or encourage illegal immigration, it's a crime. Same for AOC and Mayor Wu. I'm going to wrap it up there, my friends. We got a bunch of big news coming up. It's going to get crazy today. Smash the like button, share the show with everyone you know.

What did I say? Smash the like button and share the show. You can follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast. Thanks for hanging out. CastBrewCoffee.com and we'll see you on the next segment.