We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
Trump VS Kamala: The Unexpected Winner… | Candace Ep 62
2024/9/11
Candace
C
Candace Owens
Candace Owens对特朗普与哈里斯的辩论进行了评论，她认为哈里斯在辩论中表现出的抱怨和唠叨令人难以忍受，并对辩论结果进行了总结，她认为哈里斯利用情感而非理性来打动她的目标群体，并指出民主党支持堕胎到怀孕九个月，批评哈里斯对此的谎言。她还批评哈里斯虚报种族身份以争取选票，并认为哈里斯在辩论中模仿马丁·路德·金的演讲风格以赢得选民。Candace Owens还讨论了关于哈里斯佩戴蓝牙耳机的阴谋论，并最终驳斥了这一说法。她还评论了泰勒·斯威夫特对哈里斯的背书，并批评斯威夫特的做法。Candace Owens认为辩论没有赢家也没有输家，因为双方都满足了各自支持者的期望。她还批评反诽谤联盟（ADL）的言论，并指出该组织的历史问题。Candace Owens讨论了政府试图控制互联网信息，并鼓励人们保留线下信息备份。
Deep Dive
Candace analyzes Kamala Harris' debate performance, questioning its authenticity and suggesting it was a calculated act designed to appeal to an emotional audience. She points out Harris' repeated use of personal anecdotes and emotional appeals, particularly on abortion, arguing that it resonated with her base but lacked substance. Candace also criticizes the moderators for apparent bias, citing the fact-checking of Trump five times while Harris went unchecked despite alleged falsehoods.
- Kamala Harris' debate performance focused on emotional appeals and personal stories.
- Trump was fact-checked five times by moderators, while Harris was not.
- Candace questions the authenticity of Harris' performance, viewing it as political theater.
Shownotes Transcript