Luigi Mangione CHARGED, Suspected CEO Assassin WAS CELEBATE Due To Medical Issue Claims Media
01:47:59 Share

Luigi Mangione, the suspect in the UnitedHealthcare CEO shooting. He's now been charged in Pennsylvania and is being charged with murder in New York. So it looks like they have a strong suspect in this individual. They say that they found a two-page manifesto, I guess you can call it that, that said the parasites had it coming and he apologized for any trauma, but he had to do it.

Here's the big news. It's the incel revolution, just like Rudyard predicted. You know, what if alt history on YouTube? We had him on Timcast a couple of times.

He basically made this video where he got in trouble on YouTube, where he said incels will lead the revolution. I'm paraphrasing dramatically. I don't know exactly how he phrased it, but he basically said that's going to be single, single man with no kids who are going to destabilize and be fighting and society will will will crumble as such.

He's correct. Again, I don't know if I'm getting his exact message correct, but the general idea is when a society has an increasing number of young men who don't have wives or children, you will see social disorder and collapse. It is in the best interest of society that people get married and have babies. And I got a video to exemplify this, I suppose. But I think when you hear the story, as we're getting more background on Luigi Mangione, it starts to line up and make sense.

He's 26. He's wealthy. He's Ivy League. He's, I think they said he was valedictorian. This man should have it all. Unfortunately for him, he had a spinal disorder, which caused him great pain and numbness, creating...

Two interesting circumstances. The first being due to the excruciating pain, he was unable to enjoy normal activities despite keeping himself relatively in good shape. And again, this is all speculation. It's based on Internet reporting and rumor, various stories. We're going to need to get more details, probably hear what he's going to say about this when he begins to speak. And he's only a suspect in the shooting, though it seems likely that he's the guy. Here's a here's a young man.

One person who knew him said that they went on a surfing trip. He suffered an injury to his already bad back, and it took him out for a week. He can't hang out with his friends, and more importantly, he could not be intimate. That's right. This guy that all of these leftists are standing over and being like, oh, we love him, we love him. Well, for whatever he had going for him...

as a fit surfer because of the pain he could not effectively be with a woman. And that's the reporting they're putting out. Now, maybe it's crazy. Maybe it's wrong. But that's what they're saying. So this is not the case of a guy who doesn't think he has what it takes to get with a woman. It's a guy who's physically unable. The pain he's experiencing. Add one more factor to this. It all comes together. He said that he was experiencing increasing numbness and was terrified of what that would mean. Now, we don't know

Again, this is rumors. They're saying they believe they found his rented account. And it may be him saying that with this spinal disorder, the numbness was terrifying him. Perhaps at some point he would become paralyzed. And this creates the perfect radicalization subject. He can't have a family and kids. The pain is too difficult for him to be to be intimate. So no kids with no ties to the future to what children do.

And Bill Maher, other people argue that's not true. It is true. And I'll get more into this. You have a young man who is in extreme pain, who has no family, no no children, nothing to care for, to protect for the future. And now he has a fear that his time may be short. Add all those things together and you get someone with the political ideology saying, what have I got to lose? I don't know. I'm not saying I know for sure.

I'm just saying based off the speculation that we're seeing, and I'll show you the story. We'll break down about this guy. There's another video where this guy is and it's going viral. And it's not much to the story other than a guy bought a car as is from a dealership. As soon as he's driving it off the lot, apparently he realizes it's broken. And they said, you bought it as is. Cry more. And he threatens them. He will he will ram their building unless they take it back. And they say no. So he rams their building.

I am making the bet right now. This dude has no children for the same exact reason. Who would be willing to go to prison for 20 years for something like this? Well,

Someone with nothing to lose and nothing to worry about. And we see this with the far left when they riot in the streets and smash windows and risk going to prison. They don't have anything to worry about. They're thinking to themselves, my worst case scenario is I go to prison. OK, someone with children and a family says, what will become of my family? Even hardened criminals are terrified of being taken away from their children if they have them. So I say this.

Rudyard Lynch. And what if Altistry's prediction about young men who are single leading to instability? I believe he is correct. And this is going to get absolutely wild. So we'll let's jump into the story, my friends. But before we do, we got some good new products over at BooneysHQ.com. Check out BooneysHQ.com. And I'm going to tell you what we got going on. The right to arm bears.

It's a skateboard and they're selling this. They're selling pretty well. People really like this one. And it says the right to arm bears. And there is a bear wearing a hat and a flannel with a shotgun. And you get the point. The right to bear arms, the right to arm bears. Ha ha ha. We're very funny over here, but I love this graphic. And then, of course, we have Johnny Haynes pro model gay frogs.

And you see, this is a celebration of true love between two frogs. And anybody who says otherwise is offensive. It is two frogs deeply in love, drinking some kind of green substance that may or may not be atrazine. And behind them is a rainbow. And they are loving life. And we respect it. And it's so beautiful. You can pick those up at boonieshq.com. But let's read the news from ABC News. Link in the description below.

Luigi Mangione has been charged with a murder in the fatal shooting of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson last week, according to an online court docket. A 26-year-old from Maryland was arrested by police in Altoona, Pennsylvania for gun charges ahead of him being charged by the New York Police Department on Monday. The NYPD also charged Mangione for possession of a loaded firearm, possession of a forged instrument, and criminal possession of a weapon, according to the docket.

The Manhattan DA's office confirmed the charges. So the update here is that New York has now charged the guy. A forged instrument is the fake New Jersey driver's license he allegedly used to check into the hostel on the Upper West Side. Mangione remains in the custody of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections pending his extradition to New York. Now, the speculation from leftists is that this is part of the plan. Interesting. We were wondering, like, how does this dude get caught? He flees. He gets away. He makes it to Altoona, which is...

Not that far away from us. Granted, I mean, it's the East Coast. They're close. It's close to everything, right? He's sitting down in a McDonald's with the backpack, with the manifesto, with the weapon and the fake IDs dressed in the same clothes. What? Well, the left says it was on purpose. That was his plan. He wanted to get caught so that he could expand this conversation. Now, he's a dangerous, psychopathic moron. And I would say this.

Based on what we're reading here in the Daily Mail about his secret, his sex secret, they call it, meaning he couldn't have it. I think we're really seeing is a frustrated and angry young man who blames the world for his suffering because he's developmentally disabled. Now, I know people are saying, but Tim, he is a valedictorian, wealthy, smart, intelligent. No, he isn't. OK,

Assuming this guy is the actual shooter, right? We don't know. He could be someone trying to take credit for it. I got to be honest, his build does not look like the same guy in the first video, but he could have been wearing layers because it was cold. No idea. But a young guy who is willing to go and kill one CEO changes nothing, makes things worse. They're not smart people. Society breaking down is not going to help anyone get health care.

This guy, assuming it was him, and it does seem to be lining up, but we'll see. Writing about Ted Kaczynski, he says that any animal in the wild would recognize the threat and fight to the death. I understand. I'm going to stress this again. This guy, his IQ's got to be like, he's got to be like a midwit. Like, you know, I'm not a big fan of general IQ because anybody who's looked at how those tests work...

It's like you can get a person who's really good at looking at a cube and unfolding it in their mind. And if their spatial reasoning is really high, it can bump up their IQ. And it's like, yes, yes, we understand. But knowing how to solve a Rubik's Cube by sight and just seeing it very, very smart and able to recognize patterns is

But it doesn't mean you have comprehension skills. It doesn't mean you can you can think in multiple layers. So while I do recognize IQ is typically does correlate with ability to compute, comprehend, etc. It's not always that there could be someone who's autistic with a really crazy mathematical and spatial reasoning and their ability to like read and comprehend English is really, really diminished. Right. Rain Man, if it were. I think this guy's probably smart in a lot of ways. Don't get me wrong.

but his inability to calculate properly beyond what he's doing or read. Perhaps a better way to put it is he may actually be really smart. He just didn't read enough. And boy, he's in for a troubled realization. I should get a cold splash of water in the face. I'll put it when he starts to read about the history of the world and what he's doing and what it leads to. That is the idea that this action will improve the lives of anybody is stupid.

Destabilization means less people will get health care and you've made everyone's lives worse. Not to mention two kids now don't have a dad. But what did this guy care? He doesn't have kids either. Here's the story. They say Brian Thompson shooting suspect Lee G. Mangione suffered a back injury so severe he was unable to have sex, a former roommate said. R.J. Martin lived with the murder defendant for six months at a Hawaii co-living space, told the New York Times about his secret agony. He knew that dating and being physically intimate with his back condition wasn't possible.

I remember him telling me that and my heart just breaks explaining the injury that Mangione had suffered after a back condition called spondylolisthesis. There you go. Probably pronouncing it wrong, but hey, I'm not a doctor. It was worsened by a surfing accident. His spine was kind of misaligned. He said his lower vertebrae were almost like a half inch off and I think it pinched a nerve. Anybody who's ever had a pinched nerve knows what it can make you do. And I am not exaggerating.

I had a pinched nerve two years ago. I think you could probably look at the record of my video production and see like there's a gap. I can't remember exactly when I couldn't move at all. It was in my back and I was laying down. Any movement was a 10 out of 10. It's crazy. And I was like, give me all of the drugs. I don't like drugs. I don't like painkillers. I never take them. Um,

And ibuprofen, you know, NSAIDs work really well for me. The opiate-based stuff just does not do anything for me. It makes you feel loopy and high, but the pain is still excruciating. And I guess that was the—is that the idea? That giving people, like, Percocet or whatever is supposed to make them just happy while it hurts? Well, I'm not a fan. Anyway, I had a pinched nerve. I didn't get any medication for it. I just didn't move for three days. Now, this dude's been living with this whole life to the point where it was debilitating.

I tell you, man, the pain will make people do crazy things. They say Martin told CNN that he was described as a bright engineer, suffered from debilitating pain through a six-month stay at surf break. He said a single surf lesson left Mangino in bed for a week, adding it was really traumatic and difficult, you know, when you're in your early 20s and you can't do basic things. Yep.

And so they say that other residents would talk about medical issues in capitalism. But he insisted the suspected murderer never gave up the impression of being angry or radicalized. He also said that Mangione did not complain about his back pain and did not appear to be taking any kind of painkillers. Mangione's health issues are also said to have caused professional problems for the University of Pennsylvania graduate. He was an engineer for an online car sales company, Trucar. A Reddit poster believed to be Mangione spoke of how he had lived with a back condition called spondylolisthesis since childhood. I don't know if I'm pronouncing that right.

It's a bone in the spine that slips. The condition usually affects the lower back and can be very painful. So what slipped disc is that same thing also posted on the same red user was complaints about Lyme disease and severe brain fog. These are said he began to suffer the issues during his fraternity hell week and that his graduates, his grades had subsequently subsequently slipped.

The Reddit user who believed to be him said a surfing accident left him locked up in the back and hips. And he added that intermittent numbness had become constant. And he added, I'm terrified of the implications. That's right. Gradual paralysis. So here's a guy in excruciating pain on pinched nerve, slipped disc, who is fearful that he may become paralyzed at some point, can't be intimate and can't have kids. And we are looking at it not the same way as the incel revolution necessarily, meaning that

The idea of like the incel is a guy who just doesn't understand society. He may be as ugly or for some reason can't be intimate with a woman, but it usually refers to people who are otherwise somewhat abled, as it were. Now, don't get me wrong. There are incels who make the... It means involuntary celibate for those that don't know. There are people who are like wheelchair confined and disabled who are like, you don't understand the pain. Like, I can't do anything about this. This guy...

You look at him and you're like, he's a fiddle. Look at him. He's got abs. Shouldn't he be? Well, if what we're reading is true, we don't know for sure. Just rumors. Debilitating back pain, which again, if you have not pinched a nerve, you don't get it. Okay. You ain't being intimate with nobody when you got a pinched nerve. You are not literally paralyzed. You are pain-based paralyzed. I'll just say this. Upper back pain.

pinched a nerve and sure I could get up, but it felt like, I got to tell you guys,

People like to say like it felt like I was being stabbed. No, no, no, no, no. OK, when depending on the stab, you might not even notice. OK, because it goes between the nerves with a pinched nerve. It is a sharp grasping pain like a demon is is cursing you. I don't like that. That was just like I just you can't move. I'm just sitting there not moving at all. Slamming ibuprofen like crazy. This dude's not going to be with him. So he's got no kids.

It's an excruciating pain. Fear is he's running out of time. Maybe he becomes paralyzed and it all becomes clear, doesn't it? Yeah. Now, I don't know exactly, you know, what this turns into or if it inspires people. I don't know if this is the right guy. I'm just saying based on speculation. But you take a look at the Reddit page.

R slash anarchism. Adam Curtis put it perfectly. I believe the CEO adjuster had no plan to escape long term. He wanted to surrender so that we can engage on this topic further. The guy truly sacrificed his life as he knows it for something greater. No, he sacrificed nothing. The point was he.

Again, the rumors. But based on what we see now, they're saying he sacrificed himself. No, he didn't. He was already condemned. He did nothing brave. He did nothing sacrificial. This is not martyrdom. This is a guy who felt he had nothing left. He was going to burn the world down around him. OK, if this is a dude who was wealthy, famous.

fit, rich, married, had children and said the future, my children's future depends on me making a sacrifice greater than myself. Maybe you can make an argument depending on the action. I still think it would be insane if this guy went off to war, for instance. That's why I like veterans, people with families and with everything to lose, sacrificing for the greater good that I believe in. This guy's a psychopath who had nothing to lose because his life was already in a pile of crap.

So he decided he was not going to lose. Who cares? So he's not sacrificing anything, but they do make a good point. Someone says he planned to get caught. He wanted it to happen to McDonald's so that there were witnesses and he didn't just get executed on the spot, which would likely have happened if he wasn't in a busy public place. If they do decide to shoot him, he dies in McDonald's, an altar of capitalism and becomes a martyr. If he survived, he might get his day in court. That would be a big news day. I agree with that.

That this was his plan. That's why he was in a McDonald's. That's why he had everything on him. He wanted to get caught. He wanted to make the news. And I think the issue was after and we don't know for sure, but I'll say it again. But after the CEO died, it was split speculation. Right. Some were saying, was it a professional hitman? Was it that somebody was mad about his wife cheating on him? Who knows? So this guy says, OK, the message wasn't clear. He had monopoly money. He was going to throw it on the body, but didn't.

He escaped. And so there was no known real motive. He may have thought to himself, damn, people don't realize what this is about and what he wanted them to think. So he intentionally gets caught to make sure the narrative is leftist political ideology.

I said this last night, but I'll stress it again. When we're talking about left and the right, spare me your French Revolution definitions. Stop. Don't be these liberal intellectual types. They're morons. Well, left actually and the right actually. No. In the United States, left and right are used to describe political tribes. Far right describes me a rather liberal ideologically individual who despises the establishment that that's right wing. Whatever. Dude, you're nuts.

This guy is clearly a leftist. Right wingers are not known for going around and planning to destabilize society and kill CEOs. Right wingers are known for preaching, having a family, respecting the police, following hierarchy. That's at least in America. So a guy who is an anti-capitalist,

who is critical of big oil CEOs and angry about climate change, does not typically indicate a right-wing individual. Despite the fact he had praised some of the comments of Tucker Carlson and listen, and Huberman, it does not mean he followed those things. But you can see how stupid these leftists are. They're like,

Wow. He listened to Anthony Huberman, or is it Andrew Huberman? I'm sorry, I'm getting your name wrong, buddy. And Tucker Carlson. Therefore, he is right-wing. It's like, what? We have leftists who watch these videos. They're not right-wing. They hate watch. They might agree with something sometimes. Cenk Uygur came on the show. He's not right-wing. Spare me. But I agree. I want to show you this. Angry customer makes dramatic entrance at car dealership. It's a guy ramming into the front of a dealership, but it's going viral a little bit on X.

Like I mentioned, this guy said, apparently the story is, let me just refresh it. And then Ali London has the story. He posted it. He says the man drove the car through the dealership window after purchasing it the same day in Sandy, Utah and finding it mechanical issues. The dealership had sold the car as is and refused to take it back. So he resorted to smashing through the window in rage. Police said the man threatened to drive through the dealership's front door if they wouldn't give him his money back. And then he did. Okay, well, I doubt he has kids. Any one of you listening, you have kids? Would you do this? Yep, we get it.

Totally get it. You'd say no, because this guy's going to prison. My point is the incel revolution. Not that it's literally a bunch of weird, scraggly guys going and like running out the door. No, that's not what I'm talking about. I don't think that's what Rudyard was talking about either. The point is there are going to be strong young men capable and intelligent, but they have no families.

And so when facing down ideological passions and the risks, they say to themselves, what do I matter? Now, a man with children says there are things I believe in that I believe must change. But I have to be reasonable because if I go to prison, my children will be destroyed. You see?

So maybe this guy has kids. I don't know for sure. There you go. I'm thinking he has no family because it would be rare, in my opinion, particularly less likely that he has children and just threw his life away and made his children starve. He's probably got no kids. And so he's angry. Same thing of this Luigi Mangione guy. You know, it used to be that you were 26. You had a family. And that's why we don't see things like this.

But in today's day and age, I blame largely feminism. Oh, yeah. Bring it on. Feminists cry more about it. Take the clip. Share it far and wide. I literally don't care what you think. The issue is it used to be that we had gender roles in this country and you had women who found social acceptance from being mothers running households. And that was a powerful role to create life, nurture life and literally create the next generation.

Men would go out and do and hunt. Right. It was similar. They'd go to the workplace. The workplace was dominated by dudes. They would make money, bring it back to their wives, and the wives could then utilize those funds to take care of their children, run the household. At some point, there were women who didn't want to or couldn't get married. And so social pressure emerges. I do believe it's a natural phenomenon where these women without men need to have jobs. They need to be able to feed themselves. They're just going to be left out. Right.

And so they were called spinsters. And I'm not saying it to be a dick. That's what happened. What ends up happening is that there is an economic incentive in the long run for businesses and less of a social pressure because we have so many people as it is less of a biological imperative and less of a religious imperative. And thus society starts producing media.

catered to the male power dynamic, the male power fantasy. Early on, it's detective mysteries, it's Superman and these stories. And so women begin consuming social media, which states social acceptance is derived from being the hero and being the hunter. Take a look at where we are now.

For hundreds of thousands of years, women were prideful at having great families because other women, they were looking at other women to what was socially acceptable. And men were looking at men. Men weren't looking at women. Women weren't looking at men. Women would say, oh, that's what men do. Men would say, ah, that's women's work. Well, women were getting offended by it after a long enough period of time. What we have now is women chasing after the masculine gender role and the female gender role is completely eschewed.

So a young man like Luigi Mangione enters a world where he's got, let's just say it's disproportionate to where it used to be. Not impossible. But for someone like him, it used to be that women were looking for families and men were looking for career and families. And so like in the 50s, you'd date in high school, then you'd get married. Not necessarily every single person, but it was very much like this. And the goal was to have several kids in your early 20s. Now, this guy, Luigi Mangione,

Again, assuming it's him, we don't know. 26, no family. That's crazy. Back in the day, he'd have been married by now. He wouldn't have done something like this. He'd be like, I got kids. I got to feed them. I got to go get a job. I got to figure this out.

But now women are pursuing work instead of family. And so instead of competing with instead of men competing with men for jobs, they're competing with women for jobs. Women are getting upset about this. It's changing the dynamic entirely. And I'm not saying I'm not saying it's wrong or right or whatever. I'm telling you, like these this phenomena happens.

Young men end up not being able to find relationships. Dating apps expand the dating pool. Then you have promiscuity and the dating hookup culture. So now you have women acting like men. It used to be that women didn't act like men. They acted like women. And I know the feminists, you can cry and scream all about it, don't care. But this is ultimately what ends up happening. Young men who are listless and well, they have nothing to lose.

We'll see how this goes. I'm gonna wrap it up there. Smash the like button. Share the show with everyone you know. Become a member over at Timcast dot com. Follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast. And we'll see you all the next segment at noon. Appearing on Timcast IRL, Rudyard Lynch, a.k.a. What if alt history on YouTube said that Trump would win the election? We would be entering a period of civil war and there would be one thousand domestic politically motivated deaths by April.

I disagree. I said, that's a little bald. It sounds like it's moving too quickly. And he wanted to say that civil war does not mean, and I totally agree with him on this one. People just don't get it. States lining up against each other and then marching towards each other. He said, no, but it could be like a bomb going off somewhere or something like this. And so you might, you'll see around 1000 dead by April. It's currently December 10th. We are just over one month from the election to April.

I could be wrong. I follow the news every day, but it looks like we have two out of his 1,000 in one month. Fine. A lot of people are arguing he's right. I do believe he is incorrect. I believe it's a little extreme to state this. I think it would have been fair to say that we will see some politically motivated deaths. The big story right now, of course, outside of the CEO assassination, we have this from the Post Millennial. A Georgia woman was killed in a collision with the bomb squad after Marjorie Taylor Greene was swatted.

And now I will I will clarify, of course, this is not like some rogue actor went and killed a woman. This is the bomb squad responding to a terroristic threat, an attempt on Marjorie Taylor Greene's life and an innocent woman being caught in the crossfire, thus getting killed. But I will stress, I do believe this counts. Not that I think Rudyard will be right by April. Hey, maybe I'm wrong. Maybe he's wrong. Who knows?

But this is I would liken it to if there was a crazy person who was attacking people in the street for a political reason and the police and this person got into a shootout and innocent people got hit in the crossfire. We would say that's deaths resulting in political conflict. This was an attempt on Marjorie Taylor Greene's life.

You do not deploy SWAT teams and bomb squads unless you are trying to kill someone. Sorry. Don't know. Don't care. Maybe you're ignorant. You don't realize what's going to happen. Whatever. You saw it on the Internet. The reality is when SWAT teams show up thinking there's going to be a threat, they come with they're ready to shoot to defend themselves and others. And so there was a story a few years ago where a man got swatted over some video game thing online.

And the police pulped in front of his house. He walks out on his front porch. They kill him. Innocent guy. He didn't know what was going on. He was I don't believe he was armed, but the cops saw the guy with no stop, stop. And they had gotten a report of a crazy guy with a gun. Swattings are an attempt on someone's life. A woman was killed essentially in the crossfire of this swatting. That is terrorism. That is murder. But again.

We're going to get to a thousand. A lot of people have responded saying, Tim, we're not even past January 6th yet. April is going to be four months from then. So right now it's the calm period. It's the holidays. And I still say, guys, guys, look, everybody likes a Tim Pool is a Civil War guy. Yeah, because I'm talking about the path that we're on. And I've long let me clarify, because, you know, people like Sam Seder, he asks these questions, but they don't actually hear anything I have to say much the same.

In the 1820s, there was talk of civil war. It didn't happen until 40 years later. So we are on a path for the bifurcation of this country. We are heading in a direction towards what I would believe even now, civil war. In fact, these past two deaths certainly exacerbate any existing tensions. The left, people like Taylor Lawrence, prominently declaring they feel joy and they want more.

Recently, there was a manifesto claiming to be from Luigi Mangione. It appears to be fake, but people are sharing it because it's just capitalizing on the story to radicalize people. And now we have this. I don't know where we go. I don't know if this escalates. I am going to say it right right now. I do not believe a thousand people will die by April. That is nuts.

Because the state of this country would be crazy. But to be fair, it's not impractical. I'm sorry, that's the wrong word. It's not implausible. It is impractical. It's a psychotic thing for anybody to advocate for this stuff. These leftists who advocate for this chaos and destruction don't realize they will not survive the chaos. They live in cities gangs would take over. But imagine the scenario.

Donald Trump is inaugurated on the 6th. There's chaos in the streets of D.C. We saw it in 2017. We're likely going to see it in 2025. And so there's protesters, there's firebombings. That doesn't seem to be out of the question because, again, we saw it the first time Trump got in office.

Let's say that Donald Trump, he's announced a bunch of things. He's going to mass deport. He's going to use the military to do it if he has to. He's going to end birthright citizenship on day one. There are a lot of moves he's planning on making. He's talking about he says the J6 committee should be in jail. He's going to pardon all the J6ers. This is this. There's going to be an equal and opposite reaction from the far left.

AOC in a viral clip saying Daniel Penny is the reason we're not safe. Their ideology is an inversion of the world that regular people live in. I say regular people because Trump won the popular vote. But Trump begins these sweeping changes and reforms. And what do we get by April? Trump now in office for several months, about three months, four months. There's going to be a lot of dramatic changes, a lot of personnel. The media is screaming, oh, no, Tulsi Gabbard's a Russian spy. They're attacking Kash Patel. It could be.

It could be crazy. I don't know. But let's start here. We'll read the story from the Postmillennial about this woman that was killed. This is an attempt on Marjorie Taylor Greene's life, which ended in the death of an innocent woman. So that's two.

Before we get started, my friends, head over to boonieshq.com and you can go to the board section and you can pick up Johnny Haynes pro skateboard model. And what is it? It's two lovingly prideful gay frogs holding each other's hands, drinking a green substance that may or may not be atrazine. I don't know anything about the substance, so they're drinking something green.

And behind them is a beautiful rainbow. And this is a celebration of the Frogs' love. And if you believe that the Frogs deserve love and should not be denigrated by the woke media, then you can go to Booneys HQ and pick up this board. We also have a bunch of favorites. Obviously, Step on Snack and Find Out. Everybody loves that one's back in stock. And the right to arm bears.

I do not believe that bears should be given weapons. It would be terrifying. They're strong enough as it is. But if you believe that bears should be wearing flannel shirts with rolled up sleeves bearing shotguns, then perhaps you could purchase the right to arm bears over at boonieshq.com. That's up to you, though.

All right. Over at the Post Millennial, they say a woman was killed on Monday in an auto accident involving a member of the Rome, Georgia Police Department who was responding to a hoax bomb threat at the home of Marjorie Taylor Greene. Earlier in the day, Greene posted on X, the Rome Police Department's assistant chief of the police received an email containing a bomb threat directed towards me. I'm so grateful to every member of the Rome Police Department for your swift and professional response in ensuring my safety. She posted this video of the bomb squad testing and looking for four bombs.

Green's office said in a statement that the local police department in Rome, Georgia, dispatched its bomb squad to her home to investigate. Green included a video in her post of a member of the bomb squad checking her mailbox for an explosive device. Later in the day, Green revealed the tragedy that unfolded during the police response. She posted on X, I am heartsick right now. Let me pull up the actual statement from Marjorie Taylor Greene.

I am heartsick right now. I was just informed that an innocent woman died today in an auto accident involving a member of the Rome police bomb squad who was responding to the threat at my home. My prayers are with Tammy Pickles, Pickles, Pickles, Zimmer, her family, the officer who was injured in the entire Rome police department. These violent political threats have fatal consequences. It's an undue strain on our law enforcement who must treat them seriously.

The officer was responding to protect my life, and now a woman has lost her life because of this despicable act. The perpetrator of this crime has committed murder in our small community of Rome, Georgia. The police shouldn't have to respond to these threats, and there should not be death threats caused at their hands. I'm so thankful for everything the Rome Police Department does to protect our city and for putting their lives on the line to do it. I'm sick to my stomach, but I'm also angry. This should never have happened, and I pray it never happens again. Two.

This is the second politically motivated death that we've seen. Now, some have said the first this CEO is not is not politically motivated. And that's incorrect. What we understand about the suspect and what we believe as of right now, though, we don't know exactly. And I'm going to stress this again, guys. This guy could be found innocent. Who knows? This could be a leftist trying to take credit for something, trying to rile or radicalize people. We don't know.

But based on what we think, it's politically motivated that there are parasites who have it coming. The attack on CEOs. There's a reason why the left is celebrating this. It is a politically motivated move to go after the power structures of corporations. And these people are insane. Now, I know the manifesto going around is probably fake. There's a so a manifesto was written up and posted online. It's four pages and.

It was posted two hours after this guy was arrested. And now a lot of people are saying that proves it's fake. It doesn't prove it's fake. It would have to imply that someone else was involved and was prepared to publish. Or it could be that this Mangione guy wrote it up and then scheduled it to be published a few hours after he expected to be arrested or was scheduled for whatever reason. No idea.

The manifesto going around basically states that his mom was suffering from neuropathy, debilitating pain, and it was miserable. And the doctors kept saying they couldn't help because the payments were being delayed or denied. And it was unnecessary treatment. And his mom was screaming in agony. I don't believe that it's real. It doesn't continue the quotes the police claimed were in it. I think someone's just trying to radicalize people regardless.

Somebody wrote this up to capture an idea that the insurance companies are evil, that they're siphoning the blood, literally what it says in this fake manifesto, presumably fake, of the people to gorge themselves and become fat. Or it says they become fat off our blood as they extract it. That is the view of the left. It's a psychotic view from people who are developmentally disabled. Because if you as an individual suffer from a debilitating disease, disability, ailment, whatever,

These things happen. Now, short of medical malpractice resulting in that crisis, this is life and you are not entitled to anyone else's labor. If someone can't help you, they don't owe you anything. If you pay for a service that is denied unjustly, that should not be. And that I agree with. The insurance companies do run the circuitous network often to make it very difficult for people to get their claims paid for. But typically the claims are just paid for.

Like, I don't know about any of you. I've never experienced it. And I told the story of how, you know, my insurance was I had a lapse in insurance coverage when I was leaving Vice and going to Fusion. In that week, they charged they tried charging something like I can't remember if it was 40,000 or like 14. It might have been like 16,000. If you watch the video from around the time I had the numbers, but I haven't seen those bills in a decade. And I told him, OK, hey, I'm in between jobs. I'm transferring to a new company. I have insurance. And they dropped the bill to like 4000 or something like this. And I was like, what?

How does that work? But I've never had a circumstance where I've had health insurance gone to a hospital and then they were like denied. Never happened to me. I know it happens to other people. I'm not saying it doesn't happen, but I do believe it is an issue of the scaling problem as I describe it. The overwhelming majority of people don't post. I had great coverage. Most people who go to the doctor and get their treatment paid for don't come out going, hey, they helped me. You go. Woohoo. Go insurance companies only when they complain.

And if everybody in this country has some type of insurance, I mean, let's say 100 million people. Right. As I've described the scaling problem, if one if there's a one percent failure rate for whatever reason, that's a million people saying they're being screwed over and people will assume the machine is broken. I don't tell you. And Navarro and Whoopi Goldberg get into heated exchange in the view about whether or not it's time to panic about Trump.

So this is the question, I suppose. Are we going to see a dramatic escalation in the next few months? Will these people panic saying people are going to be under his attack? Could that result in an escalation of violence? So here's a couple of questions for you guys that you guys can comment below. I'm curious your thoughts. Rudyard said 1000 dead by April. But hold on. What if what if it's 500? Would you say he was wrong?

I actually think it's fair to say that the general view that Rudyard stated is that we expect to see many, many deaths, an exorbitant amount of deaths. Now, he has a bet. He said he bet someone $1,000 there would be 1,000 politically motivated domestic deaths by April. And I think that's I think he's going to lose money because that's that's a silly bet. But in terms of his general view as to what is to come.

If we do see a substantial amount of politically motivated killings, which I hope we do not, and I beg and pray that law enforcement gets a hold of things and that we stop any kind of instability. But in the event that something like that happens, even if it's not a thousand, even if it's 200, does that prove he was generally correct? That's what I'm curious. You guys can comment below. And I know some of you are going to be, no, he said this number. Some of you might be like, we get the point he was trying to make. Here's the view. ...care of ourselves and our families.

Whatever he's going to do, he's going to do. But do take our word for it. Things seem to move slowly because, yeah, they didn't come get Hillary. Gradually and then suddenly, however, I'm going to pause right here. What Eric Prince told me when I asked him about instability in this country, he says the one thing that all of the guy, he's the guy from, you know, like Blackwater back in the day.

One thing all the guys tell him when they work in these countries facing this instability is one day everything seems normal. And then you wake up and there's no electricity. There's no communications. There's no radio. There's no Internet. And there's conflict gradually and then suddenly. But he has other people who are ready to go. But I don't think that they can just go out and do what they want. I told you last week I disagree with you when you say that because.

No, because we have the luxury of saying that because we're legal. We are successful. We are an illegal immigrant in this country. You're not going to be not in a panic. You are a woman working for the Department of Defense. You have a right to panic. You tell people to stay fraught and like this. That is telling people to prepare. Whoopi, they are telling people. Do you think they're not prepared? They are prepared.

are prepared. So that means that they can be relaxing and enjoying Christmas when winter is coming. No, it doesn't mean that. No, it doesn't. You know what? I'm sorry. I mean, I disagree. Winter is here. Winter has been with us. And my point is we can lay down and do nothing for the next 15 days and then be freaking out for the next four or two years. But my point is we are in a privileged position that a lot of people were going to be under. I am a family.

who is going through the same thing. I'm not panicking. We just have to live. We have to figure out what we're panicking for. We don't know what we're panicking for. They're throwing 50,000 things at you to make you do this. I'm saying don't buy into that. Do what you have to do. Take care of your family.

And when we know what is happening, when we know what we're fighting, we'll get out and fight. That's what I'm saying. I'm not saying don't do anything. I'm saying don't be this because nobody can do it. Would you like us to stop?

Don't relax during Christmas. We'll be right back. Don't relax and enjoy Christmas. Winter is coming. People are going to be under attack. Notice what she said. If you're an illegal immigrant, she didn't actually say illegal immigrant, did she? Help people to stay fraught and like this. I'm telling people to prepare, Whoopi. I'm telling people to prepare. Do you think they're not prepared?

They are prepared. So that means that they can be relaxing and enjoying Christmas when winter is coming. I'm sorry. I mean, I disagree. Winter is here. Winter has been with us. And my point is we can lay down and do my point. We are in a privileged position that a lot of people who are going to be under attack are not. I have a family who is going through the same thing. I'm not panicking. We just have to live. We have to figure out what to do.

Where did you say that? I told you last week I disagree with you when you say that. Because of the luxury of saying that. Legal. Because we're legal. We are successful. Listen. She did say illegal immigrant. We got her, boys. That's the wrong terminology. You are canceled. Anyway, I wanted to make sure. Sorry about that. I think it was important to go back and make sure to see what she was saying.

If you're an illegal immigrant, you're not supposed to be here. You have broken the law and the penalty is not to harm you, but to give you a ride home. If you broke into my house and the worst that happened to you was I escorted you to the door, got a cab and drove you home. Holy crap. Talk about being a nice guy. But think about where this is headed. What they're basically saying is if you're an illegal immigrant, you have a right to be here. And it sounds like what they're suggesting is you should be prepared for some kind of fight.

I find that kind of worrying, actually. Imagine what this turns into. You know, I don't know. Again, I don't know. And so maybe it's nothing. But perhaps in Rudyard's world, what he's describing with politically motivated deaths could easily be related to the deportation of illegal immigrants. They're saying that Trump wants to deport U.S. citizens. Well, he wouldn't deport U.S. citizens. But if there is a mother here,

and a father, and they have a three-year-old who was born here. That three-year-old is an American citizen for being born here, but the parents are not, and they're illegal. Well, the baby's got to go with them. We're not going to keep the baby, are we? No, the parents get deported, and they have the choice to bring their child back with them. Trump says he's going to sign an executive order on day one ending birthright citizenship. That's huge.

We may see the left rally illegal immigrants, this wave of individuals who came to this country illegally, and they're going to tell them at the state level with governance behind them, you have a right to be here. You live here. You are residents. And that's going to be the central theme of the conflict. I fear that Rudyard may actually be correct. And what we could be looking at is in the event of any escalating civil conflict, imagine what the narrative becomes.

In the 1800s, before the 1800s, it's slavery. Slavery was wrong. Basically, people were considered property that I wouldn't describe it as them having rights, though there are some scholars who describe certain. No, not really. They were considered property. They had no rights. They were under control. But what a lot of these leftists don't tell you is that Frederick Douglass, for instance, famously bought his wife out of slavery. There were ways to do it. It wasn't all slavery.

You know, they like to in a lot of these movies, you see slaves as being beaten in the fields and things like this. And while that was massive and a serious problem and like one of the principal problems, there were circumstances where there were slaves who worked in like in a shoe store and they did other jobs, too. All of it was bad. Don't get me wrong. The left is going to try and argue that I'm downplaying it. No, no. I'm trying to just show you the bigger picture.

The reason I'm stating this is this is why back in the day they thought they were justified doing it, because look how good we can make their lives. They get a place to live. And that was somehow justification for taking someone's rights away. What they would argue now is that there should be no barriers of citizenship. We are all global citizens and the people who come here have every right to vote because they're human beings all the same.

They will try to reframe it as there was a period where a portion of the American people. That's right there. What do they what do they call them? They said undocumented citizens.

That's what the left has been saying. Undocumented citizens. They are reframing the argument so they can say there was a class of people who lived in this country, who worked here. Some were even born here, came here at a young age, and they did the jobs we needed. But they were second class and weren't given rights. And it was Donald Trump and the conservatives. If the left wins the political battle in this regards, whatever it turns into.

They will give legal status to every non-citizen and create a system by which anybody can walk through the gate and get all rights to taxes and labor, whatever they want. And the system would collapse. It's an insane system. But I'm wondering if that is what ultimately could lead to a greater conflict. And I'm wondering who wins. I don't know. But all I can say for now is Rudyard 2. It's horrifying. And I hope it doesn't get worse unless I'm missing anybody.

Comment below. I'll leave it there. Smash the like button. Share the show with everyone you know. Become a member at TimCast.com. Stick around. We got more segments coming up and we'll see you all shortly.

Instantly, this photo's emergence has exacerbated conspiracy theories of a psy-op where the more the story develops, the less people are believing it. Now look, I'm a fan of Occam's razor. I'm not a big fan of conspiracy theories. In the absence of evidence, the solution that makes the least amount of assumptions tends to be correct.

And in this regard, I got to say there's good reason to doubt this story. That being said, there's not much else to go on. So for all the people that believe this is a psy-op, they're going to be drawing inferences from other stories. They're going to make up a motive in their mind, as many are doing. But that is a tremendous leap. Now, it's fine to say I find issues of this story to be suspect. The story is just breaking. So we don't know what's what.

And it's fine to doubt things. You're allowed to. Personally, I take issue with the people saying the CIA did it. They did it for this reason. We know why. And I'm like, OK, look, look, you know, if someone wants to point out that this photo of Mangione eating at McDonald's makes little to no sense. I'm curious where the photo came from. There are explanations. Fine. But then say that it proves some kind of conspiracy or otherwise seems silly. Now,

Let's I want to I've got this big there's a viral tweet. It's got a thousand retweets, almost 650,000 views breaking down why they feel this is a psyop. And I'm going to show you, but I will. I'm critical of it. I will say this. The things that I will give the naysayers and the doubters in this story is who took this picture of Mangione. It's from like relatively close to him.

I mean, I'm not saying it's like they got up in his face. It looks like it's digitally zoomed in. But this means that someone saw this guy wearing a brown beanie and said, I think he looks like the masked man from that photo that went around, which like makes no sense. Like you see a guy in a black sweater and a brown hoodie and go, that looks like the guy with the black jacket whose face I couldn't see.

So a lot of people are saying, well, that seems weird. Then they pull out their phone, take a picture of him and the police come and get him. The guy is found three days later with a backpack, with a manifesto, with a gun. And the whole thing seems like he intended to get caught. Now, what I will say is when the story first broke and we saw the surveillance footage of the assassination, which went viral.

The individual seems to be a little bit heavier set than this Luigi Mangione guy. In my view, based on the white on the hands, which is from the cold, reduces blood flow, and then you'll get where there's pressure. Of course, you know this. You press into your hand, it turns white because the blood is pushed out of it. See, it's more indicative, in my opinion, of someone who is slightly older, middle-aged, not a young person who's 26, 26 years.

That seems strange to me. But, you know, what do I know? I could be wrong. But when we saw these photos, they said, here's a person of interest in my hospital. We I and many others, a thousand retweets. We all and all the quotes were like, that is not the same person. The reason I highlighted this was because they were the police didn't even say it was a suspect. They said this was a person of interest. And I'm like, from, you know, the somebody who interacted with them and y'all are saying it's the killer. You need to wait.

Well, now this dude's been charged and there are a lot of questions. These new photos have emerged, which has many people questioning, how did anyone see this guy and say that looks like the photo from New York? It doesn't. I look, man, can I?

I don't believe it. I don't know how they caught the guy. I don't know how they noticed it was him. Maybe they saw his ID somehow. There's possibly an explanation. But I do not believe personally that some random people at McDonald's saw that guy and said it looks like the photo from the description. Now, it can't be explained. Don't get me wrong. It could be as simple as...

Everybody is pointing to everybody. You know what I mean? So the police said they were getting tons of tips. And you may be wondering, like, how does someone see that? Well, it could be that police received 300,000 tips from all over the place and were just following up on as many as they could. One of them was Altoona, PA.

They said he's got a backpack. Here's what he's wearing. And they said, we'll check it out because of its decentralization, meaning you get a handful of tips from Altoona and maybe they're wrong. The cops show up and go, yo, this guy's got a gun, a manifesto. This might be him. That actually could explain it. That's why I'm saying I'm not a big fan of the conspiracy theories. It's possible that there were tips in, I don't know, in let's just say

Hagerstown, Maryland. And the cops showed up because they're local cops. They get a call and they have the time. They're not searching New York. They're from Maryland. They find a guy and they say, ah, false alarm. It really is that simple mass decentralization. So who knows? Who knows? But I also do find it weird that the dude shot the guy left.

Did this perfect escape plan, but then kept all of the evidence on him and got caught. I just, you know, again, I'll stress it is believable. But let me do this. Here's a here's a photo that I put that a tweet that I posted December 5th. I said definitely not the same person. The person on the left seems to be slightly heavier set. And with the white on the hands, the hands are red with some white markings. Some have said, Tim, it's just the camera. They're two different cameras. Agreed. I absolutely know how that could that could affect things.

But people are trying to argue it's the same jacket. It's literally not the same jacket. You can tell the hood is stitched differently. It's a different backpack. The guy on the right, apparently Luigi Mangione, has a black backpack. The guy left is a gray backpack. But I could be wrong. It could have been as simple as he brought multiple sets of clothing with him. We honestly don't know. So we will see. But let me break down a bit of the argument that is being made in this viral post as to why this could be a PSYOP. PSYOP.

Now, I don't know why would I got to be honest, 600000 views. I don't know what's the point of entertaining the idea that this is a PSYOP. Like, seriously, you tell me you come up below. Let's break this down. I'm going to I'm going to I'll read through this. But the first question I have for you is, what is the point of this PSYOP? You have to make tremendous assumptions about motive to do so.

So the argument is generally that it's creating a class divide. The class divide was already there. Occupy Wall Street was 10 years ago. The core ideologies of this class divide never went away. So you want the left and the right to be at each other's throats or whatever. They still are. And what's I don't quite understand to create a leftist boogeyman that the right can rally against. So here's what I could give you that's probably plausible. The first thing I'd say is.

What makes the most sense? The left is violent. They are swatting MTG. A woman has died because of this. And a crazy young guy who was radicalized by far leftists killed a CEO. That seems to be the simple solution. I don't know why we would try to make assumptions beyond that. I'm fine with doubting the official narratives because they may not be giving us the full picture. Law enforcement doesn't always do that. And as it pertains to the federal government, they keep things classified.

But the argument is that they're trying to keep the left and the right divided because division allows them to control people and all that stuff. And I'm like, I kind of just think the left does these things and we don't need to manufacture a leftist boogeyman when AOC is calling Daniel Penny dangerous and they tried to lock him up. You know, so here's the here's the post.

It says, I haven't slept. B. Luigi Nicholas Mangione, born 1999 in Maryland. Family is loaded. Doesn't mention Ivy League. Works in a dev club. Graduates in 2020 with a BSMS combo. Dream life. Data engineer. 2021 gets into a surfing accident. Gets low back pain. Can't work out. Goes to the healthcare system, Hellscape. Spends money on specialists and treatments fail. Starts ranting about parasite healthcare executives.

Get into niche books. Crooked, Outwitting the Back Pain Industry, Back Mechanic by Stuart McGill. The Unabombers Manifesto, posts online about banning porn. Follows Erowid, explores psychedelics for self-healing. 2022 goes on ayahuasca retreat. Desperate for relief, looking for answers beyond medicine. Finds God, fights demons, blah, blah, blah. Deletes most of his old tweets. It goes on.

2023 broke, depressed, living off savings, spiraling quietly, becomes a ghost online, posts less. What's left feels curated and too on brand. And then the CEOs assassinated. Luigi, a resident McDonald's in Altoona, Pennsylvania, with 3D printed ghost gun, zero serial numbers, spooky tech vibes, silencer, fake IDs, plural why. Handwritten manifesto. And he says the manifesto is where it gets weird. Call CEOs parasites.

And powerful abusers apologize for any trauma caused. Says it had to happen. Specifically names UnitedHealthcare as the enemy. Blah, blah, blah. Timeline doesn't add up. Last known address was Hawaii. How does he suddenly turn up at NYC?

None of this I find to be all that compelling. Right now, there are two fake manifestos circulating. One was published two hours after his arrest. Maybe he wrote it and he scheduled it for release on Substack or something. Then there's another one from a website that was briefly up and then got deleted. It has been archived and everyone's trying to claim these are real manifestos, despite not containing any of the quotes the police claimed were in the manifesto. So this is very strange. I think there's actually a much easier explanation. The guy

was radicalized because leftists get radicalized. They've done things not too dissimilar. They're cheering for this. Taylor Loren says she feels joy, as do millions of others. The sentiment, the motivation clearly and obviously exists. We know leftists are deranged, violent individuals. Certainly, I don't, I think the guy doesn't look the same on camera, and it's weird. The accounts that seem to be bots and trolls, look,

If anything, in my opinion, would make me feel like this was a sigh up is the people who are telling me I'm wrong in my assessments before anything, any information comes out seems to make no sense. The story drops. They show the photo of this guy and I say, definitely not the same person. And my point was the police weren't looking for a suspect, said person of interest. A person of interest could be an individual who interacted with the murderer. All of a sudden, I get these weird lefty bot accounts. I say bot with air quotes, but they're clearly like they look like sock puppets.

saying, ha ha, you're an idiot, you're wrong and all of these things. And it's like, that's strange because everyone I've talked to in person is like, interesting. Yeah, it doesn't look the same person. I don't know. We'll see. Just like a more calm, reasonable, like, yeah, I guess maybe you're right. The main point was all of these media outlets publishing this photo could have been in trouble and it's not the first time it's happened. So it was actually reasonable, reasonable of me to say, these don't look the same guys. I'm even wearing the same clothes.

Yet these far left pro-violence sock puppet bot looking accounts all of a sudden were in unison aligned. And that's always what makes me feel like that's coordinated. I'm not saying it's the CIA or anything. Anyway, he goes on to say, it's a sigh up. Luigi is the perfect recruit. Ivy League media catnip relatable to both elitist and normies. I disagree. This is all speculation.

By the time the CEO's murder is fully under their control, the demons broke him or the deep state leveraged him. Luigi didn't do it. CIA or Mossad carried out the assassination. The silencer screams pro-job. No, it doesn't. It screams somebody who watched a movie. Like, dude, I, yeah, like, I just, I don't, I don't believe it. Why the PSYOP now? Because right versus left was collapsing. No, it isn't. Trump united Silicon Valley libertarians, populist unions, and VC bros.

The view right now is having an argument over whether or not to panic and not enjoy Christmas. The left versus right isn't going anywhere. It's just that there's a slight majority of people who realize Trump was the better option. The leftists are still trying to figure something out. That being said, the Democratic Party is fractured. Who disagrees about the health care system? Look, you need a left right the psyop to but the left and the right hate the health care system together.

You know what I mean? Like the right certainly isn't cheering on the murder. The left is. But that divide always existed. They riot in the streets and they kill people and they celebrate it while we condemn it. That's not going anywhere. It hasn't changed. We expect them to riot over Daniel Penny. We expect them to riot when Trump is inaugurated. I don't see why they would need this PSYOP, you know.

The guy also goes on to say that someone messaged him saying that right after he was arrested, the account followed Ezra Klein, Leopold, Ash and Eruid. I have no idea if that's true or not. I'm not a big fan of this narrative. I don't necessarily agree.

We have I'm not going to read these manifestos because there's no evidence to just they're real. And it looks like leftists are publishing fake manifestos to radicalize people. This guy, this guy says Luigi Mangione left a manifesto. He was clearly upset with his mother's pain. And then we have do we have it right here? No, that's not that's not it. Where am I looking at? Another one. Health care and its victims by Luigi Mangione. December 3rd. Once again, an archive from a website people claiming is his manifesto. But there's no evidence to suggest it actually is.

This is from a website, Pep Mangione, which is the same as his Twitter account, posted on December 3rd, which was archived on December 9th. After he was already arrested, anybody can write December 3rd on it, and there's no other dates available. So if this was archived on December 3rd, I'd say it was interesting. Likely these are fake manifestos. If there is a PSYOP, in my opinion, it's probably coming from leftists who are saying now is our chance to radicalize people.

They may be saying, Tim, you're playing right into the hands of the PSYOP to create the left right division because they want people hating each other. I'm going to I'm going to pause you right there and say I did not create the left right division. It has long existed. But there is strong unity right now, which is a good sign for all of us in that Trump won the popular vote. Republicans won everything else. The point being that I, as a liberal minded individual with with some, you know, social liberal policy ideas, right.

Fairly libertarian anti-establishment, certainly not woke in any sense of the imagination. Find myself aligned with many more conservatives and libertarians, and thus we voted for Donald Trump. There is still a debate among us on how to handle things like abortion and taxation the way things used to be. We don't want the for for the deep state, for the CIA. It does not make sense that they would they would want this kind of battle.

between a far left and the existing Trump supporting right. It is much easier to control people who don't like violence, don't want violence, and have minor disagreements with each other. If the left, as we know it right now, that is advocating for these things is excised from popular and mainstream culture, what do you get?

The political debates will be me and Ben Shapiro discussing the limits of abortion law calmly with with cigars, whiskey and for me, iced tea. And I'm not smoking, but imagine Michael Knowles and Ben Shapiro, me and Dennis Prager and Jordan Peterson. Who are all the Daily Wire guys? Because Dennis Prager, Simon, who? OK, who else? Viva Frye, Robert Barnes. We sit around puffing on cigars and saying, well, you know, maybe there's got to be some

some policy by which we can effectively adjudicate health care issues without being too restrictive. That's an interesting thought, gentlemen. Shall we have another two fingers of whiskey? That's much easier to control. You want to control the machine. You want stability. You want wealth. You want international intervention. This is the easier path to do it.

What sounds more likely to me is there are fringe leftist Marxist views, maybe in the CIA, perhaps. OK, that could be the reason. Communists who want to destabilize the machine to bring about some ridiculous far left utopia, they want to exacerbate this. That's why we have two fake manifestos. They want to reach people, radicalize them. They're saying, look at this guy. He's hot. They're telling young you got women posting videos saying they want to bang him.

That sounds to me like far leftists and lunatics like Taylor Lorenz want this to be the case because they want communism. OK, maybe then you'll say, see, Tim, the CIA is communist and they're the ones pushing this. OK.

Fine, if that's your argument. I think the deep state machine would prefer the moderate liberal and moderate Republican. Oh, dare I say we must have a slightly smaller tax policy. I think 15 percent is good. No, no. Sixteen percent. We need a little bit more. Sixteen. That's too much. Much easier to control. People are fat and happy, not literally fat. People don't like that. But they're

You know, watching sports games, going to the movies and largely disinterested in violence and conflict. And they handle things in reasonable and measured ways, which is easier to control or at least is more predictable. So you can operate your machine behind the scenes. I think, if anything, it's the far left that is trying to rile people up. But I suppose, my friends, we will just have to wait and see. I'm going to leave it there. Smash the like button. Share the show with everyone, you know, become a member at Timcast dot com. Thanks for hanging out and we will see you on the next segment.

My friends, this video has radicalized me. It's certainly not the first video I've ever seen of such a thing. But in this video posted on X by this large woman reposted by Ian Milestrong, it is a morbidly obese woman. I would actually argue moribundly obese. There is a difference here.

Talking about what she eats in a day as a fatty. Her words, not mine. And to which she gorges herself in a quite alarming manner. And it's radicalized me. I can't in good conscience advocate for government funded health care in any capacity until this is resolved and until current obesity rates are brought way down as one of the principal causes behind health ailments, cancers, heart attacks, etc. Stroke even. How?

How can we as a nation agree that our taxes are going to cover health care in any capacity? I'm talking about even one dollar when you have people who outright say it is not my responsibility to be healthy.

So I don't know how many of you are going to get mad watching this because this one made me particularly angry. Not that this woman is demanding health care personally. But when I see this, I just say outright, we cannot as a society have this extreme obesity and universal health care at the same time. So I don't know if I should play this full thing because I think it's gross. I'm not going to play the audio of it because it's disgusting, but I'll play some of it.

And uh... What I eat in a day as a fatty who works from home and sits on their butt all day. Good morning, we're having cookie quists, nonfat milk, balance.

It is weird that she does like, oh, God, the sounds of her. I can't do it. She does. She she tries to use like nonfat milk. And then she does. Yes. So disgusting. Sugar free. Here she. Oh, holy crap. She poured a fourth cup of flavor syrup. Looks like a what is it? Torino. What is that company called? Sugar free. Red Bull. It's sugar free raspberry and sugar free vanilla. Yes. Except you put all those weird chemicals in it.

And then it's just her eating again. And I honestly think, guys, to be they have that stuff like that mukbang stuff, what it's called, where disgusting people just gorge themselves to death. There was a woman. I think she was in Korea. She was doing a live stream marathon food session and her stomach ruptured and she died. Like, this is not OK. Yep.

Oh, man, this is I can't even I'm not going to play it. I can't do it. Then she's like, got me some little corns to forget the Diet Coke, Diet Coke. And then it's just her gorging herself, dude. I'm sorry. I mean, I could probably play it for shock value, but I'm too disgusted by it to actually do it. And so let me just say, lady, you live the way you want to live. OK, my disgust shouldn't defend you in the least bit.

I wish you the best, but I ain't paying for your health care. Let me say this to all of the angry people on the Internet. I ain't telling her to do anything. She's got to change her life. I wish she would. She hasn't got to stop eating. I'd prefer if she got healthy, but she can live her life. Now, I am entitled to my disgust. I am allowed to say that gluttony is disgusting and this country has a very serious problem with it.

And people who make money posting videos online of them gorging themselves quite literally to death is a bad thing. I reserve the right to be disgusted and to shame these people.

But by all means, you do you, I guess that's the American way. OK, and so what I will add to this is I can I can already hear the whining from these leftists saying things like body positivity and all that. And my response is, why are you why are you offended by my disgust when I say this is one of the most disgusting videos I have ever seen? I struggle to play it because the sounds make me want to vomit. Why would that be offensive to you?

Many people feel many ways about other people. You see, these leftists live in this reality where they want you to enjoy and entertain everything they do.

No, we're allowed to shame you and be grossed out by things. Sorry, I'm not playing this game. When it comes to the gender ideology stuff, you're going to get somebody who's very clearly male and they're going to say, call me by my pronouns. And it's like, dude, OK, live how you want to live. But you cannot force me to feel a certain way. If I am unhappy with your attitude and behaviors towards me and think you are engaging in some kind of negative, I'm allowed to feel that way. It's how I feel. Now, by all means, live your life.

It's called tolerance, not acceptance. I ain't going to accept any of this bad stuff and I will argue against it. But by all means, it's a cultural thing, right?

I'm not going to say that it should be illegal for people to eat too much food. I'm not going to agree with Mike Bloomberg, who was like, we should tax the poor because they buy sodas that are too big. Now, if you want to buy a gallon of a liter of cola and chug it with your supersized burger and a bucket of fries, you go ahead and do so. However, while you are free to do so, do not come to me and tell me I'm not allowed to call you a disgusting slob.

Now, my friends, many of you at home, you may be morbidly obese yourselves or more abundantly obese, which I will draw the distinction. We got a new classification, my friends. Obesity is when people are kind of fat. Yeah, kind of like a little bit. You have morbid obesity where you are actively dying because of your weight. More abundant obesity is when you are on the verge of death. You could die at any moment. OK, and I and I and I am worried about all of you.

We had this Fitcast IRL campaign. We said earlier in the year, all of you must get fit by November, by the election. I tell you this, if any of you out watching this are overweight and have not taken the active measures to improve your life, I implore you to do so. I will tell you how I feel.

Look, I know people who are overweight who don't gorge themselves in this disgusting manner. They eat quite politely. They just don't exercise and they're eating bad things. That's fine. I'm not disgusted by somebody who's just eating. It's the fact that these disgusting people, they're disgusting, in fact, because they're just slamming this and just posting these videos where they're just making the sounds. And I'm just I'm grossed out by it. But that's me.

By all means, comment below. Tell me I'm wrong and you don't care that you think that I'm disgusted. Fine. But I think what this country needs to bring back is shaming people.

OK, shame is not it's weird that it's like, but you're making me feel bad. You should feel bad. We're not shaming you because of an inherent characteristic that I think is silly. If somebody is born with a bum leg or a cleft lip, I'm not going to shame them for that. If someone is morbidly obese and they're in the gym and they're working out, I'm going to clap for them. I'm not going to insult them. I'm going to give a fist bump and say, let's go, buddy. You got this.

But if you're sitting at home saying, I work from home and I'm a fatty and I'm going to gorge myself, what disgusts me? It's not so much about the chewing into the camera, which clearly disgusts a lot of people. It's the lack of willpower. It's the unhealthy lifestyle that is destroying yourself that you're happy about. It is the embodiment of sin, gluttony, pride, sloth, all of these things.

So if you want to do that, by all means, you do that. But I'm going to tell you, I find it to be disgusting. What I love is you see that story of a guy who's 300 pounds and he says, I have decided I will not be this way anymore. Take responsibility. Merit matters. Now, my friends, I asked our good friend over at JetGPT, let's talk about the politics of this. As I make a graph correlating obesity by political affiliation, it couldn't really do it. But it pointed out that there is a nonlinear relationship

correlation, which gives them very little data, which is interesting. Up to a certain point of obesity, people are more likely to support Republicans. So it's like a bell curve on the skinny end. They're more likely to be liberal on the kind of overweight. They're more likely to be Republican. And then on the extreme overweight, they're more likely to be liberal again.

Kind of a weird finding. Chad GPT says it shows there's not a direct correlation between weight and political affiliation. That being said, I said, are people who are overweight more likely to support universal health care? Yes, they are. Studies suggest that people who are overweight or obese may be more likely to support universal health care. The correlation could stem from personal experience with the health care system.

individuals with higher body weights are more often reliant on medical services to address these complications. I asked them to make a graph and it said, well, the specific data is not really there. They do find that, uh, uh,

People who are overweight more are more likely to believe the government should be paying for their health care. That being said, they also claim the majority of people in this country, as of June 2024, 65 percent believe the federal government has a duty to ensure Americans have health coverage. That being said, that question does not say they believe there should be health care.

paid for by the government, but that the government should have some kind of regulation in place to ensure that. That could mean companies can't deny pre-existing conditions or something like this. It's very different from saying that people believe there should be universal health care. But I will tell you this, my friends.

You will never see me vote for universal health care so long as we have morbidly obese people gorging themselves. I will not pay for this. OK, what can you do? Well, if you pop over to Booneys HQ, you can pick up your right to arm bearers skateboard. Skateboarding is a great way to stay in shape, running, exercising, whatever. Shameless plug. But let me tell you, I skate.

Usually about two hours a day, two hours per day, but maybe like three or four times a week. And typically putting my heart rate at VO2 max for over an hour, which is particularly brutal. And I hope I don't die.

But my resting heart rate is in the in the low 40s. So, you know, I've got the heart rate tracker and all of that stuff. My heart rate spikes when I'm doing segments. It like goes up to elevate. It's pretty funny. I'm working out. My watch actually thinks when I'm doing these segments, I'm running. That's probably why I can talk so long. It's for so fast. The blood goes crazy. But I exercise. Exercising makes you smarter, stronger, faster, smarter. Not a joke.

Your your brain fog is gone. Mental acuity sharpens. Improved blood flow is good for your brain and your experiences and your emotions. You will sleep better. You will live better. Your skin will clear up. You will feel better. And so I tell you, the challenge I know for so many people is they have built these routines of eating the garbage for that tastes good and not exercising me. I am not a fan of going on hikes. It's so boring. I'm not a fan of lifting weights. It's so boring.

What I do like is skateboarding and parkour. So for me, I've discovered that the best path towards getting exercise is to just skate. And what I haven't in a long time is the parkour where you're climbing on bars. Climbing is fun. I'll lift the weight of myself. So we want to do this for a while and get a rock climbing wall installed.

That's how you're going to get a good upper body workout and all around workout. I think that's the path for me. It's got to be quantifiable. I have to be working towards a goal. Can I climb to the top of this thing? And parkour is better because there's tricks and different techniques involved. That's really what gets me going. But let me just say, man, I saw this video from Ian Miles Chong. And I'm just thinking like right now, there's this big debate because there's Luigi Mangione guy about health care coverage being denied. And I'm like, yeah, you know what, man? Look,

I do think there should be a degree of basic coverage for like broken bones and we get it through a voucher system or whatever. But man, am I very much just like I don't think. How about this? Here's a happy medium. Universal health care. So long as your heart rate, your BMI and your health is at a certain you're in a certain condition. And I mean it. And they're going to say that's not fair. What about people who are disabled in wheelchairs? Yeah. Sorry. Too bad. Like.

Listen, basic health care means we can cover little things that are cheap if you're healthy. There's not a lot to worry about. There's no expense there. But if you have a rare cancer, genetic disorder or otherwise, that's a very expensive treatment and it's got to be paid for by someone. You have no right to anyone else's labor. But you tell me. I'll wrap it up there. Next segment's coming up in an hour or so. So stick around. Thanks for hanging out. We'll see you all then. Follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast and complain there or in the comments below.

Donald Trump has announced that on day one, he will sign an executive order ending birthright citizenship. And I agree. You can make a lot of arguments about why it should be abolished or never should have been in the first place. And I think many of the arguments are correct. Namely,

One could be that it was a different time back then, and as the country has changed, it doesn't quite make sense. That being the argument, you would need a constitutional amendment. However, if you actually look at the 14th Amendment, it says that if you are born here and subject to the jurisdiction...

That's where things are different. Someone who was born of parents who are not subject to the jurisdiction of this country should not be granted automatic citizenship. And we are one of the only countries in the world that does this. Now, in response to Donald Trump saying he's going to do this and he's going to start deporting, the left is calling for a blanket pardon of undocumented immigrants. That's right.

They say President Biden should issue a blanket pardon of undocumented immigrants. How about that? Protecting Trump's enemies from prosecution just reinforces the idea of politics as retribution. Instead, Democrats should be defending his most vulnerable targets.

So people who came here illegally broke the law. They're saying Biden should pardon. He effectively did this. A lot of the people that came in claiming that they were here for asylum were granted court hearings. And then those hearings were dropped. So they're in limbo. Second class citizens.

The Nation says the pardon phase of a lame duck presidency is never a pretty thing. Bill Clinton extended criminal pardons to big ticket donors such as Mark Rich and political allies such as Susan McDougal, Mel Reynolds and Dan Rostenkowski. I don't care about any of this. They're going to say in the waning days of the Biden presidency, the pardoning power is again being stretched, potentially taking a group that might be called imaginary henchmen. Lawmakers and officials deemed enemies of the MAGA movement, such as Anthony Fauci, Adam Schiff and who else they got?

Mark Milley, blah, blah, blah. The clutch of preemptive pardons is also response, et cetera, et cetera. So let me float a modest proposal. Took you long enough, dude.

To redeem the use of his pardon power, Biden should disperse it far and wide. One obvious use of it, which would yield robust moral and political benefits, would be to grant a preemptive pardon to undocumented and documented immigrants now facing the prospect of indiscriminate mass deportation when Trump takes office next month. People who entered the country illegally in the last 20 years who are currently awaiting an asylum decision or are under the age of 12.

Special care should be taken to include the legal recipients of temporary protected status, such as the Haitian community in Springfield, Ohio, relentlessly demonized by the Trump campaign. Trump is bound to try to abolish the TPS program. Oh, he literally will. You see, my friends, the purpose here is the left saying whatever it is, sane, reasonable people in this country are for, we're against.

What they're actually saying is if Trump is for it, we're against it. It makes no sense for anyone to allow illegal immigration. It is not going to make their lives better. It's not going to make our lives better. It seeks only to destroy this country. Take a look at literally any country with unfettered mass migration. Take a look at the history of Rome.

I love immigrants. I love immigration. Everyone in the world, literally all human beings. We call this the case for one billion Americans. That's right. They should come to this country legally. That means they can wait. They can file the paperwork. We make sure there's no criminals. There's no drugs. There's no trafficking. We figure out where best to place them to benefit the economy while maintaining cultural integrity. It's called legally. That's what Trump says. Legally.

The problem is the Democrats are saying, let them storm the gates, go wherever they want, do whatever they want, bring whatever they want, traffic children. Now, we're not going to tolerate that. Trump team preps executive order to end birthright citizenship on day one and good. I agree. They say the legal concept that if someone was born in the U.S., they're automatically considered to be a citizen. This comes as he sought to prepare a policy for immigration and secure the border. No European or Anglophone nation other than Canada has the blanket birthright citizenship that U.S. has.

The Trump team is crafting multiple versions of an executive order to end birthright citizenship, according to The Wall Street Journal. Trump has stood against against this for years concerning immigration, as as oftentimes immigrants who cross the border illegally have children in the U.S., making the children natural born citizens. This leads to a complicated legal situation where some people in a family could face deportation while others do not. Trump stated.

In an interview, he will deport sort of the children. And so you have these pearl clutching liberals who are like, but you would deport American citizens. And it's like, listen, if there are two adults that are not citizens and they have a child here and that child is a citizen, child can stay. You have two choices. We deport the parents. The child can stay as a ward of the state.

Or the child can go back with the parents. But you don't get to just live here for free forever by breaking our laws because you had a child. And then they say, but you're deporting an American citizen. What's wrong with living in other countries? I don't understand. You don't get free citizenship because you had a kid here. Not to mention, I don't think it makes sense that birthright citizenship exists in the first place.

Let's pull up the 14th Amendment so we can simplify it for you. Now, I know most of you already know this. It's got several sections. Before we read that, my friends, I got to shout out the right to arm bears over at boonies HQ dot com. If you are an advocate of large bears wearing flannel shirts with rolled up sleeves carrying shotguns, well, the right to arm bears skateboard is for you.

Put it on your wall. Write it with your feet. It's a fun skateboard. We got a bunch of other skateboards that are available. Step on, snack, and find out. Of course, we have Johnny Haynes' Gay Frogs. Love and respect to these two beautiful frogs that love each other. Drinking what appears to be, I guess, atrazine or whatever. I don't know. And a rainbow. Anyway, that's boonieshq.com. Back to what matters. Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof...

are citizens of the United States of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or reinforce any law that shall abridge the privileges of communities of citizens of the United States, nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Now, this amendment came to be because of the Civil War. And what they were saying was, slaves, you were born here. You are subject to our jurisdiction. You are citizens. That was the idea. The idea was that if you were a slave,

And you were born here and the government had jurisdiction over you. You were being granted rights. Look at the rest of the section of Section one that you have due process of law. Can I deny that to a person? It's about slavery. How this came to be that you could bring a pregnant woman from China. She'd fly here, give birth and then fly back. And now that kid's a citizen for life is insane. That that's nuts.

I think there's a lot of problems here. I had this argument with the I shouldn't say argument, but discussion with Cenk Uygur, where I was like, let me ask you guys this. A woman from China flies to California pregnant. She stays on a three month visa. And in that time, she gives birth. The baby is born, granted U.S. citizenship, and then flies back to China where the child is raised as a Chinese Communist Party member and exceptional citizen there.

At the age of 21, moves back to the United States to study English at college with deep and devout principles for communism. And then several years later, I think you got to be like 17 years something. I say 19 years later, this individual has a firm grasp on English, has been here for a long time, still deeply connected to Chinese communism, but is a citizen and runs for president. Would you prefer this or this?

Dinesh D'Souza, who is who is not born here? Well, obviously, most conservatives would say Dinesh, but he wasn't born here. This is an interesting point. Whether or not someone has a right to be president because they were born here makes no sense. I do understand the restriction and there's got to be a line somewhere. But ultimately, the issue here is all persons born in the U.S. and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens. It is not explicitly stating that once you're born here, you're a citizen. What they were saying was

slaves who were born here and subject to this jurisdiction are citizens. It was a it was for people who were already adults or or or just, you know, were born. If then the subject and subject to jurisdiction thereof with that line in there, it's basically saying if two people who aren't from here come here and give birth, you're not a citizen. I hope Trump does end this.

And here you go. This is where the left has lost their mind. Trump expands his deportation threats to U.S. citizens. No, he didn't. He said if it's a family that are undocumented and their children are our citizens, well, they can go back with their family or they can choose. They'll still be citizens now.

Let's see if Trump actually enacts this this ban or I should say not ban, but the executive order on this birthright citizenship. It would be interesting because I think Trump is a strong case. They can make the argument that Trump can't unilaterally change the Constitution. But I don't think Trump is. It literally says all persons born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof. Trump would literally just say we have to follow the Constitution. You don't get to just change what it is and interpret it that way.

I agree on the Constitution in meaning what the founders intended it to mean. The right to keep it by arm should not be infringed. OK, then I'd like to see Trump issue an executive order saying all gun laws are infringements because they literally are. But the Supreme Court interprets. We'll see if Trump has the ability to do this. It will be challenged and the Supreme Court will ultimately have to make a decision. So it's not that Trump will just win outright. The system will follow.

The Supreme Court will then have to issue their ruling. And with a six to three, it may actually just very easily fall in Trump's favor. We'll see, my friends. I'm going to wrap it up there. Smash the like button. Share the show with everyone. You know, become a member over at Timcast dot com. Follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast. And we'll we'll see you on the next segment. Donald Trump today called Trudeau the governor of the great state of Canada because he is a master troll.

But there is another story, which is quite hilarious. Jill Biden becomes involuntary model in Trump cologne ad. This man is too funny. So, of course, Donald Trump was seen sitting with Jill Biden and she's looking at him and smiling and everybody's like she she voted for that guy. Right.

Well, Donald Trump launched this fragrance ad called Fight, Fight, Fight. He says, here are my new Trump perfumes and colognes. I call them Fight, Fight, Fight because they represent us winning great Christmas gifts to the family. Go to GetTrumpFragrances.com. Merry Christmas. And then he's got Jill Biden looking at him and smiling. Fight, Fight, Fight, it's called. Absolutely hilarious.

They're going to say, so how did Trump repay Jill Biden's kindness by featuring her in an ad for his new Trump brand fragrances without her consent? He announced his perfume and cologne on Truth Social. Ha ha ha ha.

Right.

Yo, Trump is great. I love this. You've got Jill looking at him longingly. Let's pull up the website. Trump fragrance. You've got men's cologne and women's perfume.

Is this? No. Is he going to? Is there a video? Trump fragrances are here. They make a great Christmas present. I've named them fight, fight, fight because they represent winning. We all want to be winning. We have to win as a nation. We want to win as a family. This fragrance is all about strength and success and confidence for men and for women. How does he get yourself a bottle? And don't forget to grab one for your loved ones, too.

They'll thank you and they'll even smell good. Enjoy. Have fun. Keep on winning and Merry Christmas. Oh, man. What is this? There's. Oh, look at this. The bottle is it's a statue of Trump. Victory 47. This dude is a marketing genius because even his enemies will want to buy this. I'm sorry. It's it's it's hilarious.

I like Donald Trump. I think he'll be a good president. I'm excited for it. I don't think he'll be the best. I don't know. I mean, well, actually, he probably is the best. He's the best of my lifetime, at least. But, you know, there are other presidents. I don't know. I'm just saying he's going to be good. And I would buy this. I might. Because it's hilarious. Not because, you know, this is what these liberals don't understand. They think that Trump supporters are sitting there actually idolizing these things.

I went to a bar and they had a flag. It said Trump. Trump was riding a velociraptor with an Uzi and there's explosions behind him or some or he's on a tank. And you've seen him. And these liberals think it's serious. They don't understand that it's all just tongue in cheek and funny. I'm sure there are some people who will buy the golden statue Trump victory 47 where he looks rather slim.

and they'll do it to be like, wow, Trump's the greatest. I would buy this because it's funny. I bought Elon Musk's burnt hair cologne. It's over there. I've never smelled it, and I'm not going to. It's just funny. And it is kind of stupid that honestly, I can afford to buy something so dumb, but we have it anyway.

But I just find this hilarious that he basically used Jill Biden. And you know what I saw? You know what I thought of when I saw this? Have you guys seen this commercial? Gravitate cologne. It's a minute long. I'm going to play this for you, because if you watch Fox News, this commercial comes on nonstop. Well, I don't know. I watch I watch Fox on YouTube TV and they play this commercial probably because I'm a key demo male.

And they're like, target this person. But this commercial is laughably bad. Here, watch this. Okay, I'm going to describe a little bit. It's attractive women putting on blindfolds. I'm a little nervous. A man then spritzes himself with this gravité cologne. Do you tell me when it happens or? I love this.

Okay, so now there's like a guy wearing a suit. There's women blindfolded. He walks around him as they breathe and sniff. Listen to this. And the man leaves.

Did he just leave? Did he just leave? Come on, bring him back. If he smiles at me. Come on, bring him back. This good? He's got my attention. Look at the free commercial you're getting out of this gravite. Are they going to do the thing?

Bring him back, please. Bring him back, please. And then they show it again. And so here's why I find this is really hilarious. And this is what the Jill Biden thing reminded me of. I'm like, dude, these ladies are blindfolded. You know what they should have done for this commercial? How many views does it have, by the way? 121,000. Here's what I want to do. I want... And you know what? You guys watching, you can do this because you could probably just do it very easily. Just do VFX. And what I...

My vision for this commercial is someone holding up a dog's butt to the women's faces and they spritz his butt with the cologne. And then we're like, oh, bring it back, please. And it's just like a dog's ass. So the top comment is as a truck driver, all I can think of, what if they get sent in a greasy 400 pound, hadn't showered in two weeks, flies buzzing around him trucker. Would they would they would head for the hills? No, no. The point is, you know, the commercial uses some like.

you know, guy in a suit who's tall or whatever. The women can't see him. The point of the commercial is the smell is what sells the cologne. What you got to do, grab a particle. You want to sell this cologne. You need to get a big fat guy with a neck beard and a fedora swinging a katana. And then he sheathes his blade, spritzes himself twice and walks up and stands in front of the women. They're like, he smells so good. Bring him back, please.

And then you see, the point is even a weird antisocial guy with a fedora and neck beard can attract the women if he smells real good. However, Trump could also do something like this if if he wanted to. I guess Jon Stewart had choice words for Trump over this first lady. Here we go. Now, normally the first lady, Melania, would have been there to say to Donald, sit up.

But another stroke of weirdness, Trump was apparently traveling with his predecessor's wife, attending the opening of the Notre Dame Cathedral with Jill Biden. It was a rare moment of conciliation.

One that would have given this country hope had it not immediately been undermined by the returning president releasing an actual cologne ad belittling and sexualizing said moment. The caption there saying a fragrance your enemies can't resist. The men's cologne and women's perfume are both selling for $199. You...

You don't have to push merch anymore. Yes, he does. It's funny. John, come on. I find it hard to believe I'm saying this, but it's beneath. No, listen. No way. No way. John Stewart, of all people, should have busted out laughing. Bro, have a sense of humor. Now, if only because of this photo, it's worth buying.

Now, I don't know how many people really want to spend $200 on Trump perfume. But see, me, I'm going to buy it. I'm going to buy one for Seamus for Christmas. Seamus, I'm going to get you a bottle of Trump cologne for Christmas. Actually, I should buy a—can I get this in time for Christmas? Free shipping. Unlock exclusive VIP access. I think I might buy a bunch of this and give them out for Christmas because it's funny and because I can.

I know it's expensive. Maybe I shouldn't, but I think it'd be a great gift. I look in all seriousness. The only reason I would want to buy this is because of the photo he posted of Jill Biden. It is a is a physical meme. Basically, the statue embodies the statement he made about Jill Biden, how he trolled the Biden family after he won. So Jon Stewart saying it's beneath you. You don't have to sell merch. What are you talking about, dude? It's one of the funniest things he could have done. Trump said, y'all are going to get tired of winning. Remember? Well, I'm not.

I think it's funny. The fact that even Jon Stewart has to try and feign this like, oh, I can't believe he did it, just shows Trump is really winning. Now, I will say the funniest thing is that I have before me these two coins. Let me grab them.

These two coins that were being sold during the height of the cycle, you got Joe Biden on one and then Trump in prison on the back. And then this one, you got Donald Trump on the front with Joe Biden in prison on the back. And it was kind of a bummer because Joe Biden dropped out of the race. So, you know, Trump is not going to prison. But I wonder if Joe Biden I don't think Joe Biden's going to prison either, because it really does seem like Joe is happy that Trump won.

I think Joe got his revenge. And that's the real reason Jill is smiling at Donald Trump is because the Democratic Party betrayed the Biden family, cast him out. And she she voted for Trump. That's the secret. The known secret, I guess. I mean, we don't really know that she did, but I think it's very obvious he did. So congratulations to Donald Trump on his new business venture. This man knows how to sell. OK, laugh a little, John. It's funny.

Smash the like button. Share the show with everyone you know. Become a member over at TimCast.com. TimCast IRL coming up next, 8 p.m. Stick around. We'll see you there. Thanks for hanging out.