EPSTEIN VIDEO To Be RELEASED By FBI, People Claim Bongino IS LYING, Will Post AI Deepfake
01:06:39 Share

Speaking this morning on Fox and Friends, FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino has announced not only do they have footage of Epstein's jail, they will be releasing it to show you, in fact, that Epstein did take his own life.

Dan Bongino said that there is clear footage of this, but, you know, it's they're going to enhance it. And then they're going to they're going to release the original. So, you know, that there's no messing around here and an enhanced version. So you can make out, I guess, images of Epstein ending his own life, because I got to be honest, what else could he show? He's claiming in this interview that there was no one else there.

And that's the video they have. But instantly and immediately, my friends, I'm sorry, the world of truth is over. Everyone's already screaming AI. Why? Well, we were told the cameras went out. The cameras weren't working. The footage got erased. So there's no footage. Now, that's not entirely true. Actually, it's just certain videos got damaged and erased. And there is reporting going back to 2019 showing that there were some cameras. But the question then is, I thought, as well as most people,

The cameras that were pointed at the Epstein cell went down. So we can't actually see what happened in his jail cell. Sure, there are cameras from other parts of the jail, but that was immaterial. So what footage do they have? I suppose right now it seems he's saying we're going to release footage showing nobody came in or out. Because of this, people are saying BS. You're going to put out AI generated video. And oh boy, my friends, y'all.

I think most of you have a general idea of where we're currently at in the AI video reality. And I'm proud to say I was wrong when I went on Joe Rogan's show several years ago. This is what, four years ago. I was completely wrong. He asked me if I was worried about AI video and deep face. I was like, no, I don't think so. And check this out. This is just some stupid video I made. Humanity is over. AI creatures will control you.

And you want me, you want it. They even got the tongue smack. Listen to this. You want me, you want it. And you want me, you want it. That's crazy. Absolutely insane where we're currently headed. So if they wanted to push a narrative, they'd make an AI video. Now, I'm not saying that's what Dan Bongino is going to do. I'm saying that's what other people are pointing out. What I'd like to stress, my friends, the technology that we have access to with Google's VO3, that's what it's called, V-E-O-3,

You say VO and people think it's VO. It's VEO. The videos that are coming out are already insane. Now, to be fair, they're still obviously AI to a certain degree. Many of them, the more ridiculous they are, it looks like AI. Some of them look very real. If you were to make, if I were to go in, actually, let me try and do this right now. Maybe I can do this in real time. Let's see what happens. And it takes a few minutes to render. So I am going to make a video. And let's see here.

Let's do this. While we read the story, and I play the clip for you, I'm typing this in right now. Security. Here we go. Security camera footage of a jail hallway with a cell at the end. Grainy surveillance camera. Let's see what it makes.

Let's see what it makes. And this is just me using Google. The point is the technology the government has is probably light years ahead of us. So when a regular person can make a video like the one I made, and there's crazier ones. What do you think Google can make? They've got access to the alpha versions of this stuff. What they're releasing to you is what works. They've probably got much, much bigger systems that are still in testing. I bet Google can render a full movie right now.

It might be a little weird looking, but they're getting there. And the reason is they've got access. It says we can't do that. Come on, let's try again.

I don't think it'll work, to be honest. I think the training data that Gemini has is largely YouTube and movies, so it's not going to get security camera footage right. Here's a story from MediaEye, and then I'll show you the comments. FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino promised the release of new video from the cell bay housing human trafficker Jeffrey Epstein around the time of his suicide to prove no one was there but him. Wow. Gemini is just outright saying, like, we're overloaded. I can't do it. Come on.

They're going to mention that Epstein's, there we go, we got to go. But Gino's comments come after he and FBI Director Kash Patel came under fire from the MAGA crowd for having dismissed conspiracy theories about Epstein during a joint interview earlier this month on Fox News. Now, I can't believe I'm doing this, but I want to show you this clip from the Daily Show. And I think they actually make a good point. I do. I'm going to play this clip for you.

Before he took over, Dan Bongino wasn't afraid to tell us the truth about what the FBI was covering up. Nobody knows how much material people have on Jeffrey Epstein. It's unbelievable. The guy killed himself, and now nobody's gonna know.

Yeah, exactly. Epstein killed himself? Bungino knows the truth. And now he and Kash Patel get to see all the files. So on Sunday, they sat down for an interview to tell us what really happened. Because we know Epstein didn't just kill himself. He killed himself. What? He... he killed himself without air quotes?

That is the craziest thing I've ever heard, all right? I was a single-issue voter on this. Why did you change your mind? As a public defender, as a prosecutor who's been in that prison system, who's been in the Metropolitan Detention Center, who's been in segregated housing, um, you know a suicide when you see one, and that's what that was. Again, you want me to... I've-I've seen the whole file. He killed himself.

I've never seen someone so sad that the deep state didn't kill someone. That's pretty good, to be honest. And also, hey, you can't talk so much shit about how the deep state did this and make it your entire personality, and then now you're in it, and you're, like, just shrugging it off, like, oh, yeah, I guess they were right the first time they investigated this. Hey, if you fail that hard, you gotta let him... So, uh, he then goes in and makes fun of Sean Duffy about moving a painting at the Academy, which is a waste of everybody's time. Very stupid. But...

But he does make an interesting point. Dan Bongino had been saying for a while that, you know, Epstein, it's like air quotes. And now he's saying, no, I saw it. I think the reality is, why are you making fun? Like, I'll put it this way. If it is true, and I'm not saying I know for sure. I still lean towards I don't believe it. But if it is true, you're mad at a guy for admitting he was wrong going in there. You know, I got to be honest. I went in there and I checked it out. And yeah, it looks like a suicide.

We have this video. This is ALX. FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino says video exists. It seems to show Epstein killed himself and will be released publicly. Let me play the clip for you. We did play a little bit in the beginning. Those two cases obviously are of significant public interest. I'm just telling you what we see in the file. I just want to be crystal clear on this.

I am not asking anyone to believe me. I'm telling you what's there and what isn't right. There is nothing in the file at this point on the Epstein case, and there's going to be a disclosure on this coming shortly. We are working through some. There is video.

That is something the public does not know. There's video of him killing himself. No, no, not the actual act. But the entire MCC Bay, it was only one camera. There's video that when you look at the video, and we will release, that's what's taken a while on this. We are working on cleaning it up to make sure you have an enhanced. And we're going to give the original so you don't think there were any shenanigans. You're going to see there's no one there but him. Right.

There's just nobody there. So I say to people all the time, if you have a tip, let us know. But there's no DNA. There's no audio. There's no fingerprints. There's no suspects. There's no accomplices. There's no tips. There is nothing. If you have it, I'm happy to see it. There's video clear as day. He's the only person in there and the only person coming out. You can see it. So I just want to point out.

There are other ways to get into buildings. And I just want to stress this. If somebody did want to end such a high profile evil man with blackmail on a bunch of high profile evil men, I don't think they'd walk in the front door. So I, you know, look, the response from a lot of people right now is it's going to be a look at this. Evan Kilgore and X says.

Why would they tell us the cameras were down? Camera were down. I don't believe anything. This is all getting very strange. Sound like it's going to be AI. And Alex points out from 2019 Washington Post, at least one camera in the hallway outside the cell where authorities say Epstein hanged himself had footage that is unusable, although other clearer footage was captured in the area. According to three people briefed on the evidence gathered earlier that month. Oh, this is from Jesus. I knew Cash and Dan weren't BSing us.

Here's one. Wendy Evans. Well, isn't this rich? Bongino has sold his soul. The cameras are not working. It's a fact. So with non-working cameras, how is it possible to make such a determination? He says Epstein was alone before and after with no proof of any suspects. Again, cameras are not working. Oh, here we go. Here's a great one. Dan Bongino is not above releasing AI slop deepfake videos for the benefit of Israel. You can't trust a single thing that comes out of his mouth or his office, especially about Epstein. I don't.

This is the world we live in, man. So I tried to make it a video and I'll try again. But I don't know. Can I make this bigger? Easier to see. Here's the video. There's there's not even any sound. This didn't work. I said security camera footage of a jail hallway with a cell at the end. Grainy surveillance camera. And it made a movie. It made a cinematic video of someone walking down a hallway with a bunch of doors. It's a cool video.

Uh, it'd be great if I was making a movie, but I want a camera from the top of the room pointed down. It doesn't understand that. Why? It's training data is all based on YouTube videos and movies. And it is a surveillance footage is a minuscule amount of that training data relative to all the videos that are produced by humans for entertainment purposes. But I'd say this, um, I lean towards, uh, Dan's right. I lean towards, uh, cash and Dan are telling the truth.

When this whole story broke, I said, look, there is a possibility he did kill himself. It just doesn't seem probable. Right? So this is why I always say, people say, Tim, you're a milquetoast fester. No, it's because if I don't know, I don't know. And so my personal belief is more likely he did not kill himself. However, there's a good probability that he did. He crawled on top of the bed. His legs were folded underneath him and he tied the sheet around his neck and then grabbed the bed and lunged forward. That's what they claim he did.

Yeah, maybe. It seems crazy. The whole thing, see, the guards fell asleep, a camera broke. But that being said, maybe. I honestly don't know. I don't think Dan's lying. The issue, however, is if there was information that Epstein did not do it, would Dan and Cash really tell us? See, I don't live in the world of comic book villainy. I don't believe that the people who are, don't get me wrong, comic book villains exist, but

But I believe there are a lot of people that have classified information. They don't tell you and they lie to you, not because they're evil and they hate you, but because of the ramifications. So while certainly I believe there are many uniparty shills, largely Democrats, but some Republicans who are deviant and evil people, I think there are some people in intelligence, like we may be seeing now with Dan, going, if we release this information, it will destroy the country. And it's a utilitarian, it's a trolley problem. It really comes down to it.

Release the tapes, destroy the country, or lie, and the country keeps on keeping on. I think that is a conundrum faced by many people in power. You know, honestly, by every person in power. And sometimes it's not the right decision, but leaders aren't always the best of people. One of my favorite shows, if not my favorite show, is Star Trek The Next Generation. The Klingon Empire. Trekkies out there know what I'm talking about.

Turns out that a high-ranking dude, his dad was dishonorable and a murderer, and they're like, we can't let anyone know. Worf, your dad has to take the blame for this. Otherwise, it could destabilize the empire. For the betterment of the empire, it's better people don't know the truth. I don't know how I feel about that. To be Rorschach or to be Dr. Manhattan in Watchmen, graphic novel,

There's a... The comic book written, I think it's the 80s, right? The story is that the bad guy stages an alien invasion to force the U.S. and the Soviet Union to unify, preventing nuclear annihilation. He stages an alien invasion, so it's like, oh no, now we have to fight the aliens together. Rorschach, one of the characters, says, nope, I'm going to tell everybody the truth. So Dr. Manhattan says, if you do this, you'll condemn the world to nuclear annihilation. He says, so what? Never compromise, not even in the face of Armageddon. And so then...

Dr. Manhattan blows him up. Superhero stuff. The reason I bring this up is not to be like, wow, superheroes, I hope you're more reasoned than that. It's to bring up that writers, people who have envisioned these scenarios, they create these works of fiction to tell these stories and present these scenarios. Deep Space Nine. Cisco stages a false flag assassinating a senator to force enemies of the Federation into a war against the Dominion.

It's wild stuff. And I think these things are important because people don't want to believe it's real. They read in a book or they hear someone claim a false flag or the government lying. They don't believe it. You watch these shows and they humanize it. They have the commander explain exactly why he staged an assassination, killed a guy, because if he did not, without support of the Romulans in the war, Earth would lose. So throw out the sci-fi stuff for those that think it's cringe and whatever. And the point is this.

Dan Bongino, Cash, or anybody else will be in government and they will say, I will not see this country fall. And then they're asked, will you lie to the world in order to save the country? And they say, yes. I wish there were easier answers for you. But who knows? To be honest, I have no idea. Maybe Epstein did it. Maybe he didn't. Maybe Dan's telling the truth. Maybe he's not. I lean towards, I got to be honest, I trust Cash and Dan. And I think more so people want to believe what they want to believe.

For instance, that one tweet that said the cameras were down, it was one camera that was down. And so there's no footage of the actual cell. But Dan's saying the cameras they have, the footage that shows, nobody entered or exited. It's not definitive proof. Maybe it's AI edited. I don't know. Will we ever really know? I'm going to wrap it up there. Smash the like button. Share the show with everyone you know. Follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast. Thanks for hanging out. We'll see you all in the next segment.

Fresh embarrassment, they call it. Yeah, MSNBC's ratings are so apocalyptically bad. I don't actually know how these networks survive the next five or so years. Now, of course, we talk about this quite a bit because it seems not a week goes by we don't see the collapsing ratings of the narrative machine. Now, this is true for Fox News as well, but Fox News is still hitting several hundred thousand in the key demo.

I'm going to say this first and foremost, my friends. I don't rightly care right now about the 70 plus demographic. I just don't.

They largely watch cable TV news to the millions. They're not really watching shows like this. I'm not saying I have no respect for the older generation. I'm saying I don't care to pander to 70 plus year olds who live in a world of cable TV news. And that's all they're watching. And I don't think that it's relevant to the shape of this country, nor do I think anybody who is working politically should be factoring that in to their future plans.

That is to say, MSNBC is not able to muster up any kind of legitimacy right now. The best they can do is 700,000 70-year-olds. The one age group that hates Donald Trump. Now, Fox News seems to be doing somewhat all right. Their clips on YouTube do fairly well. And Jesse Waters gets about half a million. Well, I think the latest ratings are 300,000. It's political offseason, so everybody goes down a little bit. But this is why they're looking for the liberal Joe Rogan.

Let's start from the beginning. MSNBC revamped their lineup, hoping to bring in some new ratings. And they brought in some nobodies, people without merit, talent, insight, capability, and their ratings are done. Now, I know I've said this before. Democrat media machine cable news is dead. And that's why I said, like, we can do this every single week, to be honest. But here's the point I want to get to with this segment.

Right now, these news outlets are talking about how MSNBC's ratings couldn't crack one million. And that is specifically in 70 plus demographics, the 70 plus demographic. Fox News does 3.5 million in the 70 plus. And I call it the 70 plus because it's the average, all viewers. But they're only doing a couple hundred thousand in the key demo. What does that mean? My friends, Fox News even can't sustain this budget anymore.

spending this much money if they're not getting enough views. Now, 300,000 ain't so bad. But right now, let's take a look at the numbers. MSNBC getting 700,000 views. Sure, they can sell some products because they're getting 700K views. That's not bad. They can sell ad rates or maybe $8,000 or $9,000 on their cable network. And they could maybe pull in 80K per hour. Seriously, just in one hour.

But is that going to cover the exorbitant salaries they're paying the staff? What's going to happen is they're going to drop down the salaries of these individuals, likely the reason why they're doing this revamping. They can't afford it anymore. But the big picture, we don't have to even wait 10 years. What's going to happen is a cascade failure. Right now for cable TV networks, they're largely selling ads to old people. Pharmaceutical ads, reverse mortgages, for real. I watch them and that's largely what they do. This means...

that they are sustained primarily by services to the elderly who are going to start dying off. They already are, but, you know, it's going to happen. The boomers are going to die. We don't need to wait for every boomer to die. It might only be around 10 or 20 percent when they can no longer sustain the infrastructure of their studios based on how many viewers they're getting. Let's actually read the story here from the Daily Mail, and I'll give you some context.

Viewers are fleeing MSNBC just weeks after the liberal network debuted a new primetime lineup in a bid to salvage tumbling viewership. Yep, that backfired. So far this month, MSNBC dropped 41% in the primetime demo and 34% in the total day demo compared to May of 2024. In a stinging blow for Jen Psaki, who on May 5th took over for Rachel Maddow during the 9 p.m. time slot,

Manow, who's been the top host on the network for years, previously said she had faith that Joe Biden's former press secretary would do even better than her in the role. She's not, by the way. Manow temporarily returned as the five-night-a-week primetime host to cover President Donald Trump's first 100 days, but has since retreated to anchoring only Mondays. The latest ratings for the briefing with Jen Psaki came on May 22nd when it failed to crack the coveted one million viewer mark.

Sean Hannity's show on Fox News, which also airs at 9 p.m., had 2.3 million total viewers that night. I don't care. Those are fake numbers. Let's talk about the actual core base of this nation's workforce.

Saki's show performed dismally in the 25 to 54 key age demo, only pulling in 55,000 viewers in that category. By comparison, Hannity had 210,000 viewers in that demo. It's all done. It's all garbage. I am sick of it. It's over. You know what, man? There will be likely more viewers in the key demo on this video than

then these cable TV channels can muster up. Now, to be fair, we're in a political offseason, so my segments, I think we're averaging like 150, whereas, you know, this is how it goes. Midterm year, you get a decent boost of views. Like, the viewership goes up. Then you have primary year, presidential primary year starts to go up. Then you have presidential election year, which is chaos. There's the one year in the cycle this year,

They're not so good. Views aren't so great. So naturally, views are down. But let me just stress, my friends, I believe we don't have the complete ratings from last night's Timcast IRL.

Because it's not even been 12 hours. Well, it's been, I think, literally 12 hours. But the night before, I think we're looking at 650 to 700,000, which puts it around 550 to 600 in the key demo, not including segments. We factor in all of the ancillary posts. We do maybe, I think we're doing right now, maybe like two to three million views total for the content produced off one episode. But for the full episode itself,

Two hour long show. Technically, it's a three hour long show on Rumble. We're looking at around 650, 700 for just the episode two nights ago. A week before that, some of the episodes were doing seven or 800. And after a few weeks, we hit that number. I am proud to say that. And call it humble bragging, call it gloating, whatever you want. What I am sick of is this world that we live in.

where the opinions of people no one listens to are treated as breaking news. You know, I sat down with Bill Maher last week. It's come up quite a bit because his conversation's fresh. But I mentioned there's never going to be another Bill Maher. He's had a political talk show since 1993. And I called it, well, that was politically incorrect. And then he started real time, I think in like what, 2000 or something or 97. And I'm like, this guy's been doing political media for 30 years.

The show is the most consequential politically. It's not necessarily getting the same views as it once got. Fair. But it's been on for a long time. My point was, if Bill Maher gives an opinion, they write it up like headline news. And they did. Actually, let me see if I can pull this one up. It's funny.

Here we go. Daily Mail did this one. And you can look at any of the big media tracking websites. Daily Mail says, Bill Maher slams liberals, unloads on liberals over relentless support of Hamas. Are you effing kidding me? Funny, this is literally a clip from the episode I was on. This is my point. And I don't mean to disrespect Bill. That's not what I'm saying. Bill Maher, Megyn Kelly, and Joe Rogan, they say things and their opinions are headline news. It's fascinating, right?

Joe Rogan gets the views. Megyn Kelly does pretty well. And Bill Maher does okay. There are much bigger shows. Stephen Crowder, of course, being the biggest live stream in the country as of now on average. That's crazy, right? And my point is the corporate press doesn't write about Stephen Crowder's opinions. We are never going to have these kind of personalities again where people just want to know what they think. Or there is this view that what they say is law, that what they say is authoritative. Rachel Maddow maybe had that.

She's not pulling in the numbers. She doesn't want to do the job anymore. So they bring in Jen Psaki. Nobody cares what she has to say. Nobody cares what I have to say. And I mean that somewhat, not necessarily literally. I'm saying that obviously you guys care, the viewers we have care, but the press institutions do not view any of the new shows and young people as having any merit or authority in this space. This is the big picture. The narrative machine is dead.

They keep talking about this, right? CBS finished first overall with an average audience of 3.517 million views. Wow. Are you going to show me how many you had in the key demo? Because if it's comparable to anyone else, it's probably 100,000. This is the curse that we have dealt with as millennials. And don't get me wrong, millennials are entitled and lazy too. Gen Z. Millennials are stunted. They act like children. Gen Z can't buy houses, act like children.

And it's because the older generation views themselves with the utmost of ego. I am not saying every single boomer. It is funny that when I bring this up, I get that not all boomers. I'm like, bro, I am not talking about literally every single person. I'm not saying everyone's guilty of all this. I am saying that when you zoom out on our culture, what do you see? Every level from politics to media to sports look alike.

older generations as though they are the experts and millennials do not step up and Gen Z does not step up. Gen Z doesn't own property. Millennials don't own property. And they blame the boomers and all that. Whatever the issue is, you can look at our political class.

octogenarians. You can look at property owners, septogenarians. You can take a look at media, like whose opinion matters in media? The 70-year-olds, the 60-year-olds. Bill Maher's 69 years old. Joe Rogan's in his 50s. That's actually fine. I don't know how old Megyn Kelly is. Is she in her 50s? Megyn Kelly is 54. And I think that's largely okay.

What are that? Gen Xers. That's that's that's that's good. That's good. Bill Maher, 70. But I mean, when it's these people, they give their opinions. Tucker Carlson was there for a minute. Now, not so much. My point is largely this. The narrative machine is dead. It is dying. It has been dying for some time. But for whatever reason, the institutions in this country only view them as the experts.

Don't get me wrong. Some Gen Z people have built prominence. There are millennials who have built prominence. Obviously, I have a large show. Steven Crowder has a large show. My point is this country largely looks up to older people as if they're the ones who know best instead of being arrogant little pricks who say we're smarter than you. You did wrong. We are taking over. It's true in politics and media, especially to the main point. As I wrap this up, MSNBC is dead. Fox News is even dying.

They talk about the millions of viewers they're getting, but we don't need to wait 10 years for boomers to be 82 years old to see them start dying off. And then the right, like these networks are going to collapse well before then. And I'm surprised they still exist at this point. I'd be willing to bet that the salaries they're giving to these hosts is probably like a couple hundred thousand dollars. Still really good. Just not the 30 or $40 million they were getting before the previous hosts. How this will affect the landscape. I don't know.

Because Bill Maher, like I said, is 70 years old. He's not going to be doing this forever. And even today, he's late on the intake. When it comes to the news, he's behind by a week or two because he still consumes news in an old-fashioned way. At some point, there is going to be a hard reckoning financially and politically in this country because you can't just keep pretending like these archaic institutions have authority. And we're already watching it happen now. My point.

They don't get any views among the working class, among the working base of this country. 70,000 views. Yo, I can film a video of me doing the chicken dance and get way more views than that. Yet, everyone talks and acts like they matter. Course correction is going to be swift. I'll wrap it up there. Smash the like button. Share the show with everyone you know. Stay tuned. We got more coming up for you. And we'll see you all in a little bit.

Yes, ladies and gentlemen, you read that right. The King of Canada, King Charles of the UK, has just given Canada back to the Native Americans or the Native Canadians. And I mean, it's North America, so, you know, not literally, but he may as well have. And this is what's funny about this. So King Charles comes to Canada and he performs what's called a land acknowledgement where he says we are on the unceded territory of the indigenous peoples.

Okay, the reason why that's funny is, yeah, Canada's not going to give any kind of, they're not going to just dissolve government and say, okay, Native Americans, you're in charge now. Indigenous Canadians, I'm sorry. But this is the king acknowledging the territory is currently occupied by an external force. Yo, he's stripping himself of legitimacy at a time when Donald Trump is claiming Canada is considering becoming the 51st state.

That would mean unceded territory literally means the native peoples, the landholders have not given up their claim nor rights to this land. And the king acknowledging this is stating we have we are an occupying force and are not a legitimate government. Now, of course, the left, I would love, love, love.

The liberals, the woke left to come out and say, no, Tim, actually, Canada does own the land. Okay, let's play ball. We can have it one of two ways.

Right. The first is that a land acknowledgement where the king says we are occupying this land that creates illegitimacy of government or or hear me out. We can have it go the other way. And that is when we conquer a land, it's ours and we owe them nothing. Pick one, ladies and gentlemen. Let me play this video for you and then let's talk about what it means for the king of Canada.

King Charles, to say outright, outright, this land belongs to the indigenous. I would like to acknowledge that we are gathered on the unceded territory of the Algonquin and the Chinabeg people. Really? This land acknowledgement is a recognition of shared history as a nation. While continuing to deepen my own understanding...

Uh-huh. Okay, okay, let's be real.

Do you really believe that the UK is going to just say to the Canadian government, you are hereby under the authority direction of the native Algonquin and what is it, Anishinaabeg people? I wasn't trying to be disparate. I'm trying to get it right. The Algonquin and Anishinaabeg people.

No, of course not. It's stupid, liberal, woke platitudes. But I will accept it because this creates illegitimacy of government, which means the indigenous could now say, as this is unseated territory for which you are illegally or illegitimately occupying by your own acknowledgement. Hey, Trump, you want Canada?

What if Trump goes to name like this? This is what Trump should do. This is what I would do if I was president. This is why I'll never be president. I'd go to the Native American tribes and say, hey, let's make a deal. You join the United States as a territory and we will give you full autonomy.

Literally just have your tribes declare this land we cede to the U.S. under the pretext we have full authority, and should that authority and autonomy not be recognized, we have the right to rescind. Now, of course, they'd never do it. I don't know. I would do it, though. I'd say, you know, if I was Trump, Algonquin people and Anishinaabeg people, okay? Okay.

Join the United States under the Golden Dome, and we will give you full governmental control of all Canadian territory. It's yours. The king said so. And then something interesting happens. Let's say the native Canadians are like, yeah, I'll take it. What if they were like, hey, we'll do this. We'll give you $20 billion to your tribes and your people divvied up as you see fit if you join the United States. Then Canada's going to be like, no, you can't do it. Up, up, up.

The king said unceded territory and they have ceded it to us. You are an illegitimate occupying force on our land now. I know none of it would ever actually happen, but this is the stupidity of the games they play. We know Canada does not literally intend to give the land back. They're just playing stupid games. They're fanning their offals, their affluent white female liberals saying, look at us.

truth and reconciliation for the poor indigenous people. They don't mean anything by it. I'd like to see now, with this declaration by the King of Canada, okay, it's true, he's the King of Canada, right? That's what they call him. King Charles, King of Canada. I'd like to see legal challenges from the indigenous. In fact, there are Algonquin people who live in the United States, and they can file a lawsuit too. I think they absolutely should and say,

challenging the courts. The king has declared that you are an illegitimate occupying force on our land for which we have never ceded to you. Make them say it. By what right do you remain here? Okay, let's be real. The British gave up Hong Kong recently. They gave up India. They've lost South Africa. That was largely the Boers though, but there was some British there. Come on, let's play ball. Let's take the woke ideology to its natural conclusion.

Trump claims Canada considering offer of free Golden Dome in exchange for becoming 51st state. Let's play. You know, what I really can't stand is it's not that nothing ever happens, is that people have no balls. I got no balls. Like, do something. Can I get a stick and just poke something and say, come on, do anything. And don't get me wrong, it's been a chaotic political decade. You know, I think the young people...

Like 25 year olds today, they were teenagers during the Trump beginning of the Trump era. And so they weren't really active in politics. And then when they get their 20s, this is the normal state of politics, which is chaos and insanity. Don't get me wrong. But my point is largely like.

You know, Trump does things. He's a bit of a wild guy. I can respect that. King Charles saying that Canada is actually Native Americans. They've never they've never ceded it. Plus, there's no treaties. The natives should file a petition to the U.N. and say we want our land back. King the king said it. That's some kind of precedent, right? Maybe. But I want to see some something. Trump does a lot. I don't see him doing this, but I want it. I want it.

I want something big and bold to happen. That's why the 51st state stuff makes me laugh. Now, it's just words and words don't go far. The Greenland stuff, largely just words. They don't go far. I want to see some action. I don't want Canada to be the 51st state, mind you, because they're a bunch of lefty wackaloons. But if they have no legitimacy of government and the Canadian people are an illegitimate occupying force and they can't vote, OK, fine.

Like, let's play ball, dude. This is the world these people want to live in. Here's what we'll do. We'll go to each and every one of the Canadians and say, who owns the land you're on? You, the colonizers, or the natives? And when they say natives, be like, okay, no voting rights for you. What about you, sir? He's like, no, I live here. I was born here. Okay, you get to vote. That's your belief system. We are just honoring it. But these people are liars and they're hypocrites. They will never, they will never accept that Canada doesn't belong to them, despite the fact the king said it.

But I will say this. I will say this. I shouldn't say never. Never say never. This could be the snowball rolling down the hill. And that is there are a growing faction of ultra liberals who would virtue signal by, look, they don't own land anyway. And they're going to be like, no, this land is Native Americans. Ha ha. Because they want the system to break down. The king panders to these people because he's an idiot.

And what happens in 10 or 20 years? These young people that legitimately believe the land is owned by the Canadians will be in courts. They will be in law. Look at that Judge Dugan who helped the illegal immigrant escape. These people chant, make Canada Mexico again. Canada's got them too. It is entirely plausible that in 10 years...

20-something-year-old woke lunatics are in government, are in the judiciary in their 30s, and they hear a lawsuit where they're like, 10 years ago on this date, the king said, we have never given up our land. It is our land. And that means you are illegitimate. And the judge is going to go, you're right. We vacate. There was already a ruling from the Supreme Court where I think they gave back half of Kansas or something. Like, legit. Like, just crazy rulings. So I'm going to say it one more time. Let's play ball. We can have it one of two ways.

Either you really don't think that the Native Americans own the land and that you and claim you are claiming you have conquered it, regardless of what you say. I'm cool with that. I am cool with that because I would be like, yes, we, too, the United States have also conquered this land. It's ours now. Or y'all's king acknowledged you don't own the land. And I'd be more than happy to see the Canadian government disbanded and dissolved as an illegitimate occupying force.

Maybe we need to start coordinating with the Algonquin people as the legitimate government of Canada. That's what you get. Keep playing stupid games. I know that no one's going to do anything. I just wish. I'll wrap it up there. Stay tuned. We got more segments coming up for you. Smash the like button. Share the show with everyone you know. Follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast. We'll see y'all in the next bit.

And it's exactly as predicted. Kash Patel is sounding the alarm on a disturbing rise of copycat assassination threats against Donald Trump because former FBI director James Comey posted his 8647 Instagram image. Now, he did take it down and said he didn't realize I got to fix the blur. There we go. He didn't realize what it meant. But of course, that was not correct. And then we saw a wave of liberal pundits posting the exact same thing.

And while James Comey may maintain he did not know what it meant, we think he's lying. The point was there are now many individuals who know exactly what 86 means and are intentionally using it as to mean someone should take the life of the president. Now, my friends, we've already seen a wave of posts from far leftists that had been calling for action against Trump, against Elon Musk. And I say action, I mean calling for violence and death.

This just made things worse. And when this happened, it's exactly what I said they were trying to accomplish. To create an atmosphere where large swaths of individuals can call for violence, but just defer to, I don't know, the former FBI director said it. They didn't arrest and prosecute him. So why would they arrest and prosecute me? I didn't do anything wrong. I was simply saying what everyone else already said. No one really thinks it means to kill.

You know, I've heard the rumors, the memes and all that stuff that urban legends. Where does 86 come from? In restaurants say 86 the French fries, meaning somebody doesn't want them or 86 this guy, meaning like we're not going to serve him. But the mafia, many people claim that a Vegas would say 80 miles out and six feet under. 86. Actually, 86.

There's a much better explanation for 86. A grave is eight feet long and six feet deep. 86. There's a bunch of different ways to interpret it, but all of the numbers make more sense as murder than just throwing something away. The urban legends are that in a restaurant, there was a number 86 order that one day was out. They said 86 is out. Bull. I don't believe that for two seconds. That's nonsense. Eight miles out and six feet deep.

Makes sense. 80 miles out, six feet deep. Makes sense. Or eight feet long, six feet deep is a grave. And, you know, the width doesn't matter as much as the length and the depth. A body needs to fit and it's got to be buried to where nobody finds it. So, my friends, we're going to get into all that stuff. Plus, we are going to be joined later on by Tom Homan to discuss the

deportation plans, revoking of visas, as well as securing the border and the mass deportations they're planning. So it's going to be great. That'll be around 30 minutes or so from now, about 1230 for those that are watching live. Shout out to Steven Crowder and the Mug Club. This is your Rumble Morning lineup. I am transitioning you into the afternoon here. It's noon.

I'm your host, Tim Pool. You can follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast. Before we get started, my friends, make sure you check out boonieshq.com and pick up one of these great skateboards. We got so much great art for you guys. And we are going to be rolling out our Pride Month collection.

I'm I'm I'm winking for those that are just listening to the audio and not actually watching. But we do have a variety of humorous, fun boards that'll be released soon. This is why we're trying to promote the ones that we currently have. The 28th Amendment, the right to keep bear in breed chickens. We've got the boobies, which is a funny little blue footed booby bird. Don't forget, step on snack and find out as well as the right to arm bears.

If you believe that bears should be wearing flannel shirts, straw hats, and brandishing shotguns, then I recommend this skateboard. It's funny because the default size is 7.75, which if you don't skate, you don't really know much. But these sell the fastest because it's just the default board to put on your wall. But we do appreciate it. Smash that like button. Share the show with everyone you know. Let's get into that news, my friend. Let me just say real quick. If everybody watching this right now, live, shared this video, we'd have the biggest new show in the world.

We would shatter the ratings of basically every other major show. And that would be something. So don't just do it for me. You know, you guys watching the Rumble Morning lineup, make sure you're sharing when you're watching Vince or Vita or Steven Crowder or Jeremy or Russell Brand. Make sure you're always sharing the links. And let's help make this something bigger with your assistance. You know, these companies spend hundreds of millions of dollars on marketing.

Imagine if instead of having to spend hundreds of millions, hundreds of millions of dollars, you just had 300000 people who shared a video and you were bigger and better than all of their marketing combined. Here's a story from the Daily Mail. They say FBI Director Kash Patel said his bureau has been overwhelmed by copycat threats to Donald Trump's life after James Comey shared a controversial Instagram post calling to 8647.

Patel told Fox News' Brett Baier that the FBI, the former FBI director's post, which showed seashells on a beach arranged in the numbers, forced him to redirect resources as Trump's critics followed suit. The term 86 is often used in hospitality to mean to mean get rid of something, but has also been used in the mafia to mean a grave eight feet long and six feet deep.

There's an article. So when this story broke, I did all the research on the origin of the term. And while the dictionaries and all of the institutions try to say, you know, back in the 1900s, there was a soda jerk and number 86 was unavailable. So he said 86 is out. And now everyone just says 86. I don't buy it. It's stupid. That makes no sense. Maybe, I guess. But then you think about eight feet long, six feet deep, eight miles out, six feet deep.

And it also means 86 to get rid of something. Yeah, OK, I think that it probably is referring to a gravesite. Makes a little bit more sense. Still don't know for sure. But there are numerous articles that I had pulled up already where in Vegas specifically, 86 means to murder. Interesting. There's also tons of slang dictionaries that point out 86 means to murder somebody.

Quote, do you know how many copycats we've had to investigate as a result of that beachside venture from the former director? Do you know how many agents I've had to take offline from chasing down child sex predators, fentanyl traffickers and terrorists? Because everywhere across this country, people are popping up on social media and think that a threat to the life of the president of the United States is a joke and they can do it because Comey did it.

Patel grew frustrated as he said that he has been made to deal with this every single day, adding that he believes Comey thought it was funny to share his seashell post. The FBI did not immediately respond to requests from Daily Mail for details on the threats to Trump's life that they have been inundated with. This was the point that by doing it, Comey was going to allow everyone to call for this. And the left likes to refer to this as stochastic terrorism.

Basically, the phrase is, oh, won't someone rid me of this priest? The goal? Eventually, somebody will take it literally. That's James Comey. If he wants to come after me, no problem. I've been living rent-free in that guy's head for years, and that's just a bonus. Do you know how many copycats we've had to investigate as a result of this?

of that beachside venture from the former director. Do you know how many agents I've had to take offline from chasing down child sex predators, fentanyl traffickers, terrorists? Because everywhere across this country, people are popping up on social media and think that a threat to the life of the president of the United States is a joke and they can do it because he did it.

That's what I'm having to deal with every single day. And that's what I'm having to pull my agents and analysts off because he thought it was funny to go out there and make a political statement. That's James Comey. That was the goal. So you end up with 10,000 people all imitating this behavior. And this is the Antifa tactic. You know, back in the day, we used to call Antifa Black Bloc.

We just call them the black block. It wasn't a reference to an ideology. Typically, they were anarchists or leftists, but not right-leaning anarchists, more of the wackaloon tankies who think they're anarchists or claim to be. And what they would do is they dress in all black so that when they engage in violence, you can't convict them. Even if, let's say there's 10 people all wearing hoodies, sunglasses, and black bandanas and black jeans, and one guy chucks a bottle at somebody's head, the cops grab him and arrest him.

They then go to court and they will say to the officer, did you see this man do it? And they'll say, yes, I did. You saw this man do it. Yes. How did you know it was him? Because we grabbed him as he threw it and arrested him. And you know what this man looks like. And they'll be like, well, I do now. This is the game they play to sow doubt. Even when the cops grab the guy who did it.

The defense will say, is it possible you grabbed the wrong guy? No. But you don't know what the client looks like. That could be a different person. The individual you arrested was wearing a mask. And they'll be like, sure. So you, the arresting officer, didn't actually see or you can't prove. It is crazy that it works because juries just say, listen, I'm not going to do it.

A group of people all wearing black. You can't see their faces and they're throwing stuff. How could the cop have really been sure? He thinks he's sure, but I have reasonable doubt they get away with it. How does that function online? When Comey comes out and says 86, 47, oopsie.

Now, tens of thousands of people all have plausible deniability. They can say, but what do you mean? The FBI director posted it. And then what happens if Cash actually wants to prosecute somebody who intentionally was calling for the death of the president, which is a crime? They're going to argue in court. He was simply imitating the former FBI director, who I might add has not been criminally charged. Now, they may say, yes, but the intention from this individual was different. And they'll say, what do you mean? Prove it. You can't.

That was the goal of this play. Smarmy scumbaggery. From the Hill, Kash Patel says, I won't be lectured by Comey. In an interview on Brett Baier over the 86-47 post, they say that Comey insisted he did not arrange the seashells himself. He just found it like that.

Quote, you know, the FBI is bigger than any leader it's ever had or ever will be, Patel said about the Post. And James Comey is a private citizen and he can walk around the beach and talk about seashells and Crayola crayons for all I care, for all I care about, and talk about how we're the conspiracy theorists. But I'll just remind the American people of one thing.

When that man was the leader of the FBI, he perpetrated the largest criminal conspiracy packaged political information from over packaged political information from overseas, took it to a federal FISA court and illegally surveilled a political opponent. So I won't be lectured on how to run this FBI from that man. Arrest him. Come on. Lock this dude up. Comey should be in jail.

Cash, as the FBI director, went on TV and said, this guy is responsible for the largest criminal conspiracy. Let's go. Guys, a lot of people think that Cash and Dan ain't getting the job done. They're saying now with the, you know, Bongino said we're going to release Epstein video. They're saying it's going to be AI. It's going to be fake. I'm digging it. I am. I am banging the tag. I got my gavel right here. I am banging it saying let's go, Cash.

I want Comey in jail. And I think probably there's many people who probably want him in jail more than me, and Cash is probably at the top of the list because Cash was targeted by these scumbags. Yo, check this out. We got a video. Dan Bongino, listen to what he had to say on Fox this morning. Wait till you read this stuff that's coming out. But does he still have loyalists in the building? Because when I hear the FBI director saying, you guys are finding boxes that are hidden,

Okay, how does that happen in the Bureau? Well, we were there a couple of weeks, and luckily there were a lot of people up there who grabbed us by the arm the minute we came in and said, thank you for being here. You know, we need to talk. There are people there who are really horrified at what happened. And there was a room, and we found stuff, a lot of stuff. A hidden room. I wouldn't call it hidden, but hidden from us at least and not mentioned to us.

And then we found stuff in there. And a lot of it's from the Comey era. And we are working our damnedest right now to declassify. And just so you know, because I get the public, I totally understand people saying, well, do it now. The process is not all the information is ours to declassify. Some is other intelligence agencies. It's not. We literally can't do it. Once that gets done and that gets out there and you read some of the stuff we found that, by the way, was not processed through the normal procedure, digitizing it, putting in FBI records.

We found it in bags hiding under Jim Comey's FBI. You're going to be stunned. That is weird.

THIS MAN IS A DISGRACE. IT'S A LONGER SEGMENT. I MIGHT PLAY JUST A LITTLE BIT. I DON'T KNOW. I HAVE THIS ONE FROM FOX NEWS. BUT IF THEY GO TOO MUCH IN THE WEEDS. IN THE BIDEN ERA, THAT INCLUDES THE 2021 D.C. PIPE BOMBINGS. CHEAP AND THEN WHEN THE OPPORTUNITY COMES TO DO STUFF. I DIDN'T MEAN ME. I MEANT YOU. YOU'RE A FRAUD. YOU DON'T SOUND LIKE A FRAUD. YOU ARE ONE. SO IT WAS A LOT. IT'S BEEN TOUGH ON THE FAMILY.

I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO SAY

You know, they found secret documents. They weren't secret. They were supposed to be. The FBI was filing normally. We talked about it last night on IRL. The question is why, you know, Ian asked, why not just destroy them? Because they'll be criminal. And so what they do is they take documents and put them in a place that you don't expect to find them, but isn't criminal. And then you maybe never find them. And if you do, you say, what do you mean? All the files were just stored there. You didn't ask. Plausible deniability in an effort to cover things up.

Now, I think depending on the scale of what these documents are, they probably destroyed a lot of them as they do and probably have for a long time. But we are now in a deep era, my friends, of political violence. This is just where we're going. Look at this. Dan Bongino drops major truth bomb in FBI's Trump assassination attempt investigation. I want to throw this in there as I'm not I'm not I've got some critiques now for people on the right.

Bongino says there is no there there in the Trump assassination plot, but he specifically makes a reference to foreign influence or something like that. They said that Dan Bongino dropped a bombshell. Where's the quote? Are we going to be surprised at what you learned? He says, I'm not going to tell people what they want to hear. I'm here to tell you the truth and whether you like it or not. He says there is no there there. Actually, let's just play the clip. Are we going to be surprised at what you learned? You know what, Maria? Yeah.

Cash is not kidding. We've been personally briefed extensively on every single detail, nugget, tendril of this case. One is actively in court right now. So out of respect for the case, it's probably more appropriate that I stay quiet on that. However.

I'm not going to tell people what they want to hear. I'm going to tell you the truth. And whether whether you like it or not is up to you. If there was a big explosive there, they're right. Given my history as a Secret Service agent and my personal friendship as a director does with the president. Give me one logical, sensible reason we would not have. If you can think of one, there is a there is your.

The logical reason why they wouldn't release information pertaining to the assassination attempt is that it implicates Trump or Trump-associated individuals in some way.

It would create damage for the U.S. government. It would destroy its credibility and destabilize us internally. If they were to release information showing Democrat individuals or uniparty individuals, neocon or otherwise, were somehow involved in this, it could result in destabilization and riots in the streets. Who knows? There are many logical reasons why they wouldn't release the information. But that being said, there's a lot of people who are critical of Dan and Cash. But you take a look at Cash's statements on Comey.

saying he perpetrated this criminal conspiracy. And I'm sitting back being like, guys, I feel the passion and I'm excited. We're not going to get everything we want. That's never the case. We're not children. So the people out there who are acting like Dan and Cash are somehow doing a bad job, I'm like, this is the best we've ever had it. Now, are they going to go after Comey? I'd like to see so. Maybe they can add the 8647 into their charging document to show intent.

Let's put it this way. Thank you, James Comey, for posting that Instagram post. You know why? When Kash Patel seeks to indict you criminally for the conspiracy against his political opponents, they say he was a Republican or whatever, but we know the difference. When he was overseeing a criminal conspiracy, according to Kash, to damage or remove Donald Trump, we ask ourselves, yes, but did he have motive? Well, no.

He did post 8647, to which he claims just means to get rid of Trump. And then I'll be asked, why did you post it? No reason. Now, do you think a jury is going to believe that he posted 8647? By all means, the defense can argue it doesn't mean to kill Trump. It means to get rid of him. And they'll say, oh, so Comey has wanted to get rid of Trump now for some time, you'd ask. So when we go back and look at the actions that he took as FBI director under Trump, yeah, Trump made a lot of mistakes. Don't get me wrong.

Interesting. Now, let's go back in time because people say, but Comey was Trump's FBI guy. Trump could not fire Comey because of the Russiagate investigation. They they they I mean, he literally could have and he did. But the concern politically was that if he interfered and got rid of Comey, it would only be used as evidence against him that he was shutting down the investigation into Russia. I got to say, Trump should have just done it.

And he should have said the idea that my own departments would be weaponized against me to accuse me of wrongdoing. I will not stand for. But see, Trump tried playing the game. And that's why I hate the game playing. Trump said, OK, let's relax. Hopefully we'll win this one. No, Iron Fist. It's your DOJ. Fire him. Shut it down. No more games. If they want to lose their minds, let them do it. We are not children anymore.

They keep trying to play these games. I'm not interested. Trying to play these games. Now we've got an explosion of death threats. You've got this was a Disney star. Broadway icon says that Trump's Kennedy Center should be blown up, should get blown up. Great. Here we go. What do we have here? We have the the shooting outside of the Jewish Museum where this dude wanted a white genocide of white people. That's how crazy it is.

And of course, the FBI is now probing claims of targeted violence against religious groups after evangelicals protest in Seattle. Freedom of religion isn't a suggestion, Dan Bongino said. We have an escalation of far less violence. We've got Teslas being shot at and set on fire. We've got people calling for places to be blown up, 86-47. They're not backing down from this. We had a group of Christians go to Seattle,

And they held a rally, as they were legally allowed to do, and they were attacked by the far left. Now, there is this story, because I want to make sure we conclude all the context, right? Seattle got owned in the latest free speech battle. We'll give a shout out to this guy, Ross Johnston, who I presume is a leftist masquerading as someone on the right. No, he's probably just someone on the right. Because he tweeted, we started a riot today in Seattle during worship and the gospel. The church is alive. Okay. Well, they wrote this.

A few hours after the Christian rally in Seattle last weekend that ended with 23 protesters getting arrested, one of the founders of the event could scarcely contain his glee. Quote, we started a riot today in Seattle during worship in the gospel, said Ross Johnston, co-leader of Mayday USA, which put on the anti-abortion, anti-trans event. The church is alive. A few minutes later, he explained that revival is messy. Acts 19 is when Paul started a riot in the city of Ephesus. It's game time. Who's ready? No more cute, weak Christians. Okay.

This is exactly what the left needed to legitimize their violence against the right. So shout out to this guy, Ross Johnston, for tweeting this and legitimizing the left's claims that the right instigated the violence intentionally to then false flag the left. That's what you get. You want to lay with the dogs, you get covered in fleas. Congratulations. Now, largely what we see is people showing up for our prayer event.

The far left then shows up to agitate and throw rocks and fight people. And when I believe it was the mayor came out and then said that the right intentionally came here to antagonize and instigate a riot. That doesn't matter. What matters is, do we have a right in this country to go into public places and speak? And the answer is, according to the government, no, because you have ill intent. Well,

The left needed a Cassis Belli, as it were. I use it in a figurative sense. They need a reason to come and attack people. Now they have it. Thanks to this dude who tweeted that the right started the riot intentionally because they want a strong church again. OK, now the left is going to come out. They are going to propagandize all of the left and it's going to escalate the violence. It's accelerationism. I'm not in favor of that. But if this dude is, then fine. We just call it out.

My point ultimately with all of this escalation of the left will likely occur. And I guess expect summer of love 2.0. We keep saying that with this attack in Seattle, that's where many people were going with it. This idea that we were now going to get the next summer of love because when people shut up to peacefully protest and pray, they were attacked. But at least now the left has their reason for escalation. The mayor came out.

attacked the group. The group then held a protest calling for his resignation, and the left came out again and started attacking these rally attendees. If you want the violence, I suppose that's the way you go about doing it. Me, not so much. Now, I would not go so far to say is you shouldn't hold a rally in Seattle, but to tweet out that you started the riot. Okay.

Antifa is going to take that. They're going to go to college campuses. They're going to show everybody that far right fascists, what they'll claim, intentionally started a riot for the purpose of getting the left arrested and invading their space. They are going to say fascists are coming to our town and rioting intentionally and destroying our property. And they'll use that to rally more Democrats. That's why I say this guy's a leftist.

Not that he's literally a leftist, but he may as well be because it's the greatest gift they could have asked for. Some type of legitimacy to use to propagandize, rally and engage in violence. Well, look, anybody on the right who wants to go join the left in their violence, leave the rest of us out of it. Because for the longest time, Trump supporters, people on the right, haven't been engaging in violence. Sometimes, rarely. And the point is.

It doesn't matter if you're left, right, up, down, Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, whatever. You have a right to get a permit for a park and peacefully discuss your ideas. And if someone else is to attack you, they are the problem. They are at fault. They are the fascistic ones. Not if you're all going to go out and claim you intentionally started a riot. So be it. The end result will be the same. There will be escalation of far left violence. And we can expect summer of love.

Summer of Love 2.0, I suppose. That's the nature of how things go, I guess. But my friends, we are going to be joined by Tom Homan. And really excited for this. We're going to talk about the current plans to mass deport to 3,000 people per day, as well as the revoking of student visas. So this will...

That'll do it with the first portion of the show. Smash the like button, share the show with everyone you know. You can follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast. That interview will be up at youtube.com slash TimCast at 4 p.m. and also rumble.com slash Tim Pool if you want to watch it there. Make sure you guys check out TimCast IRL tonight at 8 p.m. Thanks for hanging out, and we will see you all then.