We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Is Trump's immigration bet working?

Is Trump's immigration bet working?

2025/6/11
logo of podcast Consider This from NPR

Consider This from NPR

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
C
Caroline Leavitt
G
Gavin Newsom
S
Simon Hankinson
Topics
Caroline Leavitt: 作为白宫新闻秘书,我认为特朗普总统正在兑现他的竞选承诺,即采取强硬的移民政策。我们认为,执行移民法是我们的职责,即使这意味着要面对一些抗议和骚乱。民调显示,大多数人支持我们加强边境安全和驱逐非法移民的政策。我们不会被左翼的抗议活动所吓倒,将继续坚定地执行我们的移民政策,以保护美国的安全和利益。我们所做的一切都是为了确保我们的社区安全,并遵守法律。 Gavin Newsom: 作为加州州长,我认为特朗普政府在洛杉矶的移民政策是不人道的,并且适得其反。派遣军队到我们的城市,只会加剧紧张局势,并导致更多的恐惧和不信任。我们不希望看到我们的街道被军事化。更令人担忧的是,政府在移民执法过程中,逮捕了包括孕妇和儿童在内的无辜民众,导致家庭分离,社区受到创伤。我认为这种做法是不可接受的,我们将尽一切努力来保护我们社区的居民,无论他们的移民身份如何。特朗普政府的政策正在破坏我们的社区,而不是保护它们。 Simon Hankinson: 作为保守派智库的分析员,我认为特朗普政府在洛杉矶的移民政策是合理的,并且是必要的。地方政府不应该抵制联邦政府执行移民法,这是他们的责任。当地方政府不愿意维持和平和保护生命时,联邦政府有权采取行动。我们不能允许抗议活动演变成骚乱和暴力,必须采取强硬措施来维护法律和秩序。我认为,只有通过加强移民执法,才能真正解决移民问题,并确保我们的国家安全。我们必须回到执行我们的移民法,而不是忽视它。

Deep Dive

Chapters
The White House claims Trump's immigration actions are fulfilling his campaign promises. Public opinion polls show some support for Trump's deportation policies, with 54% approving in one recent poll.
  • White House defends Trump's immigration actions as fulfilling campaign promises
  • 54% approval of Trump's deportation policies in a CBS poll

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

The White House message on what's happening in Los Angeles is simple. This is what President Trump was elected to do. President Trump promised to carry out the largest mass deportation campaign in American history, and left-wing riots will not deter him in that effort.

That is White House Press Secretary Caroline Leavitt on Wednesday. It is true that polls have found people trust the Republican Party more to handle immigration. And a CBS poll taken last week found 54 percent approve of Trump's deportation policies. But Trump

is making a big bet on how far Americans want him to go. He mobilized National Guard and active duty troops that the mayor and governor say they don't need. Here's California Governor Gavin Newsom in a primetime address Tuesday. He deployed more than 700 active U.S. Marines.

These are the men and women trained for foreign combat, not domestic law enforcement. We honor their service. We honor their bravery. But we do not want our streets militarized by our own armed forces. The administration says its immigration efforts are focused on criminals. And Press Secretary Levitt rattled off rap sheets of some, quote, illegal monsters apprehended in Los Angeles.

But Governor Newsom highlighted other people swept up in workplace raids. A U.S. citizen, nine months pregnant, was arrested. A four-year-old girl taken. Families separated. Friends, quite literally, disappearing. Newsom called the administration's actions unsafe and illegal. Donald Trump's government isn't protecting our communities. They're traumatizing our communities. And that seems to be the entire point.

Consider this. Trump is doubling down in Los Angeles. We'll hear from a conservative immigration analyst who thinks it'll work. From NPR, I'm Mary Louise Kelly.

This message comes from Strawberry.me. You've worked hard to get where you are, but what's next? Strawberry.me Career Coaching helps professionals like you take the next big step with confidence by matching you with a certified career coach who understands your goals and challenges.

This isn't just advice. It's a personalized, results-driven approach to uncover hidden strengths, overcome obstacles, and accelerate your career growth. Visit strawberry.me slash NPR to claim your $50 credit. Decades ago, Brazilian women made a discovery. They could have an abortion without a doctor, thanks to a tiny pill.

That pill spawned a global movement, helping millions of women have safe abortions, regardless of the law. Hear that story on the network, from NPR's Embedded and Futuro Media, wherever you get your podcasts. ♪

It's Consider This from NPR. For insight into the conservative strategy around immigration, we called Simon Hankinson. He's a senior research fellow in the Border Security and Immigration Center at the Heritage Foundation. Your top line assessment of the situation as it stands in LA, and I'll ask that more colloquially, if I bumped into you tonight at a dinner party and asked, hey, I've been away, what's going on in LA? How would you answer? Well,

Well, business as usual. I think it was predictable that increased enforcement or any enforcement of immigration law in the interior after four years of basically ignoring the law would have an impact on major cities. And sooner or later, there were going to be demonstrations. There was going to be something like the May 2020 protests.

riots, demonstrations, whatever you want to call them, public displays of unhappiness. And Los Angeles... You're talking about people in the streets after the George Floyd situation. Yes, exactly. I guess my question, just to jump in, if I were, again, asking you what's happening in LA right now, is it going, in your view, is it going well? Is it going poorly? Anything surprising you? Unfortunately, I'm not surprised. I think the

The enforcement is going well on the whole, but in California, obviously, it's hit a bit of a political obstacle. What we're seeing is the city of Los Angeles and the state of California resisting federal efforts to enforce immigration law. And we're not talking about presidential directives here, executive orders. We're talking about immigration law passed by Congress, a bipartisan law signed by presidents Democrat as well as Republican.

So you've started to answer this, but I'll just put it to you directly. To those who argue, look, this is the Trump administration who is now claiming credit for averting a crisis, for tamping down violence, but this was perhaps a crisis of the administration's own making. There weren't any protests in L.A. until ICE agents went in. What do you say? Well, I guess if you take that line of reasoning, then what you're saying is the federal government cannot enforce immigration law.

And if they do, the price is there'll be violence in the street. You know, that's sort of an extortion, really, by a state, a nullification of federal law. And I do understand the president is making a stand here because he can probably see that this will happen in other cities and other states. Yeah.

The president has taken some unusual steps in L.A., and I want to ask you specifically about sending active duty military over the objections of state and local leaders. In your view, is that justified? I think it's justified when you have a threat to federal property and when you have local authorities that are unwilling to keep the peace and to protect lives.

We saw in Portland in 2020, a federal building was taken over. We saw federal property damaged. We saw a lot of people injured and a couple billion dollars worth of property damage. There's already been some looting and some property damage in Los Angeles. And I think that's something that the administration really wants to avoid this time.

And I'll note that we're seeing reports of fewer clashes Tuesday night. A curfew has kicked in. 200 plus people were arrested. That's LAPD statistics. Local law enforcement says we've got this. We can handle it. Well, maybe they say that now, but what would they have said had there been no federal response whatsoever? We saw in 2020 and we've seen at other periods that

local officials essentially letting these things burn out. You know, let's just let them burn some cars and trash some buildings, and then we'll go in afterwards. And this time it died down much quicker. And I think the threat, the real threat, that there would be an active federal presence was what caused local authorities to crack down earlier than they would, for example, with the curfew that Mayor Bass put on. I mean, I guess if the goal...

Is law and order, if the goal is avoiding ending chaos? I suppose we should note that protests have spread to cities across the country. We're seeing reports from Seattle, from Dallas, from Chicago, from Boston. So what counts as victory here? I think tactically victory is that the riots or the demonstrations, rather, don't get out of control, that people are allowed to demonstrate peacefully. They're allowed to express their opinions peacefully.

but that we don't have wide-scale looting, property damage, and the ruining of lives in generally poor and underprivileged or business parts of our major cities. That would be a tactical victory. The strategic victory would be that we once again go back to enforcing our immigration law and not ignoring it. Simon Hankinson of the conservative think tank, the Heritage Foundation. Thanks so much for your time. Thank you, Mary Louise.

This episode was produced by Gabriel Sanchez and Connor Donovan with engineering by Becky Brown. It was edited by Sarah Handel and Courtney Dornan. Our executive producer is Sammy Yenigan. It's Consider This from NPR. I'm Mary Louise Kelly.

Like the climate, our idea of home is constantly changing. So NPR is devoting an entire week to rethinking home with stories and conversations about the search for solutions. From planting trees to reducing energy use to disaster-proofing your house. Explore stories that hit close to home during this year's Climate Solutions Week. Visit npr.org slash climate week.

It all starts with listening to the person in front of you and the person you'll never meet, to the person living a story and the journalist who helps you see it in a new light. The NPR network is built on listening with microphones in every region. So where there any time a voice or sound demands to be heard, hear stories in the first person, hear the bigger picture on NPR.

Want to hear this podcast without sponsor breaks? Amazon Prime members can listen to Consider This sponsor-free through Amazon Music. Or you can also support NPR's vital journalism and get Consider This Plus at plus.npr.org. That's plus.npr.org.