Facebook Announces END OF CENORSHIP In HUGE Victory, ADMITS Deep State FORCED Censorship On META
01:48:56 Share

Yesterday, we heard major breaking news that UFC's Dana White would be joining the board of Meta. And we knew right away this was a massive shift from the political narrative machine that we had seen over the past decade, especially with the Donald Trump victory. Dana White joining Meta means that censorship ain't going to be lasting long. And this morning, Mark Zuckerberg put out a video where he basically said, and this is I'm going to go right for the meat and potatoes here.

The U.S. government basically made them censor people. Well, I'll say this. He's going to be getting rid of the fact checker program in favor of community notes, which is a good thing. They're going to end the restrictions on certain political content and on civic content in general. All good things which may actually help restore Facebook, which is basically dead at this point. Everyone in media and advertising knows it.

Too little, too late there, brother. The U.S. government bet you over the knee and whip cracked you on the back and you destroyed your platform. But I'll say this. It's good that it's happening. It really, really is. And I'm excited to see it. But maybe a little too little too late. I'm reminded, my friends, of the film Dogma. Have you guys ever seen that movie? It's Kevin Smith film from like 1999. And Jason Lee plays a character named Azriel, who is a demon.

And he is upset because when the war between heaven and hell erupted, he stood on the sidelines. He was amused. He had no place in battle. And I'm reminded of this. The sit back, wait and see who wins because I don't want to be involved and have no convictions method. Sure.

Elon Musk bought X because they censored, well, not just because they censored Babylon B, but largely because Babylon B got censored. Elon was like, that's ridiculous. Of course, Elon also has a desire for the everything app. He wanted X. Buying up 300 million users made a lot of sense, so he made the move. He made the play. Well,

Elon, although he did not immediately go full hardcore free speech, did bring back many users, did improve the platform. And what did we see? The federal government all of a sudden has these SEC, FTC investigations into Elon's companies. A judge just says, we're blocking your pay package for Tesla, despite the fact the shareholders twice voted for him to get paid. I being one of them, I have a decently small portfolio.

A share of Tesla stock and, you know, monetarily, it's not insignificant, but it's not like anything massive. And I was asked to vote and I voted Elon Musk should get his pay because I want the CEO leading this company to be incentivized. I'm not concerned about how much money he's getting. I want Tesla stock to go up.

And I got denied. The shareholders voted. They said, no, we want Elon to get paid for this. And a judge twice said no. For what reason? Some guy with a handful of shares? This is there's no way you're convincing me it's anything other than government interference because Elon Musk refused to bend the knee. As for Mr. Zuckerberg, you know, that dude bent the knee so fast.

So while in this video release, he does say the U.S. government is pressuring us. We're going to work with the Trump admin and we're going to fight for freedom. All really incredible stuff. Zuckerberg's not showing himself to be a strong individual, perhaps savvy business wise.

And I'm glad to see it. And maybe, maybe, you know, his newfound love of UFC and he's been training BJJ and maybe he's getting that testosterone up. Maybe he's finally figuring out where his pair really went, if he ever had one. And now he's making moves. But look, it's the safe play right now. In fact, it's I got to be honest, it's actually the kind of cowardly play. If Zuckerberg actually ever supported the Democrat narrative machine, then when Trump came in, if you want to have balls, he'd say, screw you, Trump.

I ain't going to bend the knee for you, but clearly fair, fair weather friends, we call it. The wind blows and Mark Zuckerberg says, oh, me, oh, my. Oh, but you know what? I'm not going to rag on the Zuck. You know, I'll criticize him for that. But then I'll just say, let's take the victory where we can and utilize this opportunity to maximize.

A narrative that promotes meritocracy, the real American dream, strong traditional values. And I'm not saying all the bad stuff the liberals are going to cry and complain. I'm saying the good stuff. Christmas morning, apple pie, baseball. Come on. Things this country used to be about. So I'm for it. I'm super excited to see Dana White on the board. This gives me confidence because even if Zuckerberg is a smarmy dude, I got to give him this.

He's got two people. He's got Kaplan and he's got Dana White joining. And with this move, it's going to restrict government intervention in a similar way if Trump gets out of office. It's not perfect, but I'm glad to see that we're here. Let's jump into this news, though. We'll play this video for you. Before we do, my friends, head over to cast brew dot com and buy cast brew coffee. Take a look at this two weeks till Christmas. Phil's Holiday Blend gingerbread coffee. In fact, it is two weeks from Christmas, but it's still good.

And it's going to be a limited run, so make sure you pick up your bag with Phil Labonte of All That Remains. Dress to Santa Claus while you can. Of course, we've got Alex Stein's Primetime Grind, two times caffeine. I don't know that that man needs many more caffeine, but...

We've also got Stand Your Grounds. We've got Columbian Whole Bean. We got Ian's Graphene Dream back in stock, ladies and gentlemen. And this is actually kind of crazy because as much as people complain about Ian and some people really love him, his coffee sells gangbusters. He sold 5,350 bags, and I think we're already half sold out of his latest run. People really love Ian's Graphene Dream. He's a coffee guy. There you go. But also, go to TimCast.com, click Join Us, become a member.

Because we need your support. You as a member, you make all of this possible. The entire time we have been fighting against censorship, political censorship, and fake news from the corporate press. We have only won this battle because of people like you supporting websites like TimCast.com and shows like this, as well as many others. Steven Crowder, for instance, Viva Frye, big fans of those guys. I'll always shout him out.

There have been many people who have stood up to the narrative machine and taken great risk to do it. And wait, aren't they both Canadian? Anyway.

It's not just about TimCast.com, but when you become a member, you'll get access to our Discord server. The reason why we built this, if they ban us, if they try to shut us down, which it's going the other direction, I might add. But when they do, we want to build these communities so that you guys can stay connected. So another reason why Cast Brew is launching franchising. It's not about making a billion dollar empire. That'd be nice. No, it's about creating physical spaces because the founding fathers organized a revolution in bars and pubs.

places where we can gather and share ideas because the censorship machine will stop you from speaking. So that's the plan, man. If you want to join that movement, join that mission, go to TimCast.com, click join us, become a member, and we've got some big moves coming up. Some big, big moves. A lot of big moves. But let's do this. Here's the story first, and we'll jump into the Dana White stuff. I mean, the news is basically that, right? But Mark Zuckerberg himself has issued this video, and...

You know, I got to be honest. I don't care to actually hear what this man has to say. But the truth is, what he says is so dang important. We got to play it. It's five minutes. I think the most important thing to understand is that he breaks down how the U.S. government.

Hey, everyone. I want to talk about something important today because it's time to get back to our roots around free expression on Facebook and Instagram.

Sure you do.

But there's also a lot of legitimately bad stuff out there: drugs, terrorism, child exploitation. These are things that we take very seriously and I want to make sure that we handle responsibly. So we built a lot of complex systems to moderate content. But the problem with complex systems is they make mistakes. Even if they accidentally censor just 1% of posts, that's millions of people. And we've reached a point where it's just too many mistakes and too much censorship.

The recent elections also feel like a cultural tipping point towards once again prioritizing speech. So we're going to get back to our roots and focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies, and restoring free expression on our platforms. More specifically, here's what we're going to do.

First, we're going to get rid of fact-checkers and replace them with community notes similar to X starting in the US. Good. After Trump first got elected in 2016, the legacy media wrote non-stop about how misinformation was a threat to democracy.

We tried in good faith to address those concerns without becoming the arbiters of truth. No, you didn't. But the fact checkers have just been too politically biased and have destroyed more trust than they've created. He knew this the whole time. We all knew this the whole time. It took a layman only one day of looking at how the fact checkers were censoring all of this news to realize it was a broken system. And I'm going to give this old Zuckerberg. Look, man, I don't trust the guy as far as I can throw him.

The dude, the story of social media censorship emerged when it became clear. Whistleblowers helped make it clear that the Facebook trending news tab was intentionally removing conservative stories. Or I should say stories that emerged from conservative sources were being deleted from the trending tab because these people are evil cultists. And Zuckerberg knew the whole time.

So, bro, too little, too late, I guess. I'm happy that you're finally turning it around. Maybe we can get back to using your platform.

A way for us all to try and do a little bit better than we did last year. And my resolution, unlike big wireless, is to not be a raging a**hole and raise the price of wireless on you every chance I get. Give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch. $45 upfront payment required, equivalent to $15 per month. New customers on first three-month plan only. Taxes and fees extra. Speeds lower above 40 gigabytes on unlimited. See mintmobile.com for details. Let me throw this in there, guys, and then we'll play the rest of this video.

We're we're in. I've been since for a while. It's ad negotiating season. The season is basically and it's like the end of the year for contracts because there's something called upfronts where they sell a bunch of ads upfront. And so negotiations are basically over. And we're we here. We're finalizing some contracts and things like this. But let me just tell you, man, all of these companies have said it outright. Facebook's dead. It's dead.

And I've talked to these companies and I said, we also have, you know, here's our Facebook offering. We've talked to these companies that look, we got tremendous upside in that we don't actually use Facebook. And they laugh and they're like, nobody does anymore. It's a dead platform. Zuckerberg burned it to the ground. They're not saying it like that. They're just saying you can't make money on Facebook because the machine will remove your posts and then you get banned and you get demonetized. What's the point?

I find it really funny that the US government goes Zuckerberg and they say, "Drop to your knees, kiss the pinky ring." Zuckerberg says, "Sure," and burns Facebook to the ground. What a moron. Especially in the US. So over the next couple of months, we're going to phase in a more comprehensive community notes system. Second, we're going to simplify our content policies and get rid of a bunch of restrictions on topics like immigration and gender that are just out of touch with mainstream discourse.

What started as a movement to be more inclusive has increasingly been used to shut down opinions and shut out people with different ideas, and it's gone too far. So I want to make sure that people can share their beliefs and experiences on our platforms. Third, we're changing how we enforce our policies to reduce the mistakes that account for the vast majority of censorship on our platforms. We used to have filters that scanned for any policy violation.

Now, we're going to focus those filters on tackling illegal and high severity violations. And for lower severity violations, we're going to rely on someone reporting an issue before we take action. The problem is that the filters make mistakes, and they take down a lot of content that they shouldn't. So by dialing them back, we're going to dramatically reduce the amount of censorship on our platforms. We're also going to tune our content filters to require much higher confidence before taking down content.

The reality is that this is a trade-off. It means we're going to catch less bad stuff, but we'll also reduce the number of innocent people's posts and accounts that we accidentally take down. Fourth, we're bringing back civic content. For a while, the community asked to see less politics because it was making people stressed, so we stopped recommending these posts. But it feels like we're in a new era now, and we're starting to get feedback that people want to see this content again.

So we're going to start phasing this back into Facebook, Instagram, and threads while working to keep the communities friendly and positive. Fifth, we're going to move our trust and safety and content moderation teams out of California and our US-based content review is going to be based in Texas. As we work to promote free expression, I think that will help us build trust to do this work in places where there is less concern about the bias of our teams.

Finally, we're going to work with President Trump to push back on governments around the world. They're going after American companies and pushing to censor more. I just want to pause here and say based AF. And I don't think it's a move by Zuckerberg. I think it's a move by Trump. Zuckerberg was going to mention that all these laws are popping up in secret courts. Donald Trump is going to use the weight of U.S. power to force these countries to heal. And I'm here for it.

The US has the strongest constitutional protections for free expression in the world. Europe has an ever-increasing number of laws institutionalizing censorship and making it difficult to build anything innovative there. Latin American countries have secret courts that can order companies to quietly take things down. China has censored our apps from even working in the country.

The only way that we can push back on this global trend is with the support of the U.S. government. Oh, yeah. And that's why it's been so difficult over the past four years when even the U.S. government has pushed for censorship. By going after us and other American companies, it has emboldened other governments to go even further. And that's where we get the bombshell. Zuckerberg basically admitting, along what we've known, the U.S. government was forcing them to censor. Now, by all means,

Zuckerberg could have went the Elon route and said, try me. And you know, I have very little respect for this. Mark, it's very weak. Okay? I don't trust you. I think it's smarmy. It's very weak. You know, when the first adpocalypse happened on YouTube, this is like 2018 or something. For those that aren't familiar, it's basically all the advertisers started coming out saying, we're not going to advertise on YouTube because you have extremist content. And it was BS.

Wall Street Journal, New York Times, other I believe was kicked off by the Wall Street Journal, started claiming that YouTube was a hub for extremism and scared advertisers. So YouTube went to advertise, said, please, please don't pull your ad dollars. What must we do? And thus came demonetization and censorship of many innocent entrepreneurs who did nothing wrong. I certainly posted no extremist content. Why did I lose money?

Well, YouTube would have you believe. I'm sorry. The advertisers were pulling their money and there's nothing we can do about it. You know what? I'm sick of this culture of cowards because, homie, you want to go to war. I will give you a war. You know, you guys watching Landman. What a great what a great show. Spoilers for those that haven't watched it. But basically, there's a lawyer and she is nasty.

And she basically goes to a character and she says, effectively, I'm going to frame you for murder. If you don't back the F off and let me get my settlement. And the dude, I was so satisfied to see this walks in and says, double the offer, double how much you're paying us. You're going to war. I'm like,

Let me tell you the kind of person I am. Someone comes to me with a smile on their face and says, you're going to do what I want or else I'll be like, I'll take the or else I am going to burn you to the ground. If you go to war with me, you will regret it.

And so when I see the adpocalypse on YouTube, I told this to Google. I told this to my rep, not that they're high enough to do anything. I said, why don't you tell this advertiser, if you pull your dollars, we will offer a promotion to your chief competitor, giving them half off and the masthead. We will double their reach overnight on the most prominent platform, and you will lose 20% of your market share overnight. Play me.

They don't do it because they're cowards. So when Zuckerberg is faced with this pressure, he says, oh, you know, I'll censor all the conservatives, only digging himself deeper. Because when Biden and the Democrats end up winning, they bend you over and whip you again. Elon Musk, what did he say? He said, try me. And they sent the SEC, the FTC. They tried to burn him down. They blocked his Tesla pay package. I know it was a judge in Delaware, but come on.

You think I'm going to believe that this wasn't political gamesmanship? This wasn't lawfare against them? So I respect Elon for this. I do not respect Mark Zuckerberg at all. I'll give him a little bit. Turning it around now is the right move. But he's only doing it because Trump's in power. And once again, the little boy is scared. I got no respect for Mark Zuckerberg. Again, I'll say a little bit for doing the right thing now. But he's only doing it because Trump gets in power and says, you lose on your knee. It's scumbaggery. Okay?

When the federal government came to Facebook, Zuckerberg should have said, here's what we're going to do. You come at me with your strong arm tactics and we will overnight make sure Democrats never win an election again. Try me. And instead he said, I'll do anything you say. But now we have the opportunity to restore free expression and I am excited to take it. It'll take time to get this right. And these are complex systems. They're never going to be perfect.

There's also a lot of illegal stuff that we still need to work very hard to remove. But the bottom line is that after years of having our content moderation work focus primarily on removing content, it is time to focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our systems, and getting back to our roots about giving people voice. I'm looking forward to this next chapter. Stay good out there, and more to come soon.

Indeed. Well, I do think we're seeing some good stuff. I got to be honest. And I think a lot of what we're seeing is, I'll be real, UFC has become massively popular. I think Mark Zuckerberg got, he became a fan of UFC. I believe he's been training in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu. I mean this seriously. His testosterone has probably been going up and he's probably found a pair. I got to admit, bringing Dana White on helps ensure that in the future,

You don't have these problems because someone like Dana White ain't going to play games. I love UFC, man, because, you know, these UFC fighters, many of them are based. And then you ask yourself, why are so many UFC fighters pro Trump? Why are they based? You know, because they're not scared of you. There's very little to be scared of when you get punched in the head for a living, largely because maybe you have CTE and you don't know to be scared. I'm kidding, guys. Or because you're made, you're carved out of stone and you're like, ain't nothing you can do to me.

That's the thing about strong men. They don't move when they know what must be, when they know what is right. They say, try me because these guys face down a brutal beating in the ring for a living. And you get a lot of these people, these old Zuckerberg types. He looked like data from Star Trek. And he's like, well, OK, I guess I'll do what you say now. Oh, boy. Probably became a fan. Started training.

Look at him. His skin looks better. His hair looks better. And now all of a sudden he's coming around on free speech. I got to be honest. I think the dude found some testosterone. They say working out makes you right wing only because right wing is anything the left isn't. And if you actually exercise and you're a man and you build muscle mass, you might find with high testosterone that, you know, it's really fascinating. They say guys are less agreeable. Now, let me tell you something about dudes. There are the pathetic low T men everywhere.

Who are just like, I'm going to say whatever I'm supposed to say to fit in. Yeah. And they say that high T guys and strong guys are not agreeable. But no, no, no, no, no. It's sort of true. But let me tell you this. I was talking to some friends a while ago about how men interact. And I say, we play video games, right? We're playing Division. Remember Division and Division 2? Fun game. I don't know what they're doing anymore. I haven't played that in years. But me and the homies, we're playing it.

And there's no fighting over being king or anything like that. It's literally like, what are you guys thinking? We're going to do this run. We're going to go to Lincoln Center in this mission. And this is what we're going to do. And any one of our friends who was like, they would basically say, hey, we're going to go in. You go left. Tim, you use these weapons to go after these guys. We'll stand back here. There's no arguments. You got it.

We like, they would do these raids. It's a fun game, by the way. I had, I had his problems, but it was basically like one person would just assume charge and nobody questioned it. We didn't look at each other. Like, how dare you boss me around? One guy would be like, Hey, I've done this a million times. Go left. I'll go right. You use the M one. I'll use this. We bet you got it. It's like, Hey Tim, switch to this weapon because we need someone up top. Like, yep, we just work together. And it's because we trust each other. And, and,

I find it fascinating. Like when men organize and are strong, it's not a question of, I should be in charge. I'm better than you. That's actually weakness. A strong guy doesn't, he like, this is the thing about the military. They take orders, but you're going to tell me that these veterans are all weak. Well, no, no, no, no. These guys in combat know why they trust their chain of command. I'm not saying everybody's perfect. You do have weak guys. You do have ego problems and you do have brain damage and all that stuff. But I'm saying in general,

Guys know that we are working together. I'm not trying to disparage women. I'm just saying like when guys organize. So what I see with these UFC fighters, they know what's right. They know what's true. And it's not about falling in line or being disagreeable or rejecting things. It's about knowing what's true and standing for what's true. That's why I like UFC. Guys who get punched in the face for a living. Strong as steel. Dana White joining the head of Metta. I'm all for it.

So let's see some good stuff finally happen. How about that? Now, what I'm really excited for moving forward is that with Donald Trump in government and cash and many other people, I know a lot of these people. I want to see Trump bring these other countries to heel. I want to see that. I don't want war.

I don't want U.S. military intervention. We just need strength with economic strength, diplomatic strength. And Trump's going to say to these countries, it's real simple, baby. Look what Trump just did to Trudeau. He says, I'm going to tear up your country. And the dude resigns. I love it. Now you got this grooming scandal in the UK, which has been going on for decades, and they covered it up to protect multiculturalism.

I think Trump should put tariffs and sanctions on the UK until all those people covered it up are in jail or at least removed from power, whatever. Bring these corrupt nations to heel.

Let's bring back strength, free expression. I'm all for it. Smash that like button, my friends. Become a member over at TimCast.com. We had an uncensored show talking about the grooming scandal in the UK, and it's fairly brutal stuff, man. Some of this stuff, I think I'm going to do a segment about it, but you can't even talk about some of these things because they're so horrifying and graphic. And it's not a question of YouTube censorship. No, it's a question of

We don't want kids to hear these things, man. It's rough. It's brutal stuff. It's very, very brutal stuff. And I am livid. But we've known about it. Thanks to the likes of people like Tommy Robinson. And he gets to fame. He gets imprisoned when he tries calling this out. Join us at TimCast.com. Stick around. More segments to come. Next one's at noon. And we'll see you all then.

He's been very critical of mass migration and the conflict between the cultures being imported to the UK and to the culture of the UK. For this, he has found himself imprisoned more than once and tortured more than once. A few months ago, we interviewed Tommy Robinson via Zoom or some video link on the culture war. And we told him, Tommy, if you go back to the UK, they're going to put you in prison. And he said he knew he knew.

The story that's emerged over the past week is one of the most shocking and terrifying stories I've ever heard. It is so extreme that, in fact, I can't even read some of what The Telegraph is reporting. Now, The Telegraph is a prominent newspaper in the UK, one of the most prominent. And they ran a story how the grooming gang scandal was covered up.

The child victims of rape were denied justice and protection from the state to preserve the image of a successful multicultural society. My friends, multiculturalism is a fake thing. It doesn't exist. It doesn't work. It's a lie. Now, what they were saying 10 years ago was trying to conflate the great American melting pot with this idea they called multiculturalism.

Multiculturalism is not the melting pot, quite different in fact. What the left was arguing for was parallel cultures existing side by side, which is an impossibility. If one country believes that free speech is a crime and another believes that free speech is a right, well then how do you reconcile these two cultures? They certainly can't coexist, can they? They'll eventually begin fighting.

The individuals who believe that free speech should be silenced will use force against those who engage in free speech. And then there are many other practices. I went to Sweden. This is now going on seven or almost eight years ago, almost eight years ago. And while the narrative was certainly that migrants and refugees were engaging in mass crimes, certainly that was true to a degree, but it was greatly exaggerated.

What was actually happening in Sweden was that the children of Somali refugees from the 90s were, for a long time, disassociating themselves from the traditional Swedish government, viewing themselves as stateless individuals. As it was explained to me, many of these individuals were called immigrants despite being born in Sweden. The Swedish government and many individuals in Sweden called them immigrants. But they had no other country to call home.

This created this tension where Somali children of Somali refugees born in Sweden felt like they were disassociated from the government. Now, the reason I bring this up is that is certainly a problem. When you do not effectively assimilate immigrants and refugees you bring into your country, you create enclaves. But a new problem emerged in Sweden.

And this shows the clash of cultures. There's a practice in Afghanistan where young boys surround other young boys and do unspeakable horrors to them, which I'm sorry, but we know we try to keep this somewhat family friendly, despite the fact that the matter being not quite. But I won't go into graphic detail. You can imagine what they do when they grab these little boys and put them on the ground. And this had begun happening in Sweden.

And the government was lying about it. They lied about a lot of it. Now, I will be the first to admit much of the claims of mass crime were exaggerated in Malma, the city, one of the cities in question. They saw a 1300 percent increase in murders year over year. And to the average person, that sounds shocking and horrifying because we base that off of, I don't know, 800 deaths in Chicago. But the reality was it was from one murder to 13. Now, don't get me wrong. That's still massive.

A city of 300,000 people seeing an increase that much freaked people out. They didn't have murder. And it was largely due to gang violence, not from native born Swedes. Some were born in Sweden, as I mentioned, Somali migrants. Some were Afghan and Syrian refugees. So crime did go up.

It wasn't the apocalypse. It went up quite a bit, but it was largely gang violence that didn't affect the native-born Swedes. Still, nobody wants to live that way. With so many options, why choose Arizona State University? For me, the only online option was ASU because of the quality. Their faculty was really involved with their students and care about your personal journey.

The dedication to my personal development from my professors, that's been extremely valuable to me. Earn your degree from the nation's most innovative university. Online. That's a degree better. Explore more than 300 undergraduate, graduate, and certificate programs at asuonline.asu.edu. So the reason I say this is there was a modicum, a component of truth to the claims. Although many people exaggerated the severity, it was really bad. Grenade attacks, etc.

And then I met a police officer who explained to me, a former police officer, that this practice that exists in Afghanistan had begun in Sweden. Young native Swedish children were being surrounded, boys, by other boys from Afghanistan, pinned down, and you can just assume the rest. Roving bands of orphaned children roaming the streets in some of these cities, looting and robbing people. My friends.

Multiculturalism is and always has been a lie. And now we get the story of the grooming gangs scandal. Now we've known about this from some time. And I think for many of us, we didn't know the true details. The story for a while was that these grooming gangs, which I don't think they should be, I think they should be called rape and torture gangs. The issue is the name grooming gangs and the people who used that phrase.

The assumption was these were individuals that were trafficking minors. And it's horrifying, right? But that they were going to young girls and then grooming them, right? Persuading them, pulling them into trafficking and sex work through drugs and manipulation. It's an atrocity. Don't get me wrong. The reason I phrase it as such is because what was actually happening was substantially worse. As The Telegraph reports, these young minor girls were actually kidnapped by force and

subjected to horrifying torture to physically alter their bodies as they fought back, while multiple men engaged in atrocities against children, some as young as 11 or 12. Now, here's where the story gets particularly terrifying. When the fathers of these young British girls found out that these children were being kidnapped and physically tortured, and when I say altered, it's so horrifying, I can't describe it.

Men using instruments to alter the bodies of children so that they can engage in these atrocities while the children scream and cry and beg. And when some of these children threatened to go to the police, when some of these children would threaten to call for help, they would be doused in petrol. And then these men, gasoline, would say the next time they would light them up and to keep their mouths shut. Now, to go back to what I was saying, when these fathers heard about what was going on,

and finally figured out what was happening to their daughters. In many instances, they called the police and the police outright told them, you will be arrested for being a bigot if you don't shut up. What do you do when this is happening to your daughter? Now, I will say the UK is a conquered nation because these police officers allowed this to continue all to cover up and to pretend that their multicultural society was working.

In another instance, fathers actually tracked down the men who were torturing, kidnapping and raping little girls. And when these fathers called the police saying they've located the building, the police arrested the fathers, even issuing a statement privately to the government and to news outlets when they began reporting on this, that if they actually put this news out, it could cause race riots and racial tensions. You don't be a racist, do you? So what does it bring us now?

I believe Donald Trump, when he comes in, needs to take an iron fist to the UK, whatever form that could be. Sanctions, perhaps. I believe maybe tariffs. Now, the UK is not super dependent on this. Tariffs may not be all that substantial, but sanctions could be. Restricting the ability of the UK to purchase oil on the international market.

locking them out of the swift payment system, doing whatever need to be done so that every police officer, every MP, every everyone involved in the cover up of what is one of the most horrifying crimes against humanity, every one of them ends up in prison. I think it's wishful thinking. I know that many others would be advocating for much harsher actions against the UK.

All I can say is Trump must use 100 percent of his political might to bring the UK, the United Kingdom, to heel. The country has fallen. It has been conquered. The idea that these men and I'm sorry there, I cannot read this story. You're going to have to look it up for yourself because it is so graphic. I do not want to risk a child or a teenager even coming across this and hearing it from me. It exists on the Internet. The Telegraph has the story.

It is so shocking and horrifying, the torture of these children, the systematic cover-up of the ongoing decades of torture against these children, that it is one of the most horrifying crimes against humanity that I've ever heard of in my life. I don't know what else to say. Let me read a little bit.

Here we go. I'm going to telegraph. Safeguarding Minister Jess Phillips' decision to block a public inquiry into the Oldham grooming gang seems from the outside to be almost inexplicable. Children were raped and abused by gangs of men while the authorities failed to protect them. No, the authorities actually protected the rapists and torturers.

A review of the abuse in Oldham was released in 2022, but its terms of reference only stretched from 2011 to 14. Survivors in the town said they wanted a government-led inquiry to cover a longer period and catch what the previous review had missed. In Jess Phillips' letter to council, revealed by GB News, she said she understood the strength of the feeling in the town, but thought it best for another local review to take place.

This is a scandal that should be rooted out entirely and investigated by the full might of the British state. Voices ranging from Elon Musk to Kemi Badenoch have joined the calls for an inquiry. Yet the government seems curiously reluctant to dig into the failings of officials. The reluctance is not new. Across the country in towns and cities, on our streets, and in the state institutions designed to protect the most vulnerable members of our society, authorities deliberately turned a blind eye

to the horrific abuse of largely white children by gangs of men predominantly of Pakistani heritage. Over time, details have come to light about abuse in Rotherham and Telford, in Rockdale, and in dozens of other places. But with the stories released in dribs and drabs and details so horrific as to be almost unreadable, the scale of the scandal has still to reach the public. We talked about this on the members-only show on TimCast last night.

Because, again, you know, when it comes to Tim Kast IRL and even this show, there are many who tell me that they'll be driving in their car and they'll play the podcast and they have children with them. They're kids, they're teenagers, and they don't want them to hear certain things. It is rough, but I think they're right. I think there's a time and place for people of sound mind and mental fortitude to understand the depravity of the world and what evil truly exists. So I'll respect that.

For this show and TimCast IRL, I try to keep it somewhat in line with what the news used to be. That is, at 5 p.m., you'd turn on the local news, and you knew that if your kids were walking around and they heard some of this stuff, it wouldn't be too shocking and too nerve-wracking, too traumatizing. The information contained in this report from The Telegraph is so shocking and traumatizing, I fear that someone who is not old enough to understand...

could be severely traumatized and damaged by the information. Suffice it to say, as I stated earlier, I will put it this way. These men weren't just kidnapping and raping these children. They were using physical instruments to alter their bodies. I can't even, it's so, Telegraph is not wrong. Some of these things are unreadable. Some of you may actually throw up in your mouths or actually just you might rush, you might throw up when you hear what these men had been doing to children.

And then you learn the police protected them. Why? For the narrative. Multiculturalism. That's the narrative they want to push. That you can import deranged, abusive, third world views into a country like the UK. And it would be okay. Now don't get me wrong. There are many people who come from countries like Pakistan, India, China, wherever. Nigeria, South Africa, Eritrea. And these people seek a better life.

They come to the United States and they assimilate. And what does that mean? It means they recognize why our culture and society has grown so great. They recognize that our way of life is better, more peaceful, brings about more luxury, and it protects the youth. And they say, we want that for our children. But there are other people who don't feel that way. They don't know. They don't care. They will rape, cheat, steal, and kill. And when they do, the Democrat types in this country and the liberal types in the U.K.,

Protect them. Recently in Congress, a bill was introduced. I believe it was Nancy Mace that would deport any illegal immigrant that was accused of a sex crime. I believe it was 156 Democrats voted against it. Let me see if I can pull this up. I believe it was 156. Yep. Wow. This one's really interesting. I'm sorry. It was 150. It was 158. Whoa. Has this happened more than once? This is interesting. Let me see if...

Let me pull up this story here. We can pull it up. Here we go. Because this has happened more than once. Elon Musk backed bill to deport illegal immigrants convicted of sex crimes to get to House vote. 158 Democrats voted against the bill in September. How? Here we go. From Newsweek. Full list of 158 Democrats who voted against sex crime ban on immigrants. These people will protect the most vile and psychotic evil imaginable.

When I was younger, I didn't believe evil existed, for real. You know, I grew up Catholic, and I heard stories, and as I got older, living in a liberal, secular place, the conversation I had with people was largely that there's no real evil, there's just interests. And some worldviews are believing in one way and some in the other, but there's no real evil, it's just competing interests that some people don't like. And I was like, really? But I was young and naive.

And then probably around the time I was 18 and actually started paying more attention to news and politics, I started to realize, oh boy, does evil exist? And I feel like evil are actions that damage and destroy life and humanity. So chaos and discord and self-serve. And I believe goodness are things that bring us towards organization, order, success, growth, life, et cetera. I think Democrats are evil. I look at this and

That's evil. None of it makes sense. The House is poised to vote next week on a bill that would mandate the deportation of illegal immigrants who are found guilty of sex crimes. The legislation saw enthusiastic support from Elon Musk. The Violence Against Women by Illegal Aliens Act was first introduced by Rep. Nancy Mace last year and passed the House with bipartisan support. All Republican lawmakers voted for the bill, along with 51 House Democrats. Because it was not taken up by the formerly Democrat-controlled Senate, however, Mace introduced the bill again on Friday.

Let's get it passed through both chambers of Congress this go-round. Why would any Democrat argue that an illegal immigrant who committed a sex crime should be allowed to stay in this country? Because they're evil. I'm sorry, that's just it. Now, I'm not so naive, okay? Perhaps there's something in the bill that's a poison pill and these things exist in Congress all the time. But I'm sorry.

When you take a look at what's going on in the UK, this liberal worldview that stretches all across the Commonwealth nations, including the United States, which is not a Commonwealth nation, but shares a history. This worldview is that of protecting the most evil and vile people. And for what reason? I think it's because they want to destroy us.

I think that many of these liberals and leftists, they hate this country. They hate the crown. They hate Britain. They hate Canada. They hate Australia. They hate New Zealand. They hate everything that the UK is and was, and they want to destroy it. I mean, nothing else really makes sense. Why would you allow for decades men to torture, rape and abuse small girls? Why? Because they're evil.

The United States shouldn't stand for this. You know, I'm a fairly anti-intervention person, but I'm not opposed to diplomacy and sanctions and trade restrictions, etc. I know some of my friends are much more isolationist and say we shouldn't be engaging in sanctions because that just leads to war anyway. But there has to be a means to resolve conflict. And how could we have a strong ally in the UK if this is what their government was doing? We can't. We can't allow it. Same thing is true of China.

and other Arabic nations, Middle Eastern countries that abuse women and children. The U.S. has the absolute power, or I should say, the U.S. absolutely has the power, not that it's absolute, but that they have the, of course, they have the ability to apply massive pressure to the U.K. and bring them to heel. Otherwise, how do you justify these kinds of relationships? Same is true for China with the Uyghur Muslim torture.

And of course, you have atrocities happening in the Middle East and slave labor. How is the U.S. justifying not using its political pressure to force these practices to stop? This is a nightmare scenario. What was happening in the UK? And because of people like Tommy Robinson, we know about it. Not the only one. There's a there's a viral interview that went around where he's called Islamophobic. And it's fascinating. Tommy's not wrong. What are what are his positions? He said Muslims are allowed to join him.

The only issue he has is with the 7th century barbaric practices, not the religion itself. Although you can argue that the religion does need a reform. I'll leave you with this. We can separate the grooming gang stuff and we should say the UK must be brought to heel. But I want to add one thing for YouTube and all of the censors. And, you know, it needs to be said. The Hadith, religious text in Islam, has a passage which was

utilized by Hamas, which was included in the Hamas charter that states the end will not come. Judgment will not come until they kill all of the Jews and the rocks and the trees will scream that there is a Jew hiding behind them. Now, I got a question for the YouTube censors. They'll probably censor me over this, which what am I supposed to say here? Is it hate speech to claim that that religion, that passage is evil and wrong and should be rejected by everybody and anybody who practices or follows that is a bad person?

Is that wrong? Certainly that would fall under their hate speech guidelines. But the passage itself is calling for killing Jews. You tell me how you reconcile that, you scumbag censors. So I think Tommy's been doing great work. They lie about him. They smear him. They call him far right. When his only criticism is that some cultural practices do not mesh with English common law.

Okay, criticize the guy. I'm not going to, I don't know his life history or anything like that. What I can tell you is when I've talked to him, what I've seen him fight for, it's not far right at all. And what do you get when you ignore it? Quote, the child victims of rape were denied justice and protection from the state to preserve the image of a successful multicultural society. Enough. Sorry, man, this one was brutal, but it had to be done. And I know I'm late to the party. This story was happening last week, but it needs to be talked about more.

And I'm hoping that when Trump gets in office, he brings down a boot on the UK over this and we see some reforms. I'm not super confident, but I hope. I'll leave it there. Smash the like button. Share the show with everyone you know. Become a member at TimCast.com to support our work. And we'll keep covering these things and calling them out. Thank you all so much for hanging out. Next segment is coming up shortly.

Top men are sitting behind the scenes saying, damn it, man, find me what caused this so we can make 50 billion dollars overnight. OK, and you clicked the video. So you know what it's about. For those listening on the audio podcast, teens breasts grew to triple G cup size following covid vaccination concerns not adequately addressed. I'm not going to bury the lead. I'll tell you exactly what the story claims. There is a report.

study that tracks this woman whose breasts started to grow rapidly after getting the vaccine and then rapidly more after her second dose. Now, maybe it's a coincidence, but it really does seem like it correlates. There have actually been other reports that women who got vaccinated saw their breasts begin to grow, probably an extremely rare side effect. But the point of the story is

There are scientists and researchers saying if we can figure out how an injection made breasts grow, you would eliminate the breast implant plastic surgery industry overnight. And women would just get whatever medication this was that made the boobs grow. Now, that being said, it's possible it's unrelated, but I will stress it really does, according to this story, appear unrelated.

that it was the vaccine that caused the breast growth. Let me read you this story. And I don't know, I'm sure YouTube will get mad about it. I do have to blur the images because they straight up show this woman's mass. They're saying she developed gigantomastia, it's called. So apparently she had like a B cup, got the vaccine, her boobs started to grow rapidly, got a second dose, and they just massively grew very, very quickly.

When they removed some of the tissue, they actually took a cross section to examine how this could have happened. And it's a wild story. But, you know, bringing you only the most important news. And again, I'll stress there are a lot of people who are a lot of women have reported this. I just don't think enough stories emerged in this reporting that it actually gained traction. Like it's a rare side effect, I guess. But here's the story.

from AOL, carrying New York Post. A 19-year-old woman's breast stunningly grew from a B cup to a triple G in six months following her Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination.

In what researchers are calling a first of its kind case, the unidentified healthy young woman reportedly started experiencing the rapid growth one week after getting vaccinated in September 2022, and it worsened after a second dose. Quote, the patient believed the vaccine caused her breast growth. However, her concerns were not adequately addressed by her primary care physicians, leading to mistrust in the health care system. Toronto-based researchers wrote last month in the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Journal.

They're going to say the study, the study authors pointed to so-called Pfizer boob job phenomenon. Some women claimed their breasts grew after getting the shot, but there's no evidence that was the case. The researchers report that while lymph node swelling is a known side effect of COVID-19 vaccination, changes to the structure or density of breast tissue are exceedingly rare. What is that? Exceedingly rare. That means they know it's a side effect.

The study author said there's only been one published case detailing distinctive breast changes after the Pfizer booster, and it was a noticeable lump. This woman did not have a lump. The woman was found to have a very rare condition in which a benign lesion called a PASH causes extreme breast enlargement. Fewer than 20 cases have ever been documented. This case is the first to demonstrate a temporal association between the PASH-associated gigantomastia and a vaccine. The Post reached out to Pfizer for comment.

The woman reported feeling a tingling in her breasts before they grew. Doctors didn't notice hormonal changes in her blood work and prescribed her steroids and antibiotics to no avail.

Her breasts stopped growing after six months and she underwent reduction surgery five months later, according to the case report. She lost a lot of blood during the procedure, which limited the amount of breast tissue surgeons could remove. She has double D breasts and may get another reduction to return to her normal size. So let me get more into this. Apparently, she's a B cup.

She gets the vaccine and then feels a tingling sensation, followed by about a week later, her breasts begin growing. When she told her doctors, they said, doesn't seem like this is anything. You're clear for a second dose of the vaccine, which she got and worsened her gigantomastia. I know it's a silly story, but I don't know. I think it's worth reporting anyway.

The Toronto study authors are calling for further research to see if there's a link between the COVID-19 vaccine, PASH, and rapid breast growth. I wonder why. More than 13.6 billion COVID-19 doses have been administered worldwide since 2020. A small portion of those immunized were harmed by the shots, while medical professionals saying the benefits still outweigh the risks. But let's talk about that there vaccine and where we're currently at. It's a pretty wild story.

And one of the one of the theories, I guess, during the mass vaccination, during lockdowns and mass vaccination, was that it was effectively the largest experiment ever conducted in the world. Now, let's slow down, slow down. Let's break down this vaccine stuff. There's a lot of conspiracy theories. There's a lot of medical mumbo jumbo. Look, Ben, I don't know.

I'm not a doctor. Talk to your doctor about what's right for you. And if you don't trust your doctor, get a second opinion. That's always been allowed. I've been saying it the whole time. YouTube has never taken down my video for this stuff. Although they did take down our Joe Rogan, Alex Jones episode over some nonsense. We mentioned a story once again, said, yeah, but talk to your doctor. And it was like passive background scuttlebutt. These people are scumbags. But in all the videos I've made talking about it, they've never taken it down. And so I'll say this.

You know, in the early days, people were saying that there's going to be mass death. People are going to die. All these things are going to happen. And I'm just like, no, I don't believe it, dude. Come on, man. Like these grand scale things never happened. It would destroy the global order. Like the global social order would collapse if we saw like 50 million people or 100 million people die. Some people are actually claiming that this would drop the population to 500 million. I don't believe it.

Some are saying we're still in it and it's going to increase death over a long period of time. I don't believe any of it. I'll tell you what I think. I think we had a lab leak, which is not they're not saying it's true. Panic, desperate try attempt to cover up from people like Fauci and a mad rush to vaccinate against what we didn't know, like COVID. We didn't know what was going to do.

Think about it. They're making these bioweapons in labs, one leaks, and they're probably like, this could be the end of the world. So they rush out a vaccine. And I don't think I don't think, you know, as a story stated, yeah, there are people who are injured by it. This woman, this chick's breasts got massive. And I think the issue is with 13.6 billion doses. Figure out whatever the margin of a side effect is. It might be like one in 300,000. And then you're going to see that level of side effects.

But to go back to the main point I was saying, that a lot of us were saying it was like the largest experiment ever conducted. It's because you have a new technology, mRNA, being given to basically everybody, 13.6 billion doses. That's more than there are people because a lot of people got more than one.

There is going to be a tremendous amount of medical data generated from this. That is, I am not saying the intention of vaccination was to experiment on people. I'm saying that amount of data functions as a de facto experiment where they're now going to be able to look at all of this data loaded into AI, have it map the patterns and figure out who was affected by what and why.

Then you add all the DNA data they got from like 21andMe or whatever these companies are that they sold or shared. I'm not saying they sell or share. I'm saying DNA data has been collected by a lot of people, a lot of organizations. And they're going to put this into an AI and they're going to track medical, like, yo, they're going to do it. Now onto the boob thing. Yo, they are going to load up the data on this and they're going to try and figure out the mechanism by which it caused massive breast growth.

Because I got to tell you, if you got all these women that want to get boob jobs, and if they said they can give you an injection that'll make your breasts double in size, yo, they're going to sell those things like hotcakes. Women are going to be lining up, and some men, yeah, are going to be lining up to get those injections. There is probably $100 billion to be made off of all of this. The thing that really concerns me, you know, I know it's a silly story here. We're talking about boobs. But, um,

The AI DNA medical data collection is going to be revolutionary for better or for worse. I'll tell you this. Come up with all the reasons. Tell me why you think it's bad in the comments. Honest, honest, honestly, tell me what you think the risks are, because I'm going to tell you what I think the benefits are. A doctor looks at an X-ray, right?

You go to the doctor, you say, I'm feeling weird. I do an MRI scan. I do an x-ray. They say, nothing seems out of the question. We don't know what to tell you. Your blood levels, everything are fine. You know, glucose, blood pressure, everything's good. And then a week later, you drop dead. Aneurysm. That actually happened to a guy, I think it was in Canada. He said he wasn't feeling well. He felt really off. He went to the hospital and they said, triage, we're not going to bring you in. Drop dead of an aneurysm like that night. Crazy. They could have saved him. Now imagine what happens if we plug all this into AI.

The A.I. can analyze billions of medical records. It's going to know, hey, when glucose is at this level, blood pressure is at this level, assault electrolytes are at this level. It's going to look at that and say 79 percent chance of aneurysm. And doctors are going to go. We can't see anything from this. It all looks normal to us. But in that specific combination.

Not only that, genetic factors. The AI is going to be like, this person's genetics indicate they've got an 83% chance in one week of this happening. You're going to go to a doctor. You're going to get an AI scan, and they're going to be like, let's say you have a genetic disorder. The AI could be like, this pill, a combination of various minerals, will counteract this disorder. It will create new medicines. AI medicine is going to be absolutely crazy.

Now, I'll tell you where it gets dangerous. They can manipulate your brain. They can do things to you. They can make, they can AI create a substance that's undetectable that will cause you to die and only you. They will be able to AI generate based on your medical information, something that went like a gas is released in a room causes you to have an aneurysm and nobody else because the AI can see every minute, minute detail in the patterns that make up you.

That's how crazy this is going to be. As for Pfizer, well, I'll put it this way. Maybe they'll get in the boob job business and they'll figure this one out. I'm going to leave it there. Smash the like button. Share the show with everyone. You know, we got more segments coming up. Stick around and we'll see you all shortly. In an epic speech, Donald Trump has announced we will change the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America. And why not? We deserve it, right? After all,

We've got, I think, more land surrounding the Gulf than Mexico does. And why shouldn't we rename it?

This is MAGA Energy 100%. It's one of those things that's seemingly arbitrary and kind of dumb, but it's epic at the exact same time. While that's currently going on, there's talks about annexing Canada, buying Greenland, and I am all for it, except for the Canada thing. Canada, I'm sorry, guys. But see, the problem is if we try to liberate all of the good Canadians, we're going to get too many of the bad Canadians. You guys can keep your sovereignty. We don't want to have nothing to do with that.

Maybe if Pierre Polyev ends up winning, you know, or gaining more political power there. That guy seems fantastic. I don't know a lot about Canada. But this is mega energy. And the liberal, the corporate press is losing their minds. But this is hilarious. Who cares what we call it? The Gulf of Mexico, the Gulf of America. It's silly.

But it's mega energy, right? I'm actually more concerned about the offshore drilling bans from Joe Biden, the active sabotage of our country by the Biden administration trying to burn it all down before Trump gets into office. These are petulant children who can't accept they lost. You know, I read that it's the first time in 52 years that a Democrat did not challenge the results of Republican victory.

I don't know if that's true. I do know that they basically cry every time a Republican wins, whatever. And now they're going to see. We honored the peaceful transition of power with Trump. And I'm like, yeah, dude, Biden is sabotaging this country on the way out. Trump's going to have what they're trying to do is bog him down so that when he gets into office, half the time is going to be spent trying to fix the mistakes and the problems of the Biden administration. Well, here we go.

From the independent, Trump wants to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico to something more American. Now, I wonder why they don't just run the headline. Because the Daily Beast did the same thing. Donald Trump promises to rename Gulf of Mexico in bonkers rant. The president-elect would rather see the body of water be named the Gulf of America, apparently. You know, let me just tell you. The liberals in this country, they are unified only by hating you.

Who cares? It is funny and silly. I'll play the video for you. But why would they be mad about this? You're taking away a date from Mexico. So what? Jeez.

Well, let me play the video for you, my friends. Before we do, head over to castbrew.com and buy Cast Brew Coffee. Cast Brew Coffee is the best coffee, the most delicious coffee. Everyone agrees, at least that's what I've been told. I actually do think it's the best coffee. Appalachian Nights is the best. But you know, Ian's Graphene Dream has been selling like hotcakes. This is nuts.

Yo, Ian sold 5,350 bags of coffee in like a month. And then we restocked it just the beginning of this month. And he's already, I think he's already sold like 2,000 bags. I guess we got a new hit with this Ian's graphene dream. Yo, dude, Ian's coffee is going to take him to the sky. All right. Well, let's go back to the news. Also become a member at Timcast.com. We need your support.

As a member, you get access to our Discord server because organizing is how we change the world. The Founding Fathers organized a revolution in bars and pubs. We're building cast brew franchises. A lot of interest. Expect to see locations popping up all over the place. And in the meantime, we have a digital space, the Discord server at TimCast.com, where you can hang out with other people and share those ideas. Here we go, ladies and gentlemen. Donald Trump floats. He floats. He straight up says, let's do it. Here's the clip.

Mexico is really in trouble, a lot of trouble, very dangerous place. And we're going to be announcing a future date pretty soon. We're going to change because we do most of the work there and it's ours. We're going to be changing sort of the opposite of Biden, where he's closing everything up, essentially getting rid of 50 to 60 trillion dollars worth of assets. We're going to be changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico to Mexico.

the Gulf of America, which has a beautiful ring that covers a lot of territory. The Gulf of America, what a beautiful name. And it's appropriate. It's appropriate. And Mexico has to stop allowing millions of people to pour into our country. They can stop them.

And we're going to put very serious tariffs on Mexico and Canada because Canada, they come through Canada, too. And the drugs that are coming through are at record numbers. I love this. The Gulf of America. Sorry, Daily Beast calls it bonkers. Trump wants to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico to Gulf of America. He revealed in a bonkers news conference. The announcement comes at a very public rift between the president elect and Mexico's leadership. What are they mad about?

It's all fake, ladies and gentlemen. It's just nonsense. All right. Here's the real news. Biden bans new oil and gas drilling off most U.S. coasts as Trump vows to unban it immediately. Why is he doing this?

You know, Landman is a really great show. You ever see it? It's a new show. It's got Billy Bob, who is fantastic. I don't know. Is he a liberal guy? I don't know. But Taylor Sheridan's got a new show. He makes great shows, despite the weird, what do they call it, Hick Lib stuff that's in it. Landman's still a good show. And it's about a landman, a guy who basically runs oil operations in Texas. And they make some really important points about oil. They got this scene where all these executives are sitting in a room talking about oil

green energy and and then John Hamm's characters is like the public's made up their mind. The news has made up their mind. They hate us. They're going to fight against us. And then they're going to beg us for oil every single day. We don't make oil. He's like, we don't use the oil. We're drillers. We drill for oil. What people do with oil is their business. It's a really it's a really great show. And they make these points. OK, so.

So many of these well-to-do liberals live at the epitome of luxury because of the oil that they get. And then they cry. We should have green energy. I love the scene in Landman where they see these wind turbines and this female lawyer character is like green energy, you know, is encroaching on oil. And he goes, no, oil companies use alternative energy to pump oil. And she's like, what?

And then he basically explains that these wind turbines that you see out in the fields, they're there because there's no other way to get electricity to the pumps. They didn't set up wind turbines because they want green energy. They set up a means of generating energy so they can pump oil and get a better return on their energy investment.

He then goes on to mention the amount of oil required to ship these things out, make the wind turbines, lubricate the dang things. It's like 800 barrels of oil a year to lubricate a wind turbine. Nuts.

But it allows the generation of energy in the middle of nowhere without the requirement for transmission lines. He then mentions in the show, if they wanted to go all electric, you ain't going to do it for 30 years. We don't got the transmission lines. Look at what happened to California. California is like, we're going to go green by 2030. No gas cars. Now they're having rolling brownouts because the grid can't handle it. By all means, build the infrastructure. But for the time being, y'all are begging for oil.

So Joe Biden banning oil is going to do one thing. It's going to cause massive economic damage. I'll explain it again. I explained it before Keystone and I was talking. We had a contractor over here, not a very political person, kind of liberal leaning, and was asking, like, how can Trump lower the prices? And I said, well, he's going to he's going to deregulate the energy sector.

So you get these liberals and they're like, you can't bring the prices down. Trump can't do it. Blah, blah, blah. Let me tell you what Joe Biden did, how he put a knife in the back of the American people. He banned Keystone. OK, he shut. He banned fracking on public lands and all the hippy dippy environmentalists start screaming and cheering like we did it. All right. Let me tell you what this means. Markets are complicated. OK, it is not so simple to say that a man approaches saying I have me here some oil who'd like to buy it and then everyone bids on it.

because there's futures, there's index trading. So what ends up happening? It's not even about futures, index stock, whatever. Let's put it this way. You've got an oil company that says we've got 100 barrels of oil right now. Who wants some? Everybody bids and the price sits around 80 bucks a barrel, which seems to be a happy medium, right? And that way your gas is cheap, but there's a profit for the oil companies. They can fund more exploration and keep pumping that oil. Well,

The people who are buying the oil say, I don't just need one barrel. I need 10 years at a set price. Let's negotiate. Famously, back in the day, I used to work for American Airlines and Southwest was crushing it in the 2000s. As the story went, it's been a long time. So and I heard this passively, right?

Southwest negotiated a gas deal, a fuel deal at a higher rate, but a longer guarantee. It was something like they said, well, we'll give you 80 bucks a barrel.

for 15 years, which is $10 more. And the oil company was like, that sounds great to us. Then when there was a shortage, they were contractually obligated to give them $80 a barrel when gas jumped to $144. So the oil company was losing, but Southwest was able to keep their prices way down because they paid a premium on top. Here's what ends up happening. Biden bans new oil. Let me tell you what that means simply.

So five companies go to oil company. Oil company says I get five barrels a year. I'm oversimplifying the numbers. Each oil company says I'll buy a barrel of oil from you. The oil company is then selling the oil when all of a sudden the news breaks that Biden's banning new oil.

These customers run full speed to the oil company and say, are you going to have oil next year? We're looking at 3% growth. I need 1.3 barrels next year. The oil company says, we're not sure. They just banned offshore exploration, which we were relying on to expand our supply. The companies then say, I'm going to pay you a premium to guarantee my spot. Price goes up.

There's not going to be enough oil. So the other companies then start competing and not trying to trying to outbid each other. And what ends up happening? Fuel jumps three bucks. You're getting five bucks a gallon. When Joe Biden shut down Keystone.

The markets then reacted, saying supply will not meet demand unless we have fracking and Keystone. And you can cry all day and say, but this is bad for the environment. I don't care. The fact remains that if these businesses, these supermarkets, these food producers want the fuel to grow and ship the food and you want your cheap gas and your cheeseburgers, this is how it works.

When Biden shuts this stuff down, the other companies say, I will pay a premium to guarantee the supply I need for expansion, and then I'm going to pass the cost off onto the customers. Not everybody is going to get what they need. And that means when two companies compete, there's two barrels available. They each need 1.3 barrels. What happens?

One company says, I need 1.3, but that's going to cut down the competitors to 0.7. He says, no, that's going to crush our company. I need to at least maintain a barrel. The price skyrockets as both companies compete. Stagnation, inflation, and a higher cost on the consumer because he's shutting down supply. Holy crap. Biden is doing this on purpose to shock the system and cause Trump grief when he gets into office.

Scumbag. The ripple effect of this is going to hit the next few weeks. Trump's going to get into office. Prices are going to go up and they're going to blame Trump. Now, it's a dick move, but Trump can reverse it. He's going to deregulate this stuff and prices will come down. But this is a scumbag play by Joe Biden or whoever it is. So you get it. Donald Trump wants to rename the Gulf of Mexico. It's silly. Why are you pretending to be mad? This is the stuff that's knifing the American worker in the back.

Sorry, we need oil. You want to build new infrastructure? Please do it. I'm a fan. Let's get nuclear energy. How about that? Oh, you're going to cry about that too? Joe Biden has been sabotaging us, okay? I hope Trump succeeds. But that's the real play. I'll wrap it up there. Next segment's coming up very soon on this channel. Smash that like button. Share the show with everybody you know. Buy Cass Brew Coffee. Go to timcast.com. Click join us.

Go to TimCast.com and click Drill Baby Drill. We actually don't have a Drill Baby Drill button, but click Join Us, become a member, and support our efforts to call out the scumbaggery. Thanks for hanging out. We'll see you on the next segment.

A massive new video game dropped last month, Marvel's Rivals. It's kind of like a team shoot-em-up, but it's third person. So if you've ever played a game, it's kind of like Fortnite, but not really. It's more like Overwatch with Marvel characters. And as someone who's played Overwatch 1 and 2, played it since the beginning, Marvel Rivals is very similar to Overwatch. Now,

Now, for those that don't play video games at all, let me tell you why this story's hilarious. Somebody made a modification to Marvel Rivals that turns Captain America's head into Donald Trump. That's right. You can play as this kind of strange-looking Donald Trump face. Kind of looks like his face is melted. In the game. But Nexus Mods, a platform that hosts modifications to various games, banned it. It came back, and they banned it again. Apparently...

When you're playing by yourself at home, they don't want you to be able to play as Donald Trump. Well, that's too bad. That's too bad. The woke left won't let us play as Donald Trump, Captain America.

I'm half kidding about that. Calm down, Wokies. Here's the story. This one's absolutely hilarious. And then I have this post from Steam where people are like, the game is too racist. Because I'm like, I guarantee you, if you type in thing is racist, you will find something. Because whiny little babies don't know what the internet is. We got this from Nat Park Place. A Donald Trump Captain America mod resurfaces on Nexus mods for Marvel rivals before being banned again.

This morning, the previously banned Donald Trump Captain America mod for Marvel rivals reappeared on Nexus mods. However, as of this writing, it has been banned yet again, marking Trump's second removal from the. This is so hilarious. Originally created by Reddit Echo Chamber, the controversial mod was briefly reuploaded on the morning of January 6th, 2025 by a user named ZS Shred Shred.

However, the mod's availability was short-lived as Nexus mods quickly acted to enforce its longstanding policy against politically themed content. That's so weak. This marks the latest chapter in the saga of political mods for Marvel rivals. The Trump mod had previously been banned alongside a Joe Biden Captain America mod. Hey, now that's way better if you ask me because it's ironically funny.

both of which violated Nexus Mod's guidelines aimed at maintaining neutrality and preventing divisive content. While the Biden mod has not resurfaced, the Trump mod's brief return has reignited debates within the modding community about free expression and content moderation.

Nexus Mods introduced its ban on U.S. political mods in 2020, citing the need to curb inflammatory content and low effort uploads that distract from the platform's focus on enhancing game experiences and escapism. Despite the policy, politically themed mods like this one slip through all the time. Now, look, I can understand that they may be like the political meme stuff means the site gets flooded with 10,000 really low effort mods.

Where it's like, you know, Captain America is now carrying American flag or they're carrying a sign saying no step on snack or something like this. Fine. But there's probably tons of low effort mods and let people filter that stuff out. Create a filter that if you think it's low effort, create the low effort section. I don't see why you can't allow people to have this. Just put it in a different section. They're going to say, of course, when anything gains popularity the way rivals has, people inevitably attempt to politicize it.

Though recently we've seen left-leaning gamers make demands that go beyond simple mods that players can turn on and off. They want their ideology inserted directly into the game by developers so that everyone will have to experience what they want to see. Cringe. As pointed out by YouTuber Endymion, in a recent video, some Rivals players are requesting identity politics and pride ideology inserted into the game. With one user going so far as to demand there be gender-swapped versions of each character model. Ha ha ha!

So as not to offend anyone who doesn't feel comfortable playing Doctor Strange as a man. That would just be entirely different characters. Sure. These are all likely the same people clutching their pearls about political mods. We've also seen this before in games like Helldivers 2 where players are demanding capes in the style of ideologically driven flags that break the immersion and escapism of the experience. If you want to make a female Iron Man, how about this? You know what they could do? And I'd be for this. Um...

You want a female Hulk? She-Hulk. You want a female Iron Man? Rescue. It's possible to do. If you really wanted to make the gender-swapped characters, you'd literally just introduce the existing characters of the same archetype from the comics. Jane Foster as Thor. A lot of people cringe at that. So maybe you wouldn't want Thor. Maybe it should have been... Well, I don't know how you'd really do it, to be completely honest. You have to invent new characters for some of these people.

Like what's like the Luna Snow character? I love her story, by the way. Do you guys play Marvel Rebels? Her story is that she's a K-pop artist and she was attacked. Like her concert was attacked and she was defending her fans when like I could be totally wrong about this. But she got pushed into a cold fusion reactor, which gave her ice powers. And I'm just like, cold fusion is not literally cold. It's just room temperature. So no ice powers. But, you know, fine, whatever.

They're going to mention Marvel Rivals was developed by NetEase Games, launched in December of '24 as a free-to-play team-based PvP shooter featuring a roster of Marvel superheroes and villains. The game has quickly gained popularity, boasting over 10 million players in its first 72 hours. I am one of them. Its success has fostered a vibrant modding community. Are you against political mods? Comment below. Well, you can comment below on here. But I'll tell you this. I'm a big fan of Overwatch. You know what I like about Overwatch is that they're good games.

It's not really difficult to get into. Obviously, if you want to be the best, you've got to figure out the characters you like to play. But it's easy to feel powerful in that game. That's what they did really well. And it's kind of fascinating that with Marvel's rivals and with Overwatch, you can feel like you're doing a really good job, even if you're not that great of a character. Sometimes it just feels like you're overpowered.

And so with the man, the Punisher is a lot of fun in, uh, in Marvel rivals. I like the Punisher. Um, uh, who else is pretty good? Uh, I like a Wanda, uh, uh, uh, Scarlet Witch, but it's because she's easy to play. Like if you're going to start the game, Moira in Overwatch or Scarlet Witch, absolutely like the easiest players to get into because, um,

The basic attack for Scarlet Witch and Moira is just aim it in the general direction and you siphon off their life. It's very easy to play. And so I'm a big fan. I think Marvel Rivals is pretty dang good. But of course, no matter what you do, people's going to complain. So I punched in the Google search. Marvel Rivals is racist. And sure enough, welcome to the Internet, people.

You've got this from Steam. Marvel Rivals has a problem with racism and toxic behavior. Now, it's just a community post, 48 comments. I have played several games now. Many ranked matches, but also quick matches initially. The quick matches were extremely toxic and racist, which has now largely shifted to ranked matches. There is barely a game without toxic or racist comments.

Whether it's about someone's possible origin, people not playing anymore because they're against something or whatever else, almost daily you get death wishes or are told to kill yourself. I'm surprised that NetEase Games hasn't done anything about it yet or very little. And I'm even more surprised that something like this is still being marketed through Steam. And someone responded quite succinctly.

This has nothing to do with the game. It has it has it is to do with humans. I'm sorry that a poor experience and it's a hard thing to police. If the game's voice chat is baked into the replay as well as a game chat, you can report them after the fact. I never play with voice chat on. And it's not just because it's stupid and it's a bunch of 15 year olds being like, I'm going to screw your mom. Well, my username is Tim D. Poole.

So like when I'm playing Marvel Rivals, it's very easy to like to see my character profile and all that stuff. And I don't want to go on and play and have people talk about me. However, it is really funny when I play a lot of these games and people just spam thumbs up, even if I don't do well. But that's why I largely just ignore the voice chat. They're going to say as a free to play game, even if their account is banned, there is little stopping them from creating a new account. I hope you have better experiences in the future. It's true.

One person said, as I previously stated, it's not a games problem. Be sure to report anyone who abuses voice chat, blah, blah, blah. Dude, I can only tell you, welcome to the internet. Cry. What are you going to do about it? Go outside into the real world and some random guy is going to scream about some nonsense you don't like.

I was walking down the street in Chicago with a friend of mine who was a lesbian. This is like 20 years ago. Seriously, like 20 years ago. And this guy started screaming at her that she was going to burn in hell because she had, what did she had? She had like a rainbow tattoo or something.

Now, I'll tell you this, my friends. Okay? I can criticize all the wokeness, the slippery slope, the weird stuff they're going after kids. But I'm fine with people minding their own business. So my friend, minding her own business, walking down the street with a rainbow tattoo and some guy decides to interrupt our conversation, starts screaming how she's evil, how she's going to burn and she deserves all these horrible things. I told him to shut the... Get out of my face. And nobody asked you. None of us was bothering anybody else. Okay? Okay?

But my point is this. I'm not going to cry about it. I'm not going to go to the cops and be like, you speak mean to me. This is the problem that I have with where we've gone. Because 20 years ago, I walked down the street with a friend and someone says something mean. We say, piss off, scumbag. And we keep walking. And now you got these kids that they're like, somebody was mean to me on the Internet. It's like, yeah, and they're going to continue to be. And that's the reality of it.

You're going to go on voice chat and they're going to try to elicit emotion to affect your gameplay. Turn the voice chat off. Go into a team game. Find friends. Isolate yourself. Do what you need to do. But you're not going to police the public and tell people they can't talk. Look, when you're out and you're playing a video game, I say out, but when you're like sitting home, you're playing this video game. They want to get you riled up. They want to get you angry. It affects gameplay. It's not going to change. So cry more about it.

If you're on a team ranked game and you're talking to your team and they're saying awful things, welcome to the Internet. What more do you want for the rest of us? If we want to put Donald Trump or Joe Biden's face to be to be honest, if I was playing, I would put Joe Biden's head on Captain America. Actually, I'd put Joe Biden's head on Wanda because it's creepier. I'm kidding.

But let us do the things we want to do. Calm down. Grow up, man. More importantly, kids shouldn't be on the internet anyway. I'm going to wrap it up there. Smash that like button. Share the show with everyone you know. Become a member over at TimCast.com to support our work. Calling out the nonsense. And we will see you all tonight. YouTube.com slash TimCast IRL. The live show. In what can only be described as based, Donald Trump was asked, would he rule out military or economic coercion?

for the U.S. to use in gaining control of the Panama Canal and Greenland. And Trump said no. But this is not me cheering for the idea that the U.S. is going to invade Panama or Greenland. It's Donald Trump roasting the reporters who keep trying to ask military and what would normally be classified or closed negotiation. They keep trying to get him to talk about what he's going to do for U.S. interests that require privacy.

Let's put it like this. If the U.S. goes to Greenland to negotiate them joining as a territory or even a state, who knows? Probably the territory. Trump's going to have to make offers and go back and forth. And Denmark's already pissed saying Greenland's not for sale. So why would Trump publicly announce his plans? He's not going to say anything.

He got asked a question about a preemptive strike on Iran, and it was hilarious. I don't know if I've been pulled up, but he's like, someone said, you talked about previously whether or not, you know, you would launch a preemptive strike on Iranian nuclear facilities. And Trump says, I'm not answering your question. The reporter goes, it's a legitimate question. He goes, yeah, and only a stupid person would answer it. Based. Look, Trump should use the powers at his disposal to get favorable deals for the United States. We are the United States. We built these things. And I don't get it.

Over the past 30 years, we gave it all away. Now, Greenland, how do we come to have Greenland a part of U.S. interest, like a part of the U.S. territorial structure? Through a good deal. The people of Greenland can be asked if they want it, we buy it.

I'm telling you this right now. I don't know what Denmark's offering up to people at Greenland, but I'm pretty sure the U.S. can do better. And Greenland has got natural gas. It's got oil reserves that are untapped and could be developed. Plus, it's got military strategic importance.

Now, maybe Denmark doesn't want to give up one of its territories. It's fine. The U.S. will apply economic pressure and just say, how about this? We foot too much of the bill for you in Europe, okay? How about we cut off all the benefits we are giving you? Then they're going to change their tune. If you want free stuff from the United States, we say no more.

So here we go. Now, of course, the Daily Mail is saying Trump is not ruling out invading. I love that. What is their lead story? Trump hints at invading the Panama Canal and Greenland, says he wants to rename the Gulf of Mexico.

Well, we know the Gulf of Mexico story. It was a it was a hilarious press conference. But Trump is not going to invade Greenland. That's so stupid right now. I think Don Jr. and Charlie Kirk may have gone there. I think I saw some reporting. They're going to Greenland to talk to people. Hey, the U.S. can offer up the people of Greenland awesome stuff. Now, of course, there's more to Greenland than just the people who live there. There's a sovereignty of the land. And that is currently under the dominion of Denmark.

So the U.S. is going to have to negotiate. But of course, Denmark saying no way. Greenland belongs to the Greenlanders, says Danish PM as Donald Trump Jr. arrives. Greenland made it clear that it is not for sale. Greenland did it?

Oh, Danish prime minister did. You see, the people of Greenland have been cheering on Trump Jr. They're happy that we're showing interest because there's tremendous development that can happen in green. Look at this. Is that really a photo of the Trump jet landing in Greenland? That's amazing. Probably a hard runway to land on all the ice. Trump sends it. You know, Trump Jr. shows up. They go to the people of Greenland and say, how about this? And I'm for this.

If Greenland becomes territory of the United States, I am for investment in it. I am for investment into Alaska.

What I'm not for is investment to Ukraine, which is not a part of this country, which gives us nothing. Not interested. Europe, NATO, all these people who aren't footing the bill. If Greenland comes under the umbrella of the United States as a territory, I'm totally for investing in it. I'm for giving money to the states. I'm not for overspending. I think we got to balance the budget. All of those things secure our borders. But I like it.

I like the idea that Greenland has vast resources and is ripe for development and has strategic value. So how about we go for it? Why not? So it's not Greenland saying no. It is Minister Matt Fredrickson on Tuesday.

Saying there's been a lot saying Greenlandic Prime Minister Mute again has been very, very clear that there's a lot of support among the people of Greenland, that Greenland is not for sale and will not be in the future either. Well, that's funny because Greenland called for independence recently, like only a few days ago, maybe because they want to entertain the idea that they should be allowed to negotiate when an offer arises.

The nation leader's remarks come after Trump suggested purchasing Greenland from Denmark last month, calling U.S. acquisition of the Arctic territory an absolute necessity. He also made the proposal in 2019 during his first term, which drew a rebuke from Fredrickson. And he posted a meme photo of a Trump Tower in Greenland.

Don Jr. landed in Greenland on Tuesday and what he called a private visit. But his entourage included firebrand conservative activist Charlie Kirk. There it is. And the elder Trump's personnel director, Sergio Gore. Trump senior described them as his reps. Don Jr. and my reps landing in Greenland. The reception has been great. They in the free world need safety, security, strength and peace. This is a deal that must happen. Mega make Greenland great again.

Oh, yeah. Make make M.G.G.A. McGa. Trump wrote in a Tuesday post on a social media platform five years after slapping down Trump's Arctic aspirations. Fredrickson reiterated once once more that Greenland belongs to Greenlanders. On one hand, I am pleased regarding the rise in American interest in Greenland. He's in an interview. But of course, it is important that it takes place in a way where it's the Greenlanders decision what their future holds. Sounds to me like Greenland may want to hop on board.

Greenland, the world's largest island with a population of around 60,000, was a Danish colony until it became self-ruling with its own parliament in 1979. It remains a territory of Denmark, with Copenhagen exercising control over its foreign and defense policy. As global powers seek to expand their reach and footprint in the Arctic, mineral-rich Greenland, which hosts a U.S. military base, is coveted for strategic value in security and trade.

That's right, my friends. And so when asked, let me play this clip for you. I think it's actually hilarious. Thank you. I wanted to touch on

Very hard to hear. So what can you assure the world that as you try to get control of these areas, you are not going to use military or economic coercion? So he says, can you assure that if you're trying to gain control of these territories, you're not going to use military or economic coercion? Can you tell us a little bit about what your plan is?

Are you going to negotiate a new treaty? Are you going to ask the Canadians to hold the vote? What is the strategy? I can't assure you. You're talking about Panama and Greenland. No, I can't assure you on either of those two. But I can say this. We need them for economic security. The Panama Canal was built for our military. I'm not going to commit to that now. It might be that you'll have to do something. Whoa. The Panama Canal is vital.

He's not wrong.

of the Carter legacy. Bad deal. He was a good man. Look, he was a good man. I knew him a little bit, and he was a very fine person, but that was a big mistake. Giving the Panama Canal to Panama was a very big mistake. We lost 38,000 people. It cost us the equivalent of a trillion dollars, maybe more than that. Probably the most expensive, they say it was the most expensive structure, if we call it a structure, which I guess you can, ever built. And

Giving that away was a horrible thing. And I believe that's why Jimmy Carter lost. He does say you might have to do something. So it's fair to say that he is hinting at invading Panama and Greenland. Yeah, it's not going to happen. But of course, Trump has to say this because he's not going to give up his negotiating position. I would not be for that. There should be no invasion of Greenland or Panama. And I don't think it's going to happen because that's silly and ridiculous. But Donald Trump's going to say, listen.

We built this. Jimmy Carter should not have given it up. And we want control of this structure, as he calls it. I think that's fair. And I think the U.S. is going to have to acquire it through economic means. There's going to have to be a trade deal. What does Panama get in exchange for U.S. control over the canal? And that canal gives us massive, massive international trade power.

If you want to maintain this American system, if you want to avoid war, then you need strength, peace through strength. Greenland would be great. That one's going to be straightforward. Trump, I get why he's saying it. It's not going to happen. But to be fair, he did say you may have to do something. So I understand what Daily Mail wrote, hinting at the possibility of invading Greenland and Panama. Greenland's going to be straightforward. It's going to be a deal. Don Jr. is not flying over there with Charlie Kirk so that they can go up to these people and be like,

Do it or else the military takes it. No, they're going to be like, we want military base here. We want oil exploration. We can pay you. I recommend Landman. I love this show. It's a great show. That's why I keep citing it. And in the opening of the first episode, the cartels got Billy Bob tied up. And they're just basically, his name's Tommy in the show. And they're like, you're trespassing, blah, blah, blah. And then they threaten him. He says, look, we're going to pay you. We're going to stay out of your way. And they're like, you're going to pay us? He's like, yep.

We're going to build roads. We're going to pay you money to use your land to drill for oil. And we're good. And the guy's like basically makes a threat. And he's like, you don't make a threat. He's like, because this is oil we're talking about. U.S. military is going to come on. He's like, he's like, you attack us. And hopefully you make it back to Mexico in time to see a drone blow up your house with your family in it. It's just it's brutal. That's not going to happen.

They're going to go to Greenland and they're going to say, you're going to get paid, baby, because in the end, the cartel says, deal, we get paid. Now, there's a whole lot more to the story than that. But that's the gist. We're going to send in our reps. They're going to go to Greenland and they're going to get a deal and it's going to be a good deal for everybody. Same thing is true with Panama. They're going to go to Panama and they're going to say, we give so much money to all these countries. We have to get something in return. Now, the liberals are going to argue is that Trump strong arming nations and causing problems. B.S.,

The U.S. provides military aid and humanitarian aid to all of these countries. And what do we get in return? Nothing. So how about we say we're going to give aid and you've got to give back? I'm totally fine with international trade. I'm not OK with the U.S. giving money away while our own people suffer. But if we're buying something, that's totally different. We'll see how it plays out, though. I'm not going to I'm not going to sit here and pretend it's a good thing that the U.S. is going to get involved in strong arm or invade or any of that stuff that I would not be for. But we'll see.

Smash that like button, my friends. Share the show with everyone you know. Become a member over at TimCast.com. Got another segment coming up for you in a little bit, and we'll see you all then.