We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode On the way out: Transportation Sec. Buttigieg looks back on achievements, challenges

On the way out: Transportation Sec. Buttigieg looks back on achievements, challenges

2025/1/12
logo of podcast Consider This from NPR

Consider This from NPR

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
P
Pete Buttigieg
Topics
Pete Buttigieg: 我认为拜登政府在交通基础设施建设方面取得了显著成就,创造了大量就业机会,并改善了弱势群体的状况。我们通过美国救援计划拯救了经济,创造了数百万个就业岗位,降低了失业率。在应对各种危机,例如供应链中断、航空延误和桥梁坍塌等方面,我们采取了积极的行动。我们还推动了电动汽车革命,确保其成为美国主导的产业。尽管如此,我们的努力似乎并没有得到足够的公众认可,这可能是因为基础设施建设需要时间才能显现其效益,也可能是因为当前的信息环境使得传统政治策略的有效性降低。 但我坚信,随着越来越多的项目完工,人们会越来越欣赏这项工作的价值。我们已经看到建筑业、制造业的就业水平达到了前所未有的高度。此外,我们还努力在交通项目中融入社会公平的理念,为弱势群体创造更多机会,改善他们的生活条件。这不仅体现在改善交通便利性上,也体现在为当地居民创造更多高薪工作岗位上。 虽然取得了一些成就,但我们也面临着挑战。互联网时代的信息环境使得传统政治策略的有效性降低,一些网络上的言论可能会误导公众,影响政策的实施。我们需要改进沟通方式,让更多人理解我们的工作和目标。 未来,我将继续致力于维护美国的自由、权利和解决重大问题,为国家和人民的福祉做出贡献。 Scott Detrow: 本次访谈主要围绕美国交通部长皮特·布蒂吉格对拜登政府交通政策的回顾展开。访谈中,布蒂吉格部长对政府在基础设施建设、电动汽车发展和应对交通危机等方面的成就进行了总结,同时也承认了政府在公众沟通和政策宣传方面的不足。他认为,基础设施建设的长期性和复杂性,以及当前互联网时代的信息环境,都对政府政策的公众认知度造成了影响。此外,他还谈到了政府在交通项目中融入社会公平理念的努力,以及在应对批评声音时,如何平衡政策目标和公众舆论。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

What were some of the major crises Pete Buttigieg faced as Transportation Secretary?

Pete Buttigieg dealt with significant crises, including supply chain backlogs, widespread airline delays and cancellations, collapsing bridges, and freight train derailments. These challenges required immediate attention and public communication to address voter concerns and maintain trust in the administration's handling of transportation issues.

What was the significance of the infrastructure spending under the Biden administration?

The infrastructure spending under the Biden administration aimed to build half a million electric vehicle (EV) charging stations along U.S. highways, ensuring the EV revolution is American-led. This initiative was part of a broader effort to modernize infrastructure, create jobs, and reduce reliance on foreign technology, particularly from China.

How did Pete Buttigieg address concerns about social justice in transportation projects?

Buttigieg focused on empowering communities historically disadvantaged by transportation projects, such as neighborhoods affected by segregation-era infrastructure decisions. His approach included improving transit access, creating jobs in the building trades, and ensuring that new projects benefited the neighborhoods they were built in, aiming to rectify past injustices.

What challenges did Buttigieg face in communicating the administration's infrastructure achievements to voters?

Buttigieg acknowledged that while infrastructure projects are long-term investments, their benefits often take time to become visible to the public. He noted that the administration's efforts, such as the bipartisan infrastructure law, were significant but not immediately appreciated by voters, partly due to the slow nature of infrastructure development and the complex information environment.

What role did the internet play in shaping public perception of government policies during Buttigieg's tenure?

Buttigieg highlighted that the internet has empowered individuals to act as reporters, increasing transparency. However, he also noted the downside: the lack of editorial oversight has led to misinformation and weakened the public's ability to discern fact from fiction, complicating traditional policy communication and public trust.

What were Buttigieg's thoughts on the future of democracy and his role as a private citizen?

Buttigieg expressed a commitment to upholding democratic values and norms, regardless of his role. As a private citizen, he plans to continue advocating for freedom, rights, and collaborative problem-solving, focusing on issues that matter to his family and communities he has engaged with during his time in office.

Chapters
This chapter discusses the Biden administration's infrastructure accomplishments, focusing on the bipartisan infrastructure law and its impact. It explores the disconnect between the administration's efforts and public perception, highlighting the time lag between project completion and public appreciation.
  • Billions in infrastructure funding distributed
  • Half a million electric vehicle charging stations planned
  • Increased employment in construction and manufacturing
  • Bipartisan achievement in infrastructure

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg has been one of the most public figures of the Biden administration. We need to build our economy back better than ever, and the Department of Transportation can play a central role in this. That's Buttigieg in 2021 speaking at a Senate confirmation hearing.

Once he assumed the role, the nation would often see or hear Buttigieg on various news programs coming to the defense of the administration's policies, goals and efforts to address voter issues. Like in 2022, Buttigieg defended Biden's efforts to ease inflation at a time when the economy was still recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic.

If we hadn't rescued the economy through the American Rescue Plan, we would not have had the 10 million jobs that were created under this president. We wouldn't be seeing some of the lowest unemployment numbers in the history of the republic. Buttigieg dealt with his share of crises in the job. Supply chain backlogs, widespread airline delays and cancellations, collapsing bridges, freight train derailments. Through it all, he kept doing media and kept making public appearances, but

which was notable in a carefully scripted administration. - There's two kinds of people who show up in the aftermath of a disaster. People who are there because they have a specific role to play and they're there to play their role and do the work and help the community. And people who are there because they want to be seen being there and they want to look good. When I'm there, it's going to be about action. Buttigieg was also a point person for some of the White House's biggest policy pushes.

like the infrastructure spending that will ultimately build half a million electric vehicle charging stations along U.S. highways. The most important thing is that the EV revolution will happen with or without us, and we've got to make sure that it's American-led. And that's what the president is focused on. We don't want China—look, under the Trump administration, they allowed China to build an advantage in the EV industry. But—

Under President Biden's leadership, we're making sure that the EV revolution will be a made-in-America EV revolution. Consider this. From handling crises in the rail and airline industries to overseeing the distribution of billions of dollars in funding, Pete Buttigieg has taken on a lot over the past four years. And now his tenure is coming to an end. Coming up, my conversation with the outgoing Transportation Secretary about what the Biden administration accomplished and didn't accomplish

and what he's taking away from an election where voters resoundingly called for something different. From NPR, I'm Scott Detrow.

It's Consider This from NPR. In the last days of the Biden administration, there are some loose ends to tie up, and one of those is the bipartisan infrastructure law. Earlier this week, the Department of Transportation's Federal Aviation Administration announced more than $330 million for airport grants across 32 states.

Infrastructure spending is something that got a lot of attention throughout Biden's time in the White House. So that is where I started my conversation with outgoing Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg. You and others in the administration spent years getting the message out there, putting these projects into place. I know how many airports you visited to tout these accomplishments.

And yet a lot of different metrics, including the election results, suggest that maybe voters didn't quite appreciate that. It didn't seem to land. It didn't seem to be a reaching a consensus of, wow, the Biden administration did this for me. I'm wondering how you make sense of all of that.

Well, a lot of the things that we work on are worth doing, whether they're getting a lot of political credit or not. We do safety work to save people from losing their lives on our roadways or in the aviation system. We don't expect people to cheer for us on doing that. We just do it because it's the right thing to do. And our infrastructure is something that should just work.

That said, I do think that as more and more of these projects go to completion, we're going to see more and more of an appreciation for what this infrastructure era has done to make people better off. We're already seeing levels of employment in construction, building trades, manufacturing that we haven't seen in my lifetime. Think about the Affordable Care Act.

took years before people fully appreciated them. And the very nature of infrastructure work is it takes some time. That said, I'm going to keep telling the story and waving the flag because it is extraordinary what we did and what will continue to happen in this country. It didn't happen on its own. It was a bipartisan achievement at a time when anything bipartisan is pretty rare in this town. And I think we're going to be benefiting from it for the rest of our lives.

That being said, this idea that Americans wanted to see their government working for them more was such a concrete thesis of the Biden administration. It's something that you you campaigned and wrote about before you joined this administration. Given where we are at this point in time, the transition of power that's happening, has that made you rethink anything, whether it was the way that this was approached or the way that it was communicated?

We always knew that part of what we're doing is turning a very big ship in terms of the condition of American infrastructure and the condition of a lot of things that Americans count on government to do. But that's going to take a lot of time and that the best thing that could come of that is a higher baseline level of public trust in what government can do for them. Do you think you achieved that?

Well, I think we set things on a different trajectory, but we're also operating in a different information environment. We're now living in a time where some dude on the internet has as much authority as somebody holding themselves to the highest journalistic standards of fact checking and research. And that is something that I think can swamp a lot of our more traditional calculations about what makes for good policy and good politics.

You, up until this point, are the most high-profile millennial to hold national office. I guess Vice President-elect Vance will join that club in a matter of weeks. But as we talk about this, I'm wondering, you came of age with the internet. Do you think it's done more harm or good for government, for public policy at this point in time?

I think at best it has cut both ways. You know, one thing that I think it has made possible is it's empowered everybody to be a reporter. And there are things that we find out about, including things that have happened in our communities or on our streets that no one would have known about if it weren't possible to record and publicize that through the Internet.

On the other hand, what we found is that everybody is a reporter, but nobody's an editor. And the idea that you do, in fact, have a responsibility to separate fact from fiction, to make judgments about what deserves real scrutiny or real attention, that's something that has clearly weakened in our society as a result of some of these technologies. Also, for my entire lifetime, you could use a photograph...

usually to settle a question about whether something was true or false. That's less and less true. And adapting to things like that is really going to test our capacity as a society, as a species.

I want to talk about, for a moment, social justice and transportation. You at times talked about Robert Moses and got the attention of nerds who love the power broker. But, you know, to get to these broader examples of the way that infrastructure and transportation projects were often built in a way that furthered injustice instead of helping to fix it, you had talked early on about wanting to take that head on. And are there areas where you feel like you accomplished that goal, whether it was a neighborhood, where it was a particular road?

Yeah, I mean, we were able through so many of our projects to empower the very kinds of people and homes and families and neighborhoods that used to get rolled over by transportation projects in the past. And that's really twofold, both making neighborhoods better off with transit access to places that didn't have it in the past or roads that are built with their neighborhood in mind, but also the jobs we created. I mean, the number of people getting good paying jobs in the building trades who are actually in

Literally making these things happen and happen in the neighborhoods where they grew up in is extraordinary. And I believe it's unprecedented. So we've really been able to make a big difference. There's still a long way to go. You know, it took decades to get the way we are, everything good and everything that needs to change. And it's going to take a while to get to a new reality. But we're well underway in what I like to call this infrastructure decade.

When you made those comments, there was this parallel reaction of excitement from people who love thousand-page books and criticism in some of the right-wing press that this was yet another example of identity politics, social justice-type governing.

And I'm asking that because in the months since the election, there has been all of this back and forth about did Democrats kind of veer too far in that lane? Did that hurt them politically? I'm wondering what you make about that general conversation and if you have any big takeaways on the policies of the last five or six years and how people are interpreting them.

You know, I think it was a reminder of how some voices in the media can get people whipped up over anything when we're talking about measures that don't make anyone worse off and make a lot of people better off. I will never be able to relate to the idea that it's wrong to confront people.

segregation that neighborhoods still have to live with because of some physical design decision that was made in the 50s or 60s. When we see that, we should put it right. And that's what we set out to do. Do you think there's something to the idea that your party needs to talk about these things in a different way to bring more people along? I think

Any way you come at it, the most important thing is the actions, not the words. I think that there has been a lot of hyperventilating about vocabulary. I think that this is something that you see in different flavors from all sides of the aisle. My side of the aisle gets lost in jargon sometimes.

And there's some really troubling things that you see in terms of vocabulary of what comes from the other side of the aisle, too. But look, the bottom line is we need to do the thing and then figure out how to talk about what we're doing. And the thing that we're doing is fixing roads and bridges across the country. You're going to be a private citizen.

You, along with many other Democrats, really raised deep, deep concerns about what a second Trump administration would mean on the rule of law, on democracy, on many other fronts. How are you going to be approaching that, whatever you do next? How are you going to be responding? Do you have any thought about what you will charge yourself with doing when you're out of office?

What I know is that most Americans believe in some basic values and some very important norms that hold our country together.

Frankly, no matter how you vote, a strong majority of Americans believe in making sure that our country is a freedom loving place, that people have rights and that we solve big problems together. And that's something that I'm going to continue to care about and work on. I'll be doing it as a citizen rather than as a policymaker, at least for the foreseeable future. And I'm going to do everything I can to work on the things I care about.

and the things that are going to matter to our family in Michigan and to so many people who I've gotten to know along the way in this work. Secretary Pete Buttigieg, thanks so much. Thank you. Good speaking with you. This episode was produced by Brianna Scott, Avery Keatley, and Tyler Bartlam. It was edited by Adam Rainey. Our executive producer is Sammy Yedigan. It's Consider This from NPR. I'm Scott Detrow.

Want to hear this podcast without sponsor breaks? Amazon Prime members can listen to Consider This sponsor-free through Amazon Music. Or you can also support NPR's vital journalism and get Consider This Plus at plus.npr.org. That's plus.npr.org.