We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode The Intersection with Michael Popok Full Episode - 6/10/2025

The Intersection with Michael Popok Full Episode - 6/10/2025

2025/6/11
logo of podcast Legal AF by MeidasTouch

Legal AF by MeidasTouch

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
M
Michael Popok
Topics
Michael Popok: 我认为特朗普政府正试图对加州进行法西斯式接管,这是一场关乎我们宪政共和国生存的斗争。特朗普正在尝试各种手段来压制加州,包括故意不与加州协调,派ICE突袭Home Depot和服装制造商,试图制造恐慌。他还利用加州民众的抗议作为借口来压制异议和反抗。我认为特朗普的行为正在撕裂我们的美国,他甚至威胁要逮捕加州州长。我感到亚伯拉罕·林肯和重建时期团结这个国家的努力正面临着前所未有的内部压力。我认为我们已经到了总统违反《民兵自卫法》,在国内使用美国军队对抗自己人民的阶段。我认为国会赋予总统权力的是一项联邦法规,而不是总统的指挥官权力。该法规允许三种触发事件,但似乎没有适用的。即使适用,特朗普仍然需要通过州长,但他故意跳过了州长。我认为法官可能会宣布特朗普违反了联邦法规,案件可能会迅速上诉到最高法院。

Deep Dive

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

The NBA playoffs are here, and I'm getting my bets in on FanDuel. Talk to me, Chuck GPT. What do you know? All sorts of interesting stuff. Even Charles Barkley's greatest fear. Hey, nobody needs to know that. New customers bet $5 to get 200 in bonus bets if you win. FanDuel, America's number one sportsbook.

21 plus and present in Illinois. Must be first online real money wager. $5 deposit required. Bonus issued is non-withdrawable bonus pass that expires seven days after receipt. Restrictions apply. See full terms at fanduel.com slash sportsbook. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Strap in. Hold on tight. You're on the intersection with Michael Popok, only on the Midas Touch Network.

We're going to talk about all those things at the intersection of law and politics that have happened in the last 48 hours that really matter, including coming on the air today, a new emergency order issued by a judge up in San Francisco, Judge Breyer. No, not that one. His brother.

that seems to be on its surface against California, but it's really not. It's going to lead to a hearing on Thursday. I'm going to break down and update you on everything going on with Donald Trump's attempted fascist takeover of California, hostile takeover of California, why it matters that California win against Donald Trump. And then I'll give you my analysis of the Supreme Court cases and other statutory analyses that put California on solid footing. Donald Trump

knowing, at least for now, that he can't use the Insurrection Act, is trying every other trick up his sleeve in order to try to bring California to its knees. It's just an existential fight for our constitutional republic, our way of life. That's all it is here on The Intersection. And then let's talk about the, put it all in perspective. You've got the Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth,

who demonstrates he doesn't know a thing about his job. He doesn't understand the statutes, the laws, the ways that Donald Trump is exercising and invoking certain military and warlike powers. He won't be there to justify it because he himself admits he doesn't understand it. They didn't bother briefing Pete Hegseth or he's unbriefable.

Is he so stupid he can't be briefed and therefore Donald Trump's handlers have just given up? Or is not briefing him, is that their strategy? So when he goes before Congress and they say, show me in the statute,

where Donald Trump gets off not involving the California governor in the decision of federalized national troops. Show me where that is. He said, well, you and I both know that the president has the power. No, we don't know that. That's why there's court cases, Supreme Court precedent, and you obviously can't answer the question without asking another question.

He then had to, he didn't know how much it was going to cost, but others have determined it's going to be $140 million or more for Donald Trump's muscle flex, his manufacturing of a crisis in order to use his brutal war powers against Americans. You can say that they're migrants, they're undocumented, they're carrying flags of First Amendment expression.

But most of what you're watching on television in California are everyday average Americans fighting back against the attack on California.

Donald Trump is trying to rip asunder our constitutional United States. And he's doing it by trying to take down California. His playbook for it was taken down Harvard. We'll talk about all of that and update you. And of course, the context, we've got the U.S. Army playing into Donald Trump's hands, and they're going to be doing a giant show of force in California.

In Washington on Donald Trump's birthday, of all things. And then I wake up in a fascist totalitarian regime. What is happening there? And then we've got the tariff issue. Once again, Claudia Scheinbaum of Mexico demonstrating that she knows how to eat Donald Trump's lunch right in front of him.

Because she just won the tariff war, the steel tariff war, just like she did before. Because she figured out taco, no pun intended, in Mexico before Donald Trump, other adversaries did. The Financial Times might have written about taco, but I think Scheinbaum invented it.

With Trump always chickens out, knowing that she knows how to play Donald Trump like a fiddle. And now there's no more steel tariffs in Mexico because they pointed out a simple little fact to the to the commerce secretary for Donald Trump. The perma smile, Howard Lutnick, always smiling, always. Hi, I'm doing great, aren't I? No, you're not.

There's supposed to be 90 trade deals because countries were going to be brought to their knees and kissing Donald Trump's backside. His tuchus, that's a legal term, because he was threatening them and saber rattling over tariffs. And how many now in the 150th day? Not one. Maybe one coming in China. Maybe one coming with Mexico. Maybe.

We'll talk about it and break it down. And the markets are reacting because they're looking for any good news, any silver lining they can find to trade on. Scott Bessette may be pushed into the Federal Reserve chairman position from the Treasury secretary. That's good. But that's not good.

First of all, Jay Powell's doing a great job. He's the only thing that connects the United States to its economy, the economy to the world economy. The only thing that keeps us connected to planet Earth is Jay Powell. We don't want him to leave any sooner than possible.

And if he's going to leave in May of 2026, who's going to take over at Treasury? Don't tell me the Commerce Secretary. He's doing such a terrible job in that role. We're going to kick him upstairs and have him fail up into Treasury to put his money on the, to put his John Hancock on the money? Heaven help us. So I want to put all of this together on this issue of the intersection. Thanks for being here.

We started this as Popock Live. It was sort of an irregular show every other Tuesday I would do. And then we just said, you know what? Let's make it a full-blown podcast. Let's call it The Intersection. I've been living at the intersection of law and politics my whole life, let alone the last five years as a co-founder of Legal AF.

And there's an audience here that I adore. That's been with me from the very beginning over the last six months since we've been growing. We get three, four, 500,000 people to watch the video. We get tens of thousands to participate in the actual recording and the live of the video of the podcast. So we said, now it's time.

It's time. We got legal layoff of the YouTube channel. We got legal layoff of the Substack. And now it's time for Popak Intersection. So I can just be no holds barred. I can throw everything, including the kitchen sink, at every topic I cover. Let's get into California. How did this all start? January this, sorry, January. See how far back it seems. June the 6th. Only a handful of days ago.

Donald Trump, on purpose, without coordinating with the state of California, brought ICE in to go after Home Depot and a clothing manufacturer to try to scare the crap out of people in a deportation raid. Not coordinated with local law enforcement, not told to this California governor. They just send the federal bootjack troops in.

And then invariably, when Californians got uncomfortable with that and decided to protest in the streets, Donald Trump used that as a manufactured excuse to try to crush dissent and resistance. Now, the last time I looked at the Constitution, I have the right to both petition the government for a redress of grievances, to peaceably assemble, and to voice my First Amendment expression.

Do I have the right to riot? No. Do I have the right to burn down the city? No. Do I have the right to murder and kill? No. Is that going on in California? No. Whatever's going on in California, had it been properly coordinated by the Trump administration in advance, which of course they never were going to do, then it would have gone fine, right? But there is a long body of case law that I've outlined on Legal AF

that does not allow the feds to force the state into participating in federal programs, to allow them to commandeer. There's actually anti-commandeering law to stop the feds from commandeering and take over

The National Guard, the National Guard is a state guard under the control of the governor. It can only be federalized under certain limited circumstances. There's a statute that Congress created and there's the Insurrection Act. Take Insurrection Act off the board. Donald Trump did not invoke it. And I don't think he will, even though he's getting close. He's using the words of insurrection, but he's not invoked it.

He said, if they spit, we're going to shoot. No, he said, if they spit, we're going to hit. If they loot, we're going to shoot. It's not a perverse Dr. Seuss book. It's the president of the United States talking about using excessive force and the military against his own citizenry. If we had a Congress with half a brain cell and a pair of brass ones, he'd already be impeached.

There'll be articles of impeachment already for what's happening in California to try to tear asunder our United States.

What else can you call the full weight of the federal government being used against one state? Sure, it's a huge state. It's also important to our economy and the world economy. It represents the fifth largest economy in the United States. Gavin Newsom, the governor, is a chief political rival of Donald Trump. He's likely top three, top two, top one for president of the United States come 2028. And they went after Gavin Newsom on purpose to try to take him down.

They said, we're going to arrest him. I mean, literally, Tom Homan, the czar of the border, said that he'll arrest any federal official, even the governor. And then Donald Trump on the lawn three days ago, it's hard to believe, three days ago on the White House lawn, getting in or out of the helicopter, said, yes, he should. He wants to be arrested. We should arrest him.

This administration has already, as a show of force to try to chill dissent and rebellion or resistance, has already indicted a state court judge, an elected official from New Jersey. So what's to stop them? Next up, a governor. And that matters because once you cross that line, all-out civil war could result. Yeah.

The thing that brought this country together with Abraham Lincoln and Reconstruction is under a pressure right now that I've never seen in my lifetime. Internal pressure. Sure, I read about the civil rights movement and I'm a student of it. And I understand that also had the chance of pulling it together. But you had a president in the White House, whether you started with JFK and then whether you went with RFK, his attorney general, and then Lyndon Johnson that held the country together, that used the National Guard in the right way.

to support the civil rights movement, to support Reverend Martin Luther King Jr., not to pour kerosene on the flames, have it tip over, and then send in the federal troops and violate the Posse Comitatus Act, which prevents a president, but only if enforced properly by the United States Supreme Court, from using the weight of the power of the U.S. military internally against its own people. Have we reached that stage yet?

Part of that story is being told right now in the courtroom of Charles Breyer. Charles Breyer, you may remember the name, his brother,

Stephen Breyer on the United States Supreme Court, not only on the United States Supreme Court, but came out in the last several months against Donald Trump in his own polite diplomatic way, but clearly against Donald Trump's assault on the federal judiciary and on the rule of law. And to support the statements of Chief Justice Roberts against Donald Trump, telling him to stop calling for impeachment of federal judges, but ask for their appeal at best.

So that family is now in the spotlight. 83-year-old Charles Breyer. 22-page complaint filed. Elegant in its pithiness. It's just straight to the point. Many attorneys general, not named Rob Bonta, would bring 100 pages of fluff. But no, 22 pages. And used all of Donald Trump's own words against him. His own social media posts. Those of Pete Hegseth. Bring it all into the case.

and seek an emergency temporary restraining order on an ex parte basis, meaning they only get to speak, they only get to file, and the other side will have to answer for it later. Now, that's the breaking news coming onto the air tonight on The Intersection. Judge...

Breyer has listened to both sides. The California side who wants an immediate temporary restraining order, I'd really would call it an administrative stay, temporary. And the Trump administration saying, give us one more day to file our brief overnight. And so with those horns of a dilemma, Breyer made a ruling, an emergency ruling just now. And he said, one, I hear the two competing sides. Two, I am not gonna rule now

on the ex parte motion for temporary restraining order. So do not. However, you're not all out of the woods yet. And I'm looking at you, Donald Trump. The order continued by saying, I'll give you till 11 a.m. Pacific time tomorrow, Trump, to file your brief. I'll then give Thursday morning. This is going very quick, everybody. This is high velocity rocket docket.

giving California until Thursday morning at 9 a.m. to file their brief. And everybody, I'll see you in court 1.30 Thursday afternoon in San Francisco in my courtroom. If you can't make it, you can do it by Zoom, which means we're going to be Zooming in if we can to be able to do real-time reporting.

And that hearing is going to be on whether the judge is going to grant the temporary restraining order on the two pieces of paper already filed or an administrative stay to allow for more briefing or further briefing. And this is a big issue. I can't think of a better judge for it. Been on the bench a long, long time. Moderate appointed by Bill Clinton has the right DNA, if you know what I mean, with the family business. And he's going to have to decide whether Donald Trump violated it.

A federal statute that Congress gave the power to the president, not under the commander in chief power, but under a statute.

The statute in particular, I've talked about it at length. It's in what we call Article 10 or Chapter 10 of the federal statutes. And that particular, which is 12406, and that allows for only three triggering events.

And there's none that seem to be applicable. Either he needs to suppress a rebellion against the government. That's not happening. He needs to do it in order to faithfully execute the law and the regular forces aren't sufficient. Why couldn't ICE, in collaboration with local law enforcement, put out the flames?

And those are the really only the only two that apply. And even if they apply and we had a rebellion or inability to faithfully execute, he'd still have to go through the governor and he purposely skipped the governor.

So right there, that's a violation of the statute for a federal judge like Breyer to declare for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in California, also in San Francisco, I've argued before it, for it to declare on the way to the United States Supreme Court, all probably within the next week, starting with briefing tomorrow, briefing Thursday, a hearing on Thursday, an appeal, I'm sure after that, a decision over the weekend, and then we're off and running.

And Donald Trump knows, at least for now, that the Insurrection Act won't work, that he doesn't have the grounds to do that. So he's held his powder dry for that. He hasn't actually invoked the Insurrection Act, although he uses the language of the Insurrection Act. And then you have Pete Hegseth, who's so over his skis in the role of the Secretary of Defense, it's not funny. He's testifying before Congress. And two fundamental things he doesn't know. How much it's costing to send the Marines in

to send in and to federalize the National Guard. The number turned out to be about $140 million. If you don't like that number, you're going to hate the number that Trump is spending for his birthday party, where he's going to have military tanks, 20 tons apiece, rolling down the streets of Washington.

for his birthday because he envies the fascist leaders of North Korea and of China. Sure, he saw it on Bastille Day in France, but that's not where he really got the idea. This show of might at this particular moment in time, he doesn't think this is a powder keg that could tip over. I do. We're watching a version of it in California.

So we've got all of that going on. And then again, the two questions that that Hegseth couldn't answer. How much are you spending? Don't know. What's the point for me? The law that justifies Donald Trump trying to federalize the National Guard in California. You and I both know he's got that power. That was the response because he's not prepared because he's purposely not prepared.

They send him in there without any cover because, A, they don't think he can hold that molecule of a thought in his head. And secondly, they don't want him to know the answer. The answer is there is no justification that he is violating the statute and he's violating ultimately the 10th Amendment of the Constitution, which reserves for the states and also the people all power that's not deposited in the federal government by our system of federalism.

State sovereignty. The feds only get to do what Congress says they can do or what the Constitution expressly, core functional-wise, says they can do. Absent that, it's the state power. It's the people's power. It says it in the Constitution. And that's why the lawsuit is centered around the 10th Amendment violation. I don't think Pete Hegseth knows the 10th Amendment. I don't think he could recite it, nor his oath of office.

So that happened. And then to round out this fascist takeover of America, you've got the U.S. Army, unfortunately, playing into the hands of Donald Trump. They were planning a relatively small affair to celebrate their 250th anniversary. Donald Trump found out that was coming up and it became, it's also my birthday. For my birthday party, I can have all the toys, all the military toys. That's going to be a $100 million event.

And after they have to repair the streets of Washington because they'll be crushed under the weight of the military, military gear. And what is the purpose? Imagine if you just wandered into Washington one day, a tourist or you're from another state. And all of a sudden you didn't get the memo and you see these the military is occupying D.C. It's a bad look. It's a bad look at this time when the president is calling himself a king and we see him as a fascist.

Can you imagine if a Democrat did this? Imagine if a Democrat cracked their knuckles and said, you know, I think it would be really great, a coronation for me, and a giant birthday party celebration where I'm going to spend taxpayer dollars showing off all the shiny objects in our military. How about that? I mean, even the Democrats would run them out of town. Even the Democrats would eat their own.

That's one thing about the Republicans, though. They're so power hungry. They're so worried about their own wallets and not yours and mine that they'll never oppose Donald Trump. That's why the midterms are so important. We've got to have the return of the House and the Senate to the Democrats in order to regain checks and balance, to check an abuse of power. I'm going to talk about all that. I'm going to talk about

the taco factor in Mexico, the tariff war that wasn't, and other developments at the intersection of law and politics. Here on The Intersection, you're on The Intersection with Popak here, a brand new podcast, picking up, I'm standing on the shoulders of Popak Live for this new podcast. Come on over. It's really important to show support if you like this kind of content. Come over to our podcast feed wherever you get your audio podcasts from. Just plug in The Intersection and there I'll be.

And download that. Tell your friends about it. Leave a five-star review. I sound like an Uber driver. I don't mean to. I'm sorry. But it is the way to signal to the algorithmic gods that you like this kind of programming. Leave a review. Tell your friends about it. Send the clips. Ask them to download. The audio really matters, as does the YouTube version of this as well. And then we've got Legal AF, the sub stack that I curate.

where we put up all these lawsuits and postings and orders. We post them up on Legal AF Substack so you can get your hands on them along with commentary. And then we've got Legal AF, the YouTube channel, Legal AF MTN. See, Legal AF comes in all shapes and sizes. You can get your fill of Legal AF. And if you can't, Substack, Legal AF YouTube, where I've got 12 different contributors all pulling together, pulling the wagon in support of the defense of our democracy. Come on, that's...

That's chef's kiss time, don't you think? And because of you, Legal AF is the number one law and politics podcast on the YouTube rankings, bar none.

let's try to get the intersection up there as well and now we got a some amazing pro democracy sponsors here on the intersection so i went to my 40th high school reunion recently while many of my classmates were excited about retiring or have retired well i brought my infant daughter to the reunion and i won the youngest child contest hands down

But that means that when most people's working is winding down to match their body's energy levels, I need to ramp up to keep up with my baby daughter. I believe one of the best aging breakthroughs of the last decade is qualiacetylitic. And here's why.

Qualia senolytic is at the frontier of what is currently possible in the science of human aging. Senolytics are a science field revolutionizing human aging. A big culprit behind that middle-aged feeling can be senescent cells, AKA zombie cells that linger in your body after their useful function,

wasting your energy and resources. Let me break it down. The accumulation of zombie cells can lead to less energy, slower workout recovery, joint discomfort, and basically, well, feeling old. Quali Acetylitic is a groundbreaking clinically tested supplement with nine vegan plant derived compounds that help your body naturally eliminate senescent cells.

helping you feel years younger in just months. Here's how it works. You take it just two days a month, helping your body naturally eliminate zombie cells to age better at the cellular level. And Qualia's breakthrough formulation is vegan, non-GMO, and tested by leading scientists. Since taking Qualia's senolytic, I felt like I've turned back the clock.

I got higher energy, less soreness after exercise and a big boost in productivity. It's made me feel more youthful and energized as I have the energy level to nurture my baby daughter the right way. Experience the science of feeling younger.

Go to qualialife.com slash Legal AF for up to 50% off your purchase and use code Legal AF for an additional 15%. That's qualialife.com slash Legal AF for an extra 15% off your purchase. Your older self will thank you. And thanks to Qualia for sponsoring this episode.

Want to be the most interesting person at the party? Well, with our next partner, you can bring the best, most interesting wine from an independent winemaker with a truly unique story. This podcast is sponsored by Naked Wines. It's 2025. Do you still shop for wine like it's 2005? Naked Wines is a service that directly connects you to the world's finest independent winemakers. So you can get award-winning wine delivered straight to your door.

Just use our code LEGALAF for the code and password at nakedwines.com and get their incredible deal of six bottles for just $39.99. I just received from Naked Wine a Matt Parish Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon 2021.

Simply delicious. And my wife and I love cracking open a bottle of wine, putting away our technology and just being present in the moment with family and friends. How do they do it? Naked Wines connects winemakers and wine drinkers directly, allowing for vineyard to your door delivery and up to 60% off what you would pay in store.

By cutting out the traditional retail middlemen, costs, and markups, winemakers can pass those savings on to you without skimping on quality. Plain and simple, the wine from Naked Wines is amazing. My wife and I love to have both white and red wine on hand for our dropover friends, so we split a box and it's perfect.

I've been rating the wine after I get it, and each shipment gets better and better. Naked Wines has been around for over 15 years and funds over 90 independent winemakers around the world. With no commitments or membership fees, you can enjoy Naked Wines hassle-free. And don't forget, you can pause or cancel at any time. So just because you got a trip coming up,

Doesn't mean you can't enjoy Naked Wines before or after that much-needed vacation. Now is the time to join the Naked Wines community. Head to nakedwines.com slash legal AF, click enter voucher, and put in my code legal AF for both the code and password for six bottles of wine for just $39.99 with shipping included.

That's $100 off your first six bottles at nakedwines.com slash Legal AF and use the code and password Legal AF for six bottles of wine for $39.99. Welcome back. You're on The Intersection, only on the Midas Touch Network with Michael Popock.

Trade wars, tariff wars are not going well for Donald Trump. And his mucking around with the economy isn't either. In particular, Donald Trump's tariff war is an utter and complete failure. Remember in April during the Rose Garden protests,

that now infamous Rose Garden scene where he said, mission accomplished. And they brought out the big board like it was Dr. Strangelove. And they said, look at all the numbers on the big board. We're going after all these retaliatory tariffs. And then we used our binoculars and other ways to take screenshots of the big board. And we realized that it was all fakakta. It was all upside down and backwards. And the formula was wrong. This was not tariffs that was going to balance trade deficits at all.

And we called him out on that. And then Donald Trump, after he announced that, and the markets tumbled, I mean, shaved $3 trillion worth of value, that he panicked. He watched the treasury market crumble. He then started getting phone calls from private equity, hedge fund owners, private equity owners,

Ken Griffith from Citadel, Pershing Square, Bill Ackman called him, you know, JPMorgan Chase's Jamie Dimon called him. He starts watching cable news because that's how this president operates domestic policy through cable news.

And he starts getting audience. People come and knock on the door, literally, at the White House, takes meetings with Home Depot, Walmart, and Target. And their chair people say, you want empty shelves for Christmas? This is the ghost of Christmas future. This is a failed economy. And then he hit the brakes on the economy. We all went lurching. Oh, 90-day pause. Okay. And then he said, we're going to have 90 deals in 90 days. That was 60 days ago. We don't have one deal.

One deal that they announced. 90 deals in 90 days with 90 different countries. Never happened. And now at the last minute, because they're desperate to announce any deal possible. They are so desperate and prone and lost their leverage that the rest of the world and smart leaders like Claudia Scheinbaum of Mexico are eating his lunch.

So the 50% tariff that got announced just last week in order to be a shiny object diversion from the Musk-Trump fight, which I'll cover as well, that and the Trump Federalist Society fight from the week before, Donald Trump needed a good news cycle. So suddenly he told auto workers,

And steel workers in America, 50% tariffs. And you know what percentage tariffs Mexico is going to be hit with now? With the new deal signed with Claudia Scheinbaum? Zero. Absolutely zero. For what? To tighten up the border a little bit? That's all she had to do. She figured out taco before it was avant-garde, before it was in vogue, so to speak.

She figured out, wait out Donald Trump, use her particular powers of persuasion and get him to fold. I mean, a stubborn little fact like Mexico sends in more, sorry, Mexico imports more steel than it exports. Yeah. Which is the upside down trade war that seems to have convinced them with a big smiley face. Howard Lutnick on behalf of the administration.

And then the markets are trying to figure out what's what because there's no deals in place. They're looking for any shiny object to trade on. Oh, we might have a deal with China. Market goes up a little bit. Oh, we might have a deal with Mexico. Market goes up a little bit. Oh, Scott Bassett, who we like for Treasury, he might be moved into the Federal Reserve. Yeah. So if that happens and Jay Powell's out, who's going to be in the Treasury Department seat?

He was the only adult in the cabinet, and now you're going to kick him upstairs to the Fed next year? That does not sit well with me, nor should it with you. And all of these distractors going after Harvard when Donald Trump's getting beat regularly in the courts, going after California, same thing, when he's got a failed public spat with Elon Musk and Trump.

And Donald Trump, just to distract from that, it's obvious. That's why we call it out here on the Midas Dutch Network and on Legal AF and on The Intersection.

I thought going into the show today on Tuesday that I would be talking a lot about Musk and Donald Trump and on the heels of Trump taking on the Federalist Society and amputating the hand that fed him. But forget it. You see how the news cycle works, how Trump fatigue works. But we got to focus on Trump and Musk to round out the intersection, don't we? And how it impacts the more than dozen cases that are out there.

Now, the Supreme Court, you might have already heard, gave Donald Trump a couple of victories in the Doge arena.

They said, nah, Social Security, all your private, confidential, most personal data about your medical, about your finances that are in the hands of the Treasury Department, the Social Security Service. Yeah, we're going to turn that over to Doge. That's OK for now. We might change our mind two years from now. But in the meantime, they can have access. We were like, oh, we all bemoan the Supreme Court's ruling on that one, giving Donald Trump a win.

But there are another dozen cases out there, including one in particular I'm keeping my eye on, which is the Judge Chutkin case presiding, brought by 14 attorneys general, in which they alleged that Elon Musk was improperly appointed or was never appointed under the appointment clause of the Constitution, was never confirmed by the Senate, and everything he did was ultra-various and illegal and can be undone and unwound.

That case is still alive. Nothing that the Supreme Court says has undermined it. Although at the rate the Supreme Court is making its rulings, you know, it doesn't bode well for those that want to hold Donald Trump accountable. Sure, there's occasional victories, especially in the area of immigration, especially in the area of politics.

of lack of due process. Everything else, they seem to be siding with Donald Trump in his exercise of power. Let's use, and I'll end the hot, I almost called it a hot take, sorry. I've been doing them all day. Let's end the podcast this way. Let's use Abrego Garcia as the final example.

That could have led off this podcast, but we've got so much going on in California, it seems like a distant memory. And yet it was only on Friday that they finally brought back Abrego Garcia on some phony trumped up charges, no pun intended, an indictment that was rendered on two count indictment in the Middle District of Tennessee that was so poor and so in bad faith.

That a 15-year prosecutor resigned his job in the Middle District of Tennessee rather than continue to prosecute that case. Suddenly he's a drug smuggler, a gun smuggler, a human being smuggler. Yeah, bring him into court, give him his day in court, give him the evidence and his adversarial process and due process, and let's see what a judge says. I'm not sure that indictment makes its way past the motions it dismisses.

Why was it done? It was done because Judge Zinnes in Maryland was this close and is still considering bringing an order of contempt against the Trump administration for their failure since April to return a Brego Garcia. They just brought him back on Friday, despite a 9-0 vote by the United States Supreme Court telling them they needed to do it on April the 10th. And Judge Zinnes telling them every week since that they're in violation of her order.

And now she's invited. On Thursday, she invited the contempt motion by the other side, the Abreu Garcia. And on Friday, he suddenly reappeared after Pam Bondi told the world, I can't bring him back. I won't bring him back. You'll never see him again. Yeah, we just saw him Friday being arraigned in Tennessee.

They used the phony cover of wallpapering over this whole issue by claiming that it was an extradition right. Well, see, we had a crime and we just asked El Salvador to send him back pursuant to extradition. And so we got him back, but it wasn't through diplomacy. And we really have no control over the jail there. That's a lie.

Judge Boasberg, who's the chief judge of D.C., also last Thursday declared that he found that the Trump administration does have control or at least co-control over that jail in El Salvador. He certified a class of 250 people who were sent to El Salvador in violation of their due process rights, their notice rights, and they were litigating again in front of another judge who found the Trump administration to be in contempt.

So does anybody buying that on a slow news day when Donald Trump was getting his butt kicked in court on a 96% losing streak? Is anybody surprised that they manufactured a win for themselves?

And that they manufactured a phony return of Abrego Garcia. He's still being kept pretrial detention in Tennessee. But soon, soon, Judge Zinnes is going to be heard from. Now, the feds, the Department of Justice has filed a paper with Judge Zinnes and said, hey, nothing to see here, Judge. Dismiss the case. I know you were dealing with Abrego Garcia, but he's back. He's back. But that's not the only aspect of the case, you nimrods.

The Supreme Court said that Judge Zinnis had to ensure the Fifth Amendment rights, due process rights, and notice about him being sent to El Salvador. Were they or were they not violated? She's still getting to the bottom of that. He was in a jail cell for several months. It's not game over. And the argument would go, the Trump administration has been violating the

Judge Zinus's order for several months now, meaning they can be found in contempt, even though they brought him back. So it's hard to believe Abrego Garcia and his return is at the bottom of my pile given this week. But the things in California are so important that we focus on together that I had to bring it up. Again, honored that you've joined this new podcast, The Intersection with Michael Popak here on the Midas Touch Network.

I'll keep bringing it to you every Tuesday at 8 p.m. Eastern time on this YouTube channel. And then, of course, we need audio download support. Can I put it any clearer? We really do. It's what keeps this kind of content all locked in together for you, talking truth to each other.

The Intersection with Michael Popock. Legal AF, the OG podcast, Wednesdays and Saturdays at 8 p.m. Eastern time, also on the Midas Touch Network and then on audio podcast platforms. Right now, Legal AF, the number one law and politics YouTube podcast out there on the YouTube rankings. That's it.

But we could use help there on the audio download too. Leave reviews. That helps us. Come over to Legal AF, the YouTube channel, Legal AF MTN. Hit the free subscribe button. We're trying to get to 700,000 subscribers before this month is over. We will do it with your help. But we are humbled to have you with us, to count you as our friends, as part of our fellowship.

So until my next The Intersection, I'm Michael Popock, and I'm reporting. I'm Michael Popock, and I got some big news for our audience.

Most of you know me as the co-founder of Midas Touch's Legal AF and the Legal AF YouTube channel, or as a 35-year national trial lawyer. Now building a what we started together on Legal AF, I've launched a new law firm, the Popak Firm, dedicated to obtaining justice through compassionate and zealous legal representation. I'm a legal lawyer, and I'm a legal lawyer.

At the Popock Firm, we are focused on obtaining justice for those who have been injured or damaged by a life-altering event by securing the highest dollar recoveries. I've been tirelessly fighting for justice for the last 35 years, so my own law firm organically building on my legal AF work just feels right. And I've handpicked a team of top-tier trial fighters and settlement experts throughout all 50 states known as Big Auto Injury Attorneys

who have the know-how to beat heartless insurance companies, corporations, government entities, and their attorneys. Big Auto's attorneys working with my firm are rock stars in their respective states and collectively responsible for billions of dollars in recoveries.

So if you or a loved one have been on the wrong side of a catastrophic auto, motor vehicle, rideshare, or truck accident, suffered a personal injury, or been the victim of medical malpractice, employment harassment, or discrimination, or suffered a violation of your civil and constitutional rights, then contact the Popock Firm today at 1-877-POPOCAF or by visiting my website at www.thepopockfirm.com.

and fill out a free case evaluation form. And if we determine that you have a case and you sign with us, we don't get paid unless you do. The Popock Firm, fighting for your justice every step of the way.