We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode E79: Analyzing the leaked draft overturning Roe v. Wade with Amy Howe and Tom Goldstein

E79: Analyzing the leaked draft overturning Roe v. Wade with Amy Howe and Tom Goldstein

2022/5/7
logo of podcast All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg

All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg
AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
A
Amy Howe
C
Chamath Palihapitiya
以深刻的投资见解和社会资本主义理念而闻名的风险投资家和企业家。
D
David Sacks
一位在房地产法和技术政策领域都有影响力的律师和学者。
T
Tom Goldstein
Topics
Amy Howe: 罗诉韦德案确立了宪法赋予堕胎的权利，并在计划生育诉凯西案中得到重申，但对堕胎限制的宪法测试有所改变。保守派长期以来一直试图推翻这一判决。 Tom Goldstein: 罗诉韦德案中堕胎权的依据是宪法赋予的隐私权，即身体自主权，这成为保守派长期攻击的目标。保守派在宪法解释上存在两种观点：原文主义和更进步的观点。 Chamath Palihapitiya: 最高法院在此案中决定的是谁有权决定堕胎问题，而不是直接立法禁止堕胎。如果推翻罗诉韦德案，堕胎问题将交由各州立法机关决定，联邦政府将不再干涉。宪法修正案难以通过，导致堕胎问题反复诉诸法院。 David Sacks: 推翻罗诉韦德案可能对其他权利，如同性婚姻等产生影响，但这种可能性较小。公众对最高法院的信任度下降，部分原因是罗诉韦德案的判决结果出乎意料。在宪法解释中，应兼顾原文主义和社会现实，体现人文关怀。各州立法机关在制定堕胎相关法律时，需要在不同利益之间寻求平衡和妥协。美国民众对堕胎的立场存在细微差别，并非完全一致。共和党需要在堕胎问题上寻求中间立场，以避免失去选民支持。实现政治家与民众意见的一致性，需要妥协和寻求共识。

Deep Dive

Chapters
The leaked draft suggests overturning Roe v. Wade, shifting the decision on abortion laws from a federal to a state level. The Supreme Court's potential move raises questions about the role of historical precedent and the implications of the draft on existing laws.
  • The draft opinion by Justice Alito could overturn Roe v. Wade, moving abortion regulation to states.
  • The Court's decision could redefine the constitutional right to abortion, impacting existing precedents set by Roe and Casey.
  • The leaked draft has sparked nationwide debates on the Supreme Court's role and the future of abortion rights.

Shownotes Transcript

0:00 Amy Howe (@AHoweBlogger) & Tom Goldstein (@SCOTUSblog) join the show to break down the leaked draft overturning Roe v. Wade

28:07 Potential downstream impacts from the precedent of overturning Roe v. Wade

43:03 How will the leaked draft impact the Supreme Court going forward? Should there be age limits for SC justices?

1:05:09 Analyzing the path forward

Follow Amy and Tom:

https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger)

https://twitter.com/SCOTUSblog)

Follow the besties:

https://twitter.com/chamath)

https://linktr.ee/calacanis)

https://twitter.com/DavidSacks)

https://twitter.com/friedberg)

Follow the pod:

https://twitter.com/theallinpod)

https://linktr.ee/allinpodcast)

Intro Music Credit:

https://rb.gy/tppkzl)

https://twitter.com/yung_spielburg)

Intro Video Credit:

https://twitter.com/TheZachEffect)

Referenced in the show:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21835435-scotus-initial-draft)

https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep410/usrep410113/usrep410113.pdf)

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/505/833/case.pdf)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/04/abortion-supreme-court-confirmation-hearings)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_Supreme_Court_candidates)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/17-1618_hfci.pdf)

https://www.wsj.com/articles/abortion-and-the-supreme-court-dobbs-v-jackson-mississippi-john-roberts-11651009292)

https://beyer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=5330)

https://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/ECM_PRO_059254.pdf)

https://news.gallup.com/poll/350486/record-high-support-same-sex-marriage.aspx)

https://news.gallup.com/poll/1576/abortion.aspx)