We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode The big SCOTUS decisions looming

The big SCOTUS decisions looming

2025/6/16
logo of podcast Consider This from NPR

Consider This from NPR
AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
A
Ari Shapiro
C
Caroline Leavitt
K
Kate Shaw
N
Nina Totenberg
Topics
Caroline Leavitt, Stephen Miller, Donald Trump: 我们认为法官是阻碍特朗普政府政策实施的 recurring villain。这些法官是激进的、流氓的，不应该被允许存在。他们试图阻止总统的权力和政策，而这些政策是总统当选后应该执行的。 Kate Shaw: 特朗普政府的行为之所以受到广泛的、跨意识形态的谴责，是因为这些行为明显违法，这一点对所有法学家来说都是显而易见的。法院的干预并非出于政治动机，而是对行政部门越权行为的必要制衡。 Caroline Leavitt: 我们希望最高法院能够介入并限制全国性禁令的使用，因为这些禁令允许下级法院的法官阻止影响整个国家的政策生效。这种做法是对行政权力的过度干预。

Deep Dive

Chapters
The Trump administration faced numerous injunctions, blocking its policies. Legal scholars argue this is due to the administration's unlawful actions. The Supreme Court's decision on nationwide injunctions will impact the administration's power.
  • Numerous injunctions against Trump administration policies
  • Legal scholars cite unlawful actions as the reason
  • Supreme Court decision on nationwide injunctions will impact presidential power

Shownotes Transcript

Around this time every year, the U.S. Supreme Court ends its term with a bang. The Justices typically save their biggest rulings for June.Outstanding cases include the president's birthright citizenship executive order, a Tennessee law blocking gender-affirming care and a Texas law requiring age verification for porn sites.NPR legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg walks through the cases that may define this term.For sponsor-free episodes of Consider This, sign up for Consider This+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org). Email us at [email protected]).Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices)NPR Privacy Policy)