Legal AF Full Episode - 6/14/2025
01:28:01 Share

This episode is brought to you by LifeLock. Between two-factor authentication, strong passwords, and a VPN, you try to be in control of how your info is protected. But many other places also have it, and they might not be as careful. That's why LifeLock monitors hundreds of millions of data points a second for threats. If your identity is stolen, they'll fix it, guaranteed, or your money back. Save up to 40% your first year. Visit LifeLock.com slash podcast for 40% off. Terms apply.

The NBA playoffs are here, and I'm getting my bets in on FanDuel. Talk to me, Chuck GPT. What do you know? All sorts of interesting stuff. Even Charles Barkley's greatest fear. Hey, nobody needs to know that. New customers bet $5 to get 200 in bonus bets if you win. FanDuel, America's number one sportsbook.

21 plus and present in Illinois. Must be first online real money wager. $5 deposit required. Bonus issued is non-withdrawable bonus pass that expires seven days after receipt. Restrictions apply. See full terms at fanduel.com slash sportsbook. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.

Raise the rudders. Raise the sails. Raise the sails. Captain, an unidentified ship is approaching. Over. Roger. Wait, is that an enterprise sales solution? Reach sales professionals, not professional sailors. With LinkedIn ads, you can target the right people by industry, job title, and more. We'll even give you a $100 credit on your next campaign. Get started today at linkedin.com slash results. Terms and conditions apply.

Want to sharpen your aim, save money on ammo, and train like the pros, all from the comfort of your home? Meet Mantis X, the cutting-edge dry fire training system used by the Marine Corps, Army, and Special Forces to build precision and confidence. 94% of shooters report improved accuracy in just 20 minutes, and you could be next.

With Mantis X, you train with your own firearm, anytime, anywhere, without wasting a single round. In less than two weeks, the system pays for itself in ammo savings alone. As a proud gun owner, I believe in the Second Amendment.

but rights come with responsibility. That means refining your accuracy, mastering your skills, and staying prepared every time you train. Whether you're a new shooter or an experienced marksman, Mantis X helps you train smarter, shoot better, and defend what matters most. Get yours today at MantisX.com. That's MantisX.com.

Race the rudders. Race the sails. Race the sails. Captain, an unidentified ship is approaching. Over. Roger. Wait, is that an enterprise sales solution? Reach sales professionals, not professional sailors. With LinkedIn ads, you can target the right people by industry, job title, and more. We'll even give you a $100 credit on your next campaign. Get started today at linkedin.com slash results. Terms and conditions apply.

Major legal news this week. We're going to break it all down for everybody. Abrego Garcia back in the United States under an indictment for human trafficking and conspiracy to commit human trafficking. One of the most embarrassing detention hearings I've ever seen from the perspective of the Department of Justice trying to indefinitely hold Abrego Garcia in detention. They literally had the United States Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee

conduct the proceedings. He said that he drew the short straw, like he didn't even really want to be there. And it was just obvious that he was relying on just these cooperating witnesses who were not reliable at all. We'll see what happens, but it definitely showed the importance of due process. I want to break down everything that took place there. Then we'll talk about Donald Trump's federalizing of the National Guard.

the ruling by a federal judge in the Northern District of California, Judge Breyer, who blocked Donald Trump from utilizing, federalizing the National Guard under 10 U.S.C. 12406.

finding that the specific statute and the provisions in which you could federalize the National Guard did not apply to this specific situation. Donald Trump immediately appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. They stayed the ruling of Judge Breyer meeting the National Guard.

is still being federalized and still permitted basically to be co-opted by Donald Trump. We'll break down everything going on there. There's going to be an immediate hearing though on that this week. Um, we'll talk about what we expect is going to happen. Uh, Donald Trump lost his, uh, appeal before the full panel of the second circuit court of appeal in the E. Jean Carroll sexual assault case. Yes, that case is still working its way through the court of appeals. There were, uh,

Two judges who were in the dissent there, and I think it was an eight to two opinion. We'll break that down. I guess it potentially goes to the Supreme Court next, although I'll get your thoughts, Popak, if you think that that's going to be a case that the Supreme Court even takes. But who knows when it comes to Donald Trump? Another important federal ruling when it comes to Trump's attempt to federalize state election law, an injunction blocking Trump's attempt there.

Then earlier today, of course, we learned about the horrific assassination of Democratic Representative Melissa Hortman in Minnesota, the Minnesota speaker there, and the state senator John Hoffman there by an individual who was dressed as a

police officer and imitating a police officer, horrific, horrific stuff. And you just reflect on this week, whether it was a California Senator, not state Senator, United States Senator being thrown to the ground by,

Donald Trump's Gestapo and being detained and attacked for trying to ask a question in the Los Angeles FBI office of the Department of Homeland Security Director Kristi Noem, whether it's Trump calling for the arrest of California Governor Gavin Newsom this week.

The Speaker of the House, Maga Mike Johnson, saying that Newsom should be tarred and feathered. You have a congresswoman, MacGyver, who's been charged. You have a judge in Wisconsin who's going through a criminal proceeding, and she's filed a motion to dismiss based on immunity grounds. I mean, it's...

This is just what we're talking about in the law, yet alone the war raging now in the Middle East. And certainly a dystopian moment, Michael Popak, in American history, I mean, to say the least. It's a solemn start to a show, but it needs to be. About three and a half years ago, you and I started a show right when Ukraine was invaded by Russia.

And you said you look very upset or solemn. I said, I am. The world has changed as we know it with the attack there. And I think everything that we've just watched over the last, it's hard to believe, 72 hours with a war that has started between Israel and Iran supported by Donald Trump, you

the use of military assets against American citizens on domestic soil that we'll talk about when we get to the Judge Breyer case and explain why, even though there's a stay at the Ninth Circuit, it's not stopping the progress of justice in his courtroom as it relates to the use of the Marines against citizens like you and me in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act. We'll talk about how, and I'll put it in my own perspective,

The seething cauldron that Donald Trump has created, putting Americans and pitting them against each other and putting them at each other's throats, which he needs in order to thrive. He feeds off that negative energy over those attacks, and it animates his policies of suppression and repression that come from having Americans at each other's throats. He's no better than Americans.

And he benefits from the trolls around the world in North Korea and Russia and Iran and other places in China that use and infiltrate our social media and using AI and other methods in order to make us weaker and to make us attack each other. And it's only in that type of environment

Will you have some crazed gunman with a target list of Democratic lawmakers and a no-Kings demonstration flyer in his car now abandoned while he's still on the loose, at least while we're on the air? You have that environment creating that moment.

And as a lot of Democratic lawmakers are now saying, Donald Trump has blood on his hands, even though he's given that hopes and prayers social media post and there'll be prosecutions. I believe this doesn't happen in another type of world where we have a unifying president, not one who almost like an anti-Abe Lincoln uses federal troops not to reconstruct

not to reunite, not to enforce civil rights the way that Lyndon Johnson or Eisenhower did or others did, but instead to continue to divide and try to tear this union asunder. That's what we're watching. It's not an attack on California. It's an attack on federalism. It's an attack on every state that Donald Trump, from his bully pulpit being and with

and with his puppet master, Stephen Miller, dictating immigration and deportation policy, that he is rolling out the troops against a state and a leading political rival. We said with quite a lot of solemnity when we watched the results and the debate on the oral argument around the immunity decision, as was posed by a appellate court judge,

What's to stop Donald Trump from using SEAL Team 6 to take out his political rival? Aren't we watching Donald Trump testing that theory? When a United States senator not only gets taken down and handcuffed in front of a Christy Noem, and Donald Trump's reaction to that is not, that was inappropriate. That was excessive. It was, well, I don't know, he looked like an immigrant.

Because he's brown? Because he's Latino? He looked like an immigrant. And so what were they to suspect? That was his reaction. So as you said, when you have their testing, this is like a toddler testing, except a toddler that has the full power of the military behind him.

So they take down they take down that they arrest, as you said, a representative in Congress. They they indict also a sitting judge in there. And then and then what do we have? Is anyone shocked that on No King's Day, while Donald Trump is doing a Soviet style victory parade down Pennsylvania Avenue with 60 ton M1 Abrams tanks?

And I feel sorry for the military, although the brass, and I use that term lightly, that has still left, that allowed their 250-year anniversary to be co-opted and hijacked by Donald Trump for his birthday parade. And plenty of military who not only filed amicus briefs in the case we're going to talk about involving Judge Breyer,

four-star generals and secretaries of the army and the others who said this is an inappropriate use of federalizing the National Guard. Not only that, but there are military retired who have come out and said they are scared about the Tiananmen Square potential where China rolled tanks over protesters.

of what Donald Trump has set up in Washington for today. The counter-protesting has taken on an entirely new meaning for me now that we've got the assassination, an attempted assassination of two lawmakers, Democratic and Minnesota, along with their spouses. You know, I have videos up and talking about No Kings. This is our Selma, Alabama moment of peaceful protest, but disobedience and resistance in the streets,

But now it takes on a whole new meaning. You've got purpley state

governors who are, because they're obeying in advance, they are rolling out the state militia or the state National Guard because they don't want Donald Trump to do it for them, even though there's no threats, credible threats. We now have the credible threats. And I'm worried about people on the street and everybody should be, everybody needed to be very careful out there during the No Kings Day. Although it is important at these moments that we apply public pressure

to support our legislators like the Democrats, to support our federal judges, to have the Supreme Court hear us in the moment about Donald Trump's fascist policies. Let's get into it. Let's talk first about the case involving Trump federalizing the National Guard. The case is called Gavin Newsom versus Donald Trump in the Northern District of California.

And the order that dropped on June 12th, 2025, so two days ago, granted the application by the state of California and the governor to block what Donald Trump did, which was to federalize the National Guard. The National Guard is normally under the control and command of

of the governor of the state and governor Gavin Newsom relies on the state national guard in California to do things like wildfire prevention. You know, when there's wildfires in San Bernardino, for example, like, like it was like is happening. That's how the national guard is normally utilized. And when the federal government, uh,

in an unprecedented fashion co-ops a state national guard and sends 4 000 of the state national guard to not really do anything of of of kind of clear purpose just to make the showing of force and not know what they're even supposed to do you're pulling the resources away from a state governor

states' rights. Isn't that what the Republicans always used to say? And you're parading them around for a show of dictatorial force in a way that's very harmful to the state. So Governor Newsom, along with the Attorney General of the state of California, sued the Trump regime and said, what the hell are you doing? This is unlawful. You're citing a statute 10 U.S.C. 12406,

which requires that you can only federalize the National Guard in very few circumstances. And there are three circumstances that are listed in the statute. One, the United States or any of the commonwealths or possessions is invaded by a foreign nation. Two, there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the government of the United States.

Or three, the president is unable with regular force to execute the laws of the United States. The statute 10 U.S.C. 12406 goes on to say that it is required that the governor

basically agree to this federalizing of the National Guards at the request of the president to the governor and the governor has to approve it. So the Trump regime, Michael Popock and legal AFers, they concede, okay, we haven't been invaded by a foreign nation, but they say we're under a rebellion against the United States right now and that Donald Trump can't with regular forces execute the laws of the United States anymore.

And so there was a hearing that took place this week and Judge Breyer, the federal judge in the Northern District of California, looked at Trump's DOJ lawyer and says, come on, we're not under a rebellion. We're not under, you know, you're telling me Trump can't execute the laws anymore because there have been 300 to 400 people who have been arrested in Los Angeles, which by the way, it's like

less than the amount of people that get arrested when the Dodgers win the World Series. This is not like I live in Los Angeles, like agitators and people who engage in any form of violence need to be dealt with with the full force of the law.

But by and large, almost all of the protests were peaceful. And then in terms of where the agitators were, small area of downtown Los Angeles in a sprawling county, LAPD and L.A. Sheriff saying, look, we're able to easily handle this.

It didn't even get to the point where we would even think about the National Guard. It didn't even get to the highest levels of kind of the intra-department policies because this is stuff that the LAPD and LA Sheriff's Department are just equipped to deal with. Popak, the Trump regime's, the DOJ lawyer, though, basically their main argument to the judge is, you can't even ask us these questions.

The moment that Donald Trump claims that there's a rebellion or claims that he can't execute the laws, it ends there because he's dealing with foreign policy. He's the commander in chief. The Constitution says that he shall take care that the laws are faithfully executed. So it's Donald Trump's subjective belief that there's a rebellion.

This is not and this is what Trump's this. This is the main argument that Trump made in front of the judge. This is not a justiciable issue. Courts have no roles in making this decision. This is purely the subjective intent of the president. And what was interesting, and I'll toss it back to you, Popak, is Judge Breyer.

cited some of the other cases involving Trump's deportations of people to El Salvador. And he cited a Trump, that's Trump appointed judge in Texas on the issue of justiciability. And let me just pull up this portion on justiciability because you can see how like one judge cites another judge. And it's interesting that he specifically picked

the Trump appointed judge out in the Texas court. Judge Breyer says, this court agrees with Judge Rodriguez's thoughtful analysis in the JAV deportation case and finds it applicable here. To start, JAV is in line with other decisions rebuffing efforts

from defendants to skirt judicial review of their alleged statutory violations. And so there's this whole body of law of the Trump regime saying, we do whatever the hell we want. Courts, you can't decide. And there's courts saying, no, we do decide. We're the courts. Courts decide the law. And that's kind of where we're at. Not just in this case, though, Popak, but in terms of like every case that Trump says, yes,

Yes, that's what the law says, but the president takes care that the law is faithfully executed. Don't ask any further questions. That's the whole, it all comes down to that. So talk to us. What did Judge Breyer do? Where are we at with the Court of Appeals?

Well, there's been a development even since then. So Friday, we get the order. I'll read some aspects of the order that I find are the most interesting. As you said, Breyer finds after a hearing in which he's very carefully questioning the lawyers for the Department of Justice. You know, this is the family business. 83-year-old senior status judge in San Francisco is brother Stephen Breyer of the Supreme Court. So he knows what he's doing. This is what I'm trying to say. He's seen it all.

And he instantly goes to the statute that you talked about, which is known as the Militia Act of 1903.

basically says i see the three things here i don't really see how this is he literally says in his order i don't see how throwing mangoes water bottles and chairs and maybe some concrete by some people constitutes an armed rebellion as that term is used in any dictionary definition from 1903 even till now and how is it organized these independent things and he said he also said in the order and in the hearing he's very troubled by the argument

that it's your justiciable argument that Trump can declare any First Amendment expression where there are a couple of bad apples in there, a couple of bad actors in there, that doesn't convert First Amendment expression that is defended vigorously by our Constitution and our founding fathers into a rebellion to be quashed and crushed by a president. And that is a scary, slippery slope that the judge calls out. He has to start because, as you said,

Trump always starts all of his cases with its political question, which is a bastardization of a political doctrine, of a doctrine, a term of art coming out of the United States Supreme Court, that if it's truly a political issue, then the only way you can fix it is not in the courts, but at the ballot box.

but this is not a political issue oh yes it is the trump administration says it says here that i can have the power if there's a rebellion i can't faithfully execute the laws or an insurrection or other things i get to do i get to use these powers these superpowers right and i get to declare whether there is one of those those uh three things under the militia act and you can't challenge it because it's a political question no it's not that is a mis

misinterpretation on purpose of what the political question is in order to deny federal judges oversight. And every judge has to start with Marbury versus Madison, which you and I learned like day one in constitutional law class in our respective law schools all over again. Let's remind the president what the role of the federal judiciary is under Article III since the case of Marbury versus Madison.

You do you do you but we do us and what we're doing us as judges we get to it's just dishable So and as you said he points to judge Rodriguez a Trump appointed judge in the Southern District of Texas Who ruled in one of the immigration cases against Donald Trump on alien enemies Act and he says I like that framework I'm gonna adopt that framework, but he also put Easter egg bear trap. He also put in his order in his temporary restraining order a

a trap for the Trump administration, which they've already walked into. He said, I'm going to grant the temporary restraining order under, I'm going to find that what Donald Trump did was illegal, that it violated the Militia Act of 1903. This is that 10 USC 12406 statute we keep talking about, because none of the things that trigger your entitlement as president to use your power to commandeer, pardon me, and federalize the state

National Guard are present and I get to oversee and provide oversight as to whether you're right or wrong. And so that's not present. So you have violated that. You also did not consult properly or go through the governor for the issuance of the order. They said, yes, we did. They said, how did you do that? Well, we typed the governor's name on the top of the memo. I said, sorry?

you didn't consult with the governor you barely spoke to the governor you didn't coordinate any of these things that that happened in the raids on the 6th of june but we put his name at the top yeah that's not what the federal statute and the act of congress requires the judge also found they violated the 10th amendment which is a little litigated but very important part that holds our whole union together of federalism

If it's not in an act of Congress and it's not in the Constitution for a federal power, for a federal role, then all other power is in the hands of the people in the state. That's it.

That's it. That keeps the feds out of a lot of different things and holds our union together because states weren't going to join and leave the confederation and join the United States of America unless they had continued state sovereignty and states rights. And so Donald Trump has attacked that by today. It's California tomorrow, fill in the blank state.

by coming in and violating the sovereignty of California. But the judge punted but set up the trap on what we call the Posse Conventatus Act, which is an act that generally prevents anybody sitting in the office of the presidency from using the weight of the U.S. military, the awesome power of the U.S. military internally.

on domestic soil for law enforcement purposes. That sounds like a good thing. Like, I don't want the tanks and the M-16s pointed at me by federal officers on domestic soil as a citizen or otherwise during a protest because that violates the act. There are things you can do to support law enforcement, but you can't, for instance, detain people. And what Breyer said is, look, I got the record in front of me.

I am issuing the temporary restraining order on the violation of the 10th Amendment and on the violation of the Militia Act. On the Posse Comitatus Act, we're close, but we're not there yet. But I'm setting a hearing for next week on preliminary injunction, because just to remind everybody and maybe new people joining Legal AF,

There's levels of injunctions and blocks that a judge, appellate or trial can do. Starts with an administrative stay sometimes, which is like, could be hours or days just to give the judge time or the appellate court time to kind of get the briefs in. Then it moves to a temporary restraining order, which can last days, weeks, less than a month usually, maybe a little bit longer until they can get around to the preliminary injunction.

Generally, temporary restraining orders do not give appellate courts jurisdiction to review them and to stay them. Usually that you have to wait, as the Supreme Court has said recently, you have to wait till you get to the preliminary injunction phase. That's next week.

The judge said, let's see what the evidence is, because I see a lot of speculation by California about the Marines arriving and what they're really going to do. But you don't have evidence yet that they have detained, arrested and other things. But let's see what next week brings.

And what now, what do we have? We wake up last night or we go to bed last night with the reporting of Reuter taking a photo of what appears to be a peaceful protester in zip ties, you know, behind his back by the Marines in front of the Wilshire Federal Building in L.A.

And I'm sure there's more examples. So that goes like wildfire on social media and reporting that, okay, well, Breyer anticipated it. We now have the violation of the Posse Comitatus Act.

Now, just to clear up where we are procedurally, there is a stay issued by effectively all three judges, but two Trump judges appointed in the Ninth Circuit on an emergency application for a stay of the judge's temporary restraining order. They've issued an administrative stay with a briefing schedule for next week to determine whether there should be a stay of the temporary restraining order while they litigate the underlying merits of the appeal.

I don't see the grounds for it. I don't see them having jurisdiction for it. They've asked for a briefing from California, who I'm sure will say you don't have jurisdiction under the temporary restraining order. We're already in the process of preliminary injunction for next week. So stay out of it or keep your administrative stay, but don't make that other ruling.

They are now briefing that issue, but that does not divest the trial court, Judge Breyer, of jurisdiction to continue administering justice in that case, including moving forward with everything else, whether it's a contempt proceeding in the future or the preliminary injunction hearing next week. That continues on a fast track.

If he rules after that, that they have violated the 10th, the Militia Act and the Posse Comitatus Act, he will enter a preliminary injunction, which now triggers appellate jurisdiction back to the Ninth Circuit, I assume that same panel. And then whoever is the loser there

it as the time ticks by because the troops are currently still federalized I'm talking about the National Guard and there's no ruling about the Marines yet that will then go back to the Ninth Circuit and

who will make whatever ruling they're going to make. And just because they're doing the briefing on a fast track doesn't mean they're going to rule on a fast track. You and I waited around two years ago for over a month for the immunity decision to come out of the D.C. court before it went to the Supremes. I don't know, could be another month, meaning troops on the ground, Donald Trump pouring kerosene over the fire in California in order to repress them and to suppress them.

And so whoever loses at the Ninth Circuit in two weeks, three weeks or four weeks, now we're off to another emergency application to the United States Supreme Court. And the question I have for you, Ben, is once it gets to the Supreme Court, given now what we know from the Trump law that's been developed over the last 175 days,

watching them when it's presidential power versus immigration or due process rights versus church and state, all the over federal funding and DOGE, all the rulings that we've got. Can you make heads or tails how when they're presented with this issue, this statute, this amendment and this Posse Comitatus Act, what they're going to do? Yeah, I think it's going to be a seven to two decision.

I think, though, before the 7-2 decision, they're going to issue an administrative stay that will still keep in place the National Guard being federalized for

a period that is way too long. I think ultimately the Supreme Court makes the right decision. And on a case like this, they rule against Donald Trump and say that he can't federalize the National Guard on a seven to two basis. I'll give you the breakdown of where I think that's going to happen. I'll get your take on it as well. But let's take our first quick break of the show. I want to remind everybody about Michael Popock.

YouTube channel, the Legal AF YouTube channel. It's absolutely crushing it on its way to 1 million subscribers, racing past that 500,000 subscriber mark. Make sure you all subscribe. I want to see that Legal AF channel get 1 million subscribers. Michael Popak is also now on Substack.

Legal AF Substack is crushing it as well. Check that out. And Michael Popak's new law firm, the Popak firm, signing up a lot of cases from our viewers here, Michael Popak. I know the firm was inspired by our listeners and viewers who had cases and they wanted you to represent them and they wanted you and your network of lawyers to represent.

to represent them. And you couldn't do that, what you were doing before. So you started your own law firm right now, and it's off to a great start. Catastrophic injury cases like bad trucking accidents and people who are involved in car accidents, sexual assault and sexual harassment cases, wrongful death cases. If someone you know was involved in a wrongful death case, any really kind of big negligence case, reach out to the Popeye for a medical malpractice. Where can they find you, Popeye?

Yeah, thanks. And as you convinced me last week, dog bite cases, serious dog bite cases. Look, one of the things we've learned at the intersection of law and politics is that good lawyering matters. And so I've assembled a group that are expert in their jurisdiction, in your jurisdiction,

and know their way around those courts. And that's what you need in this particular situation. So reach out to the Popock firm. It's easy. If you want to talk to somebody and they're standing by, you can call them at 1-877-POPOCKAF. That's P-O-P-O-K-A-F. Or if you'd just like to go on the website and end up with our free consultation case evaluation form, you can go to www.thepopockfirm.com.

We'll be right back after our first quick break of the show. Life moves fast. And sometimes you just need a way to relax, recharge, or refocus without overcomplicating things. That's where Vaya comes in. I've been using Vaya's gummies lately, and I have to say they work.

When I need to wind down at the end of a long day, Vya hits the mark. I love that I can choose how strong I want the experience from zero THC to full effect options. These aren't random gas station gummies. Vya makes effect-driven, high-quality products that enhance your every day. With over a half a million happy customers and a product line made from organic ingredients,

Lab-tested hemp grown right here in the U.S., VIA is the real deal. Plus, they ship discreetly and legally to your door. No medical card required. If you're 21 years or older, try VIA for 15% off and a free gift with your first order. Head to via.co slash legal AF and use code legal AF. That's V-I-I-A dot C-O slash legal AF.

Code Legal AF. Enhance your every day with VIA. I may be very open with you on this podcast, but off the air, I really do value my privacy. And it's 2025. Are your blinds still from 2005? There is a better way to buy blinds, shades, shutters, and drapery, and it's called three-day blinds.

They are the leading manufacturer of high quality custom window treatments in the US. And right now, if you use my URL, 3dayblinds.com/legalaf, they're running a buy one, get one 50% off deal. We can shop for almost anything at home. Why not shop for blinds at home too?

3 Day Blinds has local, professionally trained design consultants who have an average of over 10 years of experience that provide expert guidance on the right blinds for you in the comfort of your home. Just set up an appointment and you'll get a free, no obligation quote the same day. Not very handy? DIY projects can be fun, but measuring and installing blinds can be a big challenge.

The expert team at Three Day Blinds handles all the heavy lifting. They design, measure, and install so you can sit back, relax, and leave it to the pros. It's 2025, and so much of my house is smart with Alexa, but I never thought about getting my blinds connected to Alexa too, so I can just say, Alexa, open the blinds each morning.

With three-day blinds, you choose from thousands of options that fit any budget or style. And with actual samples, you won't be guessing about what your blinds will look like.

Three Day Blinds has been in business for over 45 years, and they have helped over 2 million people get the window treatments of their dreams. So they are a brand you can trust. Right now, get quality window treatments that fit your budget with Three Day Blinds. Head to 3dayblinds.com slash Legal AF for their buy one, get one 50% off deal on custom blinds, shades, shutters, and drapery.

For a free, no charge, no obligation consultation, just head to 3dayblinds.com slash Legal AF. One last time, that's buy one, get one, 50% off when you head to the number three, dayblinds.com slash Legal AF.

Welcome back to Legal AF. Thank you to all of our pro-democracy sponsors right there. This show is not possible without those pro-democracy sponsors. My younger brother, Jordy, does a great job negotiating some really great discounts. The discounts for those sponsors are in the description below. So you asked me, what do I think the Supreme Court's going to do based on the kind of precedent, if you will, of what's been taking place already this term?

You know, on the outer limits of dictatorial power, we've usually been seeing the Supreme Court rule against Donald Trump. But first, they kind of go through this exercise of granting Donald Trump the administrative stay that he requests, preserving.

Not the status quo that existed before Trump engages in a disastrous executive order or take some really harmful action, but the status quo as it exists once Trump implements that really bad thing so that often that bad thing remains in place for a long period of time.

But if it goes on the outer limits of dictatorial power, you really only see two of the justices who have been siding with Donald Trump, Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Alito, seem to side with Donald Trump on everything. This is one of those cases, Popak, for all of the reasons you laid out, though, because it violates the statute, it violates the 10th Amendment, and it violates just kind of common sense.

I could see this being one of those nine to zero rulings, like the facilitate the return of a Brego Garcia ruling that we'll talk about a Brego in a bit. That was a nine to zero, uh, ruling there. So this feels like it'll be a seven to two or even a, uh, nine to zero. Um, but you know, I think you'll clearly have, um,

You'll clearly have, you know, Ketanji Brown Jackson. I think you'll clearly have Kagan. You'll clearly have Sotomayor, the three liberal justices. I think you're going to get Roberts. I think you're going to get their...

I think you'll get Amy Coney Barrett. And then the question is, are you going to get Gorsuch and Kavanaugh? And I think in a case like this, given their kind of states rights backgrounds, I just think you get them. So that's what I, what do you think will happen? I know. I, I, I agree with you. I think it's going to be a win for our constitutional Republic and our, and our system of federalism. It goes to the very core of who we are as a United States of America.

And they're going to quickly, I think, dispatch the argument about lack of judicial oversight over anything Donald Trump wants to do. I mean, let's just call it out. Let's take the scales off our eyes, which you and I have been working on with our audience for five years, which is what we're watching, which is Donald Trump creating phony emergencies, phony wars, phony indictments,

phony you know uh rebellions or insurrections in order to use the crushing superpowers that are given to presidents only in those limited circumstances okay you know i just picture a book on his desk that was created by like a three-ring binder created by stephen miller of war powers and what you have to uh you what and what you have to lie to the american people about in order to use them

But that's not working in federal courts, and that's not working with appellate courts in general. And I don't think it works with the lineup that you just gave there, because this tension of the unitary president model, which five of them believe in, or at least four of them strongly believe in, runs counter to states' rights and state sovereignty. And I've seen enough written by Kavanaugh and Gorsuch, at least, to believe that even they... So whether it's

whether it's 6-2, sorry, 6-3 or 7-2 in that ballpark. But you're right, you'll never get Alito and Thomas. They're going to be, well, he's the commander-in-chief. They'll do a whole analysis that doesn't even fit

with what you're supposed to be analyzing under the language of the statute or under federalism. And they'll say, well, this is like a war power. And they'll go off because they'll reverse engineer it. What's the outcome we want? The president to be able to do what he just did? Okay. And then they start pulling out of their tool bag of monkey wrenches all the things that get them there. Oh, is it originalism? Saying that the text has to match exactly with the founding? No, that doesn't work. Is it dictionary definitions? No, that doesn't work. Is it public policy? No.

Maybe, is it war powers? Oh, war powers, that'll get us there. That's how they operate. I'm talking about at least four, if not, yeah, four on the total right wing. But we're going to get there quick. You know, I never thought in my, I keep saying this out loud. I guess it's comforting to me. I never thought you and I would be doing this.

and hot takes about a president's violation of the Posse Comitatus Act, the Alien Enemies Act, laws on the books since 1903 or 1878 or everything else. I thought these were inviolable guardrails around our democracy until we elected rogue, lawless, felon-in-chief

who his entire animating principle for his presidency, as we've said throughout, is to crush dissent, to repress, and to be vindictive and retribution against those he sees as his political enemies, which is frankly anybody that's not MAGA and supporting him.

Well, you know, earlier this week when Donald Trump was at Fort Bragg, where he handpicked the soldiers behind him, that would be that supported him politically and they were selling all of the MAGA gear. One of the things that Donald Trump was talking about in his speech with the military flanking him in the background was using the military to.

to liberate Los Angeles. That's what he said. We need to liberate Los Angeles. And then his Department of Homeland Security cosplay dog killer, Kristi Noem, when she went to the Los Angeles FBI office right before that incident where the Senator Alex Padilla of California was thrown to the ground and detained for trying to ask her a question. She was giving a speech like a coup leader

who just invaded a country or had just taken over the country from within. And she was speaking in Los Angeles and her speech was, "Los Angeles has been liberated. The military is on the streets. The Marines are here. The National Guard has been federalized.

You are now safe because of that. It was a coup speech. So the democratically elected California Senator Alex Padilla was asking a question when she was talking about her liberation of Los Angeles, which by the way, it's the most delusional concept in the world of the 4,000 national guard troops that have been federalized. Only about a hundred to 200 of them have actually been operationalized because the

there's no plan with what to do with them. They're not trained to do this. So you have 100 to 200 of them surrounding some of the federal buildings like

like kind of glorified bodyguards or glorified bouncers that you may see at like standing in front of a club, you know, as people are, you know, as people are looking at them and saying, what the hell are you doing in our city? Why are you doing that? You know, what do you do in the city? And then Trump adds on top of that, you know, the Marines and, and, and, and calls the Marines to come in, in addition to federalizing the national guard. But,

But, you know, to your point, you know, we're talking about the language of dictators, of coup leaders saying that they're liberating American cities, you know, and that what needs to be conquered and taken over are liberal blue cities. And I've said this about California. I'll just say it again. California has the fourth largest GDP in the world. If California was a country, it would have the fourth largest GDP. Our diversity is

makes California great. The migrant community in California helps California. You know how Donald Trump says that the United States subsidizes Canada, which it doesn't because Donald Trump doesn't understand the way deficits work. California literally subsidizes mostly every red state. All of the red states are failed states.

They're the worst in education, worst when it comes to mortality, poverty, mortality, quality of living, health. You name every stat, those red states are the are the worst. They're taker states.

And then they have the audacity to basically say we're sending in the troops to go after California and really have tipped to California. Governor Gavin Newsom, who I think has shown awesome leadership over this. Very, very much so. And we here at the Midas Touch Network were the exclusive live streamers of his major address to the state and to the country. And look.

what legal efforts of Midas Mighty and others were able to do. Donald Trump figured out, as Gavin Newsom said, that it's bad. It's a bad look and bad politics to be chasing people, human beings through through supermarkets and hotel lobbies and factory floors and food and food and agricultural plants. That was a bad look. So Donald Trump issued a new ruling through his immigration is his ice that says and see, they know the term.

They know that they, Donald Trump knows that not all undocumented are criminals because that's the instant conflagration that Donald Trump does in order to support his inhumane policies. They're all criminals. They're all rapists and drug users and drug dealers and human traffickers. We'll get to Abrego Garcia in a minute.

But they actually have a term for the hardworking undocumented that do the dirty jobs that nobody wants to do in America, that make up a large percentage of many of our industries like hospitality, construction, food, food processing. They're known as, listen to this, Ben, let's talk about Orwellian vocabulary, non-Christianity.

criminal collateral. You know what non-criminal collateral is in Trump's vocabulary? It's the undocumented who have not committed any crime. And now he's sent out a memo that said, and Gavin Newsom did a great job trolling him about it. I guess you figured out it wasn't a good look to be chasing through, chasing brown people through hotel lobbies and factories, right? So now it says stay ice. Don't do any raids if it involves agriculture, hotels,

and food plants. Stay away from them if they're non-criminal collateral, meaning they're not doing anything wrong. Don't arrest them. A recognition, as he did when he owned hotels and golf courses and employed a lot of undocumented people, that this is part of the lifeblood of our economy and putting them far underground out of fear instead of giving them a dignified path

to citizenship or permanent residency is probably not a good look. But I find it remarkable, and the press, of course, doesn't cover it enough, that he has a term. He knows what undocumenteds that are just hardworking and hoping to God that there is a new president that comes in in 2028 who knows about ethnic diversity and its value, such as Gavin Newsom, that will reward them for paying their taxes, keeping their nose clean,

not committing crimes and doing the jobs that Americans by and large don't want to do. And they're holding on, barely holding on. At the same time, Stephen Miller, who gives out the command, there needs to be 3,000 arrests a day

which amps it up. They finally get the 2,000 arrests a day leading into California. And focus, listen to this, Ben. Stephen Miller wants ICE to focus on Home Depot and the parking lots because they've recognized that over the last 30 years, there's a lot of undocumented day laborers and other workers there. So he's like, let's go, let's do the raid in the Home Depot parking lot, which is a red-owned, MAGA-owned place

company that has Donald Trump's ear, the Home Depot people, big supporters of Donald Trump. And now they're just going to turn away other human beings and let ICE do raids in Home Depot parking lots. And you know what they do for the employees at Home Depot, Ben? They can't report it. They have to report it on a database that there was an ICE raid. And they get to go home if they were offended by anything that happened in the parking lot. But they're not going to stop it either.

You know, and that brings us to Abrego Garcia and the importance of due process, due process, due process. Because regardless of what the outcome of this detention hearing in the Middle District of Tennessee Federal Court is, Boat Buck, the importance of due process, I think, was demonstrated because the prosecutors, the Department of Justice,

they had to show evidence and their evidence was very, very flimsy about why they think that Abrego Garcia is a threat to society so much so that he needs to be detained and he can't be even let out on bail. He just, you know, has to be there forever. On the other hand, you saw Abrego Garcia have a lawyer represent him and provide their own

cross-examination of the prosecutor's witnesses and provide witnesses in favor of Abrego such that the judge can balance and weigh the evidence and make a ruling because our system isn't just trust me, bro, or in the case of Trump,

whatever trump says that becomes the answer especially when we know that donald trump's lying the moment he opens up his mouth it's almost always the opposite of what he says is what's actually you know really happening so just a reminder everybody remembers abrigo was sent to el salvador

kidnapped, disappeared to a concentration camp at Cicat is what it was called in El Salvador. The Department of Justice lawyer who was then kind of fired and pushed out admitted it was a mistake because back in 2019, there was an order by an immigration judge when Trump was in office saying that Abrego Garcia could not be ever deported to El Salvador.

That based on hearsay witnesses and a lot of evidence that wasn't high quality, but an immigration judge did say there's enough if you want to deport this guy, deport him to another country. The one thing you can't do is deport him to El Salvador.

So what does the Trump administration do or the regime do in 2025? They deport him to El Salvador. The DOJ lawyer admits it was a mistake. The Trump administration fires that DOJ lawyer for admitting it was a mistake and they push him out. And then the Trump regime says there's nothing we can do to bring him back. He's stuck in El Salvador forever. We're not bringing him back. The pressure builds.

Abrego files a lawsuit against Donald Trump in federal court in Maryland. The Trump regime DOJ in the Maryland case seemed to be moving closer to criminal contempt. Voila, the Trump regime caves. They bring Abrego Garcia back to the United States after claiming it was impossible to do that. And but when they bring him back to the U.S., they indict him immediately on human trafficking charges, human trafficking like

And if you actually human trafficking and conspiracy to commit human trafficking, and when you actually look at what they're charging him with, they're basically saying that he was like a mule who was used to drive laborers around to work in different locations for a larger enterprise that would put migrants to work.

And so the claim was he was pulled over in Tennessee. That's why this case is in Tennessee, driving an SUV with eight people who seem to be migrants in the car. He was pulled over in a traffic stop, I think by like the Tennessee Highway Patrol while he was driving. The Highway Patrol, the Tennessee police officers pulled

They gave him a warning. They thought nothing of it in 2022. They stopped him. Maybe they were suspicious, but they had better things to do with their time than, you know, than deal with this. Who knows? But they didn't think that he would that there was human trafficking or that there was a danger or anything. They took a police report. They gave him a warning. He went on with his life.

Lived in Maryland with his family, an American wife, American kids. Every year he reported, he reported himself back to ICE and he would let them know his status once a year. He'd let them know they didn't think that he was a threat then at all. They didn't deport him to a foreign country, although they could have at any point in time other than El Salvador. And then the Trump regime as part of their cruel deportation.

exercises, sends them to the concentration camp in El Salvador, where currently there are still hundreds and hundreds of people who were sent there without due process who shouldn't be there. And they are fighting also to return to the United States. So

He's indicted in the Middle District of Texas and the Middle District of Tennessee. The head of the criminal division there, basically the number two person at that federal prosecutor's office in the Middle District of Tennessee, a guy named Ben Schrader, he immediately resigns. And I think we see why he resigned. I mean, we knew it was because this was a guy who was there during Obama,

Trump first administration, Biden and now Trump. Nonpartisan guy, well-respected top lawyer who goes after criminals, not people like, he's not here to do Trump's politicized bidding. So this guy left. And then literally the office couldn't find any prosecutor

to do this detention hearing other than the United States attorney, the top prosecutor, who is the interim top prosecutor in that district, which is just so rare that you would actually have that prosecute. The US attorney actually argue in a detention hearing that like that never, ever happens. And the purpose of a detention hearing, then I'll toss it over to you, Popak, about what happens is to determine, can you let a Bray go out

you know, pending the proceedings. He has to show up to court. If ultimately he's convicted of the crimes, he goes to prison, but can he be out on certain conditions?

And usually the kind of qualifications is like if you're a threat to society or a flight risk or things like that, you know, you could be detained during your proceeding. But ultimately, if the conditions satisfy the judge that you can be out and about and you'll show up to your court date and you'll be around and you're not going to flee the jurisdiction, they let people out all the time. You know, you see that people post a bond, they're let out and then they show up in their courts.

in their court proceedings. So that kind of sets the framework there. And so, you know, ultimately where this hearing devolved into when it was clear that the prosecutor did not have the goods at all on Abrego, they said, one of the reasons why we don't want you to let Abrego out is because he can be deported immediately by ICE and

To another country other than El Salvador, ICE may deport him. That's why you need to keep him detained. That was like the final argument to which the federal judge said, why is that? Why do I care about like that's not what I'm here to do. I'm here to if ICE does that, ICE does that.

And by the way, ICE can do that if they want to do. Even right now, if ICE wants to deport this guy to another country other than El Salvador, you won't hear Michael Popak and I say they can't do that. I don't like the quality of evidence that he was hit with in 2019 when an immigration judge made the order that said that he can be deported to other countries, but he can. That was the order. That was it.

The Trump administration could have done that. They didn't do that. So Popak, let's talk about the detention. I wanna take our last quick break of the show before we do that. The Michael Popak law firm is absolutely crushing it. The Popak firm, catastrophic injury cases like trucking accident cases,

car accident cases. The consultation with Michael Popak and Popak's firm is free. So you're not paying Popak. And then if he takes your case, you don't pay him unless there's a recovery. Wrongful death cases, sexual assault and harassment cases. You're handling all those types of cases, big negligence and malpractice cases. Where can they reach you, Popak? Yeah, thank you, Ben. It's a

It's my honor to represent people, especially the Legal AFers, the Midas Mighty and their world on these cases that turn your life and those of your loved ones upside down. So reach out to two ways. Easy. You can call and get help.

somebody on the phone right now and start talking about your case at 1-877-POPOK, A-F, it's P-O-P-O-K for those that want to know how to spell my name. And then we've got the firm website, which is also, I'm trying to make it simple, not just for our audience, but for me, www.thepopokfirm.com.

Also, subscribe to Michael Popak's YouTube channel, The Legal AF YouTube channel, on the way to 1 million subscribers, and Michael Popak's Substack, The Legal AF Substack. Let's take the last quick break of the day. I want you to tell us what went down in the detention hearing that

caught your eye and ear. We also had some boots on the ground in there. We've been working with Popak and I know they're going to work with the Legal AF channel, All Rise News as well. They do a really great job and we got a firsthand of

of what went down from them. I want you to talk about that. And then E. Jean Carroll has another victory against Donald Trump in the Second Circuit Court of Appeal. And Bong Panel, tell us about that. Then let's talk a little bit more about what happened in that federal election law case and maybe a few other things we'll talk about. Let's take our last quick break of the show. You ever notice the signs of getting older creeping in? Poor sleep, low energy, maybe a little brain fog or stiffness that didn't used to be there.

Same here. And healthy aging is something I've been thinking about more than ever. That's why I'm so excited to share with you guys C-15 from Fatty 15, the first emerging essential fatty acid to be discovered in more than 90 years. It is an incredible scientific breakthrough to support our long-term health and wellness. And you guessed it, healthy aging. Fatty 15 co-founder Dr. Stephanie Van Watson, she discovered C-15 while working with the U.S. Navy on

aging dolphins. Over 100 studies now show that C15 strengthens our cells and helps slow biological aging at the cellular level.

When our cells don't have enough C15, they become fragile and age faster. That's called cellular fragility syndrome. The first new nutritional deficiency in 75 years. One in three people worldwide may have it. Fatty 15 is a science-packed, award-winning, patented, 100% pure C15 supplement that repairs cellular damage, boosts sleep and brain health,

and helps your body feel younger from the inside out. I've been taking Fatty 15 for a few months now, and I really started noticing deeper sleep and more energy throughout the day. I wasn't expecting much at first, but I've actually seen a difference. And that's saying a lot when most supplements don't deliver. And it comes in a beautiful reusable jar with easy refills sent right to your door. Fatty 15 is on a mission to optimize your C15 levels, to help support your long-term health and wellness,

especially as you age. You can get an additional 15% off their 90-day subscription starter kit by going to fatty15.com slash legalaf and using code legalaf at checkout. In this crazy upside down world that we're working to make sense of, I have no better judge of character.

than my lab boarder, Collie Lilly. And having given her her forever home, we take pride in making sure that we feed her healthy, fresh dog food while making sure we don't break our back or the bank doing so. And my family is thrilled to have found Sunday's

for Lily having tried other freezer box brands, and we noticed the improved health of our dog almost right away. First, she loves the flavor, and we love what it's done to her coat, eyes, and breath. And with her weight management, so much easier to manage her weight with a scoop of sundaes than any other product we tried.

And this product is super easy for us to store and serve. It doesn't require refrigeration or the delivery of dozens of pounds of ice packs. Sundaes is fresh dog food made from a short list of human grade ingredients. Sundaes contains 100% all natural meat and superfoods and 0% synthetic nutrients or artificial ingredients.

Dog parents report noticeable health improvements in their pups, including softer fur, fresher breath, better poops, and more energy after switching to Sundays. Unlike other fresh dog foods, Sundays does not require refrigeration or preparation because of their air drying process. Just pour and serve.

Cancel or pause your subscription anytime with their 14-day money-back guarantee. Every order ships right to your door, so you'll never worry about running out of dog food again. Did I mention how easy and convenient it is to store the bags? Insert big wife smile here. Get 40% off your first order of Sundays. Go to SundaysForDogs.com slash Legal AF or use code Legal AF at checkout. Welcome back to Legal AF. Thank you to our pro-democracy sponsors,

discount codes are in the description below. All right, Michael Popock, tell us what was interesting to you about that detention hearing. The judge had not ruled yet whether or not Abrego can leave or not, but Abrego's lawyer was putting on a lot of good evidence and basically saying, if he was such a big threat based on a 2022 traffic stop,

Why didn't you care about him until all of a sudden he became this high profile figure that Donald Trump had to get? Seems seems a little suspicious, don't you? Don't you think? Abrego's lawyer, this guy Shabazz, was great. He was and he kept on basically saying to the prosecutor, he was like, do you realize that your only witness is?

tying a bragoat as a human trafficker is a snitch who y'all have deported five times already. So your main witness is someone who you already deported five times. What'd you make of it, Popeye? Yeah, I mean, the judge actually stopped him on that. I'm sorry, what did you just say about the confidential informant? He said he's a two-time felon and five-time deported person that's now gonna be able to stay in America because he snitched on my client. The judge was like, okay.

A couple of unusual things. Six hours in length is unusual for a detention hearing. The judge effectively, the magistrate judge, Judge Holmes, basically putting the Department of Justice back on its heels and saying, I'm not even sure you've met the threshold necessary to detain him, let alone what the indictment looks like.

and her not ruling at the time of the hearing. That's also unusual. She said it's unusual, but she also said these are unusual circumstances. Some of the facts that I picked up from my own read of what happened in the courtroom is they didn't get around to assigning a agent to do the investigation until the 28th of April. I'll put the timeline together in a minute. And the indictment got spit out less than a month later.

three weeks later on May the 21st, while the Trump administration is stonewalling and telling Judge Zinnis to pound sand in Maryland, telling the Supreme Court effectively and taunting the Supreme Court, like, we're not going to listen to your 9-0 decision about the return of Obrego Garcia. We're going to do it on our terms with a manufactured lawsuit, a manufactured criminal case in Tennessee that, as you said, based on a traffic stop in 2022,

in which they let the guy go. I mean, they played the body cam interaction. Now, there are some things in the facts that were brought out in the hearing that don't exactly track, like

Abrego Garcia said that they had come from St. Louis into Tennessee. But when they did later tracking of the car, he was not in St. Louis. He was in Texas. So whether he lied or didn't lie about that particular issue, whether that makes him a human trafficker, I don't know. But certainly the fact that the entire case was put together in three weeks

obviously under tremendous political pressure that led to the person that was responsible for the case after a 15 year career to throw in the towel and quit. The new person who's a Democrat, the acting interim US attorney basically said, I'm the last man standing. That's why I'm here. But I don't think that my federal agent who's about to testify is gonna throw away his career and perjure himself. So I believe him. That was the best he could do to present his case against sort of a withering cross-examination

of, by Obrego Garcia's lawyers with his mother in the room, his wife in the room. And I think they thought they did so well in just cross-examining the government's case in front of her, in front of the judge, the magistrate, Judge Holmes, that they didn't even bother putting on the brother. The brother of Obrego Garcia was in the courtroom ready to testify. And they didn't think they needed to put him on related to that. Now, what is a win for,

W.I.N. look like for Branco Garcia? So manage expectations sort of similar to what you touched on. He's he's currently in detention while she's making the decision. If she says there's no there's that you haven't met the threshold to show any of the danger to society, flight risk, all the things that are in the statute for detaining him pretrial based on this indictment with this flimsy evidence, then

She's not going to let him go because they're just going to transfer him to an immigration detention center for safekeeping until they do whatever the next thing they're going to do. They still have to deal with a federal judge in Maryland, Judge Zinnis.

who is not going to let up on the contempt proceeding because they were in contempt from April the 10th, at least through the return of Abrego Garcia on two Fridays ago, where they willfully flouted the orders of Judge Zinnis and of the United States Supreme Court, finding them in contempt.

I think is the next thing that's going to happen, especially based on some new filings that happened with Judge Sinnes that we covered separately. So you got that going on. His civil rights were violated. He was not given due process before he was sent to El Salvador. And the fact that he's now been returned doesn't solve that problem necessarily. Could they, as you said, deport him under other conditions?

circumstances as long as it doesn't violate that law. I still think there needs to be due process related to it. I still don't think Zinnis is going to give up on it. And we'll have to see how these next steps that are uncharted play out. But

I think that a win is going to be if we're able to announce on Legal AF and on the Midas Touch Network that he's not going to be detained for the criminal case. He's now been transferred over to federal immigration detention, wherever that may be. At least he's on this side of the Atlantic or on American soil where federal judges and habeas corpus petitions, and it looks like very competent lawyers that we know, of course, can assist him. So that's what I think plays out.

But the fact that it went six hours, the judge was skeptical during most of it. You had a kind of a half-hearted support for the case by the acting interim U.S. attorney. You had the one Homeland Security agent testifying about a three-week case that he trumped up. And all the other facts that we've talked about all came out at the same time. But if anybody thinks he's going home to Maryland to be with his wife and his two children who are all U.S. citizens, that's not happening.

Or at least it's not happening anytime soon. And from the outset, you know, it's never that I've like been like, and I've been rooting for a Brego Garcia as, as, as a human being. I don't really, I don't know enough about the guy to vouch for a Brego from, from what I've heard from people who work with him. Seems like a hardworking guy in Maryland. The people who we worked with at his union seem to like him, but look, if the guy commutes,

committed crimes in the United States.

and he receives due process and goes in front of a jury and a jury ultimately convicts him of crimes and crimes are presented through the normal course. Look, my position has always been that that's the system that we have. And you and I have always made it very clear. If there are migrants who are involved in criminal conduct, of course, they should either be deported or they should be fully prosecuted. That's not what the Trump regime is doing, though.

They're targeting factories. And as you mentioned at the outset, Home Depot parking lots and restaurants, and they're going into communities that are hardworking migrant communities, ripping families apart and creating, you know, torturing these hardworking communities with people who are paying their taxes, who are very important to the United States of America and who people who in those communities are

who are citizens, appreciate these people who are in the communities. My belief is always that there needs to be, for hardworking migrants, we need an overall overhaul of our immigration system. There needs to be more programs like the Dreamers Act and have a pathway to citizenship. People who are here undocumented, but who are working hard and paying their taxes and contributing and doing all of those types of things, they shouldn't have to fear immigration.

that they need to kind of live their lives and in hiding outside of their communities or the block that they live on. So I'm for comprehensive immigration reform. I'm for strong borders. I'm not for violations of due process. And Popak, I believe, even though I disagree with the immigration, how the immigration judge in 2019

used an officer's double hearsay statement of an officer who was kind of like disgraced for, I think, like being and taking money from giving secrets to prostitutes and taking them as like a whole thing about who the cop even was who was involved in that 2019. And it seemed like a shady, dirty cop to begin with who was involved in the 2019. But the order said,

you can deport this guy to any other country. He got the process before an immigration judge. I thought it was a bad process, but he got the process and they could have deported him to any other country other than the order just says, except El Salvador, you can't do it. And they went right to El Salvador. So it was at least good to see due process played out. I mean, look,

Trump got due process in the E. Jean Carroll sexual assault case where he was found liable. Trump got due process in the E. Jean Carroll defamation case where he was found liable. Trump got due process in the business records case where he was found, where he was criminally convicted on 34 felony counts by unanimous jury. Donald Trump got due process in his civil fraud case brought by the New York attorney general where he was found

found liable for massive fraud for guess what popak making up fake numbers

Kind of like what we see him doing now in the office, right? Like saying that this is worth 500 billion or 500 million, 100 million, 2.6 billion. Just change the numbers and inflate and deflate valuations whenever it benefited him. Just making up numbers all of the time. That's exactly how he's treating our economy, wrecking our economy. But going back to Trump's due process, why don't you talk about E.G. and Carol? I've got an update there. Yeah. Yeah.

Great update. So E. Jean Carroll was two cases, right? One had to do with whether a jury would find that she was sexually assaulted by Donald Trump in a dressing room at a department store near Trump Tower back in the 1990s, and whether she was defamed by him when he denied that that happened and then attacked her mentally, emotionally, physically. I mean, talking about what she looked like and everything else, and just classic defamation. That was...

before he was president. And then the second case, dovetailing on that, both federal, both in front of nine zero juries, presided over by the same judge, Judge Kaplan. The second trial, Carol 2, we call it, was for the same set of facts, but now to be assumed by the second jury that the sexual assault happened, as that term is used under New York penal law, and that whether he defamed her again while he was president.

The first case that went up on a, so he lost both. First case he loses, Lena Hobb is the lead lawyer, along with Joe Tacopina. Donald Trump does not testify, infamously goes to Scotland and decides to go into the bunker of one of his golf courses rather than testify, threatening to testify, but never does. And he loses, the jury finds sexual assault happened and that she was defamed and awards her $5.5 million. Yeah.

So we have a next trial. They appeal that. And that's the appeal I'm going to talk about next. They post the $5.5 million cash. Second trial happens about a month or two later, all before the election, by the way. Second trial, Takapina is replaced. Habba's out. They bring in new lawyers. And Donald Trump testifies.

and blames Joe Takapina for not letting him testify the first time. And how did that go? Not well. Jury awards $83.5 million now to E. Jean Carroll. That had to be bonded by Donald Trump because he couldn't scratch up enough cash at the time or didn't want to. It's now running with interest at about $100 million. That appeal sort of is based on this appeal. The first appeal by E. Jean Carroll on that

case because it dealt with presidential comments or comments made while he was president, better way to put it. Alina Haba gets trotted out to argue at the Second Circuit Court of Appeal. And they say, interesting, but you didn't raise it in time and you waived any presidential immunity argument or executive privilege argument. And that was, they could have taken it and tried to take it to the Supreme Court, but that's where it lies. It sits there at the Second Circuit and she lost.

Now they also appealed the $5.5 million, and they lost two to one at the Second Circuit way back when, way back when in December 30th of 2024 after the election, but before he was inaugurated.

And that's when, you know, Stephen Chung takes the social media White House communications director and says, Donald Trump got elected to reunite the country. Is that what we're watching? I'm sorry. Thank you. Is that what we're watching over the last 170 days? The reunification of America and peace and love. And yet this, you know, this attacks the court and attacks the judgment, attacks the judge all over again.

So Trump asked for what we refer to in the business as an en banc revisiting, re-evaluation of the appeal by the full entirety of whoever wants to participate at the Second Circuit, which is about 10. This time it's about 10 people because four or five judges have said, I got a conflict. I'm not around. I'm not here. So 10 judges looked at it. In order to get an en banc review to overturn – pardon me –

to overturn what the three-judge panel had ruled, you have to get a majority to be interested in that. So you got to get six out of the 10 to say, yeah, let's see it. Does he get six out of 10? No, he gets two out of 10 because the other eight said, yeah, not interesting. In order for you to win, there had to have been a manifest error

what we call reversible error by Judge Kaplan about evidence that was admitted. The main attack by Trump was he should, Judge Kaplan shouldn't have allowed in two other women who testified about being sexually assaulted by Donald Trump at other times.

And they shouldn't have let in the Access Hollywood tape where Donald Trump is infamously caught on tape, which he's never denied because he can't, about sexually assaulting women and getting away with it because he's a celebrity. And they shouldn't have allowed in some other witnesses that were contemporaneous, what we call outcry witnesses, who testified about what E.G. Carroll told them at or about the time of the sexual abuse and a lot of other little other things that happened. And let me just be straight with our public, with our audience.

Due process does not entitle you to a perfect trial. I've done 35 trials. I've never had a perfect trial. Nor does it entitle you to an error-free trial. It just entitles you to a reversible error-free trial, that it's not so manifestly erroneous.

that it didn't undermine your liberty, your due process rights. And so they said, look, the court originally said, look, Judge Kaplan made his decisions and has broad discretion, wide berth to make decisions about evidence. And given that, and the things that you've pointed out, we don't see a retrial here happening. And that was the ruling. It went up for the vote. And one of the three judges that originally ruled

jumped out with another statement in support and concurrence of the decision not to grant another appeal and said, there's nothing that you've raised that would require relitigating this case. No error that is so erroneous, so beyond the pale of law that we would reverse the ruling and give you a new trial. So en banc denied. They don't even get to en banc at all. Now his last stop, but I think it's a loser, Ben, is the United States Supreme Court because

You and I talk a lot about how this panel, this nine justices of the Supreme Court will rule when it comes to Donald Trump on Trump.

on a lack of due process for immigrants or presidential power or Doge or this or that. But when it comes to a case about Donald Trump before he was president, about a sex abuse judgment of a jury 9-0 and an affirmation by an appellate court, I just don't see them being interested enough to even take an application, won't be emergency, to even take a writ of certiorari and take it up on appeal. What do you think?

I agree. I don't think the Supreme Court will take it up. I mean, you know, perhaps Donald Trump tries to be, you know,

creative is probably not the right word you know trying to use some sort of presidential powers hook to not have to pay right now I I don't know what that even looks like but you know this is not a case involving presidential powers this is not a case involving presidential immunity this is not a case in the course and scope of of anything that he's doing uh in terms of his article two powers

So, I mean, the appeal to this full en banc panel of the Second Circuit was related to really just evidentiary issues about propensity evidence. I mean, their main issue on appeal, basically, is the fact that Donald Trump would continue to brag about sexually assaulting women throughout his life.

Should that have come into evidence? That's basically the issue. And those those two dissenting judges said that even though Donald Trump his whole life had said, you know, or frequently made comments about sexually assaulting women and grabbing women's vaginas without their consent and doing that.

That shouldn't have come into the trial about E. Jean Carroll. That's where the two said that was prejudicial to Donald Trump. So I don't think the Supreme Court weighs in on this pop up for that reason as well. But I think it's important for people to know what Trump was. The central part of Trump's appeal is you shouldn't have held on.

Even though there's a rule of evidence related to sex abuse crimes.

that allows that very evidence in. It's an exception to the general rule that you and I have done when we've been defense lawyers, which is, no, you don't get to bring in like, unless it's modus operandi or other things, bad acts in the past need to stay outside the courtroom so as not to influence the jury, except in matters like sexual abuse charges. Yeah, so-

I don't see it going to the Supreme Court. I just want to touch upon this because I mentioned it. With all of the news going on, we can forget about cases. Sometimes we don't put the emphasis on cases like this is why I want to mention it now. A federal judge blocked

Federal election officials from enforcing Trump's executive order, forcing states to apply citizenship requirements, saying it imposes significant burdens and would harm eligible voters. It's a ruling by Judge Casper out of the District Court of Massachusetts.

On March 25th, 2025, Trump issued Executive Order 14248, the Preserving and Protecting Integrity of American Elections Executive Order. Among other things, the executive order requires the United States Election Assistance Commission and the Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth.

to implement documentary proof of citizenship requirements with federal voter registration forms required to be used by plaintiffs, attorney generals in 19 states, California, Nevada, Massachusetts, Arizona, et cetera. They sued and said that this was unlawful.

And after careful consideration of the party's filings, briefs from Amakai Curai and oral argument by counsel, the court allows the state's motion for a preliminary injunction for the reasons explained below. And the judge goes on to say that

The states have also shown the risk of irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction where the challenged sections of the executive order would burden the states with significant efforts and substantial costs to revamp voter registration procedures and would impede the registration of eligible voters, many of whom lack ready access

access to documentary evidence of citizenship in light of the likelihood of success on the merits of their challenge of the aforementioned sections of the executive order. The risk of irreparable harm in the absence of the relief sought having been considered the balance of equities in the public interest. The court allows the state's motion for preliminary injunction. So we have that order there as well. An eventful and then full week indeed, Michael Popock gets

Why we when you and I embarked on this show now, what, like four years ago, five years ago, almost five years ago. You know, I didn't know that we were headed here, but I'm glad that we could at least bring the have built the infrastructure together.

that now during these very challenging and difficult times to make all of this knowledge accessible to people to read from the briefs like we just did to uphold due process to uphold our jury system to uphold the way law and order is supposed to be done in the united states of america and sure you know going through due process it has the word process

Sometimes processes can be clunky. They can be slow. They can be not always fair. We cannot like aspects of the process. We can be frustrated by the outcomes of the process, but the process and the balancing that our framers have

And that as our system has developed, it was largely viewed by the rest of the world as a shining example against all odds of how justice can be faithfully executed. And to see Donald Trump and his regime try to attack Americans.

Have the least competent and the most fascist leaning people try to attack and break our system. I mean, Trump, literally a criminal sexual abuser. He's a criminal. He is a sexual abuser. He's a bankrupt or try to destroy our system the way he's doing. It's it is it's sad. It's tragic.

but also it's motivating and it motivates us to fight on this No Kings Day. - Yeah, and happy Father's Day to everybody out there who serves as a father for a child. Ben, this is your first Father's Day. This is my first Father's Day with a child.

Very, very, very exciting. I'm sure your lovely wife has something great planned for you and your daughter. I know my wife does here. But a shout out to everybody. And be safe out there. As we know, we're going to follow. You're doing a great job on Midas Touch following the protests in the streets that organizations like 5051 have promoted. And it's not the last one. It's just the right counter-programming against the Trump administration. And to round out your point, you and I looked at each other after the election and said,

or actually just two months before the election in September. And we said, hmm,

we better get Legal AF up and running as a YouTube channel because our democracy may count on it. And, you know, you and I talked about it a lot. We kicked it around, spitballed it a lot for a number of years about having a separate channel, you know, in collaboration with Midas Touch. And we thought that right moment was September. Not because we were hoping for Kamala to lose, but we needed a break the glass emergency moment for our audience if we did. And I'm so, so honored and glad that you and I did that.

Shout out to all the hardworking team members at the Midas Touch Network as well, who spend their weekends working really hard. That's a shout out to Adam Salton, our top executive here at the Midas Touch Network. But down the lines, they all do a very good job. You don't see or hear from them, but we know how hard they work. So thank you. We should roll credits. We should roll credits someday.

They do great work. Anyway, everybody hit subscribe. Thank you to the Midas Mighty and Legal Affairs. We appreciate you. Shout out to everybody and keep checking back for more updates throughout the day and into the morning. Your life. You're living it day to day. On the road. At your business. In your home. At GreenState. We make a profound influence on people's lives. With loans designed for all parts of your life.

wherever that life happens to take you. Green State Credit Union. Loans for your best life.