We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Is the U.S. military ready for the wars of the future?

Is the U.S. military ready for the wars of the future?

2024/8/28
logo of podcast Consider This from NPR

Consider This from NPR

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
E
Eric Schmidt
领导谷歌从初创公司发展为全球科技巨头,并在AI研究和发展中发挥关键作用。
M
Mark Milley
Topics
Mark Milley: 美国正在经历一场战争性质的重大变革,这种变革体现在无人机、机器人等技术的使用上,以及人工智能带来的强大能力。当前战争中展现的技术只是未来战争的预兆,未来战争将发生根本性变化。美国需要理解未来战争的根本性变化,并据此制定作战概念、未来部队属性,以及改变采购系统等。美国现有的15年武器采购战略与科技快速发展脱节,需要彻底改革。美国武器承包商的运作方式与科技行业不同,这导致美国无法快速适应科技发展。美国需要加大对新技术的研发投入,以保持其军事优势。俄罗斯正在大力发展无人机技术,这将对美国的国家安全构成威胁,美国需要采取措施应对。 Eric Schmidt: 自动化和武器的大量使用将迅速改变战争方式,乌克兰战争就是一个缩影。未来战争中,武器将不再与士兵绑定,而是由无人机等自动化系统控制,这将提高精准度,降低附带损害和成本。美国对未来战争的准备不足,这将导致美国在未来战争中处于劣势。五角大楼的武器采购流程过于缓慢,无法适应快速发展的科技,这使得美国在应对未来战争时准备不足。美国需要改变其武器采购流程,采用类似科技行业迭代式开发的方式,才能适应未来战争的快速变化。以色列和哈马斯冲突中,双方都错失了利用技术改进战争方式的机会。美国军方应拨出一定比例的预算用于探索性技术研发,以应对未来战争挑战。

Deep Dive

Chapters
Warfare is undergoing a significant transformation due to advancements in technology, reminiscent of the changes seen in the 1930s with the advent of airplanes, radios, and mechanization. Modern warfare is increasingly characterized by the use of drones, robots, and artificial intelligence, as evidenced in conflicts like those in Ukraine and Gaza.
  • Modern warfare utilizes drones, robots, and AI.
  • These technological advancements mark a significant shift in the character of war, comparable to the changes seen in the 1930s.
  • Conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza offer glimpses into the future of warfare.

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

When you conjure an iconic image of Americans fighting in war, this may come to mind. Tom Hanks as Captain Miller shouting orders on Omaha Beach and saving Private Ryan. Where are you guys? What's the rallying point? Or Robert Duvall's Lieutenant Colonel Bill Kilgore on another beach, this time in Vietnam, in Apocalypse Now. You smell that? Nightclub, son. Nothing else in the world smells like that.

I love the smell of napalm. Smell! You know that gasoline smell? The whole hill smells like victory. Or Anthony Mackey's Sergeant J.T. Sanborn and Jeremy Renner's Staff Sergeant Will James fighting snipers in an Iraqi desert in the Hurt Locker. Left window, left window. Got him? Got him. He's down.

A few war movie classics. And you will notice they all show men fighting men on D-Day, in Vietnam, and in Iraq. Now, they are fictionalized, but they do pretty much reflect the way war has been fought for the last century or so. Now, that way of fighting, it's changing. We're getting word of a Ukrainian drone strike in a major city in western Russia. I see no doctor!

In total, 45 Ukrainian drones were reportedly downed across Russian territory. Ukraine is targeting the source of Russia's air power with what a security source is calling the biggest attack on Russian airfields since the war began.

Historically, war has been one man trying to shoot another man. Looking at it as a technologist, why would you ever want your weapon to be tied to a person? Put the person on the ground drinking coffee and have the weapon be in a drone and have it be automated. Consider this. Technology is changing the way war is waged. Is America ready to enter the fight? From NPR, I'm Mary Louise Kelly.

Support comes from our 2024 lead sponsor of Consider This, Anthropic.

Claude by Anthropic is AI for everyone. Claude offers groundbreaking intelligence at a price that works for heavy-duty tasks. Claude can generate code, help with writing, and reason through hard problems better than any model before. Claude pushes the creative and performance limits of what you can accomplish with AI. Join the groundswell of people that trust Anthropic with their AI tasks. Discover how Claude can help you at anthropic.com slash Claude.

This message comes from our sponsor, Grainger. This is the story of the one. As a maintenance engineer, he hears things differently. To the untrained ear, everything on his shop floor might sound fine, but he can hear gears grinding or a belt slipping. So he steps in to fix the problem at hand before it gets out of hand. And he knows Grainger's got the right product he needs to get the job done, which is music to his ears.

Call, click Grainger.com, or just stop by. Grainger, for the ones who get it done. This message comes from Instacart. This Halloween, ghoul all out with Instacart. Whether you're hunting for the perfect costume, eyeing that giant bag of candy, or casting spells with eerie decor, Instacart has got it all in one place. Download the Instacart app and get delivery in as fast as 30 minutes. Plus, enjoy $0 delivery fees on your first three orders.

Offer valid for a limited time, minimum $10 per order. Service fees, other fees, and additional terms apply. Instacart, bringing the store to your door this Halloween. ♪

It's Consider This from NPR. Is the U.S. military ready for the wars of the future? Our next guests have a blunt answer to that question. No, they have ideas for what American forces need to do to get ready for the ways that technology is transforming warfare today.

And these are folks who know a thing or two about tech and warfare. As the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark Milley, and as the former head of Google, Eric Schmidt is former CEO of Google. Welcome to you both. Thanks, Mary Louise. Appreciate the honor. Thank you, Mary Louise. So y'all have written a piece on this for Foreign Affairs. You open with Ukraine and with a war that features thousands of drones in the sky and

AI helping soldiers with targeting, robots clearing mines. Is that the kind of war of the future that you're contemplating as you think about this? The kind of war that y'all are arguing the U.S. isn't ready for? General Milley, you first. Well, Mary Louise, I would say a little bit of context here. We are undergoing an historic change in the character of warfare. The last major one, the really significant fundamental change,

was the 1930s with the introduction of the airplane, the radio and mechanization. So today what we're experiencing is the introduction of drones, robots that fly, but also drones on the ground and drones at sea. And also driven by artificial intelligence and the extraordinary capability that that's going to bring. Now, it's not here in full yet, but what we're seeing are snippets, some movie trailers, if you will,

of future warfare. And you're seeing that play out in Gaza. You're seeing it play out in Ukraine. You're seeing it play out elsewhere around the world.

Eric Schmidt, apply all this to Ukraine, or if you want, apply it to what's happening in the Middle East. Our coverage, I think like a lot of news organizations, has focused on the fighting, on the security aspects, on the humanitarian crises underway. From a tech perspective, as you track these wars, what leaps out to you? The biggest news is that autonomy and abundance...

are going to transform wars very, very quickly. The only reason it hasn't happened is, thank goodness, the U.S. is not at war. Others are. But if you study Ukraine, you see a glimpse of the future. Much of the Kursk invasion that recently happened was due to their ability to use short and mid-range drones to support combined operations on the ground.

And I think there's every reason to believe that you're watching a new model. Historically, war has been one man trying to shoot another man. Looking at it as a technologist, why would you ever want your weapon to be tied to a person? Put the person on the ground drinking coffee and have the weapon be in a drone and have it be automated. You're going to be much more surgically precise in terms of your targeting, much less collateral damage. And using modern techniques, we can make the cost much lower.

I'm worried, of course, that this will ultimately set a new standard and actually lower the cost of war. But if you think about it, this technology is going to get invented one way or the other, and I'd like it to get invented under U.S. terms. So to go to the core of the argument—

That y'all are advancing. Why is the U.S. unprepared to make the case? It sounds like a starting point might be that the U.S. is not actively involved, at least boots on the ground in that sense, in either of the major wars unfolding right now, Ukraine, Gaza, that we're talking about. Well, General Milley worked very hard to fix this, but not even the President of the United States can fix the procurement process of the Pentagon.

So the procurement process is designed for weapons systems that take 15 years. In the Ukraine situation, innovation is occurring on a three to six week timeline. And we need to find a way to get the Pentagon on that tempo. And the only way to do that is

is with other authorities and other approaches and with an understanding that you don't design the product at the beginning and then develop it over five years. You do it incrementally, which is how tech works. You get the minimum viable product, you know, and that's outside of the mindset of the U.S. procurement, in my view. General Milley?

I agree, Mary Louise, with Eric. First, there needs to be a comprehension or an understanding. We are in the midst of really fundamental change here. And then from that, you have to have an operational concept.

And then from that, you've got to identify the attributes of a future force. And then from that, change the procurement system in order to build the technological capabilities, modify the training, develop the leaders, etc. But how do you do it? To the point that Eric Schmidt just raised, that the Pentagon is on a 15-year procurement strategy.

If that remains true, and he also nodded to your efforts to fix it, if that remains true, are we always going to be hopelessly out of sync as tech is advancing so quickly? Our procurement systems need to be completely overhauled and updated. And Eric is an expert on all of that.

If you take a look at the way tech works, you just squeeze the minimum innovative product out and then you just pound on it and make it better and better and better. And you do that every week. That is precisely not how our contractors who build our weapons are operated. And the reason they don't do it, it's illegal. So our hope, if I can speak for the general as well, is that what's going on in Ukraine and to some degree in Israel will show a way for the people who are skeptics to

Who is doing this well? Countries, groups, that when you look at the way they are applying tech to warfare, you think, wow, they're way out in front. Well, historically, you would say Israel. However, if you look at Hamas and Israel, and of course the Hamas attack was horrific, it would have been much better if Israel had essentially weaponized drones.

They could see the muzzle flash or the rocket flash from Hamas and immediately destroy it. It would have been much better if Israel had invented tunnel-clearing drones so you didn't have to send their very courageous soldiers into those tunnels, which are enormously dangerous, as the general can describe. So in every conflict I see, I see the militaries missing an opportunity to invent.

Let's imagine that the Secretary of Defense had – at Google, we had this rule that 10 percent of our budget would go for things which were not our core mission nor adjacent. They were just interesting. To apply that to the military, why does the military not have 5 or 10 percent of its total budget at its command –

under its control to do things that are completely new. General Milley, how would that go down? Five to 10 percent of the military budget just to be thinking outside the box. I think it'd be great, but I think it'll be a very difficult sell because one of the things that, you know, you have to have here is a high degree of collaboration and synergy between the Hill, the executive branch, and then the Pentagon, and of course industry. But we are entering into a period where

where we, the United States, need to put the pedal to the metal and get on with this because this future operating environment is coming at us. We need to overhaul the procurement system to keep pace so that we maintain our position as the number one power. Let me make it even stronger. Russia, as part of the war that it took to Ukraine, is developing huge drone factories.

Those huge factories will ultimately produce weapons that are directly targeted at the United States. What is our response? How do we deal with a thousand cheap drones coming over one of our bases? These are the questions that bother me a lot about American security. Eric Schmidt, former CEO of Google, and we're

retired Army General Mark Milley, former chair of the Joint Chiefs. Their essay for Foreign Affairs is titled America Isn't Ready for the Wars of the Future. Thanks very much to you both. Thanks, Mary Louise. Appreciate it. Thank you.

This episode was produced by Erica Ryan and Catherine Fink. It was edited by Katie Riddle and Courtney Dornan. Our executive producer is Sammy Yinnigan. And one more thing before we go, you can now enjoy the Consider This newsletter. We still help you break down a major story of the day, but you'll also get to know our producers and hosts and some moments of joy from the All Things Considered team. You can sign up at npr.org slash consider this newsletter.

Let's consider this. From NPR, I'm Mary Louise Kelly.

Washington Wise is an original podcast from Charles Schwab that unpacks the stories making news in Washington and how they may affect your finances and portfolio. Listen at schwab.com slash Washington Wise.

Support for NPR and the following message come from Rosetta Stone, the perfect app to achieve your language learning goals no matter how busy your schedule gets. It's designed to maximize study time with immersive 10-minute lessons and audio practice for your commute. Plus, tailor your learning plan for specific objectives like travel. Get Rosetta Stone's lifetime membership for 50% off and unlimited access to 25 language courses. Learn more at rosettastone.com slash NPR.