I Got A Legal Threat From A Sitting President… | Candace Ep 130
Candace
Deep Dive
Why did Candace Owens receive a legal letter from Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte Macron?
Candace Owens received a legal letter from a law firm representing French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte Macron, addressing statements she made in March about Brigitte Macron's gender identity. The letter accused her of defamation and requested that she not publicize it. The Macrons claimed that Owens' statements were part of a disinformation campaign and defamatory, particularly regarding the implication that Brigitte Macron is transgender.
What was the content of the legal letter sent to Candace Owens by the Macrons?
The legal letter from the Macrons accused Candace Owens of defamation for her statements about Brigitte Macron's gender identity. It stated that Brigitte Macron does not owe proof of her gender and that Owens' claims were defamatory. The letter also referenced Owens' T-shirt mocking Brigitte Macron as 'Man of the Year' and criticized her for spreading 'yellow journalism.' Additionally, it addressed Owens' comments about the Macrons' relationship, including the age of consent in France and allegations of dishonesty.
What evidence did the Macrons provide in their legal letter to refute claims about Brigitte Macron's gender identity?
The Macrons provided a YouTube link to an eight-year-old video showing a man in the background of Emmanuel Macron's inauguration, claiming it was Jean-Michel Trogno, the alleged former identity of Brigitte Macron. They argued that this was proof that Brigitte Macron is not transgender. However, Owens found this evidence unconvincing, as it relied on a still image and a YouTube video rather than direct, verifiable proof.
Why does Candace Owens believe the Macrons sent the legal letter now?
Candace Owens believes the Macrons sent the legal letter to intimidate her and prevent the release of an explosive investigative piece she is working on about Brigitte Macron. Owens had recently interviewed a French journalist who provided evidence supporting the claim that Brigitte Macron transitioned from a man named Jean-Michel Trogno. The letter was sent just 10 days after Owens' initial correspondence with the journalist, leading her to suspect that the Macrons were monitoring communications and trying to silence her before the story went public.
What is Candace Owens' response to the legal threat from the Macrons?
Candace Owens is not intimidated by the legal threat and plans to release her investigative piece on Brigitte Macron as scheduled. She views the letter as an attempt to silence her and believes it will backfire, drawing more attention to the story. Owens also plans to correct any factual errors in her previous statements and send pointed questions to the Macrons, challenging them to provide evidence to refute the claims about Brigitte Macron's gender identity.
What does the legal letter reveal about the Macrons' relationship and the age of consent in France?
The legal letter reveals that Emmanuel Macron and Brigitte Macron met in 1993 when he was 15 and she was his drama teacher. The letter states that the age of consent in France is 15, but it omits the fact that the age of consent does not apply if the person in question has power or control over the minor, such as a teacher. This implies that their relationship could still be considered statutory rape under French law, despite the age of consent being 15.
What does Candace Owens plan to do with the information she has gathered about the Macrons?
Candace Owens plans to release a detailed investigative piece on Brigitte Macron, including evidence from a French journalist who claims to have proof that Brigitte transitioned from a man named Jean-Michel Trogno. Owens intends to correct any factual errors in her previous statements and send direct questions to the Macrons, challenging them to provide evidence to refute the claims. She believes the story will gain significant attention and is banking on public interest to uncover the truth.
What does the legal letter suggest about free speech in France compared to the United States?
The legal letter suggests that free speech in France is more restricted compared to the United States. The Macrons' letter implies that questioning the integrity of a president or first lady is considered defamatory in France, whereas in the U.S., such critiques are protected under free speech. Owens highlights this difference, emphasizing that the Macrons' attempt to silence her through legal threats would not hold the same weight in the U.S., where free speech is a fundamental right.
- Legal letter from Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron to Candace Owens
- Accusations of defamation
- Request not to publicize the letter
- Discussion of Brigitte Macron's gender identity
Shownotes Transcript